Soil control project implementation process health degree evaluation method

Abstract

The invention discloses a soil control project implementation process health degree evaluation method. The method comprises the steps of building a bidding and tendering stage evaluation model, building a construction stage evaluation model and building a project acceptance stage evaluation model. According to the method, the health degree is introduced into the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project, a complete health degree evaluation system is established by combining multiple factors such as the implementation progress and the implementation effect, detailed evaluation indexes and evaluation methods are included, and the health state of the environmental pollution prevention and control project is comprehensively evaluated; problems occurring in project implementation can be found and solved in time, and a comprehensive scientific basis is provided for sustainable implementation of the project.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of soil prevention and control, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating the health degree in the implementation process of a soil prevention and control project. Background Art

[0002] In the process of promoting the implementation of soil prevention and control projects, the lag of project progress is worrying. Due to the diversity and uncertainty of soil pollution conditions, as well as the interference of various external factors, the project progress is often difficult to proceed as planned. In addition, during the project implementation process, technical problems, construction problems, etc. may be encountered, resulting in the stagnation of the project progress. Moreover, the difficulty in collecting project data cannot be ignored. To accurately evaluate the implementation of soil pollution prevention and control projects, a large amount of data on the project implementation process needs to be collected. However, due to the lack of a unified data collection and management mechanism, the collection of these data is very difficult. Some projects cannot even provide complete and accurate data, which makes it more difficult to evaluate the project effect and make scientific decisions. In addition, some projects may have problems such as construction conflicts and uneven resource allocation, which will all have a negative impact on the implementation effect of the project. To promote the smooth implementation of soil prevention and control projects, it is very necessary to develop a method for evaluating the health degree in the implementation process of soil prevention and control projects. Summary of the Invention

[0003] The first object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the health degree in the implementation process of a soil prevention and control project.

[0004] The second object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the health degree in the implementation process of a regional soil prevention and control project.

[0005] The first object of the present invention is achieved as follows. The method for evaluating the health degree in the implementation process of a soil prevention and control project includes the following steps: S1. Construct an evaluation model for the bidding stage: S101. Evaluation of the clarity of project objectives and plans: If there are both project objectives and project plans, assign a value of 15; if there are no project objectives or project plans, assign a value of 0. S102. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign a value of 15; if it is not clear, assign a value of 0. S103. Project progress evaluation: (1)Evaluation during the bidding preparation stage: Calculate the lag value Z1 during the bidding preparation stage according to the formula. Δt1 = T2 - T0 - 30, Z1 = (Δt1 - 60) / 60×100%, where Δt1 is the actual preparation time, T2 is the date of reporting, and T0 is the date of fund allocation. If the lag value ≤ 10%, assign 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign 0; (2)Evaluation during the ongoing bidding stage: If the bidding preparation stage proceeds normally, calculate the lag value Z2 according to the formula. Δt2 = T2 - T3 - (60 - Δt1), Z2 = (Δt2 - 30) / 30×100%, where Δt2 is the actual bidding time, T2 is the date of reporting, T3 is the date of the bidding announcement, and Δt1 is the actual preparation time. If the lag value ≤ 10%, assign 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign 0; If there is a lag in the bidding preparation stage, calculate the lag value Z3 according to the formula. Δt3 = T2 - T3 + (Δt1 - 60), Z3 = (Δt3 - 30) / 30×100%, where Δt3 is the actual bidding time, T2 is the date of reporting, T3 is the date of the bidding announcement, and Δt1 is the actual preparation time. Z3 is the lag value. If the lag value ≤ 10%, assign 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign 0; Take the average of the evaluation assignment in the bidding preparation stage and the evaluation assignment in the ongoing bidding stage, which is the evaluation result of the project progress; S104. Sum up all the assignment results in step S1, which is the health degree of the bidding stage; S2. Construct an evaluation model for the non - engineering construction stage: S201. Evaluation of the clarity of project objectives and plans: If there are project objectives, assign 5; if there are no project objectives, assign 0; if there are project plans, assign 5; if there are no project plans, assign 0; S202. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign 5; if it is not clear, assign 0; S203. Project progress evaluation: (1)Evaluation of the completion status of bidding and tendering: Calculate the lag value Z1 of the completion status of bidding and tendering according to the formula Z1 = (T2 - T0) / T0, where T2 is the actual time on the reporting day; T0 is the planned time; when the lag value ≤ 10%, assign 15; when 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 13; when 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 11; when 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 9; when 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 7; when completed but lag ≥ 100%, assign 5; (2)Evaluation of the project implementation progress: Calculate the lag value Z2 of the project implementation progress according to the formula t1 = T2 × T3, Z2 = (T4 - t1) / T3 × 100%, where t1 is the planned progress time; T2 is the reported progress; T3 is the total project implementation time; T4 is the actual progress time; when the lag value ≤ 10%, assign 15; when 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 12; when 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 9; when 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 6; when 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 3; when the lag value = 100%, assign 0; Sum up all the assignment results of S203, which is the evaluation result of the project progress; S204. Evaluation of the project quantity: If there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual assignment A, A = M1 / M 总 × 20, where M1 is the actual completed quantity and M 总 is the planned total quantity; If there are multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual assignment B, a = 20 / b, A n = M n / M 总 × a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, A n is the actual score value of each target, M n is the actual completed quantity of each target, M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; S205. Evaluation of the project benefits: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign 5; if materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign 0; S206. Evaluation of satisfaction: According to the percentage-based satisfaction results of the public and government departments, if the satisfaction ≥ 90%, assign 10; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assignment A1 according to the formula A1 = S × 10, where S is the satisfaction; S207. Evaluation of the fund execution rate: Calculate the difference between the percentage of funds disbursed and the percentage of project implementation progress. If the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 20; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 16; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 12; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 8; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 4; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0; Sum up all the assigned results in Step S2, which is the health degree during the construction stage; S3. Construct an evaluation model for the acceptance stage of non - engineering projects: S301. Evaluation of the clarity of project goals and plans: If there are project goals, assign a value of 2.5; if there are no project goals, assign a value of 0; if there are project plans, assign a value of 2.5; if there are no project plans, assign a value of 0; S302. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign a value of 5; if it is not clear, assign a value of 0; S303. Project progress evaluation: (1) Evaluation of the completion of bidding: Calculate the lag value Z1 of the bidding completion according to the formula Z1 = (T2 - T0) / T0, where T2 is the actual time on the reported day; T0 is the planned time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 14; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 10; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 8; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 6; if it has been completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 5; (2) Evaluation of project implementation progress: Calculate the lag value Z2 of the project implementation progress according to the formula t1 = T2×T3, Z2 = (T1 - t1) / T3×100%, where t1 is the planned completion time, T1 is the actual completion time, and T3 is the total project implementation time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 14; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 10; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 8; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 6; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 5; Sum up all the assigned results in Step S303, which is the project progress evaluation result; S304. Project benefit evaluation: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 5; if materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 0; S305. Satisfaction evaluation: According to the percentage - based satisfaction results of the public and government departments, if the satisfaction ≥ 90%, assign a value of 5; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assigned value A1 according to the formula A1 = S×5, where S is the satisfaction; S306. Project technical acceptance evaluation: (1)Evaluation of project effect review: Assign values according to the number of times of review passing. Assign 5 for passing at the first time, 3 for passing at the second time, and 1 for the number of passing times ≥ 3. If no effect evaluation is required, the default value is 5; (2)Evaluate the project completion requirements: When there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual assigned value A, A = M1 / M 总 ×10, where M1 is the actual completed quantity and M 总 is the planned total quantity; When there are multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual assigned value B, a = 10 / b, A n = M n / M 总 ×a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, and A n is the actual score value of each target, M n is the actual completed quantity of each target, and M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; Sum up all the assigned values in step S306, which is the evaluation result of project technical acceptance; S307. Evaluation of fund audit acceptance: Provide a third-party fund audit report and assign 5; Do not provide a third-party fund audit report and assign 0; S308. Evaluation of data integrity acceptance: (1)Provide project implementation plan or feasibility study report materials and assign 2.5; Do not provide project implementation plan or feasibility study report materials and assign 0; (2)Provide materials in the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage and assign 2.5. Do not provide materials in the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage and assign 0; Sum up all the assigned values in step S308, which is the evaluation result of data integrity acceptance; S309. Evaluation of acceptance process: Assign values according to the number of times of passing based on the expert review opinions of project results or the opinions of project acceptance experts. Assign 5 for passing at the first time, 3 for passing at the second time, and 1 for the number of passing times ≥ 3. If not provided, assign 0; S310. Evaluation of acceptance fund execution rate: Calculate the difference between the fund execution percentage and the progress percentage. If the difference ≤ 10%, assign 10; If 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign 8; If 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign 6; If 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign 4; If 70% < difference < 100%, assign 2; If the difference = 100%, assign 0; S311. Hazardous waste management evaluation: If a management specification form for hazardous waste is provided, assign a value of 3; if not, assign a value of 0. S312. Inspection and monitoring situation evaluation: If a regular inspection form is provided, assign a value of 3; if not, assign a value of 0. S313. Public complaint situation evaluation: If there are public complaint opinions, assign a value of 0; if not, assign a value of 3. S314. Pollution incident occurrence situation evaluation: If a pollution incident occurs, assign a value of 0; if not, assign a value of 3. Sum up all the assigned results in step S3, which is the health degree at the project acceptance stage.

[0006] Preferably, if 90 < health degree ≤ 100, the health degree is excellent; if 80 < health degree ≤ 90, the health degree is good; if 70 < health degree ≤ 80, the health degree is average; if 60 < health degree ≤ 70, the health degree is poor; if health degree ≤ 60, the health degree is very poor.

[0007] Preferably, if there are changes during the construction stage, step S2 also includes constructing an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there are change plans, change approvals, and expert review opinions on the change plans, assign a value of 5; if not, assign a value of 0. Replace the evaluation of the completion situation of project progress (1) bidding in step S203 with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 3; if completed but lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 2. Replace the evaluation of the project implementation progress (1) in step S203 with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if lag value = 100%, assign a value of 0. Replace the satisfaction evaluation in step S206 with: According to the satisfaction results of the public and government departments in percentage, if the satisfaction ≥ 90%, assign a value of 5; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assigned value A1 according to the formula A1 = S × 5, where S is the satisfaction. Replace the evaluation of the fund execution rate in step S207 with: Calculate the difference between the fund appropriation percentage and the project implementation progress percentage. If the difference ≤ 5%, assign a value of 20; if 5% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 14; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 10; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 2; if difference = 100%, assign a value of 0.

[0008] Preferably, if a change occurs during the project acceptance stage, step S3 further includes constructing an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: if there is a change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 2; if there is no change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 0; Replace the evaluation of the completion of the bidding process in the project progress evaluation (1) of S303 with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 1; Replace the evaluation of the project implementation progress in the project progress evaluation (2) of S303 with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 1; Replace the evaluation of the acceptance fund execution rate in S310 with: calculate the difference between the fund execution percentage and the progress percentage. If the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 8; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 6; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 4; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 2; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 1; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0.

[0009] Preferably, step S2 is replaced with constructing an evaluation model for the construction stage of engineering projects; Step S203 further includes (3) effect evaluation: by default, assign a value of 10 if the effect evaluation is not required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign a value of 10; if not, assign a value of 0; Replace the project benefit evaluation in S205 with: if no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 10; Replace the assignment of the evaluation of the fund execution rate in step S207 with: if the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 10; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 8; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 6; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 4; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0; The remaining parts of step S2 are the same; Step S3 is replaced with constructing an evaluation model for the acceptance stage of engineering projects; Step S303 further includes (3) effect evaluation: by default, assign a value of 5 if the effect evaluation is not required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign a value of 5; if not, assign a value of 0; Replace the project benefit evaluation in step S304 with: if no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 3; Replace the evaluation of the project technical acceptance in step 306 (1) the evaluation of the project effect review with: assign values according to the number of times of passing the review. Assign 3 for passing the review once, 2 for passing the review twice, and assign 1 if the number of passing times ≥ 3; if there is no need to conduct an effect evaluation, the default value is 3; Replace the evaluation of the project technical acceptance in step 306 (2) the evaluation of the project completion requirements with: If there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual value A, A = M1 / M 总 × 7, where M1 is the actual completed quantity and M 总 is the planned total quantity; If there are multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual value B, a = 7 / b, A n = M n / M 总 × a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, and A n is the actual score value of each target, M n is the actual completed quantity of each target, and M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; Replace the evaluation of the fund audit acceptance in step S307 with: provide a third-party fund audit report and assign 3; Replace the evaluation of the data integrity acceptance in step S308 with: (1) provide the project implementation plan or feasibility study report data and assign 1.5; (2) provide the data in the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage and assign 1.5; Replace the evaluation of the acceptance process in step S309 with: (1) Preliminary acceptance evaluation: provide a preliminary acceptance opinion and assign 2; if not provided, assign 0; (2) Timeliness evaluation: assign values according to the number of times of passing the acceptance. Assign 7 for passing the acceptance once, 4 for passing the acceptance twice, and assign 3 if the number of passing times ≥ 3; if the acceptance is not carried out on time, then take 90 days as the total acceptance time, and score according to the acceptance lag situation. The lag value Z4 is calculated by the formula: △t2 = T4 - T5, Z4 = (△t2 - 90) / 90 × 100%, where △t2 is the actual acceptance days, T4 is the actual acceptance time, and T5 is the starting acceptance time; (3) Evaluation of the single project acceptance opinion: provide the single project acceptance opinion form and assign 2; if not provided, assign 0; Sum up all the assigned results in step S309, and the result is the evaluation result of the acceptance process; The remaining steps are the same.

[0010] Preferably, if a change occurs during the engineering construction phase, step S2 further includes constructing an evaluation model for the progress of project change work: if there is a change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 5; if there is no change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 0; The evaluation assignment for the completion status of bidding in step S203(1) is replaced with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 9; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 7; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 5; The evaluation assignment for the project implementation progress in step S203(2) is replaced with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 0; Step S203 further includes (3) effect evaluation: by default, assign a value of 10 if the effect evaluation is not required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign a value of 10; if not, assign a value of 0; Replace the project benefit evaluation in S205 with: if no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 5; Replace the evaluation assignment of the fund execution rate in step S207 with: if the difference ≤ 5%, assign a value of 10; if 5% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 7; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 5; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 3; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 1; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0; If a change occurs during the engineering acceptance phase, step S3 further includes constructing an evaluation model for the progress of project change work: if there is a change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 2; if there is no change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 0; Replace the evaluation of the completion status of bidding in the project progress evaluation (1) of S303 with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 7; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 5; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 3; Replace the evaluation of the project implementation progress in the project progress evaluation (2) of S303 with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 7; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 5; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 3; The evaluation of the implementation rate of the acceptance funds in S310 is replaced with: if the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 8; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 6; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 4; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 2; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 1; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0; The remaining steps are the same.

[0011] Preferably, if the change in the project acceptance stage is a major change, the evaluation of the project progress in S303 is replaced with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 10; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 4; if it has been completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 2; The evaluation of the implementation rate of the acceptance funds in S310 is replaced with: if the difference ≤ 5%, assign a value of 8; if 5% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 6; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 4; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 2; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 1; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0.

[0012] The second object of the present invention is achieved as follows. The health degree of the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project in this area is calculated using the following formula: where n is the number of projects that have been done in this area, m is the total number of projects that need to be done in this area, V i is the amount of government support funds for each project, and H i is the health degree calculated for each project according to the health degree evaluation method of the soil prevention and control project implementation process described in any one of claims 1 to 7, and W is the health degree of the soil prevention and control project implementation process in this area.

[0013] Preferably, if 90 < health degree ≤ 100, the health degree is excellent; if 80 < health degree ≤ 90, the health degree is good; if 70 < health degree ≤ 80, the health degree is average; if 60 < health degree ≤ 70, the health degree is poor; if the health degree ≤ 60, the health degree is very poor.

[0014] During the actual investigation process, it was found that the current soil pollution prevention and control projects are mainly divided into two types: engineering projects and non-engineering projects. Engineering projects mainly refer to the physical engineering measures taken to solve soil pollution problems. The characteristics of such projects are that they require a large amount of manpower, material resources and financial resources, and comprehensive engineering measures are taken to achieve the goal of soil pollution control. For example, waste residue / sediment remediation projects, safe utilization projects for agricultural land, and risk control or remediation projects for construction land, etc. Non-engineering projects refer to projects that prevent soil pollution through non-engineering methods. For example, waste residue / sediment investigation projects, cultivated land cause investigation projects, agricultural land plot investigation projects, construction land plot investigation projects, preparation of risk control and remediation plans for polluted plots, soil investigation projects around key industries enterprises, soil investigation projects around key soil pollution supervision enterprises, etc.

[0015] Further, according to whether the project changes, it is divided into unchanged and changed, and evaluation methods for the bidding stage, implementation stage, and acceptance stage in the unchanged and changed states are constructed.

[0016] The indicators involved in the evaluation system of the present invention are further described, as shown in the following table.

[0017] 。

[0018] Advantages of the present invention: 1. The present invention introduces health degree into the implementation process of soil prevention and control projects, combines various factors such as implementation progress and implementation effect, and establishes a complete health degree evaluation system, including detailed evaluation indicators and evaluation methods, to comprehensively evaluate the health status of environmental pollution prevention and control projects, so as to timely discover and solve problems arising in project implementation, and provide a comprehensive scientific basis for the sustainable implementation of the project; 2. It has been verified that the evaluation index system and evaluation method of the present invention can comprehensively and objectively evaluate the health degree of soil pollution prevention and control projects; 3. The present invention establishes corresponding evaluation index systems and assignment standards for different types of projects; this can not only better reflect the characteristics and requirements of the projects, but also make the evaluation of different types of projects more scientific and objective; 4. The method of the present invention also realizes the evaluation of the health degree of the implementation process of soil prevention and control projects in a certain regional scope (such as provinces, cities, counties), providing strong support for the sustainable implementation of regional environmental pollution prevention and control projects. Specific implementation manners

[0019] The following further illustrates the present invention in conjunction with embodiments, but does not limit the present invention in any way. Any transformation or replacement based on the teachings of the present invention belongs to the protection scope of the present invention.

[0020] Example 1 A health assessment method for the implementation process of a soil prevention and control project in a non-engineering field, including the following steps: S1. Construct an evaluation model for the bidding stage: S101. Evaluation of the clarity of project objectives and plans: If there are both project objectives and project plans, assign a value of 15; if there are no project objectives or project plans, assign a value of 0; S102. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign a value of 15; if it is not clear, assign a value of 0; S103. Evaluation of project progress: (1) Evaluation of the bidding preparation stage: Calculate the lag value Z1 of the bidding preparation stage according to the formula, △t1 = T2 - T0 - 30, Z1 = (△t1 - 60) / 60×100%, where △t1 is the actual preparation time, T2 is the time of reporting on the day, and T0 is the time of fund allocation; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign a value of 0; (2) Evaluation of the ongoing bidding stage: If the bidding preparation stage is proceeding normally, calculate the lag value Z2 according to the formula, △t2 = T2 - T3 - (60 - △t1), Z2 = (△t2 - 30) / 30×100%, where △t2 is the actual bidding time, T2 is the time of reporting on the day, T3 is the bidding announcement time, and △t1 is the actual preparation time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign a value of 0; If there is a lag in the bidding preparation stage, calculate the lag value Z3 according to the formula, △t3 = T2 - T3 + (△t1 - 60), Z3 = (△t3 - 30) / 30×100%, where △t3 is the actual bidding time, T2 is the time of reporting on the day, T3 is the bidding announcement time, and △t1 is the actual preparation time, Z3 is the lag value, and △t3 is the actual bidding time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign a value of 0; Take the average of the evaluation assignment in the bidding preparation stage and the evaluation assignment in the ongoing bidding stage as the evaluation result of project progress; S104. Sum up all the assignment results in step S1, which is the health degree during the bidding stage. S2. Construct an evaluation model for the non - engineering construction stage: S201. Evaluation of the clarity of project goals and plans: If there are project goals, assign a value of 5; if there are no project goals, assign a value of 0; if there are project plans, assign a value of 5; if there are no project plans, assign a value of 0. S202. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign a value of 5; if it is not clear, assign a value of 0. S203. Project progress evaluation: (1) Evaluation of the completion of bidding: Calculate the lag value Z1 of the bidding completion according to the formula Z1 = (T2 - T0) / T0, where T2 is the actual time on the reporting day; T0 is the planned time; when the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 15; when 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 13; when 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 11; when 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 9; when 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 7; when it is completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 5. (2) Evaluation of the project implementation progress: Calculate the lag value Z2 of the project implementation progress according to the formula t1 = T2×T3, Z2 = (T4 - t1) / T3×100%, where t1 is the planned progress time; T2 is the reported progress; T3 is the total project implementation time; T4 is the actual progress time; when the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 15; when 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; when 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; when 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; when 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 3; when the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 0. Sum up all the assignment results in S203, which is the project progress evaluation result. S204. Project quantity evaluation: When there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual assignment A, A = M1 / M 总 ×20, where M1 is the actual completed quantity and M 总 is the planned total quantity; When there are multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual assignment B, a = 20 / b, A n = M n / M 总 ×a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, A n is the actual score value of each target, M n is the actual completed quantity of each target, M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; S205. Project benefit evaluation: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 5; if materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 0; S206. Satisfaction evaluation: Based on the satisfaction results of the general public and government departments on a percentage basis, if the satisfaction is ≥ 90%, assign a value of 10; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assigned value A1 according to the formula A1 = S × 10, where S is the satisfaction; S207. Evaluation of the fund execution rate: Calculate the difference between the percentage of fund appropriation and the percentage of project implementation progress. If the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 20; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 16; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 12; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 8; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 4; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0; Sum up all the assigned values in step S2, which is the health degree during the construction stage; S3. Build an evaluation model for the acceptance stage of non - engineering projects: S301. Evaluation of the clarity of project goals and plans: If there are project goals, assign a value of 2.5; if there are no project goals, assign a value of 0; if there are project plans, assign a value of 2.5; if there are no project plans, assign a value of 0; S302. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign a value of 5; if it is not clear, assign a value of 0; S303. Project progress evaluation: (1) Evaluation of the completion of bidding: Calculate the lag value Z1 of the bidding completion according to the formula Z1 = (T2 - T0) / T0, where T2 is the actual time on the reporting day; T0 is the planned time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 14; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 10; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 8; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 6; if it has been completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 5; (2) Evaluation of project implementation progress: Calculate the lag value Z2 of the project implementation progress according to the formula t1 = T2 × T3, Z2 = (T1 - t1) / T3 × 100%, where t1 is the planned completion time, T1 is the actual completion time, and T3 is the total project implementation time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 14; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 10; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 8; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 6; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 5; Sum up all the assigned values in step S303, which is the project progress evaluation result; S304. Project benefit evaluation: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 5; if materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 0; S305. Satisfaction evaluation: Based on the percentage satisfaction results of the general public and government departments, if the satisfaction ≥ 90%, assign a value of 5; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assigned value A1 according to the formula A1 = S×5, where S is the satisfaction; S306. Project technical acceptance evaluation: (1) Evaluation of the project effect review situation: Assign values according to the number of times of passing the review. Assign a value of 5 for passing once, a value of 3 for passing twice, and a value of 1 for the number of passing times ≥ 3; if no effect evaluation is required, the default assigned value is 5; (2) Evaluation of meeting the project completion requirements: If there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual assigned value A, A = M1 / M 总 ×10, where M1 is the actual completed quantity and M 总 is the planned total quantity; If there are multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual assigned value B, a = 10 / b, A n = M n / M 总 ×a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, and A n is the actual score value of each target, M n is the actual completed quantity of each target, and M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; Sum up all the assigned values in step S306, which is the project technical acceptance evaluation result; S307. Fund audit acceptance evaluation: Provide a third-party fund audit report, assign a value of 5; if no third-party fund audit report is provided, assign a value of 0; S308. Data integrity acceptance evaluation: (1) Provide project implementation plan or feasibility study report materials, assign a value of 2.5; if no project implementation plan or feasibility study report materials are provided, assign a value of 0; (2) Provide materials for the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage, assign a value of 2.5; if no materials for the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage are provided, assign a value of 0; Sum up all the assigned values in step S308, which is the data integrity acceptance evaluation result; S309. Acceptance process evaluation: Assign values according to the number of times of passing the expert review opinions on project achievements or project acceptance expert opinions. Assign a value of 5 for passing once, a value of 3 for passing twice, and a value of 1 for the number of passing times ≥ 3; if not provided, assign a value of 0; S310. Evaluation of the implementation rate of funds for acceptance: Calculate the difference between the fund implementation percentage and the progress percentage. If the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 10; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 8; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 6; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 4; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0. S311. Evaluation of hazardous waste management: Provide a management specification form for hazardous waste, assign a value of 3; if not provided, assign a value of 0. S312. Evaluation of inspection and monitoring situations: Provide a regular inspection form, assign a value of 3; if not provided, assign a value of 0. S313. Evaluation of public complaints: If there are public complaint opinions, assign a value of 0; if there are no public complaint opinions, assign a value of 3. S314. Evaluation of pollution incident occurrences: If there is a pollution incident, assign a value of 0; if there is no pollution incident, assign a value of 3. Sum up all the assigned results in step S3, which is the health degree at the project acceptance stage.

[0021] Example 2 For non - engineering projects with changes occurring during the construction stage, except for the following technical solutions, the evaluation method for the health degree of the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project in this example is the same as that in Example 1; Step S2 also includes constructing an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there is a change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 5; if there is no change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 0. Replace the evaluation of the project progress in step S203 (1) assessment of the completion of bidding and tendering with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 3; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 2. Replace the evaluation of the project progress in step S203 (1) assessment of the project implementation progress with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 0. Replace the satisfaction evaluation in step S206 with: According to the percentage - based satisfaction results of the public and government departments, if the satisfaction ≥ 90%, assign a value of 5; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assigned value A1 according to the formula A1 = S×5, where S is the satisfaction. Replace the evaluation of the fund execution rate in step S207 with: Calculate the difference between the fund appropriation percentage and the project implementation progress percentage. If the difference ≤ 5%, assign a value of 20; if 5% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 14; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 10; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0.

[0022] Example 3 For non-engineering projects with changes occurring during the project acceptance stage, the method for evaluating the health of the implementation process of this soil prevention and control project is the same as that of Example 1 except for the following technical solutions; Step S3 also includes constructing an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there is a change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 2; if there is no change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 0; Replace the evaluation of the project progress in S303 (1) assessment of the completion of bidding with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 1; Replace the evaluation of the project progress in S303 (2) assessment of the project implementation progress with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 1; Replace the evaluation of the acceptance fund execution rate in S310 with: Calculate the difference between the fund execution percentage and the progress percentage. If the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 8; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 6; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 4; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 2; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 1; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0.

[0023] Example 4 The method for evaluating the health of the implementation process of a certain engineering soil prevention and control project in this example is the same as that of Example 1 except for the following technical solutions; Step S203 also includes (3) effect evaluation: By default, assign a value of 10 if the effect evaluation is not required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign a value of 10; if not, assign a value of 0; Replace the evaluation of the project benefits in S205 with: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 10; Replace the evaluation assignment of the fund execution rate in step S207 with: when the difference ≤ 10%, assign 10; when 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign 8; when 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign 6; when 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign 4; when 70% < difference < 100%, assign 2; when the difference = 100%, assign 0; The rest of step S2 is the same; Replace step S3 with constructing an evaluation model for the acceptance stage of engineering projects; Step S303 also includes (3) Effect evaluation: By default, assign 5 if the effect evaluation is not required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign 5; if not, assign 0; Replace the project benefit evaluation in step S304 with: if no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign 3; Replace the evaluation of (1) Project effect review situation in the project technical acceptance evaluation of step 306 with: Assign according to the number of times of passing the review, assign 3 for passing once, assign 2 for passing twice, assign 1 for the number of passing times ≥ 3; if the effect evaluation is not required, by default assign 3; Replace the evaluation of (2) Evaluation of project completion requirements in the project technical acceptance evaluation of step 306 with: When there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual assignment A, A = M1 / M 总 ×7, where M1 is the actual completed quantity and M 总 is the planned total quantity; When there are multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual assignment B, a = 7 / b, A n = M n / M 总 ×a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, and A n is the actual score value of each target, M n is the actual completed quantity of each target, and M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; Replace the fund audit and acceptance evaluation in step S307 with: Provide a third-party fund audit report, assign 3; Replace the evaluation of the completeness of materials in step S308 with: (1) Provide project implementation plan or feasibility study report materials, assign 1.5; (2) Provide materials in the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage, assign 1.5; Replace the acceptance process evaluation in step S309 with: (1) Preliminary acceptance evaluation: Provide a preliminary acceptance opinion, assign 2; if not provided, assign 0; (2)Aging evaluation: Assign values according to the number of successful acceptance inspections. If the acceptance inspection is passed once, assign a value of 7; if it is passed twice, assign a value of 4; if the number of successful acceptance inspections is ≥3, assign a value of 3. If the acceptance inspection is not carried out on time, the total acceptance inspection time is 90 days, and scores are given according to the lag situation of the acceptance inspection. The lag value Z4 is calculated according to the formula: △t2 = T4 - T5, Z4 = (△t2 - 90) / 90×100%, where △t2 is the actual number of days for acceptance inspection, T4 is the actual acceptance inspection time, and T5 is the starting acceptance inspection time. (3)Evaluation of opinions on individual project acceptance: Provide the opinion form for individual project acceptance, assign a value of 2; if not provided, assign a value of 0. Sum up all the assigned values in step S309, and the result is the evaluation result of the acceptance process. The remaining steps are the same.

[0024] Example 5 This example is an engineering project with changes occurring during the construction stage and the acceptance stage. Except for the following technical solutions, the rest are the same as in Example 4. Step S2 also includes constructing an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there are change plans, change approvals, and expert review opinions on the change plans, assign a value of 5; if there are no change plans, change approvals, and expert review opinions on the change plans, assign a value of 0. The evaluation assignment for the completion of bidding in step S203(1) is replaced with: If the lag value ≤5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤70%, assign a value of 9; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 7; if completed but the lag ≥100%, assign a value of 5. The evaluation assignment for the project implementation progress in step S203(2) is replaced with: If the lag value ≤5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 0. Step S203 also includes (3) Effect evaluation: By default, assign a value of 10 if the effect evaluation is not required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign a value of 10; if not, assign a value of 0. Replace the project benefit evaluation in step S205 with: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 5. Replace the evaluation assignment of the fund execution rate in step S207 with: If the difference ≤5%, assign a value of 10; if 5% < difference ≤30%, assign a value of 7; if 30% < difference ≤50%, assign a value of 5; if 50% < difference ≤70%, assign a value of 3; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 1; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0. Step S3 also includes constructing an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there is a change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 2; if there is no change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 0. Replace the evaluation of the progress of Project S303 (1) assessment of the completion of bidding and tendering with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 7; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 5; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 3. Replace the evaluation of the progress of Project S303 (2) assessment of the project implementation progress with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 7; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 5; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 3. Replace the evaluation of the execution rate of the acceptance funds in S310 with: if the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 8; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 6; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 4; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 2; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 1; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0.

[0025] Example 6 This example is an engineering project with changes occurring during the construction stage and major changes occurring during the acceptance stage. Except for the following technical solutions, the rest are the same as in Example 5. Replace the evaluation of the progress of Project S303 with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 10; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 4; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 2. Replace the evaluation of the execution rate of the acceptance funds in S310 with: if the difference ≤ 5%, assign a value of 8; if 5% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 6; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 4; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 2; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 1; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0.

[0026] Example 7 The health degree evaluation method for the implementation process of a soil prevention and control project in a certain non - engineering area without changes uses the following formula to calculate the health degree of the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project in this area: where n is the number of projects already completed in this area, m is the total number of projects that need to be done in this area, V i is the government - supported fund amount for each project, and H iFor each project, the health degree calculated according to the health degree evaluation method of the soil prevention and control project in Example 1, and W is the health degree of the soil prevention and control project implementation process in this region.

[0027] Example 8 A pilot project on the application of agricultural land soil risk control technology in a cadmium and arsenic high-background value area in a certain county of Yunnan. It belongs to an engineering project and has not changed. The health degree is evaluated using the method of the present invention, and the health degree value is 81, and the health degree level is good. See Table 1 for details; Table 1 Health Degree Evaluation Results at the Project Acceptance Stage 。

[0028] Example 9 A project on the remediation of heavy metal-polluted agricultural land in a certain village in Kunming. It belongs to an engineering project and has not changed. The health degree is evaluated using the method of the present invention, and the health degree value is 75, and the health degree level is average. See Table 2 for details; Table 2 Health Degree Evaluation Results at the Project Acceptance Stage 。

[0029] Example 10 A demonstration project on the remediation of heavy metal-polluted farmland soil in a certain district of Kunming. It belongs to an engineering project and has not changed. The health degree is evaluated using the method of the present invention, and the health degree value is 77, and the health degree level is average. See Table 3 for details; Table 3 Health Degree Evaluation Results at the Project Acceptance Stage 。

[0030] Example 11 A project on the investigation of the soil environment of cultivated land in a certain town area of Kunming. It belongs to a non-engineering project and has changed. The health degree is evaluated using the method of the present invention, and the health degree value is 90, and the health degree level is good. See Table 4 for details; Table 4 Health Degree Evaluation Results at the Project Implementation Stage 。

[0031] Example 12 A pilot project on the application of soil remediation technology for a polluted site of a certain company in Kunming (Phase I). It belongs to an engineering project and has not changed. The health degree is evaluated using the method of the present invention, and the health degree value is 77, and the health degree level is average. See Table 5 for details; Table 5 Health Degree Evaluation Results at the Project Acceptance Stage 。

[0032] Example 13 The soil pollution remediation project (phase II) of a certain town belongs to the engineering project category and has not changed; the health degree is evaluated by the method of the present invention, the health degree value is 78, and the health degree level is general; see Table 6 for details; Table 6 Health degree evaluation results at the project acceptance stage 。

[0033] Example 14 The pilot project for the application of soil pollution remediation technology in the original site of a certain company belongs to the engineering project category and has not changed; the health degree is evaluated by the method of the present invention, the health degree value is 72, and the health degree level is general; see Table 7 for details; Table 7 Health degree evaluation results at the project acceptance stage 。

[0034] Example 15 The environmental investigation and risk assessment project of the historical heavy metal polluted site of a certain company in Luliang, Yunnan belongs to the non-engineering project category and has not changed; the health degree is evaluated by the method of the present invention, the health degree value is 80, and the health degree level is general; see Table 8 for details; Table 8 Health degree evaluation results at the project acceptance stage 。

[0035] Example 16 The soil pollution remediation project of the cultivated land around a certain company in Luliang belongs to the engineering project category and has not changed; the health degree is evaluated by the method of the present invention, the health degree value is 88, and the health degree level is good; see Table 9 for details; Table 9 Health degree evaluation results at the project acceptance stage 。

[0036] Example 17 The environmental investigation and risk assessment project of the site of the legacy waste residue heap area of indigenous zinc smelting in a certain city belongs to the non-engineering project category and has not changed; the health degree is evaluated by the method of the present invention, the health degree value is 89, and the health degree level is good; see Table 10 for details; Table 10 Health degree evaluation results at the project acceptance stage 。

[0037] Example 18 In order to effectively verify the evaluation method of the present invention, a total of 16 soil pollution prevention and control projects in various prefectures and cities of Yunnan Province were selected as cases, including 10 engineering projects and 6 non-engineering projects. The health degree evaluations were carried out at the acceptance stage respectively, and the results are shown in Table 11; through practical applications, the evaluation index system and scoring criteria established by the invention were verified to prove its scientificity and feasibility; Health Assessment Results at the Project Acceptance Stage in Table 11 。

[0038] Verified by actual cases, the results show that the health assessment scores present a normal distribution, indicating that the assessment results are reasonable; at the same time, it also shows that the evaluation index system and scoring criteria established in the present invention are scientific and feasible, and can comprehensively and objectively evaluate the health status of the project. Moreover, the evaluation index system can also provide a reference basis for the improvement and optimization of the project.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the health degree of the implementation process of a soil prevention and control project, characterized in that It includes the following steps: S1. Build an evaluation model for the bidding stage: S101. Evaluation of the clarity of project objectives and plans: If there are both project objectives and project plans, assign a value of 15; if there are no project objectives or project plans, assign a value of 0; S102. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign a value of 15; if it is not clear, assign a value of 0; S103. Project progress evaluation: (1) Evaluation of the bidding preparation stage: Calculate the lag value Z1 of the bidding preparation stage according to the formula, △t1 = T2 - T0 - 30, Z1 = (△t1 - 60) / 60×100%, where △t1 is the actual preparation time, T2 is the time of reporting on the current day; T0 is the time of fund allocation; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign a value of 0; (2) Evaluation of the ongoing bidding stage: If the bidding preparation stage proceeds normally, calculate the lag value Z2 according to the formula, △t2 = T2 - T3 - (60 - △t1), Z2 = (△t2 - 30) / 30×100%, where △t2 is the actual bidding time; T2 is the time of reporting on the current day; T3 is the time of the bidding announcement, △t1 is the actual preparation time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign a value of 0; If there is a lag in the bidding preparation stage, calculate the lag value Z3 according to the formula, △t3 = T2 - T3 + (△t1 - 60), Z3 = (△t3 - 30) / 30×100%, where △t3 is the actual bidding time; T2 is the time of reporting on the current day; T3 is the time of the bidding announcement; △t1 is the actual preparation time, Z3 is the lag value, △t3 is the actual bidding time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 70; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 60; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 50; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 40; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 30; if the lag value ≥ 100%, assign a value of 0; Take the average of the evaluation assignment in the bidding preparation stage and the evaluation assignment in the ongoing bidding stage as the project progress evaluation result; S104. Sum up all the assignment results in step S1 as the health degree of the bidding stage; S2. Build an evaluation model for the non - engineering construction stage: S201. Evaluation of the clarity of project objectives and plans: If there are project objectives, assign a value of 5, if there are no project objectives, assign a value of 0; if there are project plans, assign a value of 5, if there are no project plans, assign a value of 0; S202. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign a value of 5; if it is not clear, assign a value of 0; S203. Project progress evaluation: (1)Evaluation of the completion status of bidding: Calculate the lag value Z1 of the bidding completion status according to the formula Z1 = (T2 - T0) / T0, where T2 is the actual time on the reporting day; T0 is the planned time; when the lag value ≤ 10%, assign 15; when 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 13; when 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 11; when 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 9; when 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 7; when completed but lag ≥ 100%, assign 5; (2)Evaluation of the project implementation progress: Calculate the lag value Z2 of the project implementation progress according to the formula t1 = T2 × T3, Z2 = (T4 - t1) / T3 × 100%, where t1 is the planned progress time; T2 is the reported progress; T3 is the total project implementation time; T4 is the actual progress time; when the lag value ≤ 10%, assign 15; when 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 12; when 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 9; when 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 6; when 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 3; when the lag value = 100%, assign 0; Sum up all the assignment results of S203, which is the evaluation result of the project progress; S204. Evaluation of the project quantity; If there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual assignment A, where A = M1 / M 总 × 20, M1 is the actual completed quantity, and M 总 is the planned total quantity; If there are only multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual assignment B, a = 20 / b, A n = M n / M 总 ×a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, and A n is the actual score value of each target, M n is the actual completed quantity of each target, and M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; S205. Evaluation of the project benefits; If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign 5; if materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign 0; S206. Evaluation of satisfaction; According to the satisfaction results of the public and government departments on a percentage basis, if the satisfaction ≥ 90%, assign 10; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assignment A1 according to the formula A1 = S × 10, where S is the satisfaction; S207. Evaluation of the fund execution rate; Calculate the difference between the fund appropriation percentage and the project implementation progress percentage. When the difference ≤ 10%, assign 20; when 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign 16; when 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign 12; when 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign 8; when 70% < difference < 100%, assign 4; when the difference = 100%, assign 0; Sum up all the assignment results of step S2, which is the health degree of the construction stage; S3. Build an evaluation model for the acceptance stage of non - engineering projects: S301. Evaluation of the clarity of project objectives and plans: If there are project objectives, assign 2.5; if there are no project objectives, assign 0; if there are project plans, assign 2.5; if there are no project plans, assign 0; S302. Evaluation of the integrity of project scope definition: If the project scope is clear, assign 5; if not, assign 0; S303. Evaluation of project progress: (1)Evaluation of the completion status of bidding: Calculate the lag value Z1 of the bidding completion status according to the formula Z1 = (T2 - T0) / T0, where T2 is the actual time on the reporting day; T0 is the planned time; when the lag value ≤ 10%, assign 14; when 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 12; when 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 10; when 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 8; when 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 6; when completed but lag ≥ 100%, assign 5; (2)Project implementation progress evaluation: Calculate the lag value Z2 of the project implementation progress according to the formula, t1 = T2×T3, Z2 = (T1 - t1) / T3×100%, where t1 is the planned completion time, T1 is the actual completion time, and T3 is the total project implementation time; if the lag value ≤ 10%, assign a value of 14; if 10% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 10; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 8; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 6; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 5; Sum up all the assignment results in step S303, which is the evaluation result of the project progress; S304. Project benefit evaluation: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 5; if materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign a value of 0; S305. Satisfaction evaluation: According to the percentage-based satisfaction results of the public and government departments, if the satisfaction ≥ 90%, assign a value of 5; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assignment A1 according to the formula, A1 = S×5, where S is the satisfaction; S306. Project technical acceptance evaluation: (1)Evaluation of the project effect review situation: Assign values according to the number of times of passing the review. Assign a value of 5 for passing once, a value of 3 for passing twice, and a value of 1 for the number of passing times ≥ 3; if no effect evaluation is required, default to assign a value of 5; (2)Evaluate the project completion requirements: If there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual assignment A, where A = M1 / M 总 × 10, M1 is the actual completed quantity, and M 总 is the planned total quantity; If there are only multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual assignment B, a = 10 / b, A n = M n / M 总 ×a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, A n is the actual score of each target, M n is the actual completion quantity of each target, M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; Sum up all the assignment results in step S306, which is the evaluation result of the project technical acceptance; S307. Capital audit acceptance evaluation: Provide a third-party capital audit report, assign a value of 5; if no third-party capital audit report is provided, assign a value of 0; S308. Evaluation of the completeness of materials acceptance: (1)If the project implementation plan or feasibility study report materials are provided, assign a value of 2.5; if the project implementation plan or feasibility study report materials are not provided, assign a value of 0; (2)If the materials in the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage are provided, assign a value of 2.5; if the materials in the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage are not provided, assign a value of 0; Sum up all the assignment results in step S308, which is the evaluation result of the completeness of materials acceptance; S309. Evaluation of the acceptance process: Assign values according to the number of times of passing the expert review opinions of the project results or the expert opinions of the project acceptance. Assign a value of 5 for passing once, a value of 3 for passing twice, and a value of 1 for the number of passing times ≥ 3; if not provided, assign a value of 0; S310. Evaluation of the acceptance fund execution rate: Calculate the difference between the fund execution percentage and the progress percentage. If the difference ≤ 10%, assign a value of 10; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 8; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 6; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 4; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0; S311. Hazardous waste management evaluation: Provide a management specification form for hazardous waste, assign a value of 3; if no management specification form for hazardous waste is provided, assign a value of 0; S312. Evaluation of the inspection and monitoring situation: Provide a regular inspection form, assign a value of 3; if no regular inspection form is provided, assign a value of 0; S313. Evaluation of the public complaint situation: If there are public complaint opinions, assign a value of 0; if there are no public complaint opinions, assign a value of 3; S314. Evaluation of pollution incident occurrence: If a pollution incident occurs, assign a value of 0; if no pollution incident occurs, assign a value of 3. Sum up all the assigned results in step S3, which is the health degree at the project acceptance stage.

2. The health evaluation method for the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project according to claim 1, wherein If 90 < health degree ≤ 100, the health degree is excellent; if 80 < health degree ≤ 90, the health degree is good. If 70 < health degree ≤ 80, the health degree is average. If 60 < health degree ≤ 70, the health degree is poor; if health degree ≤ 60, the health degree is very poor.

3. The health evaluation method for the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project according to claim 1, wherein If a change occurs during the construction stage, step S2 also includes constructing an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there is a change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 5; if there is no change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 0. Replace the evaluation of the completion of bidding in the project progress evaluation (1) of step S203 with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 12; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 3; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 2. Replace the evaluation of the project implementation progress in the project progress evaluation (1) of step S203 with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 15; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the lag value = 100%, assign a value of 0. Replace the satisfaction evaluation in step S206 with: According to the satisfaction results of the public and government departments on a percentage basis, if the satisfaction ≥ 90%, assign a value of 5; if the satisfaction < 90%, calculate the actual assigned value A1 according to the formula, A1 = S × 5, where S is the satisfaction. Replace the evaluation of the fund execution rate in step S207 with: Calculate the difference between the percentage of fund appropriation and the percentage of project implementation progress. If the difference ≤ 5%, assign a value of 20; if 5% < difference ≤ 30%, assign a value of 14; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign a value of 10; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign a value of 6; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign a value of 2; if the difference = 100%, assign a value of 0.

4. The health degree evaluation method for the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project according to claim 1, characterized in that If a change occurs during the project acceptance stage, step S3 also includes constructing an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there is a change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 2; if there is no change plan, change approval, and expert review opinions on the change plan, assign a value of 0. Replace the evaluation of the completion of bidding in S303 project progress evaluation (1) with: If the lag value ≤ 5%, assign a value of 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign a value of 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign a value of 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign a value of 5; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign a value of 2; if completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign a value of 1. Replace the progress evaluation of Project S303 (2) Project implementation progress evaluation with: lag value ≤ 5%, assign 14; 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 11; 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 8; 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 5; 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 2; lag value = 100%, assign 1; Replace the evaluation of the acceptance fund execution rate of S310 with: calculate the difference between the fund execution percentage and the progress percentage. If the difference ≤ 10%, assign 8; 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign 6; 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign 4; 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign 2; 70% < difference < 100%, assign 1; difference = 100%, assign 0.

5. The health evaluation method for the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project according to claim 1, wherein Replace step S2 with constructing an evaluation model for the construction stage of engineering projects; Step S203 also includes (3) Effect evaluation: By default, assign 10 if no effect evaluation is required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign 10; if not, assign 0; Replace the project benefit evaluation of S205 with: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign 10; Replace the assignment of the fund execution rate evaluation in step S207 with: If the difference ≤ 10%, assign 10; 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign 8; 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign 6; 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign 4; 70% < difference < 100%, assign 2; difference = 100%, assign 0; The rest of step S2 remains the same; Replace step S3 with constructing an evaluation model for the acceptance stage of engineering projects; Step S303 also includes (3) Effect evaluation: By default, assign 5 if no effect evaluation is required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign 5; if not, assign 0; Replace the project benefit evaluation of step S304 with: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign 3; Replace the evaluation of the project effect review situation in the project technical acceptance evaluation (1) of step 306 with: Assign according to the number of times of passing the review. Assign 3 for passing once, assign 2 for passing twice, assign 1 if the number of passing times ≥ 3; if no effect evaluation is required, by default assign 3; Replace the evaluation of the project completion requirements in the project technical acceptance evaluation (2) of step 306 with: When there is only one quantity target, calculate the actual assignment A, where A = M1 / M 总 ×7, M1 is the actual completed quantity, and M 总 is the planned total quantity; If there are only multiple quantity targets, calculate the actual assignment B, a = 7 / b, A n = M n / M 总 ×a, B = A1 + A2 + …… + A n , where a is the average score value of each target, b is the number of targets, and A n is the actual score of each target, M n is the actual completion quantity of each target, M 总 is the planned total quantity of each target; Replace the fund audit acceptance evaluation of step S307 with: Provide a third-party fund audit report, assign 3; Replace the evaluation of the data integrity acceptance of step S308 with: (1) Provide the project implementation plan or feasibility study report data, assign 1.5; (2) Provide the data of the project bidding stage, project implementation stage, and effect evaluation stage, assign 1.5; Replace the acceptance process evaluation of step S309 with: (1) Preliminary acceptance evaluation: Provide a preliminary acceptance opinion, assign 2; if not provided, assign 0; (2) Aging evaluation: Assign values according to the number of successful acceptance inspections. For one successful acceptance inspection, assign 7; for two successful acceptance inspections, assign 4; for three or more successful acceptance inspections, assign 3. If the acceptance inspection is not carried out on time, the total acceptance time is 90 days, and points are given according to the delay situation of the acceptance inspection. The delay value Z4 is calculated according to the formula: △t2 = T4 - T5, Z4 = (△t2 - 90) / 90×100%, where △t2 is the actual acceptance days, T4 is the actual acceptance time, and T5 is the starting acceptance time. (3) Evaluation of the opinions on the acceptance of individual projects: Provide the opinion form for the acceptance of individual projects, assign 2; if not provided, assign 0. Sum up all the assigned results in step S309, and the result is the evaluation result of the acceptance process. The remaining steps are the same.

6. The health evaluation method for the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project according to claim 5, wherein If there are changes during the construction stage of engineering projects, step S2 also includes building an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there are change plans, change approvals, and expert review opinions on the change plans, assign 5; if there are no change plans, change approvals, and expert review opinions on the change plans, assign 0. The evaluation assignment for the completion of bidding in step S203(1) is replaced with: If the delay value ≤ 5%, assign 15; if 5% < delay value ≤ 30%, assign 12; if 30% < delay value ≤ 50%, assign 9; if 50% < delay value ≤ 70%, assign 9; if 70% < delay value < 100%, assign 7; if completed but the delay ≥ 100%, assign 5. The evaluation assignment for the project implementation progress in step S203(2) is replaced with: If the delay value ≤ 5%, assign 15; if 5% < delay value ≤ 30%, assign 11; if 30% < delay value ≤ 50%, assign 8; if 50% < delay value ≤ 70%, assign 5; if 70% < delay value < 100%, assign 2; if the delay value = 100%, assign 0. Step S203 also includes (3) Effect evaluation: By default, assign 10 if the effect evaluation is not required; if the project effect evaluation work is completed and there are expert effect review opinions, assign 10; if not, assign 0. Replace the project benefit evaluation in step S205 with: If no materials related to negative impacts are provided, assign 5. Replace the evaluation assignment of the fund execution rate in step S207 with: If the difference ≤ 5%, assign 10; if 5% < difference ≤ 30%, assign 7; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign 5; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign 3; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign 1; if the difference = 100%, assign 0. If there are changes during the acceptance stage of engineering projects, step S3 also includes building an evaluation model for the implementation of project changes: If there are change plans, change approvals, and expert review opinions on the change plans, assign 2; if there are no change plans, change approvals, and expert review opinions on the change plans, assign 0. Replace the evaluation of the completion of bidding in the project progress evaluation (1) in step S303 with: If the delay value ≤ 5%, assign 14; if 5% < delay value ≤ 30%, assign 11; if 30% < delay value ≤ 50%, assign 9; if 50% < delay value ≤ 70%, assign 7; if 70% < delay value < 100%, assign 5; if completed but the delay ≥ 100%, assign 3. Replace the evaluation of the progress of Project S303 (2) with the evaluation of the implementation progress: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 11; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 9; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 7; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 5; if the lag value = 100%, assign 3; Replace the evaluation of the execution rate of the acceptance funds of S310 with: if the difference ≤ 10%, assign 8; if 10% < difference ≤ 30%, assign 6; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign 4; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign 2; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign 1; if the difference = 100%, assign 0; The remaining steps are the same.

7. The health evaluation method for the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project according to claim 6, wherein If a change occurs during the acceptance stage of an engineering project and it becomes a major change, replace the evaluation of the progress of Project S303 with: if the lag value ≤ 5%, assign 14; if 5% < lag value ≤ 30%, assign 10; if 30% < lag value ≤ 50%, assign 8; if 50% < lag value ≤ 70%, assign 6; if 70% < lag value < 100%, assign 4; if it is completed but the lag ≥ 100%, assign 2; Replace the evaluation of the execution rate of the acceptance funds of S310 with: if the difference ≤ 5%, assign 8; if 5% < difference ≤ 30%, assign 6; if 30% < difference ≤ 50%, assign 4; if 50% < difference ≤ 70%, assign 2; if 70% < difference < 100%, assign 1; if the difference = 100%, assign 0.

8. A method for evaluating the health degree in the implementation process of a regional soil control project, characterized in that Use the following formula to calculate the health of the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project in this area: Among them, n is the number of projects already done in this area, m is the total number of projects to be done in this area, V i is the government support fund amount for each project, H i is the health degree calculated for each project according to the health degree evaluation method for the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project described in any one of claims 1 to 7, and W is the health degree of the implementation process of the soil prevention and control project in this area.

9. The health evaluation method for the implementation process of the regional soil prevention and control project according to claim 8, characterized in that If 90 < health ≤ 100, the health is excellent; if 80 < health ≤ 90, the health is good; If 70 < health ≤ 80, the health is average; If 60 < health ≤ 70, the health is poor; if health ≤ 60, the health is very poor.

Images