A method and system for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency devices in a frequency agile state, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

This invention provides a method, system, electronic device, and storage medium for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-hopping devices in a frequency-agile state. The method includes: calculating the spectrum compatibility of the first device transmitting / receiving at a first operating frequency and the second device receiving / transmitting at a second operating frequency combination; if both spectrum compatibility results are compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum-compatible; repeating the above steps to obtain the spectrum compatibility results for all operating frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of incompatible spectrum combinations to the total number of operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined spectrum conflict probability threshold between frequency-hopping devices, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict. The solution proposed in this invention can clearly define the spectrum compatibility status between frequency-agile devices and fixed-frequency devices, as well as between frequency-agile devices themselves.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the field of electromagnetic interference analysis and calculation technology, and specifically relates to a method, system, electronic device and storage medium for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility. Background Technology

[0002] The electromagnetic interference between frequency-using devices affects whether they can operate normally simultaneously. For frequency-using devices operating at fixed frequencies, the electromagnetic interference can be calculated using electromagnetic interference equations. However, the spectrum of frequency-agile devices changes rapidly, and there is no good calculation method to determine the spectral compatibility between frequency-agile devices and fixed-frequency devices, as well as among frequency-agile devices themselves.

[0003] Therefore, how to provide a method, system, electronic device and storage medium for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility has become a technical problem that urgently needs to be solved in this field. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of this invention is to provide a method, system, electronic device, and storage medium for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility conditions.

[0005] According to a first aspect of the present invention, a method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility is provided, comprising:

[0006] Step S1: When the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives, and obtain the first spectrum compatibility result.

[0007] Step S2: When the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, calculate the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives, and obtain the second spectrum compatibility result.

[0008] Step S3: If both the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, they are spectrum incompatible.

[0009] Step S4: Traverse the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the operating frequency combination of the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat steps S1 to S3, and obtain the spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations.

[0010] Step S5: Count the number of all operating frequency combinations; count the number of incompatible spectra of all operating frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of incompatible spectra of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than the predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectrum conflict probability threshold, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict.

[0011] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, the spectral compatibility of the first device transmitting and the second device receiving is calculated to obtain a first spectral compatibility result, including:

[0012] When the first device emits, calculate the radiated power density at the second device;

[0013] Calculate the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna;

[0014] Calculate the first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device.

[0015] The second interference power is calculated based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency;

[0016] If the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, then the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility.

[0017] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, when the first device emits, calculating the radiated power density at the second device includes:

[0018]

[0019] Among them, P A G is the transmission power of the first device; A R is the antenna gain of the first device in the direction of the second device; R is the distance between the first device and the second device.

[0020] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, calculating the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0021]

[0022]

[0023] Among them, B r G represents the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna. B For the receiving antenna gain of the second device; The wavelength received by the second device is denoted by c; the speed of light is denoted by f. B This is the second operating frequency.

[0024] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, calculating the first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0025] The first interference power is obtained by multiplying the radiated power density at the second device by the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device.

[0026] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S1, calculating the second interference power based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency includes:

[0027] The second interference power is obtained by dividing the first interference power by the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency.

[0028] According to the method of the first aspect of the present invention, in step S5, the typical value of the predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectral conflict probability threshold is 30%.

[0029] A second aspect of this invention discloses a spectrum compatibility calculation system for frequency-using devices under frequency agility conditions; the system includes:

[0030] The first processing module is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility of the first device transmitting and the second device receiving when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, and obtain a first spectrum compatibility result.

[0031] The second processing module is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits at the first operating frequency and the second device receives at the second operating frequency, and obtain a second spectrum compatibility result.

[0032] The third processing module is configured to, if both the first and second spectrum compatibility results are compatible, then the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, they are spectrum incompatible.

[0033] The fourth processing module is configured to traverse the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the operating frequency combination of the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat the first processing module to the third processing module, and obtain the spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations.

[0034] The fifth processing module is configured to: count the number of all operating frequency combinations; count the number of spectral incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations; and if the ratio of the number of spectral incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectral conflict probability threshold, then the first device and the second device will have a spectral conflict.

[0035] A third aspect of this invention discloses an electronic device. The electronic device includes a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, it implements the steps in the method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility as described in any of the first aspects of this disclosure.

[0036] A fourth aspect of this invention discloses a computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of a method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility, as described in any of the first aspects of this disclosure.

[0037] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows:

[0038] As can be seen from the above scheme, the embodiments of the present invention provide a method, system, electronic device and storage medium for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency-agile conditions, which has the following beneficial effects: it can clarify the spectrum compatibility status between frequency-agile devices and fixed-frequency devices, as well as between frequency-agile devices, and provide an effective technical means for spectrum compatibility analysis of frequency-agile devices. Attached Figure Description

[0039] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility conditions, according to an embodiment.

[0040] Figure 2 This is a structural diagram of a frequency compatibility calculation system for frequency-adaptive devices under frequency-scaling conditions, according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0041] Figure 3 This is a structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0042] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this invention clearer, the technical solutions of the embodiments of this invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some, not all, of the embodiments of this invention. Based on the embodiments of this invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this invention.

[0043] Example 1:

[0044] According to a first aspect of the present invention, the present invention discloses a method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility conditions. Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-consuming devices under frequency agility conditions according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as... Figure 1As shown, the method includes:

[0045] Step S1: When the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives, and obtain the first spectrum compatibility result.

[0046] Step S2: When the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, calculate the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives, and obtain the second spectrum compatibility result.

[0047] Step S3: If both the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, they are spectrum incompatible.

[0048] Step S4: Traverse the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the operating frequency combination of the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat steps S1 to S3, and obtain the spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations.

[0049] Step S5: Count the number of all operating frequency combinations; count the number of incompatible spectra of all operating frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of incompatible spectra of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than the predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectrum conflict probability threshold, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict.

[0050] In step S1, when the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, the first device calculates the spectrum compatibility when transmitting and the second device receives, and obtains the first spectrum compatibility result.

[0051] In some embodiments, in step S1, when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, the first device calculates the spectrum compatibility when transmitting and the second device receives, and obtains the first spectrum compatibility result, including:

[0052] When the first device emits, calculate the radiated power density at the second device;

[0053] Calculate the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna;

[0054] Calculate the first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device.

[0055] The second interference power is calculated based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency;

[0056] If the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, then the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility.

[0057] When the first device emits, the calculation of the radiated power density at the second device includes:

[0058]

[0059] Among them, P A G is the transmission power of the first device; A R is the antenna gain of the first device in the direction of the second device; R is the distance between the first device and the second device.

[0060] The calculation of the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna includes:

[0061]

[0062]

[0063] Among them, B r G represents the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna. B For the receiving antenna gain of the second device; The wavelength received by the second device is denoted by c; the speed of light is denoted by f. B This is the second operating frequency.

[0064] The calculation of the first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0065] The first interference power is obtained by multiplying the radiated power density at the second device by the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna.

[0066] .

[0067] The step of calculating the second interference power based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency includes:

[0068] The second interference power is obtained by dividing the first interference power by the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency.

[0069] .

[0070] Specifically, the main parameters of the first and second devices are as follows: the frequency hopping set of the first device is [A1, A2, ..., A...]. m There are a total of m frequency points, and the transmit power of the first device is P. A The antenna gain of the first device is G. AThe sensitivity level of the first device is S. A The frequency hopping set of the second device is [B1, B2, …, B n There are a total of n frequency points, and the transmission power of the second device is P. B The antenna gain of the second device is G. B The sensitivity level of the second device is S. B The distance between the first device and the second device is R.

[0071] In step S2, when the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, the first device calculates the spectrum compatibility when transmitting and the first device receives, and obtains the second spectrum compatibility result.

[0072] Specifically, the radiated power density S at the first device when the second device emits is calculated as follows:

[0073]

[0074] Among them, P B For the transmission power of the second device, G B The antenna gain of the second device in the direction of the first device. The interference power P received by the antenna of the sensitive device. r for

[0075]

[0076] A r The effective receiving area of ​​the first device's receiving antenna can be expressed as:

[0077]

[0078] For the first device to receive wavelength, G A The gain of the receiving antenna of the first device is denoted as . Represented as

[0079]

[0080] c is the speed of light; thus, the relationship between interference power and transmitter power can be expressed as:

[0081]

[0082] The second device operates at frequency f. B Transmission, frequency f A If the sideband suppression is L, then the interference power at the receiving frequency is

[0083]

[0084] The sensitivity level of the first device is S.A If P r >S A Then the first device uses f A Receiver, second device with f B If the two frequencies are incompatible or conflict during transmission, they are compatible otherwise.

[0085] In step S3, if both the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, they are spectrum incompatible.

[0086] Specifically, if the first or second device only transmits or only receives, the spectrum compatibility result is the result calculated under a single operating condition.

[0087] In step S5, the number of all operating frequency combinations is counted; the number of spectral incompatibilities among all operating frequency combinations is counted; if the ratio of the number of spectral incompatibilities among all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectral conflict probability threshold, then the first device and the second device have a spectral conflict.

[0088] In some embodiments, the typical value of the predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectral conflict probability threshold is 30%.

[0089] In summary, the solution proposed in this invention can clearly define the spectrum compatibility status between frequency-agile devices and fixed-frequency devices, as well as between frequency-agile devices, providing an effective technical means for spectrum compatibility analysis of frequency-agile devices.

[0090] Example 2:

[0091] This invention discloses a spectrum compatibility calculation system for frequency-using devices under frequency agility conditions. Figure 2 This is a structural diagram of a frequency compatibility calculation system for frequency-adaptive devices under frequency agility conditions, according to an embodiment of the present invention; as shown. Figure 2 As shown, the system 100 includes:

[0092] The first processing module 101 is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits at the first operating frequency and the second device receives at the second operating frequency, and obtain the first spectrum compatibility result.

[0093] The second processing module 102 is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits at the first operating frequency and the second device receives at the second operating frequency, and obtain a second spectrum compatibility result.

[0094] The third processing module 103 is configured such that if both the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, they are spectrum incompatible.

[0095] The fourth processing module 104 is configured to traverse the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the operating frequency combination of the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat the first processing module to the third processing module, and obtain the spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations.

[0096] The fifth processing module 105 is configured to count the number of all operating frequency combinations; count the number of spectral incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations; and if the ratio of the number of spectral incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectral conflict probability threshold, then the first device and the second device will have a spectral conflict.

[0097] According to the system of the second aspect of the present invention, the first processing module 101 is specifically configured to, when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives, and obtain a first spectrum compatibility result including:

[0098] When the first device emits, calculate the radiated power density at the second device;

[0099] Calculate the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna;

[0100] Calculate the first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device.

[0101] The second interference power is calculated based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency;

[0102] If the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, then the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility.

[0103] When the first device emits, the calculation of the radiated power density at the second device includes:

[0104]

[0105] Among them, P A G is the transmission power of the first device; A R is the antenna gain of the first device in the direction of the second device; R is the distance between the first device and the second device.

[0106] The calculation of the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna includes:

[0107]

[0108]

[0109] Among them, B r G represents the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna. B For the receiving antenna gain of the second device; The wavelength received by the second device is denoted by c; the speed of light is denoted by f. B This is the second operating frequency.

[0110] The calculation of the first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes:

[0111] The first interference power is obtained by multiplying the radiated power density at the second device by the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna.

[0112] .

[0113] The step of calculating the second interference power based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency includes:

[0114] The second interference power is obtained by dividing the first interference power by the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency.

[0115] .

[0116] Specifically, the main parameters of the first and second devices are as follows: the frequency hopping set of the first device is [A1, A2, ..., A...]. m There are a total of m frequency points, and the transmit power of the first device is P. A The antenna gain of the first device is G. A The sensitivity level of the first device is S. A The frequency hopping set of the second device is [B1, B2, …, B n There are a total of n frequency points, and the transmission power of the second device is P. B The antenna gain of the second device is G. B The sensitivity level of the second device is S. B The distance between the first device and the second device is R.

[0117] According to the system of the second aspect of the present invention, the second processing module 102 is specifically configured to calculate the radiated power density S at the first device when the second device emits.

[0118]

[0119] Among them, P B For the transmission power of the second device, G B The antenna gain of the second device in the direction of the first device. The interference power P received by the antenna of the sensitive device. r for

[0120]

[0121] A r The effective receiving area of ​​the first device's receiving antenna can be expressed as:

[0122]

[0123] For the first device to receive wavelength, G A The gain of the receiving antenna of the first device is denoted as . Represented as

[0124]

[0125] c is the speed of light; thus, the relationship between interference power and transmitter power can be expressed as:

[0126]

[0127] The second device operates at frequency f. B Transmission, frequency f A If the sideband suppression is L, then the interference power at the receiving frequency is

[0128]

[0129] The sensitivity level of the first device is S. A If P r >S A Then the first device uses f A Receiver, second device with f B If the two frequencies are incompatible or conflict during transmission, they are compatible otherwise.

[0130] According to the system of the second aspect of the present invention, the third processing module 103 is specifically configured such that if the first device or the second device only transmits or only receives, the spectrum compatibility result is a single-condition calculation result.

[0131] According to the system of the second aspect of the present invention, the fifth processing module 105 is specifically configured such that the typical value of the predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectral conflict probability threshold is 30%.

[0132] Example 3:

[0133] This application discloses an electronic device. The electronic device includes a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, it implements the steps in the method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility in any of the embodiments of this invention, as disclosed in Embodiment 1.

[0134] Figure 3 This is a structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention, such as... Figure 3 As shown, the electronic device includes a processor, memory, communication interface, display screen, and input device connected via a system bus. The processor provides computing and control capabilities. The memory includes non-volatile storage media and internal memory. The non-volatile storage media stores the operating system and computer programs. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer programs stored in the non-volatile storage media. The communication interface is used for wired or wireless communication with external terminals; wireless communication can be achieved through Wi-Fi, carrier networks, Near Field Communication (NFC), or other technologies. The display screen can be an LCD screen or an e-ink screen. The input device can be a touch layer covering the display screen, buttons, a trackball, or a touchpad mounted on the device's casing, or an external keyboard, touchpad, or mouse.

[0135] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 3 The structure shown is merely a structural diagram of the part related to the technical solution of this disclosure and does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device to which the solution of this application is applied. The specific electronic device may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.

[0136] Example 4:

[0137] This invention discloses a computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of a method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency-agile conditions, as described in any of Embodiment 1 of this invention.

[0138] Please note that the technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. For the sake of brevity, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments have been described. However, as long as the combination of these technical features does not contradict each other, it should be considered within the scope of this specification. The above embodiments only illustrate several implementation methods of this application, and their descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, but they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention patent. It should be pointed out that for those skilled in the art, several modifications and improvements can be made without departing from the concept of this application, and these all fall within the protection scope of this application. Therefore, the protection scope of this patent application should be determined by the appended claims.

[0139] The embodiments of the subject matter and functional operation described in this specification can be implemented in the following ways: digital electronic circuits, tangibly embodied computer software or firmware, computer hardware including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or combinations thereof. Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer programs, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a tangible, non-transitory program carrier for execution by a data processing apparatus or for controlling the operation of a data processing apparatus. Alternatively or additionally, the program instructions may be encoded on artificially generated propagation signals, such as machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signals, which are generated to encode information and transmit it to a suitable receiving device for execution by the data processing apparatus. The computer storage medium may be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memory device, or combinations thereof.

[0140] The processing and logic flow described in this specification can be executed by one or more programmable computers that execute one or more computer programs to perform corresponding functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processing and logic flow can also be executed by dedicated logic circuitry—such as FPGAs (Field-Programmable Gate Arrays) or ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits), and the device can also be implemented as dedicated logic circuitry.

[0141] Suitable computers for executing computer programs include, for example, general-purpose and / or special-purpose microprocessors, or any other type of central processing unit. Typically, the central processing unit receives instructions and data from read-only memory and / or random access memory. The basic components of a computer include a central processing unit for implementing or executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Typically, a computer will also include one or more mass storage devices for storing data, such as disks, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks, or the computer will be operatively coupled to such mass storage devices to receive data from or transfer data to them, or both. However, a computer is not required to have such devices. Furthermore, a computer can be embedded in another device, such as a mobile phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile audio or video player, a game console, a global positioning system (GPS) receiver, or a portable storage device such as a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive, to name a few.

[0142] Computer-readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media, and memory devices, such as semiconductor memory devices (e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices), magnetic disks (e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks), magneto-optical disks, and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. Processors and memory may be supplemented by or incorporated into dedicated logic circuitry.

[0143] While this specification contains numerous specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of any invention or the scope of the claims, but rather are primarily intended to describe features of specific embodiments of a particular invention. Certain features described in the various embodiments herein may also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features described in a single embodiment may also be implemented separately in various embodiments or in any suitable sub-combination. Furthermore, while features may function in certain combinations as described above and even initially claimed in this way, one or more features from a claimed combination may be removed from that combination in some cases, and a claimed combination may refer to a sub-combination or a variation thereof.

[0144] Similarly, although the operations are depicted in a specific order in the accompanying drawings, this should not be construed as requiring these operations to be performed in the specific order shown or sequentially, or requiring all illustrated operations to be performed to achieve the desired result. In some cases, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Furthermore, the separation of various system modules and components in the above embodiments should not be construed as requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products.

[0145] Thus, specific embodiments of the subject matter have been described. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions recited in the claims may be performed in a different order and still achieve the desired result. Furthermore, the processes depicted in the drawings are not necessarily shown in a specific order or sequence to achieve the desired result. In some implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous.

[0146] The above are preferred embodiments of the present invention. It should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, several improvements and modifications can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these improvements and modifications should also be considered within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility conditions, characterized in that, include: Step S1: When the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits and the second device receives, and obtain the first spectrum compatibility result. Step S2: When the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, calculate the spectrum compatibility when the second device transmits and the first device receives, and obtain the second spectrum compatibility result. Step S3: If both the first spectrum compatibility result and the second spectrum compatibility result are compatible, the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, they are spectrum incompatible. Step S4: Traverse the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the operating frequency combination of the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat steps S1 to S3, and obtain the spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations. Step S5: Count the number of all operating frequency combinations; count the number of incompatible spectra of all operating frequency combinations; if the ratio of the number of incompatible spectra of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than the predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectrum conflict probability threshold, then the first device and the second device have a spectrum conflict. In step S1, when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, the spectrum compatibility of the first device transmitting and the second device receiving is calculated to obtain a first spectrum compatibility result. This includes: calculating the radiated power density at the second device when the first device transmits; calculating the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device; calculating the first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device; calculating the second interference power based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency; if the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, then the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility.

2. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In step S1, when the first device emits, calculating the radiated power density at the second device includes: Among them, P A G is the transmission power of the first device; A R is the antenna gain of the first device in the direction of the second device; R is the distance between the first device and the second device.

3. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In step S1, calculating the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna includes: Among them, B r G represents the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna. B For the receiving antenna gain of the second device; The wavelength received by the second device is denoted by c; the speed of light is denoted by f. B This is the second operating frequency.

4. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In step S1, calculating the first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device includes: The first interference power is obtained by multiplying the radiated power density at the second device by the effective receiving area of ​​the receiving antenna of the second device.

5. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In step S1, calculating the second interference power based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency includes: The second interference power is obtained by dividing the first interference power by the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency.

6. The method for calculating spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility as described in claim 1, characterized in that, In step S5, the typical value of the predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectrum conflict probability threshold is 30%.

7. A spectrum compatibility calculation system for frequency-using equipment under frequency agility conditions, characterized in that, The system includes: A first processing module is configured to, when the first device operates at a first operating frequency and the second device operates at a second operating frequency, calculate the spectrum compatibility of the first device transmitting and the second device receiving, and obtain a first spectrum compatibility result. The calculation of the spectrum compatibility of the first device transmitting and the second device receiving, when the first device operates at the first operating frequency and the second device operates at the second operating frequency, to obtain the first spectrum compatibility result includes: calculating the radiated power density at the second device during transmission; calculating the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna; calculating a first interference power at the receiving frequency based on the radiated power density at the second device and the effective receiving area of ​​the second device's receiving antenna; calculating a second interference power based on the first interference power and the sideband suppression of the second operating frequency; if the second interference power at the receiving frequency is greater than the sensitivity level of the second device, then the first spectrum compatibility result is spectrum incompatibility. The second processing module is configured to calculate the spectrum compatibility when the first device transmits at the first operating frequency and the second device receives at the second operating frequency, and obtain a second spectrum compatibility result. The third processing module is configured to, if both the first and second spectrum compatibility results are compatible, then the first device at the first operating frequency and the second device at the second operating frequency are spectrum compatible; otherwise, they are spectrum incompatible. The fourth processing module is configured to traverse the frequency hopping frequency set of the first device and the operating frequency combination of the frequency hopping frequency set of the second device, repeat the first processing module to the third processing module, and obtain the spectrum compatibility results of all operating frequency combinations. The fifth processing module is configured to: count the number of all operating frequency combinations; count the number of spectral incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations; and if the ratio of the number of spectral incompatibilities of all operating frequency combinations to the number of all operating frequency combinations is greater than a predefined inter-frequency hopping device spectral conflict probability threshold, then the first device and the second device will have a spectral conflict.

8. An electronic device, characterized in that, The electronic device includes a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program. When the processor executes the computer program, it implements the steps in the method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps in the method for calculating the spectrum compatibility between frequency-using devices under frequency agility as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images