Method and device for determining current waste silk interference risk of elasticizer, electronic equipment and storage medium
By analyzing the historical trajectory and directional relationship of waste yarn in the environment surrounding the texturing machine, the approach and departure trends of waste yarn to the texturing machine are determined, the risk of waste yarn interference is corrected, the impact of waste yarn on fiber quality is resolved, and the accuracy of the risk of waste yarn interference is improved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202511243327.6
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-09-01
- Publication Date
- 2025-11-18
AI Technical Summary
During the texturing process of a texturing machine, the quality of the fiber is affected by the interference of waste fibers in the surrounding environment, and existing technologies make it difficult to effectively determine the interference risk of waste fibers.
By analyzing the historical trajectories of waste wires in the working environment of the texturing machine and the directional relationship between the trajectory points and the texturing machine, the current approach trend of the waste wires relative to the texturing machine is determined. Combined with the moving away trend of the waste wires relative to the texturing machine, the risk of waste wire interference is corrected.
It improves the accuracy of risk assessment for waste yarn interference, ensures the quality of fiber yarn, and reduces the impact of waste yarn on the texturing machine.
Smart Images

Figure CN120976579A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This disclosure relates to the field of image processing technology. Specifically, it relates to a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine. Background Technology
[0002] In the production of chemical fibers, texturing is a process that transforms thermoplastic chemical fiber filaments into elastic yarns on a texturing machine. The fibers are heated by a heater and subjected to false twisting or crimping while hot, followed by cooling and untwisting to produce high-elasticity yarns. If an additional heat setting is applied, low-elasticity yarns can be produced.
[0003] Among these, temperature, time, tension, and the degree of false twist deformation during processing are the main process parameters for texturing. These parameters vary depending on the composition, linear density, and product characteristics of the fed raw yarn, and are closely related to product quality. During the false twist deformation process, due to the presence of waste yarn in the surrounding environment, the composition of the fed raw yarn may be mixed with waste yarn, thus affecting the quality of the fiber yarn after texturing. Summary of the Invention
[0004] This disclosure provides a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine.
[0005] According to one aspect of this disclosure, a method for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine is provided, comprising:
[0006] Based on the image sequence of the texturing working environment of the texturing machine from the past moment to the present moment, the historical movement trajectory of waste wire in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine is determined;
[0007] Based on the directional relationship between the trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined;
[0008] Based on the current approach trend of the waste yarn relative to the texturing machine, determine the current waste yarn interference risk of the waste yarn to the texturing machine;
[0009] Based on the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory, the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine is determined;
[0010] Based on the current trend of the waste yarn moving away from the texturing machine, the risk of the waste yarn interfering with the texturing machine is corrected.
[0011] According to another aspect of this disclosure, an apparatus for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine is provided, comprising:
[0012] The historical trajectory determination module is used to determine the historical movement trajectory of waste wire in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine based on the image sequence of the texturing working environment from the past moment to the current moment;
[0013] The first trend determination module is used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between the trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine;
[0014] An interference risk determination module is used to determine the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine based on the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0015] The second trend determination module is used to determine the current moving away trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory;
[0016] An interference risk correction module is used to correct the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine based on the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine.
[0017] According to another aspect of this disclosure, an electronic device is provided, comprising:
[0018] At least one processor; and
[0019] The memory is communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein,
[0020] The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform a method for determining the current waste wire interference risk of any texturing machine in the embodiments of this disclosure.
[0021] According to another aspect of this disclosure, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium is provided storing computer instructions, wherein the computer instructions are used to cause the computer to perform a method for determining the current waste wire interference risk of any texturing machine according to an embodiment of this disclosure.
[0022] According to the technology disclosed herein, by utilizing the directional relationship between the trajectory of waste wire in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine from the past moment to the present moment and the texturing machine, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined. Thus, the current waste wire interference risk relative to the texturing machine is determined based on the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine, thereby improving the accuracy of the current waste wire interference risk.
[0023] It should be understood that the description in this section is not intended to identify key or essential features of the embodiments of this disclosure, nor is it intended to limit the scope of this disclosure. Other features of this disclosure will become readily apparent from the following description. Attached Figure Description
[0024] The accompanying drawings are provided to better understand this solution and do not constitute a limitation of this disclosure. Wherein:
[0025] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the working environment of a texturing machine according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0026] Figure 2 This is a flowchart of a method for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0027] Figure 3 This is a flowchart of a method for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine according to another embodiment of this disclosure;
[0028] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the trajectory of waste filament movement according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0029] Figure 5 This is a structural block diagram of a device for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0030] Figure 6 This is a block diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. Detailed Implementation
[0031] The exemplary embodiments of this disclosure are described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, including various details of the embodiments to aid understanding, and should be considered merely exemplary. Therefore, those skilled in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications can be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Similarly, for clarity and brevity, descriptions of well-known functions and structures are omitted in the following description.
[0032] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the working environment of a texturing machine according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0033] like Figure 1As shown, the texturing machine's working environment includes multiple texturing machines 110. Only two texturing machines are shown as an example, but the model is not limited to two. During the operation of the texturing machine 110 and other fiber processing equipment, waste fibers 120 may be generated and left in the surrounding environment. These waste fibers may affect the false twisting process of the false twisting mechanism 130 on the fiber 140 in the texturing machine 110, and the waste fibers may become entangled in the false twisted fiber 140, affecting the quality of the fiber 140. Therefore, the technical solution provided in this disclosure can identify the risk of waste fiber interference from the texturing machine, thereby performing waste fiber treatment, improving cleaning efficiency, and improving the quality of the fiber 140.
[0034] Figure 2 This is a flowchart of a method for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0035] like Figure 2 As shown, the method for determining the current waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine may include:
[0036] S210, Based on the image sequence of the texturing working environment of the texturing machine from the past time to the present time, determine the historical movement trajectory of the waste wire in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine;
[0037] S220, based on the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine, determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine;
[0038] S230, based on the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine, determine the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine.
[0039] For example, the image sequence of the texturing working environment may include multiple images arranged in chronological order. A pre-trained image segmentation model can be used to identify each image in the texturing working environment image sequence to obtain the position information of the texturing machine and the position information of each waste wire in each image. Using the position information of the texturing machine and the position information of each waste wire in each image, the historical movement trajectory of each waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be determined. Using the historical movement trajectory of each waste wire relative to the texturing machine, the historical movement trajectory of one or more target waste wires relative to the texturing machine can be determined. In this way, steps S220 to S230 are performed on each target waste wire to obtain the current waste wire interference risk of each target waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0040] For example, waste yarn is a fibrous material, and therefore waste yarn can be a spool of waste yarn, in which long and short fibers are intertwined and have a certain fluffy volume.
[0041] For example, in determining the historical movement trajectory of waste wire, a first trajectory can be determined based on the center position of the waste wire at each moment when the distance between the waste wire's position and the texturing machine's position is greater than a preset third distance. When the distance between the waste wire's position and the texturing machine's position is less than a preset fourth distance, a second trajectory is determined based on the closest position of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine at each moment. The fourth distance is less than the third distance. Then, based on the first and second trajectories, a third trajectory is fitted from the end point of the first trajectory to the starting point of the second trajectory. The first, third, and second trajectories are then merged sequentially to obtain the historical movement trajectory of the waste wire. In this way, the historical movement trajectory fully considers the influence of the waste wire's volume on the trajectory, which can improve the accuracy of the historical movement trajectory of the waste wire.
[0042] For example, by using the straight-line direction between the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory and the displacement direction of the historical movement trajectory, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be determined. For instance, the smaller the angle between these two directions, the greater the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine. The larger the angle between these two directions, the smaller the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0043] For example, by using the straight-line direction between the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory and the tangent direction of that nearest point on the historical movement trajectory, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be determined. For instance, the smaller the angle between these two directions, the greater the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine. The larger the angle between the two directions, the smaller the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0044] For example, the current trend of the waste yarn approaching the texturing machine is obtained by weighting and summing the aforementioned included angle and the distance between the nearest point and the texturing machine.
[0045] For example, a linear function can be used to calculate the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine, thus obtaining the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine. For instance, F(x) = ax + b, where x represents the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine, a and b are constants, and F(x) is the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine. The greater the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine, the greater the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine.
[0046] According to the above implementation method, by utilizing the directional relationship between the trajectory of waste wire in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine from the past to the present time and the texturing machine, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be accurately determined. Thus, the current waste wire interference risk relative to the texturing machine can be determined based on the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0047] In one implementation, determining the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine includes: if the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is greater than a first distance and less than a second distance, determining the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine, wherein the first distance is less than the second distance; if the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is less than the first distance, determining the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine; if the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is greater than the second distance, determining the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the second distance.
[0048] Understandably, when waste wire is some distance from the texturing machine but not very close, directly using distance to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine may not be accurate. It is necessary to consider the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine. For example, at the same nearest point distance, i.e., the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine, for two different waste wires, the smaller the angle between the displacement direction of the waste wire and the nearest straight line direction, the greater the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine. Similarly, at the same nearest point distance, for two different waste wires, the smaller the angle between the tangent direction of the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest straight line direction, the greater the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0049] Understandably, when the waste wire is relatively close to the texturing machine, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be determined by using the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine. The closer the distance, the greater the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine. The farther the distance, the smaller the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0050] Understandably, when the waste wire is relatively far from the texturing machine, for example, greater than the second distance mentioned above, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be directly determined using the second distance. In this case, the current approach trend is a fixed value.
[0051] According to the above implementation method, different methods are used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine according to the interval of the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine. In this way, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be determined accurately and quickly.
[0052] In one implementation, determining the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine includes: determining the waste wire displacement direction based on the start and end points in the historical movement trajectory; determining the shortest straight line direction from the shortest point to the texturing machine based on the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory and the position information of the texturing machine; and determining the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the angle between the waste wire displacement direction and the shortest straight line direction.
[0053] Understandably, the direction from the starting point to the ending point in the historical movement trajectory is the direction of waste wire displacement.
[0054] Understandably, the direction from the nearest point to the loading machine in the historical movement trajectory to the loading machine is the shortest straight line direction.
[0055] For example, a function can be used to calculate the angle between the direction of waste wire displacement and the nearest straight line direction, and this value can be used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine. For instance, a function composed of a combination of linear and trigonometric functions can be used.
[0056] For example, the included angle and the distance between the nearest point and the texturing machine are respectively processed by dimension processing or normalization, and then the two processed values are weighted and summed to obtain the current trend of the waste wire approaching the texturing machine.
[0057] Understandably, the smaller the angle between the waste wire displacement direction and the nearest straight line direction, the greater the current tendency of the waste wire to approach the texturing machine, and the greater the risk of waste wire interference to the texturing machine. Conversely, the larger the angle between the waste wire displacement direction and the nearest straight line direction, the smaller the current tendency of the waste wire to approach the texturing machine, and the lower the risk of waste wire interference to the texturing machine.
[0058] Understandably, when the waste wire is a certain distance from the texturing machine, the smaller the angle between the waste wire's displacement direction and the nearest straight line direction, the easier it is for the waste wire to approach the texturing machine. In other words, the greater the probability of the waste wire approaching the texturing machine, the greater the risk of interference from the waste wire. Conversely, when the waste wire is a certain distance from the texturing machine, the larger the angle between the waste wire's displacement direction and the nearest straight line direction, the more difficult it is for the waste wire to approach the texturing machine. The smaller the probability of the waste wire approaching the texturing machine, the lower the risk of interference from the waste wire.
[0059] Understandably, if the waste wire is relatively close to the texturing machine, the aforementioned directional relationship is no longer used to determine the waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine. Instead, the distance between the waste wire and the texturing machine is used to directly determine the waste wire interference risk. If the waste wire is relatively far from the texturing machine, for example, farther than the aforementioned certain distance, a specified value can be used to determine the waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine, without the need for complex calculations, to indicate that the waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine is relatively small.
[0060] According to the above implementation method, by using the angle between the waste wire displacement direction of the historical movement trajectory of the waste wire and the nearest straight line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be accurately determined.
[0061] In one implementation, determining the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine includes: determining the tangential direction of the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory based on the position and curvature of the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory; determining the shortest straight-line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine based on the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory and the position information of the texturing machine; and determining the current approach trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the angle between the tangential direction of the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory and the shortest straight-line direction.
[0062] Understandably, the curvature of the nearest point is solved by taking the first and second derivatives, and the first derivative obtained is taken as the tangent direction.
[0063] Understandably, the direction from the nearest point to the loading machine in the historical movement trajectory to the loading machine is the shortest straight line direction.
[0064] For example, a function can be used to calculate the angle between the tangent direction and the nearest straight line direction, and this value can be used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine. For instance, a function composed of a combination of linear and trigonometric functions can be used.
[0065] For example, the included angle and the distance between the nearest point and the texturing machine are respectively processed by dimension processing or normalization, and then the two processed values are weighted and summed to obtain the current trend of the waste wire approaching the texturing machine.
[0066] Understandably, the smaller the angle between the tangent direction and the nearest straight line direction, the greater the tendency of the waste wire to approach the texturing machine, and the greater the risk of waste wire interference to the texturing machine. Conversely, the larger the angle between the tangent direction and the nearest straight line direction, the greater the tendency of the waste wire to approach the texturing machine, and the smaller the risk of waste wire interference to the texturing machine.
[0067] Understandably, when the waste wire is a certain distance from the texturing machine, the smaller the angle between the tangent direction and the nearest straight line direction, the easier it is for the waste wire to get close to the texturing machine. In other words, the greater the probability of the waste wire approaching the texturing machine, the greater the risk of interference from the waste wire. Conversely, when the waste wire is a certain distance from the texturing machine, the larger the angle between the tangent direction and the nearest straight line direction, the more difficult it is for the waste wire to get close to the texturing machine. The smaller the probability of it approaching the texturing machine, the lower the risk of interference from the waste wire.
[0068] Understandably, if the waste wire is relatively close to the texturing machine, the aforementioned directional relationship is no longer used to determine the waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine. Instead, the distance between the waste wire and the texturing machine is used to directly determine the waste wire interference risk. If the waste wire is relatively far from the texturing machine, for example, farther than the aforementioned certain distance, a specified value can be used to determine the waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine, without the need for complex calculations, to indicate that the waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine is relatively small.
[0069] According to the above implementation method, by using the angle between the tangent direction of the nearest point on the historical movement trajectory of the waste wire and the nearest straight line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be accurately determined.
[0070] In some examples, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be determined by simultaneously using the angle between the waste wire displacement direction and the nearest straight line direction, as well as the angle between the tangent direction of the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest straight line direction. The smaller these two angles are, the smaller the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine. For example, taking the minimum value of these two angles to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine avoids directly determining that the risk of waste wire interference is relatively small due to an excessively large angle. Alternatively, the average value of these two angles can be used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0071] In one implementation, such as Figure 3 As shown, the above method may further include:
[0072] S240, based on the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory, determine the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine;
[0073] S250 corrects for the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine based on the current trend of waste wire moving away from the texturing machine.
[0074] Understandably, since multiple texturing machines can operate in the same environment, the false-twisting airflow between adjacent machines can affect the trajectory of the waste yarn. Resonance between these machines can also influence the waste yarn's trajectory. Therefore, the waste yarn's trajectory may initially move towards and approach the texturing machine, but subsequently veer away due to other factors. Thus, it is necessary to assess the current trend of the waste yarn moving away from the texturing machine and use this trend to correct for the current waste yarn interference risk, resulting in a more comprehensive assessment of the current waste yarn interference risk.
[0075] For example, if the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory are not the same, the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine is determined to be a positive number based on the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, and this value is positively correlated with this distance. Conversely, if the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory are the same, the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine is determined to be zero.
[0076] like Figure 4 As shown, in trajectory A, the closest point A1 to the texturing machine is the same as the endpoint A2, and at this point, the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine is zero. After a period of time, the waste wire continues to move, forming trajectory B. In trajectory B, the closest point B1 to the texturing machine is not the same as the endpoint B2, and at this point, the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine is positive, and this positive value can be directly proportional to or positively correlated with the distance between the endpoint and the closest point.
[0077] For example, the current moving away trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be used to reduce the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine. For instance, the current moving away trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be calculated using a linear function to obtain the interference mitigation probability. Then, the interference mitigation probability is subtracted from the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine to obtain the corrected current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine.
[0078] For example, if the risk of the corrected waste wire interfering with the current waste wire of the texturing machine is greater than a preset threshold, the waste wire cleaning equipment is controlled to clean the waste wire around the texturing machine.
[0079] According to the above implementation method, in the historical trajectory of the waste wire moving towards the texturing machine, by utilizing the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical trajectory and the closest point to the texturing machine in the historical trajectory, the current moving away trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine can be accurately determined. In this way, by using the current moving away trend to correct the current waste wire interference risk determined only by the current moving closer trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine, the corrected current waste wire interference risk can be more accurate and more comprehensive.
[0080] In one implementation, determining the current moving-away trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory includes: if the endpoint and the nearest point are not in the same position, determining the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, a first straight-line direction from the nearest point to the endpoint, and the nearest straight-line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine based on the historical movement trajectory; determining the current moving-away trend of waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, and the angle between the first straight-line direction and the nearest straight-line direction, wherein the value of the current moving-away trend is a positive number.
[0081] For example, the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point is positively correlated with the current trend of moving away, and the angle between the first straight line direction and the nearest straight line direction is positively correlated with the current trend of moving away.
[0082] For example, when the endpoint and the nearest point are not the same, the greater the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, the greater the current tendency of the waste wire to move away from the texturing machine. The smaller the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, the smaller the current tendency of the waste wire to move away from the texturing machine. The larger the angle between the first straight line direction from the nearest point to the endpoint and the nearest straight line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine, the greater the current tendency of the waste wire to move away from the texturing machine; the smaller the angle between the first straight line direction from the nearest point to the endpoint and the nearest straight line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine, the greater the current tendency of the waste wire to move away from the texturing machine.
[0083] For example, the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, and the angle between the first straight line direction and the nearest straight line direction are normalized to obtain the normalized distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, and the normalized angle between the first straight line direction and the nearest straight line direction. A linear function is then used to calculate the normalized distance and the normalized angle to obtain the current trend of the waste wire moving further away from the texturing machine.
[0084] According to the above implementation method, when the endpoint and the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory of the waste wire are inconsistent, the waste wire tends to move away from the texturing machine. Therefore, the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, the first straight-line direction from the nearest point to the endpoint, and the nearest straight-line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine are determined. Then, using the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, and the angle between the first straight-line direction and the nearest straight-line direction, the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine can be accurately determined. Subsequently, the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine can be used to correct the risk of waste wire interference with the texturing machine, improving the accuracy of risk prediction.
[0085] In one embodiment, the method further includes: determining that the current moving away trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is zero when the endpoint is at the same position as the nearest point.
[0086] In this example, when the endpoint of the waste wire's historical trajectory is the same as the nearest point, the waste wire does not have a tendency to move away from the texturing machine. At this time, the current tendency of the waste wire to move away from the texturing machine is set to zero. Even if the current tendency of the waste wire to move away from the texturing machine is used to correct the risk of waste wire interference to the texturing machine, it will not affect the accuracy of the risk prediction.
[0087] In one implementation, the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine is corrected based on the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine, including: reducing the current waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine based on the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine, and obtaining the corrected current waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine.
[0088] For example, the current trend of waste wire moving away from the texturing machine can be standardized or normalized. Then, the normalized current trend of waste wire moving away from the texturing machine can be used to reduce the current waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine, thus obtaining the corrected current waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine.
[0089] For example, a linear function is used to calculate the current trend of waste wire moving away from the texturing machine to obtain the possibility of mitigation of interference. Then, the possibility of mitigation of interference is subtracted from the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine to obtain the corrected current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine.
[0090] According to the above implementation method, based on the current trend of waste yarn moving away from the texturing machine, the current waste yarn interference risk of the texturing machine is reduced, resulting in a corrected current waste yarn interference risk for the texturing machine. Thus, the corrected current waste yarn interference risk for the texturing machine considers both the current approaching and moving away trends of the waste yarn, thereby improving the accuracy of the current waste yarn interference risk for the texturing machine.
[0091] In one embodiment, the method further includes: when there are multiple waste wires in the surrounding environment, obtaining the current waste wire interference risk of each waste wire in the surrounding environment after correction to the texturing machine; determining the target waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine based on the current waste wire interference risk of each waste wire after correction to the texturing machine; and controlling the waste wire cleaning equipment to clean the waste wires in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine when the target waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine is greater than a preset threshold.
[0092] Understandably, cleaning up waste wire around the texturing machine can also include cleaning up waste wire around all texturing machines in the vicinity of the texturing machine.
[0093] For example, if the risk of interference from the target waste wire in the texturing machine exceeds a preset second risk threshold, waste wire cleaning will not be performed temporarily.
[0094] According to the above implementation method, when there are multiple waste wires in the surrounding environment, the above operation is performed on each waste wire to obtain the current waste wire interference risk of each waste wire to the texturing machine after correction. Then, the target waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine is determined from this risk. If the target waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine is greater than a preset threshold, the waste wire cleaning equipment is controlled to clean the waste wires in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine. In this way, the target waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine can be accurately calculated. The waste wire cleaning equipment is only controlled when the risk is high. This avoids frequent waste wire cleaning, which would affect the operation of the texturing machine, and also avoids the texturing machine being affected by excessive waste wire interference.
[0095] Figure 5 This is a structural block diagram of a device for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0096] like Figure 5 As shown, the device for determining the current waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine includes:
[0097] The historical trajectory determination module 510 is used to determine the historical movement trajectory of waste wire in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine based on the image sequence of the texturing working environment of the texturing machine from the past time to the current time;
[0098] The first trend determination module 520 is used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between the trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine;
[0099] Interference risk determination module 530 is used to determine the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine based on the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
[0100] In one implementation, the first trend determination module 520 includes:
[0101] The first trend calculation unit is used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between the trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine when the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is greater than a first distance and less than a second distance, wherein the first distance is less than the second distance;
[0102] The second trend calculation unit is used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the fact that the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is less than the first distance.
[0103] The third trend calculation unit is used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the second distance, when the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is greater than the second distance.
[0104] In one implementation, the first trend calculation unit is specifically used for:
[0105] The direction of waste wire displacement is determined based on the starting point and ending point in the historical movement trajectory;
[0106] Based on the nearest point to the loading machine in the historical movement trajectory, and the position information of the loading machine, the shortest straight line direction from the nearest point to the loading machine is determined;
[0107] Based on the angle between the waste wire displacement direction and the nearest straight line direction, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined.
[0108] In one implementation, the first trend calculation unit is specifically used for:
[0109] Based on the position and curvature of the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory, the tangential direction of the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory is determined;
[0110] Based on the nearest point to the loading machine in the historical movement trajectory, and the position information of the loading machine, the shortest straight line direction from the nearest point to the loading machine is determined;
[0111] Based on the angle between the tangent direction of the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest straight line direction, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined.
[0112] In one embodiment, the above-mentioned device further includes:
[0113] The second trend determination module is used to determine the current moving away trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory;
[0114] An interference risk correction module is used to correct the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine based on the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine.
[0115] In one implementation, the second trend determination module includes:
[0116] An information determination unit is used to determine, when the positions of the endpoint and the nearest point are inconsistent, the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, a first straight-line direction from the nearest point to the endpoint, and the nearest straight-line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine;
[0117] The first moving-away trend determination unit is used to determine the current moving-away trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, and the angle between the first straight line direction and the nearest straight line direction, wherein the value of the current moving-away trend is a positive number.
[0118] In one implementation, the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point is positively correlated with the current moving away trend, and the angle between the first straight line direction and the nearest straight line direction is positively correlated with the current moving away trend.
[0119] In one embodiment, the second trend determination module further includes:
[0120] The first moving-away trend determination unit is used to determine that the current moving-away trend of the waste yarn relative to the texturing machine is zero when the endpoint is at the same position as the nearest point.
[0121] In one implementation, the interference risk correction module is specifically used for:
[0122] Based on the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine, the current waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine is reduced, and the corrected current waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine is obtained.
[0123] In one embodiment, the above-mentioned device further includes:
[0124] The risk acquisition module is used to acquire the current waste wire interference risk of each of the waste wires in the surrounding environment to the texturing machine after correction, when there are multiple waste wires in the surrounding environment.
[0125] The target risk determination module is used to determine the target waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine based on the current waste wire interference risk of each of the waste wires after correction of the waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine;
[0126] The waste wire cleaning module is used to control the waste wire cleaning equipment to clean the waste wire surrounding the texturing machine when the risk of interference from the target waste wire of the texturing machine exceeds a preset threshold.
[0127] The acquisition, storage, and application of user personal information involved in the technical solution disclosed herein comply with the provisions of relevant laws and regulations and do not violate public order and good morals.
[0128] According to embodiments of this disclosure, this disclosure also provides an electronic device, a readable storage medium, and a computer program product.
[0129] Figure 6 This is a structural block diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. Figure 6 As shown, the electronic device includes a memory 610 and a processor 620. The memory 610 stores a computer program that can run on the processor 620. There can be one or more memories 610 and processors 620. The memory 610 can store one or more computer programs, which, when executed by the electronic device, cause the electronic device to perform the methods provided in the above-described method embodiments. The electronic device may also include a communication interface 630 for communicating with external devices and performing data exchange and transmission.
[0130] If the memory 610, processor 620, and communication interface 630 are implemented independently, they can be interconnected via a bus to communicate with each other. This bus can be an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, or an Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus, etc. This bus can be divided into address bus, data bus, control bus, etc. For ease of representation, Figure 6 The bus is represented by a single thick line, but this does not mean that there is only one bus or one type of bus.
[0131] Optionally, in a specific implementation, if the memory 610, processor 620, and communication interface 630 are integrated on a single chip, then the memory 610, processor 620, and communication interface 630 can communicate with each other through an internal interface.
[0132] It should be understood that the aforementioned processor can be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), or other general-purpose processors, Digital Signal Processors (DSPs), Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. General-purpose processors can be microprocessors or any conventional processor. It is worth noting that the processor can be a processor supporting Advanced Reduced Instruction Set Machines (ARM) architecture.
[0133] Further, optionally, the aforementioned memory may include read-only memory and random access memory, and may also include non-volatile random access memory. The memory may be volatile or non-volatile, or may include both. Non-volatile memory may include read-only memory (ROM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory may include random access memory (RAM), which serves as an external cache. Many forms of RAM are available by way of example, but not limitation. Examples include Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), Synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), Double Data Rate SDRAM (DDR SDRAM), Enhanced Synchronous DRAM (ESDRAM), Synchlink DRAM (SLDRAM), and Direct RAMBUS RAM (DRRAM).
[0134] In the above embodiments, implementation can be achieved, in whole or in part, through software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. When implemented in software, it can be implemented, in whole or in part, as a computer program product. The computer program product includes one or more computer instructions. When the computer instructions are loaded and executed on a computer, all or part of the processes or functions described in the embodiments of this disclosure are generated. The computer can be a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a computer network, or other programmable device. The computer instructions can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium or transmitted from one computer-readable storage medium to another. For example, the computer instructions can be transmitted from one website, computer, server, or data center to another via wired (e.g., coaxial cable, fiber optic, Digital Subscriber Line, DSL) or wireless (e.g., infrared, Bluetooth, microwave, etc.) means. The computer-readable storage medium can be any available medium accessible to a computer, or a data storage device such as a server or data center that integrates one or more available media. The available media can be magnetic media (e.g., floppy disks, hard disks, magnetic tapes), optical media (e.g., Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs)), or semiconductor media (e.g., Solid State Disks (SSDs)). It is worth noting that the computer-readable storage media mentioned in this disclosure can be non-volatile storage media; in other words, it can be non-transient storage media.
[0135] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps of the above embodiments can be implemented by hardware or by a program instructing related hardware. The program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as a read-only memory, a disk, or an optical disk.
[0136] In the description of the embodiments of this disclosure, the reference to terms such as "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "example," "specific example," or "some examples," etc., refers to a specific feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with that embodiment or example, which is included in at least one embodiment or example of this disclosure. Furthermore, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples. Moreover, without contradiction, those skilled in the art can combine and integrate the different embodiments or examples described in this specification, as well as the features of those different embodiments or examples.
[0137] In the description of the embodiments disclosed herein, unless otherwise stated, " / " means "or". For example, A / B can mean A or B. The "and / or" in this document is merely a description of the relationship between related objects, indicating that three relationships can exist. For example, A and / or B can represent: A existing alone, A and B existing simultaneously, and B existing alone.
[0138] In the description of embodiments of this disclosure, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of indicated technical features. Thus, a feature defined as "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. In the description of embodiments of this disclosure, unless otherwise stated, "a plurality of" means two or more.
[0139] The above description is merely an exemplary embodiment of this disclosure and is not intended to limit this disclosure. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of this disclosure should be included within the protection scope of this disclosure.
Claims
1. A method for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine, characterized in that, include: Based on the image sequence of the texturing working environment of the texturing machine from the past moment to the present moment, the historical movement trajectory of waste wire in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine is determined; Based on the directional relationship between the trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined; Based on the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine, the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine is determined.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Determining the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine includes: If the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is greater than a first distance and less than a second distance, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined based on the directional relationship between the trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine, wherein the first distance is less than the second distance; If the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is less than the first distance, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined based on the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine. If the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is greater than the second distance, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined based on the second distance.
3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, Determining the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine includes: The direction of waste wire displacement is determined based on the starting point and ending point in the historical movement trajectory; Based on the nearest point to the loading machine in the historical movement trajectory, and the position information of the loading machine, the shortest straight line direction from the nearest point to the loading machine is determined; Based on the angle between the waste wire displacement direction and the nearest straight line direction, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined.
4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, Determining the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine includes: Based on the position and curvature of the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory, the tangential direction of the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory is determined; Based on the nearest point to the loading machine in the historical movement trajectory, and the position information of the loading machine, the shortest straight line direction from the nearest point to the loading machine is determined; Based on the angle between the tangent direction of the nearest point in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest straight line direction, the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined.
5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Based on the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory, the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine is determined; Based on the current trend of the waste yarn moving away from the texturing machine, the risk of the waste yarn interfering with the texturing machine is corrected.
6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that, Determining the current moving trend of the waste yarn relative to the texturing machine based on the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory includes: If the endpoint and the nearest point are not at the same location, the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point is determined based on the historical movement trajectory, as well as the first straight-line direction from the nearest point to the endpoint and the nearest straight-line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine. Based on the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, and the angle between the first straight line direction and the nearest straight line direction, the current moving away trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine is determined, wherein the value of the current moving away trend is a positive number.
7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that, The distance between the endpoint and the nearest point is positively correlated with the current trend of moving away, and the angle between the first straight line direction and the nearest straight line direction is positively correlated with the current trend of moving away.
8. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that, Also includes: If the endpoint coincides with the nearest point, the current moving away trend of the waste filament relative to the texturing machine is determined to be zero.
9. The method according to claim 8, characterized in that, The method of correcting the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine based on the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine includes: Based on the current trend of the waste yarn moving away from the texturing machine, the risk of the waste yarn interfering with the current waste yarn of the texturing machine is reduced.
10. The method according to any one of claims 1-9, characterized in that, Also includes: In the case where there are multiple waste wires in the surrounding environment, the risk of interference from each of the waste wires in the surrounding environment to the current waste wire of the texturing machine is obtained; Based on the current waste wire interference risk of each of the aforementioned waste wires to the texturing machine, the target waste wire interference risk of the texturing machine is determined; If the risk of interference from the target waste filament of the texturing machine exceeds a preset threshold, the waste filament cleaning equipment is controlled to clean the waste filament in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine.
11. A device for determining the current waste wire interference risk of a texturing machine, characterized in that, include: The historical trajectory determination module is used to determine the historical movement trajectory of waste wire in the surrounding environment of the texturing machine based on the image sequence of the texturing working environment from the past moment to the current moment; The proximity trend determination module is used to determine the current proximity trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between the trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine; The interference risk determination module is used to determine the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine based on the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine.
12. The apparatus according to claim 11, characterized in that, The proximity trend determination module includes: The first trend determination unit is configured to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the directional relationship between the trajectory points in the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine when the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is greater than a first distance and less than a second distance, wherein the first distance is less than the second distance; The second trend determination unit is used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the fact that the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is less than the first distance. The third trend determination unit is used to determine the current approach trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the second distance, when the closest distance between the historical movement trajectory and the texturing machine is greater than the second distance.
13. The apparatus according to claim 11, characterized in that, Also includes: The moving-away trend determination module is used to determine the current moving-away trend of the waste wire relative to the texturing machine based on the positional relationship between the endpoint in the historical movement trajectory and the nearest point to the texturing machine in the historical movement trajectory; An interference risk correction module is used to correct the current waste wire interference risk to the texturing machine based on the current trend of the waste wire moving away from the texturing machine.
14. The apparatus according to claim 13, characterized in that, The trend determination module includes: An information determination unit is used to determine, when the positions of the endpoint and the nearest point are inconsistent, the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, a first straight-line direction from the nearest point to the endpoint, and the nearest straight-line direction from the nearest point to the texturing machine; The moving-away trend determination unit is used to determine the current moving-away trend of the waste yarn relative to the texturing machine based on the distance between the endpoint and the nearest point, and the angle between the first straight line direction and the nearest straight line direction, wherein the value of the current moving-away trend is a positive number.
15. An electronic device comprising: At least one processor; as well as A memory that is communicatively connected to the at least one processor; The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor, which, when executed by the at least one processor, enables the at least one processor to perform the method according to any one of claims 1-10.
16. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, wherein, The computer instructions are used to cause the computer to perform the method according to any one of claims 1-10.