Liquid cell culture media (nutrient solution) for the detection of viable microorganisms with obligatory product damage potential for beer (made with hops) or hop-containing beverages, analyzed in water samples

DE202024002231U1Active Publication Date: 2025-02-20BBGT GMBH
View PDF 3 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
DE202024002231
Authority / Receiving Office
DE · DE
Patent Type
Utility models
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2024-11-21
Publication Date
2025-02-20
Estimated Expiration
2034-11-30
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

Nutrient solution based on water, preferably demineralized water, produced comprehensively, one or more carbon sources selected from glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, dextrins and starch to at least 5 grams / liter; one or more acids selected from phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, citric acid, ascorbic acid, sulfuric acid, acetic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, oxalic acid and lactic acid; one or more protein sources and / or peptide and amino acid sources selected from yeast extract, meat extract, peptone and soy proteins at a minimum of 1 gram / liter; one or more fatty acid sources selected from lecithin, yeast extract, meat extract, glycerin, choline, phospholipids and polysorbate to at least 1 gram / liter; one or more minerals or salts and trace elements selected from sodium chloride, sodium acetate, diammonium phosphate, ammonium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, ammonium citrate, manganese sulfate, dipotassium dihydrogen phosphate and similar substances; one or more inhibitors selected from hop bittering agents (iso-alpha acid), ethanol, carbon dioxide, sulfur and yeast inhibitors (cycloheximide, dehydroacetic acid sodium salt monohydrate); one or more color indicators; and characterized by the fact that the nutrient solution has a pH value of less than 4.5.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[0001] As part of quality assurance, food and beverage manufacturers must monitor their raw materials, ingredients, intermediate products, and finished beverages for microbiological contamination, among other things. A fundamental distinction is made here between so-called hygiene indicators and germs that are obligatory for product deterioration.

[0002] Hygiene indicators are microorganisms that can be detected in a sample and thus serve as evidence of entry into the process, but will have no direct impact on the finished product. Negative changes caused by these germs are not to be expected, as they are unable to reproduce under the product's characteristics. Examples would be coliform bacteria / E. coli, Legionella, bacilli, or enterococci. These cannot grow in beer that has an oxygen-free atmosphere, alcohol, acids or an acidic pH (4.3-4.7), and inhibitors such as hop bittering compounds (iso-alpha acid), but may still be present and thus serve as an indicator of hygiene deficiencies. These germs are also referred to as potentially harmful, as they do not directly damage the product, but have the potential to disrupt the process or are simply prohibited.

[0003] Obligate product-damaging bacteria are those that are usually capable of multiplying in the finished beverage and thus cause or result in a change in or damage to the product. Such bacteria grow under the characteristics present in the sample, despite the presence of inhibitors.

[0004] For example, in beer production, the focus of quality assurance is on so-called beer-spoilage bacteria, which are capable of multiplying under the conditions prevailing in beer. These are germs that thrive in the presence of typical beer substances such as alcohol, many organic acids or low pH values, hop bittering compounds (iso-alpha acid / iso-beta acid), and CO 2 (no oxygen) can still grow. These include, for example, lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus casei, Pediococcus damnosus, or even fermentative yeasts and over-fermenting foreign yeasts.

[0005] The following procedure is currently used for detection in the breweries’ laboratories and contract laboratories: Liquid enrichment of water samples. This involves filling a specific volume of the sample (e.g., 1-200 ml) in a container, such as a laboratory bottle, with liquid nutrient solution. These nutrient solutions often have similar compositional properties to the finished beverage, allowing specific microorganisms to grow using specific selective factors and inhibitors. The goal of this test is to detect as many microorganisms as possible that are harmful to the product. This is done by multiplication and subsequent visual evaluation of the increase in turbidity, microscopically, or via DNA analysis such as PCR.

[0006] In this case, however, the nutrient solutions, and especially the mixtures of nutrient solution and water, are not comparable to the final drink. The main difference lies in the pH value. pH is a crucial value for growth, and since it is also a logarithmic concentration value, it is particularly important.

[0007] For example, if a water sample (typically between 6.0 and 8.0) is mixed with a nutrient medium (pH between 5.0 and 7.9), the pH will be well above 5.0 and thus higher than that of the finished beverages / beers. However, it is often essential to test water samples for germs that are inherently harmful to products, as these waters are used for cleaning purposes that come into contact with products or even as an ingredient.

[0008] pH values ​​of a selection of internationally used nutrient solutions for the beverage industry: Manufacturer Product name Purpose PH value Doehler NBB-B Beer-spoiling germs 5,5 Doehler NBB-AM Biofilm formers 5,9 Doehler NBB-C Beer-spoiling germs 6,4 Doehler SSL Beverage-harming germs 5,0 Miscellaneous MRS Lactic acid bacteria 6,2 Doehler Trans-fast Beverage-harming germs 6,1 Difco Micro Inoculum Broth Beer-spoiling germs 6,7 Doemens DS Select Beer-spoiling germs 5,4

[0009] Beverages from the brewing industry and hop-based beverages such as beer, beer mixes, non-alcoholic beer, draft beer, etc. typically have a pH value between 4.3 and 4.7, or even lower. This poses the problem that either bacteria contained in the sample that grow at pH values ​​below 4.8 cannot be detected, or bacteria that would not be able to reproduce in the final beverage grow. In both cases, the analysis must be considered incorrect.

[0010] In the real-life process of industrial laboratories, this regularly leads to deviations, product damage, recalls, and even potential consumer harm. In the author's opinion, there is no evidence available on the market that adequately takes this fact into account.

[0011] Thus, through extensive research, many trials and tests, various recipes and nutrient solutions have been developed that can solve this problem while adhering to certain specifications. Invention for water sampling in the brewery.

[0012] For samples, especially water samples, specific, highly concentrated nutrient solutions with an appropriate pH value have been developed. These nutrient solutions have special properties due to the high concentration of organic acids, hop bittering compounds (iso-alpha acid), ethanol, pigments with pH indicators, and growth factors consisting of carbon sources, nitrogen sources, fatty acid sources, and minerals. When this concentrated nutrient solution is then mixed with water in a ratio of approximately 1:3 to 1:5, the final mixture exhibits properties very similar to beer, i.e., the final product.

[0013] If, for example, 200 ml of standard "brewery water" is mixed with 50 ml of this new nutrient solution, the mixture results in a pH value of approximately 4.3 to 4.8; alcohol content of 2 to 5 vol%, and approximately 10 to 30 EBC bitterness units (hops). This pH value can be visually indicated by a color change of the indicators, making it easier for the user to correctly mix and adjust the desired pH value. This pH value then corresponds to a typical European lager / full-strength beer / wheat beer / ale and thus replicates this type of beverage as closely as possible. This enables the growth of obligatory harmful germs and, consequently, provides correct detection. Surprisingly, only germs that are actually or obligatorily harmful to the product can grow. False results due to the growth of "hygiene indicators" or only potentially harmful germs are suppressed as much as possible and can thus be virtually eliminated.

[0014] The goal is to accurately represent the actual product damage without the influence of hygiene indicators by adding specific nutrient solutions. Processing should also be simplified by adding a high amount of color indicators.

Claims

[1] Nutrient solution based on water, preferably demineralized water, prepared comprising, one or more carbon sources selected from glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, dextrins and starch at least 5 grams per liter; one or more acids selected from phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, citric acid, ascorbic acid, sulfuric acid, acetic acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, oxalic acid and lactic acid; one or more protein sources and / or peptide and amino acid sources selected from yeast extract, meat extract, peptone and soy proteins at least 1 gram / liter; one or more fatty acid sources selected from lecithin, yeast extract, meat extract, glycerol, choline, phospholipids and polysorbate at least 1 gram / liter; one or more minerals or salts and trace elements selected from sodium chloride, sodium acetate, diammonium phosphate, ammonium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, ammonium citrate, manganese sulfate, dipotassium dihydrogen phosphate and similar; one or more inhibitors selected from hop bittering substances (iso-alpha acid), ethanol, carbon dioxide, sulfur and yeast inhibitors (cycloheximide, dehydroacetic acid sodium salt monohydrate); one or more color indicators; as well as characterized by that the nutrient solution has a pH value below 4.

5. [2] Nutrient solution according to claim 1, comprising color indicators which make the growth or multiplication of germs visually visible (color change) and thus simplify the determination and evaluation. [3] Nutrient solution according to one of the preceding claims, additionally comprising color indicators which make the mixing or adjustment of the desired mixture visually apparent (color change) and thus simplify the use. [4] Nutrient solution according to one of the preceding claims, characterized by that as the germs grow or multiply, they can be removed from the sample and further analyzed. [5] Nutrient solution according to one of the preceding claims, additionally comprising that it is filtered or optically clear as far as possible in order to visually simplify the growth or multiplication of germs via turbidity formation or the formation of sediment / precipitates / colonies. [6] Nutrient solution according to one of the preceding claims, characterized by that it has a pH value of less than 4.5, preferably less than 4.3; particularly preferably less than 4.

0. [7] Nutrient solution according to one of the preceding claims, characterized bythat attention must be paid to the high quantity of ingredients during sterilization already during production, for example autoclaving at only 105-115 °C or using steel sterilization or high pressure disinfection in order to reduce Maillard reactions (discoloration) or turbidity or precipitation or other side reactions. [8] Nutrient solution according to one of the preceding claims, which has a particularly effective formulation, is prepared as follows: a. Carbon source with 10 to 100 grams / liter from fructose, glucose and maltotriose; b. Protein sources with 5 to 50 grams / liter selected from peptones, yeast extract, meat extract; c. Fatty acid sources with 1 to 20 grams / liter selected from yeast extract, meat extract; d. Minerals, salts and trace elements selected from sodium chloride, sodium acetate, magnesium sulfate, ammonium citrate, dipotassium dihydrogen phosphate; e. Undenatured ethanol at 2 to 10 vol%; f. Iso-alpha acid from hop extract measured 20 to 60 BE (bitter units according to EBC / IBU); g. dyes selected from bromocresol green, methyl red, methylene blue; h. Demineralized water; i. acids to achieve a pH of 3.6 to 4.2 selected from phosphoric acid, citric acid and ascorbic acid; j. Autoclaved at 110 °C; k. When mixed with water samples in a ratio of 1:3 to 1:5, this produces a pH value of the mixture of 4.3 to 4.8 and thus enables the growth or suppression of certain germs in the sample.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • evidence of beer lactic acid bacteria

    DE1648806A1

  • Method and device for detecting contaminants

    DE3223715A1

  • Culture medium for the detection of zygosaccharomyces

    WO2000073494A1