A synchronous lifting control system and method for a cap beam construction platform using a winch

Abstract

This invention discloses a synchronous lifting control system and method for a girder construction platform using a winch, specifically relating to the field of synchronous lifting control technology for construction platforms. The system includes a platform body, lifting point connectors, guide components, and a stopping component. The lifting point connectors are connected to the corresponding lifting point winch ropes, the guide components are positioned against the outer side of the pier column, and the stopping component maintains the stopping relationship from the previous round and outputs the stopping positions of each lifting point, the abutment positions of each guide component, and the platform's stopping posture. The system also includes a winch, a drum, a drive unit, a braking unit, and a detection unit. The drum is connected to the corresponding lifting point winch rope, and the drive unit is connected to the drum via a transmission mechanism. By performing inheritance verification on the stopping relationships of each lifting point, the guide abutment relationships, and the lifting connection relationships after the previous round of stopping before the next round of lifting, and by first eliminating errors and making adjustments in a non-inherited state before generating the synchronous lifting control content, continuous synchronous connection during multiple rounds of lifting of the girder construction platform can be achieved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of synchronous lifting control technology for construction platforms, and more specifically, to a synchronous lifting control system and method for a girder construction platform utilizing a winch. Background Technology

[0002] In bridge construction where winches are used to drive the cap beam construction platform to rise and fall along the pier position, the current focus is mainly on ensuring that the actions of each lifting point are coordinated during the current rise or fall, that the platform posture is not unstable, and that it can stop reliably after reaching the position. In practice, the position information, start / stop status, braking status, or synchronization deviation information of each winch are read first, and then adjustments are made based on the current detection results during the current rise and fall. After reaching the stop position, locking is performed, thus completing one rise and fall control. This is consistent with the application direction of winch-driven cap beam construction platform rise and fall as reflected in the briefing document. For example, during the segmented construction of bridge pier cap beams, the same platform often needs to repeatedly go through stopping operations, continuing construction, lifting again, and stopping again around the pier column. The site does not have the conditions to readjust the relationship between each lifting point before each round of operation, nor does it allow for repeated insertion of extra leveling procedures to eliminate minor differences. Instead, it requires that the next round of lifting can directly take over the result of the previous round of stopping and enter the construction rhythm. However, in this continuous use scenario, a phenomenon that can be directly verified often occurs on site: when the platform stops for one round, there is no obvious abnormality, but when it starts to lift again for the next round, there will be situations where one side is stressed first, the other side follows, the local guide is pressed against and weighed down, the platform is tilted in the initial stage of lifting, or the starting of individual lifting points is inconsistent. Moreover, this situation occurs repeatedly in adjacent rounds. The root cause is not that the lifting command for the next round is abnormal, but that there are still differences in rope length, pressure, contact, or tension between the lifting points when the previous round is stopped. The existing handling method treats each round of lifting as a separate and independent action, without further confirming after the stop that the stop has formed a unified lifting preparation state that can be directly taken over by the next round. The technical problem to be solved by this application is: how to check and eliminate the inherited state of the platform after the previous round of stopping when using a winch to perform multi-round synchronous lifting control on the cap beam construction platform, so that the next round of lifting can start on the basis of consistent inheritance relationship of each lifting point, thereby avoiding the platform from losing synchronization in the initial stage of lifting. Summary of the Invention

[0003] To overcome the aforementioned deficiencies in the prior art, embodiments of the present invention provide a synchronous lifting control system and method for a girder construction platform using a winch. By performing inheritance verification on the stopping relationships, guide attachment relationships, and lifting and receiving relationships of each lifting point after the previous round of stopping before the next round of lifting, and by first eliminating errors and making adjustments in the non-inheritance state before generating synchronous lifting control content, continuous synchronous receiving during multiple rounds of lifting and lowering of the girder construction platform can be achieved, thereby solving the problems mentioned in the background art.

[0004] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention provides the following technical solution: a synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform utilizing a winch, comprising: The platform lifting module includes a platform body, lifting point connectors, guide components, and stopping components. The lifting point connectors are connected to the winch ropes of the corresponding lifting points, the guide components are attached to the outer side of the pier, and the stopping components are used to maintain the stopping relationship of the previous round and output the stopping position of each lifting point, the attachment position of each guide component, and the stopping posture of the platform. The winch drive module includes a winch, a drum, a drive unit, a brake unit, and a detection unit. The drum is connected to the winch rope of the corresponding lifting point, the drive unit is connected to the drum for transmission, the brake unit is connected to the drum or the drive unit for braking, and the detection unit is used to collect the rope length change, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement occurrence of each lifting point, and output the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. The inheritance verification module is used to read the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, the stopping posture of the platform, and the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. It compares the order of force occurrence of each lifting point with the order of starting displacement occurrence and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and outputs the inherited stopping result or the non-inherited stopping result. The error correction adjustment module is used to perform reverse unloading on the lifting point where the force appears first, to perform compensation rope winding on the lifting point where the starting displacement appears later, and to perform short-range backtracking and then re-adhesion adjustment on the lifting point corresponding to the guide component whose abutment position has changed when outputting non-inherited stop position results, and output the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point.

[0005] In a preferred embodiment, it further includes: The synchronous lifting module is used to read the inherited stopping result or the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, perform the comparison again, generate synchronous lifting control content after outputting the inherited stopping result, and control the winch drive module to execute the next round of lifting, and output the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform.

[0006] In a preferred embodiment, the platform lifting module includes: The platform body has a stopping reference component at each lifting point and a contact reference component on the corresponding guide component. The stopping reference components on the same side are set at a fixed interval and are used to output the stopping position of each lifting point at the end of the previous round of stopping. The contact reference component is abutted against the outer side of the pier column and is used to output the contact position of each guide component. The platform body is equipped with attitude corresponding components on both sides. The attitude corresponding components and the connecting components of each lifting point are arranged in fixed positions to perform corresponding deployment of each lifting point stop position and each guide component abutment position, and output the platform stop attitude. A back-attachment limiter is provided between the guide component and the platform body. The back-attachment limiter is used to limit the deviation range of the guide component when the attachment position of the guide component changes, and to keep the attachment position returning to the corresponding position of the previous round stop after the platform re-attaches.

[0007] In a preferred embodiment, the hoist drive module includes: The device includes a rope length detector located at the rotation position of the drum, a force detector located on the force path of the winch rope at the corresponding lifting point, and a starting detector located at the connection position of the corresponding lifting point. The rope length detector is used to output the rope length change at each lifting point, the force detector is used to output the order of force occurrence at each lifting point, and the starting detector is used to output the order of starting displacement occurrence at each lifting point. The braking and driving components of each winch are linked in sequence, with the braking components released first and the driving components engaged later. This is used to perform short-distance rope lifting on each hoisting point in sequence before the start of the next hoisting cycle, and to output the rope length change, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement occurrence of each hoisting point during the short-distance rope lifting process. The detection component performs corresponding writing on the rope length change, force occurrence order and starting displacement occurrence order of the same lifting point during the short-distance rope lifting process, and combines them according to the lifting point order to form the inherited response sequence of each lifting point; The brake remains in a released state when the force has appeared at the corresponding lifting point but the starting displacement has not appeared, and switches to a holding state when the starting displacement has appeared at the corresponding lifting point. This is used to enable each lifting point to inherit the response sequence and carry over the process from the previous round of stopping relationship to the next round of lifting relationship.

[0008] In a preferred embodiment, the inheritance verification module includes: Perform co-position expansion on the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, the stopping posture of the platform, and the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. Pair the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence of the same lifting point according to the lifting point sequence. Write the sequence inheritance relationship between adjacent lifting points and the relationship of maintaining the front and rear contact positions of the corresponding guide components into the inheritance candidate set. Constraints are applied to the candidate set to construct edges, forming an inheritance graph. Only candidate edges that simultaneously satisfy the following conditions are retained: no repetition of corresponding lifting points, no reversal of the order of adjacent lifting points, no transfer of guide component abutment positions across lifting points, and no return of the order of platform stopping postures. For each inheritance chain, a verification cost group consisting of the order reversal number, abutment transfer number, and posture return index is calculated. Conflicting edges are deleted sequentially according to the fixed comparison order of the verification cost group until the deletion results of two consecutive rounds are consistent, at which point a stable inheritance graph is output.

[0009] In a preferred embodiment, the inheritance verification module further includes: Based on the stable inheritance relationship graph, forward acceptance verification and reverse closure verification are performed on each inheritance relationship chain. The forward acceptance verification is used to confirm that the force occurrence order of the same lifting point is earlier than or corresponds to the starting displacement occurrence order and that the adjacent lifting points maintain continuous acceptance. The reverse closure verification is used to confirm that the contact position of each guide component before the next round of lifting can be pointed back to the corresponding contact position at the end of the previous round of stopping. Inheritance relationship chains that have not passed both the forward acceptance verification and the reverse closure verification are disassembled and written back to the acceptance candidate set to re-execute constraint edge construction. When the stable inheritance relationship diagram retains only the continuous bearing of all lifting points on the same platform and the front and rear abutment positions of each guide component are consistent, the inherited stopping result is output. When there is a break in the bearing of the lifting point, the order is reversed, the abutment position is transferred, or the platform stopping posture is separated, the non-inherited stopping result is output.

[0010] In a preferred embodiment, the error correction adjustment module includes: When outputting non-inherited stopping results, first read the order of force occurrence, the order of starting displacement occurrence, and the front and rear contact positions of each lifting point in the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. Write the lifting points with force occurrence first, lifting points with starting displacement occurrence later, and lifting points corresponding to the guides whose contact positions change into unloading candidate groups, rope reeling candidate groups, and reattachment candidate groups, respectively. For cases where the same lifting point falls into more than two groups at the same time, perform conflict resolution based on the difference between the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence, the direction of change of guide contact position, and the direction of deviation of platform stopping posture, and output a unique adjustment object group. For the single adjustment target group, a segmented cost adjustment is performed. The reverse unloading amount is taken as the cumulative amount of the drum reverse rotation angle between the time when the corresponding lifting point is subjected to force and the time when the starting displacement occurs. The compensation rope winding amount is taken as the cumulative amount of the drum forward rotation angle between the time when the corresponding lifting point starts to move and the time when the first starting displacement occurs in the same round. The short-distance retraction amount is taken as the cumulative amount of the shortest drum reverse rotation angle from the guide member's retraction position before the next round of lifting to the corresponding contact position of the previous round's stop position. The retention targets are an increase in the number of coincidences between the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence, an increase in the number of coincidences between the guide member's front and rear contact positions, and a decrease in the platform's stop posture deviation. The current adjustment amount is retained according to the rule that the above three results after a single round of adjustment are not inferior to the results before adjustment. Otherwise, it reverts to the adjustment amount of the previous round.

[0011] In a preferred embodiment, the synchronous lifting module further includes: After each round of adjustment, the changes in rope length, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement at each lifting point are re-collected to form an incremental inherited response sequence. The incremental inherited response sequence is then compared with the inherited response sequence before adjustment. For lifting points where force occurs first, it is verified whether the timing of force occurrence has shifted backward. For lifting points where starting displacement occurs later, it is verified whether the timing of starting displacement has shifted forward. For lifting points corresponding to guide components whose abutment positions have changed, it is verified whether the abutment position has returned to the corresponding position of the previous round's stop position. If any of the three types of verifications is not improved, the corresponding adjustment action in this round is deleted, and only the remaining improvement actions are retained. The corrected single-round adjustment result is then output. The corrected single-round adjustment results are subjected to continuous round convergence verification. The adjustment is stopped when the correspondence between the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement remains unchanged after two consecutive rounds of adjustment, the front and rear abutment positions of each guide component remain consistent, and the platform's stopping posture no longer continues to deviate. The corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point is output in combination according to the lifting point sequence.

[0012] In a preferred embodiment, the synchronous lifting module includes: After reading the inherited stop result or the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, the order of force occurrence of each lifting point and the order of starting displacement occurrence, as well as the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, are compared again. When the order of force occurrence of each lifting point and the order of starting displacement occurrence are consistent and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component are consistent, the lifting permission result is output. After the lifting permission result is output, the brake release sequence and drive activation sequence of the corresponding winch are generated according to the order of force occurrence of each lifting point in the inherited response sequence. The synchronous rope winding content of the corresponding lifting point is generated according to the relationship of consistent front and rear abutment positions of each guide component. The winch drive module is controlled to execute the next round of lifting and the synchronous lifting response result of each lifting point is output. The synchronous lifting response results of each lifting point are compared with the inherited response sequence before and after execution. When the order of the starting displacement of each lifting point remains unchanged, the contact position of each guide component remains unchanged, and the platform's stopping posture continues accordingly, the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform is output.

[0013] A method for synchronously lifting and lowering a girder construction platform using a winch, the method comprising: S1. Perform position holding on the platform body, lifting point connectors, guide components and stopping components and obtain the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component and the stopping posture of the platform; S2. Collect data from the winch, drum, drive components, brake components, and detection components to form the inherited response sequence for each lifting point; S3. Read the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, the stopping posture of the platform, and the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. Compare the order of force occurrence of each lifting point with the order of starting displacement occurrence and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and output the inherited stopping result or the non-inherited stopping result. S4. When outputting non-inherited stop results, reverse unloading is performed on the lifting point where the force appears first, compensation rope winding is performed on the lifting point where the starting displacement appears later, and short-distance retraction and re-adhesion are performed on the lifting point corresponding to the guide component whose abutment position has changed. The corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point is then output. S5. Read the inherited stopping result or the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, perform the comparison again, generate synchronous lifting control content after outputting the inherited stopping result, and control the winch drive module to execute the next round of lifting, and output the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform.

[0014] The technical effects and advantages of this invention are as follows: 1. This solution performs inheritance verification on the stopping position, contact position and inherited response sequence of each hoisting point before the next round of hoisting, and eliminates differences in non-inherited stopping positions before allowing hoisting. This relatively avoids the platform losing synchronization due to differences left over from the previous round in the initial stage of hoisting. 2. By comparing the stopping position relationship, the order of force occurrence, the order of starting displacement occurrence, and the front and rear contact positions of the guide components under the same corresponding relationship, the ability to distinguish the rope length difference, pressure difference, and contact transfer source can be improved, and misjudgment caused by judging based on a single deviation can be reduced. 3. For lifting points where the force appears first, reverse unloading is performed; for lifting points where the initial displacement occurs later, compensation rope winding is performed; for lifting points corresponding to guide components whose contact position changes, short-distance retraction is performed before contact adjustment, which can relatively improve the consistency of bearing and the guiding status among multiple lifting points. 4. Constructing an inheritance relationship graph and performing forward inheritance verification, reverse closure verification, and conflict edge deletion in the inheritance verification process can relatively suppress the confusion of hanging point correspondence, order reversal, and mismatch of attachment relationships, thereby improving the stability of inheritance judgment results. 5. Before synchronous lifting, re-verify the order of force occurrence, the order of starting displacement occurrence, and the front and rear contact positions of the guide components, and generate the brake release sequence, drive activation sequence, and synchronous rope winding content accordingly, so that the subsequent lifting rounds are more in line with the actual bearing relationship. Attached Figure Description

[0015] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the system module structure of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a flowchart outlining the method steps of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0016] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0017] Refer to the instruction manual appendix Figure 1-2 The present invention provides a synchronous lifting control system for a cap beam construction platform using a winch, comprising: The platform lifting module includes a platform body, lifting point connectors, guide components, and stopping components. The lifting point connectors are connected to the winch ropes of the corresponding lifting points, the guide components are attached to the outer side of the pier, and the stopping components are used to maintain the stopping relationship of the previous round and output the stopping position of each lifting point, the attachment position of each guide component, and the stopping posture of the platform. In this embodiment, the platform body serves as the load-bearing component. Lifting point connectors are fixed to each lifting point position on the platform body and connected to the corresponding lifting point winch ropes to transmit the winch lifting action. Guide components are fixed to one or both sides of the platform body near the pier and abut against the guide section on the outer surface of the pier, used to limit the lateral sway of the platform body relative to the pier. Stopping components are located at the corresponding stopping positions on the platform body to maintain the platform's stopping position at the end of the previous stopping cycle. Attitude correspondence components are located on both sides of the platform body and correspond one-to-one with each lifting point connector in a fixed position, used to deploy the platform in a stopping posture. Retraction limiting components are connected between the guide components and the platform body to limit the guide components from deviating and maintain retraction. This implementation process includes the following: The basic information for positioning is generated using positioning reference components and abutment reference components as input sources. Positioning reference components located at each lifting point on the platform body are arranged at fixed intervals on the same side, with the fixed intervals taken from the assembly dimensions or assembly calibration values. Abutment reference components located on the corresponding guide components are abutted against the outer guide section of the pier. At the end of the previous positioning cycle, the platform number is used as the corresponding key for the same platform, the lifting point sequence number as the corresponding key for each lifting point, and the guide component number as the corresponding key for each guide component. The current position value of each positioning reference component and the current position value of each abutment reference component are then read. The preceding section number is used; the current position value of the stopping reference component is combined with the corresponding rope length value when the winch rope is locked to obtain the stopping position of each lifting point; the section number is combined with the guide component number and platform side to obtain the stopping position of each guide component; then it is written into the stopping record table in a fixed order; when the current position value of the stopping reference component is missing, the fixed spacing relationship between adjacent lifting points on the same side and the corresponding rope length value when the winch rope is locked are called to make up the difference, and the make-up value is written into the calculation mark; when the stopping reference component does not form a valid stop, the guide component is recorded as not stop and written into the abnormal record item; The platform's stopping posture is formed by uniformly unfolding the stopping positions of each lifting point and the abutment positions of each guide component according to the posture corresponding component. The system reads the posture corresponding component numbers on both sides of the platform body, calls the corresponding lifting point sequence numbers, and arranges the stopping positions of each lifting point on the same side according to the lifting point sequence numbers, forming a sequence of stopping positions on the same side. Then, the stopping position sequences on both sides of the platform are laterally paired according to a fixed correspondence to obtain the relative height relationship between the two sides of the platform body. Simultaneously, the abutment positions of each guide component are unfolded according to the guide component number and the platform side to obtain the lateral offset relationship of the platform body relative to the pier. The relative height relationship and the lateral offset relationship are combined to obtain the platform's stopping posture, and written into the posture record table according to the platform number for subsequent inheritance and verification modules to read. When there is an unattached state, the corresponding lifting point stopping position sequence is retained, and only the lateral offset relationship is recorded as a pending reattachment state. When there is a supplementary calculation flag, the platform's stopping posture is still output, and a reliable flag is written into the posture record table. When the guide component's contact position shifts, the return-fitting limiter performs deviation restriction and return-fitting maintenance. The current contact section number is compared one by one with the contact section number recorded at the end of the previous stop; if they do not match, the contact position has shifted. The return-fitting limiter then restricts the outward displacement of the guide component relative to the platform body. The deviation range is determined by the combination of the guide component's installation gap and the mechanical limit stroke of the return-fitting limiter, which is obtained through a no-load contact test and written into the equipment configuration table. When the platform body re-approaches the pier guide section, the guide component re-enters the corresponding contact section of the previous stop within the path defined by the return-fitting limiter. After return-fitting is completed, the contact section number output by the contact reference component is read again, and the contact position records of each guide component are written back. If the guide component fails to return to the corresponding contact section of the previous stop within the defined deviation range, it is recorded as having a contact transfer not recovered, and the platform number, guide component number, corresponding lifting point sequence number, and current contact section number are written into the anomaly record table. Through the above processing, the platform lifting module forms a unified structural connection relationship and a unified stopping information output relationship; the platform body bears the overall load, the lifting point connectors bear the transmission of the hoisting lifting action, the guide components bear the contact guidance, the stopping components bear the stopping position maintenance, the attitude corresponding components bear the platform's stopping attitude deployment, and the return limit components bear the deviation limitation and return maintenance after contact transfer; thus, the output of each lifting point stopping position, each guide component contact position, and the platform stopping attitude all have a unified corresponding key and a unified value caliber, which can be directly called by the subsequent inheritance and verification module; In practical applications: After the girder construction platform completes one round of ascent or descent and enters the stopping state, the stopping reference component outputs the stopping position of each lifting point, the abutment reference component outputs the abutment position of each guide component, and the attitude corresponding component unfolds the platform's stopping attitude; when the abutment section of the guide component shifts, the return limiting component first restricts the outward deviation, and then keeps the guide component back to the abutment section corresponding to the previous stopping position. Finally, the stopping record, attitude record, and abnormal record are used as inputs for the next processing stage.

[0018] The winch drive module includes a winch, a drum, a drive unit, a brake unit, and a detection unit. The drum is connected to the winch rope of the corresponding lifting point, the drive unit is connected to the drum for transmission, the brake unit is connected to the drum or the drive unit for braking, and the detection unit is used to collect the rope length change, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement occurrence of each lifting point, and output the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. In this embodiment, the hoisting drive state after the previous round of stopping is converted into a unified response result that can be directly used for inheritance verification; each hoist is set up one-to-one with its corresponding lifting point, and the drum is installed on the output shaft of the corresponding hoist or connected to the output end of the hoist through a reduction gear transmission component. The hoisting rope corresponding to the lifting point is wound around the outer circumference of the drum and connected to the platform body through the lifting point connector; the braking component is set on the drum rotation shaft system or the drive component transmission shaft system to control the release and locking of the corresponding drum; the rope length detection component is set at the drum rotation position to read the rope length. The drum rotation angle is calculated and the rope length change is converted; the force detection device is set on the force path of the winch rope at the corresponding lifting point to read the moment when the winch rope changes from an unloaded state to a loaded state; the starting detection device is set at the connection position of the corresponding lifting point to read the moment when the platform body changes from a stationary state to a starting displacement state at the corresponding lifting point; each detection device outputs the detection result with the platform number and lifting point sequence number as a unified corresponding key, and each winch performs short-distance rope lifting in sequence according to the lifting point sequence number and generates the inherited response sequence for each lifting point; this implementation process includes the following steps: First, establish a unified data acquisition path for the changes in rope length, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement at each lifting point to ensure that all response results before the start of the next lifting cycle have the same value caliber. The input quantities are the platform number, lifting point sequence number, the locking status of each winch, and the initial readings of each detection device after the previous round of stopping. The processing actions include: reading the drum angle increment output by the rope length detection device located at the drum rotation position, and converting the drum angle increment into the rope length change of the corresponding lifting point winch rope using the current effective winding radius of the drum. The current effective winding radius of the drum is taken as the radius of the outer layer of the drum at the end of the previous round of stopping. This radius is determined by the equipment assembly calibration value and the number of winding layers at the time of stopping and is written into the equipment configuration table. Read the output value of the force detection device. When the force value of the corresponding winch rope changes from the zero-load interval to the non-zero-load interval for two consecutive sampling cycles, it is recorded that the lifting point has experienced force, and the time of force occurrence is recorded. Read the output value of the starting detection component. When the displacement of the corresponding lifting point connection position changes in the same direction for two consecutive sampling cycles and the cumulative displacement reaches the resolution of the starting detection component, it is recorded that the starting displacement of the lifting point has occurred, and the time of the starting displacement occurrence is recorded. Subsequently, the force occurrence time of all lifting points under the same platform is sorted to form the force occurrence order, and the starting displacement occurrence time of all lifting points is sorted to form the starting displacement occurrence order. The rope length change, force occurrence time, force occurrence order, starting displacement occurrence time, and starting displacement occurrence order of each lifting point are written into the detection record table for subsequent processing. Abnormal or missing data handling is as follows: when the rope length detection component reading is missing, the corresponding winch drive pulse number and drum transmission ratio are used to convert the rope length change, and a supplementary calculation mark is written. When the force detection component or the starting detection component does not output a valid value in the current sampling cycle, the result of the previous sampling cycle is retained and marked as pending confirmation, and it does not directly participate in the current round of order sorting. Then, short-stroke rope lifting is performed through the sequential linkage of the braking and driving components to construct a verifiable connection process from the previous round of stopping relationship to the next round of lifting relationship; the input quantities are the locking status of each winch, the sequence number of each lifting point, the initial test results in the test record table, and the predetermined short-stroke rope lifting amount; the processing actions include: selecting the corresponding winch in sequence from front to back according to the lifting point sequence number, first controlling the corresponding brake of the winch to switch from the locked state to the released state, and then controlling the driving component to be connected after the brake is kept released, so that the drum performs short-stroke rope lifting. The short-stroke rope lifting amount is a uniform small rope length increment or a uniform small angle increment, preferably the small angle increment preset in the equipment configuration table. The value of the small angle increment is based on the minimum verifiable execution amount that is sufficient to trigger the force response and start-up response without causing the platform to be significantly raised as a whole. This value is obtained through whole machine debugging and written into the equipment configuration table; During the short-range rope lifting process, the output results of the rope length detection device, force detection device, and starting detection device are continuously called to record the rope length change, the moment of force occurrence, and the moment of starting displacement occurrence of the current lifting point within this short-range rope lifting. After the short-range rope lifting of the current lifting point is completed, the corresponding drive component is cut off, and the same process is performed on the next lifting point. After all lifting points are completed, the rope length change, force occurrence order, and starting displacement occurrence order of each lifting point during the short-range rope lifting process are output and written to the short-range rope lifting record table for reading when combining inherited response sequences. The abnormal or missing handling is as follows: if a lifting point does not show a force response after the predetermined short-range rope lifting amount is completed, the lifting point is recorded as a no-rope-lifting response state and the lifting point is stopped from continuing incremental rope lifting; if a lifting point shows a force response but the drum rotation angle does not change, the record is written to the abnormal record table for subsequent troubleshooting of drive failure or detection of abnormalities. Subsequently, the detection results of the same lifting point during the short-range rope lifting process are written and combined sequentially to generate the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. The inputs are the detection record table, the short-range rope lifting record table, and the set of lifting point sequence numbers under the same platform. The processing actions include: using the platform number and the lifting point sequence number as the joint correspondence key, extracting the rope length change, the time of force occurrence, the order of force occurrence, the time of starting displacement occurrence, and the order of starting displacement occurrence of the same lifting point, and writing the above fields into the same lifting point response record; then arranging the lifting point response records in ascending order of lifting point sequence number to form the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. Each lifting point's inherited response sequence must include at least the platform number, lifting point sequence number, short-range rope lifting execution order, rope length change value, force occurrence time, force occurrence order, starting displacement occurrence time, and starting displacement occurrence order. The short-range rope lifting execution order characterizes the driving sequence of the corresponding lifting point in this round of short-range rope lifting. The force occurrence order and starting displacement occurrence order characterize the response sequence of the corresponding lifting point when transitioning from a stationary state to a lifting state. After combination, each lifting point's inherited response sequence is written into the inherited response table for the inheritance verification module to directly read by the lifting point sequence number. Abnormal or missing information is handled as follows: when the same lifting point has a supplementary rope length change or a response state awaiting confirmation, the lifting point's response record is not deleted; instead, a supplementary calculation flag or a pending confirmation flag is added to the inherited response table. When the same lifting point has multiple force occurrence times or multiple starting displacement occurrence times simultaneously, only the record that first satisfies two consecutive sampling periods of validity is retained as the sole valid record. Finally, the state switching of the brake components is used to stabilize the connection between the occurrence of force and the occurrence of starting displacement, so as to ensure that the inherited response sequence truly corresponds to the transition process from the previous round of stopping relationship to the next round of lifting relationship; the input quantities are the force occurrence state, starting displacement occurrence state, and the current braking state of the corresponding hoisting point in the inherited response sequence of each hoisting point; the processing actions include: when a hoisting point has recorded the occurrence of force but has not yet recorded the occurrence of starting displacement, the corresponding brake component of the hoisting point is controlled to remain in the released state, so that the force of the winch rope can continue to be transmitted to the platform body without being locked and interrupted again; when the hoisting point subsequently records the occurrence of starting displacement, the corresponding brake component is immediately controlled to switch to the holding state. The holding state is defined as the drive component stopping the forward drive and the brake component re-establishing the lock, so as to fix the current force transmission and starting response correspondence; Subsequently, the braking status switching result, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement occurrence of the hoisting point are written into the inheritance response table, which serves as the direct basis for the inheritance verification module to determine whether the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence are consistent. The handling of abnormalities or omissions is as follows: when the force has occurred but the starting displacement has not occurred within the predetermined observation time, the predetermined observation time is taken as a uniform small time window and is derived from the short-range rope lifting observation configuration value in the equipment configuration table. Then, the hoisting point is recorded as a state of no starting under force and written into the abnormal record table. When the starting displacement has occurred but the force has not occurred, the hoisting point is recorded as a state of abnormal starting and its continued entry into the next round of hoisting permission judgment is stopped. Through the above processing, the connection, action, and detection relationships among the winch, drum, drive unit, brake unit, rope length detection unit, force detection unit, and starting detection unit in the winch drive module are all fixed: the winch is connected to the corresponding lifting point through the drum and winch rope; the drive unit drives the winch rope through the drum to perform short-stroke rope lifting; the brake unit controls the release and locking of the drum rotation axis system; the rope length detection unit records the rope length change corresponding to the drum rotation angle; the force detection unit records the moment when the winch rope is subjected to force; and the starting detection unit records the moment when the starting displacement of the lifting point connection position occurs. The resulting inherited response sequence of each lifting point has a unified corresponding key, a unified time caliber, and a unified writing path, which can be directly read by the inheritance verification module. In practical applications: After the previous round of stopping is completed, each winch first remains locked. The system releases the corresponding brakes and activates the drive unit according to the lifting point sequence number to perform short-distance rope lifting. The rope length detection unit outputs the rope length change, the force detection unit outputs the moment of force occurrence, and the starting detection unit outputs the moment of starting displacement occurrence. When a lifting point experiences force first and then starting displacement, the brakes continue to be released after the force occurs, and switch to the holding state after the starting displacement occurs. This process of the lifting point transitioning from a stopping relationship to a lifting relationship is fixedly written into the inheritance response table. After all lifting points have been executed, the inheritance response sequence of each lifting point in the inheritance response table serves as the direct input for subsequent inheritance verification.

[0019] The inheritance verification module is used to read the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, the stopping posture of the platform, and the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. It compares the order of force occurrence of each lifting point with the order of starting displacement occurrence and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and outputs the inherited stopping result or the non-inherited stopping result. In this implementation, the platform positioning relationship after the previous positioning is completed and the drive response relationship before the start of the next lifting are unified under the same corresponding caliber to determine whether the positioning result of the previous positioning can be directly inherited by the next lifting. The inheritance verification module reads the positioning positions of each hoisting point, the contact positions of each guide component, and the platform positioning attitude from the positioning record table, and reads the inheritance response sequence of each hoisting point from the inheritance response table. First, it performs a same-position expansion according to the hoisting point sequence number and the guide component number, then constructs an inheritance relationship diagram according to a fixed sequence relationship, and then performs a forward inheritance verification and a reverse closure verification on the inheritance relationship diagram. Finally, it outputs the inherited positioning result or the non-inherited positioning result. This implementation process includes the following steps: First, the basic information of the stopping position and the inherited response information are expanded in the same position. This is to map the same lifting point, the same guide component, and the same platform attitude to the same verification record. The input quantities are platform number, lifting point sequence number, guide component number, stopping position of each lifting point, contact position of each guide component, platform stopping attitude, and inherited response sequence of each lifting point. The processing actions are as follows: using the platform number as the unique corresponding key for the same platform, the lifting point sequence number as the unique corresponding key for each lifting point under the same platform, and the guide component number as the unique corresponding key for the corresponding guide component, the lifting point sequence number in the stopping position of each lifting point is aligned with the same lifting point sequence number in the inherited response sequence of each lifting point, the guide component number in the contact position of each guide component is aligned with the platform side, and the attitude correspondence in the platform stopping attitude is expanded to the same record line according to the lifting point sequence number. Then, the force occurrence order of the same lifting point is matched with the starting displacement occurrence order to obtain a single lifting point acceptance record. The order acceptance relationship between adjacent lifting points and the corresponding guide component contact position relationship are written into the acceptance candidate set. Adjacent lifting points are determined directly by their adjacent positions according to the fixed lifting point sequence on the platform body; the front and rear contact positions are maintained based on the consistency of the contact section number; the platform's stopping posture correspondence includes at least the height order of the corresponding lifting points on both sides of the platform and the lateral offset order of the platform relative to the pier; the output is a candidate set, which includes at least the platform number, the starting lifting point sequence number, the target lifting point sequence number, the force occurrence order, the starting displacement occurrence order, the contact section number of the previous round of stopping, the contact section number of the next round of lifting, and the posture correspondence sequence identifier, and is written into the candidate record table for subsequent edge construction reading; abnormal or missing handling is as follows: when a lifting point has a supplementary stopping position or an inherited response identifier to be confirmed, the lifting point record is retained but a reliable identifier is added; when a guide component is in an uncontacted state, the corresponding record of the guide component is directly written as a candidate for non-contacted, and it does not participate in the maintenance relationship establishment judgment; Next, constraint edge construction is performed on the candidate set to filter out valid acceptance relationships that meet the inheritance conditions; the input is the candidate set in the candidate record table; the processing action is as follows: each candidate record is regarded as a candidate edge, the starting point of the candidate edge is the hoisting point sequence number in the previous round of stopping relationship, and the ending point is the hoisting point sequence number in the next round of pre-lifting response relationship; only candidate edges that simultaneously satisfy four constraints are retained, the four constraints are: no repetition of corresponding hoisting points, no reversal of the order of adjacent hoisting points, no transfer of guide component contact position across hoisting points, and no return of the order of corresponding platform stopping posture; no repetition of corresponding hoisting points means The same subsequent response lifting point can only be uniquely corresponded to one previous stopping lifting point; the order of adjacent lifting points must not be reversed, meaning that the lifting point with the smaller sequence number must not be later than the adjacent lifting point with the larger sequence number in terms of the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence; the guide component abutment position must not be transferred across lifting points, meaning that the abutment section of a certain guide component before the subsequent lifting still corresponds to the guide section of the same lifting point sequence, and it is not allowed to be transferred to the guide section corresponding to other lifting points; the platform stopping posture corresponding sequence must not be reversed, meaning that the height order and lateral offset order of the corresponding lifting points on both sides of the platform must not be reversed before the subsequent lifting. Subsequently, a verification cost group is calculated for each inheritance relationship chain. The verification cost group consists of the order reversal number, the contact transfer number, and the attitude return index. The order reversal number is the count of the force occurrence order or starting displacement occurrence order of the smaller lifting point in the inheritance relationship chain being later than that of the larger lifting point. The contact transfer number is the number of guide components with inconsistent contact section numbers. The attitude return index is the number of records where the platform's stopping attitude corresponds to the reverse mapping. Conflicting edges are deleted in a fixed order: first comparing the order reversal number, then comparing the contact transfer number, and finally comparing the attitude return index. After deletion, the inheritance relationship graph is regenerated until the set of retained edges after two consecutive rounds of deletion is completely consistent. A stable inheritance relationship graph is then output and written to the relationship graph record table. The handling of anomalies or missing edges is as follows: when the verification cost groups of two conflicting edges are completely identical, the candidate edge with the smaller starting lifting point order number is retained first. When a candidate edge involves an uncontacted state or an inheritance response flag to be confirmed, the candidate edge is only retained if there are no normal candidate edges. After obtaining the stable inheritance relationship diagram, forward succession verification and reverse closure verification are performed on each inheritance relationship chain. This serves to confirm whether the inheritance relationship is closed from two directions: the response sequence and the contact / return relationship. The inputs are the stable inheritance relationship diagram in the relationship diagram record table, the contact positions of each guide component in the stop position record table, and the inheritance response sequence of each lifting point in the inheritance response table. The processing actions are as follows: For each inheritance relationship chain, a forward succession verification is first performed, checking whether the force occurrence order of the same lifting point precedes or corresponds to the starting displacement occurrence order, and checking the force occurrence order and starting displacement occurrence order between adjacent lifting points. Whether the connection is continuous along the lifting point sequence is checked. If the starting displacement of a certain lifting point occurs before the force is applied, or if a sequential break occurs at an adjacent lifting point, the forward connection check is deemed to have failed. Then, the reverse closure check is performed. Starting from the guide section number before the next lifting cycle, the guide section number is pointed back to the guide section number at the end of the previous stop cycle. Each guide section is checked to see if the guide section before the next lifting cycle can be reattached to the corresponding guide section of the previous stop cycle under the same guide section number and the same lifting point sequence number. If the guide section cannot be reattached, reattached to the corresponding section of other lifting points, or the platform attitude relationship is separated after reattaching, the reverse closure check is deemed to have failed. Inheritance chains that have not passed both forward acceptance and reverse closure checks are disassembled. Each disassembled edge is rewritten back to the acceptance candidate set, and constraint edge construction and check cost group comparison are re-executed. Inheritance chains that have passed both forward acceptance and reverse closure checks are retained in the stable inheritance graph for final result determination. Anomaly or missing information is handled as follows: when the previous round of contact section record of a certain guide component is missing, the corresponding reverse closure check is directly marked as failed. When the force occurrence order of a certain lifting point is parallel to the starting displacement occurrence order, it is considered to be true and no inversion is performed. Finally, based on the retention results in the stable inheritance relationship diagram, the system outputs either an inherited or non-inherited stopping result. Its purpose is to provide a unique judgment result for subsequent error correction or synchronous lifting. The input is the stable inheritance relationship diagram after forward connection verification and reverse closure verification. The processing actions are: checking whether all lifting points on the same platform are uniquely retained in the same inheritance relationship diagram; checking whether each lifting point is continuously connected along the lifting point sequence; and checking whether the front and rear contact section numbers of each guide component are consistent. When all lifting points on the same platform are continuously connected and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component are consistent, the system outputs the inherited stopping result and writes the platform number, inheritance relationship diagram number, and inheritance establishment identifier into the inheritance result table. When there is a lifting point connection break, reversed sequence, contact position shift, or corresponding separation of the platform stopping posture, the system outputs the non-inherited stopping result and writes the corresponding abnormality source, corresponding lifting point sequence number, and corresponding guide component number into the non-inherited result table for the error correction module to read directly. The criteria for determining the breakage of the lifting point connection are that at least one lifting point in the stable inheritance relationship diagram is not uniquely retained or there is no continuous connection edge between adjacent lifting points; the criteria for determining the separation of the platform's stopping posture is that the corresponding order of the unfolded parts on both sides of the platform cannot maintain a unified re-hanging within the same inheritance relationship chain; the handling of anomalies or missing information is as follows: when there is a supplementary stopping position or an inheritance response flag to be confirmed in the same platform but all other checks are valid, the inheritance stopping result can still be output, and a reliable flag is added to the inheritance result table; when the supplementary record or the record to be confirmed directly causes the continuous connection to fail, a non-inherited stopping result is output. Through the above processing, the inheritance verification module unifies the stopping positions of each lifting point, the contact positions of each guide component, the platform's stopping posture, and the inherited response sequences of each lifting point into the same corresponding system. By using the combination of the candidate set of acceptance, the inheritance relationship diagram, the stable inheritance relationship diagram, and the forward acceptance verification and the reverse closure verification process, it completes the verifiable judgment from the stopping relationship to the lifting acceptance relationship. This not only clarifies the specific terms such as co-position unfolding, adjacent lifting points, contact position maintenance, posture reversion, continuous acceptance of all lifting points, and corresponding separation of platform stopping posture, but also fixes the connection relationship between graph construction, cost comparison, conflict deletion, write-back reconstruction, and final judgment. In practical applications: After the current round of stopping is completed, the platform lifting module outputs the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, and the stopping posture of the platform. The hoist drive module outputs the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. The inheritance verification module first performs same-position expansion according to the lifting point sequence number and the guide component number, then constructs the inheritance relationship diagram and deletes conflicting edges. If all lifting points maintain continuous connection and the contact sections of each guide component are consistent, the inherited stopping result is directly output. If the force sequence and starting displacement sequence of a certain lifting point are reversed, or the contact section of a certain guide component is transferred, the corresponding inheritance relationship chain is disassembled and written back, and the non-inherited stopping result is finally output for the subsequent error correction module to perform correction.

[0020] The error correction adjustment module is used to perform reverse unloading on the lifting point where the force appears first, to perform compensation rope winding on the lifting point where the starting displacement appears later, and to perform short-range backtracking and then re-adjustment on the lifting point corresponding to the guide component whose abutment position has changed when outputting non-inherited stop position results, and output the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point. In this implementation, after the inheritance verification module outputs the non-inherited stopping result, directional correction is performed on the corresponding lifting point based on the non-inherited source. This reduces the force difference, starting difference, and contact difference remaining after the previous round of stopping, ultimately forming a corrected inherited response sequence that can be directly accepted by the next round of lifting. The difference reduction adjustment module reads the anomaly source, lifting point sequence number, and guide component number from the non-inherited result table, reads the inherited response sequence of each lifting point from the inherited response table, reads the front and rear contact positions of each guide component from the stopping record table, and the platform stopping posture from the posture record table. First, a unique adjustment object group is determined, then segmented cost adjustment is performed on the unique adjustment object group, followed by a single-round improvement verification of the adjusted response result. Finally, the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point is output based on the convergence verification results of consecutive rounds. This implementation process includes the following steps: First, non-inherited sources are categorized and formed into a unique adjustment object group. The purpose of this group is to map different types of non-inherited causes to the corresponding adjustment actions. The input quantities are the order of force occurrence, the order of starting displacement occurrence, the front and rear abutment positions of each guide component, and the platform's stopping posture in the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. The processing actions are as follows: lifting points whose force occurrence order is earlier than the order of starting displacement occurrence of the same lifting point are written into the unloading candidate group; lifting points whose starting displacement occurrence order is later than the order of the first starting displacement occurrence of the same wheel are written into the rope winding candidate group; and lifting points corresponding to guide components with inconsistent front and rear abutment section numbers are written into the reattachment candidate group. Subsequently, check whether the same lifting point falls into two or more groups simultaneously; if overlap exists, conflict resolution is performed based on the directional difference between the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence, the direction of change of guide component contact position, and the direction of deviation of platform parking posture. The directional difference is calculated by subtracting the order of starting displacement from the order of force occurrence; a positive value indicates force precedence, and a negative value indicates starting precedence. The direction of change of contact position is determined by the offset direction of the current contact section relative to the corresponding contact section of the previous parking position. The direction of deviation of platform parking posture is determined by the height relationship between the two sides of the platform and the lateral offset direction relative to the pier. During conflict resolution, priority is given to retaining directions consistent with the direction of change of contact position and the direction of deviation of platform parking posture. Consistent candidate records; if still tied, the candidate record with the larger absolute value of the directional difference is preferred; if still tied, the candidate record with the smaller lifting point sequence number is preferred; the output is a unique adjustment object group, which includes at least the platform number, lifting point sequence number, adjustment category, and corresponding guide component number, and is written into the adjustment object table for subsequent processing; abnormal or missing handling is as follows: when a lifting point has an inherited response identifier to be confirmed, it is not directly entered into the unique adjustment object group, but is retained in the candidate table for the next round of sampling confirmation; when the attachment position record is missing, only the lifting point is allowed to enter the unloading candidate group or the rope reeling candidate group, and not the reattachment candidate group; Then, segmented cost adjustment is performed on the unique adjustment object group. Its function is to convert non-inherited causes into executable unloading amount, rope winding amount, and retraction amount, and to maintain the improvement direction without reversal within a single round of adjustment. The input quantities are the adjustment object table, the corresponding drum angle record, the time of force occurrence, the time of starting displacement occurrence, the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and the platform's stopping posture. The processing actions are as follows: For unloading objects, calculate the reverse unloading amount, which is the cumulative amount of the drum's reverse rotation angle between the time of force occurrence at the corresponding lifting point and the time of starting displacement occurrence; for rope winding objects, calculate the compensation rope winding amount, which is the cumulative amount of the drum's forward rotation angle between the time of starting displacement at the corresponding lifting point and the time of the first starting displacement occurrence in the same round; for retraction objects, calculate the short-distance retraction amount, which is the cumulative amount of the shortest drum reverse rotation angle required to retract from the current contact section to the corresponding contact section of the previous round's stopping position; all the above cumulative amounts are obtained by sampling and accumulating the drum angle detection values ​​one by one, and the sampling period adopts the unified sampling period of the hoisting drive module; Subsequently, segmented adjustments were performed: first, unloading was reversed for unloading objects; then, short-range retraction and re-attachment were performed for re-attachment objects; finally, rope retraction was compensated for rope retraction objects to avoid increasing the attachment deviation due to retraction before re-attachment. Incremental responses were collected immediately after each type of adjustment was completed, and three retained indicators were calculated: the number of coincidences between the force occurrence order and the starting displacement order, the number of coincidences between the front and rear attachment segment numbers, and the deviation of the platform's stopping posture. The deviation of the platform's stopping posture was calculated as a combination of the relative height difference and lateral offset difference on both sides of the platform after adjustment. The method for determining the value of this combination was... The system uses the fixed combination rules preset in the equipment configuration table. If all three indicators are not worse than the results before adjustment after a single round of adjustment, the current adjustment amount is retained. If any indicator is worse than the results before adjustment, the corresponding adjustment amount for this round is deleted and the system reverts to the adjustment amount of the previous round. The output amount is the retained single-round adjustment amount and is written to the adjustment execution table. The handling of abnormalities or missing values ​​is as follows: when a record of a certain drum rotation angle is missing, the cumulative amount of that lifting point is not calculated and the adjustment of that lifting point in this round is paused. When a driving abnormality occurs during the execution of an adjustment object, the adjustment action of that object in this round is deleted and written to the abnormality record table. Subsequently, a single-round improvement verification is performed on the results of each round of adjustments. This verification confirms whether the adjustments have genuinely improved the corresponding non-inherited source. The inputs are the adjustment execution table, the inherited response sequence before adjustment, and the rope length changes, force occurrence order, starting displacement occurrence order, and contact section number obtained after adjustment. The processing action is as follows: the hoist drive module is invoked to re-collect the rope length changes, force occurrence order, and starting displacement occurrence order at each lifting point, forming an incremental inherited response sequence. Using the platform number and lifting point sequence number as corresponding keys, the incremental inherited response sequence is compared with the adjustment... Before and after the execution of the pre-inheritance response sequence, check whether the timing of the force occurrence of an unloading object has shifted backward. The criteria for shifting backward is that the order of the force occurrence after adjustment is greater than the order of the force occurrence before adjustment, or the order of the force occurrence remains unchanged but the time of the force occurrence is delayed. For rope-reeling objects, check whether the timing of the starting displacement has shifted forward. The criteria for shifting forward is that the order of the starting displacement occurrence after adjustment is less than the order before adjustment, or the order remains unchanged but the time of the starting displacement occurrence is advanced. For reattachment objects, check whether the number of the reattachment section has returned to the reattachment section corresponding to the previous round of stopping position. If any of the three types of verifications is not improved, the corresponding adjustment action in this round is deleted, only the remaining improved actions are retained, and the corrected single-round adjustment result is regenerated; if all are improved, the overall adjustment result of this round is retained; the output is the corrected single-round adjustment result, and it is written into the single-round correction table for subsequent rounds of convergence verification; the handling of anomalies or missing items is as follows: when a certain hanging point in the incremental inheritance response sequence has a pending confirmation mark, the hanging point is only temporarily deferred in this round and is not directly judged as not improved; when a certain posting object has returned to the corresponding section but the lateral offset has not been restored, the conclusion that the posting improvement is established is retained, and the change in the platform's stopping posture deviation is left for verification in the next processing content; Finally, the corrected single-round adjustment results are subjected to continuous round convergence verification. This is to determine whether the conditions for stopping the adjustment and outputting the corrected inherited response sequence have been met. The inputs are the single-round correction tables for two or more consecutive rounds, the records of the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and the records of the platform's stopping posture. The processing actions are as follows: compare the order of force occurrence after the adjustment of two adjacent rounds with the order of starting displacement occurrence to check whether they remain unchanged; compare the front and rear contact section numbers of each guide component in two adjacent rounds to check whether they are consistent; compare the deviation of the platform's stopping posture in two adjacent rounds to check whether it no longer continues to increase in the original deviation direction. When all three conditions are met simultaneously, the adjustment stop condition is determined to be met; if any one condition is not met, the unique adjustment object group and segmented cost adjustment process are called to enter the next round of adjustment; after the adjustment stop condition is met, the rope length change, force occurrence order, starting displacement occurrence order, and corresponding contact section number of the current round are recombined according to the lifting point sequence number to form the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, and written into the corrected inherited response table for direct reading by the synchronous lifting module; abnormal or missing handling is as follows: when the same lifting point has not collected a valid incremental response in two consecutive rounds, the adjustment stop condition is not met; when the guide component contact section is consistent but the platform's stopping posture deviation continues to increase, it is still considered as not converging and adjustment continues; Through the above processing, the error correction module refines the non-inherited stopping results into a unique adjustment object group, and performs directional corrections on different non-inherited sources through three types of actions: reverse unloading, compensation rope retrieval, and short-range backtracking followed by re-attachment. At the same time, it uses single-round improvement verification and continuous round convergence verification to limit the adjustment direction, avoiding the introduction of new order reversals, attachment transfers, or attitude deviations during the adjustment process. In this way, it clarifies the value criteria for the unique adjustment object group, directional difference, platform stopping attitude deviation direction, reverse unloading amount, compensation rope retrieval amount, short-range backtracking amount, single-round non-defect retention, and continuous round stopping conditions, and also fixes the connection relationship between adjustment object determination, adjustment amount calculation, improvement verification, deletion backtracking, and final output. In practical applications: When the inheritance verification module outputs the non-inherited positioning result, if the force on a certain lifting point occurs too early, the starting displacement of another lifting point occurs too late, or a certain guide component simultaneously experiences a shift in its contact section, the error correction adjustment module first writes the three types of sources into the corresponding candidate groups, and then performs conflict resolution to form a unique adjustment object group; subsequently, adjustments are implemented in the order of unloading, then reattaching, and then rope retraction, and the incremental inheritance response sequence is re-collected after each round of adjustment; if the force shifts backward after unloading, the contact section recovers after reattaching, and the starting displacement shifts forward after rope retraction, then the adjustment result of this round is retained; if the correspondence between the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence of each lifting point remains unchanged in two consecutive rounds, the contact sections of each guide component are consistent before and after, and the platform's positioning attitude no longer continues to deviate, then the adjustment is stopped and the corrected inheritance response sequence of each lifting point is output for direct use in the next round of synchronous lifting.

[0021] The synchronous lifting module is used to read the inherited stop result or the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, perform the comparison again, generate synchronous lifting control content after outputting the inherited stop result, and control the winch drive module to execute the next round of lifting, and output the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform. In this embodiment, after the inherited stopping result is established, the previous round of stopping relationship or the acceptance relationship after error correction is transformed into the lifting control content of the next round. During the initial lifting stage, the acceptance relationship is continuously verified to ensure it remains unchanged, thereby ensuring that the girder construction platform is not lifted directly in a state of loss of inheritance. The synchronous lifting module reads the inherited stopping result from the inheritance result table, or reads the corrected inheritance response sequence of each lifting point from the corrected inheritance response table, and calls the front and rear contact positions of each guide component in the stopping record table and the platform stopping posture in the posture record table. First, a lifting permission result is generated, then the brake release sequence, drive engagement sequence, and synchronous rope winding content are generated. Finally, the actual response results of the initial lifting stage are compared before and after, and the synchronous lifting result of the girder construction platform is output. This implementation process includes the following steps: First, the inheritance relationship is reconfirmed to ensure that the next round of lifting is based on the established relationship. The input is the inherited stopping result or the corrected inheritance response sequence of each lifting point, the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and the platform stopping posture. The processing actions are as follows: when the inherited stopping result is read, the inheritance establishment identifier and the corresponding inheritance relationship chain under the corresponding platform number are directly retrieved; when the inherited stopping result is not directly read but the corrected inheritance response sequence of each lifting point is read, the force occurrence order and starting displacement occurrence order of each lifting point are re-extracted according to the lifting point sequence number, and compared with the contact section number of each guide component recorded at the end of the previous round of stopping. The comparison criteria are: the force occurrence order and starting displacement occurrence order of the same lifting point are consistent with the previous and rear connections, and the contact section number of the same guide component before the next round of lifting is consistent with the contact section number at the end of the previous round of stopping. If all lifting points meet the requirement that the force occurrence order is consistent with the starting displacement occurrence order, and all guide components meet the requirement that the front and rear abutment positions are consistent, then a lifting permit result is output, and the platform number, permit time, and corresponding inheritance relationship number are written into the lifting permit table for subsequent lifting control to read; if the order of any lifting point is reversed, or the abutment section of any guide component is shifted, then a lifting permit result is not output, and the corresponding lifting point sequence number, guide component number, and abnormality source are written into the prohibited lifting record item and sent back to the error correction adjustment module for further processing; abnormality or missing information is handled as follows: if there is a pending confirmation flag in the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, a lifting permit result is not generated; if a guide component abutment position record is missing, the lifting permit under the current platform number is directly determined to be invalid; Subsequently, after the lifting permit result is established, the next round of lifting control content is generated. Its function is to transform the succession order in the inherited response sequence into the executable control sequence of the winch drive module. The input quantities are the lifting permit result in the lifting permit table, the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, and the front and rear contact position maintenance relationship of each guide component. The processing actions are as follows: according to the order of force occurrence of each lifting point in the inherited response sequence, the corresponding winch brake release sequence is generated from first to last; and after the brake component of the same lifting point is released, the corresponding winch drive activation sequence is generated according to the same force occurrence sequence; if there are two or more lifting points with the same force occurrence sequence, the parallel lifting points are sorted by lifting point sequence number from smallest to largest and then simultaneously enter the same release group and the same activation group. Subsequently, based on the consistent abutment positions of each guide component, synchronous rope winding content is generated. This content includes at least the rope winding start sequence, winding direction, and single-wheel winding amount for each lifting point. The winding direction is uniformly the forward winding direction of the drum, and the single-wheel winding amount is taken from a uniform small rope length increment or a uniform small angle increment in the equipment configuration table to ensure consistent execution amounts at each lifting point during the initial lifting phase. The synchronous lifting module writes the brake release sequence, drive activation sequence, and synchronous rope winding content into the lifting control table and controls the winch drive module to execute according to the lifting control table. Each lifting cycle outputs the synchronous lifting response results for each lifting point. The synchronous lifting response results for each lifting point include at least the lifting point sequence number, the time of the initial displacement, the order of the initial displacement, the current contact section number, and the corresponding rope length change value. The handling of abnormalities or missing information is as follows: if a winch fails to complete the drive engagement according to the lifting control table after the brake is released, the lifting point shall immediately stop entering the synchronous rope winding of this cycle; if a guide component detaches from the contact section in the initial stage of lifting, the corresponding lifting point shall immediately stop continuing to perform the synchronous rope winding of the current cycle, and the abnormality record shall be written back to the abnormality record table. Finally, the synchronous lifting response results of each lifting point are compared with the inherited response sequence to confirm that the initial lifting stage has not disrupted the connection established by the previous round of positioning. The inputs are the synchronous lifting response results of each lifting point, the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, and the platform positioning attitude. The processing actions are as follows: using the platform number and lifting point sequence number as corresponding keys, the order of the starting displacement in the synchronous lifting response results of each lifting point is compared with the order of the starting displacement in the inherited response sequence to determine whether the order of the starting displacement of each lifting point remains unchanged; the guide component contact section number re-acquired in the initial lifting stage is compared with the contact section number at the end of the previous round of positioning to determine whether the contact position of each guide component remains unchanged; then, the platform attitude response in the initial lifting stage is read according to the fixed correspondence of the attitude corresponding components on both sides of the platform to determine whether the corresponding order of the platform positioning attitude continues. The determination criteria for the continuity of the corresponding order of the platform positioning attitude are that the height order of the corresponding lifting points on both sides of the platform has not been reversed and the lateral offset direction of the platform relative to the pier has not changed. If all three checks are met, the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform is output, and the platform number, lifting response number, and synchronous establishment flag are written into the synchronous lifting result table. If any one check is not met, the lifting anomaly result is output, and the anomaly type, corresponding lifting point sequence number, or guide component number are written into the anomaly result table. At the same time, the next round of lifting under the current platform number is stopped. The handling of anomalies or missing items is as follows: when the starting displacement of a certain lifting point in the initial stage of lifting is not effectively collected, it is not directly judged as established, but is written as a state of pending confirmation of sequence. When there is a supplementary calculation flag in the platform attitude response, the synchronous lifting result is only allowed to be output when the other two checks are met and the supplementary calculation value does not cause the sequence to be reversed. Through the above processing, under the premise that the inherited stopping result or the corrected inherited response sequence is valid, the synchronous lifting module first completes the lifting permission judgment, then completes the lifting control content generation, and finally confirms that the inheritance relationship has not been destroyed by comparing the beginning and end of the lifting phase. This not only clarifies the comparison object for re-execution of the corresponding comparison, the unique condition for the lifting permission result, the generation rules for the brake release sequence and drive activation sequence, the minimum field of the synchronous rope winding content, and the judgment criteria for the continuation of the platform stopping posture, but also fixes the connection relationship between lifting permission, execution control, and post-lifting verification. In practical applications: When the inheritance verification module directly outputs the inheritance stop result, or the error correction adjustment module outputs the corrected inheritance response sequence of each lifting point, the synchronous lifting module first checks whether the force occurrence order of each lifting point is consistent with the starting displacement occurrence order, and checks whether the front and rear contact sections of each guide are consistent; after confirmation, it generates the brake release sequence and drive activation sequence of the winch according to the force occurrence order in the inheritance response sequence, and then controls each lifting point to perform synchronous rope winding according to the uniform small rope length increment; if the starting displacement occurrence order of each lifting point remains unchanged, the contact section of each guide remains unchanged, and the height order on both sides of the platform is not reversed in the initial lifting stage, the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform is output; if any guide section shifts or any lifting point's starting order changes during the lifting process, the lifting abnormality result is immediately output and the lifting is stopped.

[0022] Furthermore, the present invention also includes a synchronous lifting control method for a cap beam construction platform using a winch, the method comprising: S1. Perform position holding on the platform body, lifting point connectors, guide components and stopping components and obtain the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component and the stopping posture of the platform; S2. Collect data from the winch, drum, drive components, brake components, and detection components to form the inherited response sequence for each lifting point; S3. Read the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, the stopping posture of the platform, and the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. Compare the order of force occurrence of each lifting point with the order of starting displacement occurrence and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and output the inherited stopping result or the non-inherited stopping result. S4. When outputting non-inherited stop results, reverse unloading is performed on the lifting point where the force appears first, compensation rope winding is performed on the lifting point where the starting displacement appears later, and short-distance retraction and re-adhesion are performed on the lifting point corresponding to the guide component whose abutment position has changed. The corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point is then output. S5. Read the inherited stopping result or the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, perform the comparison again, generate synchronous lifting control content after outputting the inherited stopping result, and control the winch drive module to execute the next round of lifting, and output the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform.

[0023] Working Principle: Before each round of lifting of the girder construction platform, this scheme first determines whether the previous round's positioning result can be directly inherited in the next round, rather than lifting directly as soon as the platform stops. Specifically, the platform lifting module first provides the positioning positions of each lifting point, the contact positions of each guide component, and the platform's positioning posture. The winch drive module then collects the rope length changes, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement occurrence at each lifting point through short-distance rope lifting, forming an inheritance response sequence for each lifting point. Subsequently, the inheritance verification module compares the positioning relationship and the pre-lifting response relationship under the same correspondence to determine whether the previous round's positioning result can be directly inherited in the next round. Whether the previous stop position is an inherited stop position or a non-inherited stop position; if it is a non-inherited stop position, the differential adjustment module will perform reverse unloading, compensation rope retraction, or short-distance retraction and then re-adhesion adjustment for specific problems until the connection relationship between each lifting point is stable; finally, after confirming that the inheritance relationship is established, the synchronous lifting module generates the brake release sequence, drive activation sequence and synchronous rope retraction content according to the actual connection sequence of each lifting point, and re-verifies the starting sequence, contact position and platform posture to ensure consistency in the initial stage of lifting, thereby achieving continuous synchronous control in the multi-round lifting process of the platform; For example, during the construction of bridge pier cap beams, after the platform has stopped for one round, changes in personnel positioning, material overloading, or guide rail contact may cause one side of the winch rope to become stressed first, while the other side starts moving later. While the platform may appear to be stable, if the next round of lifting is initiated directly, it is prone to becoming misaligned from the start. This solution does not immediately lift in such scenarios. Instead, each winch performs a very short rope-raising motion in sequence to check which lifting point is stressed first, which starts moving later, and whether the guide rail has shifted to another contact position. If a lifting point is found to be stressed too early, reverse unloading is performed; if a lifting point starts moving too late, compensating rope retraction is performed; if the guide rail contact position is misaligned, a short retraction is performed before restoring contact. Once these relationships are re-established, the system controls each winch to lift synchronously according to the actual receiving sequence. In this way, the platform does not rely on correcting misalignment after lifting to maintain safety, but rather eliminates problems left over from the previous round before proceeding to the next round of construction.

[0024] The above description is merely a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch, characterized in that, include: The platform lifting module includes a platform body, lifting point connectors, guide components, and stopping components. The lifting point connectors are connected to the winch ropes of the corresponding lifting points, the guide components are attached to the outer side of the pier, and the stopping components are used to maintain the stopping relationship of the previous round and output the stopping position of each lifting point, the attachment position of each guide component, and the stopping posture of the platform. The winch drive module includes a winch, a drum, a drive unit, a brake unit, and a detection unit. The drum is connected to the winch rope of the corresponding lifting point, the drive unit is connected to the drum for transmission, the brake unit is connected to the drum or the drive unit for braking, and the detection unit is used to collect the rope length change, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement occurrence of each lifting point, and output the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. The inheritance verification module is used to read the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, the stopping posture of the platform, and the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. It compares the order of force occurrence of each lifting point with the order of starting displacement occurrence and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and outputs the inherited stopping result or the non-inherited stopping result. The error correction adjustment module is used to perform reverse unloading on the lifting point where the force appears first, to perform compensation rope winding on the lifting point where the starting displacement appears later, and to perform short-range backtracking and then re-adhesion adjustment on the lifting point corresponding to the guide component whose abutment position has changed when outputting non-inherited stop position results, and output the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point.

2. The synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch as described in claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: The synchronous lifting module is used to read the inherited stopping result or the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, perform the comparison again, generate synchronous lifting control content after outputting the inherited stopping result, and control the winch drive module to execute the next round of lifting, and output the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform.

3. A synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch, as described in claim 2, is characterized in that: The platform lifting module includes: The platform body has a stopping reference component at each lifting point and a contact reference component on the corresponding guide component. The stopping reference components on the same side are set at a fixed interval and are used to output the stopping position of each lifting point at the end of the previous round of stopping. The contact reference component is abutted against the outer side of the pier column and is used to output the contact position of each guide component. The platform body is equipped with attitude corresponding components on both sides. The attitude corresponding components and the connecting components of each lifting point are arranged in fixed positions to perform corresponding deployment of each lifting point stop position and each guide component abutment position, and output the platform stop attitude. A back-attachment limiter is provided between the guide component and the platform body. The back-attachment limiter is used to limit the deviation range of the guide component when the attachment position of the guide component changes, and to keep the attachment position returning to the corresponding position of the previous round stop after the platform re-attaches.

4. A synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch, as described in claim 3, is characterized in that: The hoist drive module includes: The device includes a rope length detector located at the rotation position of the drum, a force detector located on the force path of the winch rope at the corresponding lifting point, and a starting detector located at the connection position of the corresponding lifting point. The rope length detector is used to output the rope length change at each lifting point, the force detector is used to output the order of force occurrence at each lifting point, and the starting detector is used to output the order of starting displacement occurrence at each lifting point. The braking and driving components of each winch are linked in sequence, with the braking components released first and the driving components engaged later. This is used to perform short-distance rope lifting on each hoisting point in sequence before the start of the next hoisting cycle, and to output the rope length change, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement occurrence of each hoisting point during the short-distance rope lifting process. The detection component performs corresponding writing on the rope length change, force occurrence order and starting displacement occurrence order of the same lifting point during the short-distance rope lifting process, and combines them according to the lifting point order to form the inherited response sequence of each lifting point; The brake remains in the released state when the corresponding lifting point has been subjected to force but the starting displacement has not yet occurred, and switches to the holding state when the starting displacement has occurred at the corresponding lifting point.

5. A synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch, as described in claim 4, is characterized in that: The inheritance verification module includes: Perform co-position expansion on the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, the stopping posture of the platform, and the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. Pair the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence of the same lifting point according to the lifting point sequence. Write the sequence inheritance relationship between adjacent lifting points and the relationship of maintaining the front and rear contact positions of the corresponding guide components into the inheritance candidate set. Constraints are applied to the candidate set to construct edges, forming an inheritance graph. Only candidate edges that simultaneously satisfy the following conditions are retained: no repetition of corresponding lifting points, no reversal of the order of adjacent lifting points, no transfer of guide component abutment positions across lifting points, and no return of the order of platform stopping postures. For each inheritance chain, a verification cost group consisting of the order reversal number, abutment transfer number, and posture return index is calculated. Conflicting edges are deleted sequentially according to the fixed comparison order of the verification cost group until the deletion results of two consecutive rounds are consistent, at which point a stable inheritance graph is output.

6. A synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch, as described in claim 5, is characterized in that: The inheritance verification module also includes: Based on the stable inheritance relationship graph, forward acceptance verification and reverse closure verification are performed on each inheritance relationship chain. The forward acceptance verification is used to confirm that the force occurrence order of the same lifting point is earlier than or corresponds to the starting displacement occurrence order and that the adjacent lifting points maintain continuous acceptance. The reverse closure verification is used to confirm that the contact position of each guide component before the next round of lifting can be pointed back to the corresponding contact position at the end of the previous round of stopping. Inheritance relationship chains that have not passed both the forward acceptance verification and the reverse closure verification are disassembled and written back to the acceptance candidate set to re-execute constraint edge construction. When the stable inheritance relationship diagram retains only the continuous bearing of all lifting points on the same platform and the front and rear abutment positions of each guide component are consistent, the inherited stopping result is output. When there is a break in the bearing of the lifting point, the order is reversed, the abutment position is transferred, or the platform stopping posture is separated, the non-inherited stopping result is output.

7. A synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch, as described in claim 6, is characterized in that: The error correction adjustment module includes: When outputting non-inherited stopping results, first read the order of force occurrence, the order of starting displacement occurrence, and the front and rear contact positions of each lifting point in the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. Write the lifting points with force occurrence first, lifting points with starting displacement occurrence later, and lifting points corresponding to the guides whose contact positions change into unloading candidate groups, rope reeling candidate groups, and reattachment candidate groups, respectively. For cases where the same lifting point falls into more than two groups at the same time, perform conflict resolution based on the difference between the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence, the direction of change of guide contact position, and the direction of deviation of platform stopping posture, and output a unique adjustment object group. For the single adjustment target group, a segmented cost adjustment is performed. The reverse unloading amount is taken as the cumulative amount of the drum reverse rotation angle between the time when the corresponding lifting point is subjected to force and the time when the starting displacement occurs. The compensation rope winding amount is taken as the cumulative amount of the drum forward rotation angle between the time when the corresponding lifting point starts to move and the time when the first starting displacement occurs in the same round. The short-distance retraction amount is taken as the cumulative amount of the shortest drum reverse rotation angle from the guide member's retraction position before the next round of lifting to the corresponding contact position of the previous round's stop position. The retention targets are an increase in the number of coincidences between the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement occurrence, an increase in the number of coincidences between the guide member's front and rear contact positions, and a decrease in the platform's stop posture deviation. The current adjustment amount is retained according to the rule that the above three results after a single round of adjustment are not inferior to the results before adjustment. Otherwise, it reverts to the adjustment amount of the previous round.

8. A synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch, as described in claim 7, is characterized in that: The synchronous lifting module also includes: After each round of adjustment, the changes in rope length, the order of force occurrence, and the order of starting displacement at each lifting point are re-collected to form an incremental inherited response sequence. The incremental inherited response sequence is then compared with the inherited response sequence before adjustment. For lifting points where force occurs first, it is verified whether the timing of force occurrence has shifted backward. For lifting points where starting displacement occurs later, it is verified whether the timing of starting displacement has shifted forward. For lifting points corresponding to guide components whose abutment positions have changed, it is verified whether the abutment position has returned to the corresponding position of the previous round's stop position. If any of the three types of verifications is not improved, the corresponding adjustment action in this round is deleted, and only the remaining improvement actions are retained. The corrected single-round adjustment result is then output. The corrected single-round adjustment results are subjected to continuous round convergence verification. The adjustment is stopped when the correspondence between the order of force occurrence and the order of starting displacement remains unchanged after two consecutive rounds of adjustment, the front and rear abutment positions of each guide component remain consistent, and the platform's stopping posture no longer continues to deviate. The corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point is output in combination according to the lifting point sequence.

9. A synchronous lifting control system for a girder construction platform using a winch, as described in claim 8, is characterized in that: The synchronous lifting module includes: After reading the inherited stop result or the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, the order of force occurrence of each lifting point and the order of starting displacement occurrence, as well as the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, are compared again. When the order of force occurrence of each lifting point and the order of starting displacement occurrence are consistent and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component are consistent, the lifting permission result is output. After the lifting permission result is output, the brake release sequence and drive activation sequence of the corresponding winch are generated according to the order of force occurrence of each lifting point in the inherited response sequence. The synchronous rope winding content of the corresponding lifting point is generated according to the relationship of consistent front and rear abutment positions of each guide component. The winch drive module is controlled to execute the next round of lifting and the synchronous lifting response result of each lifting point is output. The synchronous lifting response results of each lifting point are compared with the inherited response sequence before and after execution. When the order of the starting displacement of each lifting point remains unchanged, the contact position of each guide component remains unchanged, and the platform's stopping posture continues accordingly, the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform is output.

10. A synchronous lifting control method for a girder construction platform using a winch, applied to any one of the synchronous lifting control systems for a girder construction platform using a winch as described in claims 1-9, characterized in that... The method includes: S1. Perform position holding on the platform body, lifting point connectors, guide components and stopping components and obtain the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component and the stopping posture of the platform; S2. Collect data from the winch, drum, drive components, brake components, and detection components to form the inherited response sequence for each lifting point; S3. Read the stopping position of each lifting point, the contact position of each guide component, the stopping posture of the platform, and the inherited response sequence of each lifting point. Compare the order of force occurrence of each lifting point with the order of starting displacement occurrence and the front and rear contact positions of each guide component, and output the inherited stopping result or the non-inherited stopping result. S4. When outputting non-inherited stop results, reverse unloading is performed on the lifting point where the force appears first, compensation rope winding is performed on the lifting point where the starting displacement appears later, and short-distance retraction and re-adhesion are performed on the lifting point corresponding to the guide component whose abutment position has changed. The corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point is then output. S5. Read the inherited stopping result or the corrected inherited response sequence of each lifting point, perform the comparison again, generate synchronous lifting control content after outputting the inherited stopping result, and control the winch drive module to execute the next round of lifting, and output the synchronous lifting result of the cap beam construction platform.

Images