Test method, device and system and storage medium
By acquiring parameters of the electric shaver's shaving components and the tested object, and combining them with a preset model to calculate the cutting pull index, the problem of lacking objective measurement in electric shaver evaluation is solved, achieving efficient shaver testing and design.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411179068.0
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-08-26
- Publication Date
- 2026-03-03
AI Technical Summary
The current evaluation of the beard-cutting ability of electric shavers lacks objective measurement, resulting in time-consuming and costly testing, which is not suitable for the product development stage.
A testing method is provided that by acquiring the parameters of the electric shaver's shaving components and the tested object, and combining them with a preset test model, the cutting pull index is calculated to quantify the shaving ability of the shaver.
This enables an objective evaluation of the shaving performance of electric shavers, improves testing efficiency, reduces testing costs, and assists in the design of more efficient shavers.
Smart Images
Figure CN121595174A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This disclosure relates to the field of testing technology, and in particular to a testing method, apparatus, system and storage medium. Background Technology
[0002] Electric shavers are an essential tool for daily grooming. The shaving components of an electric shaver include a foil and blades. When hair enters the foil, the blades cut it off, achieving a shave.
[0003] Current evaluation methods for the beard-cutting ability of electric shavers generally rely on subjective assessments and lack objective ones. This approach is time-consuming, costly, and unsuitable for the product development stage. Summary of the Invention
[0004] This disclosure provides a testing method, apparatus, system, and storage medium to address the shortcomings of related technologies.
[0005] According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, a testing method is provided, comprising:
[0006] Obtain the component parameters of the razor assembly inside the electric shaver; the component parameters are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the razor assembly on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver.
[0007] Obtain the object parameters of the object under test, which are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the object under test on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver;
[0008] The cutting pull index of the electric shaver is determined based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and the preset test model. The cutting pull index is used to characterize the ability of the electric shaver to generate pull on the test object when shaving the test object.
[0009] Optionally, obtain component parameters of the shaving assembly within the electric shaver, including:
[0010] The slot width of the inner foil of the razor assembly, the thickness of the inner foil, the width of the blades in the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly are obtained respectively.
[0011] The component parameters are determined based on at least one of the following: the width of the slot in the foil, the thickness of the foil, the width of the blades within the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly.
[0012] Optionally, the component parameters are determined based on at least one of the slot width of the foil, the thickness of the foil, the width of the blades within the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly, including:
[0013] Obtain the first product of the slot width, the blade width inside the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly;
[0014] The first quotient of the product of the thickness of the blade mesh and the first product is obtained as the component parameter.
[0015] Optionally, obtain the object parameters of the object under test, including:
[0016] The depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly are obtained respectively.
[0017] The object parameters are determined based on at least one of the following: the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly.
[0018] Optionally, the object parameters are determined based on at least one of the following: the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly, including:
[0019] Obtain the second product of the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, and the elastic modulus of the object under test;
[0020] The second quotient of the second product and the length of the measured object outside the razor assembly is obtained as the object parameter.
[0021] Optionally, the cutting pull index of the electric shaver is determined based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and the preset test model, including:
[0022] Obtain the first power weight index of the component parameter and the second power weight index of the object parameter, respectively;
[0023] Obtain the component parameters and the first power value of the first power weight index;
[0024] Obtain the object parameters and the second power value of the second power weight index;
[0025] The sum of the first power value and the second power value is obtained as the cutting pull index of the electric shaver. The larger the cutting pull index, the worse the performance of the shaving component.
[0026] According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, a testing apparatus is provided, comprising:
[0027] The component parameter acquisition module is used to acquire the component parameters of the razor assembly inside the electric shaver; the component parameters are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the razor assembly on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver.
[0028] The object parameter acquisition module is used to acquire the object parameters of the object under test, which are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the object under test on the cutting and pulling ability of the electric shaver.
[0029] The tensile force index determination module is used to determine the cutting tensile force index of the electric shaver based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and the preset test model. The cutting tensile force index is used to characterize the ability of the electric shaver to generate tensile force on the test object when shaving the test object.
[0030] Optionally, the component parameter acquisition module includes:
[0031] The first parameter acquisition submodule is used to acquire the slot width of the inner foil of the razor assembly, the thickness of the inner foil, the width of the blade in the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly, respectively.
[0032] The component parameter acquisition submodule is used to determine the component parameters based on at least one of the slot width of the blade mesh, the thickness of the blade mesh, the width of the blade inside the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly.
[0033] Optionally, the component parameter acquisition submodule includes:
[0034] The first product acquisition unit is used to acquire the first product of the slot width, the width of the blade inside the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly;
[0035] The component parameter acquisition unit is used to acquire the first quotient of the product of the thickness of the cutting mesh and the first product, as the component parameter.
[0036] Optionally, the object parameter acquisition module includes:
[0037] The second parameter acquisition submodule is used to acquire the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly, respectively.
[0038] The object parameter acquisition submodule is used to determine the object parameters based on at least one of the following: the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly.
[0039] Optionally, the object parameter acquisition submodule determines the object parameters, including:
[0040] The second product acquisition unit is used to acquire the second product of the depth of the tested object inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the tested object, and the elastic modulus of the tested object;
[0041] The object parameter acquisition unit is used to acquire a second quotient of the second product and the length of the measured object outside the razor assembly, as the object parameter.
[0042] Optionally, the tensile index determination module includes:
[0043] Obtain the first power weight index of the component parameter and the second power weight index of the object parameter, respectively;
[0044] Obtain the component parameters and the first power value of the first power weight index;
[0045] Obtain the object parameters and the second power value of the second power weight index;
[0046] The sum of the first power value and the second power value is obtained as the cutting pull index of the electric shaver. The larger the cutting pull index, the worse the performance of the shaving component.
[0047] According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, a testing system is provided, the testing system comprising: a memory and a processor;
[0048] The memory is used to store computer programs that can be executed by the processor;
[0049] The processor is configured to execute a computer program in the memory to implement the method as described in any of the first aspects.
[0050] According to a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium is provided, which, when an executable computer program in the storage medium is executed by a processor, enables the implementation of the method as described in any of the first aspects.
[0051] The technical solutions provided by the embodiments of this disclosure may include the following beneficial effects:
[0052] The testing method provided in this embodiment can obtain component parameters of the shaving assembly within an electric shaver. These component parameters characterize the influence of the shaving assembly's structure on the electric shaver's ability to generate cutting pull. Then, object parameters of the test object are obtained, characterizing the influence of the test object's structure on the electric shaver's ability to generate cutting pull. Subsequently, based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and a preset test model, a cutting pull index of the electric shaver is determined. This cutting pull index characterizes the ability of the electric shaver to generate pull on the test object when shaving it. Thus, this embodiment provides a cutting pull index to quantify the pull generated by the electric shaver on the test object, which helps verify the sharpness of the electric shaver's shaving assembly, improving testing efficiency and facilitating the design of electric shavers with higher shaving efficiency.
[0053] It should be understood that the above general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only, and are not intended to limit this disclosure. Attached Figure Description
[0054] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with this disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of this disclosure.
[0055] Figure 1 This is a block diagram illustrating a test system according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0056] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the slot width of a blade wire according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0057] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram illustrating a blade wire thickness according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0058] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram illustrating an object under test entering a blade mesh according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0059] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram illustrating a maximum shear angle and a minimum shear angle according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0060] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of a corner of a razor assembly according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0061] Figure 7 This is a flowchart illustrating a testing method according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0062] Figure 8 This is a flowchart illustrating an example of obtaining component parameters according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0063] Figure 9 This is a flowchart illustrating an example of obtaining object parameters according to an exemplary embodiment.
[0064] Figure 10 This is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary embodiment for obtaining the cutting tensile force index.
[0065] Figure 11 This is a block diagram illustrating a testing apparatus according to an exemplary embodiment. Detailed Implementation
[0066] Exemplary embodiments will now be described in detail, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. When the following description relates to the drawings, unless otherwise indicated, the same numerals in different drawings denote the same or similar elements. The embodiments described below by way of example do not represent all embodiments consistent with this disclosure. Rather, they are merely examples of apparatus consistent with some aspects of this disclosure as detailed in the appended claims.
[0067] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this disclosure provides a testing method, apparatus, system, and storage medium suitable for testing electric shavers. The electric shaver includes a shaving assembly comprising at least one shaving blade and a foil. When the shaving blade rotates, the hairs entering the foil are cut by the shaving blade, achieving a shave. In practical applications, considering the varying sharpness of shaving assemblies in different electric shavers, the shaving results also differ. Therefore, it is necessary to test the sharpness of the shaving assemblies of the aforementioned electric shavers. In subsequent embodiments, a cutting pull index is used to characterize the sharpness of the shaving assemblies of the aforementioned electric shavers; and, the smaller the cutting pull index, the sharper the shaving assembly of the electric shaver; conversely, the larger the cutting pull index, the less sharp the shaving assembly of the electric shaver.
[0068] The testing system provided in this embodiment can test the electric shaver described above, and is suitable for quantitative testing scenarios of shaving skin damage on the human cheek and neck.
[0069] The solutions of this disclosure are as follows: First, a testing system is provided to detect the component parameters of the shaving assembly of the electric shaver to be tested, and / or to detect the object parameters of the object under test; then, by combining the system with a preset testing model, the cutting pull index of the electric shaver can be determined, which can objectively test the electric shaver and simplify the testing process; Second, a testing method is provided to improve testing efficiency, which is beneficial for assisting in the design of electric shavers with higher shaving efficiency, and even for objectively evaluating the sharpness of different electric shaver shaving assemblies.
[0070] See Figure 1The aforementioned test system 10 includes: a processor 11, a memory 12, a distance measuring device 13, an elastic model measuring device 14, and an angle measuring device. The processor 11 is electrically connected to the memory 12, the distance measuring device 13, the elastic model measuring device 14, and the angle measuring device, respectively.
[0071] In one embodiment, see further. Figure 1 The memory 12 is used to store computer programs executable by the processor 11; the processor 11 is used to execute the computer programs in the memory 12 to implement a testing method as provided in the embodiments of this disclosure. The scheme of one testing method will be described in subsequent embodiments and will not be described here.
[0072] In one embodiment, see further. Figure 1 The distance measuring device 13 can be implemented using a high-precision laser device, calculating the distance between the emission point and the receiving point using the laser's round-trip time. Alternatively, the distance measuring device 13 can be implemented using a micrometer, and it also includes a screw rod for adjusting the micrometer, reading the counts on the main scale and fine-tuning scale of the micrometer, and finally obtaining the distance. It is understood that those skilled in the art can select a suitable distance measuring device 13 according to the specific scenario, and the corresponding solution falls within the protection scope of this disclosure when thickness, depth, or width can be detected.
[0073] In this embodiment, the distance measuring device 13 can measure at least one of the following: the width K of the slot in the inner foil of the electric shaver; the thickness H of the foil; the width W of the blade inside the shaver assembly; the depth S of the object being measured inside the shaver assembly; the diameter D of the object being measured; and the length L of the object being measured outside the shaver assembly. The distance measuring device 13 can then send these measured values to the processor 11. Those skilled in the art can adjust the measured values detected by the distance measuring device 13 according to specific scenarios, and the corresponding solutions fall within the protection scope of this disclosure.
[0074] See one example. Figure 2 The slot width K in the inner foil of an electric shaver refers to the width between two adjacent foil ribs 21. The wider the slot width K, the less easy it is for the shaver assembly to switch between test objects.
[0075] See one example. Figure 3 The thickness H of the shaving mesh refers to the thickness when viewed from the vertical direction of the beard entering the mesh from the outside towards the cross-section of the mesh's ribs 21. The thinner the mesh thickness H, the easier it is to shave the object being tested; the thicker the mesh thickness H, the more difficult it is to shave the object being tested.
[0076] In one example, see [link to example]. Figure 2The width W of the blade within the razor assembly refers to the length of the cutting edge on the blade used to cut the object being measured. It is understood that the blade 22 is set at a certain angle to the wire mesh 21 to facilitate capturing the object being measured.
[0077] See one example. Figure 4 The object under test 24 enters the interior of the razor foil through the holes in the foil, and at this point, the object under test is located at a depth S inside the razor assembly. Furthermore, the greater the depth S of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the less likely it is to be cut off.
[0078] In one example, see [link to example]. Figure 4 The object under test 24 enters the interior of the razor foil through the holes in the foil. At this time, the length L of the object under test outside the razor assembly is greater. Furthermore, the longer the length L of the object under test outside the razor assembly, the less likely it is to be cut off.
[0079] In one example, the elastic modulus measuring device 14 can measure the elastic modulus of the object being measured. Furthermore, the smaller the elastic modulus of the object being measured, the easier it is to cut it off.
[0080] In one example, angle measuring device 15 can measure the shear angle difference Delta A of the razor assembly. See also Figure 5 The processor can obtain the first shearing angle 51 between the razor 61 and the foil rib 21 in the razor assembly of the electric shaver. The first shearing angle 51 refers to the angle between the razor and the reinforcing rib when the first corner a of the razor intersects with the reinforcing rib of the foil rib 21.
[0081] See Figure 6 The razor 61 includes a blade 612 and a body 611. The intersection of the side containing the blade 612 and the side containing the body 611 (6111, 6112) is called an angle (a, b). The angle formed by the side of the body 611 closer to the center position O of the razor assembly and the blade 612 is the first angle a, and the angle formed by the side of the body 611 farther from the center position O and the blade 612 is the second angle b.
[0082] Similarly, the processor can obtain the second shearing angle 52 between the razor 61 and the foil rib 21 in the razor assembly of the electric shaver. The second shearing angle 52 refers to the angle between the razor and the reinforcing rib when the second corner b of the razor intersects with the reinforcing rib of the foil rib 21. Understandably, Figure 5 The first shear angle 51 is greater than the second shear angle 52. Then, the processor can obtain the shear angle difference ΔA (or Delta A) between the first shear angle 51 and the second shear angle 52. The larger the shear angle difference, the sharper the razor 61 is, and the easier it is to cut the object being measured.
[0083] The first shear angle 51 is the largest to facilitate capturing the beard hairs; the second shear angle 52 has the largest shearing force to facilitate cutting the beard hairs. The component parameters in this example include the shear angle difference, which takes into account both the shear angle and shearing force—two objective factors. This allows for consideration of the impact of these two factors on the sharpness of the razor component, improving testing and design efficiency.
[0084] In one example, the electric shaver can be fixed to a stationary device (such as a robotic arm), and the relative positional relationship between the electric shaver and the object being tested can be adjusted.
[0085] The evaluation system disclosed herein has a simple structure and low production cost. It largely replaces cumbersome subjective human testing, thereby improving testing efficiency, saving testing costs, expanding the scope of application, and enhancing the practical application value of the testing process.
[0086] exist Figure 1 In the case of the test system shown, this disclosure also provides a test method, see [link to relevant documentation]. Figure 7 This includes steps 71 to 73.
[0087] In step 71, the component parameters of the razor assembly inside the electric shaver are obtained; the component parameters are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the razor assembly on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver.
[0088] In this step, the processor can obtain the component parameters of the shaving assembly inside the electric shaver, see [link / reference]. Figure 8 The process includes steps 81 and 82. In step 81, the processor can obtain the slot width K of the foil within the razor assembly, the foil thickness H, the blade width W within the razor assembly, and the shear angle change Delta A of the razor assembly, respectively. In step 82, the processor can determine the component parameters based on at least one of the slot width K, foil thickness H, blade width W, and shear angle change Delta A of the razor assembly. For example, the processor can obtain a first product of the slot width K, blade width W, and shear angle change Delta A of the razor assembly; then, the processor can obtain the foil thickness H and a first quotient of the first product as the component parameter N.
[0089] In one example, the expression for the component parameter N is shown in equation (1).
[0090]
[0091] It should be noted that the above embodiments describe a scheme for determining component parameters using four parameters. In some possible examples, at least one of the following can be used to determine component parameters: the slot width K, the blade thickness H, the blade width W inside the razor assembly, and the shear angle change Delta A of the razor assembly. For example, the slot width K and the blade thickness H can determine component parameter N = H / K; similarly, the blade thickness H and the blade width W inside the razor assembly can determine component parameter N = H / W. The expression for component parameters can be set according to the specific scheme, and the corresponding scheme falls within the protection scope of this disclosure.
[0092] In step 72, the object parameters of the test object are obtained. The object parameters are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the test object on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver.
[0093] In this step, the processor can obtain the object parameters of the object being tested. See [link / reference]. Figure 9 The process includes steps 91 and 92. In step 91, the processor can obtain the depth S of the object being measured inside the razor assembly, the diameter D of the object being measured, the elastic modulus E of the object being measured, and the length L of the object being measured outside the razor assembly. In step 92, the processor can determine the object parameter based on at least one of the depth S of the object being measured inside the razor assembly, the diameter D of the object being measured, the elastic modulus E of the object being measured, and the length L of the object being measured outside the razor assembly. In one example, the processor can obtain a second product of the depth S of the object being measured inside the razor assembly, the diameter D of the object being measured, and the elastic modulus E of the object being measured. Then, the processor can obtain a second quotient of the second product and the length L of the object being measured outside the razor assembly as the object parameter M.
[0094] In one example, the expression for the object parameter M is shown in equation (2).
[0095]
[0096] It should be noted that the above embodiments describe a scheme for determining object parameters using four parameters. In some possible examples, at least one of the following can be used to determine object parameter M: the depth S inside the razor assembly, the diameter D of the object being measured, the elastic modulus E of the object being measured, and the length L of the object being measured outside the razor assembly. For example, the depth S inside the razor assembly and the length L of the object being measured outside the razor assembly can determine object parameter M = S / L; or, the diameter D of the object being measured and the length L of the object being measured outside the razor assembly can determine object parameter M = D / L. The expression for the object parameter can be set according to the specific scheme, and the corresponding scheme falls within the protection scope of this disclosure.
[0097] In step 73, the cutting pull index of the electric shaver is determined based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and the preset test model. The cutting pull index is used to characterize the ability of the electric shaver to generate pull on the test object when shaving the test object.
[0098] In this step, the processor can obtain at least one preset test model, such as a preset test model that only uses component parameters, a preset test model that only uses object parameters, or a preset test model that uses both component parameters and object parameters, which can be selected according to the specific scenario.
[0099] In one example, the processor can determine the cutting pull index of the electric shaver based on at least one of the component parameters, object parameters, and a preset test model. In this example, the expression for the cutting pull index Y is shown in equation (3).
[0100]
[0101] In another example, the processor can determine the cutting pull index of the electric shaver based on at least one of the component parameters, object parameters, and preset test models. In this example, the expression for the cutting pull index Y is shown in equation (4).
[0102]
[0103] In yet another example, the processor can determine the cutting pull index of an electric shaver based on at least one of component parameters, object parameters, and a preset test model, see [reference needed]. Figure 10 The process includes steps 101 to 104. In step 101, the processor can obtain the first power weight exponent α of the component parameter and the second power weight exponent β of the object parameter, respectively. In step 102, the processor can obtain the component parameter N and the first power value αN of the first power weight exponent α.
[0104] In step 103, the processor can obtain the second power value of the object parameter M and the second power weight exponent β.
[0105] In step 104, the processor can obtain the sum of the first and second power values as the cutting pull index of the electric shaver. The larger the cutting pull index, the worse the performance of the shaving components. In one example, the expression for the cutting pull index M is shown in equation (5).
[0106]
[0107] In one embodiment, given the component parameters and object parameters, the cutting pull force can be calculated according to equation (5) as the calculated value. Furthermore, the pull force exerted on the test object during shaving by the electric shaver can be detected using a force sensor or similar device, and this can be used as the measured value. Then, the calculated value and the measured value are compared to obtain the error value (a relative quantity without a positive or negative sign). When the error value is less than or equal to the error threshold (e.g., 1% to 10% of the calculated value), the test is passed; otherwise, it fails. Thus, this embodiment can assist in screening out good and bad electric shavers.
[0108] Thus, the testing method provided in this embodiment can obtain component parameters of the shaving assembly within an electric shaver. These component parameters characterize the influence of the shaving assembly's structure on the electric shaver's ability to generate cutting pull. Then, object parameters of the test object are obtained, characterizing the influence of the test object's structure on the electric shaver's ability to generate cutting pull. Subsequently, based on at least one of the component parameters, object parameters, and a preset test model, the cutting pull index of the electric shaver is determined. This cutting pull index characterizes the ability of the electric shaver to generate pull on the test object when shaving it. Therefore, this embodiment provides a cutting pull index to quantify the pull generated by the electric shaver on the test object, which helps verify the sharpness of the electric shaver's shaving assembly, improving testing efficiency and facilitating the design of electric shavers with higher shaving efficiency.
[0109] Based on the testing method provided in the embodiments of this disclosure, the embodiments of this disclosure also provide a testing apparatus, see [link to relevant documentation]. Figure 11 The device includes:
[0110] The component parameter acquisition module 111 is used to acquire the component parameters of the razor assembly inside the electric shaver; the component parameters are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the razor assembly on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver.
[0111] The object parameter acquisition module 112 is used to acquire the object parameters of the object under test, wherein the object parameters are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the object under test on the cutting and pulling ability of the electric shaver.
[0112] The tensile force index determination module 113 is used to determine the cutting tensile force index of the electric shaver based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and the preset test model. The cutting tensile force index is used to characterize the ability of the electric shaver to generate tensile force on the test object when shaving the test object.
[0113] In one embodiment, the component parameter acquisition module includes:
[0114] The first parameter acquisition submodule is used to acquire the slot width of the inner foil of the razor assembly, the thickness of the inner foil, the width of the blade in the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly, respectively.
[0115] The component parameter acquisition submodule is used to determine the component parameters based on at least one of the slot width of the blade mesh, the thickness of the blade mesh, the width of the blade inside the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly.
[0116] In one embodiment, the component parameter acquisition submodule includes:
[0117] The first product acquisition unit is used to acquire the first product of the slot width, the width of the blade inside the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly;
[0118] The component parameter acquisition unit is used to acquire the first quotient of the product of the thickness of the cutting mesh and the first product, as the component parameter.
[0119] In one embodiment, the object parameter acquisition module includes:
[0120] The second parameter acquisition submodule is used to acquire the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly, respectively.
[0121] The object parameter acquisition submodule is used to determine the object parameters based on at least one of the following: the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly.
[0122] In one embodiment, the object parameter acquisition submodule determines the object parameters, including:
[0123] The second product acquisition unit is used to acquire the second product of the depth of the tested object inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the tested object, and the elastic modulus of the tested object;
[0124] The object parameter acquisition unit is used to acquire a second quotient of the second product and the length of the measured object outside the razor assembly, as the object parameter.
[0125] In one embodiment, the tensile index determination module includes:
[0126] Obtain the first power weight index of the component parameter and the second power weight index of the object parameter, respectively;
[0127] Obtain the component parameters and the first power value of the first power weight index;
[0128] Obtain the object parameters and the second power value of the second power weight index;
[0129] The sum of the first power value and the second power value is obtained as the cutting pull index of the electric shaver. The larger the cutting pull index, the worse the performance of the shaving component.
[0130] It should be noted that the apparatus shown in this embodiment matches the content of the method embodiment, and the content of the above method embodiment can be referred to, which will not be repeated here.
[0131] According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, a testing system is provided, the testing system comprising: a memory and a processor;
[0132] The memory is used to store computer programs that can be executed by the processor;
[0133] The processor is used to execute the computer program in the memory to implement the method as described above.
[0134] In an exemplary embodiment, this disclosure also provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that, when an executable computer program in the storage medium is executed by a processor, enables the implementation of the method described above.
[0135] In an exemplary embodiment, a chip is also provided, the chip including a processor and an interface for reading a computer program through the interface to implement the method described above. The chip can be a conventional CPU (central processing unit) chip, GPU (graphics processing unit) chip, etc., or an acceleration chip specifically designed for artificial intelligence technology, such as an AI (Artificial Intelligence) accelerator.
[0136] In an exemplary embodiment, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium is also provided, which enables the testing method described above to be implemented when an executable computer program in the storage medium is executed by a processor.
[0137] Other embodiments of this disclosure will readily occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the specification and the practice of the disclosed solutions. This disclosure is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations that follow the general principles of this disclosure and include common knowledge or customary techniques in the art not disclosed herein. The specification and examples are to be considered exemplary only, and the true scope of this disclosure is indicated by the claims.
[0138] It should be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the precise structures described above and shown in the accompanying drawings, and various modifications and changes can be made without departing from its scope. The scope of this disclosure is limited only by the appended claims.
Claims
1. A testing method, characterized in that, include: Obtain the component parameters of the razor assembly inside the electric shaver; The component parameters are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the razor assembly on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver. Obtain the object parameters of the object under test, which are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the object under test on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver; The cutting pull index of the electric shaver is determined based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and the preset test model. The cutting pull index is used to characterize the ability of the electric shaver to generate pull on the test object when shaving the test object.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Obtain the component parameters of the razor assembly inside the electric shaver, including: The slot width of the inner foil of the razor assembly, the thickness of the inner foil, the width of the blades in the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly are obtained respectively. The component parameters are determined based on at least one of the following: the width of the slot in the foil, the thickness of the foil, the width of the blades within the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly.
3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The component parameters are determined based on at least one of the following: the slot width of the foil, the thickness of the foil, the width of the blades within the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly. These parameters include: Obtain the first product of the slot width, the blade width inside the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly; The first quotient of the product of the thickness of the blade mesh and the first product is obtained as the component parameter.
4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Obtain the object parameters of the object under test, including: The depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly are obtained respectively. The object parameters are determined based on at least one of the following: the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly.
5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that, The object parameters are determined based on at least one of the following: the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly. These parameters include: Obtain the second product of the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, and the elastic modulus of the object under test; The second quotient of the second product and the length of the measured object outside the razor assembly is obtained as the object parameter.
6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The cutting pull index of the electric shaver is determined based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and the preset test model, including: Obtain the first power weight index of the component parameter and the second power weight index of the object parameter, respectively; Obtain the component parameters and the first power value of the first power weight index; Obtain the object parameters and the second power value of the second power weight index; The sum of the first power value and the second power value is obtained as the cutting pull index of the electric shaver.
7. A testing apparatus, characterized in that, include: The component parameter acquisition module is used to acquire the component parameters of the razor assembly inside the electric shaver. The component parameters are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the razor assembly on the cutting pull capability of the electric shaver. The object parameter acquisition module is used to acquire the object parameters of the object under test, which are used to characterize the influence of the structure of the object under test on the cutting and pulling ability of the electric shaver. The tensile force index determination module is used to determine the cutting tensile force index of the electric shaver based on at least one of the component parameters, the object parameters, and the preset test model. The cutting tensile force index is used to characterize the ability of the electric shaver to generate tensile force on the test object when shaving the test object.
8. The apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that, The component parameter acquisition module includes: The first parameter acquisition submodule is used to acquire the slot width of the inner foil of the razor assembly, the thickness of the inner foil, the width of the blade in the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly, respectively. The component parameter acquisition submodule is used to determine the component parameters based on at least one of the slot width of the blade mesh, the thickness of the blade mesh, the width of the blade inside the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly.
9. The apparatus according to claim 8, characterized in that, The component parameter acquisition submodule includes: The first product acquisition unit is used to acquire the first product of the slot width, the width of the blade inside the razor assembly, and the change in the shearing angle of the razor assembly; The component parameter acquisition unit is used to acquire the first quotient of the product of the thickness of the cutting mesh and the first product, as the component parameter.
10. The apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that, The object parameter acquisition module includes: The second parameter acquisition submodule is used to acquire the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly, respectively. The object parameter acquisition submodule is used to determine the object parameters based on at least one of the following: the depth of the object under test inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the object under test, the elastic modulus of the object under test, and the length of the object under test outside the razor assembly.
11. The apparatus according to claim 10, characterized in that, The object parameter acquisition submodule determines the object parameters, including: The second product acquisition unit is used to acquire the second product of the depth of the tested object inside the razor assembly, the diameter of the tested object, and the elastic modulus of the tested object; The object parameter acquisition unit is used to acquire a second quotient of the second product and the length of the measured object outside the razor assembly, as the object parameter.
12. The apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that, The tensile index determination module includes: Obtain the first power weight index of the component parameter and the second power weight index of the object parameter, respectively; Obtain the component parameters and the first power value of the first power weight index; Obtain the object parameters and the second power value of the second power weight index; The sum of the first power value and the second power value is obtained as the cutting pull index of the electric shaver.
13. A testing system, characterized in that, The testing system includes: a memory and a processor; The memory is used to store computer programs that can be executed by the processor; The processor is configured to execute a computer program in the memory to implement the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.
14. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, When the executable computer program in the storage medium is executed by a processor, it can implement the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.