Performance assessment system and method for medical affairs

Abstract

The invention provides a performance assessment system and method for a medical copyright, and the system comprises a performance assessment management module which is configured to carry out the assessment and scoring of each member unit in the medical copyright according to a preset assessment rule, and generates an assessment result; the assessment rules comprise an interval standard method, a standard floating method and a proportion calculation method, and are used for providing corresponding score calculation rules for different assessment scenes; the performance accounting management module is configured to calculate the total amount of performance which should be issued by each member unit according to preset accounting rules and standards on the basis of the assessment result; and the performance allocation management module is configured for each department in each member unit to perform staff performance secondary allocation and report based on the total amount of the performance to be issued. Through fine management and modular design, and by introducing the assessment index calculation rules suitable for different assessment scenes, comprehensiveness, flexibility and high efficiency of medical coexistence performance assessment are realized, and reasonable configuration of medical resources and improvement of the service level are promoted.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of performance appraisal technology, and in particular to a medical community performance appraisal system and method. Background Art

[0002] Medical community is a close-knit medical service system formed in a certain area, led by a county-level hospital, in conjunction with township health centers, community health service centers and other grassroots medical and health institutions, by integrating medical resources, optimizing service processes, and strengthening division of labor and cooperation. By establishing a unified management system, operating mechanism and service model, it provides continuous, coordinated and efficient medical and health services to residents in the area.

[0003] Although the construction of medical communities has achieved many successful experiences, there are still many problems in the performance management of medical communities:

[0004] (1) A unified performance management mechanism has not been established within the medical community

[0005] The close-knit medical community covers county-level hospitals, township health centers, community health service centers, village clinics and other multi-level medical and health institutions, as well as special medical institutions such as disease prevention and control institutions. After the establishment of the medical community, the unified management of medical institutions at all levels is more reflected in the medical business. Performance management is often managed by each member unit within the hospital. There is a lack of unified performance management of each member unit at the medical community level, including management mechanisms, department settings, staffing, assessment standards, rewards and punishments, etc.

[0006] (2) Improper setting of assessment indicators

[0007] Due to the different functional positioning and duties of different medical institutions, the operating goals involve multiple dimensions such as disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment services, and chronic disease management, making the content of performance appraisal very complicated. Some medical communities pay too much attention to basic medical services and lack guidance on differentiated positioning and service level improvement among hospitals. Traditional performance appraisals also tend to focus on simple workload indicators, such as outpatient volume and inpatient volume, but not enough attention to key indicators such as medical quality, patient satisfaction, and public health services, which can easily lead to the problem of "focusing on quantity and neglecting quality". On the other hand, there is a lack of standardized evaluation rules, and the same assessment methods are used for indicators of different natures, making it difficult to comprehensively assess and guide service improvements, and unable to meet performance management needs.

[0008] (3) Poor quality of performance appraisal data

[0009] The informationization levels of different medical institutions vary. The informationization construction of some grassroots medical institutions lags behind. Unified data collection and evaluation standards have not yet been fully established. Most of the assessments are carried out through manual on-site assessments, which makes the accuracy of assessment data poor, and the data entry is untimely, inaccurate, time-consuming and labor-intensive.

[0010] (4) Limited application of performance appraisal results

[0011] Performance management is a process of continuous feedback and improvement. Only by linking the assessment results with the vital interests of the assessed can the assessed be motivated to improve their work. Limited by the lack of unified funds in most medical communities, there is no sufficient personnel management authority within the medical community, which makes it difficult to use the assessment results effectively.

[0012] Therefore, in the context of medical community construction, how to provide a performance management system to conduct unified and convenient performance management of internal member units has become an urgent problem to be solved. Summary of the invention

[0013] In order to solve the above problems, the present invention proposes a medical community performance appraisal system and method, from the construction of the basic architecture, clarifying the member units and personnel information, to performance appraisal management, setting up multiple scoring rules for appraisal according to different scenarios; then to performance accounting, calculating the total amount to be paid according to the rules and standards; finally, performance distribution, completing the secondary distribution of employees, realizing the full process performance management of the medical community and the medical institutions within it, timely grasping the operation status of the medical community, providing support for personnel at all levels to carry out management work and formulate relevant documents, and better building a close-knit medical community.

[0014] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention adopts the following technical solution:

[0015] In a first aspect, the present invention provides a medical community performance appraisal system, comprising:

[0016] The performance appraisal management module is configured to evaluate and score each member unit in the medical community according to preset appraisal rules and generate appraisal results; the appraisal rules include the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are used to provide corresponding scoring calculation rules for different appraisal scenarios;

[0017] The performance accounting management module is configured to calculate the total amount of performance payable to each member unit based on the assessment results and according to preset accounting rules and standards;

[0018] The performance distribution management module is configured so that each department within each member unit can perform secondary distribution of employee performance based on the total amount of performance payable and report it.

[0019] Preferably, the performance appraisal management module includes an appraisal index unit, an index weight unit, a target value unit, an appraisal index decomposition unit, a scoring rule unit and an appraisal result unit;

[0020] An assessment indicator unit, used to add or edit assessment indicators according to management requirements. The assessment indicators include primary indicators and their subdivided secondary indicators;

[0021] The indicator weight unit is used to set the weights of the primary and secondary indicators of each member unit;

[0022] The target value unit is used to set the total target value for each assessment indicator of each member unit;

[0023] An assessment indicator decomposition unit is used to decompose the overall goal into each member unit;

[0024] The scoring rule unit is used to set assessment rules for each assessment indicator of each member unit and calculate the score of each single indicator according to the assessment rules;

[0025] The assessment result unit is used to calculate the final assessment score of each member unit based on each individual indicator, and obtain the assessment result by comparing it with the total target value.

[0026] Preferably, the first-level indicators include financial dimension indicators, medical service capacity indicators, medical service quality and efficiency indicators, and basic public health service indicators;

[0027] The secondary indicators of the financial dimension indicators include medical income, outpatient income, inpatient income, drug income and health materials;

[0028] The secondary indicators of medical service capacity index include outpatient visit rate, emergency visit ratio, discharged patient cure rate and surgical ratio;

[0029] The secondary indicators of medical service quality and efficiency indicators include the growth rate of average outpatient cost per visit, the growth rate of average inpatient cost per visit and the proportion of basic drugs;

[0030] The secondary indicators of basic public health indicators include environmental sanitation of medical institutions, neonatal visit rate, number of postpartum follow-up visits and health examination rate of the elderly.

[0031] Preferably, the assessment rules include the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are used to provide corresponding scoring calculation rules for different assessment scenarios, specifically:

[0032] The interval standard method is to define different intervals according to the scores of individual indicators, and each interval corresponds to an assessment score, which is suitable for assessment scenarios that focus on overall evaluation;

[0033] The standard floating method is to calculate the difference between the score of a single indicator and the value of a single indicator, and then multiply it by the score change corresponding to each unit change. It is suitable for assessment scenarios with clear quantitative indicator requirements for medical institutions.

[0034] The proportional calculation method is to calculate the assessment score based on the ratio of the single indicator score to the single target value, and is suitable for assessment scenarios that focus on the progress of the overall goal completion.

[0035] Preferably, the performance accounting management module includes a funding source unit, an accounting rule unit, an accounting standard unit, an accounting report unit and an accounting approval unit;

[0036] The funding source unit is used to input the performance funding sources of each member unit, including fiscal funds, medical funds, public health funds and other funds;

[0037] The accounting rule unit is used to configure the calculation logic of various funding sources, expenditure items, and special performance;

[0038] The accounting standard unit is used to input the provision ratio of various funds, the deduction ratio of cost expenditure and the balance extraction ratio;

[0039] The accounting report unit is used to calculate the total performance amount to be issued to each member unit in the current period and the specific composition detailed data according to the source of funds, accounting rules and accounting standards;

[0040] The accounting approval unit is used by the general hospital to approve or reject the financial data submitted by each member unit and the total performance data after calculation.

[0041] Preferably, the performance allocation management module includes a performance reporting unit, a performance approval unit and a performance summary unit;

[0042] The performance reporting unit is used for managers of each department in the member unit to report the performance amount of each employee, save the data and submit it;

[0043] The performance approval unit is used by performance management personnel of each member unit to approve or reject the secondary performance distribution results submitted by each department;

[0044] The performance summary unit is used to summarize the performance results of all employees of each member unit to generate a performance list for performance distribution.

[0045] Preferably, it also includes an infrastructure management module, including a medical community management unit, an accounting agency management unit and an employee information management unit;

[0046] The medical community management unit is used to add, update or delete member units of the medical community;

[0047] The accounting organization management unit is used to import the names, types and hierarchical relationships of member units; the types include county-level hospitals, township health centers, village clinics and medical community functional management departments;

[0048] The employee information management unit is used to import the personnel roster of each member unit, and the roster includes user number, name, affiliated medical institution, affiliated department, bank card number and performance coefficient information.

[0049] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a medical community performance assessment method, comprising:

[0050] According to the preset assessment rules, each member unit in the medical community is assessed and scored and the assessment results are generated; the assessment rules include the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are used to provide corresponding scoring calculation rules for different assessment scenarios;

[0051] Based on the assessment results, calculate the total amount of performance payable to each member unit according to the preset accounting rules and standards;

[0052] Each department within each member unit shall make a secondary distribution of employee performance based on the total amount of performance payable and report it.

[0053] In a third aspect, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps in the elevation benchmark data processing method described in the second aspect.

[0054] In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a computer device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the program, the steps in the elevation benchmark data processing method described in the second aspect are implemented.

[0055] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0056] (1) The present invention provides a medical community performance management system, which brings county-level hospitals, township health centers, community health service centers and other grassroots medical and health institutions within the medical community under unified management, and takes into account both basic medical services and basic public health services according to the functional positioning of different member units. The data generated by each medical institution is integrated through the medical community performance management system, and regular assessments and feedback are conducted according to the assessment targets set at the beginning of the period, and the assessment results are linked to the total performance of the member units. Through the performance accounting management module, unified performance accounting of the member units under the jurisdiction of the general hospital is achieved to improve work efficiency. Through the performance distribution management module, the performance data of all employees of the entire medical community are integrated to provide a closed-loop management of the entire process for the relevant performance summary, approval, and issuance.

[0057] (2) The performance appraisal management module provided by the present invention effectively solves the problem of setting a single evaluation rule for different indicators by introducing the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method. It flexibly selects the most suitable appraisal method according to the characteristics of key indicators such as medical quality and public health services, and comprehensively reflects the work effectiveness of medical institutions. At the same time, the module provides standardized evaluation rules for different types of indicators, making the appraisal more scientific and systematic, able to accurately measure work results, effectively guide medical institutions to improve service levels, and meet the complex and diverse performance management needs of the medical community.

[0058] Advantages of additional aspects of the present invention will be given in part in the following description, and in part will become obvious from the following description, or will be learned through practice of the present invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0059] The accompanying drawings constituting a part of the present invention are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention. The exemplary embodiments of the present invention and their description are used to explain the present invention but do not constitute a limitation of the present invention.

[0060] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the structure of a medical community performance appraisal system provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0061] Figure 2 A flow chart of a medical community performance appraisal method provided in an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0062] The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

[0063] Embodiment 1

[0064] like Figure 1 As shown, this embodiment discloses a medical community performance appraisal system, which mainly includes a performance appraisal management module, a performance accounting management module and a performance distribution management module.

[0065] The performance appraisal management module is configured to evaluate and score each member unit in the medical community according to preset appraisal rules and generate appraisal results; the appraisal rules include the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are used to provide corresponding scoring calculation rules for different appraisal scenarios;

[0066] The performance accounting management module is configured to calculate the total amount of performance payable to each member unit based on the assessment results and according to preset accounting rules and standards;

[0067] The performance distribution management module is configured so that each department within each member unit can perform secondary distribution of employee performance based on the total amount of performance payable and report it.

[0068] As a specific implementation method, before the performance appraisal management module, an infrastructure management module is also included to maintain basic information. Specifically, the infrastructure management module includes a medical community management unit, an accounting agency management unit, and an employee information management unit.

[0069] Among them, the medical community management unit is used to add, update or delete medical community member units.

[0070] The accounting organization management unit is used to import the names, types, and hierarchical relationships of member units. Types include county-level hospitals, township health centers, village clinics, and medical community functional management departments.

[0071] The employee information management unit is used to import the personnel roster of each member unit, which includes user number, name, affiliated medical institution, affiliated department, bank card number and performance coefficient information.

[0072] The infrastructure management module of this embodiment can ensure that the basic information of the medical community, accounting institutions and personnel is complete and accurate, and provide reliable data support for subsequent assessment, accounting and allocation.

[0073] (1) Performance Appraisal Management Module

[0074] In this embodiment, the performance appraisal management module includes an appraisal index unit, an index weight unit, a target value unit, an appraisal index decomposition unit, a scoring rule unit, and an appraisal result unit.

[0075] Among them, the assessment indicator unit is used to add or edit assessment indicators in accordance with management requirements, and the assessment indicators include primary indicators and their subdivided secondary indicators; the indicator weight unit is used to set weights for the primary indicators and secondary indicators of each member unit; the target value unit is used to formulate a total target value for each assessment indicator of each member unit; the assessment indicator decomposition unit is used to decompose the total target to each member unit; the scoring rule unit is used to set assessment rules for each assessment indicator of each member unit, and calculate the score of each individual indicator according to the assessment rules; the assessment result unit is used to calculate the final assessment score of each member unit based on each individual indicator, and obtain the assessment result by comparing it with the total target value.

[0076] Specifically, the first-level indicators include financial dimension indicators, medical service capacity indicators, medical service quality and efficiency indicators, and basic public health service indicators; the second-level indicators of financial dimension indicators include medical income, outpatient income, inpatient income, drug income and sanitary materials; the second-level indicators of medical service capacity indicators include outpatient visit rate, emergency visit proportion, discharged patient cure rate and surgery proportion; the second-level indicators of medical service quality and efficiency indicators include the average outpatient cost growth rate, the average inpatient cost growth rate and the proportion of basic drugs; the second-level indicators of basic public health indicators include environmental sanitation of medical institutions, newborn visit rate, postpartum follow-up number of people and elderly health examination rate.

[0077] Among them, the outpatient patient visit rate is the ratio of the number of outpatient patients visiting the hospital in a certain period to the total population of the area, which can more intuitively reflect the degree of utilization of the hospital's outpatient services by the people in the area, as well as the hospital's coverage capacity of local outpatient services.

[0078] The proportion of emergency visits and the ratio of emergency visits to the total number of outpatient and emergency visits can reflect the relative importance and busyness of the hospital's emergency services in the overall medical services, and can also indirectly reflect the hospital's ability to respond to emergency medical needs.

[0079] The cure rate of discharged patients is the ratio of cured patients to the total number of discharged patients. For example, if a department discharges 100 patients in a month, and 80 of them have completely disappeared their symptoms and their physiological indicators have returned to normal after treatment, then the cure rate is 80%. It can reflect the hospital's medical technology level and the treatment effect on the disease. A high cure rate indicates that the hospital has strong capabilities in disease diagnosis, formulation and implementation of treatment plans, and can effectively cure patients and help them recover.

[0080] The surgical proportion is the ratio of the number of surgeries to the number of discharges, reflecting the proportion of surgical treatment in the hospital's overall medical services and embodying the hospital's surgical service capabilities and technical level.

[0081] The growth rate of outpatient and inpatient expenses per visit, where the growth rate is (this period's average cost per visit - last period's average cost per visit) / last period's average cost per visit × 100%, is used to evaluate the hospital's performance in controlling medical expenses by observing the growth trend of expenses, which indirectly reflects the service efficiency and quality. If the cost growth rate is too high, it may mean that medical resources are not used rationally or there is over-medicalization, which affects the quality and efficiency of services.

[0082] The basic drugs are usually safe and effective drugs that have been verified by long-term clinical practice. If the proportion of basic drugs is high, it means that the hospital pays attention to the use of safe, effective and cost-effective drugs in drug selection, which can guarantee the basic needs and safety of patients' medication, and help improve the quality of medical services and the efficiency of drug preparation and use.

[0083] It should be understood that the above indicators are exemplary, and the present embodiment does not provide all the types and names of the indicators. Those skilled in the art may select the indicators as needed.

[0084] In this embodiment, the setting of primary and secondary indicators is as follows: from the perspective of comprehensiveness, the primary indicators cover dimensions such as finance, medical service capacity, quality and efficiency, and basic public health services, which fully reflect the operation status of the medical community; the secondary indicators refine each dimension, such as the financial dimension is measured from different income types and materials, making the assessment more detailed. In terms of pertinence, different indicators target different functional positioning of the medical community. The medical service capacity indicator considers the service volume and encourages the improvement of service level; the medical service quality and efficiency indicator focuses on the proportion of expenses and drugs, promotes reasonable medical care and cost control; the basic public health indicator focuses on key tasks of grassroots public health and protects the health of residents. In terms of fairness, the unified indicator system provides fair assessment standards for each member unit to avoid unfairness caused by inconsistent assessment dimensions. At the same time, these indicators help the medical community to clarify development priorities, guide the division of labor and cooperation among member units, improve the overall quality of medical services and management level, and promote the healthy and sustainable development of the medical community.

[0085] As a specific implementation method, the assessment rules include three types: interval standard method, standard floating method and proportion calculation method.

[0086] 1. Interval Standard Method

[0087] The interval standard method is to delineate different intervals based on the scores of individual indicators. Each interval corresponds to an assessment score and is suitable for assessment scenarios that focus on overall evaluation.

[0088] Specifically, the interval standard method is suitable for some scenarios that do not require high data accuracy and focus more on overall evaluation. For example, for the environmental sanitation assessment of medical institutions, there is no need for quantitative assessment accurate to several decimal places, as long as a rough judgment is made whether it meets the standards. Assume that the assessment criteria are: poor environmental cleanliness, with obvious sanitary dead corners, the score is less than 60 points; the environment is basically clean, with occasional minor flaws, and the score is 60-90 points; the environment is very clean, with no sanitary dead corners, and all sanitary indicators are excellent, with a score of more than 90 points. This assessment method can quickly classify and evaluate the environmental sanitation conditions of medical institutions, without the need for complex calculations, and can quickly make qualitative evaluations of the assessment results.

[0089] 2. Standard Float Method

[0090] The standard floating method calculates the difference between the single indicator score and the single indicator value, and then multiplies it by the score change corresponding to each unit change. It is suitable for assessment scenarios with clear quantitative indicator requirements for medical institutions.

[0091] Specifically, the standard floating method is applicable to situations where there are clear quantitative indicator requirements for medical institutions. For example, for the medical waste treatment compliance rate, assuming that the medical waste treatment compliance rate must reach more than 95%, for every 1% increase, the assessment score increases by 3 points; for every 1% decrease, the assessment score decreases by 3 points, which can be calculated by the following formula:

[0092] Assessment score change = (indicator assessment result - target value) × score change corresponding to each unit change

[0093] The standard floating method can accurately reflect the gap between medical institutions and target values ​​in key indicators, encourage medical institutions to strictly implement industry standards or relevant regulations, and has a strong guiding nature.

[0094] 3. Proportional calculation method

[0095] The proportional calculation method calculates the assessment score based on the ratio of the single indicator score to the single target value. It is suitable for assessment scenarios that focus on the progress of overall goal completion.

[0096] Specifically, the proportion calculation method is applicable to the assessment of the execution of equipment procurement budgets of medical institutions. Assume that a medical community sets an annual equipment procurement budget of 5 million yuan for its subordinate medical institutions. The actual procurement expenditure this month is compared with the target value. If the actual expenditure is 3 million yuan and the completion ratio is 300÷500=60%, the assessment score is 60 points (out of 100 points). This method can accurately measure the execution of equipment procurement budgets of various medical institutions, which is convenient for resource allocation and management decisions.

[0097] The traditional medical community assessment method has limitations and it is difficult to comprehensively and accurately evaluate the complex medical service system. This embodiment takes into account the differences in assessment focus in different scenarios, and creatively introduces the interval standard method, standard floating method and proportional calculation method into the field of medical community performance assessment, scoring and calculating the assessment indicators from different angles, covering different assessment dimensions, so that the assessment results can more comprehensively and accurately reflect the actual situation of the assessed object, avoiding the limitations of a single assessment method.

[0098] The interval standard method adopts a simple and intuitive interval division for scenarios that focus on overall evaluation, abandons the cumbersome pursuit of data accuracy, makes the assessment more practical and efficient, and can quickly conduct qualitative evaluations, providing a new perspective for the assessment of medical communities. The standard floating method has a strong guiding nature and is closely linked to the key quantitative indicators of the medical community. By setting clear target values ​​and score change rules, it can motivate medical institutions to strictly follow industry standards so that every slight change in the compliance rate can be accurately reflected in the assessment score. In scenarios that focus on the progress of the overall goal, the proportion calculation method can accurately measure the execution of each medical institution, calculate the assessment score by the ratio of actual expenditure to the target value, and intuitively reflect the efficiency of each institution in the use of resources, providing a key basis for the medical community to make reasonable resource allocation and management decisions, effectively optimizing resource allocation, and improving overall operational efficiency.

[0099] These three assessment rules complement each other, comprehensively improving the scientificity, effectiveness and pertinence of the medical community's performance assessment, and providing a solid guarantee for the smooth operation and development of the medical community.

[0100] (2) Performance accounting management module

[0101] The performance accounting management module includes a funding source unit, an accounting rule unit, an accounting standard unit, an accounting report unit and an accounting approval unit, which are used to calculate the total performance payable to each member unit based on the assessment results and according to preset accounting rules and standards.

[0102] Among them, the funding source unit is used to maintain the performance funding sources of each member unit, which are divided into four parts: fiscal funds, medical funds, public health funds, and other funds. The accounting rule unit is used to configure and maintain the calculation logic of various funding sources, expenditure items, and special performance. The accounting standard unit is used to maintain the calculation standards such as the provision ratio of various funds, the deduction ratio of cost expenditures, and the surplus withdrawal ratio. The accounting approval unit is used by the General Hospital to approve and reject the financial data reported by each member unit and the total performance data after calculation.

[0103] The accounting rules configure the calculation logic of various funding sources, expenditure items, and special performance, and it clarifies the specific methods and steps in the calculation process of the total performance amount. For example, it stipulates the weights of fiscal funds, medical funds, public health funds and other funds in the calculation of the total performance amount, as well as the calculation method of the relationship between various funds and expenditure items. For special performance, the accounting rules must determine the triggering conditions of special performance, and how to calculate the impact of special performance on the overall performance amount after triggering. For example, when a member unit achieves outstanding results in medical service innovation, the special performance reward amount corresponding to the achievement is determined according to the accounting rules, and it is clarified how this reward is included in the calculation of the overall performance amount.

[0104] The accounting standards are used to enter the provision ratio of various funds, the deduction ratio of cost expenditures, and the ratio of surplus extraction. These standards are quantitative numerical regulations that provide specific numerical basis for the calculation of the total performance amount. For example, it is stipulated that medical funds are accrued according to a certain ratio for performance payment. Assuming that the provision ratio is 10%, when calculating the total performance amount, 10% of the amount is extracted from the medical funds to participate in the calculation. The cost expenditure deduction ratio determines how much cost needs to be deducted from the total funds when calculating the total performance amount. For example, if the cost expenditure deduction ratio is stipulated to be 30%, 30% of the cost is deducted from the total funds before calculating the total performance amount. The surplus extraction ratio clarifies the ratio of extraction for performance adjustment when there is a surplus of funds. For example, if the surplus extraction ratio is 20%, when there is a surplus of funds, 20% of the surplus funds are extracted to adjust the total performance amount.

[0105] The accounting report is the total amount of performance that each member unit should pay in the current period and the specific detailed data of its composition calculated according to the source of funds, accounting rules and accounting standards, and is used to provide the general hospital and the corresponding member unit managers for query and analysis. For example, how much performance is extracted from fiscal funds, medical funds, public health funds, and other funds, how much money is deducted from the corresponding costs, and the final amount of performance.

[0106] The performance accounting management module of this embodiment receives the assessment results to calculate the total amount of performance payable, provides a basis for the secondary distribution of employee performance, ensures that the medical community's performance management process is consistent, scientific, and accurate, and improves management efficiency and fairness.

[0107] (3) Performance distribution management module

[0108] The performance distribution management module includes performance reporting unit, performance approval unit and performance summary unit.

[0109] Among them, the performance reporting unit is used by managers of each department in the member unit to report the performance amount of each employee, and save and submit the data. The performance approval unit is used by performance managers of each member unit to approve and reject the secondary performance distribution results submitted by each department. The performance summary unit is used to summarize the performance results of all employees of each member unit to generate a performance roster for performance distribution.

[0110] In terms of assessment rules, this embodiment innovatively proposes the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are precisely adapted to different assessment scenarios and change the limitations of the traditional single assessment method. In the construction of the assessment system, the modules are divided in detail and the functions are clear. The performance assessment management module covers multiple units, forming a complete chain from indicator setting to result generation; the performance accounting management module strictly controls the source of funds and calculation logic; the performance distribution management module implements a standardized secondary distribution process; the infrastructure management module comprehensively maintains basic information. In terms of indicator design, the first-level indicators comprehensively cover key dimensions such as finance and service capabilities, and the second-level indicators are further refined, which can reflect the work of the member units of the medical community in an all-round and multi-level manner. Compared with traditional solutions, it can better meet the complex performance management needs of the medical community.

[0111] Embodiment 2

[0112] like Figure 2 As shown, this embodiment discloses a medical community performance assessment method, including the following steps:

[0113] S1: Assess and score each member unit in the medical community according to the preset assessment rules and generate assessment results; the assessment rules include the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are used to provide corresponding scoring calculation rules for different assessment scenarios;

[0114] S2: Based on the assessment results, according to the preset accounting rules and standards, calculate the total amount of performance payable to each member unit;

[0115] S3: Each department within each member unit shall make a secondary distribution of employee performance based on the total amount of performance payable and report it.

[0116] As an implementation method, the performance appraisal management module calculates the actual results of each appraisal indicator based on the maintained performance appraisal indicators by calling the data of the HIS system, and calculates the actual score and total score of each appraisal indicator of each member unit based on the set indicator weights, target values, and indicator scoring rules.

[0117] The total assessment score of each member unit is sent to the performance accounting management module, and the total performance amount that can be issued to each member unit is calculated based on the financial income status, cost expenditure status and set performance standards of each member unit.

[0118] The total performance amount that can be issued by each member unit is sent to the performance distribution management module. Each member unit distributes the total performance amount to each department and employee according to the internal performance secondary distribution plan. After the distribution is completed, it is submitted and summarized to generate a performance bonus list.

[0119] Embodiment 3

[0120] This embodiment provides a computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program is stored. When the program is executed by a processor, the steps in the elevation reference data processing method described in the above-mentioned embodiment 2 are implemented.

[0121] Embodiment 4

[0122] This embodiment provides a computer device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the program, the steps in the elevation benchmark data processing method described in the above-mentioned embodiment 2 are implemented.

[0123] The steps or modules involved in the above embodiments 2 to 4 correspond to those in embodiment 1. For the specific implementation, please refer to the relevant description of embodiment 1. The term "computer-readable storage medium" should be understood as a single medium or multiple media including one or more instruction sets; it should also be understood to include any medium that can store, encode or carry an instruction set for execution by a processor and enable the processor to execute any method in the present invention.

[0124] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. For those skilled in the art, the present invention may have various modifications and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A medical community performance appraisal system, characterized in that: include: The performance appraisal management module is configured to evaluate and score each member unit in the medical community according to the preset appraisal rules and generate the appraisal results; The assessment rules include the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are used to provide corresponding scoring calculation rules for different assessment scenarios; The performance accounting management module is configured to calculate the total amount of performance payable to each member unit based on the assessment results and according to preset accounting rules and standards; The performance distribution management module is configured so that each department within each member unit can perform secondary distribution of employee performance based on the total amount of performance payable and report it.

2. A medical community performance appraisal system as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The performance appraisal management module includes an appraisal index unit, an index weight unit, a target value unit, an appraisal index decomposition unit, a scoring rule unit and an appraisal result unit; An assessment indicator unit, used to add or edit assessment indicators according to management requirements. The assessment indicators include primary indicators and their subdivided secondary indicators; The indicator weight unit is used to set the weights of the primary and secondary indicators of each member unit; The target value unit is used to set the total target value for each assessment indicator of each member unit; An assessment indicator decomposition unit is used to decompose the overall goal into each member unit; The scoring rule unit is used to set assessment rules for each assessment indicator of each member unit and calculate the score of each single indicator according to the assessment rules; The assessment result unit is used to calculate the final assessment score of each member unit based on each individual indicator, and obtain the assessment result by comparing it with the total target value.

3. A medical community performance appraisal system as described in claim 2, characterized in that: The first-level indicators include financial dimension indicators, medical service capacity indicators, medical service quality and efficiency indicators, and basic public health service indicators; The secondary indicators of the financial dimension indicators include medical income, outpatient income, inpatient income, drug income and health materials; The secondary indicators of medical service capacity index include outpatient visit rate, emergency visit ratio, discharged patient cure rate and surgical ratio; The secondary indicators of medical service quality and efficiency indicators include the growth rate of average outpatient cost per visit, the growth rate of average inpatient cost per visit and the proportion of basic drugs; The secondary indicators of basic public health indicators include environmental sanitation of medical institutions, neonatal visit rate, number of postpartum follow-up visits and health examination rate of the elderly.

4. A medical community performance appraisal system as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that: The assessment rules include the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are used to provide corresponding scoring calculation rules for different assessment scenarios, specifically: The interval standard method is to define different intervals according to the scores of individual indicators, and each interval corresponds to an assessment score, which is suitable for assessment scenarios that focus on overall evaluation; The standard floating method is to calculate the difference between the score of a single indicator and the value of a single indicator, and then multiply it by the score change corresponding to each unit change. It is suitable for assessment scenarios with clear quantitative indicator requirements for medical institutions. The proportional calculation method is to calculate the assessment score based on the ratio of the single indicator score to the single target value, and is suitable for assessment scenarios that focus on the progress of the overall goal completion.

5. A medical community performance appraisal system as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The performance accounting management module includes a funding source unit, an accounting rule unit, an accounting standard unit, an accounting report unit and an accounting approval unit; The funding source unit is used to input the performance funding sources of each member unit, including fiscal funds, medical funds, public health funds and other funds; The accounting rule unit is used to configure the calculation logic of various funding sources, expenditure items, and special performance; The accounting standard unit is used to input the provision ratio of various funds, the deduction ratio of cost expenditure and the balance extraction ratio; The accounting report unit is used to calculate the total performance amount to be issued to each member unit in the current period and the specific composition detailed data according to the source of funds, accounting rules and accounting standards; The accounting approval unit is used by the general hospital to approve or reject the financial data submitted by each member unit and the total performance data after calculation.

6. A medical community performance appraisal system as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The performance distribution management module includes a performance reporting unit, a performance approval unit and a performance summary unit; The performance reporting unit is used for managers of each department in the member unit to report the performance amount of each employee, save the data and submit it; The performance approval unit is used by performance management personnel of each member unit to approve or reject the secondary performance distribution results submitted by each department; The performance summary unit is used to summarize the performance results of all employees of each member unit to generate a performance list for performance distribution.

7. A medical community performance appraisal system as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: It also includes infrastructure management modules, including the medical community management unit, the accounting agency management unit, and the employee information management unit; The medical community management unit is used to add, update or delete member units of the medical community; The accounting organization management unit is used to import the names, types and hierarchical relationships of member units; the types include county-level hospitals, township health centers, village clinics and medical community functional management departments; The employee information management unit is used to import the personnel roster of each member unit, and the roster includes user number, name, affiliated medical institution, affiliated department, bank card number and performance coefficient information.

8. A medical community performance appraisal method, based on a medical community performance appraisal system as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: include: Assess and score each member unit in the medical community according to the preset assessment rules and generate assessment results; The assessment rules include the interval standard method, the standard floating method and the proportion calculation method, which are used to provide corresponding scoring calculation rules for different assessment scenarios; Based on the assessment results, calculate the total amount of performance payable to each member unit according to the preset accounting rules and standards; Each department within each member unit shall make a secondary distribution of employee performance based on the total amount of performance payable and report it.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the program is executed by the processor, the steps in the medical community performance evaluation method as described in claim 8 are implemented.

10. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that: When the processor executes the program, it implements the steps in the medical community performance evaluation method as described in claim 8.

Images