A construction plan review method and system

Abstract

The present invention is applicable to the technical field of scheme review, and provides a method for reviewing a construction scheme, the method comprising: obtaining construction information, and obtaining review standards according to the construction information; conducting a multi-dimensional review according to the construction scheme, obtaining review results, comparing the review results with the review standards, and judging whether the construction scheme is qualified according to the comparison results; obtaining a qualified scheme, obtaining key parts according to the qualified scheme, and performing a secondary verification on the key parts, the secondary verification being used to ensure structural safety and correct construction technology; obtaining the review results and the secondary verification results, obtaining insufficient information, the insufficient information being an allowable error within the review standard, proposing modification suggestions for the insufficient information, and sending the modification suggestions to a terminal, thereby solving the problems of being unable to conduct a multi-dimensional review of the construction scheme, being unable to conduct a refined secondary verification on the construction scheme that has passed the review, and being unable to provide modification suggestions for insufficient areas in the review and the secondary verification.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of scheme review, and in particular to a construction scheme review method and system. Background Art

[0002] The construction plan is a very important part of the construction project, which is related to the quality, safety and efficiency of the construction project. There are many types and contents of construction plans in the construction field. The project construction plan is a document material that construction companies need to write a lot on a daily basis, which includes a lot of proofreading and review work. In the current plan, project construction plans are still proofread and reviewed manually, which is labor-intensive for the staff, inefficient and inaccurate for project construction. There is an inability to conduct a multi-dimensional review of the construction plan, and a failure to conduct a detailed secondary review of the construction plan that has passed the review. There is also a failure to provide modification suggestions for deficiencies in the review and secondary review. Summary of the invention

[0003] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method for reviewing a construction plan to solve the technical problems existing in the prior art that a construction plan cannot be reviewed in multiple dimensions, a refined secondary check cannot be performed on a construction plan that has passed the review, and modification suggestions cannot be provided for deficiencies in the review and secondary check.

[0004] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides a construction plan review method, which comprises: Obtaining construction information, including the qualifications and historical records of the construction party, and obtaining audit standards based on the construction information, including national standards, local standards and industry specifications; Conduct a multi-dimensional review based on the construction plan, including technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, obtain the review results, compare the review results with the review standards, and determine whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results; Obtain a qualified plan, obtain key parts according to the qualified plan, the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, and conduct a secondary check on the key parts, the secondary check is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction process; Obtain the audit results and secondary verification results, obtain the deficiency information, which is the allowable error within the audit standard, propose modification suggestions for the deficiency information, and send the modification suggestions to the terminal.

[0005] Preferably, the multi-dimensional review is conducted according to the construction plan, and the multi-dimensional review includes technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, and the steps of obtaining the review results, comparing the review results with the review standards, and judging whether the construction plan is qualified according to the comparison results specifically include: Conduct multi-dimensional audits based on the construction plan, obtain the corresponding weights of each dimension, and build a multi-dimensional audit system based on the dimensions and corresponding weights; Obtain audit results based on a multi-dimensional audit system and compare audit results with audit standards; Obtain the comparison results and determine whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results. If the audit results exceed the audit standards, it is determined to be qualified.

[0006] Preferably, the step of obtaining a qualified solution, obtaining key parts according to the qualified solution, wherein the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, and performing a secondary check on the key parts, wherein the secondary check is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction process, specifically includes: Obtain qualified solutions, and obtain key parts by analyzing the qualified solutions, wherein the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, the construction quality includes construction technology and high-risk construction, and the construction progress includes resource allocation and construction schedule; Perform secondary verification on key parts, wherein the secondary verification adopts a BIM model verification process to obtain a threshold value, and the threshold value is a secondary verification pass line; Compare the verification result with the threshold, obtain the comparison result, and determine the secondary verification result based on the comparison result.

[0007] Preferably, the step of obtaining the audit result and the secondary verification result, obtaining insufficient information, wherein the insufficient information is the allowable error within the audit standard, proposing modification suggestions for the insufficient information, and sending the modification suggestions to the terminal specifically includes: Obtain audit results and secondary verification results, obtain deficiency information, and obtain modification standards based on audit standards; Obtaining modification standards, and generating modification opinions according to the modification standards, wherein the modification opinions are modification opinions for insufficient information; Send modification opinions to the terminal, obtain terminal modification data, and determine whether the modification data meets the review standards and thresholds.

[0008] Preferably, the construction information also includes the city where the project is located and the type of building.

[0009] Another object of an embodiment of the present invention is to provide a construction plan review system, the system comprising: Standard module, obtains construction information, including the construction party's qualifications and construction party's historical records, and obtains audit standards based on the construction information, including national standards, local standards and industry specifications; The audit module conducts a multi-dimensional audit based on the construction plan, including technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, obtains the audit results, compares the audit results with the audit standards, and determines whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results; A secondary verification module obtains a qualified solution, obtains key parts according to the qualified solution, and performs a secondary verification on the key parts. The secondary verification is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction technology. The modification module obtains the audit results and the secondary verification results, obtains the insufficient information, and the insufficient information is the allowable error within the audit standard. Modification suggestions are proposed for the insufficient information and sent to the terminal.

[0010] Preferably, the audit module includes: The audit unit conducts multi-dimensional audits based on the construction plan, obtains the corresponding weights of each dimension, and builds a multi-dimensional audit system based on the dimensions and corresponding weights; Audit result unit, which obtains audit results based on the multi-dimensional audit system and compares the audit results with the audit standards; The first determination unit obtains the comparison result, and determines whether the construction plan is qualified according to the comparison result. If the audit result exceeds the audit standard, it is determined to be qualified.

[0011] Preferably, the secondary verification module includes: Key part unit, obtain qualified solutions, obtain key parts by analyzing qualified solutions, the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, the construction quality includes construction technology and high-risk construction, the construction progress includes resource allocation and construction schedule; A secondary check unit performs secondary check on key parts. The secondary check adopts a BIM model verification process to obtain a threshold value, which is a pass line for the secondary check. The second determination unit compares the verification result with the threshold value, obtains the comparison result, and determines the secondary verification result according to the comparison result.

[0012] Preferably, the modification module includes: For insufficient units, obtain the audit results and secondary verification results, obtain the insufficient information, and obtain the modification standards according to the audit standards; A modification opinion unit, which obtains modification standards and generates modification opinions according to the modification standards, wherein the modification opinions are modification opinions for insufficient information; The information sending unit sends the modification opinions to the terminal, obtains the terminal modification data, and determines whether the modification data meets the review standards and thresholds.

[0013] Preferably, the construction information also includes the city where the project is located and the type of building.

[0014] By adopting the above technical solution, the present invention has the following beneficial effects: The present invention provides a construction plan review method, which obtains construction information, including the construction party's qualifications and construction party's historical records, obtains review standards based on the construction information, and the review standards include national standards, local standards and industry specifications, conducts multi-dimensional review based on the construction plan, obtains corresponding weights of each dimension, builds a multi-dimensional review system based on the dimensions and corresponding weights, obtains review results based on the multi-dimensional review system, compares the review results with the review standards, obtains comparison results, determines whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results, obtains a qualified plan, obtains key parts by analyzing the qualified plan, performs secondary verification on the key parts, and uses the BIM model for the secondary verification Verification process, obtain threshold value, compare verification result with threshold value, obtain comparison result, judge secondary verification result according to comparison result, obtain audit result and secondary verification result, obtain insufficient information, obtain modification standard according to audit standard, obtain modification standard, generate modification opinion according to modification standard, modification opinion is modification opinion for insufficient information, send modification opinion to terminal, obtain terminal modification data, judge whether modification data meets audit standard and threshold value, solve the problems of inability to conduct multi-dimensional audit on construction plan, inability to conduct refined secondary verification on construction plan that has passed audit, and inability to provide modification opinions for deficiencies in audit and secondary verification. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] In order to more clearly illustrate the specific implementation methods of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the specific implementation methods or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are some implementation methods of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0016] Figure 1 A flowchart of a construction plan review method provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 A flowchart of the steps of performing a multi-dimensional audit according to a construction plan, comparing the audit results with the audit standards, and judging whether the construction plan is qualified according to the comparison results provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 A flowchart of the steps of obtaining a qualified solution, obtaining a key part according to the qualified solution, and performing a secondary check on the key part provided in an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4 A flowchart of the steps of obtaining the audit results and the secondary verification results, obtaining the deficiency information, and sending the modification opinions to the terminal provided in an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 5 An architectural diagram of a building construction plan review system provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 6 An architectural diagram of an audit module provided in an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 7 An architectural diagram of a secondary check module provided in an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 8 An architectural diagram of a modification module provided in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0017] The technical solution of the present invention will be described clearly and completely below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0018] In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that the terms "center", "upper", "lower", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "inner", "outer", etc., indicating the orientation or positional relationship, are based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the drawings, and are only for the convenience of describing the present invention and simplifying the description, rather than indicating or implying that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and therefore cannot be understood as limiting the present invention. In addition, the terms "first", "second", and "third" are used for descriptive purposes only, and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0019] In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the terms "installed", "connected", and "connected" should be understood in a broad sense, for example, it can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral connection; it can be a mechanical connection or an electrical connection; it can be a direct connection, or it can be indirectly connected through an intermediate medium, or it can be the internal communication of two components. For ordinary technicians in this field, the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood according to specific circumstances.

[0020] The present invention is further explained below in conjunction with specific implementation modes.

[0021] like Figure 1 As shown, a construction plan review method provided by an embodiment of the present invention includes: S100, obtaining construction information, wherein the construction information includes the construction party's qualifications and construction party's historical records, and obtaining audit standards based on the construction information, wherein the audit standards include national standards, local standards and industry specifications.

[0022] In this step, obtaining construction information, the qualifications and historical records of the construction party is one of the foundations for the review of the construction plan. The qualifications of the construction party are an important basis for evaluating whether it has the ability to execute a specific project. The qualifications of the construction party include general contracting qualifications, professional contracting qualifications and special engineering qualifications. The general contracting qualifications include housing construction engineering and municipal public engineering qualifications. The professional contracting qualifications include foundation, steel structure and waterproofing, anti-corrosion and thermal insulation engineering qualifications. The special engineering qualifications include building demolition and special equipment lifting. The construction party's historical records reflect its past project experience and contract performance capabilities, the type, scale and complexity of completed projects, whether they are similar to the current project, and whether there are quality problems, illegal construction behaviors, and fire safety accident records in past projects; According to the construction information acquisition and review standards, in addition to meeting national standards, local standards must also be met. Local standards are standards that are supplemented or refined by provinces and cities based on their own characteristics, and are also industry specifications for specific fields or special types of projects.

[0023] S200, conduct a multi-dimensional review based on the construction plan, the multi-dimensional review includes technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, obtain the review results, compare the review results with the review standards, and judge whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results.

[0024] In this step, a multi-dimensional review is conducted according to the construction plan. The multi-dimensional review of the construction plan is the key to ensure the scientificity, rationality and compliance of the project plan. It verifies whether the construction process and technical plan meet national and local standards, and determines whether the safety protection measures cover all high-risk processes, such as high-altitude operations, fall prevention measures and mechanical protection. The economic feasibility is reviewed by whether the budget preparation is comprehensive, whether the resource allocation is reasonable and whether there is excessive waste. The rationality of the progress is reviewed by whether the total construction period and key node plans are clear. The environmental impact is reviewed by judging whether the construction plan complies with local environmental protection policies and green construction guidelines; Obtain the audit results, compare the actual audit results with the audit standards item by item, compare the audit results with the audit standards, and determine whether each dimension meets the standards. If all dimensions meet the standards individually, the plan is qualified.

[0025] S300, obtaining a qualified plan, obtaining key parts according to the qualified plan, the key parts including construction quality and construction progress, and performing a secondary check on the key parts, the secondary check is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction process.

[0026] In this step, after obtaining qualified solutions and judging the eligibility of the construction solutions, it is necessary to conduct in-depth analysis and secondary verification of key parts to ensure the structural safety of the project and the correctness of the construction process. The construction quality includes structural safety, material selection and construction process, and the construction progress includes the critical path progress, resource allocation and buffer time. A secondary check is carried out on key parts to verify at a deeper level. The secondary check should cover load-bearing structures, safety nodes and key processes to ensure that the construction process is scientific and reasonable. Recalculation and review should be carried out to ensure that the structural design in the construction plan can bear the actual load, and that the construction process complies with technical specifications to avoid potential errors.

[0027] S400, obtaining the audit results and the secondary verification results, obtaining the insufficient information, the insufficient information being the allowable error within the audit standard, proposing modification suggestions for the insufficient information, and sending the modification suggestions to the terminal.

[0028] In this step, the audit results and secondary verification results are obtained. The preliminary results of the construction plan review usually come from the scores of technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact. The secondary verification results are analyzed through BIM model and simulation technology to verify the process logic, structural safety and resource matching. Combined with the audit results and verification results, a complete evaluation table is generated, listing the scores of each item and whether they meet the standards; Insufficient information refers to the part of the audit or verification that does not fully meet the requirements but is within the allowable error range, usually including technical deviations, resource matching problems and minor structural risks, which are close to the standard line but slightly lower than the specification requirements, and have an impact on the quality and efficiency of the project, but have not reached the critical point; Propose modification suggestions for insufficient information, organize the modification suggestions into clear tables or documents and send them to the terminal. In the review and secondary verification of the construction plan, it is necessary to clarify the deficiencies based on the results, and analyze and improve the allowable errors within the review standards.

[0029] like Figure 2 As shown, as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the multi-dimensional review is performed according to the construction plan, and the multi-dimensional review includes technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, and the steps of obtaining the review result, comparing the review result with the review standard, and judging whether the construction plan is qualified according to the comparison result specifically include: S201, conduct a multi-dimensional review based on the construction plan, obtain the corresponding weights of each dimension, and build a multi-dimensional review system based on the dimensions and corresponding weights.

[0030] In this step, a multi-dimensional review is conducted based on the construction plan to determine whether the technical plan meets national and local standards, whether the safety protection measures cover all high-risk processes, such as high-altitude operations, fall prevention measures and mechanical protection, and whether the budget preparation is comprehensive, whether the resource allocation is reasonable and whether there is excessive waste to review the economic feasibility, whether the total construction period and key node plans are clear to review the rationality of the progress, and whether the construction plan complies with local environmental protection policies and green construction guidelines to review the environmental impact; The importance of each audit dimension may vary depending on the nature and characteristics of the project. The weight allocation needs to reflect the actual needs of the project. Table 1: Weight table

[0031] A multi-dimensional review system is constructed based on the dimensions and corresponding weights. A weighted scoring model is used to combine the actual score of each dimension with the weight to calculate the comprehensive score of the construction plan: Comprehensive score = ∑(dimension score × weight).

[0032] S202, obtaining audit results based on the multi-dimensional audit system, and comparing the audit results with the audit standards.

[0033] In this step, the audit results are obtained according to the multi-dimensional audit system. For example, each dimension corresponds to several specific indicators, and the full score is 100 points. The scoring basis includes national specifications, local standards and industry requirements, etc. The matching degree of process and specifications: 30 points; detailed technical description: 30 points; technical innovation and adaptability: 40 points. Special plan for high-risk operations: 40 points; configuration of safety equipment and facilities: 30 points; emergency plan: 30 points; The audit standards include national standards, local regulations, industry requirements and contract terms. A score of ≥70 in a single dimension is considered qualified, and a weighted comprehensive score of ≥80 is considered qualified. The actual score of each dimension is checked against the standard requirements, the specific indicators that do not meet the standards are confirmed, and the problems are recorded. According to the weight, multiply the score of each dimension by its weight and summarize it to get the comprehensive score: Comprehensive score = ∑ (dimension score × dimension weight) If the comprehensive score meets the requirements and all key dimensions are qualified individually, the construction plan will pass the review; If a key dimension does not meet the standard, even if the overall score is qualified, it still needs to be corrected and then reviewed; Table 2: Comprehensive score table

[0034] S203, obtaining the comparison result, and judging whether the construction plan is qualified according to the comparison result. If the audit result exceeds the audit standard, it is judged to be qualified.

[0035] In this step, the comparison results are obtained. If the audit result is higher than the audit standard, the plan is judged to be qualified. Otherwise, it needs to be corrected and re-audited; For example, in the above example, the comprehensive score is 83.25, which is 80 points higher than the passing line, but the economic and environmental impact dimensions do not meet the standards, so the overall plan needs to be modified and reviewed again.

[0036] like Figure 3 As shown, as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the qualified scheme is obtained, and the key parts are obtained according to the qualified scheme. The key parts include construction quality and construction progress, and the key parts are secondary checked. The secondary check is used to ensure the safety of the structure and the correctness of the construction process, and specifically includes: S301, obtaining a qualified solution, and obtaining key parts by analyzing the qualified solution, wherein the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, the construction quality includes construction technology and high-risk construction, and the construction progress includes resource allocation and construction schedule.

[0037] In this step, a qualified plan is obtained. After the construction plan is reviewed and approved, the core elements of the plan need to be further analyzed. By analyzing the qualified plan, the key parts are obtained, and the two key parts of construction quality and construction progress are extracted for in-depth evaluation. Construction quality is the basis for ensuring the safety and durability of the project. It is necessary to determine whether the construction technology meets national specifications, local standards and design requirements, whether the process is scientific and reasonable, and can effectively avoid quality problems, and the applicability of special technologies, such as prestressed construction, formwork engineering, etc. Clarify whether there are special construction plans and detailed safety measures for the sub-projects with higher risks; For the construction progress, the key parts are whether the manpower, materials and equipment are reasonably allocated according to the plan, whether the construction period plan is scientific and reasonable, whether the tasks on the critical path are arranged compactly, and whether there is buffer time to deal with emergencies; Through secondary verification of construction quality and progress, the project's safety, process feasibility and progress assurance capabilities can be greatly improved, providing solid technical support for the smooth implementation of the project.

[0038] S302, performing secondary verification on the key parts, wherein the secondary verification adopts the BIM model verification process to obtain a threshold value, and the threshold value is the secondary verification pass line.

[0039] In this step, the key parts are rechecked, and the key processes are simulated, analyzed and optimized using BIM (Building Information Modeling) technology. The rationality of the construction process is verified through the recheck, and the logical relationship between the processes is checked to see if there are any conflicts. It is also confirmed whether the design and construction process of the key parts meet the safety requirements. By simulating the construction process, it is verified whether the technical solution meets the actual conditions on site, and the pass line for the check is determined to judge whether the construction quality and progress meet the standards. Through 3D visualization technology and data integration, the BIM model can simulate and analyze key parts of the construction process, dynamically simulate the construction process, check whether there is interference between processes, check whether the spatial layout of different components conflicts, and verify the bearing capacity of key components such as beams, columns and support systems through model loading analysis; Reasonable thresholds are set in the secondary verification to quantitatively judge the eligibility of the construction process. Minimum standards for key parameters are set according to national and local construction specifications. More stringent control standards are formulated based on the complexity of the project or special needs. For example, the compressive strength of concrete must be ≥ 90% of the design strength value. In areas prone to earthquakes, the safety factor of the shear wall's seismic performance is required to be ≥ 1.5.

[0040] S303, comparing the verification result with the threshold, obtaining the comparison result, and determining the secondary verification result according to the comparison result.

[0041] In this step, the verification result is compared with the threshold. By comparing the verification result with the preset threshold, it can be determined whether the verification result meets the requirements. The verification result is compared with the corresponding threshold item by item to determine whether it meets the standard: If the verification result is ≥ the threshold value, the item is qualified; If the verification result is less than the threshold, the item is unqualified and improvement suggestions are required; Fully qualified: All verification items meet or exceed the threshold value, and the construction plan is judged to fully meet the requirements and can pass the verification.

[0042] Partially unqualified: A few verification items did not reach the threshold, but the impact was not significant and could be resolved through local optimization. It was determined that the construction plan needed to be optimized before submission.

[0043] Serious failure: Core verification items (such as structural safety and process logic) fail to reach the threshold, which may lead to construction risks. The construction plan is judged to be unqualified and needs to be significantly adjusted and re-verified.

[0044] like Figure 4 As shown, as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the steps of obtaining the audit result and the secondary verification result, obtaining the insufficient information, the insufficient information being the allowable error within the audit standard, proposing modification suggestions for the insufficient information, and sending the modification suggestions to the terminal specifically include: S401, obtain the audit results and secondary verification results, obtain the deficiency information, and obtain the modification standards according to the audit standards.

[0045] In this step, the audit results and secondary verification results are obtained. The preliminary results of the construction plan review usually come from the scores of technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact. The secondary verification results are analyzed through BIM model and simulation technology to verify the process logic, structural safety and resource matching. Combined with the audit results and verification results, a complete evaluation table is generated, listing the scores of each item and whether they meet the standards; Table 3: Secondary verification results table

[0046] The modification standards are obtained based on the audit standards, and the audit standards are converted into specific modification requirements. For example, if the modification target of the safety factor of the support system is ≥1.5, the modification standard is to increase the number of supporting piles or replace high-strength steel sections. If the modification target for construction process conflicts is 0 times, the BIM model is used to re-simulate the construction process, adjust the excavation sequence and support installation time, optimize the use time of mechanical equipment, and avoid resource conflicts.

[0047] S402, obtaining modification standards, and generating modification opinions according to the modification standards, wherein the modification opinions are modification opinions for insufficient information.

[0048] In this step, the revised standards are obtained. By obtaining the deficiencies in the audit and verification, including the problems of exceeding the standards and the hidden dangers close to the standard range, practical suggestions are put forward according to the revised standards, including: Problem description: clarify the source and impact of the problem, Modification goals: Set specific goals based on the modification standards. Modification measures: propose executable solutions and explain the optimization techniques or methods. Expected effect: explain the positive impact of the modification on the construction plan, For example, the safety factor of the foundation pit support system is insufficient. The actual value is 1.4, which is lower than the standard value of 1.5. There is a risk of structural instability. Two horizontal support piles can be added to reduce the stress on each support pile, or the existing steel material can be replaced from Q235 to Q345 steel to improve its bending and compressive resistance.

[0049] S403, sending modification opinions to the terminal, obtaining terminal modification data, and determining whether the modification data meets the review standards and thresholds.

[0050] In this step, the modification opinions are sent to the terminal. After the modification opinions are proposed and sent to the terminal, the modification data fed back by the terminal needs to be verified to ensure that they meet the review standards and the set thresholds; The data fed back by the terminal should include modified parameters, such as safety factor, process adjustment results, settlement value, etc.; specific improvement measures, and detailed description of the modifications implemented by the construction party; update the model or document, submit the updated construction model or related documents, and compare the modified data with the audit standards and thresholds item by item to verify whether the requirements are met.

[0051] like Figure 5 As shown, a construction plan review system provided by an embodiment of the present invention includes: The standard module 100 is used to obtain construction information, which includes the construction party's qualifications and construction party's historical records, and obtain audit standards based on the construction information. The audit standards include national standards, local standards and industry specifications.

[0052] In this system, the standard module 100 obtains construction information, the qualifications and historical records of the construction party, which is one of the foundations for the review of the construction plan. The qualifications of the construction party are an important basis for evaluating whether it has the ability to execute a specific project. The qualifications of the construction party include general contracting qualifications, professional contracting qualifications and special engineering qualifications. The general contracting qualifications include housing construction engineering and municipal public engineering qualifications. The professional contracting qualifications include foundation, steel structure and waterproof, anti-corrosion and thermal insulation engineering qualifications. The special engineering qualifications include building demolition and special equipment hoisting. The construction party's historical records reflect its past project experience and contract performance capabilities, the type, scale and complexity of completed projects, whether they are similar to the current project, and whether there are quality problems, illegal construction behaviors, and fire safety accident records in past projects; According to the construction information acquisition and review standards, in addition to meeting national standards, local standards must also be met. Local standards are standards that are supplemented or refined by provinces and cities based on their own characteristics, and are also industry specifications for specific fields or special types of projects.

[0053] The audit module 200 is used to conduct a multi-dimensional audit based on the construction plan, and the multi-dimensional audit includes technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, obtain the audit results, compare the audit results with the audit standards, and judge whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results.

[0054] In this system, the audit module 200 conducts a multi-dimensional audit based on the construction plan. The multi-dimensional audit of the construction plan is the key to ensuring the scientificity, rationality and compliance of the engineering plan. It verifies whether the construction process and technical plan meet national and local standards, and determines whether the safety protection measures cover all high-risk processes, such as high-altitude operations, fall prevention measures and mechanical protection. It audits the economy by checking whether the budget preparation is comprehensive, whether the resource allocation is reasonable and whether there is excessive waste. It audits the rationality of the progress by clarifying the total construction period and key node plans. It audits the environmental impact by judging whether the construction plan complies with local environmental protection policies and green construction guidelines. Obtain the audit results, compare the actual audit results with the audit standards item by item, compare the audit results with the audit standards, and determine whether each dimension meets the standards. If all dimensions meet the standards individually, the plan is qualified.

[0055] The secondary verification module 300 is used to obtain a qualified solution, obtain key parts according to the qualified solution, and the key parts include construction quality and construction progress. The key parts are secondary verified to ensure structural safety and correct construction process.

[0056] In this system, the secondary verification module 300 obtains qualified solutions. After judging the eligibility of the construction solution, it is necessary to conduct in-depth analysis and secondary verification of the key parts to ensure the structural safety of the project and the correctness of the construction process. The construction quality includes structural safety, material selection and construction process, and the construction progress includes the critical path progress, resource allocation and buffer time; A secondary check is carried out on key parts to verify at a deeper level. The secondary check should cover load-bearing structures, safety nodes and key processes to ensure that the construction process is scientific and reasonable. Recalculation and review should be carried out to ensure that the structural design in the construction plan can bear the actual load, and that the construction process complies with technical specifications to avoid potential errors.

[0057] The modification module 400 is used to obtain the audit results and the secondary verification results, obtain the insufficient information, the insufficient information is the allowable error within the audit standard, propose modification suggestions for the insufficient information, and send the modification suggestions to the terminal.

[0058] In this system, the modification module 400 obtains the audit results and the secondary verification results. The preliminary results of the construction plan review usually come from the scores of technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact. The secondary verification results are analyzed by verifying the process logic, structural safety and resource matching through BIM model and simulation technology. Combined with the audit results and verification results, a complete evaluation table is generated, listing the scores of each item and whether they meet the standards; Insufficient information refers to the part of the audit or verification that does not fully meet the requirements but is within the allowable error range, usually including technical deviations, resource matching problems and minor structural risks, which are close to the standard line but slightly lower than the specification requirements, and have an impact on the quality and efficiency of the project, but have not reached the critical point; Propose modification suggestions for insufficient information, organize the modification suggestions into clear tables or documents and send them to the terminal. In the review and secondary verification of the construction plan, it is necessary to clarify the deficiencies based on the results, and analyze and improve the allowable errors within the review standards.

[0059] like Figure 6 As shown, as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the audit module 200 includes: The audit unit 201 is used to perform a multi-dimensional audit according to the construction plan, obtain the corresponding weight of each dimension, and build a multi-dimensional audit system according to the dimensions and the corresponding weights.

[0060] In this module, the review unit 201 conducts a multi-dimensional review based on the construction plan to check whether the technical plan complies with national and local standards, determine whether the safety protection measures cover all high-risk processes, such as high-altitude operations, fall prevention measures and mechanical protection, review the economic feasibility by checking whether the budget preparation is comprehensive, whether the resource allocation is reasonable and whether there is excessive waste, review the rationality of the progress by clarifying the total construction period and key node plans, and review the environmental impact by judging whether the construction plan complies with local environmental protection policies and green construction guidelines; The importance of each audit dimension may vary depending on the nature and characteristics of the project. The weight allocation needs to reflect the actual needs of the project. Table 1: Weight table

[0061] A multi-dimensional review system is constructed based on the dimensions and corresponding weights. A weighted scoring model is used to combine the actual score of each dimension with the weight to calculate the comprehensive score of the construction plan: Comprehensive score = ∑(dimension score × weight).

[0062] The audit result unit 202 is used to obtain the audit results according to the multi-dimensional audit system and compare the audit results with the audit standards.

[0063] In this module, the audit result unit 202 obtains the audit results according to the multi-dimensional audit system. For example, each dimension corresponds to several specific indicators, and a full score system of 100 points is adopted. The scoring basis includes national specifications, local standards and industry requirements, etc. The matching degree of process and specifications: 30 points; the detailedness of technical description: 30 points; the innovation and adaptability of technology: 40 points. Special plan for high-risk operations: 40 points; the configuration of safety equipment and facilities: 30 points; emergency plan: 30 points; The audit standards include national standards, local regulations, industry requirements and contract terms. A score of ≥70 in a single dimension is considered qualified, and a weighted comprehensive score of ≥80 is considered qualified. The actual score of each dimension is checked against the standard requirements, the specific indicators that do not meet the standards are confirmed, and the problems are recorded. According to the weight, multiply the score of each dimension by its weight and summarize it to get the comprehensive score: Comprehensive score = ∑ (dimension score × dimension weight) If the comprehensive score meets the requirements and all key dimensions are qualified individually, the construction plan will pass the review; If a key dimension does not meet the standard, even if the overall score is qualified, it still needs to be corrected and then reviewed; Table 2: Comprehensive score table

[0064] The first determination unit 203 is used to obtain the comparison result, and determine whether the construction plan is qualified according to the comparison result. If the audit result exceeds the audit standard, it is determined to be qualified.

[0065] In this module, the first determination unit 203 obtains the comparison result. If the audit result is higher than the audit standard, the solution is determined to be qualified. Otherwise, it needs to be corrected and re-audited. For example, in the above example, the comprehensive score is 83.25, which is 80 points higher than the passing line, but the economic and environmental impact dimensions do not meet the standards, so the overall plan needs to be modified and reviewed again.

[0066] like Figure 7 As shown, as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the secondary verification module 300 includes: The key part unit 301 is used to obtain qualified solutions. The key parts are obtained by analyzing the qualified solutions. The key parts include construction quality and construction progress. The construction quality includes construction technology and high-risk construction. The construction progress includes resource allocation and construction schedule.

[0067] In this module, the key part unit 301 obtains the qualified plan. After the construction plan is reviewed and qualified, it is necessary to further analyze the core elements of the plan. By analyzing the qualified plan, the key parts are obtained, and the two key parts of construction quality and construction progress are extracted for in-depth evaluation. Construction quality is the basis for ensuring the safety and durability of the project. It is necessary to determine whether the construction technology meets national specifications, local standards and design requirements, whether the process is scientific and reasonable, and can effectively avoid quality problems, and the applicability of special technologies, such as prestressed construction, formwork engineering, etc. Clarify whether there are special construction plans and detailed safety measures for the sub-projects with higher risks; For the construction progress, the key parts are whether the manpower, materials and equipment are reasonably allocated according to the plan, whether the construction period plan is scientific and reasonable, whether the tasks on the critical path are arranged compactly, and whether there is buffer time to deal with emergencies; Through secondary verification of construction quality and progress, the project's safety, process feasibility and progress assurance capabilities can be greatly improved, providing solid technical support for the smooth implementation of the project.

[0068] The secondary verification unit 302 is used to perform a secondary verification on the key parts. The secondary verification adopts the BIM model verification process to obtain a threshold value, and the threshold value is the secondary verification pass line.

[0069] In this module, the secondary verification unit 302 conducts secondary verification on the key parts, simulates, analyzes and optimizes the key processes using BIM (Building Information Modeling) technology, verifies the rationality of the construction processes through secondary verification, checks whether the logical relationship between the processes is reasonable and whether there are conflicts, confirms whether the design and construction process of the key parts meet the safety requirements, verifies whether the technical solution meets the actual conditions on site through simulating the construction process, and determines the pass line for verification, which is used to judge whether the construction quality and progress meet the standards; Through 3D visualization technology and data integration, the BIM model can simulate and analyze key parts of the construction process, dynamically simulate the construction process, check whether there is interference between processes, check whether the spatial layout of different components conflicts, and verify the bearing capacity of key components such as beams, columns and support systems through model loading analysis; Reasonable thresholds are set in the secondary verification to quantitatively judge the eligibility of the construction process. Minimum standards for key parameters are set according to national and local construction specifications. More stringent control standards are formulated based on the complexity of the project or special needs. For example, the compressive strength of concrete must be ≥ 90% of the design strength value. In areas prone to earthquakes, the safety factor of the shear wall's seismic performance is required to be ≥ 1.5.

[0070] The second determination unit 303 is used to compare the verification result with the threshold, obtain the comparison result, and determine the secondary verification result according to the comparison result.

[0071] In this module, the second determination unit 303 compares the verification result with the threshold value. By comparing the verification result with the preset threshold value, it can be determined whether the verification result meets the requirements. The verification result is compared with the corresponding threshold value item by item to determine whether it meets the standard: If the verification result is ≥ the threshold value, the item is qualified; If the verification result is less than the threshold, the item is unqualified and improvement suggestions are required; Fully qualified: All verification items meet or exceed the threshold value, and the construction plan is judged to fully meet the requirements and can pass the verification.

[0072] Partially unqualified: A few verification items did not reach the threshold, but the impact was not significant and could be resolved through local optimization. It was determined that the construction plan needed to be optimized before submission.

[0073] Serious failure: Core verification items (such as structural safety and process logic) fail to reach the threshold, which may lead to construction risks. The construction plan is judged to be unqualified and needs to be significantly adjusted and re-verified.

[0074] like Figure 8 As shown, as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the modification module 400 includes: The deficiency unit 401 is used to obtain the audit results and the secondary verification results, obtain the deficiency information, and obtain the modification standard according to the audit standard.

[0075] In this module, the audit results and secondary verification results are obtained from unit 401. The preliminary results of the construction plan review usually come from the scores of technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact. The secondary verification results are analyzed through BIM model and simulation technology to verify the process logic, structural safety and resource matching. Combined with the audit results and verification results, a complete evaluation table is generated, listing the scores of each item and whether they meet the standards; Table 3: Secondary verification results table

[0076] The modification standards are obtained based on the audit standards, and the audit standards are converted into specific modification requirements. For example, if the modification target of the safety factor of the support system is ≥1.5, the modification standard is to increase the number of supporting piles or replace high-strength steel sections. If the modification target for construction process conflicts is 0 times, the BIM model is used to re-simulate the construction process, adjust the excavation sequence and support installation time, optimize the use time of mechanical equipment, and avoid resource conflicts.

[0077] The modification suggestion unit 402 is used to obtain modification standards and generate modification suggestions according to the modification standards. The modification suggestions are modification suggestions for insufficient information.

[0078] In this module, the modification opinion unit 402 obtains the modification standard, obtains the deficiency information in the review and verification, including the problem of exceeding the standard and the hidden danger close to the standard range, and puts forward operational suggestions according to the modification standard, including: Problem description: clarify the source and impact of the problem, Modification goals: Set specific goals based on the modification standards. Modification measures: propose executable solutions and explain the optimization techniques or methods. Expected effect: explain the positive impact of the modification on the construction plan, For example, the safety factor of the foundation pit support system is insufficient. The actual value is 1.4, which is lower than the standard value of 1.5. There is a risk of structural instability. Two horizontal support piles can be added to reduce the stress on each support pile, or the existing steel material can be replaced from Q235 to Q345 steel to improve its bending and compressive resistance.

[0079] The information sending unit 403 is used to send modification opinions to the terminal, obtain terminal modification data, and determine whether the modification data meets the review standards and thresholds.

[0080] In this module, the information sending unit 403 sends the modification opinions to the terminal. After the construction plan proposes the modification opinions and sends them to the terminal, the modification data fed back by the terminal needs to be verified to ensure that it meets the review standards and the set thresholds; The data fed back by the terminal should include modified parameters, such as safety factor, process adjustment results, settlement value, etc.; specific improvement measures, and detailed description of the modifications implemented by the construction party; update the model or document, submit the updated construction model or related documents, and compare the modified data with the audit standards and thresholds item by item to verify whether the requirements are met.

[0081] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, the computer device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented: Obtaining construction information, including the qualifications and historical records of the construction party, and obtaining audit standards based on the construction information, including national standards, local standards and industry specifications; Conduct a multi-dimensional review based on the construction plan, including technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, obtain the review results, compare the review results with the review standards, and determine whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results; Obtain a qualified plan, obtain key parts according to the qualified plan, the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, and conduct a secondary check on the key parts, the secondary check is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction process; Obtain the audit results and secondary verification results, obtain the deficiency information, which is the allowable error within the audit standard, propose modification suggestions for the deficiency information, and send the modification suggestions to the terminal.

[0082] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the processor performs the following steps: Obtaining construction information, including the qualifications and historical records of the construction party, and obtaining audit standards based on the construction information, including national standards, local standards and industry specifications; Conduct a multi-dimensional review based on the construction plan, including technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, obtain the review results, compare the review results with the review standards, and determine whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results; Obtain a qualified plan, obtain key parts according to the qualified plan, the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, and conduct a secondary check on the key parts, the secondary check is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction process; Obtain the audit results and secondary verification results, obtain the deficiency information, which is the allowable error within the audit standard, propose modification suggestions for the deficiency information, and send the modification suggestions to the terminal.

[0083] It should be understood that, although each step in the flow chart of each embodiment of the present invention is shown in sequence according to the indication of the arrow, these steps are not necessarily performed in sequence according to the order indicated by the arrow. Unless there is a clear explanation in this article, the execution of these steps does not have a strict order restriction, and these steps can be performed in other orders. Moreover, at least a portion of the steps in each embodiment may include a plurality of sub-steps or a plurality of stages, and these sub-steps or stages are not necessarily performed at the same time, but can be performed at different times, and the execution order of these sub-steps or stages is not necessarily performed in sequence, but can be performed in turn or alternately with at least a portion of other steps or sub-steps or stages of other steps.

[0084] Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to memory, storage, database or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application may include non-volatile and / or volatile memory. Non-volatile memory may include read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM) or flash memory. Volatile memory may include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in many forms, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link (Synchlink) DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus (Rambus) direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM).

[0085] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or replace some or all of the technical features therein with equivalents. However, these modifications or replacements do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A construction plan review method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtaining construction information, including the qualifications and historical records of the construction party, and obtaining audit standards based on the construction information, including national standards, local standards and industry specifications; Conduct a multi-dimensional review based on the construction plan, including technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, obtain the review results, compare the review results with the review standards, and determine whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results; Obtain a qualified plan, obtain key parts according to the qualified plan, the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, and conduct a secondary check on the key parts, the secondary check is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction process; Obtain the audit results and secondary verification results, obtain insufficient information, the insufficient information is the allowable error within the audit standard, propose modification suggestions for the insufficient information, and send the modification suggestions to the terminal.

2. A construction plan review method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The multi-dimensional review is conducted according to the construction plan, and the multi-dimensional review includes technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, and the steps of obtaining the review results, comparing the review results with the review standards, and judging whether the construction plan is qualified according to the comparison results specifically include: Conduct multi-dimensional audits based on the construction plan, obtain the corresponding weights of each dimension, and build a multi-dimensional audit system based on the dimensions and corresponding weights; Obtain audit results based on a multi-dimensional audit system and compare audit results with audit standards; Obtain the comparison results and determine whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results. If the audit results exceed the audit standards, it is determined to be qualified.

3. A construction plan review method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of obtaining a qualified solution, obtaining key parts according to the qualified solution, wherein the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, and performing a secondary check on the key parts, wherein the secondary check is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction process, specifically includes: Obtain qualified solutions, and obtain key parts by analyzing the qualified solutions, wherein the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, the construction quality includes construction technology and high-risk construction, and the construction progress includes resource allocation and construction schedule; Perform secondary verification on key parts, wherein the secondary verification adopts a BIM model verification process to obtain a threshold value, and the threshold value is a secondary verification pass line; Compare the verification result with the threshold, obtain the comparison result, and determine the secondary verification result based on the comparison result.

4. A construction plan review method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The step of obtaining the audit result and the secondary verification result, obtaining insufficient information, wherein the insufficient information is the allowable error within the audit standard, proposing modification suggestions for the insufficient information, and sending the modification suggestions to the terminal specifically includes: Obtain audit results and secondary verification results, obtain deficiency information, and obtain modification standards based on audit standards; Obtaining modification standards, and generating modification opinions according to the modification standards, wherein the modification opinions are modification opinions for insufficient information; Send modification opinions to the terminal, obtain terminal modification data, and determine whether the modification data meets the review standards and thresholds.

5. A construction plan review method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The construction information also includes the city where the project is located and the type of building.

6. A construction plan review system, characterized in that: The system comprises: Standard module, obtains construction information, including the construction party's qualifications and construction party's historical records, and obtains audit standards based on the construction information, including national standards, local standards and industry specifications; The audit module conducts a multi-dimensional audit based on the construction plan, including technical feasibility, safety, economy, schedule rationality and environmental impact, obtains the audit results, compares the audit results with the audit standards, and determines whether the construction plan is qualified based on the comparison results; A secondary verification module obtains a qualified solution, obtains key parts according to the qualified solution, and performs a secondary verification on the key parts. The secondary verification is used to ensure structural safety and correct construction technology. The modification module obtains the audit results and the secondary verification results, obtains the insufficient information, and the insufficient information is the allowable error within the audit standard. Modification suggestions are proposed for the insufficient information and sent to the terminal.

7. A construction plan review system according to claim 6, characterized in that: The audit module includes: The audit unit conducts multi-dimensional audits based on the construction plan, obtains the corresponding weights of each dimension, and builds a multi-dimensional audit system based on the dimensions and corresponding weights; Audit result unit, which obtains audit results based on the multi-dimensional audit system and compares the audit results with the audit standards; The first determination unit obtains the comparison result, and determines whether the construction plan is qualified according to the comparison result. If the audit result exceeds the audit standard, it is determined to be qualified.

8. A construction plan review system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The secondary verification module comprises: Key part unit, obtain qualified solutions, obtain key parts by analyzing qualified solutions, the key parts include construction quality and construction progress, the construction quality includes construction technology and high-risk construction, the construction progress includes resource allocation and construction schedule; A secondary check unit performs secondary check on key parts. The secondary check adopts a BIM model verification process to obtain a threshold value, which is a pass line for the secondary check. The second determination unit compares the verification result with the threshold value, obtains the comparison result, and determines the secondary verification result according to the comparison result.

9. A construction plan review system according to claim 8, characterized in that: The modification module comprises: For insufficient units, obtain the audit results and secondary verification results, obtain the insufficient information, and obtain the modification standards according to the audit standards; A modification opinion unit, which obtains modification standards and generates modification opinions according to the modification standards, wherein the modification opinions are modification opinions for insufficient information; The information sending unit sends the modification opinions to the terminal, obtains the terminal modification data, and determines whether the modification data meets the review standards and thresholds.

10. A construction plan review system according to claim 9, characterized in that: The construction information also includes the city where the project is located and the type of building.

Images