Cyclic packaging safety supervision method and system for bulk goods

By acquiring the identification and historical records of reusable packaging, we can determine its compatibility with current goods, prevent incompatible use, solve the problems of cross-contamination and safety hazards caused by the alternating use of reusable packaging, and achieve food safety and supply chain reliability.

CN121481007APending Publication Date: 2026-02-06SHANGHAI HONGYAN RETURNABLE TRANSIT PACKAGINGS CO LTD
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202411014634.2
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2024-07-26
Publication Date
2026-02-06

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

The alternating use of reusable packaging between different types of goods may lead to cross-contamination and safety hazards, affecting food safety and quality.

Method used

By obtaining the packaging identifier of the reusable packaging, determining its category and usage history, and matching it with the current category and user category of the bulk goods, an authentication failure message is output to prevent incompatible use.

Benefits of technology

Effectively prevent cross-contamination between different types of goods, ensure food safety and quality, optimize resource allocation, and enhance supply chain transparency and traceability.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN121481007A_ABST
    Figure CN121481007A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention relates to the field of logistics, discloses a circulation packaging safety supervision method and system for bulk goods, and can effectively solve the problems of cross contamination and potential safety hazards possibly caused when circulation packaging is alternately used among different types of goods. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring a package identifier of a circulating package; according to the package identifier, obtaining a package type and a use historical record of the circulating package; judging whether first information corresponding to the category of the current bulk cargo is matched with the packaging category or not, and / or whether a record conflicting with the first information exists in a use history record or not; and in response to the fact that the first information is not matched with the package type, or records conflicting with the first information exist in the use history records, outputting information representing authentication failure.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the logistics field, and in particular to safety monitoring technologies for reusable packaging that may be associated with bulk food. Background Technology

[0002] This section is intended to provide background or context for understanding the implementation of this application and is for reference only. It should not be construed as an admission by the applicant that this section pertains to prior art that was disclosed before the filing date of this application.

[0003] Reusable packaging is a type of packaging container used for the transport and storage of bulk goods, designed to reduce waste, increase efficiency, and lower long-term costs. Common examples of reusable packaging include:

[0004] Medium Bulk Containers (IBCs): These sturdy plastic or metal containers are typically used for transporting and storing liquid, granular, or powdery materials.

[0005] Collapsible bulk containers: designed for easy return of empty containers, improving logistics efficiency.

[0006] Reusable bulk bags (FIBC): also known as ton bags, are suitable for transporting materials such as powders and granules.

[0007] Reusable packaging is widely used in various industries such as food, chemicals, and agriculture. It is not only environmentally friendly but also helps companies improve logistics efficiency and ensure product quality and safety. By using these reusable packages, companies can significantly reduce their use of single-use packaging materials while improving the sustainability of the entire supply chain.

[0008] However, alternating the use of reusable packaging between different types of goods, such as using the same reusable packaging to transport liquid chemical raw materials and then edible oil, can lead to extremely serious consequences:

[0009] Cross-contamination: For example, residues from chemical raw materials may contaminate cooking oil, leading to food safety issues. Even after washing, trace amounts of chemicals may still remain.

[0010] Health hazards: For example, contaminated cooking oil may contain toxic substances, which may lead to acute poisoning or long-term health problems if consumed.

[0011] Food quality decline: For example, chemical residues may alter the taste, color, or texture of cooking oil.

[0012] This affects its quality.

[0013] Therefore, it is crucial to strictly differentiate and manage the use of reusable packaging to ensure food safety and consumer health. Summary of the Invention

[0014] The purpose of this application is to provide a method and system for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods, which can effectively solve the cross-contamination and safety hazards that may occur when reusable packaging is used alternately between different types of goods.

[0015] This application discloses a method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods, including:

[0016] Obtain the packaging label for reusable packaging;

[0017] The packaging category and usage history of the reusable packaging are obtained based on the packaging identification.

[0018] Determine whether the first information corresponding to the category of the current bulk goods matches the packaging category, and / or whether there are any records in the usage history that conflict with the first information;

[0019] In response to a mismatch between the first information and the packaging category, or a conflicting record in the usage history, an authentication failure message is output.

[0020] In a preferred embodiment, the first information is the category of the current bulk cargo;

[0021] The usage history includes the categories of bulk goods that the reusable packaging has previously shipped;

[0022] If the category of at least one previously shipped bulk cargo in the usage history conflicts with the category of the current bulk cargo, then the usage history is determined to contain a record that conflicts with the category of the current bulk cargo.

[0023] In a preferred embodiment, the first information is the user category of the current bulk cargo;

[0024] The usage history includes the user categories of bulk goods that the reusable packaging has previously shipped;

[0025] If the user category of at least one previously shipped bulk cargo in the usage history conflicts with the user category of the current bulk cargo, then it is determined that the usage history contains a record that conflicts with the category of the current bulk cargo.

[0026] In a preferred embodiment, the user category includes one or any combination of the following:

[0027] The categories of producers of the bulk cargo, consignors of the bulk cargo, consignees of the bulk cargo, and carriers of the bulk cargo.

[0028] In a preferred embodiment, the bulk cargo is one of the following: bulk liquid, bulk paste, solid particulate matter, solid powder, or fibrous material.

[0029] In a preferred embodiment, the reusable packaging includes an inner bag for accommodating bulk goods, and the method further includes:

[0030] Obtain the inner bag identifier of the inner bag;

[0031] The inner bag type is obtained based on the inner bag identifier;

[0032] Determine whether the type of inner bag matches the type of the current bulk cargo;

[0033] In response to the inner bag type not matching the current bulk cargo type, an authentication failure message is output.

[0034] This application also discloses a method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods, wherein the current bulk goods are bulk goods to be loaded into the reusable packaging; and the reusable packaging is empty;

[0035] Before loading the current bulk cargo into the recycle packaging, the method described above is performed.

[0036] This application also discloses a method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods, wherein the current bulk goods are the bulk goods currently contained in the reusable packaging;

[0037] Before accepting the cyclic package, perform the method as described above.

[0038] This application also discloses a safety monitoring system for reusable packaging of bulk goods, including:

[0039] A label reading device for acquiring packaging labels of reusable packaging;

[0040] A data query device is used to obtain the packaging category and usage history of the reusable packaging based on the packaging identifier;

[0041] The verification device is used to determine whether the first information corresponding to the current bulk cargo category matches the packaging category, and / or whether there is a record in the usage history that conflicts with the first information; and, in response to the first information not matching the packaging category or the existence of a record in the usage history that conflicts with the first information, outputs information indicating authentication failure.

[0042] This application also discloses a computer program product including computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, implement the steps in the method described above.

[0043] In the embodiments of this application, by comparing packaging categories, cargo categories, and usage history, cross-use between different types of goods can be more accurately identified and prevented. For example, it ensures that packaging previously used for chemicals is not mistakenly used for food transportation, thereby reducing the risk of food quality degradation.

[0044] Furthermore, by comparing packaging categories, user categories, and usage history, the use of reusable packaging can be managed according to the needs of different user categories, avoiding potential cross-contamination and safety hazards that may result from the alternating use of reusable packaging by different user categories. For example, it ensures that reusable packaging previously used for transporting goods in the chemical supply chain is not used for transporting goods in the food supply chain.

[0045] Furthermore, implementing safety oversight procedures on reusable packaging before loading goods ensures that the packaging meets safety standards before being used with new goods. Pre-inspection ensures that the packaging will not cause cross-contamination of new goods due to contaminants left from previous use.

[0046] Furthermore, implementing safety supervision procedures on reusable packaging before receiving goods can promptly identify reusable packaging that has been used unsafely and the goods it carries, thereby allowing for the timely rejection of problematic goods.

[0047] By implementing the security monitoring steps proposed in this application at every stage of the supply chain, including loading and receiving, the consistency and security of reusable packaging throughout the entire logistics process can be ensured. This end-to-end monitoring not only effectively prevents potential cross-contamination but also ensures the integrity and compliance of goods during transportation and storage. By continuously tracking and recording the usage history of reusable packaging and cargo information, companies can monitor packaging status in real time and respond quickly to any potential security issues.

[0048] Furthermore, the proposed solution helps companies optimize resource allocation, reduce cargo loss and liability risks caused by improper use of reusable packaging, and enhance supply chain transparency and traceability. In today's world, where consumers are increasingly focused on product safety and environmental protection, implementing such high-standard safety regulations not only enhances the reputation and market competitiveness of companies but also contributes to the sustainable development of the entire industry.

[0049] The various technical features disclosed in the above-described invention, the various technical features disclosed in the following embodiments and examples, and the various technical features disclosed in the accompanying drawings can be freely combined to form various new technical solutions (all of which should be considered as having been recorded in this specification), unless such a combination of technical features is technically infeasible. For example, in one example, feature A+B+C is disclosed, and in another example, feature A+B+D+E is disclosed. Features C and D are equivalent technical means that serve the same function, and technically only one needs to be used; it is impossible to use both simultaneously. Feature E can be technically combined with feature C. Therefore, the solution A+B+C+D should not be considered as having been recorded because it is technically infeasible, while the solution A+B+C+E should be considered as having been recorded. Attached Figure Description

[0050] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of a method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods according to the first embodiment of this application;

[0051] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a method for safety supervision of recirculating packaging of bulk liquids according to the second embodiment of this application;

[0052] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of a safety monitoring system for reusable packaging of bulk goods according to the third embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0053] In the following description, many technical details are presented to help the reader better understand this application. However, those skilled in the art will understand that the technical solutions claimed in this application can be implemented even without these technical details and various variations and modifications based on the following embodiments.

[0054] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this application clearer, the embodiments of this application will be described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0055] In some embodiments of this application, bulk cargo may be bulk liquid, bulk paste, solid particulate matter, solid powder, fibrous material, etc.

[0056] The first embodiment of this application relates to a method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods, the process of which is as follows: Figure 1 As shown, the method includes the following steps:

[0057] In step 101, the packaging identification of the reusable packaging is obtained. This can be achieved through various methods, such as using a camera to photograph the QR code on the surface of the reusable packaging, using a barcode scanner to scan the barcode on the surface of the reusable packaging, using an RFID reader to read the RFID tag embedded in the reusable packaging, or using NFC (Near Field Communication) technology to obtain data from smart devices near the surface of the reusable packaging, and so on. These technologies automate, speed up, and accurately obtain the reusable packaging identification, greatly improving logistics efficiency.

[0058] Next, proceed to step 102, where the reusable packaging category and usage history are obtained based on the reusable packaging identifier. Step 102 can be implemented in several ways:

[0059] Database Query: After obtaining the unique identifier of the reusable packaging, the system can retrieve the relevant reusable packaging category and detailed shipping history through database queries. For example, the system can connect to a central database that records information such as the specifications of all reusable packaging, the type of goods previously loaded, the date of use, and the shipping route.

[0060] Cloud service access: For smart devices connected to the internet, cloud services can be used to retrieve and update the historical records and categories of reusable packaging. Once a reusable packaging label is identified, the system can instantly retrieve the latest data from the cloud, ensuring the timeliness and accuracy of the information.

[0061] Blockchain technology: Leveraging the immutability of blockchain technology, the authenticity and security of usage history can be guaranteed. Each time a package is used and scanned, relevant information is recorded on the blockchain. Subsequent queries can trace back to the complete historical record, ensuring data transparency and tamper-proofness.

[0062] Then proceed to step 103, which determines whether the first information corresponding to the current bulk cargo category matches the reusable packaging category, and / or whether there are any records in the history that conflict with the first information. If the first information does not match the reusable packaging category, or if there are any records in the history that conflict with the first information, proceed to step 105 and output a message indicating authentication failure; otherwise, proceed to step 104 and output a message indicating authentication success.

[0063] Optionally, in one embodiment, the first information is the current category of bulk cargo, and the usage history includes the categories of bulk cargo that have been previously shipped in cyclic packaging. In step 103, if at least one category of bulk cargo that has been shipped in the usage history conflicts with the category of the current bulk cargo, it is determined that there is a conflicting record in the usage history for the current bulk cargo category. Below are some examples of cargo category conflicts:

[0064] Food and Chemical Conflict: Suppose the package is intended to be used to transport edible flour, but its usage history shows it was previously used to transport industrial cleaning agents. In this case, chemical residues could contaminate the food, causing serious food safety issues.

[0065] Allergen conflicts between different agricultural products: If recycled packaging was previously used to transport peanuts and is now used to load wheat, even trace amounts of peanut residue can trigger severe allergic reactions in consumers with peanut allergies.

[0066] Conflict between pharmaceutical products and ordinary commodities: Suppose that reusable packaging was once used to transport pharmaceutical raw materials, and now it is to be used to transport food additives. Drug residues may affect the quality and safety of the food additives.

[0067] Conflict between organic and conventional agricultural products: If repackaged produce previously used for transporting conventionally grown fruit treated with pesticides is now intended for transporting certified organic vegetables, this could lead to the organic products being contaminated with pesticide residues and losing their organic certification.

[0068] Conflicts between different hazardous materials: Suppose that the reusable packaging was previously used to transport low-level flammable liquids, but is now to be used to transport high-level corrosive substances. Chemical reactions may occur between different hazardous materials, increasing safety risks.

[0069] Conflict between animal feed and human food: If repackaged animal feed was previously used for transportation,

[0070] This material is now intended for transporting human food. This could raise hygiene concerns and the risk of cross-contamination. Contamination conflicts between different metals or alloys: Suppose reusable packaging was previously used to transport copper powder, and now it is to be used to transport aluminum powder. Even trace amounts of copper contamination can significantly affect the purity and properties of the aluminum.

[0071] Conflict between GMO and non-GMO products: If recycled packaging was previously used to transport GMO soybeans, and is now intended to be used to transport non-GMO soybeans, this could lead to contamination of the non-GMO products, causing them to lose their market value.

[0072] Flavor clashes between different spices or seasonings: Suppose that reusable packaging was once used to transport strong spices such as curry powder, and is now to transport more refined seasonings such as herb powder. Residual spices may alter the flavor characteristics of the new product.

[0073] Conflict between radioactive materials and ordinary cargo: If reusable packaging was previously used to transport low-level radioactive medical waste and is now intended to transport ordinary industrial raw materials, there may be a risk of residual radiation, even after decontamination treatment.

[0074] The conflict between halal and non-halal foods.

[0075] These examples demonstrate that determining conflicts between bulk cargo categories involves not only product quality but also food safety, health risks, environmental protection, religious and regulatory compliance, and many other aspects. Therefore, rigorously inspecting and managing usage history during the use of reusable packaging to prevent cross-contamination of incompatible goods is a crucial step in ensuring the safety and efficiency of the entire supply chain.

[0076] Optionally, in one embodiment, the first information is the user category of the current bulk cargo; the usage history includes user categories of bulk cargoes that have been cyclically packaged and shipped. In step 103, if the user category of at least one previously shipped bulk cargo in the usage history conflicts with the user category of the current bulk cargo, it is determined that there is a conflicting record in the usage history for the current bulk cargo category. The user category can be: the category of the bulk cargo producer, the category of the bulk cargo shipper, the category of the bulk cargo consignee, the category of the bulk cargo carrier, etc. Below are some examples of user category conflicts:

[0077] Producer Category Conflict: Suppose the current bulk shipment contains certified organic soybeans, with the producer category being "Organic Farm." However, usage history shows that this reusable packaging was previously used to transport soybeans produced on conventional farms. In this case, the organic producer may refuse to use the reusable packaging.

[0078] To prevent organic products from being contaminated by conventional agricultural products.

[0079] Shipper Category Conflict: The current shipper of the bulk cargo is a wholesaler specializing in high-end food products, while usage history shows that the reusable packaging was previously used by an industrial raw material supplier. This could raise concerns about food safety and quality control.

[0080] Conflicting consignee categories: If the current consignee of the bulk cargo is a pharmaceutical company that requires raw materials with extremely high purity, but the usage history indicates that the reusable packaging was previously used to transport fertilizer to agricultural enterprises, the pharmaceutical company may refuse to accept the shipment due to the risk of cross-contamination.

[0081] Carrier category conflict: The current bulk cargo requires handling by a carrier with dangerous goods transport qualifications, but usage history shows that the reusable packaging was previously used by a general logistics company. This may violate dangerous goods transport regulations and increase safety risks.

[0082] Conflict in producer and consignee category combinations: Suppose the producer of the current bulk shipment is a halal-certified food company, and the consignee is a halal food distributor. However, usage history shows that this reusable packaging has previously been used to transport non-halal-certified meat products. This would violate regulations for the production and distribution of halal food.

[0083] Conflicting combination of producer and shipper categories: If the current producer of bulk cargo is a pharmaceutical company and the shipper is a medical device wholesaler, but usage history shows that the reusable packaging was previously used to transport industrial chemicals, this situation may violate hygiene standards for pharmaceuticals and medical devices.

[0084] Cross-industry user category conflict: Suppose that the current bulk cargo involves various user categories in the food industry (producers, shippers, consignees, carriers), but usage history shows that the same reusable packaging was previously used in the chemical industry supply chain. This cross-industry use could raise serious safety and compliance issues.

[0085] These examples illustrate that user category conflicts not only involve product safety and quality issues, but may also relate to industry standards, religious beliefs, trade secret protection, and supply chain security. By strictly controlling the usage history of reusable packaging and conducting user category matching checks before use, potential conflicts can be effectively prevented, ensuring the safety and compliance of bulk cargo transportation.

[0086] Optionally, in one embodiment, the current bulk cargo is the bulk cargo to be loaded into a reusable package; the reusable package is empty. Steps 101-105 are performed before loading the current bulk cargo into the reusable package.

[0087] A report can be generated with one click. Here is a specific example of an authentication failure:

[0088] 1. Step 101: Obtain the reusable packaging identifier for reusable packaging.

[0089] The operator clicked the "Inspect" button and used the camera on the handheld terminal to scan the QR code on the reusable packaging. The scan result showed that the reusable packaging was identified as "0PKG-2024-07-24-002".

[0090] 2. Step 102: Obtain the reusable packaging category and usage history.

[0091] The system queries the central database based on the reusable packaging identifier "PKG-2024-07-24-002" and retrieves the following information:

[0092] Recyclable Packaging Category: Recyclable Packaging for Chemicals

[0093] Usage history:

[0094] Most recent shipment: Industrial-grade sulfuric acid compound powder

[0095] Manufacturer: Chemical Raw Materials Co., Ltd.

[0096] Shipper: Chemical wholesaler

[0097] Consignee: Battery manufacturer

[0098] Carrier: Dangerous Goods Logistics Company

[0099] 3. Step 103: Determine the matching between the current bulk cargo and the history of reusable packaging.

[0100] Assume the following information is available for the bulk cargo to be loaded:

[0101] Product Name: High Purity Wheat Flour

[0102] Goods category: Food ingredients

[0103] Producer: Jinmai Flour Mill

[0104] Shipper: High-quality grain supplier

[0105] Recipient: High-end Bakery

[0106] Carrier: Food Logistics Line

[0107] The system performs the following checks:

[0108] a) Recycling package category matching check: Failed (Current goods are food, but the recycling package is for chemicals).

[0109] b) Cargo Category Conflict Check: Serious Conflict (Previously transported industrial-grade sulfuric acid compounds pose a serious safety hazard to the current food ingredients)

[0110] c) User category matching check:

[0111] - Producer category mismatch (chemical raw material company vs. flour mill)

[0112] -Shipper category mismatch (chemical wholesaler vs. food supplier)

[0113] - Recipient category mismatch (battery manufacturer vs. bakery)

[0114] -Mismatched carrier categories and serious risks (dangerous goods logistics vs. food logistics)

[0115] 4. Steps 104-105: Generate a security risk report

[0116] The system generates the following security risk report based on the inspection results and displays it to the operator.

[0117] ***Security Risk Report***

[0118] Generation time: ****

[0119] Recyclable Packaging ID: PKG-2024-07-24-002

[0120] Current goods: High-purity wheat flour (Category: Food ingredient)

[0121] Producer: Jinmai Flour Mill

[0122] Shipper: High-quality grain supplier

[0123] Recipient: High-end Bakery

[0124] Carrier: Food Logistics Line

[0125] The following serious security risks have been detected:

[0126] 1) Serious mismatch in reusable packaging category: The current goods are food ingredients, but the reusable packaging is for chemicals. This violates basic food safety regulations.

[0127] 2) There is a serious conflict in the cargo categories: the reusable packaging was previously used to transport industrial-grade sulfuric acid compounds, which poses an unacceptable risk of contamination with food ingredients.

[0128] 3) User category mismatch, specifically:

[0129] - The producer changed from a chemical raw material company to a food producer, which completely changed the nature of the industry.

[0130] - The consignee changed from an industrial user (battery manufacturer) to a food processing plant (bread mill), and the purpose is completely different.

[0131] 4) Change of carrier involves safety risks: changing from a professional dangerous goods logistics to a food logistics line may result in a lack of professional handling capabilities for chemical residues.

[0132] Conclusion: Certification failed. This reusable packaging is strictly prohibited for loading food ingredients.

[0133] The following emergency measures are recommended:

[0134] - Immediately isolate the reusable packaging to prevent misuse.

[0135] - Report this safety hazard to the relevant regulatory authorities.

[0136] - Conduct a thorough inspection of all similar reusable packaging to ensure that no cross-use has occurred.

[0137] - Review and strengthen the reusable packaging management process to prevent similar incidents from happening again.

[0138] - Consider scrapping the reusable packaging, or, after professional harmless treatment, using it only in non-food sectors.

[0139] 5. System Response

[0140] - The system automatically locks the usage rights of this revolving package to prevent accidental operation.

[0141] - Send an urgent notification to site management personnel and quality control departments.

[0142] - Mark the reusable package as "unavailable - safety risk" in the logistics management system.

[0143] - The emergency response plan was activated, requiring manual review and processing.

[0144] This example demonstrates how a safety monitoring system can effectively identify and prevent potentially serious safety hazards even in extreme situations. By promptly detecting incompatibilities between recycled chemical packaging and food ingredients, the system effectively prevented operational errors that could have led to serious food safety issues. This rigorous safety inspection mechanism is crucial for protecting public health, adhering to regulatory requirements, and safeguarding corporate reputation.

[0145] Optionally, in one embodiment, the current bulk cargo is the bulk cargo already contained in the reusable packaging. Steps 101-105 are performed before accepting the reusable packaging. An example is as follows:

[0146] 1. Step 101: Obtain the reusable packaging identifier for reusable packaging.

[0147] The receiving staff used a handheld scanner to scan the NFC tag on the newly arrived reusable packaging. The scan result showed that the reusable packaging was identified as "LIQ-2024-07-24-003". The receiving staff then pressed the "Verify" button.

[0148] 2. Step 102: Obtain the reusable packaging category and usage history.

[0149] The system queries the cloud database based on the reusable packaging identifier "LIQ-2024-07-24-003" and obtains the following information:

[0150] Recyclable packaging category: Stainless steel cans specifically for edible oil

[0151] Usage history:

[0152] There have been two recent shipments: organic olive oil (organic food category).

[0153] 3. Step 103: Determine the matching between the current bulk cargo and the history of reusable packaging.

[0154] The currently received information regarding bulk liquids is as follows:

[0155] Product Name: Refined Sunflower Seed Oil

[0156] Category of goods: ordinary cooking oil

[0157] The system performs the following checks:

[0158] a) Recycling packaging category matching check: Passed (Current goods are edible oil, recycling packaging is for edible oil only)

[0159] b) Cargo category conflict check: Potential risk (previously transported organic food, now transported conventional food).

[0160] 4. Steps 104-105: Generate a security risk report

[0161] Based on the inspection results, the system generates the following security risk report:

[0162] ***Security Risk Report***

[0163] Generation time: ****

[0164] Recyclable Packaging ID: LIQ-2024-07-24-003

[0165] Current Goods: Refined Sunflower Seed Oil (Category: General Edible Oil)

[0166] Examination results:

[0167] Recycled packaging category matching: Warning, manual confirmation required.

[0168] - Both the current cargo and reusable packaging are suitable for edible oils and meet basic safety requirements. However, the cargo category and the reusable packaging category do not completely match.

[0169] Last shipment: Organic olive oil (Organic food category)

[0170] This shipment: Refined sunflower seed oil (general food category)

[0171] Warning:

[0172] The use of reusable packaging has been detected to shift from organic to conventional food products. This shift may pose the following potential risks:

[0173] Organic certification integrity: This reusable packaging may no longer meet the stringent requirements for transporting organic food in the future.

[0174] Residue issues: Ordinary food products may leave non-organic residues in reusable packaging.

[0175] Regulatory compliance: Organic food regulations in some regions may prohibit the reuse of such reusable packaging for organic products.

[0176] Recommended measures:

[0177] Carefully inspect and record the current quality status of the goods to ensure that they have not been adversely affected.

[0178] Thoroughly clean and disinfect the reusable packaging to remove any possible residue.

[0179] The system will mark that the reusable packaging has been used for regular food products for future tracking.

[0180] The relevant departments have been notified that this type of reusable packaging may no longer be suitable for transporting organic food.

[0181] Consider using this reusable packaging specifically for transporting regular food, or subjecting it to special processing before reusing it for organic food.

[0182] in conclusion:

[0183] After manual confirmation, the current goods can be received and used, but please note the restrictions on the future use of reusable packaging.

[0184] It is recommended that the relevant departments of the company assess whether it is necessary to adjust the future use plan for this reusable packaging, especially in the area of ​​organic food transportation.

[0185] Follow-up actions:

[0186] Please have the quality control department conduct additional sampling inspections to ensure that the quality of the goods has not been affected.

[0187] It is recommended that the logistics department review and potentially update its policies on the classification and use of reusable packaging.

[0188] The purchasing department is reminded to pay special attention to specifying the use of specially certified organic reusable packaging when ordering organic food in the future.

[0189] 5. One-click operation process

[0190] The entire process is achieved through a "one-click" operation via an integrated system:

[0191] a) The receiving personnel scan the NFC tag on the reusable packaging.

[0192] b) The system automatically queries the database to obtain cyclic packaging information and historical records.

[0193] c) The operator confirms the current cargo information (refined sunflower seed oil).

[0194] d) The system automatically performs matching analysis and risk assessment.

[0195] e) Generate a safety risk report and display the results on the terminal device. In this example, because the type of goods and the type of reusable packaging do not match perfectly, manual confirmation by the operator is required before approval.

[0196] f) The system automatically sends the report to the relevant departments and updates the reusable packaging usage record. The second embodiment of this application relates to a method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk liquids, wherein the reusable packaging is internally configured with an inner bag for containing the bulk liquid. The inner bag is typically for single use, but can be reused multiple times in certain scenarios. The basic steps of the second embodiment are similar to those of the first embodiment, except for the priority steps related to the inner bag (such as...). Figure 2 (As shown) includes:

[0197] In step 201, the reusable packaging identifier and the inner bag identifier of the inner bag are obtained.

[0198] Then proceed to step 202, where the reusable packaging category and usage history are obtained based on the reusable packaging identifier, and the inner bag type is obtained based on the inner bag identifier.

[0199] Then proceed to step 203, which determines whether the second information corresponding to the current bulk liquid category matches the recycle packaging category, whether there are any records in the usage history that conflict with the second information, and whether the inner bag type matches the current bulk liquid type.

[0200] If the second information does not match the reusable packaging category, or if there is a record in the usage history that conflicts with the second information, or if the inner bag type does not match the current bulk liquid type, then proceed to step 205 and output a message indicating authentication failure; otherwise, proceed to step 204 and output a message indicating authentication success.

[0201] A specific example is as follows:

[0202] 1. Step 201: Obtain the reusable packaging label and the inner bag label of the reusable packaging.

[0203] The operator used a handheld scanner to scan the barcode on the collapsible turnover box and obtained the reusable packaging identification as "FBOX-2024-08-15-001".

[0204] Then, the operator scans the barcode on the new disposable inner bag and obtains the inner bag identification as "DBAG-2024-08-15-A001".

[0205] 2. Step 202: Obtain reusable packaging information and inner bag type

[0206] The system queries the database based on the barcode information obtained from the scan and obtains the following information:

[0207] - Type of turnover box: Food-grade collapsible liquid turnover box

[0208] -Takeout container usage history: Last shipment contained coconut water.

[0209] - New inner bag type: Suitable for low-acid liquid foods (pH 5.0-7.0)

[0210] 3. Step 203: Determine the matching ability

[0211] The information on the bulk liquids currently awaiting loading is as follows:

[0212] -Product Name: Pasteurized Orange Juice

[0213] - Goods category: Acidic fruit juice beverages (pH approximately 4)

[0214] The system performs the following checks:

[0215] a) Container type matching check: Passed (Current goods are liquid food, container is a food-grade liquid container)

[0216] b) Use historical conflict check: Passed (no obvious conflict between previously transported coconut water and current orange juice)

[0217] c) New inner bag type matching check: Failed (the inner bag is suitable for low-acid liquid foods, while orange juice is an acidic beverage).

[0218] 4. Step 204: Output authentication failure information

[0219] The system generates the following warning report:

[0220] ***Security Risk Warning Report***

[0221] Generation time: ****

[0222] Turnover box barcode: FBOX-2024-08-15-001

[0223] Inner bag barcode: DBAG-2024-08-15-A001

[0224] Current cargo awaiting loading: Pasteurized orange juice (Category: Acidic fruit juice beverage)

[0225] Warning: Authentication failed - Inner bag type mismatch

[0226] Detailed information:

[0227] 1) Matching the type of turnover box: through

[0228] 2) Use history conflict checking: via

[0229] 3) New inner bag type match: Failed

[0230] - Current inner bag type: Suitable for low-acid liquid foods (pH 5.0-7.0)

[0231] - pH value of goods to be loaded: approximately 4 (outside the applicable range of the inner bag)

[0232] Risk Description:

[0233] Using an unsuitable type of inner bag to hold acidic juice may cause the following problems:

[0234] The inner bag material may not be able to effectively resist acid corrosion, affecting product quality and shelf life.

[0235] There is a risk of damage or leakage to the inner bag, which may result in loss and contamination of the goods.

[0236] Failure to comply with food safety regulations may result in compliance risks.

[0237] Necessary steps:

[0238] 1) Immediately stop the loading process.

[0239] 2) Mark the inner bag as "Not Applicable - pH Mismatch" in the system.

[0240] 3) Inform warehouse management personnel to provide suitable inner bags for acidic beverages.

[0241] 4) After using new inner bags suitable for acidic beverages, repeat the safety inspection process.

[0242] Recommended follow-up actions:

[0243] 1) Check and update the inner bag inventory classification to ensure there are enough inner bags suitable for various pH ranges.

[0244] 2) Strengthen training for operators on the application scope of different types of inner bags.

[0245] 3) Consider adding a rapid pH test step before loading to ensure the correct inner bag is used.

[0246] 4) Update the logistics management system to add an automatic matching function between the pH range of the inner bag and the pH value of the goods.

[0247] 5. System Response

[0248] - Automatically locks the loading task for this batch, awaiting replacement of suitable inner bags.

[0249] - Send an urgent notification to the site supervisor and quality control department

[0250] - Mark the inner bag as "Not Applicable - Pending Return" in the warehouse management system.

[0251] - Generate a new inner bag requisition request, specifying the type of inner bag suitable for acidic beverages.

[0252] The third embodiment of this application relates to a safety monitoring system for reusable packaging of bulk goods, the structure of which is as follows: Figure 3 As shown, the system includes:

[0253] A tag reader is used to acquire the reusable packaging tags of reusable packaging. The reader can be a mobile phone with a camera, a barcode scanner, an RFID reader, an NFC reader, etc.

[0254] A data query device is used to retrieve the reusable packaging category and usage history of reusable packaging based on its identification markings. The data query device can be a handheld terminal, laptop, tablet, cloud server, etc.

[0255] The verification device is used to determine whether the first information corresponding to the current bulk cargo category matches the reusable packaging category, and / or whether there are any records in the usage history that conflict with the first information. In response to a mismatch between the first information and the reusable packaging category, or the presence of a conflicting record in the usage history, the device outputs a message indicating authentication failure. The verification device can be a handheld terminal, a laptop, a tablet, a cloud server, etc.

[0256] The first embodiment is a method embodiment corresponding to this embodiment. The technical details in the first embodiment can be applied to this embodiment, and the technical details in this embodiment can also be applied to the first embodiment.

[0257] Accordingly, embodiments of this application also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions, which, when executed by a processor, implement the various method embodiments of this application. Computer-readable storage media include permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable media, and information storage can be implemented by any method or technology. Information can be computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase-change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technologies, CD-ROM, digital versatile optical disc (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic tape, disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transfer medium that can be used to store information accessible by a computing device. As defined herein, computer-readable storage media do not include transient computer-readable media, such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.

[0258] Furthermore, embodiments of this application also provide a safety monitoring system for the reusable packaging of bulk goods, including a memory for storing computer-executable instructions and a processor; the processor is used to implement the steps in the above-described method embodiments when executing the computer-executable instructions in the memory. The processor may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), Digital Signal Processor (DSP), Microcontroller Unit (MCU), Neural Processing Unit (NPU), Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), or other programmable logic devices. The aforementioned memory may be read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), flash memory, hard disk, or solid-state drive, etc. The steps of the methods disclosed in the embodiments of this invention can be directly implemented by a hardware processor, or implemented by a combination of hardware and software modules in the processor.

[0259] Furthermore, embodiments of this application also provide a computer program product, including computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, implement the steps in the above-described method embodiments.

[0260] It should be noted that in this application, relational terms such as "first" and "second" are used merely to distinguish one entity or operation from another, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Furthermore, the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one" does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that includes said element. In this application, if it refers to performing an action according to an element, it means performing the action at least according to that element, including two cases: performing the action only according to that element, and performing the action according to that element and other elements. Expressions such as "multiple," "repeatedly," and "various" include two, two times, two kinds, and more than two, more than two times, and more than two kinds.

[0261] The numbering used in describing the steps of a method does not inherently limit the order of these steps. For example, a step with a higher number does not necessarily have to be executed after a step with a lower number; it can be executed first and then second, or even in parallel, as long as this execution order is reasonable to someone skilled in the art. Similarly, multiple steps with consecutively numbered sequences (e.g., step 101, step 102, step 103, etc.) do not restrict other steps from being executed between them; for example, there can be other steps between step 101 and step 102.

[0262] This specification includes combinations of various embodiments described herein. Individual references to embodiments are made (e.g., "one embodiment," "some embodiments," or "preferred embodiments"); however, these embodiments are not mutually exclusive unless indicated to be mutually exclusive or are readily apparent to those skilled in the art. It should be noted that the word "or" is used in a non-exclusive sense throughout this specification unless the context explicitly indicates or requires it.

[0263] All references to this specification are considered to be incorporated integrally into the disclosure of this application so that they can serve as the basis for modifications if necessary. Furthermore, it should be understood that the above descriptions are merely preferred embodiments of this specification and are not intended to limit the scope of protection of this specification. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of one or more embodiments of this specification should be included within the scope of protection of one or more embodiments of this specification.

[0264] In some cases, the actions or steps described in the claims can be performed in a different order than that shown in the embodiments and still achieve the desired result. Furthermore, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require a specific or sequential order to achieve the desired result. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

Claims

1. A method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods, characterized in that, include: Obtain the packaging label for reusable packaging; The packaging category and usage history of the reusable packaging are obtained based on the packaging identification. Determine whether the first information corresponding to the category of the current bulk goods matches the packaging category, and / or whether there are any records in the usage history that conflict with the first information; In response to a mismatch between the first information and the packaging category, or a conflicting record in the usage history, an authentication failure message is output.

2. The method for safety supervision of reusable packaging of bulk goods as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The first piece of information is the category of the current bulk cargo; The usage history includes the categories of bulk goods that the reusable packaging has previously shipped; If the category of at least one previously shipped bulk cargo in the usage history conflicts with the category of the current bulk cargo, then the usage history is determined to contain a record that conflicts with the category of the current bulk cargo.

3. The method for safety supervision of reusable packaging of bulk goods as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The first piece of information is the user category of the current bulk cargo; The usage history includes the user categories of bulk goods that the reusable packaging has previously shipped; If the user category of at least one previously shipped bulk cargo in the usage history conflicts with the user category of the current bulk cargo, then it is determined that the usage history contains a record that conflicts with the category of the current bulk cargo.

4. The method for safety supervision of reusable packaging of bulk goods as described in claim 3, characterized in that, The user category includes one or any combination of the following: The categories of producers of the bulk cargo, consignors of the bulk cargo, consignees of the bulk cargo, and carriers of the bulk cargo.

5. The method for safety supervision of reusable packaging of bulk goods as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The bulk cargo is one of the following: bulk liquid, bulk paste, solid particulate matter, solid powder, or fibrous material.

6. The method for safety supervision of reusable packaging of bulk goods as described in claim 5, characterized in that, The reusable packaging includes an inner bag for accommodating bulk goods, and the method further includes: Obtain the inner bag identifier of the inner bag; The inner bag type is obtained based on the inner bag identifier; Determine whether the type of inner bag matches the type of the current bulk cargo; In response to the inner bag type not matching the current bulk cargo type, an authentication failure message is output.

7. A method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods, characterized in that, The current bulk cargo is bulk cargo to be loaded into the reusable packaging; the reusable packaging is empty; Before loading the current bulk cargo into the recycle packaging, perform the method as described in any one of claims 1-6.

8. A method for safety supervision of reusable packaging for bulk goods, characterized in that, The current bulk cargo refers to the bulk cargo that is currently contained in the reusable packaging; Before accepting the cyclic packaging, perform the method as described in any one of claims 1-6.

9. A safety monitoring system for reusable packaging of bulk goods, characterized in that, include: A label reading device for acquiring packaging labels of reusable packaging; A data query device is used to obtain the packaging category and usage history of the reusable packaging based on the packaging identifier; The verification device is used to determine whether the first information corresponding to the current bulk cargo category matches the packaging category, and / or whether there is a record in the usage history that conflicts with the first information; and, in response to the first information not matching the packaging category or the existence of a record in the usage history that conflicts with the first information, outputs information indicating authentication failure.

10. A computer program product comprising computer-executable instructions, characterized in that, When executed by a processor, the computer-executable instructions implement the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 8.