Locomotive quality maintenance process control method and system

Abstract

The invention provides a locomotive quality maintenance process control method and system, and belongs to the technical field of vehicle maintenance, and the method comprises the steps: creating an inspection task according to a maintenance plan, and transmitting the inspection task to a target quality inspection worker, the inspection task comprises a plurality of to-be-inspected nodes and corresponding inspection contents, receiving delivery inspection data fed back by the target quality inspection personnel according to the delivery inspection task, performing multi-dimensional evaluation on the delivery inspection data according to a preset evaluation standard, determining a completion state of the delivery inspection task according to a multi-dimensional evaluation result, generating an electronic tag when the completion state of the delivery inspection task is successful completion, and sending the electronic tag to the target quality inspection personnel. And determining the execution progress of the maintenance plan according to the electronic tag. The invention aims to improve the problems of high traceability difficulty and relatively weak monitoring performance of the existing scheme.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of vehicle maintenance, and in particular to a method and system for controlling a locomotive quality maintenance process. Background Art

[0002] In the railway industry, locomotive quality inspection and maintenance is a key link to ensure railway transportation safety and improve enterprise operation efficiency. With the continuous growth of railway transportation demand, the locomotive quality inspection and maintenance system has been continuously developed, especially the "locomotive maintenance three inspections and one verification system" has been widely used in locomotive maintenance. As an efficient quality control system, it ensures the safety and reliability of locomotives.

[0003] The traditional "three inspections and one verification" system specifically includes four links: initial inspection, re-inspection, final inspection and acceptance. Each link has a clear division of responsibilities and quality standards to ensure that every process in the locomotive maintenance process meets the standards. However, the traditional locomotive maintenance work model is facing more and more challenges in the digital age. The existing methods are difficult to trace and have weak monitorability. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present application provides a method and system for controlling a locomotive quality inspection process. The present application adopts the following technical solutions:

[0005] In a first aspect, a locomotive quality inspection process control method is provided, the method comprising:

[0006] Create inspection tasks according to the maintenance plan and send them to target quality inspectors. The inspection tasks include multiple nodes to be inspected and their corresponding inspection contents.

[0007] Receive inspection data fed back by target quality inspectors based on inspection tasks;

[0008] Conduct multi-dimensional evaluation of the inspection data according to the preset evaluation criteria, and determine the completion status of the inspection task based on the multi-dimensional evaluation results;

[0009] When the completion status of the inspection task is successful, an electronic label is generated;

[0010] Determine the execution progress of the maintenance plan based on the electronic tags.

[0011] In an embodiment of the first aspect of the present application, a check task is created according to a maintenance plan, and the check task includes a first check task and a second check task, including:

[0012] Determine multiple points to be repaired according to the repair plan;

[0013] Determine the first inspection task based on the matching result between the inspection point and the inspection route;

[0014] The second inspection task is determined based on the matching results between the inspection content and the maintenance standards.

[0015] In an embodiment of the first aspect of the present application, a multi-dimensional evaluation is performed on the inspection data according to a preset evaluation standard, and a completion status of the inspection task is determined according to the multi-dimensional evaluation result;

[0016] Determine the first evaluation result of the inspection data according to the accuracy matching result between the inspection data and the standard data;

[0017] Determine the second evaluation result of the inspection data according to the matching result between the upload time of the inspection data and the standard upload time;

[0018] The completion status of the inspection task is determined based on the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the corresponding weights.

[0019] In an embodiment of the first aspect of the present application, the method further comprises:

[0020] Dynamically adjust the inspection tasks according to the execution progress of the maintenance plan.

[0021] In the second aspect, based on the same inventive concept, a locomotive quality inspection process control system is provided, the system comprising:

[0022] The task distribution module is used to create inspection tasks according to the maintenance plan and distribute the inspection tasks to the target quality inspectors. The inspection tasks include multiple nodes to be inspected and their corresponding inspection contents.

[0023] A receiving module is used to receive the inspection data fed back by the target quality inspector according to the inspection task;

[0024] An evaluation module is used to perform a multi-dimensional evaluation on the inspection data according to preset evaluation criteria, and determine the completion status of the inspection task according to the multi-dimensional evaluation results;

[0025] The label issuing module is used to generate an electronic label when the completion status of the inspection task is successfully completed;

[0026] The determination module is used to determine the execution progress of the maintenance plan based on the electronic tags.

[0027] In an embodiment of the second aspect of the present application, the task issuing module includes:

[0028] A submodule for determining the points to be repaired is used to determine multiple points to be repaired according to the repair plan;

[0029] Determine the first inspection task based on the matching result between the inspection point and the inspection route;

[0030] The second inspection task is determined based on the matching results between the inspection content and the maintenance standards.

[0031] In an embodiment of the second aspect of the present application, the evaluation module includes:

[0032] Determine the first evaluation result of the inspection data according to the accuracy matching result between the inspection data and the standard data;

[0033] Determine the second evaluation result of the inspection data according to the matching result between the upload time of the inspection data and the standard upload time;

[0034] The completion status of the inspection task is determined based on the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the corresponding weights.

[0035] In an embodiment of the second aspect of the present application, the system further includes:

[0036] The dynamic correction module is used to dynamically adjust the inspection tasks according to the execution progress of the maintenance plan.

[0037] In a third aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, which includes computer instructions. When the computer instructions are executed on a terminal device (such as a mobile phone), the terminal device executes the method described in the first aspect and any possible design thereof.

[0038] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer program product, which, when executed on a terminal device, enables the terminal device to execute the method described in the first aspect and any possible design thereof.

[0039] In summary, the above locomotive quality inspection process control method and system have the following technical effects:

[0040] By creating inspection tasks and sending them to target quality inspectors, the system can record each maintenance node and its corresponding inspection content. After each task is completed, the relevant data will be fed back and stored for subsequent traceability and auditing. By evaluating the inspection data in multiple dimensions, the system can not only analyze the completion status of the task, but also provide detailed execution records of the task, ensuring that each link is traceable, significantly improving the traceability capability. In the traditional maintenance mode, monitoring and evaluating the progress and quality of maintenance usually rely on manual inspection, making it difficult to grasp the entire process of task execution in real time, and the evaluation standards may be subjective, affecting work efficiency and quality. Through the above method, the system receives and evaluates the inspection data in real time, and uses preset standards to conduct multi-dimensional analysis of the completion of the task, thereby effectively monitoring each link of the maintenance process. The system can provide real-time feedback on progress and quality issues, making it easy to make adjustments in a timely manner, ensuring that the maintenance tasks are completed on time and meet the quality standards, and greatly improving the monitorability. In traditional locomotive maintenance work, the maintenance progress is usually difficult to accurately grasp, resulting in inflexible scheduling. By receiving the inspection data and determining the execution progress of the maintenance plan based on the electronic tags, the system can update the task progress in real time and dynamically adjust the subsequent work. This digital progress management method makes the entire maintenance process more transparent and the progress clearer. Managers can identify bottlenecks and adjust resource allocation in a timely manner, thereby improving overall efficiency. : In the traditional model, decisions often rely on manual experience and there is a certain degree of uncertainty. Through the multi-dimensional evaluation of the inspection data, the system can provide data-driven decision support to help managers understand the completion of tasks, identify problems in a timely manner, and take effective measures. This data-based decision support can effectively reduce human errors and improve the accuracy and reliability of maintenance work. Through the multi-dimensional analysis of the inspection data by preset evaluation standards, the system can evaluate whether the task is completed as required, and then send electronic tags to the quality inspectors when the task is successfully completed as quality verification and progress confirmation. This standardized and automated process can reduce human intervention, improve the quality and efficiency of maintenance work, and ensure that tasks are completed efficiently and accurately.

[0041] Through the implementation of the above methods, the problems of difficult traceability and weak monitoring in the traditional locomotive maintenance model have been effectively solved. The creation and management of digital inspection tasks not only improves the transparency and controllability of the entire maintenance process, but also monitors progress and quality in real time, provides data-driven decision support, and thus greatly improves work efficiency and quality. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0042] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the steps of a locomotive quality inspection process control method provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0043] Figure 2A schematic diagram of the functional modules of a locomotive quality inspection process control system provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0044] The terms used in the following embodiments are only for the purpose of describing specific embodiments, and are not intended to be used as limitations to the present application. As used in the specification and appended claims of the present application, the singular expressions "one", "a kind of", "", "above", "the" and "this" are intended to also include expressions such as "one or more", unless there is a clear contrary indication in the context. It should also be understood that in the following embodiments of the present application, "at least one", "one or more" refer to one or more than two (including two). The character " / " generally indicates that the objects associated before and after are in a "or" relationship.

[0045] The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all of the embodiments.

[0046] In the following, the terms "first", "second", etc. are used only for convenience of description and should not be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of the indicated technical features. Thus, a feature defined as "first", "second", etc. may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of the features. In the description of this application, unless otherwise specified, "plurality" means two or more. For example, a plurality of processing units refers to two or more processing units.

[0047] In addition, in the embodiments of the present application, "upper", "lower", "left" and "right" are not limited to being defined relative to the orientation of the components schematically placed in the drawings. It should be understood that these directional terms can be relative concepts, which are used for description and clarification relative to the components, and can change accordingly according to the change in the orientation of the components placed in the drawings. In the drawings, for the sake of clarity, the thickness of the layers and regions is exaggerated, and the size ratio relationship between the parts in the drawings does not reflect the actual size ratio relationship.

[0048] In the embodiments of the present application, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the term "connection" should be understood in a broad sense. For example, "connection" can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral connection; it can be a direct connection or an indirect connection through an intermediate medium. In addition, the term "electrical connection" can be a direct electrical connection or an indirect electrical connection through an intermediate medium.

[0049] In the embodiments of the present application, the term "module" is generally a functional structure divided according to logic, and the "module" can be implemented by pure hardware, or by a combination of software and hardware. In the embodiments of the present application, "and / or" describes the association relationship of associated objects, indicating that three relationships can exist. For example, A and / or B can represent: A exists alone, B exists alone, and A and B exist at the same time.

[0050] In the embodiments of the present application, words such as "exemplary" or "for example" are used to indicate examples, illustrations or descriptions. Any embodiment or design described as "exemplary" or "for example" in the embodiments of the present application should not be interpreted as being more preferred or more advantageous than other embodiments or designs. Specifically, the use of words such as "exemplary" or "for example" is intended to present related concepts in a specific way.

[0051] The technical solution in this application will be described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

[0052] At present, in the process of locomotive maintenance, it is difficult to trace the source and the monitoring is relatively weak. This is mainly reflected in the previous aspects.

[0053] (1) Lack of inspection planning makes it difficult to fully and effectively implement paperless quality records

[0054] After the informatization construction of the locomotive workshop in recent years, the electronic construction of locomotive registered repair has made great progress, but some problems have also been found. For example, the acceptance link has not yet been planned and constructed. According to the previous model, quality inspectors are required to organize relevant quality records for inspection. The inspectors first check the completeness and rationality of the information. After the information is passed, they go to the site for physical inspection and physical account verification. After all are qualified, the certificate of conformity is issued; due to the lack of inspection planning, although paper records have been cancelled in the production link, relevant records still need to be printed in the final inspection link, resulting in repeated labor and waste of resources; at the same time, the inspectors lack supporting technical means and cannot grasp the preparation status of each inspection link in real time. They can only passively wait for the workshop to report, which is not conducive to work plan arrangement and it is difficult to actively coordinate with the workshop production to improve efficiency.

[0055] (2) Lack of automated quality control checks during the inspection and acceptance process

[0056] The integrity and compliance of information is an important part of the inspection during the inspection and acceptance process. The traditional inspection and acceptance method requires quality inspectors and acceptors to conduct each process one by one, which is not only inefficient but also easy to be misread, bringing hidden dangers to quality inspection and acceptance.

[0057] (3) Lack of open item management and slow work process

[0058] During the locomotive maintenance process, due to factors such as materials, the preceding processes may sometimes fail to be completed, affecting the subsequent processes and causing poor flow in certain links, which has an adverse effect on the locomotive production cycle.

[0059] In order to solve the above problems, the present application provides a locomotive quality inspection process control method, which may specifically include the following steps:

[0060] S101: Create an inspection task according to the maintenance plan, and send the inspection task to the target quality inspector. The inspection task includes multiple nodes to be inspected and their corresponding inspection contents.

[0061] In this embodiment, according to the maintenance plan of the locomotive, the system automatically generates inspection tasks. These tasks include various maintenance nodes and corresponding specific maintenance contents. For example, if a locomotive needs to undergo maintenance of the locomotive power system, brake system inspection, electrical equipment inspection, etc., the system will generate corresponding tasks according to different maintenance plans to ensure that each item that needs to be inspected is covered. The information in the maintenance plan includes: Maintenance cycle and time node: Determine the maintenance time of the locomotive and set the maintenance plan in advance to avoid omissions. Maintenance category: Including preventive maintenance, routine maintenance, fault maintenance, etc., different types of maintenance tasks will have different key inspection items. Locomotive components and systems: Generate maintenance tasks according to different components of the locomotive (such as engine, transmission system, brake system, electrical system, etc.) to ensure that the maintenance of each component can be covered. Expected standards and inspection specifications: Each task node will be associated with the corresponding inspection standard to ensure that the execution of the task meets the quality requirements. After the task is created, the system will automatically send the task to the designated quality inspector. Each task will contain detailed information about the node to be inspected, as well as the inspection standards and inspection requirements of the node. The basis for assigning tasks is usually based on comprehensive factors such as the professional ability, workload, experience, etc. of the quality inspector, to ensure that each task is completed by the right person.

[0062] The specific steps include:

[0063] S1011: Determine multiple points to be repaired according to the repair plan;

[0064] S1012: Determine the first inspection task according to the matching result between the inspection point and the inspection route;

[0065] S1013: Determine the second inspection task according to the matching result between the inspection content and the inspection standard.

[0066] In the implementation of S1011 to S1013, the locomotive components to be inspected are determined according to the time period and type in the maintenance plan. For example, a certain period may be specifically for inspection of the electrical system, brake system, power system, etc., while another period may focus on the body appearance or other auxiliary systems of the locomotive. Each point to be inspected is usually a specific equipment component, subsystem or functional point, such as an engine, wheel set, brake, wheel, hydraulic system, battery, electrical circuit, etc.

[0067] By matching the points to be inspected with the maintenance route, the first round of inspection tasks (i.e., the first phase tasks) are determined. This step ensures the systematization and organization of the tasks, making the maintenance process both efficient and orderly. The maintenance route refers to the path or sequence in which the quality inspector conducts a step-by-step inspection of the locomotive when performing maintenance tasks. Usually, there is a certain logical relationship and sequence between the different systems of the locomotive (such as the power system, braking system, electrical system, etc.). For example, when inspecting the locomotive power system, it may be necessary to check the engine first, then the gearbox, and finally the transmission system. All these inspections are usually performed in a certain order. In some maintenance plans, certain points to be inspected may have a higher priority. For example, parts involving safety systems (such as the braking system) may be prioritized at the front of the maintenance route.

[0068] Determine the order of maintenance and the execution order of each task based on the relationship between the maintenance route and the points to be inspected. The first inspection task may include critical components that need to be inspected first. The first inspection task is usually divided according to the order of the points to be inspected in the maintenance route. For example, if the brake system is the first inspection point, the first inspection task will include inspection content related to the brake system.

[0069] There is usually a set of standards and specifications for the specific inspection content of each inspection point. For example, the inspection of the brake system may require the inspection of the thickness of the brake pads, and the inspection of the battery may require the testing of the voltage and charging status. These inspection contents and standards help guide quality inspectors to perform targeted operations and ensure that all maintenance work meets the specified quality requirements. The second inspection task will further refine and deepen the specific inspection tasks of each maintenance point. For example, the first inspection task may only include a comprehensive inspection of the brake system, while the second inspection task may require in-depth details such as the replacement of brake fluid, cleaning of brake discs, and system testing.

[0070] Through these three steps, the entire locomotive maintenance process can be managed scientifically and systematically, ensuring that each maintenance link can be carried out according to plan, thereby improving maintenance efficiency, ensuring locomotive safety, and meeting quality management requirements.

[0071] S102: receiving inspection data fed back by target quality inspectors according to the inspection task.

[0072] In this embodiment, after receiving the inspection task, the target quality inspector can collect relevant data in real time through digital tools (such as mobile terminals, special software, smart devices, etc.). These data include but are not limited to: inspection results (such as whether it meets the standards, whether it is qualified, whether there are defects, etc.). Specific test values ​​(such as temperature, pressure, degree of wear, etc.). Problems and anomalies during the inspection process (such as component damage, system failure, etc.). Completion status and work progress of the acceptance node.

[0073] Inspection data is uploaded to the digital system in real time. This process can be completed through automated data collection equipment (such as sensors, intelligent testing instruments) or through manual data input by quality inspectors. The uploaded inspection data will be automatically compared with the preset acceptance standards to determine whether it meets the requirements and form an automatic inspection conclusion.

[0074] S103: Perform multi-dimensional evaluation on the inspection data according to preset evaluation criteria, and determine the completion status of the inspection task according to the multi-dimensional evaluation results.

[0075] In this implementation, it is necessary to conduct a multi-faceted and comprehensive analysis of the collected inspection data, conduct a quantitative evaluation of the data through preset standards, and finally draw an evaluation conclusion. The evaluation standards usually cover multiple dimensions, such as technical requirements, quality standards, performance indicators, etc. These standards are used to compare and judge the inspection data to ensure whether the inspection task meets the expected goals. If the evaluation results show that all indicators meet the requirements, the task status is "completed", otherwise further correction or processing is required. This link is crucial to ensuring the scientificity, accuracy and traceability of the entire inspection process, and also ensures that various maintenance tasks are standardized and optimized during execution. The specific steps include:

[0076] S1031: Determine a first evaluation result of the inspection data according to the accuracy matching result between the inspection data and the standard data;

[0077] S1032: Determine a second evaluation result of the inspection data according to a matching result between the upload time of the inspection data and the standard upload time;

[0078] S1033: Determine the completion status of the inspection task according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the corresponding weights.

[0079] In the implementation of S1031 to S1033, the first evaluation result of the inspection data is determined based on the accuracy matching result of the inspection data and the standard data. This means that the system will compare the inspection data with the preset standard data, evaluate the accuracy between the data, and determine whether the inspection data meets the quality requirements or technical standards. If the difference between the inspection data and the standard data is small, it means that the task is executed more accurately and the evaluation result is high; if the difference is large, it means that there is a deviation in the data and the evaluation result is correspondingly low. Next, the second evaluation result of the inspection data is determined based on the matching result of the upload time of the inspection data and the standard upload time. This step focuses on the timeliness of the inspection data upload. The system will compare the actual upload time with the upload time required by the standard to evaluate whether the task is completed on time. If the inspection data is uploaded on time, the evaluation result is high, otherwise a low evaluation is obtained. These two evaluation results will be combined with weights for comprehensive evaluation, and finally determine the completion status of the inspection task. In this step, the system will perform weighted calculation based on the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and their corresponding weight values ​​to obtain a comprehensive evaluation score, and then determine whether the inspection task has achieved the predetermined goal and can be regarded as "completed". If the weighted results meet the set completion criteria, the task is marked as "completed"; if not, the task still needs further processing or correction.

[0080] S104: When the completion status of the inspection task is successful, an electronic tag is generated.

[0081] In this embodiment, when the completion status of the inspection task is judged as "successfully completed", the system will generate an electronic label. Specifically, this means that when the inspection task is comprehensively evaluated, all standards and requirements have been met, and the task is considered to be successfully completed. At this time, the system will automatically generate an electronic label, which serves as an identification and record of the completion of the task. The electronic label not only provides the completion information of the task, but also may contain key information such as detailed data of the task, evaluation results, date and time, which is convenient for tracking and management. Further, when the acceptance node is qualified, an electronic certificate is usually issued as a certificate of the acceptance process. The electronic certificate is a formal confirmation of the inspection task results, proving that the task has passed the quality inspection and meets all relevant requirements. The electronic certificate usually contains information such as the details of the qualified task, quality inspection standards, evaluation results, issuer and issuance time. This process not only ensures the compliance of the task, but also facilitates subsequent review, supervision and quality traceability.

[0082] S105: Determine the execution progress of the maintenance plan according to the electronic tag.

[0083] In this embodiment, the system monitors the execution progress of the maintenance plan in real time according to the timestamp and task status in the electronic tag. For example, if a certain stage of the task has been completed and passed the quality inspection, the system will update the progress and mark the stage as "completed". The system will compare the actual progress of the completed task with the scheduled maintenance plan. If the task is completed on time and meets the quality standards, the system will confirm that the progress is normal; if there is a delay or the task is not completed according to the standard, the system will prompt an abnormality or lag, and remind the relevant personnel to adjust and deal with it in time. If the feedback of the electronic tag shows that there is a deviation or lag in some links of the maintenance plan, the system can adjust the subsequent maintenance task arrangement according to the actual situation. For example, resources may be redeployed or the execution time of certain tasks may be extended to ensure the smooth progress of the entire maintenance plan. In this way, the electronic tag not only serves as an acceptance certificate, but also reflects the progress of the task in real time, helping relevant managers to grasp the execution of the maintenance plan, ensuring that various tasks are completed on time and according to quality requirements, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of maintenance work.

[0084] In a feasible implementation, the method further includes: dynamically adjusting the inspection task according to the execution progress of the maintenance plan.

[0085] In this embodiment, by real-time monitoring of the progress of maintenance tasks, the system can track the completion of tasks, promptly identify tasks that are behind schedule or ahead of schedule, and adjust the execution order and time nodes of subsequent tasks according to the execution status of the tasks. When it is found that a task is not completed as planned, the system can rearrange resources, adjust the order of tasks, or increase resources to speed up the progress to ensure that the overall maintenance plan can be completed within a reasonable time frame. If the task is completed ahead of schedule, the system can adjust the arrangement of subsequent tasks according to resource conditions, so as to make more efficient use of existing resources. In addition, the system will dynamically adjust the time nodes in the plan based on the execution progress and quality feedback to avoid the smooth implementation of subsequent tasks due to quality problems or delays, ensure the flexibility and efficiency of the entire maintenance plan, and ultimately improve the accuracy and overall efficiency of task execution.

[0086] The method provided by this application, by creating an inspection task and sending it to the target quality inspector, the system can record each maintenance node and its corresponding inspection content. After each task is completed, the relevant data will be fed back and stored, which is convenient for subsequent tracing and auditing. By evaluating the inspection data in multiple dimensions, the system can not only analyze the completion status of the task, but also provide detailed execution records of the task, ensuring that each link is traceable, significantly improving the traceability. In the traditional maintenance mode, monitoring and evaluating the progress and quality of maintenance usually rely on manual inspection, making it difficult to grasp the entire process of task execution in real time, and the evaluation criteria may be subjective, affecting work efficiency and quality. Through the above method, the system receives and evaluates the inspection data in real time, and uses the preset standards to perform multi-dimensional analysis on the completion of the task, so as to effectively monitor each link of the maintenance process. The system can feedback progress and quality issues in real time, facilitate timely adjustments, ensure that the maintenance tasks are completed on time and meet the quality standards, and greatly improve the monitorability. In traditional locomotive maintenance work, the maintenance progress is usually difficult to accurately grasp, resulting in inflexible scheduling. By receiving the inspection data and determining the execution progress of the maintenance plan based on the electronic tags, the system can update the task progress in real time and dynamically adjust the subsequent work. This digital progress management method makes the entire maintenance process more transparent and the progress clearer. Managers can identify bottlenecks and adjust resource allocation in a timely manner, thereby improving overall efficiency. : In the traditional model, decisions often rely on manual experience and there is a certain degree of uncertainty. Through the multi-dimensional evaluation of the inspection data, the system can provide data-driven decision support to help managers understand the completion of tasks, identify problems in a timely manner, and take effective measures. This data-based decision support can effectively reduce human errors and improve the accuracy and reliability of maintenance work. Through the multi-dimensional analysis of the inspection data by preset evaluation standards, the system can evaluate whether the task is completed as required, and then send electronic tags to the quality inspectors when the task is successfully completed as quality verification and progress confirmation. This standardized and automated process can reduce human intervention, improve the quality and efficiency of maintenance work, and ensure that tasks are completed efficiently and accurately.

[0087] Through the implementation of the above methods, the problems of difficult traceability and weak monitoring in the traditional locomotive maintenance model have been effectively solved. The creation and management of digital inspection tasks not only improves the transparency and controllability of the entire maintenance process, but also monitors progress and quality in real time, provides data-driven decision support, and thus greatly improves work efficiency and quality.

[0088] In the second aspect, based on the same inventive concept, refer to Figure 2 , shows a locomotive quality inspection process control system 200 provided by an embodiment of the present application, the system comprising:

[0089] The task issuing module 201 is used to create an inspection task according to the maintenance plan and issue the inspection task to the target quality inspector. The inspection task includes multiple nodes to be inspected and their corresponding inspection contents.

[0090] Receiving module 202, used to receive the inspection data fed back by the target quality inspector according to the inspection task;

[0091] Evaluation module 203, used to perform multi-dimensional evaluation on the inspection data according to preset evaluation criteria, and determine the completion status of the inspection task according to the multi-dimensional evaluation results;

[0092] The label issuing module 204 is used to generate an electronic label when the completion status of the inspection task is successfully completed;

[0093] The determination module 205 is used to determine the execution progress of the maintenance plan according to the electronic tag.

[0094] In an embodiment of the second aspect of the present application, the task issuing module includes:

[0095] A submodule for determining the points to be repaired is used to determine multiple points to be repaired according to the repair plan;

[0096] Determine the first inspection task based on the matching result between the inspection point and the inspection route;

[0097] The second inspection task is determined based on the matching results between the inspection content and the maintenance standards.

[0098] In an embodiment of the second aspect of the present application, the evaluation module includes:

[0099] Determine the first evaluation result of the inspection data according to the accuracy matching result between the inspection data and the standard data;

[0100] Determine the second evaluation result of the inspection data according to the matching result between the upload time of the inspection data and the standard upload time;

[0101] The completion status of the inspection task is determined based on the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the corresponding weights.

[0102] In an embodiment of the second aspect of the present application, the system further includes:

[0103] The dynamic correction module is used to dynamically adjust the inspection tasks according to the execution progress of the maintenance plan.

[0104] The above embodiments can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware (such as circuits), firmware or any other combination. When implemented using software, the above embodiments can be implemented in whole or in part in the form of a computer program product. The computer program product includes one or more computer instructions or computer programs. When a computer instruction or computer program is loaded or executed on a computer, a process or function according to an embodiment of the present application is generated in whole or in part. The computer can be a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a computer network, or other programmable system. The computer program or instruction can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, or transmitted from one computer-readable storage medium to another computer-readable storage medium. For example, the computer program or instruction can be transmitted from one website site, computer, server or data center to another website site, computer, server or data center by wired (such as infrared, wireless, microwave, etc.). The computer-readable storage medium can be any available medium that a computer can access or a data storage device such as a server or data center that contains one or more available media sets. The available medium can be a magnetic medium (for example, a floppy disk, a hard disk, a tape), an optical medium (for example, a DVD), or a semiconductor medium. The semiconductor medium can be a solid-state hard disk.

[0105] It should be understood that the term "and / or" in this article is only a description of the association relationship of associated objects, indicating that there can be three relationships. For example, A and / or B can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. A and B can be singular or plural. In addition, the character " / " in this article generally indicates that the associated objects before and after are in an "or" relationship, but it may also indicate an "and / or" relationship. Please refer to the context for specific understanding.

[0106] In this application, "at least one" means one or more, and "more" means two or more. "At least one of the following" or similar expressions refers to any combination of these items, including any combination of single or plural items. For example, at least one of a, b, or c can be represented by: a, b, c, ab, ac, bc, or abc, where a, b, c can be single or multiple.

[0107] It should be understood that in the various embodiments of the present application, the size of the serial numbers of the above-mentioned processes does not mean the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present application.

[0108] Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the units and algorithm steps of each example described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Professional and technical personnel can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered to be beyond the scope of this application.

[0109] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the above-described systems, systems and units can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0110] In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, systems and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the system embodiments described above are only schematic. For example, the division of units is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation. For example, multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some interfaces, and the indirect coupling or communication connection of the system or unit can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0111] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0112] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit.

[0113] If the function is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present application, or the part that contributes to the prior art or the part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the various embodiments of the present application. The aforementioned storage medium includes: U disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), disk or optical disk, and other media that can store program codes.

[0114] The above is only a specific implementation of the present application, but the protection scope of the present application is not limited thereto. Any person skilled in the art who is familiar with the present technical field can easily think of changes or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed in the present application, which should be included in the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application should be based on the protection scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A locomotive quality inspection process control method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Create an inspection task according to the maintenance plan, and send the inspection task to the target quality inspector, wherein the inspection task includes multiple nodes to be inspected and their corresponding inspection contents; Receiving inspection data fed back by the target quality inspector according to the inspection task; Performing a multi-dimensional evaluation on the inspection data according to preset evaluation criteria, and determining the completion status of the inspection task according to the multi-dimensional evaluation results; When the completion status of the inspection task is successful, an electronic tag is generated; The execution progress of the maintenance plan is determined according to the electronic tag.

2. The locomotive quality inspection process control method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The inspection task is created according to the maintenance plan, and the inspection task includes a first inspection task and a second inspection task, including: Determine a plurality of points to be repaired according to the repair plan; Determining the first inspection task according to the matching result between the inspection point and the inspection route; The second inspection task is determined according to the matching result between the inspection content and the maintenance standard.

3. The locomotive quality inspection process control method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Performing a multi-dimensional evaluation on the inspection data according to preset evaluation criteria, and determining the completion status of the inspection task according to the multi-dimensional evaluation results; Determining a first evaluation result of the inspection data according to a matching result of the accuracy of the inspection data and the standard data; Determining a second evaluation result of the inspection data according to a matching result between the upload time of the inspection data and the standard upload time; The completion status of the inspection task is determined according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the corresponding weights.

4. The locomotive quality inspection process control method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The method further comprises: The inspection task is dynamically adjusted according to the execution progress of the maintenance plan.

5. A locomotive quality inspection process control system, characterized in that: The system comprises: A task issuing module is used to create an inspection task according to the maintenance plan and issue the inspection task to the target quality inspector. The inspection task includes multiple nodes to be inspected and their corresponding inspection contents. A receiving module, used to receive the inspection data fed back by the target quality inspector according to the inspection task; An evaluation module, used to perform a multi-dimensional evaluation on the inspection data according to a preset evaluation standard, and determine the completion status of the inspection task according to the multi-dimensional evaluation result; The label issuing module is used to generate an electronic label when the completion status of the inspection task is successfully completed; A determination module is used to determine the execution progress of the maintenance plan according to the electronic tag.

6. The locomotive quality inspection process control system according to claim 5, characterized in that: The task issuing module includes: A submodule for determining points to be repaired, used for determining a plurality of points to be repaired according to the repair plan; Determining the first inspection task according to the matching result between the inspection point and the inspection route; The second inspection task is determined according to the matching result between the inspection content and the maintenance standard.

7. The locomotive quality inspection process control system according to claim 5, characterized in that: The evaluation module includes: Determining a first evaluation result of the inspection data according to a matching result of the accuracy of the inspection data and the standard data; Determining a second evaluation result of the inspection data according to a matching result between the upload time of the inspection data and the standard upload time; The completion status of the inspection task is determined according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the corresponding weights.

8. The locomotive quality inspection process control system according to claim 5, characterized in that: The system further comprises: The dynamic correction module is used to dynamically adjust the inspection task according to the execution progress of the maintenance plan.

9. A terminal device, characterized in that: The terminal device comprises: a memory and one or more processors; the memory is coupled to the processor; The memory is used to store computer program code, and the computer program code includes computer instructions; when the computer instructions are executed by the processor, the terminal device executes the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 4.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: including computer instructions; When the computer instructions are executed on a terminal device, the terminal device is caused to execute the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

Images