Closed-loop verification fire control system

Abstract

The invention discloses a closed-loop verification fire-fighting control system, and the system comprises a simulation unit which is used for generating simulation monitoring data of a specific fire scene and transmitting the simulation monitoring data to a control panel; the control panel is used for receiving the simulation monitoring data and generating a first type of fire-fighting instruction after matching the simulation monitoring data with a preset fire-fighting strategy; the execution unit is used for receiving the first type of fire-fighting instruction, executing the first type of fire-fighting instruction, generating operation data for executing the first type of fire-fighting instruction and transmitting the operation data to the control panel; and after the operation data of the first type of fire-fighting instruction is received, the control panel is also used for evaluating the execution validity of the first type of fire-fighting instruction based on the first type of fire-fighting instruction and the operation data. Through a dual-mode architecture in which simulation closed-loop verification and real protection are parallel, the limitation that a traditional fire extinguishing system needs to be shut down for testing is broken through, strategy continuous optimization and protection uninterrupted execution are achieved, and the reliability and response precision of the system are remarkably improved.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of energy storage fire fighting, and in particular to a closed-loop verification fire fighting control system. BACKGROUND

[0002] Traditional fire fighting system testing relies on real fire simulation or manual triggering of sensors, which has the problems of high cost, strong destructiveness and limited coverage scenarios. The existing technology has problems such as unstable data transmission, limited number of monitoring modules, and inflexible control, making it difficult to verify the full-link decision logic of the control board in a non-stop state, especially the reliability of multi-level early warning strategy and execution unit linkage. Hidden dangers such as communication interruption of relay modules or deviation of strategy execution cannot be actively exposed, which may lead to misjudgment or response delay in actual fire. In the face of the testing needs of large-scale energy storage fire fighting systems, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of the fire fighting performance of energy storage systems, which may lead to unrecognized risks and even fire safety accidents. In addition, the testing process cannot accurately reproduce complex parameter combinations such as temperature and CO concentration gradient, and the system's closed-loop verification capability is weak, limiting the safety and efficiency of operation and maintenance. The present application forms a closed-loop verification chain of instruction execution-data feedback-strategy optimization by accurately responding to the first type of fire fighting instruction and the second type of fire fighting instruction and generating high-fidelity operation data in real time and feeding back to the control board, thereby ensuring the reliability, testability and self-optimization capability of fire fighting actions at the hardware level, and providing the core basis for execution timeliness verification and fault tolerance iteration of the system. SUMMARY

[0003] To solve the technical problems in the background art, the present application proposes a closed-loop verification fire fighting control system.

[0004] The closed-loop verification fire fighting control system proposed by the present application comprises: a simulation unit for generating simulated monitoring data of a specific fire scene and transmitting the simulated monitoring data to a control board; the control board for receiving the simulated monitoring data and generating a first type of fire fighting instruction by matching the simulated monitoring data with a preset fire fighting strategy; an execution unit for executing the first type of fire fighting instruction after receiving the first type of fire fighting instruction, generating operation data of the first type of fire fighting instruction and transmitting the operation data to the control board; after receiving the operation data of the first type of fire fighting instruction, the control board is further configured to evaluate the effectiveness of the execution of the first type of fire fighting instruction based on the first type of fire fighting instruction and the operation data.

[0005] Further, the fire-fighting sub-module and the control module, the fire-fighting sub-module at least comprises an execution unit and a monitoring unit, the monitoring unit in the same fire-fighting sub-module is used to transmit the real-time monitoring data to the control board after obtaining the real-time monitoring data, and the execution unit is used to execute the second type of fire-fighting instruction generated by the control board after matching the real-time monitoring data with the preset fire-fighting strategy.

[0006] Further, the control module is integrated with a simulation unit, and the control module is also used to disconnect the communication between the control board and the monitoring unit when transmitting the simulation monitoring data to the control board.

[0007] Further, the relay module, the data transmission between the control board and the fire-fighting sub-module is carried out through the relay module; the data transmission between the control board and the control module is carried out through the relay module; and the disconnection of the communication between the control board and the monitoring unit is specifically the disconnection of the communication between the relay module and the monitoring unit.

[0008] Further, the control board is further connected with a plurality of fire-fighting sub-modules through the relay module.

[0009] Further, a plurality of relay modules are connected with the control board in communication, a plurality of control modules are connected with the plurality of relay modules in one-to-one correspondence, and a plurality of fire-fighting sub-modules are provided, and one group of fire-fighting sub-modules is connected to the control board through one of the plurality of relay modules.

[0010] Further, all the control modules can synchronously simulate a plurality of groups of simulation monitoring data and upload the simulation monitoring data to the control board, the control board can generate a plurality of first type of fire-fighting instructions in correspondence, and transmit the first type of fire-fighting instructions to all the execution units for execution through the relay module in one-to-one correspondence, and the control board is also used to evaluate the generation adaptability of the first type of fire-fighting instructions according to the plurality of first type of fire-fighting instructions and the plurality of simulation monitoring data corresponding to the first type of fire-fighting instructions.

[0011] Further, the control board is also used to evaluate the execution effectiveness and execution timeliness of the first type of fire-fighting instructions according to the plurality of first type of fire-fighting instructions and the plurality of operation data corresponding to the first type of fire-fighting instructions after receiving the plurality of operation data.

[0012] Further, the plurality of fire-fighting sub-modules are configured as independent processes running in parallel, wherein: The monitoring unit of the first group of fire-fighting sub-modules obtains real-time monitoring data of a fire scene in real time, and transmits the real-time monitoring data to the control board; the control board generates a second type of fire-fighting instruction based on the matching result of the real-time monitoring data and the preset fire-fighting strategy, and drives the corresponding execution unit to execute the second type of fire-fighting instruction operation; The monitoring unit of the second group of fire-fighting sub-modules is synchronously injected with simulated monitoring data generated by the simulation unit, the control board generates a first type of fire-fighting instruction based on the simulated monitoring data, and drives the corresponding execution unit to execute the first type of fire-fighting instruction operation; The real-time monitoring data transmission process of the first group of fire-fighting sub-modules is isolated from the simulated monitoring data transmission process of the second group of fire-fighting sub-modules through the independent communication channel of the relay module, and the data processing, instruction generation and execution unit response links in the control board do not interfere with each other.

[0013] In the present application, the proposed closed-loop verification fire-fighting control system triggers through simulated data instead of real fire, realizes non-destructive full-automatic testing, and significantly reduces operation and maintenance cost and risk. The control module dynamically generates multi-level threshold combination data such as temperature change and smoke concentration, and comprehensively verifies the control board strategy matching degree and the execution unit action accuracy. Independent link design supports parallel testing of multiple fire-fighting modules, improving efficiency. In the present application, the system actively regulates and controls most or even all control modules to perform simulation testing, and many or even all relay modules synchronously and simultaneously receive simulated data generated by the corresponding control modules, perform extreme situation limit transmission, and test and record hidden channel blockage, data packet loss and other link abnormal problems in all links. At the same time, a lot of instructions are sent in parallel to test whether different fire-fighting strategies produce competition and mutual exclusion when sharing hardware resources, so as to expose logical contradictions and coordination defects in the strategy library in real time, improve the overall reliability of the system, and ensure zero failure response when actually executing fire-fighting linkage. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0014] Fig. 1 A structure diagram of a closed-loop verification fire-fighting control system proposed in the present application; Fig. 2 A system architecture diagram of an embodiment of a closed-loop verification fire-fighting control system proposed in the present application; Fig. 3 An embodiment diagram of monitoring data threshold of a closed-loop verification fire-fighting control system proposed in the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0015] REFERENCE Figs. 1-3 The closed-loop verification fire-fighting control system proposed in the present application comprises: The simulation unit 3 is used to generate simulated monitoring data of a specific fire scene and transmit the simulated monitoring data to the control board 1.

[0016] The simulation unit 3 can simulate simulation monitoring data of a specific fire scene according to different fire scene conditions, including temperature, temperature difference, CO rising gradient, CO concentration, volatile organic compounds, smoke concentration and the like.

[0017] The control board 1 is used for receiving the simulation monitoring data and generating a first type of fire fighting instruction by matching the simulation monitoring data with a preset fire fighting strategy.

[0018] The control board 1 receives the simulation monitoring data uploaded by the simulation unit 3, including temperature, smoke concentration and the like, calls the preset strategy data in the built-in fire fighting strategy database to compare the simulation monitoring data, and marks a low value warning state when the simulation monitoring data reaches a preset first level threshold value, marks a high value warning state when the simulation monitoring data reaches a second level threshold value, and marks a fire alarm state when the simulation monitoring data reaches a third level threshold value. According to the marking state, a corresponding first type of fire fighting instruction text such as a warning instruction and a fire extinguishing instruction is generated, and the instruction text is bound to the address code of the execution unit 7. The address code is uniquely associated with the physical position of a specific fire extinguishing device. The relay module 2 identifies the address code in the data packet and sends it to the execution unit 7 through a special channel.

[0019] The execution unit 7 is used for generating operation data of the first type of fire fighting instruction after receiving and executing the first type of fire fighting instruction and transmitting the operation data to the control board 1.

[0020] The execution unit 7 includes a piercing valve and a liquid outlet valve. In actual work, the execution unit 7 verifies the validity of the instruction, drives the piercing valve to pierce the sealing film of the fire extinguishing agent storage tank, and then drives the liquid outlet valve to release the agent. The action sensor in the execution unit 7 records the piercing valve stroke distance and the liquid outlet valve opening angle in real time, and generates operation data of the fire fighting instruction in combination with the microprocessor, and encapsulates the operation data as a feedback data packet.

[0021] Specifically, the first type of fire fighting instruction and the corresponding fire fighting action can be divided into the following three levels: When the temperature and the temperature difference respectively reach a preset first level temperature threshold value, or the CO rising gradient, the CO concentration and the volatile organic compounds respectively reach a preset first level threshold value, the control board 1 generates a warning reminder instruction and stores a warning record.

[0022] Specifically, the first-level warning is a low-value warning, and there are two triggering conditions: the CO rising gradient reaches 30 ppm / 10 s, the CO concentration reaches 190 ppm, and the VOC reaches 4.0 V, or the temperature reaches 70°C and the temperature difference is <= 30; when any of the triggering conditions is met, a first-level warning signal is triggered, and the control board 1 generates a warning reminder instruction, which is sent to the relay module 2 in real time through the CAN communication interface to trigger the alarm device; at the same time, the control board 1 automatically stores the warning record including the alarm level, time stamp, module ID, and parameter details in the built-in flash memory or connected data storage device, realizing risk tracing and test history archival management.

[0023] When the temperature and temperature difference respectively reach the preset second-level temperature threshold, or the CO rising gradient, CO concentration, and smoke concentration respectively reach their preset second-level thresholds, the control board 1 generates a linkage inspection instruction to activate the adjacent monitoring unit 6 in high-frequency acquisition mode.

[0024] Specifically, the second-level warning is a high-value warning, and there are two triggering conditions: the CO rising gradient reaches 30 ppm / 10 s, the CO concentration reaches 300 ppm, and the smoke concentration B+R reaches 10+5, or the temperature reaches 75°C and the temperature difference is <= 30; when any of the triggering conditions is met, a second-level warning signal is triggered, and the control board 1 generates a linkage inspection instruction, which is sent to the specified relay module 2 through the CAN communication interface, triggering the monitoring unit 6 to increase the acquisition frequency of monitoring data such as temperature, CO concentration, and smoke concentration from the regular 1 Hz to 5 Hz, realizing real-time intensive monitoring, and forwarding the data to the control board 1 through the relay module 2 to identify potential thermal runaway risks in advance, enhancing the system warning accuracy and response efficiency.

[0025] When the temperature and temperature difference respectively reach the preset third-level temperature threshold, or the CO rising gradient, CO concentration, and smoke concentration respectively reach their preset third-level thresholds, the control board 1 generates an instruction to start firefighting, and performs firefighting action.

[0026] Specifically, the third-level warning is a fire alarm, and there are two triggering conditions: the CO rising gradient reaches 30 ppm / 10 s, the CO concentration reaches 500 ppm, and the smoke concentration B+R reaches 10+5, or the temperature reaches 80°C and the temperature difference is <= 30; when any of the triggering conditions is met, a third-level warning signal is triggered, and the control board 1 generates an instruction to start firefighting, triggering the corresponding piercing valve of the monitoring unit 6 to open first, and the piercing valve releases firefighting liquid into the battery pack simulating thermal runaway through a wet contact point; then the liquid outlet valve is opened to continuously supply firefighting liquid to the position of the piercing valve through the pipeline. This double-valve linkage mechanism ensures accurate injection of firefighting liquid into the thermal runaway point: the piercing valve realizes targeted release, and the liquid outlet valve maintains system pressure and flow, thereby efficiently completing thermal runaway suppression and fire extinguishing.

[0027] After receiving the operation data of the first type of fire command, the control board 1 is also used to evaluate the effectiveness of the execution of the first type of fire command based on the first type of fire command and the operation data.

[0028] The operational data may include: an instruction reception status identifier, used to confirm whether the execution unit 7 has fully received the fire command.

[0029] Specifically, the instruction reception status identifier consists of binary status codes, 0 / 1, which directly reflects whether the fire instruction has been completely transmitted to the terminal circuit of the execution unit 7: if the status code "1" is returned, it confirms that the fire instruction has been received without loss; if it is "0", it triggers the control board 1 to automatically activate the backup communication channel to resend the fire instruction, and at the same time records the transmission abnormal event to ensure the reachability of the fire instruction.

[0030] The instruction action execution identifier is used to identify whether the execution unit 7 has completed the fire-fighting action required by the fire-fighting instruction.

[0031] Specifically, the instruction action execution identifier generates an action verification signal through the built-in sensor of the execution unit 7: for example, the puncture valve confirms the displacement of the puncture needle through the displacement sensor and detects the pressure drop in the pipeline through the pressure sensor, and the liquid outlet valve verifies the opening status through the flow meter and the valve position switch; if the standard is not met, a preset fault code is returned, such as E01 indicating mechanical jamming, and the drive control board 1 starts the redundant fire extinguishing unit and marks the equipment fault log.

[0032] The instruction response timestamp is used to record the precise time when the execution unit 7 completes the fire-fighting action.

[0033] Specifically, the command response timestamp uses a millisecond-level time stamp generated by a synchronous clock to accurately record the absolute time point from the issuance of the fire command to the completion of the action. This data is used to quantify the system's end-to-end response delay, construct a multi-link fire extinguishing timing logic model, and generate a time-stamped operation sequence chain in the memory of control board 1 to support fire extinguishing performance auditing and accident process backtracking.

[0034] In this embodiment, the control board 1 verifies whether the fire command has been successfully delivered to the execution unit 7 by parsing the instruction reception status identifier (0 / 1 status code) fed back by the execution unit 7. If the identifier is "1", it confirms that the instruction has been completely transmitted through the communication link of the relay module 2; if it is "0", it automatically triggers the backup communication channel to retransmit the fire command, and records the ID and time information of the faulty relay module 2. This process can locate communication interruption nodes in real time, such as poor CAN bus contact or module failure, ensuring successful transmission of the fire command and effectively reducing the risk of fire extinguishing failure. At the same time, it generates a link quality report to assist maintenance personnel in quickly repairing problematic lines.

[0035] First, the validity of all selected communication links is checked, i.e., whether the command reception status identifier is "1". Second, the matching of action logic is verified, i.e., whether the execution identifier meets the preset standards such as puncture valve displacement ≥8mm, pressure drop ≥0.5MPa, and discharge valve flow rate ≥10L / min. Finally, the timing compliance is checked, i.e., whether the response timestamp meets the requirement of ≤300ms for puncture valve and ≤500ms for the entire link ≤800ms. When all three conditions are met simultaneously, control board 1 is deemed to be operating normally and the fire command is valid. If any link fails to meet the standard, such as communication interruption, valve not opening, or response timeout, the system immediately triggers the alarm log and accurately locates the faulty link, such as "relay module 03 - discharge valve E03 fault" or "zone 2 - CAN bus delay >200ms". This mechanism effectively improves the fault location speed, greatly reduces the false operation rate, and generates a maintenance order with fault codes to guide the repair.

[0036] In this embodiment, it also includes: a fire protection submodule 5 and a control module 4. The fire protection submodule 5 includes at least one execution unit 7 and one monitoring unit 6. The monitoring unit 6 in the same fire protection submodule 5 is used to transmit real-time monitoring data to the control board 1 after acquiring it. The execution unit 7 is used to execute the second type of fire protection command generated by the control board 1 after matching the real-time monitoring data with the preset fire protection strategy.

[0037] The monitoring unit 6 is used to collect real-time monitoring data and has a built-in data buffer to receive and store simulated monitoring data sent by the control module 4. In actual operation, the monitoring unit 6 monitors data in real time through sensors, such as temperature and smoke concentration, and temporarily stores the monitoring data in the built-in parameter buffer. When the control module 4 starts the simulation test, the simulation unit 3 injects simulated monitoring data into the buffer, such as a sudden temperature rise or excessive CO concentration. The injection instantly overwrites the real-time monitoring data. Then, the monitoring unit 6 packages the buffer data into encrypted data frames and forwards them to the control board 1 via the corresponding relay module 2.

[0038] The multiple fire protection submodules 5 are configured as independent processes running in parallel, wherein: The monitoring unit 6 of the first fire protection submodule 5 acquires real-time monitoring data of the fire scene and transmits the real-time monitoring data to the control board 1. The control board 1 generates a second type of fire protection command based on the matching result of the real-time monitoring data and the preset fire protection strategy, and drives the corresponding execution unit 7 to execute the second type of fire protection command operation.

[0039] The monitoring unit 6 of the second fire protection submodule 5 is synchronously injected with simulated monitoring data generated by the simulation unit 3. The control board 1 generates a first type of fire protection command based on the simulated monitoring data and drives the corresponding execution unit 7 to execute the first type of fire protection command operation.

[0040] Specifically, when control board 1 generates a first-type fire command based on simulated monitoring data or a second-type fire command based on real-time monitoring data, both types of commands follow the same set of mapping rules from a pre-set fire strategy library, differing only in their data sources. By unifying the mapping rules for commands and actions, a completely equivalent hardware response chain is formed between simulated verification and real-world protection, effectively solving the evaluation distortion problem caused by differences in actions between test modes and actual combat modes in traditional systems.

[0041] The real-time monitoring data transmission process of the first group of fire protection submodule 5 and the analog monitoring data transmission process of the second group of fire protection submodule 5 are isolated through the independent communication channel of the relay module 2. The two do not interfere with each other in the data processing, instruction generation and execution unit 7 response links within the control board 1.

[0042] Specifically, through a dual isolation mechanism of physical partitioning and data channels, the concurrent operation of real fire alarm handling and simulated strategy verification is achieved, completely solving the major defect of traditional systems that require the suspension of actual protection before testing can be carried out.

[0043] In this embodiment, it also includes a control module 4 that integrates a simulation unit 3. The control module 4 is also used to simultaneously disconnect the communication between the control board 1 and the monitoring unit 6 when transmitting the simulation monitoring data to the control board 1.

[0044] The control module 4 can use two CAN communication channels and one RS485 channel. One CAN communication channel is connected to the relay module 2 CAN2, and the other CAN communication channel is connected to the relay module 2 CAN1, which is equivalent to connecting to the monitoring unit 6. The RS485 communication channel serves as a maintenance port and is connected to the maintenance tool of the control board 1. The maintenance tool of the control board 1 is deployed in the test computer and supports Win7 and above systems. It can configure different types of relay modules 2 access or CAN communication methods by controlling the power input method, so as to realize the re-numbering, access quantity, and simulated alarm control of different monitoring units 6 under different relay modules 2.

[0045] In this embodiment, it also includes: a relay module 2, through which data is transmitted between the control board 1 and the fire protection sub-module 5; through which data is transmitted between the control board 1 and the control module 4; disconnecting the communication between the control board 1 and the monitoring unit 6 specifically means disconnecting the communication between the relay module 2 and the monitoring unit 6.

[0046] In this process, control module 4 sends a power-off command via the RS485 interface of the maintenance tool on control board 1 and shuts down the power input port of relay module 2, causing relay module 2 and its subordinate monitoring unit 6 to stop collecting and reporting data. This avoids interference from real-time data on the test results and ensures a zero-interference test environment. Control module 4 writes simulated monitoring data to the data buffer of power-off monitoring unit 6 via the CAN communication network. After writing, it locks the data space in the buffer to prevent real-time data updates. After power is restored, monitoring unit 6 transmits the simulated monitoring data to control board 1 via relay module 2.

[0047] In this embodiment, the control board 1 is also connected to multiple fire protection sub-modules 5 via relay module 2.

[0048] In this embodiment, it also includes: multiple relay modules 2 that are communicatively connected to the control board 1, multiple control modules 4 that are connected one-to-one with the multiple relay modules 2, and multiple sets of fire protection sub-modules 5, wherein each set of fire protection sub-modules 5 is connected to the control board 1 through one of the multiple relay modules 2.

[0049] Specifically, a control board 1 can connect to 35 relay modules 2, each relay module 2 connected to the control board 1 via CAN communication; each relay module 2 connects to 35 fire protection sub-modules 5, that is, 35 monitoring units 6, which are then connected one-to-one with 35 execution units 7. This large-scale modular architecture, which constructs a tree topology through relay modules 2, allows a single control board 1 to manage 1225 terminal nodes, avoiding the limitations of traditional testing systems that only perform single tests and cannot reach the actual field conditions.

[0050] In this embodiment, all control modules 4 can synchronously simulate multiple sets of simulated monitoring data and upload them to the control board 1. After generating multiple first-type fire-fighting instructions, the control board 1 can transmit them one-to-one to all execution units through the relay module 2. The control board 1 is also used to evaluate the adaptability of the generation of the first-type fire-fighting instructions based on the multiple first-type fire-fighting instructions and the multiple simulated monitoring data that correspond to them.

[0051] In the full-load verification process of the large-scale fire protection system, all control modules 4 establish data connections with the control board 1 through relay module 2 and simultaneously start the simulation unit 3. Each control module 4 generates simulated monitoring data for differentiated fire scenarios, and multiple sets of data are uploaded to the control board 1 in parallel via relay module 2. The control board 1 calls the distributed processing engine to independently match each set of simulated monitoring data with preset fire protection strategies, generating multiple first-type fire protection commands, which are then accurately distributed to each execution unit for execution via relay module 2. After the execution unit 7 completes its operation, it feeds back the actual response parameters, and the control board 1 starts the core process of the evaluation algorithm: performing mapping relationship analysis on each first-type fire protection command and the corresponding simulated monitoring data, and detecting the matching accuracy and coordination of strategy logic when multiple commands are executed concurrently. This scheme generates fire scenario data streams synchronously by all control modules 4 and drives the response of all execution units 7, constructing a dynamic verification environment that approximates real complex thermal runaway. This can eliminate the risk of strategy conflicts in advance, and improve the reliability of the fire protection system's multi-scenario coordinated response in real disasters to a new level.

[0052] In this embodiment, the control board 1 is also used to evaluate the effectiveness and timeliness of the execution of the first type of fire-fighting instructions based on the multiple first type of fire-fighting instructions and the multiple operation data after receiving multiple operation data corresponding to multiple first type of fire-fighting instructions.

[0053] The process by which control panel 1 verifies the validity of fire command execution by analyzing the command action execution identifier includes: the puncture valve displacement signal must meet the requirement that the actual extension displacement of the puncture needle is greater than or equal to a certain threshold, such as 8 mm, to confirm that the mechanical puncture action is in place; the puncture valve pressure signal must detect a pressure drop in the pressure relief pipeline greater than or equal to a certain threshold, such as 0.5 MPa, to verify that the battery pack sealing layer has been ruptured; the liquid outlet valve flow signal should reach the fire extinguishing liquid spray threshold greater than or equal to a certain threshold, such as 10 liters / minute, to ensure the extinguishing agent supply intensity; and the liquid outlet valve opening signal must conform to the fully open valve position to ensure that the fluid passage is unobstructed. If the above signals meet the criteria simultaneously, the identifier displays the "execution successful" code, indicating that the fire action meets the expectations and is valid; if an error code is returned, such as E01 mechanical fault, it indicates that any signal has not met the standard, and the backup fire extinguishing execution unit 7 is immediately activated and the location of the faulty equipment is marked. This verification mechanism significantly improves the accuracy of fire action execution, effectively avoids fire extinguishing delays caused by equipment failure, and generates an action verification report to assist in optimizing fire extinguishing strategies.

[0054] The process of evaluating the timeliness of fire command execution by parsing the command response timestamps on control board 1 includes: millisecond-level timestamps from the puncture valve and the discharge valve, such as 20240515-143025.358; calculating the total time from the command issued by control board 1 to the valve completing its action; if the puncture valve action is ≤300ms and the discharge valve opening is ≤500ms, totaling ≤800ms, then it is considered to meet the strategy; if the timeout occurs, an abnormal node is marked, such as "discharge valve response delay > 500ms", and a response delay analysis report is generated simultaneously. This process improves the overall timeliness pass rate of the system, exposes bottleneck problems such as mechanical jamming of the discharge valve and excessive CAN bus load, compresses the average response time after driver optimization, and significantly reduces the risk of thermal runaway propagation due to delayed fire extinguishing.

[0055] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of protection of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any equivalent substitutions or modifications made by those skilled in the art within the scope of the technology disclosed in the present invention, based on the technical solution and inventive concept of the present invention, should be covered within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A closed-loop verification fire control system, characterized in that, include: The simulation unit (3) is used to generate simulated monitoring data for specific fire scenarios and transmit it to the control board (1). The control board (1) is used to receive simulated monitoring data and generate a first type of fire command by matching the simulated monitoring data with the preset fire protection strategy; The execution unit (7) is used to generate operation data for executing the first type of fire command after receiving the first type of fire command and then transmit it to the control board (1). After receiving the operation data of the first type of fire command, the control board (1) is also used to evaluate the effectiveness of the execution of the first type of fire command based on the first type of fire command and the operation data.

2. The closed-loop verification fire control system according to claim 1, characterized in that, Also includes: The fire protection submodule (5) and the control module (4) are provided. The fire protection submodule (5) includes at least one execution unit (7) and one monitoring unit (6). The monitoring unit (6) in the same fire protection submodule (5) is used to transmit the real-time monitoring data to the control board (1) after acquiring the real-time monitoring data. The execution unit (7) is used to execute the second type of fire command generated by the control board (1) after matching the real-time monitoring data with the preset fire protection strategy.

3. The closed-loop verification fire control system according to claim 2, characterized in that, Also includes: A control module (4) integrating a simulation unit (3) is also used to synchronously disconnect the communication between the control board (1) and the monitoring unit (6) when transmitting the simulation monitoring data to the control board (1).

4. The closed-loop verification fire control system according to claim 3, characterized in that, Also includes: The relay module (2) transmits data between the control board (1) and the fire protection sub-module (5); the control board (1) transmits data between the control module (4) and the control module (4) through the relay module (2); the disconnection of the communication between the control board (1) and the monitoring unit (6) specifically means: disconnecting the communication between the relay module (2) and the monitoring unit (6).

5. The closed-loop verification fire control system according to claim 4, characterized in that, It also includes multiple fire protection sub-modules (5) connected to the control board (1) via a relay module (2).

6. The closed-loop verification fire control system according to claim 5, characterized in that, Also includes: Multiple relay modules (2) that are communicatively connected to the control board (1), multiple control modules (4) that are connected one-to-one with the multiple relay modules (2), and multiple fire protection sub-modules (5). Each fire protection sub-module (5) is connected to the control board (1) through one of the multiple relay modules (2).

7. The closed-loop verification fire control system according to claim 6, characterized in that, All control modules (4) can simultaneously simulate multiple sets of simulated monitoring data and upload them to the control board (1). After generating multiple first-type fire-fighting instructions, the control board (1) can transmit them one by one to all execution units (7) through the relay module (2) for execution. The control board (1) is also used to evaluate the generation adaptability of the first-type fire-fighting instructions based on the multiple first-type fire-fighting instructions and the multiple simulated monitoring data corresponding to them.

8. The closed-loop verification fire control system according to claim 7, characterized in that, The control board (1) is also used to evaluate the effectiveness and timeliness of the execution of the first type of fire-fighting command based on the first type of fire-fighting command and the multiple operation data after receiving multiple operation data corresponding to multiple first type of fire-fighting commands.

9. The closed-loop verification fire control system according to claim 2, characterized in that, The multiple fire protection submodules (5) are configured to run as independent processes in parallel, wherein: The monitoring unit (6) of the first fire protection submodule (5) acquires real-time monitoring data of the fire scene in real time and transmits the real-time monitoring data to the control board (1); the control board (1) generates a second type of fire protection command based on the matching result of the real-time monitoring data and the preset fire protection strategy, and drives the corresponding execution unit (7) to execute the second type of fire protection command operation; The monitoring unit (6) of the second fire protection submodule (5) is synchronously injected with simulated monitoring data generated by the simulation unit (3). The control board (1) generates a first type of fire protection command based on the simulated monitoring data and drives the corresponding execution unit (7) to execute the first type of fire protection command operation. The real-time monitoring data transmission process of the first group of fire protection submodules (5) and the analog monitoring data transmission process of the second group of fire protection submodules (5) are isolated through the independent communication channel of the relay module (2). The two do not interfere with each other in the data processing, instruction generation and execution unit (7) response links in the control board (1).

Images