Management scoring result determination method, system and equipment

Abstract

The invention discloses a method, a system and equipment for determining a management scoring result, relates to the technical field of system construction, and aims to solve the problem of high management difficulty of system management industrial assets required by asset integrity management. The management scoring result determination method comprises the following steps: performing dimension reduction processing on a system required by asset integrity management to obtain a two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management; and based on the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management, processing the information of the to-be-managed industrial assets to obtain a management scoring result of the to-be-managed industrial assets.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of institutional system construction, and in particular to a method, system and equipment for determining management scoring results. Background Art

[0002] Asset integrity management (AIM) systems are a management system that ensures the safe, reliable, and economical operation of industrial assets throughout their lifecycle. These systems are now widely used in industries such as oil and gas, chemicals, power generation, manufacturing, and transportation. AIM systems play a key role in daily equipment operation and maintenance, risk management, asset detection, failure prediction, and compliance reviews.

[0003] Currently, the AIM system is structured in three dimensions, categorized by lifecycle, asset type, and business type. While comprehensive, its complexity also presents significant challenges in managing industrial assets through the AIM system. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The purpose of this application is to provide a method, system and device for determining management scoring results, aiming to solve the problem of high difficulty in managing industrial assets under the system management required by AIM.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, this application adopts the following technical solutions:

[0006] In the first aspect, the present application provides a method for determining a management scoring result, including: performing dimensionality reduction processing on the system required for asset integrity management to obtain a two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management; based on the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management, processing the information of the industrial assets to be managed to obtain a management scoring result of the industrial assets to be managed.

[0007] The above technical solution brings at least the following beneficial effects: by reducing the dimensionality of the system required for asset integrity management, a two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management is obtained, wherein the structure of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management is simpler than the structure of the three-dimensional asset integrity management, and it is easier to understand and manage the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management, thereby reducing the difficulty of managing industrial assets through the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0008] In one possible implementation, the systems required for asset integrity management are subjected to dimensionality reduction processing to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management, including: supplementing the initial two-dimensional matrix based on industrial asset information and business information to obtain the two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0009] In one possible implementation, the initial two-dimensional matrix is supplemented based on the information of industrial assets and business information to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management, including: filling the information of industrial assets and business information into the horizontal axis and vertical axis of the initial two-dimensional matrix respectively; determining the corresponding elements in the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the system required for asset integrity management to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0010] In one possible implementation, the initial two-dimensional matrix is supplemented based on the information of industrial assets and business information to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management, including: supplementing the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the information of industrial assets and business information to obtain an intermediate two-dimensional matrix; optimizing the intermediate two-dimensional matrix to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0011] In one possible implementation, the intermediate two-dimensional matrix is optimized, including: if the intermediate two-dimensional matrix lacks a first element, obtaining a new system and determining the missing first element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix based on the new system; if the intermediate two-dimensional matrix includes multiple repeated second elements, adding a third element to the intermediate two-dimensional matrix and deleting the multiple repeated second elements, wherein the third element is obtained by merging the multiple repeated second elements; if the adaptation range of the fourth element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix is greater than or equal to a first threshold, refining the system into multiple systems and filling the multiple systems with corresponding elements.

[0012] In one possible implementation, the effectiveness and feasibility of a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management is verified.

[0013] In one possible implementation, the effectiveness and feasibility of the obtained two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management are verified, including: using historical data to test the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management to obtain simulation test results, and comparing the simulation test results with actual results to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0014] In the second aspect, the present application provides a management scoring result determination device, which includes: a determination unit; a determination unit, which is used to perform dimensionality reduction processing on the asset integrity management standard system to obtain a two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management; the determination unit is also used to process the information of the industrial assets to be managed based on the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management to obtain the management scoring result of the industrial assets to be managed.

[0015] In a possible implementation, the determination unit is further configured to supplement the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the industrial asset information and the business information to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0016] In one possible implementation, the determination unit is specifically used to: fill the industrial asset information and business information into the horizontal axis and vertical axis of the initial two-dimensional matrix respectively; determine the corresponding elements in the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the system required for asset integrity management, and obtain the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0017] In a possible implementation, the determination unit is specifically configured to: supplement the initial two-dimensional matrix based on industrial asset information and business information to obtain an intermediate two-dimensional matrix; and optimize the intermediate two-dimensional matrix to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0018] In one possible implementation, the device also includes: an acquisition unit; if the intermediate two-dimensional matrix lacks a first element, the acquisition unit is used to acquire a new system; a determination unit is also used to determine the missing first element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix based on the new system; if the intermediate two-dimensional matrix includes multiple repeated second elements, the determination unit is also used to add a third element to the intermediate two-dimensional matrix; the determination unit is also used to delete multiple repeated second elements, wherein the third element is obtained by merging multiple repeated second elements; if the adaptation range of the fourth element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix is greater than or equal to the first threshold, the determination unit is also used to refine the system into multiple systems; the determination unit is also used to fill the multiple systems into corresponding elements.

[0019] In a possible implementation, the determination unit is further configured to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0020] In a possible implementation, the determination unit is further configured to test the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management using historical data to obtain simulation test results, and compare the simulation test results with actual results to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0021] In a third aspect, the present application provides another device for determining a management score result, the device comprising: a processor and a communication interface; the communication interface and the processor are coupled, and the processor is configured to run a computer program or instructions to implement the device for determining a management score result as described in the first aspect and any possible implementation of the first aspect.

[0022] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, which stores instructions. When the instructions are executed on a terminal, the terminal executes the management score result determination method described in the first aspect and any possible implementation of the first aspect.

[0023] In a fifth aspect, the present application provides a computer program product comprising instructions. When the computer program product is run on a management score result determination device, the management score result determination device performs the management score result determination method as described in the first aspect and any possible implementation manner of the first aspect.

[0024] In a sixth aspect, the present application provides a chip, which includes a processor and a communication interface, the communication interface and the processor are coupled, and the processor is used to run a computer program or instructions to implement the management score result determination method described in the first aspect and any possible implementation of the first aspect.

[0025] Specifically, the chip provided in this application also includes a memory for storing computer programs or instructions. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0026] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without any creative work.

[0027] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the structure of a device for determining a management score result provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0028] Figure 2 A flow chart of a method for determining a management scoring result provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0029] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the dimensions of asset integrity management provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0030] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the structure of another device for determining a management score result provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0031] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of this application to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application. Obviously, the embodiments described are only part of the embodiments of this application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0032] In the description of this application, it should be understood that the terms "upper," "lower," "left," "right," "front," "back," "inner," "outer," and the like, indicating directions or positional relationships, are based on the directions or relative positional relationships shown in the accompanying drawings and are intended solely to facilitate the description of this application and simplify the description. They do not indicate or imply that the devices or components referred to must have a specific direction, be constructed, or operate in a specific direction. Therefore, they should not be construed as limitations on this application. Unless otherwise specified, the above-mentioned directionality descriptions may be flexibly set in actual application, provided that the relative positional relationships shown in the accompanying drawings are met.

[0033] The terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of the technical features being referred to. Thus, a feature specified as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of such features. Throughout this application, unless otherwise specified, "plurality" means two or more.

[0034] Asset integrity management (AIM) systems are a management system that ensures the safe, reliable, and economical operation of industrial assets throughout their lifecycle. These systems are now widely used in industries such as oil and gas, chemicals, power generation, manufacturing, and transportation. AIM systems play a key role in daily equipment operation and maintenance, risk management, asset detection, failure prediction, and compliance reviews.

[0035] Currently, the AIM system can be structured in three dimensions, categorized by lifecycle, asset class, and business type. While this three-dimensional structure is comprehensive, its complexity also creates significant management challenges.

[0036] The AIM system is a crucial management framework for ensuring the safe, reliable, and economical operation of industrial assets throughout their lifecycle. It covers all stages of industrial asset development, from design and construction to operation and retirement, encompassing a wide range of asset types and business types. However, as the number and variety of industrial assets increase, traditional AIM systems have adopted a complex three-dimensional structure, categorized by lifecycle, asset type, and business type. While comprehensive, this three-dimensional structure presents challenges in practical application, including high structural complexity, inadequate and redundant system coverage, and poor applicability. The three-dimensional structure of AIM systems contributes to their structural complexity, making them difficult to understand and apply.

[0037] Currently, existing technologies propose a method for optimizing the systems required for device-related AIMs. This method compares the number of device-related system items with the number of valid system items to optimize the systems required for device-related AIMs. Other technologies focus on the construction of AIM systems. Still others optimize and analyze AIM systems through Hall 3D structural modeling or through research, organization, and analysis. Therefore, there is still a lack of an effective method that can systematically optimize AIM systems, simplify their structure, and thus improve management efficiency.

[0038] In view of this, in an embodiment of the present application, a two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management is obtained by performing dimensionality reduction processing on the systems required for asset integrity management, wherein the structure of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management is simpler than the structure of the three-dimensional asset integrity management, and it is easier to understand and manage the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management, thereby reducing the difficulty of managing industrial assets using the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0039] In the description of this application, it should be noted that, unless otherwise expressly specified or limited, the terms "mounted," "connected," "connected," and "connected" should be understood broadly. For example, they may refer to fixed connections, detachable connections, or integral connections. They may be directly connected, indirectly connected through an intermediary, or internally connected between two components. Those skilled in the art will understand the specific meanings of these terms in this application based on the specific circumstances.

[0040] In the embodiments of the present application, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variations thereof are intended to encompass non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, article, or device comprising a series of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not explicitly listed, or elements inherent to such process, article, or device. In the absence of further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprising a ..." does not preclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, article, or device comprising the element.

[0041] In the embodiments of this application, words such as "exemplary" or "for example" are used to indicate examples, illustrations, or descriptions. Any embodiment or design described as "exemplary" or "for example" in the embodiments of this application should not be interpreted as being preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs. Rather, the use of words such as "exemplary" or "for example" is intended to present the relevant concepts in a concrete manner.

[0042] In the description of this specification, specific features, structures, materials or characteristics may be combined in an appropriate manner in any one or more embodiments or examples.

[0043] The above are only specific embodiments of the present application, but the scope of protection of this application is not limited thereto. Any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by a person skilled in the art within the technical scope disclosed in this application should be included in the scope of protection of this application. Therefore, the scope of protection of this application should be based on the scope of protection of the claims.

[0044] Figure 1 This is a structural diagram of a management score result determination device 10 provided in an embodiment of the present application. Figure 1 As shown, the management score result determination device 10 may include a processor 101 , a bus 102 , a communication interface 103 , and a memory 104 .

[0045] Furthermore, the management score result determination device 10 may further include a communication interface 103 and a memory 104 . The processor 101 , the memory 104 and the communication interface 103 may be connected via a bus 102 .

[0046] The processor 101 is a CPU, a general-purpose processor, a network processor (NP), a digital signal processor (DSP), a microprocessor, a microcontroller, a programmable logic device (PLD), or any combination thereof. The processor 101 may also be other devices with processing functions, such as circuits, devices, or software modules, without limitation.

[0047] The bus 102 is used to transmit information between the components included in the management score result determination device 10 .

[0048] Communication interface 103 is used to communicate with other devices or other communication networks. Such other communication networks may be Ethernet, radio access networks (RAN), wireless local area networks (WLAN), etc. Communication interface 103 may be a module, circuit, communication interface, or any other device capable of implementing communication.

[0049] The memory 104 is used to store instructions, where the instructions may be computer programs.

[0050] The memory 104 may be a read-only memory (ROM) or other type of static storage device that can store static information and / or instructions, or a random access memory (RAM) or other type of dynamic storage device that can store information and / or instructions, or an electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), a compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM) or other optical disc storage, optical disc storage (including compact disc, laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc, Blu-ray disc, etc.), magnetic disk storage media or other magnetic storage devices, etc., without limitation.

[0051] It should be noted that the memory 104 can exist independently of the processor 101 or can be integrated with the processor 101. The memory 104 can be used to store instructions, program code, or some data. The memory 104 can be located within the management score result determination device 10 or outside the management score result determination device 10, without limitation. The processor 101 is used to execute the instructions stored in the memory 104 to implement the blind detection method provided in the following embodiments of this application.

[0052] In one example, the processor 101 may include one or more CPUs.

[0053] As an optional implementation, the management score result determination device 10 includes multiple processors.

[0054] As an optional implementation, the management score result determination device 10 further includes an output device and an input device, which are not shown in the figure.

[0055] In the embodiment of the present application, the chip system can be composed of chips, or can include chips and other discrete devices.

[0056] In addition, the actions and terms involved in the various embodiments of this application can refer to each other without limitation. The message names or parameter names in the messages exchanged between the various devices in the embodiments of this application are only examples, and other names can also be used in specific implementations without limitation.

[0057] The following combination Figure 1The management score result determination device shown describes the management score result determination method provided in the embodiment of the present application. Among them, the actions, terms, etc. involved in the various embodiments of the present application can refer to each other without limitation. The message name or parameter name in the message exchanged between the various devices in the embodiment of the present application is only an example, and other names can also be used in the specific implementation without limitation. The actions involved in the various embodiments of the present application are only an example, and other names can also be used in the specific implementation, such as: "included in" in the embodiment of the present application can also be replaced by "carried on" or "carried in", etc.

[0058] like Figure 2 As shown, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for determining a management scoring result, which includes: S201 and S202.

[0059] S201. The electronic device performs dimensionality reduction processing on the system required for asset integrity management to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0060] Optionally, the electronic device can determine the three-dimensional structure of the system required for asset integrity management (hereinafter referred to as AIM) based on the information of the industrial assets to be managed. Specifically, the electronic device classifies the information of the industrial assets to be managed and structures the information of the industrial assets to be managed based on three types of information: industrial asset stage information (e.g., also referred to as lifecycle information), asset object information, and business information. The three-dimensional structure of the system required for AIM represents the above three types of information (i.e., industrial asset stage information, asset object information, and business information).

[0061] Further, optionally, the electronic device can generate a three-dimensional structure of the system required by AIM through the above step of determining the three-dimensional structure of the system required by AIM. Figure 3 As shown, an embodiment of the present application provides a dimensional diagram of asset integrity management. Specifically, industrial asset phase information includes construction, operation, and retirement periods; asset object information includes pipelines, oil and gas stations, liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminals, underground gas storage, and submarine pipelines; and business information includes data management, system platforms, high-consequence areas, risk assessment, integrity assessment, repair and maintenance, failure management, and performance evaluation.

[0062] The following is a detailed description of the phase information of industrial assets:

[0063] Optionally, industrial asset phase information can be divided into construction, operation, and decommissioning phases based on the phases the industrial asset has experienced. Construction phase policies may include various safety management systems, quality management systems, and environmental management systems for the design, construction, and installation phases of the industrial asset. Operation phase policies may include various management systems for daily operations, such as industrial asset monitoring, maintenance, repair, and fault diagnosis. Decommissioning standards may include relevant systems for industrial asset decommissioning, dismantling, and recycling.

[0064] The following is a detailed description of the asset object information:

[0065] Optionally, the information of the asset object can be divided according to the type and characteristics of the industrial asset. The information of the asset object may include pipeline lines, oil and gas stations, LNG receiving stations, underground gas storages, marine pipelines, and information of other asset objects (e.g., special equipment). Among them, pipeline lines may include natural gas pipelines, oil pipelines, and other pipeline lines (e.g., tap water pipelines). Oil and gas stations may include oil field stations and gas field stations. LNG receiving stations may include liquefied natural gas receiving and storage facilities. Underground gas storages may include underground facilities for natural gas storage. Marine pipelines may include submarine natural gas pipelines, marine oil pipelines, and other marine pipelines (e.g., hydrogen pipelines), which are not limited in the embodiments of the present application.

[0066] The following is a detailed description of the business information:

[0067] Optionally, business information can be divided according to the different business areas involved in the information of industrial assets. Business information may include data management, system platform management, high-risk area management, risk assessment, integrity assessment, repair and maintenance, equipment failure management, performance evaluation, and other business information (for example, corrosion protection). Among them, data management may include management services such as the collection, storage, and utilization of industrial asset data. System platform management may include management services for industrial asset information systems, detection platforms, and other systems or platforms. High-risk area management may be a management service for areas with higher risks. Risk assessment may be a service for assessing risks that may occur during the operation of industrial assets. Integrity assessment may be a service for assessing the overall condition of industrial assets. Repair and maintenance may be a service for maintaining, troubleshooting, and repairing industrial assets. Equipment failure management may be a service for handling and managing industrial asset equipment after failure. Performance evaluation may be a service for evaluating the effectiveness of industrial asset management and system performance.

[0068] In a possible implementation, the implementation process of S201 may be: the electronic device supplements the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the information of the industrial assets and the business information to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0069] Furthermore, in a possible implementation method, the electronic device supplements the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the information of industrial assets and business information to obtain the two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management. The process can be: the electronic device supplements the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the information of industrial assets and business information to obtain an intermediate two-dimensional matrix; the electronic device optimizes the intermediate two-dimensional matrix to obtain the two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0070] Optionally, the electronic device can generate an intermediate two-dimensional matrix by the step of determining the intermediate two-dimensional matrix in the above steps. The intermediate two-dimensional matrix can also be represented as a table, as shown in Table 1. An embodiment of the present application provides an intermediate two-dimensional matrix structure table. The information of industrial assets includes general requirements, pipeline lines, oil and gas station equipment and facilities, LNG receiving stations, underground gas storage, submarine pipelines, special equipment, emergency and repair, and data management. Business information includes system platform, high consequence area, risk assessment, integrity assessment or detection, corrosion protection, third-party damage protection, defect repair, geological disaster protection, scrapping and disposal, and performance evaluation. For ease of understanding, the elements of the intermediate two-dimensional matrix are represented by symbols. The check mark indicates that the element has a corresponding system, and the dash symbol indicates that the element lacks a corresponding system.

[0071] Table 1 Intermediate two-dimensional matrix structure table

[0072]

[0073]

[0074] In one possible implementation, the process of optimizing the intermediate two-dimensional matrix by the electronic device may be as follows: if the intermediate two-dimensional matrix lacks the first element, a new system is obtained, and the missing first element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix is determined based on the new system; if the intermediate two-dimensional matrix includes multiple repeated second elements, a third element is added to the intermediate two-dimensional matrix, and the multiple repeated second elements are deleted, wherein the third element is obtained by merging the multiple repeated second elements; if the adaptability range of the fourth element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix is greater than or equal to the first threshold, the system is refined into multiple systems, and the multiple systems are filled with corresponding elements. The following is a detailed description of the process of supplementing the missing system:

[0075] Optionally, the electronic device determines which asset object information and business information are missing a first element, and determines a new policy based on the first element. The electronic device adds the new policy to the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM to supplement the missing first element. For example, the electronic device determines that the asset object information "underground gas storage" and the business information "performance evaluation" are missing the first element, i.e., that there are no policies applicable to "underground gas storage" and "performance evaluation." The electronic device then develops a new policy, such as underground gas storage performance evaluation standards, and adds the new policy to the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM.

[0076] The following is a detailed description of the deduplication process:

[0077] Optionally, the electronic device determines multiple second elements that appear repeatedly in the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM, merges the second elements with similar or repeated contents to obtain a third element, deletes the second elements with similar or repeated contents in the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM, and adds the third element to the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM.

[0078] It is understandable that the present application merges systems with similar or repeated contents in the two-dimensional matrix of AIM and deletes repeated systems in the two-dimensional matrix of AIM, thereby reducing unnecessary systems and simplifying the two-dimensional matrix of AIM.

[0079] For example, the electronic device detects that the "Pipeline Routing" and "Data Management" fields, as well as the "Oil and Gas Station Field" and "Data Management" fields, share common regulations, such as data management standards. The electronic device then merges these common regulations into a single, common regulation, such as a unified data management standard. It then deletes any common regulations that can be replaced by this common regulation and adds the common regulation to the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM. This common regulation can be applied to data management services for both pipeline routes and oil and gas stations.

[0080] The following is a detailed description of the process of adjusting the scope of application of the system:

[0081] Optionally, the electronic device determines whether the applicable scope of the fourth element is greater than or less than a first threshold. For a system with an applicable scope greater than the first threshold, the electronic device may refine the system into multiple systems and update the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM based on the refined systems. For a system with an applicable scope less than the first threshold, the electronic device may determine a new system based on the range of the fourth element that does not cover the first threshold, and update the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM based on the new system.

[0082] For example, the electronic device obtains information about an existing system (e.g., a system platform standard) whose applicability range between "pipelines" and "underground gas storage" is greater than a first threshold. This is because different asset objects have different requirements for the system platform, and a single system cannot meet these requirements. The electronic device can refine the system into multiple systems. For example, the system platform standard can be refined into a pipeline system platform standard and an underground gas storage system platform standard. The multiple systems obtained through refinement are applicable to different asset objects. The electronic device enters the refined systems into the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM.

[0083] Optionally, the electronic device can also evaluate whether the scope of application of the fourth element exceeds the first threshold based on actual needs. The electronic device can then refine the policy to adjust its scope of application across different asset object information and business information. The electronic device then updates the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM based on the adjusted policy.

[0084] It is understandable that, because existing AIM-required systems have scopes greater than or less than the first threshold, they cannot be accurately applied to the corresponding industrial asset information, resulting in some systems being unusable or ineffective, which in turn leads to poor applicability of these systems, thus affecting the accuracy and effectiveness of the AIM-required systems. By adjusting the scope of application of the systems, this application reduces the number of systems with scopes greater than or less than the first threshold. In other words, because the adjusted systems can be accurately applied to information on specific asset objects and business information, the accuracy of the AIM-required systems is improved. Furthermore, by adjusting the scope of application of the systems, this application reduces the problem of systems being unusable or ineffective due to scopes greater than the first threshold, thereby improving the effectiveness of the AIM-required systems and, consequently, the accuracy and effectiveness of the AIM two-dimensional matrix.

[0085] For example, based on an actual needs assessment, the electronic device determines that the fourth element (e.g., risk assessment criteria) is too broadly applicable to "LNG receiving stations" and "repair and maintenance." The electronic device refines this system into two systems applicable to "LNG receiving stations" and "repair and maintenance," respectively. These two systems can be the LNG receiving station risk assessment standard and the repair and maintenance risk assessment standard. The electronic device then enters the refined systems into the two-dimensional matrix of the AIM.

[0086] It is understandable that the existing AIM system's required three-dimensional structure is complex, making it difficult to manage the systems within it, and thus prone to missing or duplicate systems. This application reduces the dimensionality of the systems required by AIM and optimizes the AIM's two-dimensional matrix using various methods to obtain an optimized AIM two-dimensional matrix. Specifically, because the optimized AIM two-dimensional matrix reduces the number of systems with similar or duplicated content compared to the unoptimized AIM two-dimensional matrix, the optimized AIM two-dimensional matrix has a simpler structure, making it easier to manipulate the AIM two-dimensional matrix, thereby improving the efficiency of the AIM management process. Furthermore, because the optimized AIM two-dimensional matrix supplements missing systems and adjusts the scope of application of the systems compared to the unoptimized AIM two-dimensional matrix, it can reduce errors caused by missing or unusable systems, thereby improving the practicality of the AIM two-dimensional matrix.

[0087] S202 : Based on the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management, information of the industrial assets to be managed is processed to obtain a management score result of the industrial assets to be managed.

[0088] In one possible implementation, the electronic device verifies the validity and feasibility of a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0089] Furthermore, in a possible implementation, the process of verifying the effectiveness and feasibility of the obtained two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management can be: the electronic device uses historical data to test the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management to obtain simulation test results, and compares the simulation test results with the actual results to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0090] Alternatively, the actual result may be the actual use effect of the system required by the three-dimensional AIM. The electronic device verifies the effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional AIM matrix by comparing whether the use effect of the two-dimensional AIM matrix is better than the use effect of the system required by the three-dimensional AIM matrix under the same conditions.

[0091] It will be appreciated that this application tests AIM's two-dimensional matrix based on historical data and simulated scenarios, and verifies the effectiveness and feasibility of AIM's two-dimensional matrix based on the test results. Specifically, by verifying AIM's two-dimensional matrix, potential issues that may arise during the use of AIM's two-dimensional matrix can be promptly identified, facilitating subsequent resolution of such issues. This reduces the probability of errors caused by potential issues during the use of AIM's two-dimensional matrix, thereby improving the safety and reliability of using AIM's two-dimensional matrix.

[0092] Optionally, the electronic device can verify the AIM two-dimensional matrix through expert evaluation. Specifically, the electronic device records the evaluation of the AIM two-dimensional matrix by experts in the AIM field and verifies the validity and feasibility of the AIM two-dimensional matrix based on the evaluation. Furthermore, the electronic device can optimize the AIM two-dimensional matrix based on the expert evaluation.

[0093] Furthermore, the electronic device can optionally verify the AIM two-dimensional matrix through actual application performance. The electronic device can obtain the performance results of the AIM two-dimensional matrix in actual applications through questionnaires or feedback, and verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the AIM two-dimensional matrix based on the performance results. Furthermore, the electronic device can optimize the AIM two-dimensional matrix based on the feedback results.

[0094] In view of this, in an embodiment of the present application, a two-dimensional matrix of AIM is obtained by performing dimensionality reduction processing on the systems required by AIM. The structure of the two-dimensional matrix of AIM is simpler than the structure of the three-dimensional AIM, and the two-dimensional matrix of AIM is easier to understand and manage, thereby reducing the difficulty of managing the systems required by AIM.

[0095] It is understandable that the above-mentioned management score result determination method can be implemented by a management score result determination device. In order to realize the above-mentioned functions, the management score result determination device includes hardware structures and / or software modules corresponding to the execution of each function. Those skilled in the art should easily realize that, in combination with the modules and algorithm steps of each example described in the embodiments disclosed herein, the embodiments disclosed in this application can be implemented in the form of hardware or a combination of hardware and computer software. Whether a function is executed in the form of hardware or computer software driving hardware depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Professional and technical personnel can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered to exceed the scope of the embodiments disclosed in this application.

[0096] The embodiments disclosed in this application can divide the functional modules of the management score result determination device generated by the above method example. For example, each functional module can be divided corresponding to each function, or two or more functions can be integrated into one processing module. The above-mentioned integrated modules can be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional modules. It should be noted that the division of modules in the embodiments disclosed in this application is schematic and is only a logical functional division. In actual implementation, there may be other division methods.

[0097] Figure 4 This is a structural diagram of another management score result determination device 40 provided in an embodiment of the present application. Figure 4 As shown, the management score result determination device 40 can be used to perform Figure 2 The management score result determination method shown in FIG. 4 includes an acquisition unit 401 and a determination unit 402 .

[0098] The determination unit 402 is used to perform dimensionality reduction processing on the asset integrity management system to obtain a two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management; the determination unit 402 is also used to process the information of the industrial assets to be managed based on the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management to obtain a management score result of the industrial assets to be managed.

[0099] In a possible implementation, the determining unit 402 is further configured to supplement the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the industrial asset information and the business information to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0100] In one possible implementation, the determination unit 402 is specifically used to: fill the industrial asset information and business information into the horizontal axis and vertical axis of the initial two-dimensional matrix respectively; determine the corresponding elements in the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the system required for asset integrity management, and obtain the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0101] In a possible implementation, the determination unit 402 is specifically configured to: supplement the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the industrial asset information and the business information to obtain an intermediate two-dimensional matrix; and optimize the intermediate two-dimensional matrix to obtain a two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0102] In one possible implementation, if the intermediate two-dimensional matrix lacks a first element, the acquisition unit 401 is used to obtain a new system; the determination unit 402 is also used to determine the missing first element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix based on the new system; if the intermediate two-dimensional matrix includes multiple repeated second elements, the determination unit is also used to add a third element to the intermediate two-dimensional matrix; the determination unit 402 is also used to delete the multiple repeated second elements, wherein the third element is obtained by merging the multiple repeated second elements; if the adaptation range of the fourth element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix is greater than or equal to the first threshold, the determination unit 402 is also used to refine the system into multiple systems; the determination unit 402 is also used to fill the multiple systems into corresponding elements.

[0103] In a possible implementation, the determination unit 402 is further configured to verify the validity and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

[0104] In a possible implementation, the determination unit 402 is further configured to test the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management using historical data to obtain simulation test results, and compare the simulation test results with actual results to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

[0105] Through the description of the above embodiments, those skilled in the art will clearly understand that for the sake of convenience and brevity, only the division of the above functional modules is used as an example. In actual applications, the above functions can be assigned to different functional modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. The specific working processes of the above-described systems, devices, and units can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0106] The present disclosure also provides a computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon. When the instructions in the storage medium are executed by a processor of an electronic device, the electronic device is enabled to execute the management score result determination method provided in the above-mentioned embodiment of the present disclosure.

[0107] The embodiments of the present disclosure further provide a computer program product comprising instructions, which, when executed on an electronic device, enables the electronic device to execute the management score result determination method provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0108] Among them, the computer-readable storage medium can be, for example, but not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device or device, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media (a non-exhaustive list) include: an electrical connection with one or more wires, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), a register, a hard disk, an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the above, or any other form of computer-readable storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to a processor so that the processor can read information from the storage medium and write information to the storage medium. Of course, the storage medium can also be an integral part of the processor. The processor and the storage medium can be located in an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). In the embodiments of the present application, a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that contains or stores a program that can be used by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0109] The above are only specific embodiments of the present application, but the scope of protection of the present application is not limited thereto. Any changes or replacements within the technical scope disclosed in this application should be included in the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present application should be based on the scope of protection of the claims.

Claims

1. A method for determining a management scoring result, characterized in that: A two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management is obtained by performing dimensionality reduction processing on the systems required for asset integrity management; the horizontal axis of the two-dimensional matrix represents industrial asset information, and the vertical axis of the two-dimensional matrix represents business information of various businesses, wherein the industrial asset information includes pipeline information, oil and gas station information, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving station information; and the business information includes data management information, risk assessment information, and repair and maintenance information. Based on the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management, information of the industrial assets to be managed is processed to obtain a management scoring result of the industrial assets to be managed.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management is obtained by performing dimensionality reduction processing on the system required for asset integrity management, including: The initial two-dimensional matrix is supplemented based on the information of the industrial assets and the business information to obtain the two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The initial two-dimensional matrix is supplemented based on the information of the industrial assets and the business information to obtain the two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management, including: Filling the industrial asset information and the business information into the horizontal axis and vertical axis of the initial two-dimensional matrix respectively; Based on the system required for the asset integrity management, corresponding elements in the initial two-dimensional matrix are determined to obtain the two-dimensional matrix of the asset integrity management.

4. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that The initial two-dimensional matrix is supplemented based on the information of the industrial assets and the business information to obtain the two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management, including: Supplementing the initial two-dimensional matrix based on the information of the industrial assets and the business information to obtain an intermediate two-dimensional matrix; The intermediate two-dimensional matrix is optimized to obtain the two-dimensional matrix for asset integrity management.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that The optimizing the intermediate two-dimensional matrix includes: If the intermediate two-dimensional matrix lacks a first element, obtaining a new system, and determining the first element missing from the intermediate two-dimensional matrix based on the new system; If the intermediate two-dimensional matrix includes a plurality of repeated second elements, adding a third element to the intermediate two-dimensional matrix and deleting the plurality of repeated second elements, wherein the third element is obtained by merging the plurality of repeated second elements; If the adaptation range of the fourth element in the intermediate two-dimensional matrix is greater than or equal to the first threshold, the system is refined into multiple systems, and the multiple systems are filled into corresponding elements.

6. The method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that The method further comprises: The effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management are verified.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that The verification of the effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management includes: The two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management is tested using historical data to obtain simulation test results, and the simulation test results are compared with actual results to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management.

8. A management scoring result determination device, characterized in that: The device includes: an acquisition unit and a determination unit; The determining unit is configured to perform dimensionality reduction processing on the asset integrity management standard system to obtain the two-dimensional matrix of the asset integrity management; The determining unit is configured to process information of the industrial assets to be managed based on the two-dimensional matrix of asset integrity management to obtain a management scoring result of the industrial assets to be managed.

9. A management scoring result determination device, characterized in that: include: A processor and a communication interface; the communication interface is coupled to the processor, and the processor is configured to execute a computer program or instruction to implement the management scoring result determination method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium storing instructions, characterized in that: When a computer executes the instruction, the computer executes the management score result determination method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images