Intelligent ethical examination system and method based on multi-modal information processing

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of medical review, in particular to an ethical review intelligent system based on multi-modal information processing, which comprises a user module, a form review module, an extraction module, a designation module, an approval module, a time limit module, a reminding module, a tracking module and a downloading module. Through a natural language processing technology and structured table analysis, the system realizes automatic extraction of an application file and generation of a standardized review worksheet; transparency and traceability of an examination process are ensured through a block chain evidence storage module; through the time limiting module and the reminding module, the examination efficiency is improved, delay is avoided, the ethical examination process is remarkably optimized, the examination and approval efficiency and standardization are improved, and the method is suitable for ethical examination of biomedical research and clinical test items related to people.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of medical review technology, and in particular to an intelligent ethics review system and method based on multimodal information processing, which aims to optimize the ethics review application process, improve approval efficiency, and ensure the standardization and transparency of the review process. Background Art

[0002] With the development of medical and health institutions and the improvement of scientific research capabilities, more and more biomedical research and clinical trial projects involving humans have emerged. Ethical review is an important measure to protect the safety and rights of subjects and regulate scientific research behavior. However, the existing ethical review process has the following problems: 1. The approval process is cumbersome, and applicants need to submit a large amount of materials, which can easily lead to omissions or irregularities in the format; Second, most reviewers are part-time, and when faced with a large number of review tasks, delays and low efficiency are likely to occur; 3. There is a lack of intelligent process management tools, and the transparency and traceability of the review process are insufficient.

[0003] In response to the above problems, there is an urgent need for an intelligent ethics review application approval system to optimize the application process, improve review efficiency, and ensure the standardization of the review process. Summary of the Invention

[0004] Technical problems solved The present invention provides an intelligent ethics review system and method based on multimodal information processing, which solves the problems of cumbersome approval procedures, low efficiency and lack of transparency in the existing ethics review process.

[0005] Technical Solution In order to achieve the above object, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions: An intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing, comprising: User module, including the following user roles: applicant, secretary, committee member, and chairman; The formality review module is used by secretaries to check the format and completeness of application documents; An extraction module, comprising a text analysis unit and a table parsing unit, for extracting text and tables from application documents and generating a standardized review worksheet; Designated module, used to select corresponding professional committee members for review based on project type; The approval module is used to assign review tasks to committee members for substantive review of projects, and the chairman of the committee will make the final approval and signature of the approval document or opinion letter; Time limit module, which limits the review time through the time limit management mechanism; Reminder module, which sends task reminders to reviewers to avoid review delays; Tracking module, used to track and display application dynamics and project progress within the validity period of the approval in real time; The download module allows users to download documents approved by the chairman and the list of reviewers.

[0006] Furthermore, the extraction module includes: A text analysis unit that uses natural language processing technology to extract key semantic information from application documents; Table parsing unit supports automatic mapping of structured data.

[0007] On the basis of the above scheme, the designated module is used to select corresponding committee members for review according to the project type. After the committee members have reviewed and approved the project, the chairman will sign it, and the signature is an electronic signature.

[0008] Furthermore, the approval module is used to receive the application documents and then conduct a formal review by the secretary. After passing the formal review, it is sent to two committee members for review. If both committee members agree, the formal review is converted into a fast review process and an opinion notification letter or approval document is generated; if one of the committee members disagrees, the formal review is converted into a joint review process, and the secretary generates an opinion notification letter or approval document based on the joint review results.

[0009] Based on the above scheme, the time limit module sets a review time limit to ensure that the review task is completed within the specified time.

[0010] Furthermore, the reminder module sends reminders to the reviewers within the review time limit to prevent review delays.

[0011] Based on the above-mentioned scheme, the download module is used for users in the user module to download the required files for viewing through the download module; the system also includes a data comparison and analysis module and a blockchain evidence module. The data comparison and analysis module is configured to analyze the review efficiency and total review time indicators of each committee member; the blockchain evidence module stores key approval node data to ensure the transparency and traceability of the review process.

[0012] The present invention also proposes a method for an intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing, comprising the following steps: S1: The applicant submits application documents through the user module; S2: The secretary performs format and completeness verification on the application documents through the formality examination module; S3: The extraction module extracts key information from the application documents and generates a standardized review worksheet; S4: The approval module committee members conduct a substantive review of the project and generate an opinion letter or approval document, which is then finally approved and signed by the chairman of the committee; S5: The time limit module manages the review time, and the reminder module sends task reminders; S6: The tracking module tracks and displays application status and project progress within the validity period of the approval in real time; S7: The download module allows users to download the documents approved by the chairman and the list of reviewers; S8: The key approval node data is stored through the blockchain evidence module to ensure the transparency and traceability of the review process.

[0013] The beneficial effects of the present invention are: (1) In the present invention, the review worksheet is generated automatically through the extraction module, which is more convenient and quick, and can be downloaded and viewed, which is more convenient.

[0014] (2) In the present invention, the review time of the committee members is limited by the time limit module to prevent the committee members from failing to process the documents to be reviewed in time, thereby improving the review efficiency. The secretary sends a reminder message to the committee members' email addresses through the reminder module to remind them, thereby preventing the documents to be reviewed from not being reviewed in time.

[0015] (3) In the present invention, different forms of review can be carried out according to different needs, which is more flexible.

[0016] (4) In this invention, the blockchain evidence storage module stores data on key approval nodes, ensuring the transparency and traceability of the review process. The data comparison and analysis module is configured to analyze relevant indicators such as the review efficiency and total review time of each committee member. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the system framework structure of Example 1 of an intelligent ethical review system and method based on multimodal information processing proposed by the present invention.

[0018] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the system framework structure of Example 2 of an intelligent ethical review system and method based on multimodal information processing proposed by the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0019] The following will be combined with the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the embodiments described are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. It should be noted that, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, the terms "install", "connect", and "set" should be understood in a broad sense. For ordinary technicians in this field, the specific meanings of the above terms in this patent can be understood according to specific circumstances.

[0020] Example 1 Reference Figure 1, an intelligent ethics review system based on multimodal information processing, including a user module, including the following user roles: applicant, secretary, committee member, chairman, wherein the applicant is specifically a researcher, sponsor or agent, who is used to submit an ethics review application; the secretary is responsible for formal review and allocation of ethics review tasks, the committee member is responsible for substantive review of the assigned tasks, and after the substantive review is completed, the assigned tasks are transformed into final approval tasks, and the chairman is responsible for signing the final approval task. The formal review module is a formal review of the application documents issued by the applicant by the secretary. The system also includes an extraction module, a designation module, an approval module, a time limit module, a reminder module, a tracking module, and a download module. When conducting a formal review, the secretary extracts information from the application documents through the extraction module to generate a review worksheet, which is automatically It is automatically generated, which is more convenient and quick, and can be downloaded and viewed, which is more convenient. The approval module is connected with the formal review module. After the formal review module is qualified, the secretary sends the review worksheet to the committee member through the designated module. The committee member conducts ethical review through the approval module. The secretary limits the review time of the committee member through the time limit module to prevent the committee member from not being able to process the review documents in time, thereby improving the review efficiency. The time limit module is connected with the reminder module. If the committee member fails to complete the review task within the limited time, the secretary sends a reminder message to the committee member's email through the reminder module to remind him or her to prevent the documents to be reviewed from not being reviewed in time. The approval module is connected with the tracking module. After the approval module reviews and generates the approval document and sends it to the applicant, the tracking module conducts follow-up reviews on the project, such as revised plan review and serious adverse event review, within the validity period of the approval document.

[0021] In the present invention, the extraction module includes: A text analysis unit that uses natural language processing technology to extract key semantic information from application documents; Table parsing unit, supporting automatic mapping of structured data; The approval module is used to receive application documents and conduct a formal review by the secretary. After passing the formal review, it will be sent to two committee members for review. If both committee members agree, the formal review will be transformed into a fast review process and an opinion notification letter or approval document will be generated; if one of the committee members disagrees, the formal review will be transformed into a joint review process, and the secretary will generate an opinion notification letter or approval document based on the joint review results. Different forms of review can be conducted according to different project risks, which is more flexible. The time limit module sets the review time limit to ensure that the review task is completed within the specified time. The reminder module sends reminders to reviewers within the review time limit to prevent review delays.

[0022] The present invention also proposes a method for an intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing, comprising the following steps: S1: The applicant submits application documents through the user module; S2: The secretary performs format and completeness verification on the application documents through the formality examination module; S3: The extraction module extracts key information from the application documents and generates a standardized review worksheet; S4: The approval module committee members conduct a substantive review of the project and generate an opinion letter or approval document, which is then finally approved and signed by the chairman of the committee; S5: The time limit module manages the review time, and the reminder module sends task reminders; S6: The tracking module tracks and displays application status and project progress within the validity period of the approval in real time; S7: The download module allows users to download the documents approved by the chairman and the list of reviewers; S8: The key approval node data is stored through the blockchain evidence module to ensure the transparency and traceability of the review process.

[0023] Example 2 Reference Figure 2 , an intelligent ethics review system based on multimodal information processing, including a user module, including the following user roles: applicant, secretary, committee member, chairman, wherein the applicant is specifically a researcher, sponsor or agent, who is used to submit an ethics review application; the secretary is responsible for formal review and allocation of ethics review tasks, the committee member is responsible for substantive review of the assigned tasks, and after the substantive review is completed, the assigned tasks are transformed into final approval tasks, and the chairman is responsible for signing the final approval task. The formal review module is a formal review of the application documents issued by the applicant by the secretary. The system also includes an extraction module, a designation module, an approval module, a time limit module, a reminder module, a tracking module, and a download module. When conducting a formal review, the secretary extracts information from the application documents through the extraction module to generate a review worksheet, which is automatically It is automatically generated, which is more convenient and quick, and can be downloaded and viewed, which is more convenient. The approval module is connected with the formal review module. After the formal review module is qualified, the secretary sends the review worksheet to the committee member through the designated module. The committee member conducts ethical review through the approval module. The secretary limits the review time of the committee member through the time limit module to prevent the committee member from not being able to process the review documents in time, thereby improving the review efficiency. The time limit module is connected with the reminder module. If the committee member fails to complete the review task within the limited time, the secretary sends a reminder message to the committee member's email through the reminder module to remind him or her to prevent the documents to be reviewed from not being reviewed in time. The approval module is connected with the tracking module. After the approval module reviews and generates the approval document and sends it to the applicant, the tracking module conducts follow-up reviews on the project, such as revised plan review and serious adverse event review, within the validity period of the approval document.

[0024] In the present invention, the extraction module includes: A text analysis unit that uses natural language processing technology to extract key semantic information from application documents; Table parsing unit, supporting automatic mapping of structured data; The approval module is used to receive application documents and then conduct a formal review by the secretary. After the formal review is passed, it will be sent to two committee members for review. If both committee members agree, the formal review will be transformed into a fast review process and an opinion notification letter or approval document will be generated; if one of the committee members disagrees, the formal review will be transformed into a joint review process, and the secretary will generate an opinion notification letter or approval document based on the joint review results. Different forms of review can be conducted according to different project risks, which is more flexible. The time limit module sets the review time limit to ensure that the review task is completed within the specified time. The reminder module sends reminders to the reviewers within the review time limit to prevent review delays. The download module is used for users in the user module to download the required files for viewing through the download module; the system also includes a data comparison and analysis module and a blockchain evidence storage module. The data comparison and analysis module is configured to analyze the review efficiency and total review time indicators of each committee member; the blockchain evidence storage module stores key approval node data to ensure the transparency and traceability of the review process.

[0025] The present invention also proposes an ethics review method based on an ethics review intelligent system for multimodal information processing, comprising the following steps: S1: The applicant submits application documents through the user module; S2: The secretary performs format and completeness verification on the application documents through the formality examination module; S3: The extraction module extracts key information from the application documents and generates a standardized review worksheet; S4: The approval module committee members conduct a substantive review of the project and generate an opinion letter or approval document, which is then finally approved and signed by the chairman of the committee; S5: The time limit module manages the review time, and the reminder module sends task reminders; S6: The tracking module tracks and displays application status and project progress within the validity period of the approval in real time; S7: The download module allows users to download the documents approved by the chairman and the list of reviewers; S8: The key approval node data is stored through the blockchain evidence module to ensure the transparency and traceability of the review process.

[0026] The above description is only a preferred specific embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of protection of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any technician familiar with the technical field, within the technical scope disclosed by the present invention, who makes equivalent replacements or changes based on the technical solution and inventive concept of the present invention, should be covered by the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. An intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing, characterized in that: include: User module, including the following user roles: applicant, secretary, committee member, and chairman; The formality review module is used by secretaries to check the format and completeness of application documents; An extraction module, comprising a text analysis unit and a table parsing unit, for extracting text and tables from application documents and generating a standardized review worksheet; Designated module, used to select corresponding professional committee members for review based on project type; The approval module is used to assign review tasks to committee members for substantive review of projects, and the chairman of the committee will make the final approval and signature of the approval document or opinion letter; Time limit module, which limits the review time through the time limit management mechanism; Reminder module, which sends task reminders to reviewers to avoid review delays; Tracking module, used to track and display application dynamics and project progress within the validity period of the approval in real time; The download module allows users to download documents approved by the chairman and the list of reviewers.

2. The intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The extraction module includes: A text analysis unit that uses natural language processing technology to extract key semantic information from application documents; Table parsing unit supports automatic mapping of structured data.

3. The intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The designated module is used to select corresponding committee members for review according to the project type. After the committee members have reviewed and approved the project, the chairman will sign it, and the signature is an electronic signature.

4. The intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The approval module is used to receive application documents and conduct a formal review by the secretary. After passing the formal review, the application documents are sent to two committee members for review. If both committee members agree, the formal review is converted into a fast review process and an opinion notification letter or approval document is generated; if one of the committee members disagrees, the formal review is converted into a joint review process, and the secretary generates an opinion notification letter or approval document based on the joint review results.

5. The intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The time limit module sets a review time limit to ensure that the review task is completed within the specified time.

6. The intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The reminder module sends reminders to the examiners within the review time limit to prevent review delays.

7. The intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The download module is used for users in the user module to download the required files for viewing through the download module; the system also includes a data comparison and analysis module and a blockchain evidence storage module. The data comparison and analysis module is configured to analyze the review efficiency and total review time indicators of each committee member; the blockchain evidence storage module stores key approval node data to ensure the transparency and traceability of the review process.

8. A method based on the intelligent ethical review system based on multimodal information processing according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: S1: The applicant submits application documents through the user module; S2: The secretary performs format and completeness verification on the application documents through the formality examination module; S3: The extraction module extracts key information from the application documents and generates a standardized review worksheet; S4: The approval module committee members conduct a substantive review of the project and generate an opinion letter or approval document, which is then finally approved and signed by the chairman of the committee; S5: The time limit module manages the review time, and the reminder module sends task reminders; S6: The tracking module tracks and displays application status and project progress within the validity period of the approval in real time; S7: The download module allows users to download the documents approved by the chairman and the list of reviewers; S8: The key approval node data is stored through the blockchain evidence module to ensure the transparency and traceability of the review process.

Images