Method for evaluating research and development capabilities and distribution indexes of various departments by enterprise

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for evaluating research and development capability and distribution indexes of each department by an enterprise, and the method comprises the following steps: firstly, carrying out the sampling analysis of enterprise patent data, constructing a first inventor educational background and post distribution matrix A, and carrying out the normalization processing to obtain a matrix B; meanwhile, counting the whole educational background and post distribution condition of the enterprise to form a matrix C; then, calculating the ratio of corresponding elements of B and C to obtain a research and development capability relative value matrix X; thirdly, according to the actual distribution of the personnel of each department, constructing a department matrix Y, and multiplying the department matrix Y by the corresponding elements of the X to obtain a research and development capability matrix Z of each department; further calculating the research and development capability representative value Zi of each department, and combining the values into a vector Z; and finally, performing normalization processing on Z to obtain an enterprise research and development capability distribution vector alpha, and realizing scientific distribution of patent indexes. According to the method, factors are comprehensively considered, the universality is high, and the enterprise management efficiency can be effectively improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of scientific and technological management of innovative enterprises, and in particular to a method for an enterprise to evaluate the R & D capabilities of each department and allocate indicators. Background Art

[0002] The development process of enterprise scientific and technological management work is as follows: establishing an effective R & D mechanism to encourage employees to put forward new ideas and new technologies, enabling the enterprise to continuously launch new products or improve existing products, usually manifested in forms such as scientific and technological projects and intellectual property achievements, thereby enhancing the competitiveness of the enterprise and promoting the sustainable development of the enterprise.

[0003] However, for existing innovative enterprises, scientific and technological management work becomes more difficult as the enterprise scale expands and becomes more complex, and the number of intellectual property achievements is also increasing, making it difficult to manage. The enterprise divides all personnel into each sector by department, and the number of personnel, the educational background composition of personnel, and the nature of personnel positions in each department are also different. It is difficult for scientific and technological managers to directly evaluate the high and low R & D capabilities of each department. When issuing intellectual property indicators such as patents to each department, it is difficult to accurately allocate according to the high and low capabilities without data as a basis, and even lead to contradictions with departments. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is: to provide a method for an enterprise to evaluate the R & D capabilities of each department and allocate indicators.

[0005] The technical solution adopted by the present invention to solve its technical problems is: a method for an enterprise to evaluate the R & D capabilities of each department and allocate indicators, including the following steps.

[0006] S1. Sample the existing patents of the enterprise, with the total number of samples being N, obtain the data of the number distribution of the first inventors of the patents in each educational background and each position, and list the data results in matrix A.

[0007] S2. Divide the sampling result matrix by the number of sampled patents N to obtain the matrix B of the proportion of the first inventors in each educational background and position, where B = A / N, and the distribution law of the matrix elements is the same as that of matrix A.

[0008] S3. Count the number distribution of each educational background and each position in the enterprise, and list the results in matrix C. The distribution law of the matrix elements is the same as that of matrix A.

[0009] S4. Calculate the relative value of the R & D capabilities of the personnel in each educational background and position distribution. The R & D capability matrix is X, X = B. / C, that is, the ratio of the elements at the corresponding positions of the two matrices, x ij = b ij / c ij ; b ij , c ij are the elements in matrices B and C respectively.

[0010] S5. Obtain the data on the distribution of personnel with different educational backgrounds and positions in each department, and list them in matrix form according to the element distribution law of matrix A. The personnel distribution matrices of each department are Y (1) , Y (2) , Y (3) ...;

[0011] S6. Multiply the elements in the corresponding positions of matrices Y (1) , Y (2) , Y (3) ... with the elements in the corresponding positions of X respectively to obtain the R & D ability value matrices Z (1) , Z (2) , Z (3) ...;

[0012] S7. Calculate the R & D ability representative values Z1, Z2, Z3... of each department respectively;

[0013] S8. Combine the R & D ability representative values of each department into a vector Z, Z = [Z1, Z2, Z3,...] T , assuming there are l departments in total, divide the vector Z by the value to obtain the R & D ability distribution of the enterprise α = [α1, α2, α3,...] T , where α i = Z i / Z;

[0014] S9. Allocate patent indicators to each department according to the R & D ability of personnel.

[0015] Furthermore, in step S4 of the present invention, the ratio x ij of the elements in the corresponding positions of the two matrices. The larger the ratio, the higher the frequency of patent publication by this group, that is, the relatively higher the R & D ability of the enterprise in this educational background and position.

[0016] Furthermore, in step S7 of the present invention, the R & D ability representative value of each department is the sum of the values of all elements in the matrix.

[0017] Furthermore, in step S9 of the present invention, if the enterprise needs to complete W patents in the new year, the vector composed of the indicator quantities that each department needs to complete is γ = W·α, and each element γ1, γ2, etc. is the indicator quantity allocated to each department.

[0018] Furthermore, the present invention also includes steps,

[0019] S10. If it is necessary to adjust the R & D index allocation rule while taking into account the past actual performance of each department, it is necessary to additionally count the proportion of the number of patents published by each department in the previous year, that is, the vector β = [β1, β2, β3,...] T , and define the influence factor θ (0 ≤ θ ≤ 1) of the actual performance according to the enterprise situation and personnel opinions, then the index allocation vector is corrected to γ = W · [θβ + (1 - θ)α]. When θ = 0, it is completely allocated according to the R & D capabilities of the personnel in each department. When θ = 1, it is completely allocated according to the performance of each department in the previous year.

[0020] Furthermore, if other factors are introduced to correct the present invention, multiple influence factors can be introduced as the coefficients of the vectors of each influencing factor, and the coefficient of α is 1 minus the sum of these influence factors.

[0021] The beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: it solves the defects existing in the background technology

[0022] 1. The present invention has a scientific basis and rigorous calculation, and reduces the situations of causing personnel objections and contradictions during the index allocation process;

[0023] 2. The present invention takes into account the influence of the number of people, educational level of personnel, and nature of work in each department on the ability to do R & D work, and comprehensively considers various factors in the evaluation, and accurately evaluates the R & D capabilities;

[0024] 3. The present invention has strong universality, can be modified and used in various fields, has a simple calculation principle, and can be used for program writing and further used in software. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] Figure 1 It is a schematic flow chart of the method of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0026] Now, the present invention will be further described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and preferred embodiments. These drawings are all simplified schematic diagrams, only showing the basic structure of the present invention in a schematic way, so they only show the components related to the present invention.

[0027] As Figure 1 shown, a method for an enterprise to evaluate the R & D capabilities of each department and allocate indexes quantifies the R & D levels of each department for two dimensions (educational background and nature of the post) of enterprise R & D, and can be compared. Using the form of matrix and vector makes it more visual and convenient for operation; using the sampling principle, analyzes the high and low situations of the ability to publish patents for each educational background and each post, representing the R & D capabilities of personnel in each dimension, making the ability evaluation method and index allocation persuasive; the setting of parameters involved in the method can be flexibly changed, can be modified according to the situations of different enterprises, and the correction factors introduced in the results can also be formulated according to the actual situations.

[0028] The specific steps are as follows. In the steps, the letters in bold are matrices or vectors, and the non-bold ones are numerical values;

[0029] S1. Sample the existing patents of the enterprise. The total number of samples is N. Count the number distribution of the first inventors of the patents in each education level and each position. The names and quantities of the two dimensions of education level and position can be determined according to the enterprise structure. Assume that there are m positions and n education levels. For example, the education levels (high school and below, junior college, undergraduate, master, doctor), and the positions (operation position, technical position, marketing position, management position, functional position). As shown in the figure, the statistical results are listed in matrix A;

[0030]

[0031] S2. Divide the sampling result matrix by the number of sampled patents N to obtain the proportion matrix B of the first inventors in each education level and position, where B = A / N, and the distribution rule of the matrix elements is the same as that of matrix A;

[0032] S3. Count the number distribution of each education level and each position in the enterprise, and the results are listed in matrix C. The distribution rule of the matrix elements is the same as that of matrix A;

[0033] S4. Calculate the relative R & D ability values of the personnel in each education level and position distribution. The R & D ability matrix is X, X = B. / C, that is, the ratio of the elements in the corresponding positions of the two matrices, x ij = b ij / c ij , the larger this ratio, the higher the frequency of patent publication of this group, that is, the relatively higher the R & D ability of this education level and position in the enterprise;

[0034] S5. Count the personnel distribution of education level and position in each department, and list them in matrix form according to the element distribution rule of matrix A. The personnel distribution matrices of departments 1, 2, 3... are Y (1) , Y (2) , Y (3) ...;

[0035] S6. Multiply each element of Y (1) by the corresponding elements in X to obtain Z (1) , which is the R & D ability value matrix of department 1, and repeat this method to obtain Z (2) , Z (3) etc.;

[0036] S7. Calculate the representative R & D ability values of each department. For example, the representative R & D ability value of department 1 that is, the sum of the values of each element of the matrix. This value is closely related to the number and composition of the personnel in this department. Repeat this method to obtain Z2, Z3, etc.;

[0037] S8. Combine the representative R & D ability values of each department into a vector Z, where Z = [Z1, Z2, Z3,...] T , assuming there are l departments in total, divide the vector Z by the value to obtain the R & D ability distribution of the enterprise α = [α1, α2, α3,...] T , where α i = Z i / Z;

[0038] S9. Allocate patent indicators to each department according to the R & D ability of personnel. If the enterprise needs to complete W patents in the new year, the vector composed of the indicator quantities that each department needs to complete is γ = W·α, and each element γ1, γ2, etc. are the indicator quantities allocated to each department;

[0039] S10. If it is necessary to adjust the R & D indicator allocation rule by taking into account the past actual performance of each department, it is necessary to additionally count the proportion of the number of patents published by each department in the previous year, that is, the vector β = [β1, β2, β3,...] T , and define the influence factor θ (0 ≤ θ ≤ 1) of the actual performance according to the enterprise situation and personnel opinions, then the indicator allocation vector is corrected to γ = W·[θβ + (1 - θ)α]. When θ = 0, it is allocated completely according to the R & D ability of each department's personnel, and when θ = 1, it is allocated completely according to the performance of each department in the previous year;

[0040] If other factors are considered for correction, multiple influence factors can be introduced as the coefficients of each influencing factor vector. The coefficient of α is 1 minus the sum of these influence factors; it is also possible to allocate other indicators such as papers according to this method, and it can also be used not only in the field of scientific and technological management, but also to achieve the purpose of evaluation and allocation in other fields by adjusting the personnel composition dimension of matrix A.

[0041] What is described in the above specification is only the specific implementation manner of the present invention. Various examples do not constitute a limitation to the substantive content of the present invention. Those of ordinary skill in the art can make modifications or deformations to the previously described specific implementation manner after reading the specification without departing from the essence and scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the R&D capabilities and allocation indicators of each department of an enterprise, characterized by: The following steps are included: S1. Sample the existing patents of the enterprise, with a total sampling of N, obtain the distribution data of the number of first inventors of the patents in various educational backgrounds and positions, and list the data results in matrix A; S2. Divide the sampling result matrix by the number of sampled patents N to obtain the first inventor ratio matrix B of each educational background and position, where B = A / N, and the distribution pattern of matrix elements is the same as that of matrix A; S3. Count the distribution of employees of different educational backgrounds and positions in the enterprise, and list the results in matrix C. The distribution pattern of matrix elements is the same as that of matrix A. S4. Calculate the relative value of the R&D capability of personnel with different educational backgrounds and job positions. The R&D capability matrix is ​​X, X = B. / C, that is, the ratio of the elements in the corresponding positions of the two matrices, x ij =b ij / c ij ; b ij , c ij are the elements in matrices B and C respectively; S5. Obtain the data on the distribution of personnel by educational background and position in each department, and list them in matrix form according to the element distribution rule of matrix A. The personnel distribution matrix of each department is Y (1) , Y (2) , Y (3) ...; S6. Respectively transform the matrix Y (1) , Y (2) , Y (3) ...and the corresponding elements of X are multiplied to obtain the R&D capability value matrix Z of each department. (1) ,Z (2) , Z (3) ...; S7. Calculate the representative value of R&D capability of each department Z2, Z2, Z3… respectively; S8. Combine the representative values ​​of the R&D capabilities of each department into a vector Z, Z = [Z1, Z2, Z3, ...] T , assuming there are l departments, divide the vector Z by the value That is, the distribution of the company's R&D capabilities α=[α1,α2,α3,...] T , where α i =Z i / Z; S9. Allocate patent quotas to each department based on personnel R&D capabilities.

2. A method for evaluating the R&D capabilities and allocation indicators of each department of an enterprise as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In step S4, the ratio x of the elements at the corresponding positions of the two matrices is ij The larger the ratio is, the higher the frequency of patent publication in this group, which means that the R&D capability of the enterprise with this degree and position is relatively higher.

3. The method for evaluating the R&D capabilities and allocation indicators of each department of an enterprise as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In step S7, the representative value of the R&D capability of each department That is, the sum of the values ​​of all the elements in the matrix.

4. The method for evaluating the R&D capabilities and allocation indicators of each department of an enterprise as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: In step S9, if the enterprise needs to complete W patents in the new year, the vector composed of the number of indicators that each department needs to complete is γ=W·α, and each element γ1, γ2, etc. is the number of indicators allocated to each department.

5. The method for evaluating the R&D capabilities and allocation indicators of each department of an enterprise as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes the steps, S10. If it is necessary to adjust the R&D indicator allocation rules by taking into account the actual performance of each department in the past, it is necessary to additionally calculate the proportion of patents published by each department in the previous year, that is, vector β = [β1, β2, β3, ...] T , and define the influencing factor θ (0≤θ≤1) of actual performance based on the company's situation and personnel opinions, then the indicator allocation vector is corrected to γ=W·[θβ+(1-θ)α], when θ=0, it is allocated entirely according to the R&D capabilities of personnel in each department, and when θ=1, it is allocated entirely according to the performance of each department in the previous year.

6. A method for evaluating the R&D capabilities and allocation indicators of each department of an enterprise as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that: If other factors are used for correction, multiple influencing factors can be introduced as coefficients of each influencing factor vector, and the coefficient of α is 1 minus the sum of these influencing factors.

Images