Geological disaster evaluation method and system

Abstract

The invention provides a geological disaster evaluation method and system, and the method comprises the steps: analyzing the geological disaster hidden danger conditions of at least two pieces of first geological disaster data with consistent or similar attribute directories, and obtaining at least one comparison result queue; analyzing the geological disaster hidden danger condition of at least one piece of second geological disaster data except the at least two pieces of first geological disaster data in the at least one comparison result queue to obtain second geological disaster data of the at least two pieces of first geological disaster data evaluation results; therefore, the analysis performance of the geological disaster hidden danger condition can be improved, important information in the geological disaster hidden danger condition can be effectively utilized, the geological disaster hidden danger condition can be more accurately obtained from a large number of geological disaster hidden danger conditions, and the accuracy and reliability of an evaluation result can be guaranteed.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of data evaluation, and in particular to a method and system for evaluating geological hazards. Background Art

[0002] With the continuous development and progress of the information age, the field of geological disasters has also achieved concrete development and can realize intelligent report evaluation. However, how to evaluate accurately is a technical problem that is difficult to solve at present. Summary of the invention

[0003] In order to improve the technical problems existing in the relevant technologies, the present application provides a geological disaster assessment method and system.

[0004] In a first aspect, a geological hazard assessment method is provided, the method comprising at least: obtaining first implementation geological hazard status description information of each of at least two first geological hazard data; wherein the at least two first geological hazard data have a consistent or similar attribute catalog, and each of the first implementation geological hazard status description information includes at least one disaster description element; comparing the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological hazard status description information of the at least two first geological hazard data to obtain at least one comparison result queue; determining at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue, and second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue; in response to each of the second geological hazard data, generating an assessment result of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data on the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data is greater than a threshold value for the number of disaster description elements.

[0005] In an independently implemented embodiment, the evaluation results of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data are generated on the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data is greater than the threshold value of the number of disaster description elements, including: on the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data is greater than the threshold value of the number of disaster description elements, a comparison result queue of matches for each disaster description element in the second implementation geological hazard status description information is generated; on the premise that the number of comparison result queues of matches for disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information is greater than the first threshold, the evaluation results of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data are generated.

[0006] In an independently implemented embodiment, the method also includes: on the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than a second threshold, generating a preset geological hazard distinction relationship between the at least two first geological hazard data; determining at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue, and the second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue, including: on the premise that there is a preset geological hazard distinction relationship between the at least two first geological hazard data, determining at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue, and the second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue.

[0007] In an independently implemented embodiment, the at least two first geological hazard data include at least one first part of geological hazard data existing in a first attribute directory and at least one second part of geological hazard data existing in a second attribute directory, and the preset geological hazard distinction relationship includes a geological hazard data splicing operation between the first part of geological hazard data and the second part of geological hazard data; the generating of a preset geological hazard distinction relationship between the at least two first geological hazard data on the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than the second threshold value includes: on the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than the second threshold value, determining one by one the number of the first part of geological hazard data and the number of the second part of geological hazard data existing in the at least one comparison result queue; on the premise that the number of the first part of geological hazard data is greater than the first geological hazard data number threshold value, and the number of the second part of geological hazard data is greater than the second geological hazard data number threshold value, determining the existence of a geological hazard data splicing operation between the first part of geological hazard data and the second part of geological hazard data.

[0008] In an independently implemented embodiment, each of the disaster description elements has an interval analysis attribute directory; the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological disaster status description information of the at least two first geological disaster data are compared to obtain at least one comparison result queue, including: the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological disaster status description information of the at least two first geological disaster data are analyzed in terms of position to obtain at least one position analysis area and at least two repeated disaster description elements in each position analysis area; in response to each of the position analysis areas, on the premise that the interval period of at least two repeated disaster description elements in the position analysis area meets the preset interval period requirements, an interval period analysis area is determined based on the interval analysis attribute directory of each repeated disaster description element in the position, and the position analysis area and the interval period are analyzed in combination to determine the first comparison result queue.

[0009] In an independently implemented embodiment, the at least two first geological hazard data include at least one first part of geological hazard data in a first attribute directory and at least one second part of geological hazard data in a second attribute directory, the first attribute directory is consistent with or similar to the second attribute directory, and each of the disaster description elements has a location attribute directory; the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological hazard status description information of the at least two first geological hazard data are analyzed in terms of position to obtain at least one location analysis area and at least two repeated disaster description elements in each location analysis area, including: each of the first part of the geological hazard data in the first attribute directory is analyzed in terms of position. Each disaster description element in the second part of the geological disaster data having the second attribute directory is determined as a disaster description element to be processed; from the description information of the implementation geological disaster status of each of the second part of the geological disaster data having the second attribute directory, a target disaster description element that matches the location attribute directory of at least one of the disaster description elements to be processed is determined; in response to each of the target disaster description elements, in combination with the location attribute directory of the target disaster description element and the location attribute directory of at least one disaster description element to be processed corresponding to the target disaster description element, at least one location analysis area is determined, and the target disaster description element and the at least one disaster description element to be processed are both determined as disaster description elements with repeated locations in the location analysis area.

[0010] In an independently implemented embodiment, on the premise that the interval period of at least two repeated disaster description elements in the location analysis area meets the preset interval period requirement, an interval period analysis area is determined based on the interval analysis attribute catalog of each repeated disaster description element, including: determining the interval period segment between every two repeated disaster description elements in combination with the interval analysis attribute catalog of at least two repeated disaster description elements in the location analysis area; on the premise that the minimum interval period segment between the repeated disaster description elements belonging to the geological disaster data with differences in the location analysis area is less than the repeated interval period threshold, determining an interval period analysis area based on the interval analysis attribute catalog of each repeated disaster description element.

[0011] In an independently implemented embodiment, the obtaining of the first implementation geological hazard status description information of each of the at least two first geological hazard data includes: generating the at least two first geological hazard data from the pending geological hazard data cluster based on at least one attribute directory; wherein each of the first geological hazard data exists in one of the at least one attribute directory; based on a previously set time series space, obtaining the first implementation geological hazard status description information of each of the at least two first geological hazard data; wherein the first implementation geological hazard status description information of each of the first geological hazard data includes at least one disaster description element of the first geological hazard data in the time series space.

[0012] In an independently implemented embodiment, the method also includes: in response to each of the second geological hazard data, on the premise of generating an evaluation result between the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data, combined with the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data, generating the association between the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data; based on the association between each of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data, generating and sending a geological hazard evaluation result.

[0013] In a second aspect, a geological hazard assessment system is provided, comprising a processor and a memory communicating with each other, wherein the processor is used to read a computer program from the memory and execute the computer program to implement the above method.

[0014] A geological hazard assessment method and system provided in an embodiment of the present application analyzes the geological hazard hazard conditions of at least two first geological hazard data having consistent or similar attribute directories to obtain at least one comparison result queue, and analyzes the geological hazard hazard conditions of at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue to obtain second geological hazard data that is consistent with the assessment results of the at least two first geological hazard data, thereby improving the performance of analyzing the geological hazard hazard conditions, effectively utilizing important information in the geological hazard hazard conditions, and enabling more accurate acquisition of the geological hazard hazard conditions in a large number of geological hazard hazard conditions, thereby ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the assessment results. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings required for use in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. It should be understood that the following drawings only show certain embodiments of the present application and therefore should not be regarded as limitations on the region. For ordinary technicians in this field, other related drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative work.

[0016] Figure 1 A flow chart of a geological disaster assessment method provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0017] In order to better understand the above technical scheme, the technical scheme of the present application is described in detail below through the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. It should be understood that the embodiments of the present application and the specific features in the embodiments are detailed descriptions of the technical scheme of the present application, rather than limitations on the technical scheme of the present application. In the absence of conflict, the embodiments of the present application and the technical features in the embodiments can be combined with each other.

[0018] See also Figure 1 , shows a method for geological disaster assessment, which may include the technical solutions described in the following steps 100 to 400.

[0019] Step 100, obtaining the first implementation geological disaster status description information of each of at least two first geological disaster data; wherein, the at least two first geological disaster data have consistent or similar attribute directories, and each of the first implementation geological disaster status description information includes at least one disaster description element.

[0020] Step 200, compare the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological disaster status description information of the at least two first geological disaster data to obtain at least one comparison result queue.

[0021] Step 300, determining at least one second geological hazard data in addition to the at least two first geological hazard data existing in the at least one comparison result queue, and the second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue.

[0022] Step 400, in response to each of the second geological hazard data, on the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data is greater than the threshold value of the number of disaster description elements, generates the evaluation results of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data.

[0023] It can be understood that when executing the contents described in the above steps 100 to 200, by analyzing the geological hazard hazard situations of at least two first geological hazard data having consistent or similar attribute directories, at least one comparison result queue is obtained, and the geological hazard hazard situation of at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue is analyzed to obtain second geological hazard data that are consistent with the evaluation results of the at least two first geological hazard data, thereby improving the analysis performance of the geological hazard hazard situation, thereby being able to effectively utilize important information in the geological hazard hazard situation, and being able to more accurately obtain the geological hazard hazard situation in a large number of geological hazard hazard situations, thereby being able to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results.

[0024] In a possible real-time embodiment, the evaluation results of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data are generated on the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data is greater than the threshold value of the number of disaster description elements, including: on the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data is greater than the threshold value of the number of disaster description elements, a comparison result queue of matches for each disaster description element in the second implementation geological hazard status description information is generated; on the premise that the number of comparison result queues of matches for disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information is greater than the first threshold, the evaluation results of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data are generated.

[0025] Based on the above basis, it may also include the following contents: on the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than the second threshold, a preset geological hazard distinguishing relationship is generated between the at least two first geological hazard data; the determination of at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue, and the second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue, includes: on the premise that there is a preset geological hazard distinguishing relationship between the at least two first geological hazard data, determining at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue, and the second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue.

[0026] In a possible real-time embodiment, the at least two first geological hazard data include at least one first part of geological hazard data in a first attribute directory and at least one second part of geological hazard data in a second attribute directory, and the preset geological hazard distinguishing relationship includes a geological hazard data splicing operation between the first part of geological hazard data and the second part of geological hazard data; the generating of the preset geological hazard distinguishing relationship between the at least two first geological hazard data under the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than the second threshold value includes: On the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than the second threshold, the number of the first part of geological hazard data and the number of the second part of geological hazard data existing in the at least one comparison result queue are determined one by one; on the premise that the number of the first part of geological hazard data is greater than the first geological hazard data number threshold, and the number of the second part of geological hazard data is greater than the second geological hazard data number threshold, it is determined that there is a geological hazard data splicing operation between the first part of geological hazard data and the second part of geological hazard data.

[0027] In a possible real-time embodiment, each of the disaster description elements has an interval analysis attribute directory; the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological disaster status description information of the at least two first geological disaster data are compared to obtain at least one comparison result queue, including: The disaster description elements in the first implementation geological disaster status description information of the at least two first geological disaster data are analyzed in terms of position to obtain at least one position analysis area and at least two positionally repeated disaster description elements in each of the position analysis areas; in response to each of the position analysis areas, on the premise that the interval period of at least two positionally repeated disaster description elements in the position analysis area meets the preset interval period requirements, an interval period analysis area is determined based on the interval analysis attribute catalog of each of the positionally repeated disaster description elements, and the position analysis area and the interval period are analyzed in combination to determine a first comparison result queue.

[0028] In a possible real-time embodiment, the at least two first geological hazard data include at least one first part of geological hazard data in a first attribute directory and at least one second part of geological hazard data in a second attribute directory, the first attribute directory is consistent with or similar to the second attribute directory, and each of the disaster description elements has a location attribute directory; the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological hazard status description information of the at least two first geological hazard data are analyzed in terms of location to obtain at least one location analysis area and at least two repeated disaster description elements in each location analysis area, including: each of the first part of the geological hazard data in the first attribute directory is subjected to a location attribute directory. Each disaster description element in the second part of the geological disaster data having the second attribute directory is determined as a disaster description element to be processed; from the description information of the implementation geological disaster status of each of the second part of the geological disaster data having the second attribute directory, a target disaster description element that matches the location attribute directory of at least one of the disaster description elements to be processed is determined; in response to each of the target disaster description elements, in combination with the location attribute directory of the target disaster description element and the location attribute directory of at least one disaster description element to be processed corresponding to the target disaster description element, at least one location analysis area is determined, and the target disaster description element and the at least one disaster description element to be processed are both determined as disaster description elements with repeated locations in the location analysis area.

[0029] In a possible real-time embodiment, on the premise that the interval period of at least two repeated disaster description elements in the location analysis area meets the preset interval period requirement, an interval period analysis area is determined based on the interval analysis attribute catalog of each repeated disaster description element, including: determining the interval period segment between every two repeated disaster description elements in combination with the interval analysis attribute catalog of at least two repeated disaster description elements in the location analysis area; on the premise that the minimum interval period segment between the repeated disaster description elements belonging to the geological disaster data with differences in the location analysis area is less than the repeated interval period threshold, determining an interval period analysis area based on the interval analysis attribute catalog of each repeated disaster description element.

[0030] In a possible real-time embodiment, the obtaining of the first implementation geological hazard status description information of each of the at least two first geological hazard data includes: generating the at least two first geological hazard data from the pending geological hazard data cluster based on at least one attribute directory; wherein each of the first geological hazard data exists in one of the at least one attribute directory; based on a previously set time series space, obtaining the first implementation geological hazard status description information of each of the at least two first geological hazard data; wherein the first implementation geological hazard status description information of each of the first geological hazard data includes at least one disaster description element of the first geological hazard data in the time series space.

[0031] Based on the above basis, it can also include the following contents: in response to each second geological hazard data, on the premise of generating an evaluation result between the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data, combined with the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data, generate the association between the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data; based on the association between each second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data, generate and send a geological hazard evaluation result.

[0032] Under the above premise, a computer-readable storage medium is also provided, on which a computer program stored implements the above method when running.

[0033] In summary, based on the above scheme, by analyzing the geological hazard hazard situations of at least two first geological hazard data with consistent or similar attribute directories, at least one comparison result queue is obtained, and the geological hazard hazard situation of at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue is analyzed to obtain second geological hazard data that are consistent with the evaluation results of the at least two first geological hazard data, thereby improving the analysis performance of the geological hazard hazard situation, thereby being able to effectively utilize important information in the geological hazard hazard situation, and being able to more accurately obtain the geological hazard hazard situation in a large number of geological hazard hazard situations, thereby being able to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results.

[0034] It should be understood that the system and its modules shown above can be implemented in various ways. For example, in some embodiments, the system and its modules can be implemented by hardware, software, or a combination of software and hardware. Among them, the hardware part can be implemented using dedicated logic; the software part can be stored in a memory and executed by an appropriate instruction execution system, such as a microprocessor or a dedicated design hardware. Those skilled in the art will understand that the above methods and systems can be implemented using computer executable instructions and / or included in a processor control code, such as a carrier medium such as a disk, CD or DVD-ROM, a programmable memory such as a read-only memory (firmware), or a data carrier such as an optical or electronic signal carrier. Such code is provided on the carrier medium such as a disk, CD or DVD-ROM, a programmable memory such as a read-only memory (firmware), or a data carrier such as an optical or electronic signal carrier. The system and its modules of the present application can not only be implemented by hardware circuits such as ultra-large-scale integrated circuits or gate arrays, semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable logic devices, etc., but can also be implemented by software such as executed by various types of processors, and can also be implemented by a combination of the above hardware circuits and software (e.g., firmware).

[0035] It should be noted that different embodiments may produce different beneficial effects. In different embodiments, the beneficial effects that may be produced may be any one or a combination of the above, or may be any other beneficial effects that may be obtained.

[0036] The basic concepts have been described above. Obviously, for those skilled in the art, the above detailed disclosure is only an example and does not constitute a limitation of the present application. Although not explicitly stated herein, those skilled in the art may make various modifications, improvements and amendments to the present application. Such modifications, improvements and amendments are suggested in the present application, so such modifications, improvements and amendments still belong to the spirit and scope of the exemplary embodiments of the present application.

[0037] At the same time, the present application uses specific words to describe the embodiments of the present application. For example, "one embodiment", "an embodiment", and / or "some embodiments" refer to a certain feature, structure or characteristic related to at least one embodiment of the present application. Therefore, it should be emphasized and noted that "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" or "an alternative embodiment" mentioned twice or more in different positions in this specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment. In addition, some features, structures or characteristics in one or more embodiments of the present application can be appropriately combined.

[0038] In addition, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various aspects of the present application may be illustrated and described by a number of patentable categories or situations, including any new and useful process, machine, product or combination of substances, or any new and useful improvements thereto. Accordingly, each aspect of the present application may be performed entirely by hardware, entirely by software (including firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.), or by a combination of hardware and software. The above hardware or software may all be referred to as "data blocks", "modules", "engines", "units", "components" or "systems". In addition, various aspects of the present application may be represented as a computer product located in one or more computer-readable media, the product including computer-readable program code.

[0039] A computer storage medium may include a propagated data signal containing computer program code, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. The propagated signal may be in a variety of forms, including electromagnetic, optical, etc., or a suitable combination. A computer storage medium may be any computer-readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium, which can be connected to an instruction execution system, device or apparatus to communicate, propagate or transmit the program for use. The program code on the computer storage medium may be transmitted via any suitable medium, including radio, cable, fiber optic cable, RF, or similar media, or any combination of the above media.

[0040] The computer program codes required for the operation of each part of the present application can be written in any one or more programming languages, including object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, Scala, Smalltalk, Eiffel, JADE, Emerald, C++, C#, VB.NET, Python, etc., conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as C language, Visual Basic, Fortran 2003, Perl, COBOL 2002, PHP, ABAP, dynamic programming languages ​​such as Python, Ruby and Groovy, or other programming languages, etc. The program code can be run entirely on the user's computer, or run on the user's computer as an independent software package, or run partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or run entirely on a remote computer or server. In the latter case, the remote computer can be connected to the user's computer through any network form, such as a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or connected to an external computer (e.g., via the Internet), or in a cloud computing environment, or used as a service such as software as a service (SaaS).

[0041] In addition, unless explicitly stated in the claims, the order of the processing elements and sequences described in the present application, the use of alphanumeric characters, or the use of other names are not intended to limit the order of the processes and methods of the present application. Although the above disclosure discusses some invention embodiments that are currently considered useful through various examples, it should be understood that such details are only for illustrative purposes, and the attached claims are not limited to the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, the claims are intended to cover all modifications and equivalent combinations that are consistent with the essence and scope of the embodiments of the present application. For example, although the system components described above can be implemented by hardware devices, they can also be implemented only by software solutions, such as installing the described system on an existing server or mobile device.

[0042] Similarly, it should be noted that in order to simplify the description of the disclosure of this application and thus help understand one or more embodiments of the invention, in the above description of the embodiments of this application, multiple features are sometimes combined into one embodiment, figure or description thereof. However, this disclosure method does not mean that the features required by the object of this application are more than the features mentioned in the claims. In fact, the features of the embodiments are less than all the features of the single embodiment disclosed above.

[0043] In some embodiments, numbers describing the number of components and attributes are used. It should be understood that such numbers used in the description of the embodiments are modified by the modifiers "about", "approximately" or "substantially" in some examples. Unless otherwise specified, "about", "approximately" or "substantially" indicate that the numbers allow adaptive changes. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the numerical parameters used in the specification and claims are approximate values, which can be changed according to the required characteristics of individual embodiments. In some embodiments, the numerical parameters should take into account the specified significant digits and adopt the general method of retaining the number of digits. Although the numerical domains and parameters used to confirm the breadth of the region in some embodiments of the present application are approximate values, in specific embodiments, the setting of such numerical values ​​is as accurate as possible within the feasible area.

[0044] Each patent, patent application, patent application disclosure, and other materials, such as articles, books, instructions, publications, documents, etc., cited in this application are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Except for application history documents that are inconsistent with or conflicting with the content of this application, documents that limit the broadest area of ​​the claims of this application (currently or later attached to this application) are also excluded. It should be noted that if the description, definition, and / or use of terms in the attached materials of this application are inconsistent or conflicting with the content described in this application, the description, definition, and / or use of terms in this application shall prevail.

[0045] Finally, it should be understood that the embodiments described in this application are only used to illustrate the principles of the embodiments of the present application. Other variations may also belong to the scope of the present application. Therefore, as an example and not a limitation, the alternative configurations of the embodiments of the present application can be considered to be consistent with the teachings of the present application. Accordingly, the embodiments of the present application are not limited to the embodiments explicitly introduced and described in the present application.

[0046] The above are only embodiments of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. For those skilled in the art, the present application may have various changes and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application should be included within the claim area of ​​the present application.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating geological hazards, characterized in that: The method at least comprises: Obtaining first implementation geological disaster status description information of each of at least two first geological disaster data; wherein the at least two first geological disaster data have consistent or similar attribute directories, and each of the first implementation geological disaster status description information includes at least one disaster description element; Comparing the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological disaster situation description information of the at least two first geological disaster data to obtain at least one comparison result queue; Determine at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data existing in the at least one comparison result queue, and second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue; In response to each of the second geological hazard data, an evaluation result of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data is generated on the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data is greater than the threshold value of the number of disaster description elements.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The generating of the evaluation results of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data on the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data is greater than the threshold value of the number of disaster description elements comprises: On the premise that the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological disaster status description information of the second geological disaster data is greater than the disaster description element number threshold, generating a comparison result queue for matching each disaster description element in the second implementation geological disaster status description information; On the premise that the number of comparison result queues matching the disaster description elements in the second implementation geological disaster situation description information is greater than the first threshold, the evaluation results of the second geological disaster data and the at least two first geological disaster data are generated.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that The method further comprises: On the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than a second threshold, generating a preset geological disaster distinguishing relationship between the at least two first geological disaster data; The determining of at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data existing in the at least one comparison result queue, and the second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue, includes: on the premise that there is a preset geological hazard distinguishing relationship between the at least two first geological hazard data, determining at least one second geological hazard data other than the at least two first geological hazard data existing in the at least one comparison result queue, and the second implementation geological hazard status description information of each second geological hazard data in the at least one comparison result queue.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that The at least two first geological hazard data include at least one first part of geological hazard data in a first attribute directory and at least one second part of geological hazard data in a second attribute directory, and the preset geological hazard distinguishing relationship includes a geological hazard data splicing operation between the first part of geological hazard data and the second part of geological hazard data; On the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than the second threshold, generating a preset geological disaster distinguishing relationship between the at least two first geological disaster data includes: On the premise that the number of the comparison result queues is greater than the second threshold, determining one by one the number of the first part of geological hazard data and the number of the second part of geological hazard data existing in the at least one comparison result queue; On the premise that the amount of the first part of geological hazard data is greater than the first geological hazard data amount threshold, and the amount of the second part of geological hazard data is greater than the second geological hazard data amount threshold, it is determined that there is a geological hazard data splicing operation between the first part of geological hazard data and the second part of geological hazard data.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that Each of the disaster description elements has an interval analysis attribute directory; the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological disaster status description information of the at least two first geological disaster data are compared to obtain at least one comparison result queue, including: Analyze the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological disaster status description information of the at least two first geological disaster data in terms of position, and obtain at least one position analysis area and at least two positionally repeated disaster description elements in each of the position analysis areas; In response to each of the location analysis areas, on the premise that the disaster description elements repeated at at least two locations in the location analysis area meet the preset interval period requirements in terms of interval period, an interval period analysis area is determined based on the interval analysis attribute directory of the disaster description elements repeated at each location, and the location analysis area and the interval period are analyzed in combination to determine a first comparison result queue.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that The at least two first geological hazard data include at least one first part of geological hazard data in a first attribute directory and at least one second part of geological hazard data in a second attribute directory, the first attribute directory is consistent with or similar to the second attribute directory, and each of the disaster description elements has a location attribute directory; the disaster description elements in the first implementation geological hazard status description information of the at least two first geological hazard data are analyzed in terms of location to obtain at least one location analysis area and at least two repeated disaster description elements in each of the location analysis areas, including: Determine each disaster description element in the description information of the implementation of the geological disaster situation of the first part of the geological disaster data in the first attribute directory as a disaster description element to be processed; Determine, from each of the second part of the geological disaster data having the second attribute directory, the target disaster description element that matches the location attribute directory of at least one of the disaster description elements to be processed; In response to each of the target disaster description elements, at least one location analysis area is determined in combination with a location attribute catalog of the target disaster description element and a location attribute catalog of at least one disaster description element to be processed corresponding to the target disaster description element, and both the target disaster description element and the at least one disaster description element to be processed are determined as disaster description elements with repeated locations in the location analysis area.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that On the premise that the interval period of the disaster description elements repeated at least two locations in the location analysis area meets the preset interval period requirement, an interval period analysis area is determined based on the interval analysis attribute directory of each of the disaster description elements repeated at the location, including: Determine the interval period segment between every two repeated disaster description elements in the location analysis area in combination with the interval analysis attribute catalog of the repeated disaster description elements at at least two locations; On the premise that the minimum interval period segment between the repeated disaster description elements belonging to the geological disaster data with differences in the location analysis area is less than the repeated interval period threshold, an interval period analysis area is determined based on the interval analysis attribute directory of each repeated disaster description element in the location analysis area.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The step of obtaining first implementation geological disaster status description information of each of at least two first geological disaster data includes: Based on at least one attribute directory, generating at least two first geological hazard data from the pending geological hazard data cluster; wherein each of the first geological hazard data exists in one of the at least one attribute directory; Based on a previously set time series space, obtain the first implementation geological disaster status description information of each of the at least two first geological disaster data; wherein, the first implementation geological disaster status description information of each of the first geological disaster data includes at least one disaster description element of the first geological disaster data in the time series space.

9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The method further comprises: In response to each of the second geological hazard data, on the premise of generating an evaluation result between the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data, combined with the number of disaster description elements in the second implementation geological hazard status description information of the second geological hazard data, generate the association between the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data; Based on the association between each of the second geological hazard data and the at least two first geological hazard data, a geological hazard evaluation result is generated and sent.

10. A geological disaster assessment system, characterized in that: The invention comprises a processor and a memory communicating with each other, wherein the processor is used to read a computer program from the memory and execute the computer program to implement the method according to any one of claims 1 to 9.

Images