Evaluation method for association of cigarette sensory quality and rolling and packing quality

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of cigarette sensory quality evaluation, and relates to a cigarette sensory quality and rolling and packaging quality correlation evaluation method which comprises the following steps: 1, establishing a cigarette rolling and packaging quality evaluation method; 2, establishing a batch management mechanism corresponding to a cigarette shred making batch, a wrapping batch, a cigarette finished product sampling batch, a quality detection batch and a sensory quality smoke panel test batch 5 based on the application of a box-type shred storage technology; 3, establishing a sensory quality and rolling quality correlation method for cigarette batches with abnormal sensory smoking evaluation; 4, establishing a developing method of the wrapping quality indexes influencing the sensory quality; according to the method, the technical problem of specific indexes of the sensory quality traceability roll is solved, and a powerful basis is provided for solving the problem of influencing the sensory quality.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] The present application belongs to the technical field of cigarette sensory quality evaluation, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating the correlation between cigarette sensory quality and cigarette making quality. BACKGROUND

[0002] Cigarette sensory quality is one of the most important quality characteristics of cigarettes. Cigarette sensory quality is objectively subject to fluctuations due to various factors. Some enterprises have small fluctuations, and have small market reactions. Some enterprises have large fluctuations, and have large market reactions, which may even cause fluctuations in market sales and affect the competitiveness of products. Each cigarette production enterprise strives to find the causes of product sensory quality and take preventive measures, but there is no systematic method for applying comprehensive quality evaluation data to correlate with sensory quality to find the source of fluctuations in cigarette making quality indicators.

[0003] However, in the cigarette production and cigarette making process, cigarette sensory quality evaluation is mainly based on national standards and enterprise experience to develop standards, and is controlled according to the standards. When the cigarette sensory quality fluctuates, there is a lack of systematic correlation and traceability method, a lack of data support, and it is impossible to find the real cause.

[0004] Therefore, there is a need for a cigarette sensory quality evaluation method that quantifies quality level and stability evaluation, has sensitivity and objectivity, and solves the above technical problems. SUMMARY

[0005] The present application provides the following technical solution: a method for evaluating the correlation between cigarette sensory quality and cigarette making quality, comprising the following steps: Step 1, establishing a cigarette making and packaging quality evaluation method; Step 2, based on the application of box-type cut tobacco storage technology, establishing a batch management mechanism corresponding to five batches of cigarette cut tobacco, cigarette making, cigarette product sampling, quality detection, and sensory quality evaluation; Step 3, establishing a method for correlating sensory quality and cigarette making quality for cigarette batches with abnormal sensory evaluation; Step 4, establishing a method for visualizing cigarette making quality indicators that affect sensory quality.

[0006] Preferably, the step 1 specifically comprises the following sub-steps: Step 1-1, for different specifications of cigarettes, establishing an evaluation element linear function relationship formula according to the distribution table of step 1-1:

[0007] Step 1-2, according to the distribution table of step 1-1, the evaluation element linear function relationship formula is constructed as: (1) wherein, Stability index of i element, Slope of i element, Intercept of i element, Detection value of i element.

[0008] Step 1-3, establish a comprehensive quality evaluation method of cigarette rolling, and the stability index calculation formula is: (2) Wherein, Weight of each element.

[0009] Step 1-4, evaluate data.

[0010] More preferably, in the step 1-1, the 11 comprehensive quality evaluation elements of cigarette rolling include: weight mark deviation, weight deviation, suction resistance mark deviation, suction resistance deviation, moisture content deviation, ventilation rate mark deviation, ventilation rate deviation, hardness mark deviation, hardness deviation, end filament amount, and end filament amount. The evaluation standard includes: 0 points, 60 points, 100 points. The weight includes: 12%, 8%, 6%, and the total weight of the 11 comprehensive quality evaluation elements of cigarette rolling is 100%.

[0011] Preferably, the step 3 specifically comprises the following sub-steps: Step 3-1, according to the influence on smoking experience and sensory quality, the index is divided into two categories: direct correlation and indirect correlation; step 3-2, find the influencing factors and order of the problem batch, all the sub-indexes lower than the total score of the cigarette rolling evaluation of the batch are listed, and the order is sorted from low to high; step 3-3, find the cigarette rolling quality index affecting sensory quality.

[0012] Preferably, in the step 4, the flow of the developing method is: Quality index affecting sensory→evaluation score→measured index→measured average value→standard value→difference value, finally, the index, degree and reason affecting sensory quality are shown.

[0013] The beneficial effects of the present application are: 1. The quality evaluation technology established by the present application includes 11 indexes, which solves the problem of quantitative quality level and stability evaluation, and adopts linear function score technology to ensure the sensitivity and objectivity of the evaluation results.

[0014] 2. The present application establishes a batch management mechanism corresponding to five batches of cigarette rolling, cigarette rolling, cigarette product sampling, quality detection and sensory quality evaluation, which provides convenience for tracing the quality of cigarette rolling, even the quality of cigarette rolling process.

[0015] 3. The present application establishes a method for correlating sensory quality and rolling quality of cigarette batches with sensory evaluation abnormalities, solving the problem of relying on experience and scattered and unsystematic data.

[0016] 4. The present application establishes a method for developing rolling quality indicators that affect sensory quality, solving the technical method of tracing the specific indicators of rolling quality for sensory quality, and providing a basis for solving the problem of affecting sensory quality. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0017] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the steps of the evaluation method for correlating sensory quality and rolling quality of cigarettes according to the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0018] The related technologies in the present application will be described clearly and completely in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, not all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative labor fall within the scope of the present application.

[0019] As shown in Figure 1 The evaluation method for correlating sensory quality and rolling quality of cigarettes according to the present embodiment includes the following steps: Step 1, establishing a scientific and reasonable evaluation method for rolling and packaging quality of cigarettes; 1-1, for different specifications of cigarettes, establishing 11 rolling comprehensive quality evaluation elements, evaluation standards, and weight distribution as shown in Table 1.

[0020]

[0021] ① The above 60-point node and 100-point node and the corresponding index value are linear functions, and the 0-point corresponding index value is the value calculated by the linear function; ② The slope and intercept of the linear function are shown in Table 2; ③ When the score is greater than 100 points, count 100 points, and when the score is less than 0 points, count 0 points; ④ If there is no standard for the index, the evaluation score is uniformly 80 points, such as ventilation rate, etc.

[0022] 1-2, constructing the linear function relationship of the evaluation elements Taking the index score in Table 2 as the ordinate and the index value as the abscissa, linear fitting is performed according to 60 points and 100 points and their corresponding index values, and the stability index of the rolling comprehensive quality evaluation element is calculated according to the linear function. When the score is less than 0 points, count 0 points; when the score is greater than 100 points, count 100 points. The slope and intercept of the linear function of the rolling comprehensive quality evaluation element are shown in Table 2.

[0023] (1) In the formula: - stability index of i element; - slope of i element; - intercept of i element; - detection value of i element.

[0024]

[0025] 1-3, Establishing a comprehensive quality evaluation method for cigarette rolling The comprehensive quality parameters and indexes of cigarette rolling are shown in Table 3, and the calculation method of the stability index is shown in formula (2).

[0026] (2) In the formula: - stability index of each element; - weight of each element.

[0027] 1-4, Evaluation data The results of the quality evaluation of 36 batches of cigarette rolling produced in August and September 2025 for a certain specification of the Haoma brand.

[0028]

[0029] Step 2, Based on the application of box-type cut tobacco technology, establish a batch management mechanism corresponding to five pairs of cigarette cut tobacco, cigarette rolling, cigarette finished product sampling, quality detection, and sensory quality evaluation batches; Step 3, Establish a method for correlating sensory quality and cigarette rolling quality for abnormal cigarette batches in sensory evaluation.

[0030] 3-1, According to the influence on sensory evaluation and sensory quality, divide into two categories of direct correlation and indirect correlation indexes. The correlation relationship indexes are shown in Table 4.

[0031]

[0032] 3-2, Find the influencing factors and sort the problem batches. All the sub-item indexes below the total score of the cigarette rolling evaluation of this batch are listed and sorted from low to high according to the score. The correlation relationship sorting is shown in Table 5.

[0033] 3-3, Find the cigarette rolling quality indexes that affect sensory quality.

[0034]

[0035] Step 4: Establish a development method for roll-to-roll quality indicators that affect sensory quality. The process is as follows: The quality indicators affecting sensory perception are summarized as follows: evaluation score → measured index → ​​measured average value → standard value → difference. This process ultimately reveals the indicators, degree, and causes affecting sensory quality, as shown in Table 6.

[0036]

[0037] In summary, this invention provides a systematic and scientific evaluation method for the correlation between the sensory quality and packaging quality of cigarettes. This method establishes an evaluation system comprising 11 comprehensive quality evaluation elements for cigarette production, combined with linear function scoring technology, to achieve a quantitative evaluation of cigarette manufacturing and packaging quality, ensuring the sensitivity and objectivity of the evaluation results. Simultaneously, by establishing a five-correspondence batch management mechanism, it facilitates the traceability of sensory quality to packaging quality, and even to the quality of the tobacco processing process. Furthermore, for cigarette batches exhibiting abnormalities in sensory evaluation, this invention proposes a method for correlating sensory quality with packaging quality, effectively solving the problems of existing methods relying on experience-based judgment and fragmented, unsystematic data. Finally, by establishing a method for developing packaging quality indicators that affect sensory quality, this invention successfully solves the technical challenge of tracing specific packaging indicators for sensory quality traceability, providing a strong basis for addressing issues affecting sensory quality. Therefore, this invention has broad application prospects and significant practical value in the cigarette production field.

[0038] It should be emphasized that the above are merely preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention in any way. Any simple modifications, equivalent changes and alterations made to the above embodiments based on the technical essence of the present invention shall still fall within the scope of the technical solution of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the correlation between the sensory quality and package quality of cigarettes, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Step 1: Establish a method for evaluating the quality of cigarette manufacturing and packaging; Step 2: Based on the application of box-type tobacco storage technology, establish a batch management mechanism that corresponds to five categories: tobacco processing batch, cigarette packaging batch, finished cigarette sampling batch, quality inspection batch, and sensory quality evaluation batch. Step 3: Establish a method for correlating sensory quality with pack quality in cigarette batches that show abnormalities in sensory evaluation; Step 4: Establish a development method for roll-to-batch quality indicators that affect sensory quality.

2. The evaluation method for the correlation between sensory quality and pack quality of cigarettes according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step 1 specifically includes the following sub-steps: Step 1-1: Establish a comprehensive quality evaluation table for cigarettes of different specifications, including 11 evaluation elements, evaluation standards, and weight allocation. Step 1-2: Based on the allocation table in Step 1-1, construct the linear function relationship of the evaluation elements as follows: （1） in, This represents the stability index of element i. This represents the slope of element i. Represents the intercept of element i. Represents the detection value of element i; Steps 1-3: Establish a comprehensive quality evaluation method for roll forming. The stability index is calculated as follows: （2） in, Indicates the weight of each element; Steps 1-4: Evaluation data.

3. The evaluation method for the correlation between sensory quality and pack quality of cigarettes according to claim 2, characterized in that, In step 1-1, the 11 comprehensive quality evaluation elements for winding include: weight deviation, weight deviation, suction resistance deviation, suction resistance deviation, moisture content deviation, ventilation rate deviation, ventilation rate deviation, hardness deviation, hardness deviation, end-burst amount, and end content. The evaluation criteria include: 0 points, 60 points, and 100 points; The weights include 12%, 8%, and 6%, and the total weight of the 11 comprehensive quality evaluation elements for paper production is 100%.

4. The evaluation method for the correlation between sensory quality and pack quality of cigarettes according to claim 1, characterized in that, Step 3 specifically includes the following sub-steps: Step 3-1: Based on their impact on sensory perception and quality, indicators are divided into two categories: those with direct correlation and those with indirect correlation. Step 3-2: Find and sort the influencing factors of the problem batch. List all the sub-indicators that are lower than the total score of the batch's package evaluation and sort them from low to high. Step 3-3: Identify the quality indicators of the roll package that affect sensory quality.

5. The evaluation method for the correlation between sensory quality and pack quality of cigarettes according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step 4, the development method is as follows: The process involves: quality indicators affecting sensory perception → evaluation scores → measured indicators → measured average values ​​→ standard values ​​→ differences, ultimately revealing the indicators, degree, and causes affecting sensory quality.

Images