Closed-loop system for updating check file of multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage motor-pumped well court

Abstract

The invention discloses a closed-loop system for updating checking files of a multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well district, and relates to the technical field of computer software. The identification is used as a data association key to penetrate through all links of mobile checking, multi-level auditing, exception handling and file updating, a continuous and non-tampering work order life cycle data chain is constructed, and when a work order is circulated in a system, any operation for the work order can be operated in a tampering mode, so that the work order can be operated in a tampering mode. Comprising submission of field check data, passing / rejecting decisions of auditing personnel and disposal selection of exception handling personnel, all of which are bound with the unique identifier and recorded to an agricultural drainage district archive library in real time. Management personnel can inquire the real-time state of the work order, the operator of each link, the timestamp, the field picture, the auditing opinion and the data change history through the identifier, and the whole checking process becomes transparent through the mechanism.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of computer software, in particular to a multi-end cooperative farmland irrigation and drainage well station area verification archive updating closed-loop system. BACKGROUND

[0002] As a key power infrastructure for guaranteeing agricultural production, the accuracy of the archive information of the farmland irrigation and drainage well station area is directly related to the operation and maintenance efficiency of the equipment, the fault processing speed and the rational allocation of resources. The traditional farmland irrigation and drainage station area verification management relies on the mode of paper work order, manual field record and later manual input into the computer. This way is not only cumbersome, but also lags behind in information transmission, and is more likely to produce errors in the process of multiple handover input, forming an information island. With the development of mobile Internet technology, the problem of management closed loop and data traceability has not been fundamentally solved.

[0003] In the prior art, in the work order process management, the work order only circulates in the APP, and the PC management end cannot effectively intervene, forming a management fragmentation situation of mobile end operation and PC end blind area, resulting in invisible work order state, uncontrollable process, and untraceable history, and the real operation of the field personnel cannot be effectively supervised. Secondly, in terms of data quality and auditing mechanism, there is a lack of systematic and mandatory multi-level online auditing process, and the accuracy of the verification data highly depends on the subjective judgment of single personnel, and the error data is easy to directly enter the system, and there is a lack of effective identification and disposal mechanism for the difference between the verification data and the archive data, and the efficient operation such as batch dispatching cannot be realized, and the archive updating link is often omitted due to process disconnection.

[0004] Therefore, the prior art is difficult to meet the needs of fine and digital management of the farmland irrigation and drainage station area. It is urgent to develop a kind of work order full-process transparent management which can connect the PC end and the mobile end to solve the core pain points such as auditing deficiency and updating disconnection. SUMMARY

[0005] The purpose of this invention is to overcome the shortcomings of existing technologies and provide a closed-loop system for updating verification files in agricultural drainage well sites through multi-terminal collaboration. This system assigns a globally unique identifier to each verification work order upon dispatch, using this identifier as a data association key throughout all stages of mobile verification, multi-level review, anomaly handling, and file updates. This constructs a continuous and tamper-proof work order lifecycle data chain. When a work order circulates in the system, any operation on that work order, including the submission of on-site verification data, the approval / rejection decisions of reviewers, and the handling choices of anomaly handlers, is bound to this unique identifier and recorded in real time in the agricultural drainage well site archive. In the work order management module on the PC, managers can use this identifier to query the real-time status of the work order, the operators at each stage, timestamps, on-site photos, review opinions, and data change history. This mechanism makes the entire verification process transparent, allowing for rapid location and traceability of any delays, disputes, or errors, fundamentally solving the regulatory challenges caused by information asymmetry and ensuring the authenticity and accountability of verification actions.

[0006] To solve the above-mentioned technical problems, the present invention provides the following technical solution: a multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and file update closed-loop system, which includes a work dispatch management module, a mobile verification module, a multi-level review module, an anomaly handling module, and a file update module;

[0007] The dispatch management module is used to query the agricultural drainage area archive database on the PC based on preset filtering conditions, generate and dispatch a verification work order with a globally unique identifier to the mobile terminal of the designated verification personnel.

[0008] The mobile verification module is integrated into the application of the mobile terminal. It executes the routine verification process and receives and displays the verification work orders dispatched by the work order management module. It provides a structured interface to guide on-site verification personnel to enter and verify the actual information of the transformer area. The actual information of the transformer area includes basic information, well information, ownership and operation and maintenance information, charging information and on-site hidden danger information. It also uploads on-site environmental photos as verification evidence and submits the complete verification data package to the PC terminal.

[0009] The multi-level review module is used to receive and process the verification data packets submitted by the mobile review module on the PC. The data packets flow through two review units in sequence. Reviewers at each level make review conclusions by comparing the on-site data with the verification data packets. If any link in the review fails, the work order is returned to the mobile review module.

[0010] The exception handling module is used to handle data items that differ from the data in the verification data and the data in the agricultural and drainage area archive after all the multi-level review modules have passed the review, and provides two handling instructions: archive update and labeling error.

[0011] The archive update module is used to automatically synchronize the verification data marked as needing to be updated, changed, and noted to the agricultural and drainage area archive database according to the handling instructions of the anomaly handling module, thereby completing the optimization of the agricultural and drainage area archive database.

[0012] Furthermore, the work dispatch management module includes a work order generation unit and a status tracking unit;

[0013] The work order generation unit, in response to the user's batch selection operation on the agricultural drainage area archive, generates multiple verification work orders and assigns a globally unique identifier to each work order;

[0014] The status tracking unit is used to display the status of each work order in the current process in real time on the PC graphical interface based on the globally unique identifier.

[0015] The process status includes: pending assignment, pending verification, under first-level review, under second-level review, handling exceptions, and archived.

[0016] The status tracking unit provides management and reassignment functions for dispatched work orders, wherein:

[0017] The management function allows authorized users to terminate work orders that are pending verification or review. After termination, the work order status is reset to pending dispatch and can be reassigned.

[0018] The reassignment function is used to change the person responsible for a work order, and this operation does not change the globally unique ID of the work order.

[0019] Furthermore, the mobile verification module includes a data acquisition unit and a hazard work order triggering unit;

[0020] The data acquisition unit is configured to provide a structured form to collect basic information about the transformer area, well information, ownership and maintenance information, and charging information, and to upload supporting photos taken on-site.

[0021] The hazard work order triggering unit is configured to generate a rectification notification work order when the hazard level filled in by the inspector in the hazard information column before submitting the inspection data reaches the system's preset threshold condition. The rectification notification work order is associated with the current inspection work order by sharing the globally unique ID, forming a parent-child work order chain, thereby ensuring that the process from hazard discovery to rectification is traceable.

[0022] Furthermore, the multi-level review module includes a first-level review unit and a second-level review unit;

[0023] The first-level review unit is configured to: receive work orders submitted by the mobile verification module; reviewers review the entered on-site verification personnel and actual information of the transformer area; if the information is correct, the review is approved and the work order is transferred to the second-level review unit; otherwise, the review is not approved and the work order is returned to the mobile verification module for re-verification.

[0024] The second-level review unit is configured to: review work orders that have passed the review by the first-level review unit; if the review is successful, the work order is transferred to the exception handling module; if the review fails, it is returned to the mobile verification module.

[0025] Furthermore, the multi-level review module adopts a forced sequential flow logic;

[0026] The work order enters the to-do list of the first-level review unit. Once the reviewer in the first-level review unit completes the review and concludes that the work order is approved, the work order is allowed to be transferred to the to-do list of the second-level review unit.

[0027] After the reviewers in the second-level review unit complete the review and conclude that the review is passed, the work order is sent to the exception handling module.

[0028] If any review unit concludes that the review is unsuccessful, the system will immediately interrupt the process and return the work order to the original submitter's to-do list in the mobile verification module, requiring them to re-verify.

[0029] Furthermore, the exception handling module has a built-in work order constraint unit;

[0030] The closed-loop constraint unit is used to perform mandatory verification before the work order is submitted for archiving. The mandatory verification is used to scan the accuracy of all data in the current work order, list the data with differences as difference data items, and require the operator to make a clear handling instruction for each difference before the work order can be submitted.

[0031] Furthermore, the selected processing instructions include file update instructions and error annotation instructions, wherein:

[0032] The file update instruction is as follows: When the operator of the exception handling module confirms that the on-site verification data is true and accurate, and the difference from the original file is due to the file not being updated in time, the verification data that has been verified through multiple levels of review is temporarily stored in the cache area. The file update module calls the globally unique identifier, the data field to be updated and its new value parameter. After receiving the instruction, the file update module writes the temporary data field by field and according to the rules into the corresponding record in the agricultural drainage area archive.

[0033] The error annotation instruction for the general survey: When the operator of the anomaly handling module determines that there is an error in the on-site verification data and the difference from the agricultural drainage area archive is due to misjudgment or misrecording by the verification personnel, no write or modification operation will be performed on the central archive. Instead, a status identifier and remarks information will be added to the current work order.

[0034] Furthermore, the work dispatch management module also supports process management operations for dispatched work orders, including work order termination and work order re-dispatch.

[0035] The work order termination operation sets the status of an ongoing work order to terminated. The terminated work order can be reassigned and retains the original globally unique identifier.

[0036] The work order transfer operation changes the person responsible for executing the work order from the original verifier to a new verifier, but the globally unique identifier and existing process data of the work order remain unchanged.

[0037] Compared with existing technologies, this multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system has the following advantages:

[0038] This invention assigns a globally unique identifier to each verification work order upon dispatch, and uses this identifier as a data association key throughout all stages of mobile verification, multi-level review, anomaly handling, and even file updates. This constructs a continuous and tamper-proof work order lifecycle data chain. When a work order circulates in the system, any operation on that work order, including the submission of on-site verification data, the approval / rejection decisions of reviewers, and the handling choices of anomaly handlers, is bound to this unique identifier and recorded in real time in the agricultural and drainage area archive. In the work dispatch management module on the PC, managers can use this identifier to query the real-time status of the work order, the operators at each stage, timestamps, on-site photos, review opinions, and data change history. This mechanism makes the entire verification process transparent, and any delays, disputes, or errors at any node can be quickly located and traced, fundamentally solving the regulatory problems caused by information asymmetry and ensuring the authenticity and accountability of verification actions.

[0039] Other advantages, objectives and features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following examination or study, or may be learned from the practice of the invention. Attached Figure Description

[0040] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or the prior art, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are merely some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without any creative effort.

[0041] Figure 1 A flowchart of an operation process for a multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system;

[0042] Figure 2 A block diagram of a multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record updating closed-loop system;

[0043] Figure 3 This is a flowchart illustrating the workflow logic of a multi-level review module in a closed-loop system for updating records of agricultural drainage well sites in a multi-terminal collaborative manner. Detailed Implementation

[0044] To better understand the above technical solutions, a detailed description of the solutions will be provided below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. Obviously, the described embodiments are merely some, not all, of the embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the present invention without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0045] The terminology used in the embodiments of this invention is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to limit the invention. The singular forms “a multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system,” “the,” and “the” as used in the embodiments of this invention and the appended claims are also intended to include the plurality of forms, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise; “plural” generally includes at least two.

[0046] It should also be noted that the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that an article or device that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such an article or device. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the article or device that includes said element.

[0047] To address the shortcomings of existing technologies, this invention first describes the scenario of updating verification files for agricultural irrigation and drainage well areas. This invention is primarily applied to the digital management of agricultural irrigation and drainage well areas, involving on-site verification, data review, anomaly handling, and file updates for power infrastructure. In these scenarios, traditional methods rely on paper work orders and manual data entry, leading to delayed information transmission, high error rates, and disjointed processes, hindering closed-loop management and data traceability. This invention aims to achieve efficient, accurate, and traceable updates to agricultural irrigation and drainage well area verification files through multi-terminal collaboration, full lifecycle tracking of work orders, multi-level review, and anomaly handling mechanisms.

[0048] This invention provides a multi-terminal collaborative closed-loop system for updating verification records at agricultural drainage well sites. The system generates and assigns verification work orders with globally unique identifiers through a work dispatch management module. A mobile verification module guides on-site personnel to input structured data and upload evidence. A multi-level review module sequentially reviews data packets, an anomaly handling module processes discrepancies, and the record update module ultimately synchronizes the data to a central archive. The entire process, linked by globally unique identifiers, constructs a continuous, transparent, and tamper-proof work order lifecycle data chain, ensuring the authenticity and accountability of verification activities.

[0049] Specifically, such as Figure 2 As shown, a multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system achieves closed-loop management of the entire process from work order generation to record update through the collaborative work of various modules. The system includes: work dispatch management module, mobile verification module, multi-level review module, exception handling module, record update module, and work order management module.

[0050] The dispatch management module is used to query the agricultural drainage area archive database on the PC based on preset filtering conditions, generate and dispatch a verification work order with a globally unique identifier to the mobile terminal of the designated verification personnel.

[0051] The mobile verification module is integrated into the application of the mobile terminal. It executes the routine verification process and receives and displays the verification work orders dispatched by the work order management module. It provides a structured interface to guide on-site verification personnel to enter and verify the actual information of the transformer area. The actual information of the transformer area includes basic information, well information, ownership and operation and maintenance information, charging information and on-site hidden danger information. It also uploads on-site environmental photos as verification evidence and submits the complete verification data package to the PC terminal.

[0052] The multi-level review module is used to receive and process the verification data packets submitted by the mobile review module on the PC. The data packets flow through two review units in sequence. Reviewers at each level make review conclusions by comparing the on-site data with the verification data packets. If any link in the review fails, the work order is returned to the mobile review module.

[0053] The exception handling module is used to handle data items that differ from the data in the verification data and the data in the agricultural and drainage area archive after all the multi-level review modules have passed the review, and provides two handling instructions: archive update and labeling error.

[0054] The archive update module is used to automatically synchronize the verification data marked as needing to be updated, changed, and noted to the agricultural and drainage area archive database according to the handling instructions of the anomaly handling module, thereby completing the optimization of the agricultural and drainage area archive database.

[0055] In the specific implementation process, the dispatch management module runs on the PC and is responsible for querying the agricultural drainage area archive based on preset screening conditions to identify the areas to be verified, generating and dispatching verification work orders with globally unique identifiers to the mobile devices of designated verification personnel. This module includes a work order generation unit and a status tracking unit. The work order generation unit responds to the user's batch selection operation of the agricultural drainage area archive, generating multiple verification work orders and assigning a globally unique identifier to each work order to ensure the uniqueness and traceability of the work orders throughout the system. Based on the globally unique identifier, the status tracking unit displays the status of each work order in the current process in real time on the PC's graphical interface, including: pending dispatch, pending verification, under first-level review, under second-level review, exception handling, and archived. The status tracking unit also provides management and reassignment functions for dispatched work orders: the management function allows authorized users to terminate work orders that are pending verification and review. After termination, the status of the work order is reset to pending dispatch and can be reassigned; the reassignment function is used to change the person in charge of the work order, and this operation does not change the globally unique ID of the work order, ensuring the integrity of the historical data of the work order.

[0056] In practice, the dispatch management module provides a user interface via a PC-based web application or desktop application. After logging into the system, administrators set filtering criteria in the dispatch management interface. The system retrieves a list of eligible substations from the agricultural drainage substation archive. Users can select multiple substations in batches. The work order generation unit automatically generates an independent verification work order for each substation and assigns a globally unique identifier. After the work order is generated, the system distributes it to the designated verification personnel's mobile application via push notifications. The status tracking unit updates the work order status in real time through polling or event-driven mechanisms and displays it visually in a graphical interface, facilitating monitoring of work order progress by administrators. For example, when a work order is rolled back or reassigned, the status tracking unit immediately updates the status and records the operation log, ensuring full traceability.

[0057] The mobile verification module is integrated into the mobile terminal application. It executes the routine verification process and receives and displays verification work orders dispatched by the work order management module. This module provides a structured interface to guide on-site verification personnel to enter and verify actual information about the transformer substation, including basic information, well information, ownership and maintenance information, charging information, and on-site hazard information. It also requires the uploading of on-site environmental photos as verification evidence to ensure the authenticity and verifiability of the data. The mobile verification module includes a data acquisition unit and a hazard work order triggering unit. The data acquisition unit is configured to provide a structured form to collect various types of information about the transformer substation and requires the uploading of supporting photos taken on-site. The hazard work order triggering unit is configured to automatically generate a rectification notification work order when the hazard level entered by the verification personnel in the hazard information column before submitting verification data reaches a system-preset threshold. This rectification notification work order is associated with the current verification work order through a shared globally unique identifier, forming a parent-child work order chain, thereby ensuring the traceability of the hazard process from discovery to rectification.

[0058] In practice, on-site inspectors log in via a mobile app and receive inspection work orders in a to-do list. The data collection unit loads structured forms with dynamically configured fields based on the type of substation, reducing manual input errors. For example, when entering well information, the form provides standard options and supports QR code input. Inspectors must fill in the information item by item and take photos of the site using the app's built-in camera, which automatically adds watermarks. Before data submission, the system performs local verification to ensure data integrity. The hazard work order triggering unit monitors the hazard level field in real time. If the level reaches the threshold, a rectification notification work order creation interface automatically pops up, requiring the filling in of hazard details and rectification suggestions. The rectification notification work order inherits the globally unique identifier of the parent work order and generates a child work order ID, which is stored in the system. The mobile inspection module submits the complete inspection data package to the PC-based multi-level review module via an encrypted transmission protocol.

[0059] The multi-level review module runs on the PC, sequentially receiving and processing verification data packets submitted by the mobile verification module. These packets flow through two levels of review units: a first-level review unit and a second-level review unit. Reviewers at each level compare on-site data with the verification data packets to reach a review conclusion. If any stage of the review fails, the work order is returned to the mobile verification module. The multi-level review module employs a forced sequential flow logic, such as... Figure 3 As shown, the specific steps of the multi-level review module's workflow are as follows:

[0060] The work order enters the to-do list of the first-level review unit. Once the reviewer in the first-level review unit completes the review and concludes that the work order is approved, the work order is allowed to be transferred to the to-do list of the second-level review unit.

[0061] After the reviewers in the second-level review unit complete the review and conclude that the review is passed, the work order is sent to the exception handling module.

[0062] If any review unit concludes that the review is unsuccessful, the system will immediately interrupt the process and return the work order to the original submitter's to-do list in the mobile verification module, requiring them to re-verify.

[0063] In the implementation, the first-level review unit is configured to receive work orders submitted by the mobile verification module. Reviewers verify the identity of the on-site verification personnel and the actual information of the drainage area. The review interface displays the work order details and provides review operation buttons. Reviewers can compare the data with historical data in the agricultural drainage area archive. If everything is correct, they click "Approve," and the work order automatically proceeds to the second-level review unit; otherwise, they select "Disapprove" and fill in the reason for the rollback, returning the work order to the mobile verification module. The second-level review unit is configured to review work orders approved by the first-level review unit. Reviewers focus on verifying data logic and the level of potential risks. If the review is successful, the work order proceeds to the exception handling module; if the review fails, it is returned to the mobile verification module. During the review process, all operations are bound to a globally unique identifier for the work order and recorded in the audit log, achieving full transparency throughout the process.

[0064] The exception handling module runs on the PC and is used to handle data items that differ from the data in the agricultural drainage area archive after all multi-level review modules have approved the data. This module provides two handling instructions: archive update and error labeling. It also includes a built-in work order constraint unit for mandatory verification before work orders are submitted for archiving. The mandatory verification scans the accuracy of all data in the current work order and lists any discrepancies as discrepancy data items. Operators are required to make a clear handling instruction for each discrepancy before the work order can be submitted.

[0065] In practice, the exception handling module's interface displays discrepancy data items in a list format, with handling options next to each data item. Handling instructions include file update instructions and error annotation instructions: When operators confirm the accuracy of on-site verification data and that the difference from the original files stems from outdated files, selecting the file update instruction will temporarily store the verification data, which has undergone multi-level review and confirmation, in the cache. The system will then retrieve the data field carrying a globally unique identifier, the data to be updated, and its new value parameters, awaiting synchronization by the file update module. When operators determine that the on-site verification data contains errors and that the difference from the agricultural drainage area archive is due to misjudgment or mis-recording by the verification personnel, selecting the census error annotation instruction will prevent the system from performing any write or modification operations on the central archive. Instead, it will add a status identifier and remarks to the current work order, allowing the work order to be directly archived. Before submission, the work order constraint unit triggers a verification script to ensure that all discrepancies have been handled; otherwise, a warning message will pop up to prevent omissions.

[0066] The file update module runs on the PC and is used to automatically synchronize verification data marked as needing updates, changes, and comments to the agricultural drainage substation archive database based on the handling instructions from the exception handling module. This optimizes the agricultural drainage substation archive database. After receiving instructions from the exception handling module, this module retrieves temporary data from the cache and writes it to the corresponding records in the agricultural drainage substation archive database field by field according to rules. For example, for file update instructions, the module executes SQL update statements or calls API interfaces to modify the substation information in the archive database; for error marking instructions, the module only adds status and comments to the work order record without modifying the core files.

[0067] In its implementation, the file update module adopts a transaction processing mechanism to ensure the atomicity and consistency of data synchronization. When an update operation is performed, the system first backs up the original data, then writes the new data and records the change history. After synchronization is completed, the work order status is updated to archived and relevant personnel are notified through the message service.

[0068] Specifically, such as Figure 1 The flowchart shown illustrates a multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system, detailing the specific steps involved in cross-sectional flow monitoring and estimation within this system.

[0069] (1) PC-based work order dispatch

[0070] Login and Inquiry: Administrators log in to the system PC and enter the work dispatch management module.

[0071] Set filtering criteria: Filter the list of agricultural drainage substations to be checked based on the power supply unit, substation number, substation name, etc.

[0072] Select the station area: Select the station areas that need to be dispatched from the query results list, either individually or in batches.

[0073] Generate work order: The system automatically generates a verification work order with a globally unique identifier for each selected area.

[0074] Assign personnel: In the pop-up interface, select or search for specific on-site verification personnel and confirm the assignment.

[0075] Work order dispatch: When a work order is officially dispatched, the system will push the work order to the to-do list of the designated checker's mobile APP.

[0076] (2) On-site verification via mobile terminal

[0077] Receiving work orders: On-site inspectors log in to the APP on their mobile devices and receive dispatched work orders in the pending work orders or pending items.

[0078] View work order details: Click on the work order to view the basic information of the transformer area and the list of specific items that need to be checked.

[0079] On-site data collection: According to the work order instructions, verify and enter or modify the following items one by one: basic information of the transformer area, well information, transformer area ownership and operation and maintenance information, charging information, and on-site potential hazards.

[0080] Photo evidence collection: Take photos of key information points or potential hazard locations on-site as supporting evidence for verification.

[0081] Submit verification data: After all projects have been verified and confirmed to be correct, the system will package the data collected on site into a verification data package and submit it to the PC system. The work order will automatically flow to the next stage. If hazard information is filled in, the system will automatically trigger the generation of an associated rectification notification work order.

[0082] (3) First-level review

[0083] Work orders pending: Power supply station-level reviewers log in to the PC system and see the work orders that have been transferred in the list of pending work orders.

[0084] Data comparison and verification: The system interface will display the original archive data and the data submitted during on-site verification side by side for the auditors to compare.

[0085] Audit conclusion: The auditors make a judgment based on the comparison results:

[0086] Approved: If the verified data is confirmed to be accurate, the work order will be transferred to the second-level review unit for review.

[0087] Audit failed: If the audited data is found to be incorrect or questionable, the work order will be returned to the mobile audit module, requiring the original auditor to re-verify.

[0088] (4) Second-level review

[0089] Work order review: The second-level review unit reviewers log in to the PC to review the work orders that have been approved by the power supply station.

[0090] Secondary data comparison: The same comparison is made between the archived data and the verification data.

[0091] The review conclusion is as follows:

[0092] Review passed: If the review is passed but there are discrepancies in the content data, the work order will be transferred to the exception handling stage.

[0093] If the review fails: the work order will also be returned to the mobile app for re-review.

[0094] (5) Abnormal data processing

[0095] Receiving approved work orders: Anomaly handlers log into the system to view a list of work orders that have passed two levels of review but have data discrepancies.

[0096] Confirm discrepancies: The system will clearly list all data items that are inconsistent with the original file.

[0097] Choosing a handling method: The anomaly handling personnel will assess each discrepancy and select a handling method:

[0098] Update Files: If you confirm that the on-site verification data is up-to-date, select this option to instruct the system to overwrite the old files with the new data.

[0099] Mark survey errors: If the error is determined to be due to an on-site verification error, select this option. The system will record the reason for the error but will not update the file.

[0100] Forced verification submission: The system requires that all discrepancies be processed and selected before submission is allowed to ensure that nothing is missed.

[0101] (6) Archives are updated synchronously.

[0102] Command reception and execution: The file update module receives file update commands from the exception handling module.

[0103] Data writing: The module automatically calls the preset interface to write the accurate verification data marked as needing to be updated into the corresponding records in the central agricultural drainage area archive in batches and with precision.

[0104] Record update log: The system automatically records a detailed log of this file update, including work order ID, update time, operator, and changes.

[0105] (7) Work order archiving

[0106] Process completion: Once all abnormal data has been processed and the archives have been synchronized, the status of the verification work order changes to archived, and the entire verification and update process ends, forming a closed loop.

[0107] In summary, this invention, through the collaborative work of its various modules, constructs a complete closed-loop management system encompassing work order generation, on-site verification, multi-level review, anomaly handling, and record updates. The modules are tightly integrated, with clear data flow, collectively ensuring the accuracy, timeliness, and traceability of agricultural drainage area records. The system's multi-terminal collaborative design resolves the disconnect between PC and mobile terminals, the mandatory review and anomaly handling mechanisms improve data quality, and the globally unique identifier achieves full-process transparency, fundamentally solving the information silos and regulatory challenges inherent in traditional methods.

[0108] The above description is merely a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention in any way. Although the present invention has been disclosed above with reference to preferred embodiments, it is not intended to limit the present invention. Any person skilled in the art can make some modifications or alterations to the above-disclosed technical content to create equivalent embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. Any simple modifications, equivalent changes and alterations made to the above embodiments based on the technical essence of the present invention without departing from the scope of the present invention shall still fall within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A multi-terminal collaborative closed-loop system for verifying and updating records of agricultural drainage well sites, characterized in that, The system includes: a work dispatch management module, a mobile verification module, a multi-level approval module, an exception handling module, and a file update module; The dispatch management module is used to query the agricultural drainage area archive database on the PC based on preset filtering conditions, generate and dispatch a verification work order with a globally unique identifier to the mobile terminal of the designated verification personnel. The mobile verification module is integrated into the application of the mobile terminal. It executes the routine verification process and receives and displays the verification work orders dispatched by the work order management module. It provides a structured interface to guide on-site verification personnel to enter and verify the actual information of the transformer area. The actual information of the transformer area includes basic information, well information, ownership and operation and maintenance information, charging information and on-site hidden danger information. It also uploads on-site environmental photos as verification evidence and submits the complete verification data package to the PC terminal. The multi-level review module is used to receive and process the verification data packets submitted by the mobile review module on the PC. The data packets flow through two review units in sequence. Reviewers at each level make review conclusions by comparing the on-site data with the verification data packets. If any link in the review fails, the work order is returned to the mobile review module. The exception handling module is used to handle data items that differ from the data in the verification data and the data in the agricultural and drainage area archive after all the multi-level review modules have passed the review, and provides two handling instructions: archive update and labeling error. The archive update module is used to automatically synchronize the verification data marked as needing to be updated, changed, and noted to the agricultural and drainage area archive database according to the handling instructions of the anomaly handling module, thereby completing the optimization of the agricultural and drainage area archive database.

2. The multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The dispatch management module includes a work order generation unit and a status tracking unit; The work order generation unit, in response to the user's batch selection operation on the agricultural drainage area archive, generates multiple verification work orders and assigns a globally unique identifier to each work order; The status tracking unit is used to display the status of each work order in the current process in real time on the PC graphical interface based on the globally unique identifier. The process status includes: pending assignment, pending verification, under first-level review, under second-level review, handling exceptions, and archived. The status tracking unit provides management and reassignment functions for dispatched work orders, wherein: The management function allows authorized users to terminate work orders that are pending verification or review. After termination, the work order status is reset to pending dispatch and can be reassigned. The reassignment function is used to change the person responsible for a work order, and this operation does not change the globally unique ID of the work order.

3. The multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The mobile verification module includes a data acquisition unit and a hidden danger work order triggering unit; The data acquisition unit is configured to provide a structured form to collect basic information about the transformer area, well information, ownership and maintenance information, and charging information, and to upload supporting photos taken on-site. The hazard work order triggering unit is configured to generate a rectification notification work order when the hazard level filled in by the inspector in the hazard information column before submitting the inspection data reaches the system's preset threshold condition. The rectification notification work order is associated with the current inspection work order by sharing the globally unique ID, forming a parent-child work order chain.

4. The multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The multi-level review module includes a first-level review unit and a second-level review unit; The first-level review unit is configured to: receive work orders submitted by the mobile verification module; reviewers review the entered on-site verification personnel and actual information of the transformer area; if the information is correct, the review is approved and the work order is transferred to the second-level review unit; otherwise, the review is not approved and the work order is returned to the mobile verification module for re-verification. The second-level review unit is configured to: review work orders that have passed the review by the first-level review unit; if the review is successful, the work order is transferred to the exception handling module; if the review fails, it is returned to the mobile verification module.

5. The multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system according to claim 4, characterized in that, The multi-level review module adopts a forced sequential flow logic; The work order enters the to-do list of the first-level review unit. Once the reviewer in the first-level review unit completes the review and concludes that the work order is approved, the work order is allowed to be transferred to the to-do list of the second-level review unit. After the reviewers in the second-level review unit complete the review and conclude that the review is passed, the work order is sent to the exception handling module. If any review unit concludes that the review is unsuccessful, the system will immediately interrupt the process and return the work order to the original submitter's to-do list in the mobile verification module, requiring them to re-verify.

6. The multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The exception handling module has a built-in work order constraint unit. The closed-loop constraint unit is used to perform mandatory verification before the work order is submitted for archiving. The mandatory verification is used to scan the accuracy of all data in the current work order, list the data with differences as difference data items, and require the operator to make a clear handling instruction for each difference before the work order can be submitted.

7. A multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system according to claim 6, characterized in that, The disposal instruction selection includes file update instructions and error annotation instructions, wherein: The file update instruction is as follows: When the operator of the exception handling module confirms that the on-site verification data is true and accurate, and the difference from the original file is due to the file not being updated in time, the verification data that has been verified through multiple levels of review is temporarily stored in the cache area. The file update module calls the globally unique identifier, the data field to be updated and its new value parameter. After receiving the instruction, the file update module writes the temporary data field by field and according to the rules into the corresponding record in the agricultural drainage area archive. The error annotation instruction for the general survey: When the operator of the anomaly handling module determines that there is an error in the on-site verification data and the difference from the agricultural drainage area archive is due to misjudgment or misrecording by the verification personnel, no write or modification operation will be performed on the central archive. Instead, a status identifier and remarks information will be added to the current work order.

8. The multi-terminal collaborative agricultural drainage well site verification and record update closed-loop system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The work dispatch management module also supports process management operations for dispatched work orders, including work order termination and work order re-dispatch. The work order termination operation sets the status of an ongoing work order to terminated. The terminated work order can be reassigned and retains the original globally unique identifier. The work order transfer operation changes the person responsible for executing the work order from the original verifier to a new verifier, but the globally unique identifier and existing process data of the work order remain unchanged.

Images