Damage standard determination method and device, damage evaluation method and device, equipment and medium
By testing the total sample damage amount and determining the damage level range for the vehicle transmission components, the subjectivity problem of traditional vehicle damage assessment methods is solved, and a more objective and accurate damage assessment is achieved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202510020877.5
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-01-07
- Publication Date
- 2025-04-29
AI Technical Summary
Traditional vehicle damage assessment methods are based on appearance assessment and are easily affected by subjective judgments of the assessors, resulting in insufficient objectivity and accuracy.
By determining the total sample damage of sample transmission parts of different sample vehicles during the test operation period, the damage level range is determined based on the total sample damage, and the evaluation standard range is determined based on the total damage range within the interval, objective and accurate evaluation of the damage of transmission parts is achieved.
It improves the objectivity and accuracy of the damage assessment of transmission parts, reduces the impact of the subjective judgment of the assessor, and provides a reliable evaluation standard.
Smart Images
Figure CN119901482A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present application relates to the field of vehicle damage technology, and in particular to a damage standard determination and damage assessment method, device, equipment and medium. Background Art
[0002] With the development of economy, vehicles are an indispensable means of transportation in people's lives. When a vehicle needs to be compensated or traded, it needs to be evaluated or appraised. The transmission parts of a vehicle are the key parts of the vehicle, and the health status of the transmission parts is also an important dimension for evaluating or appraising the vehicle.
[0003] In traditional methods, vehicles or vehicle parts are usually evaluated based on the appearance of each vehicle component, vehicle mileage, and vehicle age. However, this appearance-based evaluation method is often inevitably affected by the evaluator's personal subjective judgment, which to a certain extent reduces the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation results. How to objectively and accurately conduct damage assessment has become an urgent problem to be solved. Summary of the invention
[0004] Based on this, it is necessary to provide a damage standard determination and damage assessment method, device, equipment and medium that can improve the objectivity and accuracy of transmission component damage assessment in response to the above-mentioned technical problems.
[0005] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for determining a damage standard of a vehicle transmission component, comprising:
[0006] Determine the total amount of sample damage to sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during the test operation period; wherein the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category;
[0007] Based on the total amount of damage of each sample, determining at least one damage level interval corresponding to the transmission component of the sample; each damage level interval corresponds to a damage level;
[0008] For each damage level interval, the standard range of the target object to be evaluated at the corresponding damage level is determined based on the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval; wherein the target object includes the target transmission components of the target vehicle; the target vehicle and the sample vehicle belong to the same vehicle category; the target transmission components and the sample transmission components belong to the same component category.
[0009] In one of the embodiments, based on the total amount of damage of each sample, at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component is determined, including determining the distribution data of the total amount of damage of each sample under the target mathematical distribution; dividing the distribution data into intervals to obtain at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component.
[0010] In one of the embodiments, the target mathematical distribution is determined by the following steps: determining at least one preset mathematical distribution; for each preset mathematical distribution, determining the P value and KS statistic of the total amount of sample damage corresponding to each sample vehicle under the preset mathematical distribution; from the preset mathematical distributions corresponding to the P values less than the preset values, selecting the preset mathematical distribution with the smallest corresponding KS statistic as the target mathematical distribution.
[0011] In one of the embodiments, the distribution data is divided into intervals to obtain at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component, including: obtaining the total amount of sample damage located at at least one preset quantile position from the distribution data; and determining at least one damage level interval based on the total amount of sample damage at each preset quantile position.
[0012] In one of the embodiments, the total amount of sample damage of sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during a test operation period is determined, including: for each sample transmission component, obtaining test data of the sample transmission component at each test time point during the test operation period; for each test time point, determining the damage value of the sample transmission component at the corresponding test time point based on the test data corresponding to the test time point; and determining the total amount of sample damage of the corresponding sample transmission component during the test operation period based on the damage values corresponding to all test time points during the test operation period.
[0013] In a second aspect, the present application also provides a damage assessment method for a vehicle transmission component, comprising:
[0014] Determine the target total amount of damage to the transmission components to be evaluated in the target vehicle during the evaluation operation period;
[0015] Get the vehicle category of the target vehicle;
[0016] Obtaining the standard range of each damage level interval of the transmission component to be evaluated under the vehicle category; wherein the standard range is determined based on the damage standard determination method for the vehicle transmission component provided in the first aspect above;
[0017] Based on the standard range of each damage level interval, determine the target damage level interval to which the target damage amount belongs;
[0018] The transmission component to be evaluated is evaluated to a damage level corresponding to the target damage level range.
[0019] In a third aspect, the present application further provides a device for determining a damage standard of a vehicle transmission component, comprising:
[0020] The first determination module is used to determine the total amount of sample damage of sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during the test operation period; wherein the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category;
[0021] A second determination module is used to determine at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component based on the total damage amount of each sample; each damage level interval corresponds to a damage level;
[0022] The third determination module is used to determine, for each damage level interval, the standard range of the evaluation target object at the corresponding damage level according to the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval; wherein the target object includes the target transmission component of the target vehicle; the target vehicle and the sample vehicle belong to the same vehicle category; the target transmission component and the sample transmission component belong to the same component category.
[0023] In a fourth aspect, the present application further provides a damage assessment device for a vehicle transmission component, comprising:
[0024] A fourth determination module is used to determine a target total amount of damage to the transmission component to be evaluated in the target vehicle during an evaluation operation period;
[0025] A first acquisition module, used to acquire the vehicle category of the target vehicle;
[0026] A second acquisition module is used to obtain a standard range of each damage level interval of the transmission component to be evaluated under the vehicle category; wherein the standard range is determined based on the damage standard determination method for the vehicle transmission component provided in the first aspect above;
[0027] A fifth determination module, configured to determine a target damage level interval to which the target damage amount belongs based on a standard range of each damage level interval;
[0028] The evaluation module is used to evaluate the transmission component to be evaluated as a damage level corresponding to a target damage level interval.
[0029] In a fifth aspect, the present application further provides a computer device, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the method of the first aspect or the second aspect in various possible implementations is implemented.
[0030] In a sixth aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of the first aspect or the second aspect in various possible implementation modes.
[0031] In a seventh aspect, the present application further provides a computer program product, including a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of the first aspect or the second aspect in various possible implementation modes.
[0032] The above damage standard determination and damage assessment methods, devices, equipment, media and program products provide an original reference for the determination of damage standards by determining the total amount of sample damage of sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during the test operation period. At the same time, since the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category, the total amount of sample damage corresponding to each sample transmission component is guaranteed to be highly comparable and referenceable. Based on the total amount of damage of each sample, at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component is determined, so that for each damage level interval, according to the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval, the standard range of the assessment target object at the corresponding damage level is determined. It provides an objective and accurate standard for the damage assessment of transmission components, and the assessment process does not require the introduction of subjective judgment of the assessor. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0033] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application or related technologies, the drawings required for use in the embodiments of the present application or related technical descriptions will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other related drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.
[0034] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a process for determining a damage standard of a vehicle transmission component in one embodiment;
[0035] Figure 2 is a flow chart of a step of determining a damage level interval in one embodiment;
[0036] Figure 3 A schematic flow chart of a damage assessment method for a vehicle transmission component in one embodiment;
[0037] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of a process for determining a damage standard of a vehicle transmission component in another embodiment;
[0038] Figure 5 It is a structural block diagram of a device for determining a damage standard of a vehicle transmission component in one embodiment;
[0039] Figure 6 is a structural block diagram of a damage assessment device for a vehicle transmission component in one embodiment;
[0040] Figure 7 FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the internal structure of a computer device in one embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0041] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the present application more clearly understood, the present application is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not used to limit the present application.
[0042] In one embodiment, Figure 1 As shown, a method for determining the damage standard of a vehicle transmission component is provided. This embodiment takes the method applied to a terminal as an example. It can be understood that the method can also be applied to a server, and can also be applied to a system including a terminal and a server, and is implemented through the interaction between the terminal and the server. In this embodiment, the method includes the following steps:
[0043] S110. Determine the total amount of sample damage to sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during a test operation period; wherein the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category.
[0044] Among them, the vehicle category can be understood as a classification system that divides vehicles into different types according to the static configuration attributes of the vehicle. The static configuration attributes may include at least one of the origin, brand, vehicle platform, vehicle line, emission type, fuel type, drive form, engine model, transmission component model and rear axle speed ratio. The transmission component model may include at least one of the gearbox model and drive axle model. It should be noted that technicians can select the corresponding static configuration attributes according to actual needs, and this application does not impose any restrictions on the type and quantity of the selected static configuration attributes. The sample transmission component may include at least one of a gearbox, a drive axle, etc.
[0045] Among them, the test operation period can be understood as a damage test on the sample transmission component within a set time length. The total sample damage amount represents the total amount of damage accumulated after the sample transmission component has undergone a damage test for a set time length. Among them, the damage test can be a fatigue test, which refers to applying repeated or periodic loads to the sample transmission component within a set time length to determine the gradually accumulated damage value of the sample transmission component. The set time length can be set by technical personnel according to needs or experience, or determined through a large number of experiments, and this application does not impose any restrictions on this.
[0046] In an optional embodiment, the total amount of sample damage to sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during a test operation period is determined, including: for each sample transmission component, obtaining test data of the sample transmission component at each test time point during the test operation period; for each test time point, determining the damage value of the sample transmission component at the corresponding test time point based on the test data corresponding to the test time point; and determining the total amount of sample damage to the corresponding sample transmission component during the test operation period based on the damage values corresponding to all test time points during the test operation period.
[0047] Wherein, the test data includes the input speed, input torque and SN (Stress-Number of Cycles Curve) curve coefficient of the sample transmission component at the corresponding test time point. The SN curve is used to describe the fatigue performance of the material under cyclic stress or cyclic strain. The SN curve coefficient is used to represent the relevant parameters between stress and life. Exemplarily, the sample transmission component can be a gearbox, and the test data includes the gearbox input speed, gearbox input torque and the corresponding SN curve coefficient at the corresponding test time point. Exemplarily, the sample transmission component can be a drive axle, and the test data includes the drive axle input speed, drive axle input torque and the corresponding SN curve coefficient at the corresponding test time point.
[0048] Among them, the damage value of the sample transmission component at the corresponding test time point can be determined based on the test data corresponding to the test time point and the Miner damage theorem. The damage values of the sample transmission components at all test time points are summed to obtain the total sample damage during the test operation period.
[0049] In an optional embodiment, the damage value of the sample transmission component at the corresponding test time point can be calculated by the following formula:
[0050] ;
[0051] Wherein, S represents the damage value of the sample transmission component at the corresponding test time point; T represents the input torque of the sample transmission component; N represents the input speed of the sample transmission component, that is, the number of rotations of the sample transmission component input in one second; Indicates the SN curve coefficient.
[0052] S120. Based on the total amount of damage of each sample, determine at least one damage level interval corresponding to the transmission component of the sample; each damage level interval corresponds to a damage level.
[0053] The number of damage level intervals can be set by technicians according to needs or experience, or determined through a large number of experiments, and this application does not impose any limitation on this. For example, four damage level intervals can be set, that is, four damage levels can be set.
[0054] In an optional embodiment, at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component may be determined based on the distribution of the total amount of damage of each sample.
[0055] S130. For each damage level interval, determine the standard range of the target object to be evaluated at the corresponding damage level based on the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval; wherein the target object includes the target transmission component of the target vehicle; the target vehicle and the sample vehicle belong to the same vehicle category; and the target transmission component and the sample transmission component belong to the same component category.
[0056] In an optional embodiment, the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval may be used as a standard range for evaluating the target object at the corresponding damage level.
[0057] In the embodiment of the present application, by determining the total amount of sample damage of sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during the test operation period, an original reference is provided for determining the damage standard. At the same time, since the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category, the total amount of sample damage corresponding to each sample transmission component is ensured to have high comparability and reference. By determining at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component based on the total amount of damage of each sample, the standard range of the evaluation target object at the corresponding damage level is determined for each damage level interval according to the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval. It provides an objective and accurate standard for the damage assessment of transmission components, and the evaluation process does not need to introduce subjective judgment of the evaluator.
[0058] Based on the technical solutions of the above embodiments, the present application also provides an optional embodiment, in which the steps for determining the damage level interval are refined.
[0059] See also Figure 2 The steps for determining the damage level range shown include:
[0060] S210, determining the distribution data of the total damage amount of each sample under the target mathematical distribution.
[0061] Among them, the target mathematical distribution is the probability distribution, which is a mathematical function used to describe the regularity of the values of random variables.
[0062] In an optional embodiment, the target mathematical distribution is determined by the following steps: determining at least one preset mathematical distribution; for each preset mathematical distribution, determining the P value and KS statistic of the total sample damage corresponding to each sample vehicle under the preset mathematical distribution; from the preset mathematical distributions corresponding to the P values less than the preset values, selecting the preset mathematical distribution with the smallest corresponding KS statistic as the target mathematical distribution.
[0063] Among them, the P value and KS statistic can be understood as statistical parameters used to evaluate the statistical relationship or difference between sample data and overall data, or between different sample data. The P value is used to characterize the probability of obtaining a result equal to or more extreme than the current observation through random sampling under the condition that the null hypothesis is true. If the P value is less than the preset value, the corresponding preset mathematical distribution can be considered to be significant. It should be noted that the preset value can be set by technicians according to needs or experience, or determined through a large number of experiments, and this application does not impose any restrictions on this. In particular, the preset value can be set to 0.05. The smaller the KS (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) statistic, the more it matches the preset mathematical distribution with the sample data.
[0064] The preset mathematical distribution may include at least one of normal distribution, Poisson distribution, Weibull distribution, lognormal distribution, exponential distribution, uniform distribution, gamma distribution and chi-square distribution.
[0065] S220, dividing the distribution data into intervals to obtain at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component.
[0066] In an optional embodiment, the distribution data is divided into intervals to obtain at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component, including: obtaining the total amount of sample damage located at at least one preset quantile position from the distribution data; and determining at least one damage level interval based on the total amount of sample damage at each preset quantile position.
[0067] Optionally, the total sample damage amount at each preset quantile position, the minimum sample damage amount and the maximum sample damage amount in the distribution data can be used as the boundaries of the level interval, thereby dividing the corresponding number of damage level intervals.
[0068] Among them, the number and specific values of the preset quantiles can be set by the technicians according to needs or experience, or determined through a large number of experiments, and this application does not impose any restrictions on this. In particular, there are three preset quantiles, namely the 25th quantile, the 50th quantile and the 70th quantile. The total amount of sample damage corresponding to the minimum sample damage amount to the 25th quantile is taken as the first damage level interval, and the damage level is level one; the total amount of sample damage corresponding to the 25th quantile to the total amount of sample damage corresponding to the 50th quantile is taken as the second damage level interval, and the damage level is level two; the total amount of sample damage corresponding to the 50th quantile to the total amount of sample damage corresponding to the 70th quantile is taken as the third damage level interval, and the damage level is level three; the total amount of sample damage corresponding to the 70th quantile to the maximum sample damage is taken as the fourth damage level interval, and the damage level is level four. Among them, the larger the damage level, the higher the degree of damage to the transmission component, and the worse the evaluation.
[0069] In the embodiment of the present application, by determining the distribution data of the total damage amount of each sample under the target mathematical distribution and dividing the distribution data into intervals, the damage level intervals obtained based on this can more objectively and accurately reflect the damage level of the transmission component.
[0070] The above process mainly involves a method for determining the damage standard of a vehicle transmission component. In one embodiment, Figure 3 As shown, a damage assessment method for a vehicle transmission component is provided, the method comprising:
[0071] S310: Determine the target total amount of damage to the transmission component to be evaluated in the target vehicle during the evaluation operation period.
[0072] S320: Obtain the vehicle category of the target vehicle.
[0073] S330: Obtain the standard range of each damage level interval of the transmission component to be evaluated under the vehicle category.
[0074] S340. Determine the target damage level interval to which the target total damage amount belongs based on the standard range of each damage level interval.
[0075] S350: Evaluate the transmission component to be evaluated to a damage level corresponding to the target damage level range.
[0076] The standard range is determined based on the above-mentioned method for determining the damage standard of vehicle transmission components. The target vehicle can be understood as a vehicle that needs to be assessed for damage. In particular, the target vehicle can be a used vehicle.
[0077] It can be understood that based on the above-mentioned method for determining the damage standard of vehicle transmission components, the standard ranges of each damage level interval of different target transmission components under different vehicle categories can be determined. Therefore, when evaluating the transmission components to be evaluated in the target vehicle, it is only necessary to find the standard ranges of each damage level interval that matches the vehicle category of the target vehicle and the type of transmission components to be evaluated, so as to determine the target damage level interval to which the target total amount of damage belongs and the corresponding damage level.
[0078] In an optional embodiment, the length of the evaluation operation period and the time length of the test operation period may be different. In this case, the standard range of the target damage level interval may be corrected according to the ratio of the time length of the evaluation operation period to the time length of the test operation period. In another optional embodiment, the length of the evaluation operation period and the time length of the test operation period may be the same, so as to directly determine the target damage level interval to which the target damage amount belongs.
[0079] In an optional embodiment, the damage standard determination method further includes: obtaining the damage level of each transmission component to be evaluated in the target vehicle; and evaluating the vehicle condition of the target vehicle according to the damage level of each transmission component to be evaluated.
[0080] The type and quantity of each transmission component to be evaluated can be set based on actual needs, and this application does not impose any restrictions on the type and quantity of each transmission component to be evaluated. In particular, each transmission component to be evaluated includes a gearbox and a drive axle.
[0081] Among them, the damage level of each transmission component to be evaluated can reflect the condition of the target vehicle to a certain extent, and provide a reliable basis for evaluating the condition of the target vehicle.
[0082] In an embodiment of the present application, by obtaining the standard range of each damage level interval of the transmission component to be evaluated under the vehicle category of the target vehicle, and based on the standard range of each damage level interval, the target damage level interval to which the target total amount of damage belongs is determined, thereby being able to objectively and accurately determine the damage level of the transmission component to be evaluated without introducing the subjective judgment of the evaluator.
[0083] Based on the technical solutions of the above-mentioned embodiments, the present application also provides an optional embodiment, in which another specific implementation method of the method for determining the damage standard of vehicle transmission components is provided.
[0084] See also Figure 4 Another method for determining the damage standard of a vehicle transmission component shown includes:
[0085] S410. Determine the total amount of sample damage to sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during a test operation period; wherein the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category.
[0086] S420. Determine at least one preset mathematical distribution.
[0087] S430. For each preset mathematical distribution, determine the P value and KS statistic of the total amount of sample damage corresponding to each sample vehicle under the preset mathematical distribution.
[0088] S440. From the preset mathematical distributions corresponding to P values less than the preset value, select the preset mathematical distribution with the smallest corresponding KS statistic as the target mathematical distribution.
[0089] S450, determining the distribution data of the total damage amount of each sample under the target mathematical distribution.
[0090] S460. Obtain the total amount of sample damage located at at least one preset quantile position from the distribution data.
[0091] S470. Determine at least one damage level interval based on the total amount of sample damage at each preset quantile position; each damage level interval corresponds to a damage level.
[0092] S480. For each damage level interval, determine the standard range of the target object to be evaluated at the corresponding damage level based on the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval; wherein the target object includes the target transmission component of the target vehicle; the target vehicle and the sample vehicle belong to the same vehicle category; and the target transmission component and the sample transmission component belong to the same component category.
[0093] It should be understood that, although the various steps in the flowcharts involved in the above-mentioned embodiments are displayed in sequence according to the indication of the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in sequence according to the order indicated by the arrows. Unless there is a clear explanation in this article, the execution of these steps does not have a strict order restriction, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a part of the steps in the flowcharts involved in the above-mentioned embodiments can include multiple steps or multiple stages, and these steps or stages are not necessarily executed at the same time, but can be executed at different times, and the execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily to be carried out in sequence, but can be executed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least a part of the steps or stages in other steps.
[0094] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present application also provides a device for determining the damage standard of a vehicle transmission component for implementing the above-mentioned method for determining the damage standard of a vehicle transmission component. The implementation scheme for solving the problem provided by the device is similar to the implementation scheme recorded in the above-mentioned method, so the specific limitations in the embodiments of the device for determining the damage standard of one or more vehicle transmission components provided below can refer to the limitations of the method for determining the damage standard of a vehicle transmission component above, and will not be repeated here.
[0095] In an exemplary embodiment, Figure 5 As shown, a device for determining a damage standard of a vehicle transmission component is provided, comprising: a first determination module 510, a second determination module 520 and a third determination module 530, wherein:
[0096] The first determination module 510 is used to determine the total amount of sample damage to sample transmission components of different sample vehicles within a test operation period; wherein the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category.
[0097] The second determination module 520 is used to determine at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component based on the total damage amount of each sample; each damage level interval corresponds to a damage level.
[0098] The third determination module 530 is used to determine, for each damage level interval, the standard range of the evaluation target object at the corresponding damage level according to the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval; wherein the target object includes the target transmission component of the target vehicle; the target vehicle and the sample vehicle belong to the same vehicle category; the target transmission component and the sample transmission component belong to the same component category.
[0099] In one embodiment, the second determination module 520 includes: a first determination unit, used to determine the distribution data of the total damage amount of each sample under the target mathematical distribution; a division unit, used to divide the distribution data into intervals to obtain at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component.
[0100] In one embodiment, it also includes: a sixth determination module, used to determine at least one preset mathematical distribution; a seventh determination module, used to determine, for each preset mathematical distribution, the P value and KS statistic of the total sample damage corresponding to each sample vehicle under the preset mathematical distribution; a selection module, used to select the preset mathematical distribution with the smallest corresponding KS statistic from the preset mathematical distributions corresponding to P values less than the preset value, as the target mathematical distribution.
[0101] In one embodiment, the division unit includes: a first acquisition subunit, configured to acquire the total amount of sample damage at at least one preset quantile position from the distribution data; and a first determination subunit, configured to determine at least one damage level interval based on the total amount of sample damage at each preset quantile position.
[0102] In one embodiment, the first determination module 510 includes: a first acquisition unit, used to obtain, for each sample transmission component, the test data of the sample transmission component at each test time point within the test operation period; a second determination unit, used to determine, for each test time point, the damage value of the sample transmission component at the corresponding test time point according to the test data corresponding to the test time point; and a third determination unit, used to determine the total amount of sample damage of the corresponding sample transmission component within the test operation period according to the damage values corresponding to all test time points within the test operation period.
[0103] In an exemplary embodiment, Figure 6 As shown, a damage assessment device for a vehicle transmission component is provided, comprising: a fourth determination module 610, a first acquisition module 620, a second acquisition module 630, a fifth determination module 640 and an assessment module 650, wherein:
[0104] The fourth determination module 610 is used to determine a target total amount of damage to the transmission component to be evaluated in the target vehicle during the evaluation operation period.
[0105] The first acquisition module 620 is used to acquire the vehicle category of the target vehicle.
[0106] The second acquisition module 630 is used to obtain the standard range of each damage level interval of the transmission component to be evaluated under the vehicle category; wherein the standard range is determined based on the above-mentioned method for determining the damage standard of the vehicle transmission component.
[0107] The fifth determination module 640 is used to determine the target damage level interval to which the target damage amount belongs based on the standard range of each damage level interval.
[0108] The evaluation module 650 is used to evaluate the damage level of the transmission component to be evaluated as corresponding to the target damage level range.
[0109] Each module in the above-mentioned vehicle transmission component damage standard determination device and vehicle transmission component damage assessment device can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware and their combination. Each of the above-mentioned modules can be embedded in or independent of the processor in the computer device in the form of hardware, or can be stored in the memory of the computer device in the form of software, so that the processor can call and execute the corresponding operations of each of the above modules.
[0110] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided. The computer device may be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in FIG. Figure 7 As shown. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, an input / output interface, a communication interface, a display unit and an input device. The processor, the memory and the input / output interface are connected through a system bus, and the communication interface, the display unit and the input device are connected to the system bus through the input / output interface. The processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The input / output interface of the computer device is used to exchange information between the processor and an external device. The communication interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal in a wired or wireless manner, and the wireless manner can be implemented through WIFI, a mobile cellular network, near field communication (NFC) or other technologies. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a method for determining a damage standard of a vehicle transmission component or a method for assessing damage to a vehicle transmission component is implemented. The display unit of the computer device is used to form a visually visible picture, which can be a display screen, a projection device or a virtual reality imaging device. The display screen can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer device can be a touch layer covering the display screen, or a button, trackball or touchpad set on the computer device shell, or an external keyboard, touchpad or mouse.
[0111] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 7 The structure shown in the figure is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
[0112] In one embodiment, a computer device is further provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and the processor implements the steps in the above method embodiments when executing the computer program.
[0113] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the above-mentioned method embodiments are implemented.
[0114] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, including a computer program, which implements the steps in the above method embodiments when executed by a processor.
[0115] A person of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment method can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to the memory, database or other medium used in the embodiments provided in the present application can include at least one of non-volatile memory and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM can be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The database involved in each embodiment provided in this application may include at least one of a relational database and a non-relational database. Non-relational databases may include distributed databases based on blockchains, etc., but are not limited to this. The processor involved in each embodiment provided in this application may be a general-purpose processor, a central processing unit, a graphics processor, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic device, a data processing logic device based on quantum computing, an artificial intelligence (AI) processor, etc., but are not limited to this.
[0116] The technical features of the above embodiments may be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this application.
[0117] The above-described embodiments only express several implementation methods of the present application, and the descriptions thereof are relatively specific and detailed, but they cannot be understood as limiting the scope of the present application. It should be pointed out that, for a person of ordinary skill in the art, several variations and improvements can be made without departing from the concept of the present application, and these all belong to the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the attached claims.
Claims
1. A method for determining the damage standard of a vehicle transmission component, characterized in that: The method comprises: Determine the total amount of sample damage to sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during the test operation period; wherein the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category; Based on the total amount of damage of each of the samples, determining at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component; each damage level interval corresponds to a damage level; For each damage level interval, the standard range of the target object to be evaluated at the corresponding damage level is determined based on the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval; wherein the target object includes a target transmission component of a target vehicle; the target vehicle and the sample vehicle belong to the same vehicle category; the target transmission component and the sample transmission component belong to the same component category.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The determining, based on the total amount of damage of each sample, at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component comprises: Determining distribution data of the total amount of damage of each of the samples under a target mathematical distribution; The distribution data is divided into intervals to obtain at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component.
3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The target mathematical distribution is determined by the following steps: determining at least one predetermined mathematical distribution; For each preset mathematical distribution, determine the P value and KS statistic of the total amount of sample damage corresponding to each sample vehicle under the preset mathematical distribution; From the preset mathematical distributions corresponding to P values less than the preset value, the preset mathematical distribution with the smallest corresponding KS statistic is selected as the target mathematical distribution.
4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of dividing the distribution data into intervals to obtain at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component includes: From the distribution data, obtaining the total amount of sample damage located at at least one preset quantile position; At least one damage level interval is determined based on the total amount of sample damage at each preset quantile position.
5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that: The determining of the total amount of sample damage of sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during the test operation period includes: For each sample transmission component, obtaining test data of the sample transmission component at each test time point during a test operation period; For each test time point, determining the damage value of the sample transmission component at the corresponding test time point according to the test data corresponding to the test time point; According to the damage values corresponding to all the test time points in the test operation period, the total amount of sample damage of the corresponding sample transmission component in the test operation period is determined.
6. A damage assessment method for vehicle transmission components, characterized in that: The method comprises: Determine the target total amount of damage to the transmission components to be evaluated in the target vehicle during the evaluation operation period; Get the vehicle category of the target vehicle; Obtaining the standard range of each damage level interval of the transmission component to be evaluated under the vehicle category; wherein the standard range is determined based on the method described in any one of claims 1 to 5; Determining a target damage level interval to which the target damage amount belongs based on the standard range of each damage level interval; The transmission component to be evaluated is evaluated as having a damage level corresponding to the target damage level interval.
7. A device for determining damage standards of vehicle transmission components, characterized in that: The device comprises: The first determination module is used to determine the total amount of sample damage of sample transmission components of different sample vehicles during the test operation period; wherein the different sample vehicles belong to the same vehicle category; A second determination module is used to determine at least one damage level interval corresponding to the sample transmission component based on the total damage amount of each sample; each damage level interval corresponds to a damage level; The third determination module is used to determine, for each damage level interval, the standard range of the evaluation target object at the corresponding damage level according to the numerical range of the total amount of sample damage within the damage level interval; wherein the target object includes a target transmission component of a target vehicle; the target vehicle belongs to the same vehicle category as the sample vehicle; and the target transmission component belongs to the same component category as the sample transmission component.
8. A damage assessment device for a vehicle transmission component, characterized in that: The device comprises: A fourth determination module is used to determine a target total amount of damage to the transmission component to be evaluated in the target vehicle during an evaluation operation period; A first acquisition module, used to acquire the vehicle category of the target vehicle; A second acquisition module is used to obtain a standard range of each damage level interval of the transmission component to be evaluated under the vehicle category; wherein the standard range is determined based on the method described in any one of claims 1 to 5; A fifth determination module, configured to determine the target damage level interval to which the target damage amount belongs based on the standard range of each damage level interval; An evaluation module is used to evaluate the transmission component to be evaluated as a damage level corresponding to the target damage level interval.
9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.
10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.