Comprehensive autonomous level measurement method and device for power industry

Abstract

The invention relates to a power industry comprehensive autonomy level measurement method and device, and the method comprises the steps: determining the index values of three-level indexes through employing the collected data information of each three-level index in a power industry comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system; determining a final weight of a secondary index in the comprehensive autonomous level evaluation system of the power industry; determining the level value and the development index of the first-level index in the comprehensive autonomous level evaluation system of the power industry by using the index value of the third-level index and the final weight of the second-level index; the level value and the development index of the first-level index are evaluation results of the comprehensive autonomous level evaluation system in the power industry. According to the method, the overall autonomy level of the industry can be evaluated from the overall aspect, evaluation can be carried out for the branch industry chain of the industry, a certain emphasis dimension of the autonomy level can be independently evaluated, various application scenes of autonomy level evaluation are improved, evaluation requirements are more accurately met, and the evaluation efficiency is improved. And a datum reference is provided for autonomous and controllable development of an industrial chain in the power industry.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of comprehensive autonomy level evaluation in the electric power industry, and specifically relates to a method and device for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level in the electric power industry. Background Art

[0002] The power industry is a key vehicle for implementing the new energy security strategy and plays a significant role in enhancing energy supply security, scientific and technological security, industrial security, and data security. To better promote the development of control and technological innovation in the power industry, it is necessary to more comprehensively and accurately assess the level of autonomy in the power industry and key equipment technologies, and to establish a comprehensive assessment system.

[0003] The current calculation method for the autonomy rate of the power industry is relatively rough. It lacks distinction in the core role of key components and does not fully consider the impact of the nature of the enterprise on the autonomy and control of the industrial chain. It fails to reflect the level of independent production and substitution of technologies, products, and equipment, nor does it reflect the level of control of industrial chain enterprises and the level of added value of the supply chain. In other words, it is impossible to analyze from the perspective of the entire industry at the macro level, and there is a lack of micro-level evaluation methods for specific equipment technologies. It does not match the current reality of technological industry development and cannot truly reflect the level of autonomy. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In order to overcome the problems existing in the above-mentioned related technologies, the present invention provides a method and device for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry.

[0005] According to a first aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry is provided, comprising:

[0006] Determine the index values ​​of the three-level indicators using the collected data information of the three-level indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry;

[0007] Determine the final weights of the secondary indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry;

[0008] Determine the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry by using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator;

[0009] The level value and development index of the first-level indicator are the evaluation results of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry.

[0010] Preferably, the first-level indicators of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry include at least one of the following: comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry;

[0011] The secondary indicators corresponding to the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry include at least the following four: the autonomy level of key equipment, the autonomy level of technology, the autonomy level of supply chain and the autonomy level of market;

[0012] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of independence of key equipment include at least the following three: independent research and development capability, independent production capability and key parameter level of alternative equipment;

[0013] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of technological independence include at least the following three: the level of control of core technologies, the level of independent intellectual property rights, and the degree of participation in key technology standards;

[0014] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of supply chain autonomy include at least the following five: the level of autonomy in raw material supply, the level of coverage of industrial chain links, the level of control of industrial chain enterprises, the stability of external supply channels, and the proportion of proprietary supply chains;

[0015] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of market autonomy include at least the following five: own market share, external market share, supply chain added value level, comprehensive brand influence and comprehensive consumer recognition.

[0016] Preferably, the method of determining the index values ​​of the three-level indicators by utilizing the collected data information of the three-level indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level assessment system of the power industry includes:

[0017] The data information of the three-level indicators is standardized to obtain the indicator values ​​of the three-level indicators.

[0018] Preferably, the final weight of the secondary indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry is determined, including:

[0019] Using the analytic hierarchy process, the rough set method and the expert scoring method, respectively obtaining the first initial weight, the second initial weight and the third initial weight of the secondary indicator;

[0020] The average of the first initial weight, the second initial weight and the third initial weight is calculated to obtain the final weight of the secondary indicator.

[0021] Preferably, the method of determining the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry by using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator includes:

[0022] Using the index value of the third-level index, the index value of the second-level index is calculated;

[0023] Calculate the level value of the first-level indicator using the indicator value of the second-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator;

[0024] The development index of the first-level indicator is calculated using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator.

[0025] Preferably, the calculation formula of the index value of the secondary index includes:

[0026]

[0027] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; n∈[1,N], N is the total number of tertiary indicators corresponding to the mth secondary indicator; Fm is the indicator value of the mth secondary indicator, and fn is the indicator value of the nth tertiary indicator corresponding to the mth secondary indicator.

[0028] Preferably, the calculation formula for the level value of the first-level indicator includes:

[0029]

[0030] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; D is the level value of the first-level indicator, Fm is the indicator value of the mth second-level indicator, ω m is the final weight of the mth secondary indicator.

[0031] Preferably, the calculation formula of the development index of the first-level indicator includes:

[0032]

[0033] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; n∈[1,N], N is the total number of tertiary indicators corresponding to the mth secondary indicator; Z is the development index of the first-level indicator, fn is the index value of the nth tertiary indicator corresponding to the mth secondary indicator, ω m is the final weight of the mth secondary indicator.

[0034] According to a second aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a device for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the electric power industry is provided, comprising:

[0035] A first determining unit is configured to determine the index value of each of the three-level indicators by using the collected data information of the three-level indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level assessment system of the power industry;

[0036] A second determining unit is used to determine the final weight of the secondary indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry;

[0037] A third determining unit is configured to determine the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry by using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator;

[0038] The fourth determining unit is used to determine that the level value and development index of the first-level indicator are the evaluation results of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry.

[0039] According to a third aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an electronic device, comprising: at least one processor and a memory; the memory and the processor are connected via a bus;

[0040] The memory is used to store one or more programs;

[0041] When the one or more programs are executed by the at least one processor, the method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry is implemented.

[0042] According to a fourth aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a readable storage medium is provided, on which an execution program is stored. When the execution program is executed, the method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry is implemented.

[0043] The technical solution provided by the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0044] The present invention provides a method and device for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the electric power industry, including: using the collected data information of each three-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the electric power industry to determine the index value of the three-level indicator; determining the final weight of the secondary indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the electric power industry; using the index value of the three-level indicator and the final weight of the secondary indicator to determine the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the electric power industry; the level value and development index of the first-level indicator is the evaluation result of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the electric power industry. The technical solution provided by the present invention not only realizes the overall evaluation of the overall autonomy level of the industry, but also can be evaluated for the branch industry chain of the industry, and can perform a separate evaluation on a certain focus dimension of the autonomy level, thereby improving the various applicable scenarios of the autonomy level evaluation and more accurately meeting the evaluation needs; by determining the autonomy development index of the electric power industry, it can provide a benchmark reference for the independent and controllable development of the power industry industry chain. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0045] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0046] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 2 Schematic diagram of a comprehensive autonomy level assessment system for the power industry provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] Figure 3 This is a flow chart of a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0049] Figure 4 This is a structural block diagram of a device for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0050] Figure 5 This is a structural block diagram of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0051] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the present invention more clear, the technical solutions of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the following embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of them. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0052] Example 1

[0053] The present invention provides a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry. Figure 1 As shown, the following steps are included:

[0054] Step 11: Using the collected data information of each level 3 indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level assessment system of the power industry, determine the indicator values ​​of the level 3 indicators;

[0055] Step 12: Determine the final weights of the secondary indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level assessment system for the power industry;

[0056] Step 13: Determine the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry using the indicator values ​​of the third-level indicators and the final weights of the second-level indicators;

[0057] Step 14: The level value and development index of the first-level indicators are the evaluation results of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry.

[0058] Further, such as Figure 2 As shown, the first-level indicators of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry include at least one of the following: comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry;

[0059] The secondary indicators corresponding to the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry include at least the following four: the autonomy level of key equipment, the autonomy level of technology, the autonomy level of supply chain and the autonomy level of market;

[0060] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of independence of key equipment include at least the following three: independent research and development capabilities, independent production capabilities and key parameter levels of alternative equipment;

[0061] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of technological independence include at least the following three: the level of control of core technologies, the level of independent intellectual property rights, and the degree of participation in key technology standards;

[0062] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of supply chain autonomy include at least the following five: the level of autonomy in raw material supply, the level of coverage of industrial chain links, the level of control of industrial chain enterprises, the stability of external supply channels, and the proportion of self-owned supply chains;

[0063] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of market autonomy include at least the following five: own market share, external market share, supply chain added value level, comprehensive brand influence and comprehensive consumer recognition.

[0064] The present invention comprehensively considers key equipment, technical level, supply chain, market competitiveness, etc., constructs an autonomy level measurement system and evaluation method, which can comprehensively reflect the degree of autonomy.

[0065] Furthermore, step 11 includes:

[0066] The data information of the three-level indicators is standardized to obtain the indicator values ​​of the three-level indicators.

[0067] It should be noted that the method of "standardizing the data information of the three-level indicators" involved in the embodiment of the present invention is well known to those skilled in the art, so its specific implementation method will not be described in detail.

[0068] Furthermore, step 12 includes:

[0069] Step 121: using the analytic hierarchy process, the rough set method, and the expert scoring method, respectively obtaining the first initial weight, the second initial weight, and the third initial weight of the secondary indicators;

[0070] Step 122: Calculate the average of the first initial weight, the second initial weight, and the third initial weight to obtain the final weight of the secondary indicator.

[0071] It should be noted that the method of "using the hierarchical analysis method, the rough set method and the expert scoring method to obtain the first initial weight, the second initial weight and the third initial weight of the secondary indicators respectively" involved in the embodiment of the present invention is well known to those skilled in the art. Therefore, its specific implementation method will not be described in detail.

[0072] The present invention proposes an evaluation method for the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry, realizes the quantitative calculation and comprehensive evaluation of the autonomy level of the power industry, improves the scientificity and accuracy of the comprehensive autonomy level measurement of the power industry, and further proposes the power industry autonomy development index, which provides a reference for the development and comparison of the independent and controllable power industry chain. Furthermore, step 13 includes:

[0073] Step 131: using the index value of the third-level index, calculate the index value of the second-level index;

[0074] Specifically, the calculation formula for the index value of the secondary index includes:

[0075]

[0076] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; n∈[1,N], N is the total number of tertiary indicators corresponding to the mth secondary indicator; Fm is the indicator value of the mth secondary indicator, and fn is the indicator value of the nth tertiary indicator corresponding to the mth secondary indicator;

[0077] Step 132: Calculate the level value of the first-level indicator using the index value of the second-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator. Specifically, the calculation formula for the level value of the first-level indicator includes:

[0078]

[0079] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; D is the level value of the first-level indicator, Fm is the indicator value of the mth second-level indicator, ω m is the final weight of the mth secondary indicator;

[0080] Step 133: Calculate the development index of the first-level indicator using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator;

[0081] Specifically, the calculation formula for the development index of the first-level indicator includes:

[0082]

[0083] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; n∈[1,N], N is the total number of tertiary indicators corresponding to the mth secondary indicator; Z is the development index of the first-level indicator, fn is the index value of the nth tertiary indicator corresponding to the mth secondary indicator, ω m is the final weight of the mth secondary indicator.

[0084] By providing a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry, the present invention can track and analyze the autonomy and risk resistance capabilities of the new power system industrial system and key areas, and provide a reference for promoting the power industry to jointly accelerate the completion and strengthening of the supply chain.

[0085] The present invention provides a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry, which can accurately calculate the autonomy rate of the power industry and distinguish the core roles of key components. It comprehensively considers the impact of the nature of the enterprise on the autonomy and control of the industrial chain. It not only reflects the level of independent production and substitution of technology, products, and equipment, but also reflects the control level of industrial chain enterprises and the added value level of the supply chain. That is, it analyzes from the perspective of the entire industry at a macro level, and also provides an evaluation method for specific equipment technology at a micro level. It matches the current reality of technological industry development and truly reflects the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry.

[0086] To further illustrate the above-mentioned method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry, the present invention provides a specific example for quantitatively calculating and comprehensively evaluating the autonomy level of the power industry, including:

[0087] First, determine the relevant dimensions of the comprehensive autonomy level assessment system for the power industry; then use the autonomy level-related indicators of key equipment, technology, supply chain, market and other dimensions to obtain data, and set the weights of each dimension; finally, integrate and calculate the data and weights of the four dimensions to form an assessment result. The assessment result can reflect the overall autonomy level of the industry, the autonomy level of the branch industry chain, the autonomy level of a certain focus dimension, etc., and is universal and scientific.

[0088] like Figure 2 As shown in the figure, in terms of evaluation system design, four sub-dimensions are designed as secondary indicators: key equipment, technology, supply chain, and market. Each sub-dimension has 2-3 specific indicators as tertiary indicators (a total of 12 core indicators). The data information of the tertiary indicators is standardized to obtain the index values ​​of the tertiary indicators. The index values ​​of the tertiary indicators are then used to determine the index values ​​of each sub-dimension. The evaluation system is divided into four sub-dimensions, and their specific meanings are shown below.

[0089] The level of independence of key equipment S: mainly measures the independent research and development capability S1, independent production capability S2 and the key parameter level of substitutable equipment S3, among which the independent production capability includes the production capability of key components, parts and materials;

[0090] The calculation formula for the index value S of the key equipment autonomy level includes:

[0091] S=(S1+S2+S3) / 3

[0092] In the above formula, S1 is the index value of independent research and development capability, S2 is the index value of independent production capability, and S3 is the index value of the key parameter level of alternative equipment.

[0093] Technological Independence Level J: This primarily measures the level of control over core technologies J1, the level of independent intellectual property rights J2, and the degree of participation in key technology standards J3. This includes whether a company has mastered core technologies, possessed independent intellectual property rights, and whether its technological level meets or exceeds prevailing standards in the external industry. Participation in the formulation of external industry standards is also a key indicator of the degree of independence. Being able to participate in the formulation of external industry standards signifies a certain degree of industry influence and voice.

[0094] The calculation formula of the index value J of the level of technological independence includes:

[0095] J=(J1+J2+J3) / 3

[0096] In the above formula, J1 is the index value of the core technology control level, J2 is the index value of the independent intellectual property level, and J3 is the index value of the degree of participation in key technology standards.

[0097] The level of autonomy of the core supply chain G: It mainly measures the level of autonomy in raw material supply G1, the level of coverage of industrial chain links G2, the level of control of industrial chain enterprises G3, the stability level of external supply channels G4 and the proportion of the own supply chain G5, that is, whether the supply chain industry chain is complete, whether the raw material supply is independent and stable, the nature of all enterprises in the industrial chain, whether equipment that must rely on imports has diversified channels, the current proportion of the own supply chain, etc., to analyze whether the key links in the supply chain can be independently controlled, and the proportion of own suppliers in the entire supply chain.

[0098] The calculation formula for the index value G of the core supply chain autonomy level includes:

[0099] G=(G1+G2+G3+G4+G5) / 5

[0100] In the above formula, G1 is the index value of the level of independence in raw material supply, G2 is the index value of the coverage level of industrial chain links, G3 is the index value of the control level of industrial chain enterprises, G4 is the index value of the stability level of external supply channels, and G5 is the index value of the proportion of the own supply chain.

[0101] Market autonomy level (P): This primarily measures owned market share (P1), external market share (P2), supply chain value-added (P3), comprehensive brand influence (P4), and comprehensive consumer recognition (P5). It reflects the market development and scale of the company's core businesses, as well as market competitiveness. It primarily includes owned market share, external market share, overall supply chain value-added, comprehensive brand influence, and comprehensive consumer recognition.

[0102] The calculation formula for the index value P of the market autonomy level includes:

[0103] P=(P1+P2+P3+P4+P5) / 5

[0104] In the above formula, P1 is the index value of the company's own market share, P2 is the index value of the external market share, P3 is the index value of the supply chain added value level, P4 is the index value of the comprehensive brand influence, and P5 is the index value of the comprehensive consumer recognition.

[0105] Based on the dimensions of the evaluation system, we further set the weights of specific indicators and determine the calculation methods. As shown in Table 1, the calculation methods for each specific indicator are as follows:

[0106] Table 1 Description of evaluation indicators for the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry

[0107]

[0108]

[0109] In terms of calculation, for each indicator, the weights of indicators at each level given in the literature can be used (for example, for the evaluation of the power industry as a whole, the weight of the level of autonomy of key equipment ω S The weight of technological autonomy is 30%, and the weight of technological autonomy is ω J The weight of the supply chain autonomy level is 25%, and the G The weight of the market autonomy level is 25%, and the P 20%); you can also use the analytic hierarchy process, rough set method and expert scoring method to obtain the first initial weight, second initial weight and third initial weight of the secondary indicator respectively, calculate the average of the first initial weight, second initial weight and third initial weight, and obtain the final weight of the secondary indicator (for example, after calculation, the weight of the key equipment autonomy level ω S The weight of technological autonomy is 30%, and the weight of technological autonomy is ω J The weight of the supply chain autonomy level is 25%, and the G The weight of the market autonomy level is 25%, and the P is 20%).

[0110] The calculation formula for the level value D of the first-level indicator of the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry includes:

[0111] D=S*ω S +J*ω J +G*ω G +P*ω P

[0112] =ω S* (S1+S2+S3) / 3+ωJ* (J1+J2+J3) / 3+ω G* (G1+G2+G3+G4+G5) / 5+ω P* (P1+P2+P3+P4+P5) / 5.

[0113] It is worth pointing out that this indicator system can be used not only to evaluate the overall level of autonomy of the power industry, but also to evaluate the branch industrial chains of the power industry, such as the power transmission and distribution industry chain, the power distribution and utilization industry chain, the intelligent operation and maintenance industry chain, and the power dispatching industry chain, etc. The weights are adjusted according to actual conditions.

[0114] In order to better reflect the development of autonomy, the present invention further proposes an autonomous development index for the electric power industry, calculates the square average of each indicator to better reflect the difference between historical data, reflects the development of the index, and defines it as the autonomous development index Z for the electric power industry.

[0115] The calculation formula for the development index Z of the first-level indicator of the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry includes:

[0116]

[0117] The present invention also provides a specific example, such as Figure 3 As shown, the following steps are included:

[0118] Step 1: Determine the evaluation object: the new power system industry chain (mainly including core areas such as ultra-high voltage equipment, smart grid equipment, energy storage equipment, and new energy power generation equipment).

[0119] Step 2: Determine the four dimensions of the autonomy level of the assessment object and its second- and third-level indicators.

[0120] The first layer (target layer): the comprehensive autonomy level of the new power system transmission and transformation equipment industry chain;

[0121] The second layer (dimension layer): the level of autonomy of key equipment, key technologies, core supply chains and market;

[0122] The third layer (indicator layer): Each dimension has 2-3 specific indicators (a total of 12 core indicators).

[0123] Step 3: Input data and calculate the data results of each indicator.

[0124] (1) Dimension 1: Level of autonomy of key equipment

[0125]

[0126] Evaluation results: The comprehensive score of equipment autonomy is 93.2%.

[0127] (2) Dimension 2: Level of autonomy in key technologies

[0128]

[0129] Evaluation results: The comprehensive score of technological independence is 78.7%.

[0130] (3) Dimension 3: Level of core supply chain autonomy

[0131]

[0132]

[0133] Evaluation results: The overall score of supply chain autonomy is 44.9%.

[0134] (4) Dimension 4: Level of market autonomy

[0135]

[0136] Evaluation results: The comprehensive score of market autonomy is 60.3%.

[0137] Step 4: Output the evaluation results, including the overall autonomy level and development index, as well as the autonomy level of each dimension.

[0138] Indicator weight distribution: Weight of key equipment autonomy level ω S The weight of technological autonomy is 30%. J The weight of the supply chain autonomy level is 25%, and the G The weight of market autonomy level is 25%. P is 20%.

[0139] Example of evaluation results:

[0140] The comprehensive score of equipment autonomy is S = 93.2%;

[0141] Comprehensive score of technological autonomy J = 78.7%;

[0142] The overall score of supply chain autonomy is G = 44.9%;

[0143] The overall score of market autonomy is P = 60.3%;

[0144] The level of comprehensive autonomy of the power industry is D = S*ω S +J*ω J +G*ω G +P*ω P

[0145] =93.2%*0.3+78.7%*0.25+44.9%*0.25+60.3%*0.2

[0146] =70.9%;

[0147] The development index of the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry is Z = 71.6, as shown below:

[0148]

[0149] Experiments have shown that, in practical applications, the method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry provided by the present invention provides an accurate and reliable benchmark reference for evaluating the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry.

[0150] The present invention provides a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry, which overcomes the previous problems of unclear autonomy analysis dimensions and undetermined data indicators, and proposes four dimensions for autonomy level assessment and calculation. It can not only evaluate the overall autonomy level of the industry as a whole, but also evaluate the industry's branch industrial chain, and can also evaluate a certain focus dimension of the autonomy level separately, thereby improving the various applicable scenarios of autonomy level assessment and more accurately meeting assessment needs; the present invention proposes a development index for the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry, which can provide a benchmark reference for the autonomous and controllable development of the power industry's industrial chain.

[0151] Example 2

[0152] The present invention also provides a device for measuring the level of comprehensive autonomy in the power industry, such as Figure 4 As shown, including:

[0153] The first determining unit is used to determine the index value of the third-level index by using the collected data information of each third-level index in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry;

[0154] The second determination unit is used to determine the final weight of the secondary indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry;

[0155] The third determination unit is used to determine the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry by using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator;

[0156] The fourth determination unit is used for the level value and development index of the first-level indicators, which are the evaluation results of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry.

[0157] Furthermore, the first-level indicator of the comprehensive autonomy level assessment system for the power industry includes at least one of the following: the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry;

[0158] The secondary indicators corresponding to the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry include at least the following four: the autonomy level of key equipment, the autonomy level of technology, the autonomy level of supply chain and the autonomy level of market;

[0159] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of independence of key equipment include at least the following three: independent research and development capabilities, independent production capabilities and key parameter levels of alternative equipment;

[0160] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of technological independence include at least the following three: the level of control of core technologies, the level of independent intellectual property rights, and the degree of participation in key technology standards;

[0161] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of supply chain autonomy include at least the following five: the level of autonomy in raw material supply, the level of coverage of industrial chain links, the level of control of industrial chain enterprises, the stability of external supply channels, and the proportion of self-owned supply chains;

[0162] The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of market autonomy include at least the following five: own market share, external market share, supply chain added value level, comprehensive brand influence and comprehensive consumer recognition.

[0163] Furthermore, the first determining unit is specifically configured to:

[0164] The data information of the three-level indicators is standardized to obtain the indicator values ​​of the three-level indicators.

[0165] Furthermore, the second determining unit is specifically configured to:

[0166] The first initial weight, second initial weight and third initial weight of the secondary indicators are obtained respectively by using the analytic hierarchy process, rough set method and expert scoring method;

[0167] The average of the first initial weight, the second initial weight, and the third initial weight is calculated to obtain the final weight of the secondary indicator.

[0168] Furthermore, the third determining unit includes:

[0169] The first calculation module is used to calculate the index value of the second-level index using the index value of the third-level index;

[0170] The second calculation module is used to calculate the level value of the first-level indicator by using the indicator value of the second-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator;

[0171] The third calculation module is used to calculate the development index of the first-level indicator by using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator.

[0172] Furthermore, the calculation formula of the indicator value of the secondary indicator includes:

[0173]

[0174] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; n∈[1,N], N is the total number of tertiary indicators corresponding to the mth secondary indicator; Fm is the indicator value of the mth secondary indicator, and fn is the indicator value of the nth tertiary indicator corresponding to the mth secondary indicator.

[0175] Furthermore, the calculation formula for the level value of the first-level indicator includes:

[0176]

[0177] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; D is the level value of the first-level indicator, Fm is the indicator value of the mth second-level indicator, ω m is the final weight of the mth secondary indicator.

[0178] Furthermore, the calculation formula for the development index of the first-level indicator includes:

[0179]

[0180] In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; n∈[1,N], N is the total number of tertiary indicators corresponding to the mth secondary indicator; Z is the development index of the first-level indicator, fn is the index value of the nth tertiary indicator corresponding to the mth secondary indicator, ω m is the final weight of the mth secondary indicator.

[0181] It can be understood that the device embodiment provided above corresponds to the method embodiment above, and the corresponding specific contents can be referenced to each other and will not be repeated here.

[0182] It can be understood that the same or similar parts of the above embodiments can be referenced to each other, and the contents not described in detail in some embodiments can refer to the same or similar contents in other embodiments.

[0183] Example 3

[0184] like Figure 5 As shown, the present invention also provides an electronic device, which may be a computer, a single-chip microcomputer, a smart mobile device, or the like. The electronic device in this embodiment may include a processor, a memory, a transceiver component, and the like. The memory, processor, and transceiver component are connected via a bus; the memory may be used to store an execution program, which may include instructions; and the processor may be used to execute the instructions stored in the memory. The memory may also be used to store data, which may be accessed and / or modified during the execution of the instructions.

[0185] The processor may be a central processing unit (CPU), or it may be other general-purpose processors, digital signal processors (DSP), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. It is the computing core and control core of the terminal, which is suitable for implementing one or more instructions, specifically suitable for loading and executing one or more instructions in the storage medium to implement the corresponding method flow or corresponding function, so as to realize the steps of a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry in the above embodiment.

[0186] Example 4

[0187] Based on the same inventive concept, the present invention also provides a readable storage medium, specifically an electronic device readable storage medium (Memory), which is a memory device in an electronic device for storing programs and data. It can be understood that the storage medium here can include both built-in storage media in the electronic device and, of course, extended storage media supported by the electronic device. The storage medium provides a storage space, which stores the operating system of the terminal. In addition, one or more instructions suitable for being loaded and executed by the processor are also stored in the storage space. These instructions can be one or more execution programs (including program codes). It should be noted that the storage medium here can be a high-speed RAM memory or a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), such as at least one disk memory. The processor loads and executes one or more instructions stored in the storage medium, which can implement the steps of a method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry in the above embodiment.

[0188] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the present invention may be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Thus, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to magnetic disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) containing computer-usable program code.

[0189] The present invention is described with reference to flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the present invention. It should be understood that each process and / or block in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams, as well as combinations of processes and / or blocks in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded processor, or other programmable data processing device to produce a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams. Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.

[0190] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to work in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer readable memory produce an article of manufacture comprising an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The function specified in one or more boxes.

[0191] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operational steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable device for implementing the process. Figure 1 a process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A step that specifies a function in one or more boxes.

[0192] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and not to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the above embodiments, ordinary technicians in the field should understand that the specific implementation methods of the present invention can still be modified or replaced by equivalents. Any modification or equivalent replacement that does not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention should be covered by the scope of protection of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry, characterized by: include: Determine the index values ​​of the three-level indicators using the collected data information of the three-level indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry; Determine the final weights of the secondary indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry; Determine the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry by using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator; The level value and development index of the first-level indicator are the evaluation results of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The first-level indicators of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry include at least one of the following: comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry; The secondary indicators corresponding to the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry include at least the following four: the autonomy level of key equipment, the autonomy level of technology, the autonomy level of supply chain and the autonomy level of market; The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of independence of key equipment include at least the following three: independent research and development capability, independent production capability and key parameter level of alternative equipment; The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of technological independence include at least the following three: the level of control of core technologies, the level of independent intellectual property rights, and the degree of participation in key technology standards; The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of supply chain autonomy include at least the following five: the level of autonomy in raw material supply, the level of coverage of industrial chain links, the level of control of industrial chain enterprises, the stability of external supply channels, and the proportion of proprietary supply chains; The three-level indicators corresponding to the level of market autonomy include at least the following five: own market share, external market share, supply chain added value level, comprehensive brand influence and comprehensive consumer recognition.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The method of utilizing the collected data information of each third-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level assessment system of the electric power industry to determine the index value of the third-level indicator includes: The data information of the three-level indicators is standardized to obtain the indicator values ​​of the three-level indicators.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein The final weights of the secondary indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry are determined, including: Using the analytic hierarchy process, the rough set method and the expert scoring method, respectively obtaining the first initial weight, the second initial weight and the third initial weight of the secondary indicator; The average of the first initial weight, the second initial weight and the third initial weight is calculated to obtain the final weight of the secondary indicator.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The method of determining the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry by using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator includes: Using the index value of the third-level index, the index value of the second-level index is calculated; Calculate the level value of the first-level indicator using the indicator value of the second-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator; The development index of the first-level indicator is calculated using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator.

6. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that The calculation formula of the index value of the secondary index includes: In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; n∈[1,N], N is the total number of tertiary indicators corresponding to the mth secondary indicator; Fm is the indicator value of the mth secondary indicator, and fn is the indicator value of the nth tertiary indicator corresponding to the mth secondary indicator.

7. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that The calculation formula for the level value of the first-level indicator includes: In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; D is the level value of the first-level indicator, Fm is the indicator value of the mth second-level indicator, ω m is the final weight of the mth secondary indicator.

8. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that The calculation formula for the development index of the first-level indicator includes: In the above formula, m∈[1,M], M is the total number of secondary indicators; n∈[1,N], N is the total number of tertiary indicators corresponding to the mth secondary indicator; Z is the development index of the first-level indicator, fn is the index value of the nth tertiary indicator corresponding to the mth secondary indicator, ω m is the final weight of the mth secondary indicator.

9. A device for measuring the level of comprehensive autonomy in the power industry, characterized in that: include: A first determining unit is configured to determine the index value of each of the three-level indicators by using the collected data information of the three-level indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level assessment system of the power industry; A second determining unit is used to determine the final weight of the secondary indicators in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry; A third determining unit is configured to determine the level value and development index of the first-level indicator in the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry by using the indicator value of the third-level indicator and the final weight of the second-level indicator; The fourth determining unit is used to determine that the level value and development index of the first-level indicator are the evaluation results of the comprehensive autonomy level evaluation system of the power industry.

10. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: at least one processor and memory; The memory and the processor are connected via a bus; The memory is used to store one or more programs; When the one or more programs are executed by the at least one processor, the method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the electric power industry according to any one of claims 1 to 8 is implemented.

11. A readable storage medium, characterized in that: An execution program is stored thereon, and when the execution program is executed, the method for measuring the comprehensive autonomy level of the power industry as described in any one of claims 1 to 8 is implemented.

Images