System and method for connecting interchangeable decorative panels

Abstract

A system for attaching layers of material comprising two independent layers wherein a female layer can be interlocked or connected to a male layer wherein the layers have sequentially arranged interlo

Description

CROSS REFERENCE This application claims priority to United Kingdom application number GB2416876.7, filed on 17 November 2024 and priority to United Kingdom application number GB2405344.9 filed on 15 Apr 2024 which are incorporated herein by reference. FIELD OF INVENTION The present invention relates to a fastening system capable of connecting fragile materials such as paper, flexible / flowing materials as fabrics and / or inflexible materials as metal to one another over three dimensions, whilst retaining the properties of said materials (i.e. not damaging the paper or fabrics) when using the system and methods. The system can also be modified to accommodate for differing weights, thicknesses and other properties of its elements by modifying its modular components. Further described are methods for the manufacture of components for the system, with different components being constructed independently of one another to form a modularised system of systems, having unboundedly recyclable / reusable parts across unbounded embodiments of cross-functional / reverse-compatible base systems. Applications to surfaces are described, with no limit to the fields to which the system and method are applicable, to include toys, fashion, furniture and hardware. BACKGROUND There exists growing demand for sustainably designed consumer goods spanning multiple industries. Within the fashion industry, one solution to existing issues pertaining to unsustainability is the incorporation of sustainable design principles. With regard to fabrics, the prevalent fastening system to fasten two (or more) fabrics to each other is hook-and-loop (velcro) - United States Patent US3009235A, by Mestral, G.D. - however this fails (in standard use-cases) due to: • Limited life-span (irreversibly weakening with usage); • Limited utility (significantly increased weight on applied fabric, leading to issues including but not limited to: negative impacts on the draping of the fabric, folding of fabrics, washing and storage); • Limited security (panels applied with such a system can be removed with a singular force vector); • Limited applications (difficulty with installation and / or removal on non-standard or weakly held e.g. glued surfaces; potential to damage certain fabrics and materials e.g. wool due hook-side velcro latching on); • Limited sustainability (demanding formulations of plastics including nylon and polyester having modified properties or construction preventing standardised recycling methods or practises); • Weight (significant relative increase in weight, particularly if applied to lightweight fabrics e.g. <200gsm cotton, with the weight increasing quadratically (per square meter of fastening fabric); • Lack of suitability for sensitive, fragile or lightweight fabrics: extant systems and methods such as hook-and-loop Velcro (United States Patent US3009235A, by Mestral, G.D.), snap fasteners (United States Patent US1229562A, by Willetts, W.R.), zips (United states Patent US1219881, by Sundback, G.) or similar would generally tear or otherwise damage their application if used to connect materials as strong and heavy as steel or as fragile and lightweight as paper. The described system proposes a solution to existing problems pertaining to: excessive fabric waste, due to users discarding entire garments (rather than modular components having differing lifespans) at the end of the garment's lifespan; affordable customisation, as users may not necessarily need to purchase entirely new clothing, shoes, furniture and more if the primary utility is via a new design (e.g. standardised, blank T-Shirts customised with artwork in the custom fashion sector); speed of delivery, as through the described system, users need not wait for garments, shoes or other accoutrements or furniture to be shipped from abroad to reach them, as not only is domestic manufacturing (of components) enabled via low barrier to entry tools and methods, but it is further possible for users to construct their own modularised components within their homes; and greenhouse gas emissions (and other avoidable climate concerns) due to factors including pollution in garment construction as well as pollution via avoidable international shipping (freight). Additionally, due to significantly reduced costs and timeframes of customisation, users may be afforded a rapidly growing plurality of designs, options and advancements, increasing the potential to meet consumer demand for diverse, personalised goods. Finally, by its very nature the product has been regarded as a toy, thereby providing utility in regards to enhanced fun, education and recreation, particularly for children. What is proposed is a fastening system that provides a novel solution: a fastening system that can be incorporated into fashion or accessories, namely clothing and tote-bags, such that standardised decorative panels, artwork or similar can be affixed and / or removed with ease (directly into the fabric), whilst maintaining a similar weight to the original weight of the fabric, as well as the drape of the fabric, whilst also being internally lockable, such that the panel is internally affixed and cannot be removed without releasing the internal fastening system. Furthermore, the proposed fastening system can accommodate a variety of shapes and forms over three dimensions, whilst being simple to install or remove onto a variety of surfaces. Said fastening system is further compatible with extant fastening systems including hook-and-loop (velcro), such that said systems can be incorporated into it where necessary or appropriate. Additionally, said fastening system does not need to increase in weight quadratically (as a function of the square feet / meters of materials it is applied to), but instead can increase linearly, due to its application capable of being focused on (or limited to) perimeters and / or circumferences of shapes or objects (being a linear function multiplying a perimeter (length) by a constant). Finally, said system is capable of modification(s), such that heavier and / or nonstandard materials (e.g. chain / metal linings) can be applied to their application(s) whilst holding their position and integrity, even in motion. Hence, the ratio between the fastening material(s) and the force vector(s) they are capable of withstanding is generally larger than extant systems having similar application. Hence, the affixed panels provide negligible weight, whilst transforming the appearance of their application and following the physics of the overall fabric to which they are applied, whilst being unified to the application by means of a lightweight, connecting cord alone. Such a system provides the benefits of sustainable interchangeability of decorative panels, without limiting aesthetic appeal, utility or introducing any complex methods or mechanisms that could fail. Furthermore, the proposed system is significantly more affordable to create and install, compared to existing solutions, simply requiring: scissors, fabric, a needle and thread to be implemented (in its core embodiment). Additionally, said system and method can be utilised without the need for small parts, or long, thin strings (which may serve as choking hazards for children), enhancing the safety of the system when used by younger users and children for whom small parts and cords may serve as a safety risk. All parts of the proposed system are designed for child-safety, additionally featuring no necessary sharp or skin-irritating parts (as with hook and loop fasteners) or shapes. Beyond this, the method of application requires minimal dexterity or strength to function, enhancing ergonomics and breadth of application(s). Finally, the system is suitable for integration into industries adjacent to, or intersecting, art and technology, such that-for example-digital artworks can be printed and applied to a wide range of surfaces, including fabrics, curved and solid surfaces, at a marginal cost that is generally far below existing alternatives. In particular, the inserted component of the system provides a marginal cost significantly below comparable systems / methods, given equivalent utility. Hence, the system provides primary benefits by nature of its method(s) of manufacture; wide range of (growing) use-cases; and significantly reduced cost of production, particularly for the most scalable components, leading to (relatively) reduced price(s) facing the consumer. This has the potential to eliminate the need for a critical mass of users to form for economies of scale necessary for drastic innovation to take place, as critical masses can be formed at singularities via individual users consuming at scale without the need for sharing or co-dependency on other users to increase individual utility (the finished product is self-complementary via affordable, scalable modularisation, requiring no costly complementary products, services or users to increase its intrinsic utility) - lending credence to its many industrial applications. Hence, the cost to scale the respective systems may significantly differ, with applied basesystems (e.g. on hoodies) costing comparatively more than modular components (e.g. decorative panels), such that dozens of modular components can be produced or sold for the same price as a singular base system. As such, a user in possession of an applied base system may independently scale its application without the need to invest in a further applied system (e.g. hoodie), meaning said utility can scale significantly more quickly than extant alternatives, saving customers money and enhancing domestic supply chains and affording sustainable competitive advantages, namely due to the speed and scale by which a domestic firm may adapt to changing market needs, via advancements such as the ability to quickly and affordably manufacturing at scale, without the need to wait for imports. SUMMARY OF INVENTION The fastening system consists of a primary trinity of components: • Firstly, a female arrangement of openings in an article of fabric or similar, wherein each opening is arranged around the circumference or perimeter(s) of the opening and has an internal looped section at each point of fixture; • Secondly, corresponding male arrangement of inserts arranged around the circumference or perimeter of a panel, such that the panel can be placed over the article of fabric and (weakly) interlocked to the article of fabric via said openings, wherein said panel has dimensions in alignment with those of the circumference or perimeter around openings in the article of fabric, and said inserts have looped sections of similar diameter to the internal looped sections within the article of fabric; • Finally, a cord or inserted component, having a preferred diameter less than the diameter of both said looped sections, such that the cord can be inserted into the looped sections by means of hand, needle or similar, from the inside, in order to connect the male end of the system to the female end, forming a trinity held together as one unit. Furthermore, said cord may feature one or more additional sections intended for the purpose of interlinking one cord to another, via the ends of the cords or similarly inserted material, such that each cord or inserted material repeatedly interlinks with reciprocal cords - independently of the looped sections from which each extends and is inserted. Additionally, said cord may feature one or more sections intended for the purpose of its interlocking with a looped section, such that the cord can be provided stability, particularly when holding its connected panel against gravity, without support underneath (e.g. in vertical axis of a system orthogonal to the ground, such as when applied to an article of clothing with the user standing up). In a basic embodiment and method, a decorative panel is inserted to a reciprocal opening, itself being interlocked with said panel via a matrix (or lattice) of looped sections (via the (xy axis); which are then interlinked by means of said cord or similar (in the xy axis); which (cords) are then interlinked to one another at corresponding ends (xy axis); which (interlinked, interlocked system (overlain via xy,z axis)), is then interlocked underneath a protective border or casing to prevent the interlinked cords moving in the ^-axis (via the vertices of the system). As such, the interchangeable decorative panels are made modular, being swappable using said components, with the connectors (cords) themselves made modular, being interchangeable to modify for: strength, size, physics properties (e.g. applicable tension), and general sustainability (replacement at end of life-cycle). By means of modifying arrangements of connecting components, a method for which will be detailed further, a plurality of shapes can be formed - across varying planes (x,^) - extending the base application beyond the depicted two-dimensional matrix. 5 PREFERRED ASPECTS In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a plurality of inserted (male) panels can be constituted of any suitable material such that the panels can be cut by means of machine-assisted technology, such that a singular section of fabric or similar can be cut at once, then folded at its ends to create the necessary loops, following which the loops would be stitched into the fabric along a line between the edge of the loop and the edge of the section of the loop that is folded into the panel. This enables all panels to be manufactured in masse by means of laser cutter, plotter or similar technology, without any loss of precision due to the use of precise mathematical measurements. Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, the material comprising said inserted male panels features one-side of fasten-able material, such as a heat activated adhesive including, but not limited to a polyester fusible interlining fabric. By means of this approach, the looped sections of fabric will remain looped (assuming one-sided adhesion), as the fusing would not affect the inside of them, whilst the matrix arrangement can be bonded together by means of same onesided adhesion. Each section of fabric would link to that above (below) itself, and the combined sections would feature a further layer of adhesive over the top of the non-adhered sections, onto which a decorative panel (e.g. fabric) can be applied and bonded with heat and pressure. In practise, in a preferred embodiment of the method of connection, all layers would be adhered at once (rather than sequentially), by means of heat and pressure. Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, all stripes used with the female end of the fastening system will be stitched underneath the female end, such that the female end protrudes from them, thereby pushing the female-end of the system upwards into the opening created in the fabric that it was inserted into. This would enable the garment to be worn as-normal, despite modification with the fastening system, as the female end is held back into the opening by the layer underneath it created by a matrix / lattice arrangement of (fabric) stripes. In practise, this functions as the inserted panel featuring a matrix of connectors with a decorative panel placed above it, such that the decorative panel protrudes from the matrix. Additionally, in a preferred embodiment, the connecting cord is made of a material such as a natural yarn or fibre, such that it can be woven with ease and causes no discomfort or irritation to the skin (when a garment is worn with the fastener connected underneath), such that the cord forms a natural part of the garment when touched. Alternatively, when the system is cased together, the connecting cord(s) may be made of a plurality of materials, with preference for a lightweight, bendable, strong fabric with strong fabric memory at its ends, such that the interlinked connectors do not easily deform with use. Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, connecting cords feature at least one means to interconnect themselves with a reciprocal connector that is affixed to the receiving panel; as well as at least one means or member to interconnect themselves with one another, which may include any extant fastening system including but not limited to: hook and loop tape, snap fasteners and / or buttons (and reciprocal openings). In contrast, in a preferred embodiment, inserted panels (male-end) are to be stored as scrolls, such that the curvature of the rolled-up panel can be used to assist with the interlocking of the panel to the female-end of the system when being inserted, as it unfolds and rolls into the female end, holding itself in place as the garment is turned inside-out. Said interlocked components would therefore be held together along the ^-axis (via thickness and reciprocal pressure) as well as in the x andjy axes (by sitting inside of the bounded area into which they fit). Moreover, in a preferred embodiment, receiving (cased) panels themselves may feature an adhesive layer on their underside, such that they may be applied to a surface by means of glue, heat, pressure (contact adhesive) or similar. As such, said receiving units may themselves be applied to curved surfaces without losing form. Additionally, said receiving panels may feature a border of suitable material such that the form of the fabric is retained under curved surfaces at its sides, and said border may be (optionally) merrowed to provide the appearance of an embroidery-like finish. Also, in a preferred embodiment, looped connectors that are integrated to the receiving system will have a height - x,y axes - (when flattened) strictly less than the height of their overlain border, such that the border extends beyond the maximum height of the connector, thereby hiding the connector (from frontal view) underneath it, leaving the decorative or otherwise aesthetic / visual aspect of the scroll (i.e. a design) to be seen. In a preferred embodiment, materials utilised will be modified given the nature of the application, such that freely flowing fabrics would utilise similarly freely flowing materials (such as fabrics with similar properties), and alternate applications as shoes of fixed materials (e.g. calfskin) may utilise heavier and / or more solid materials to match their application (but may utilise freely flowing fabrics if desired). Hence, in general, a preferred embodiment will utilise a fabric of equivalent or greater flexibility and flowing properties than the layer to which it is applied, such that it would more accurately follow the form and / or physics of its applied embodiment. Finally, in a preferred embodiment, systems shall be recursively cross-compatible with one another, such that three-dimensional objects or new surfaces can be constructed by their combination along one or more of the x,y, z planes. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Some embodiments of the present invention are illustrated as an example and are not limited by the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references may indicate similar elements and in which: FIG. 1 Depicts a frontal view of a panel applied to a flat surface, wherein said panel itself has an overlain border of material around its perimeter functioning as a casing for inserted panels, with said overlain border (or casing) having a non-zero (curved) interior border-radius about its internal corners. Said view features an affixed decorative panel on its surface, such that the underlying components are completely covered. FIG. 2 Depicts a top-down view an insert-able panel, in the format of a scroll, having looped sections of material affixed via its underside arranged about the corners of a three by three matrix of squares of equal area. Each looped section features an opening into which additional materials or fabrics can be inserted. Further depicted is the sides of the panel, themselves needing not be uniform or finished (for fabrics). FIG. 3 Depicts a, top-down and exploded view of a linear arrangement of interlocking components via which an inserted panel may be affixed to its application (via looped connectors about its perimeter or circumference). A primary section is fastened to a reciprocal opening in a primary connector, from which at least one inserted component protrudes into a corresponding reciprocal connector, via the looped end(s) of the primary connector. The inserted component protrudes further, finally featuring an additional interlocking and / or affixing mechanism and / or connector. FIG. 4 Depicts a top-down view of an embodiment of an arrangement of the underlying matrix below inserted panels, in square format, wherein two parallel sets of sections of material, each having insert-able, looped openings at their ends are layered on one another, being affixed by suitable means including a stitch about their (joint) perimeter and / or adhesive or similar. Said matrix further features additional means (on its top surface) by which it may be affixed to a panel (as in Fig. 2) to be affixed on top of it, such as contact adhesive(s). FIG. 5 Depicts a top-down view of a panel into which insert-able panels are to be affixed, not including the bordering layer of material, and including two sets of linear connectors affixed to one another at the internal vertex of the bordering quadrilateral. Further depicted are two unused connectors into which a further combination of (identical or differing) reciprocal connectors may be inserted and / or affixed to their application. A stich line about the perimeter of the quadrilateral depicts the means (stitch) by which the (looped) connectors may be affixed to their application (panel). Finally, the surface of said panel is empty, featuring a standardised fabric and / or design on its primary (base) surface, over which insert-able panels may be placed. Said panel is applied to a flat surface. FIG. 6 Depicts a top-down view of a standardised connector into which a reciprocal inserted length of material may be installed to complete the linear arrangement depicted in Fig. 3. Said connector features at least two openings or mechanisms: one to stabilise and fasten or affix said inserted length of material; and a following from which said material extends to complete said linear arrangement. FIG. 7 Depicts a frontal view of an insert-able material (connector) corresponding with that depicted by Fig. 6. A primary, extended section is used to affix this connector to its corresponding connector, with two further sections about its ends used to affix the connector to another (compatible) connector of the same kind. Said connector extends beyond the length of that depicted by Fig. 6 and retains its position, orientation and stability once connected. FIG. 8 Depicts an embodiment of a methodology by which two connectors as depicted by Fig. 7 may be affixed to one another on a two-dimensional plane. Each connector interlinks with its reciprocal connector by wrapping the ends of the two connectors into one another. Said depiction features such a connection at a 90-degree angle, about the internal area created by joining to perpendicular lines, as in the corner of the quadrilateral depicted by Fig. 5. Said method may also be described as a knot. Each connector extends further, once interlinked, to continue an unlimited chain of interlinked and / or interlocking connections to one another. FIG. 9 Depicts a frontal view of an embodiment of an externally applied system (as FIG. 1), having a decorative panel installed, applied to the curved face of a cylinder. The applied system follows the curvature of the three-dimensional object, behaving as FIG. 1 on a non-flat surface. FIG. 10 Depicts a top-down view of FIG. 9, applied to the circular cross-section of a cylinder, including markings measuring the cross-section's radius with two further lines orthogonal to the radius, with one crossing the diameter and the other intersecting the outermost part of the radius (from the centre). A system (as FIG. 1) is further applied to this system about a 180-degree side (as in FIG. 9). DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the term "and / or" includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. As used herein, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well as the singular forms, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one having ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and the present disclosure and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein. The present disclosure is to be considered as an example of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to specific embodiments illustrated by the figures or descriptions below. The present invention will now be described by referencing the appended figures representing preferred embodiments. Embodiment l / lll: Application Beneath Dynamic Surfaces via Fabric of Worn Garment. The female end of the system (Fig. 5) is integrated into a garment or article of clothing or a suitable surface such as a hoodie or similar fashion (background, Fig. 1; Fig. 5), (optionally) via a portion of the garment that is cut out of the same garment (1, Fig. 2), then re-affixed via sewing machine or similar (line 6), via stripes arranged in a pre-defined matrix (i.e. locations of 14, affixed underneath the section that has been cut out (area of Fig. 5 or Fig. 1). At each end of each stripe, the stripe's fabric is folded on itself and stitched to itself (as 17, Fig. 4), such that uniform looped openings are formed at the ends of the stipes (Fig. 6; 8, 9, Fig.3). With reference to the garment or suitable surface, the border of the now-cut section of the surface or garment's fabric is then (optionally) merrowed (about border 2, Fig. 1) or overlocked to prevent fraying, before the modified section is stitched back into the garment, solely via the matrix of stripes (line 6, Fig. 5) - this is achieved by stitching directly on or around the overlocked area (2, Fig. 1), such that the areas between the matrix are left empty (5, Fig. 5) - leaving openings in the garment or receiving panel (4, 5, Fig. 5), as the remaining openings define the corresponding matrix arrangement of stripes (13, Fig. 4), into which the male-end of the system (Fig. 4) is to be inserted. Upon inserting and (weakly) interlocking the male-end of the system via the openings now created (Fig. 3), the garment is turned inside out, and a cord (Fig. 7) is woven through the openings of both matrices of stripes (7, Fig. 3; Fig. 5), such that both provide structural support to each other (7, 8, 9, Fig. 3), being held by the cord travelling through all of the openings by means of weave or similar (7, Fig. 3; Fig. 5; Fig. 7). Said cord may then be internally tied (22, Fig. 8; Fig. 5; 18, Fig. 8), such that the bond cannot be broken by pulling the maleend of the system - solely via removing the cord. With this, the male, the female and the cord form a unified trinity (Fig. 3), forming a new garment with near-identical properties to the original garment save for a transformed visual (e.g. Fig. 1 with a new panel at position 1). The (optionally) merrowed or overlocked border (2, Fig. 1) creates the appearance of the inserted male-panel (1, Fig. 2; Fig. 1) itself being merrowed, such that the inserted panel need only be an unfinished / repaired section of fabric (11, Fig. 2) having a new design, appearance or similar to transform the appearance of the overall garment. The effect can be enhanced by the ironing of the garment, to flatten all layers into each other, such that the female end is protected underneath the male-end, having an unbounded plurality of male ends emanating from it. The described system is not limited to utility with fashion, clothing or similar, and may be applied to additional applications, including furniture or similarly solid matter / materials intended to be fastened by similar means of an interlocked and woven trinity of components. A further embodiment follows. Embodiment ll / lll: Application Above Dynamic Surfaces. The following describes an embodiment of the system for dynamic, flowing surfaces, wherein drawings would be insufficient to describe the nature of the system in motion. An alternative via basic mathematical methods is described, where the mathematical methods are used purely for description with direct reference to (descriptions of) physical components of the system, such that each corresponds with a described element. Additionally, a bordering component 16 (Fig. 1) is generally applied to the outermost surface of the system and incorporated for description herein. Said border or similar is generally employed, in place of a treated (e.g. merrowed or folded) perimeter, as in the aforementioned methodology, for the following purposes: • When cutting fabrics, as in the aforementioned, is not a viable option, such as when fabrics are sensitive or intended to be preserved so that an appended system can be removed / replaced without effects upon the base component to which it is applied; • When differing fabrics or materials are being used, as the aforementioned merrowing (or similar) is generally useful for woven materials rather than singular layers, such as moulded materials or fabrics; • When the underlying materials or base are intended to be waterproof, hardy or similar, for example with metals, such that the underlying layer must have no exposure to elements and / or air; • Similarly, when a stronger set of materials (i.e. non-fabric components) are to be incorporated to the system; and • When fabric weight is less important (applying an appended system with a border (Fig. 1) will generally increase weight more than simply merrowing, due to the weight of the bordering material 16 (Fig. 1) being greater than that of a merrowing's yarn / thread). As aforementioned, the inserted scrolls need not be inserted to a cut-out selection of fabric(s) or similar; they may instead be applied to a surface via a receiving panel (Fig. 1) having the same properties as the garment described in Embodiment I. In contrast, by means of utilising an adhesive or similar to affix the receiving panel (underside of Fig. 5 or Fig. 1) to its application, the surface need not be cut, enabling utility on solid surfaces that cannot otherwise be turned inside out or suitably cut for the described purposes (for example, ceramics due to fragility, density and solidity). Additionally, rather than merrowing the fabric, a border 2 (Fig, 1) made of a non-fraying fabric, such as faux-leather, may be utilised, itself being stitched or affixed over the system identically (i.e. via 6), such that the arrangement of receiving connectors (14, Fig. 5) may be held underneath it, without the looped sections being inaccessible. Furthermore, the femalematrix or arrangement would be defined by the orthogonally intersecting lines formed by connecting the two parallel connectors 14 (Fig. 5) to each other. Due to the looped sections already being installed to their application (the receiving panel), the area in between (e.g. 23, Fig. 4) need not be necessary, with only the looped formations needed. Furthermore, Fig. 8 depicts an embodiment of a methodology by which two cords or similarly connecting materials (7, Fig.7, Fig. 5, Fig. 3) may be interlinked to one another (via 18, Fig. 7); there need not be a knot to complete the system, as the interlinked parts (Fig. 8) sit underneath the border (16, Fig. 1), preventing escape from underneath the border without user intervention. This interlinking may further involve two tertiary materials in place of 7 (Fig. 8), such that the orthogonal (or linked) elements interlink independently to (an)other element(s). Furthermore, said connecting material(s) (Fig. 7) may be interlocked with the connector into which they are first placed (19,14, Fig. 6, Fig. 3; 21, Fig. 3, Fig. 5, Fig. 7), via an optional mechanism or opening in the looped connector created by cutting an area within said connector prior to (or after) closing it via stitch or similar (19, Fig. 6). The connecting material (Fig. 7) is inserted into the looped connector (Fig. 6) via its ends (18, Fig. 7), with the protruding sections (24, Fig. 7) pulled or pushed outside of opening 19 (Fig. 6), such that the entire connector cannot be slid beyond the boundaries defined by the ends of the opening 19 (Fig. 6) held together by the cross (21, Fig. 7). The proceeding method utilises the exact same inserted panels or scrolls (Fig. 2) via identical arrangements (Fig. 4), such that a user may install the receiving system via multiple methods, whilst maintaining the reverse-compatibility of both systems (both reverse compatible with each other). To accommodate for less standard surfaces (e.g. curved surfaces), simplifying mathematical notation and methodology shall herein be used to describe the behaviour of each figure under their use-cases. With reference to Fig. 4, the matrix arrangement of stripes can be described by the following matrix / graph*: * To clarify the utility the proceeding mathematical descriptions, diagramsand methods, each component corresponds to a real-world component of the system described in the drawings, such that a mathematical approach is used to define aspects including but not limited to, materials, conditions, shapes, surfaces and force vectors necessary to complete an embodiment of the described system and describe its utility in whilst in use and whilst being assembled and / or interchanged (when necessary). Table A Matrix / Graph Depicting Weighted Relative Positions of Material in an Affixed System* Z >2 piF(I(x), I(y)) + p3 Z=3 piF(L2(y), I(y)) + p2 Z=3 piF(Li(y), I(y)) + p2 Z = 3 plF(L2^), 1^)) + p2 Z>2 piF(I(x), I(y)) + p3 Z=3 piF(Lz(x), I(x)) + p2 Z>3 p4 + piF(a) a Ai(x,y, z), A2 Z>2 p4 + piF(b) b Ai(x,y, z), A2 Z>3 p4 + piF(c) c Ai(x,y, z), A2 Z = 3 piF(L2(x), I(x)) + p2 Z=3 piF(Li(x), I(x)) + p2 Z>2 p4 + piF(d) d Ai(x,y, z),A2 Z >1 e Ai(x,y, z), A2 Z>2 p4 +piF(f) f Ai(x,y, z), A2 Z = 3 piF(Li(x), I(x)) + p2 Z=3 piF(L2(x), I(x)) + p2 Z>3 p4 + piF(g) g Ai(x,y, z), A2 Z>2 p4 + piF(h) h Ai(x,y, z), A2 Z>3 p4 + piF(i) i Ai(x,y, z), A2 Z = 3 piF(L2(x), I(x)) + p2 Z>2 piF(I(x), I(y)) + p3 Z=3 piF(L2(y), I(y)) + p2 Z=3 piF(Li(y), I(y)) + p2 Z = 3 plF(L2^), 1^)) + p2 Z>2 piF(I(x), I(y)) + p3 * above is a particular embodiment of a methodology by which a detailed description of the system can be procured, not featuring all possible components. Wherein: Points {a, b ... i} of the system refer to discrete locations (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 4) used to aid in illustration of the behaviour of the system, with said points applying to the overlain component of fabric or similar (i.e. 1, Fig. 2) as well as the underlying matrix (i.e. Fig. 4). Furthermore, each point is defined as part of the set Az, which covers each discrete point to form the full area of an inserted panel (excluding the looped sections, which are wholly underneath the perimeter (16, Fig. 1), such that Az = {a, b, c, d, e,f, g, h, i}. This is applied to a three by three matrix (Fig. 4), but may be extended to alternative arrangements, such that any space can be broken up into discrete areas. As such, to illustrate the continuity of Az, the space defined byAi(x,y, z) represents a continuous (i.e. not-discrete) space along the x,y and z planes, thereby uniformly comprising all points in Az. This is to illustrate that the inserted panels or scrolls (Fig. 2) are capable of motion in three-dimensional space, and that said inserted scrolls need not be fixed in a position whilst in use. This demonstrates that the system is capable of accommodating materials including, but not limited to: fabrics, solids (wherein z would remain constant); and solid and non-solid, non-uniform surfaces (wherein z might remain constant, but vary for each discrete space in Az (i.e. different points along Fig. 2, even when applied to Fig. 1 (1), ora similar representation of the space. As such, given that the perimeter 16 (Fig. 1) is capable of receiving an inserted scroll or panel (via 9, 13 (Fig. 2, Fig. 3), the space or surface bounded by the perimeter need not be flat - assuming insert 7 (Fig. 3, Fig. 5, Fig. 7) is affixed and interlinked (22, Fig. 5, Fig. 8). This would enable three-dimensional objects of differing weights to be appended to their application, protruding from the surface 1 (Fig. 1, Fig. 2), given that the forces around the perimeter can accommodate for them, which would be possible by interchanging Fig. 7 for a suitably strong or otherwise compatible inserted component / connector (7, Fig. 5; or I(x) and / or Variables pi, pz, pz and pi pertain to the forces in the x andjy planes (e.g. friction) - pi - and downward forces U-plane) -pi,pz, pz - 'pushing' on the system (about 16, Fig. 1) by exerting reciprocal force to pressure pushing up against it, i.e. Newton's Third Law, and any inserted scroll or component (e.g. 13, Fig. 2; 7, 21, Fig. 5 - when covered (16, Fig. 1)) whilst in usage, such that said forces, pi, pz, pz and pi, limit the movement of the components of the system underneath them (i.e. 13, Fig. 2; 7, 22,14, 21, Fig. 5). In particular,pz pertains to downward force from the bordering material 16 (Fig. 1) directly towards the base of the system 20 (Fig. 5), along the lengths of the system where an interlinked inserted component (i.e. 7, 22, Fig. 5) is not present, for example at the vertices of the depicted quadrilateral system (Fig. 5). In contrast, pz and pi pertain to said downward force, namely due to weight, tension and downward pressure from the bordering material, at the verticesof a given system (i.e. corners of 16 (Fig. 1)). Forces via pz and pi additionally apply to any overlapped portion of fabric or inserted material (1, Fig. 1), wherein areas having an internal border radius (as around 16 (Fig. 1)) hold the inserted component down further by overlapping the 90-degree angle of the inserted component (Fig. 2)'s corners into areas a, c, g and i, producing further friction, reciprocal pressure (aforementioned) and contact force. Said perimeter forces may further extend to all areas of fabric that are in contact with the border (i.e. set Az, excluding ¢) by extending the area of the insert 1 (Fig. 1) that the border 16 (Fig. 1) overlaps. This is modelled as a uniform force,p4, but in practise would vary with differing border overlaps. Given that the border or perimeter is a continuous material or section of fabric, it is expected that the downwards force at the corners will be greater than along the sides, as the corners are reinforced along both the x andjy axes, preventing the user from pulling the corner freely long the (x, z) space or the z) space relative to the bordering areas between themselves (e.g. above 14 (Fig. 5)). This is reinforced by the increased amount of (relative) stitching or similar border-affixing method (6, Fig. 1) 'holding' the corners in place across two axes, at said corners. Hence, a force vector applied solely in one or the other plane would be counteracted by the unaffected material along an opposing plane, such that the force needed to lift the corner in one or the other plane is generally greater than the force at non-vertex, uniplanar points. Hence, generally, / ?.? >pz, meaning that the average downwards force (per square unit of measurement) holding down the interconnected components at a wholly overlapping vertex (Fig. 8; 22, Fig. 5) of the system will be greater, helping to create anchoring points for the inserted panel (1, Fig. 1), such that it would not 'flap' inwards, losing its position under the overlapped border (for example, via a, c, g or i in the given embodiment) causing the panel when inserted (1, Fig. 1) to lose structural stability and aesthetic value. By this method and through further optional reinforcing mechanisms at the interlinking components of the system (22, Fig. 8), the interlinked components (i.e. Fig. 7) can be converted into anchors to hold the looped area (9, 13, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4) into which they are connected, thereby providing stronger anchoring and support for (the weight of) an inserted material or similar (i.e. Fig. 2). FinaIly,pi applies uniformly across the perimeter, being a force primarily applying to the x and 7 planes, namely friction, helping to hold each component in its position along said x,y planes (for example, by helping to hold each necessary component of Fig. 3 (7, 13, 14, 21) in its intended linear arrangement). As the described perimeter forces are kept within the x andjy planes, this force serves only to enhance them, with the absence of pi representing a system without any overlapping border (i.e. Fig. 5). Hence, as pi increases, motion in the x orjy plane(s) decreases, helping to keep an inserted panel, scroll or component from losing its position underneath the border. This illustrates the role that the border serves in maintaining the dynamic stability of the system, for example when in motion or under forces along the same plane(s) as an inserted panel or component, whilst describing the behaviour of the system under different use-cases with different materials (e.g. low-friction (lower pi}, high friction (higherpi}}. In particular, the border assists with slowing the motion of inserted panels that might bend towards the centre (1 (fig. 2); 20 (Fig. 5)) (i.e. away from the border 16 (Fig. 1)) due to the inserted component Fig. 7 itself being bendable (as in a preferred embodiment). Hence, limiting the movement of an inserted panel, scroll or similar, particularly around the border, is a key function of force pi as it helps to counteract force vectors that would otherwise displace an inserted panel from its position relative to the perimeter of the system. Furthermore, pi, with F representing Force and pi applying toF(a), F(b) ... F(i) (i.e. F(Az) \F(Ai)) represents the force due to friction applying to the fabric in contact with the perimeter 16 (Fig. 1) if the fabric is in motion, for example by being bent. As such, / ? / can be applied as a function of the pre-existing forces affecting the components along the plane to which it applies, meaning that in circumstances where the existing forces of the components described by Fig. 3 (7,13,14, 18) independently withstand high levels of force, the overlapping component (border) 16 (Fig. 1) can be made to be lower in friction with the system maintaining (x, jyJ-plane stability. In contrast, when using weaker components, such as a weak string in place of 7 (Fig. 5), the desired friction on the underside of border 16 (Fig. 1) may be increased, such that force pi utilises the (x, jyJ-plane stability of the looped components (13,14, Fig. 3), in conjunction with added surface friction, to stabilise the system at its borders. Hence, sufficient friction around the border(s) of the system can enable weaker, lighter components to be used within the system, assuming sufficient surface contact area(s); whilst sufficiently strong internal components can afford the user a low-friction, more versatile border for aesthetic purposes - or no border at all, for example by making 7 (Fig. 5) a high-tension, high strength solid material (this is not preferred as it may be expected to reduce ^-axis degrees of freedom by 'locking' the inserted panel into up to three fixed dimensions of space). This may be executed by means of mechanical components such as springs to insert and release extending areas of said high tension solid from 14 (Fig. 5). Z pertains to the protrusion of each area, relative to the base of the system, including the border (20, Fig. 5), such that 7.-2 would be true when there are at least two layers of material, for example at looped sections as depicted by Fig. 6 or 13 and 14 (Fig. 3) - with nothing inserted to said loops (assuming a homogeneous material / fabric throughout), flattened and extending from said base; and Z = 7 representing at least one layer of material (e.g. point e of Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, where only the overlain fabric 1 (Fig. 2) is above the base (20, Fig. 5) when connected to the system (1, Fig. 1). To clarify, the use of “>” implies that the material can be expected move further up into the ^-axis, relative to said base 20 (Fig. 5), for example by stretching, bending or similar, such as at point 22 (Fig. 5), where - as aforementioned - the inserted component 7 (Fig. 5, Fig. 7) is not directly held to the system so can move more freely, particularly at the interlinked corners (Fig. 8). To illustrate the derivation and nature of ^-values and ^-axis protrusion, the following matrix corresponds elements of the system as they are overlain (excluding the overlain border 16 (Fig. 1) and the base of the system 20 (Fig. 5)): 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Fig. 5 (not including base (20)) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1110 0 1110 + 0 1110 0 0 0 0 0 1, Fig. 2 (= Fig. 2 - Fig. 4) 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 + 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Fig. 7 11111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 11111 Fig. 7 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 12 2 0 10 10 2 2 12 2 0 2 0 2 0 Fig. 4 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 12 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 Fig. 1 (not including border (16)) Wherein: • A value of 1 corresponds with a singular layer of material, such as Fig. 7; • A value of 2 corresponds with two layers of material (as looped components 13, 14 (Fig. 3), or, in the final matrix, overlain, interlocked elements as 22 (Fig. 8, Fig. 5)); • Matrix two corresponds with the layer of material 1 (Fig. 1, Fig. 2) overlain on Fig. 4; • Matrices three and four of the calculation correspond to two inserted components as Fig. 7 with a pair along the x-axis and a separate pair along thejy-axis; • For descriptive purposes, all materials are homogeneous, with particular reference to (uniform) thickness; and • The final matrix corresponds with the Z values of Table A (above). By this descriptive methodology it can be further described that systems can be layered one above the other, such that each element of the final matrix would be multiplied by the number of layers, with no upper bound. The base (20, Fig. 5) and overlain border of the system (16, Fig. 1) would then (optionally) be placed, using suitable methodology, such as glue, rivets, nails, stitches or related means. Furthermore, systems can be appended to one another, such that a matrix can exist as a subset of another set of matrices, with each sharing a bordering row or column of the matrix when appended to one another. Furthermore, three-dimensional nets can be constructed by similar methodology, such as by placing two matrices about the left and right side of a given matrix, with one above and two below (all in the x,y axes), in order to form the net of a cube. Said net can then be constructed to a three-dimensional object using the methodology given by Fig. 3, and converted into covers for three-dimensional objects, orthree-dimensional objects in themselves. This methodology can be extended to alternate objects, such that corresponding matrices (e.g. via Fig. 4 or 2; and Fig. 5) can be appended through multiple dimensions to create a plurality of forms, with no limit to the extension of the system(s). Furthermore, it can be seen that the layers adjacent to the interior perimeter or circumference of the system, (3, 3, 3, 2) x 4 would add up to a greater value than said interior perimeter or circumference (3, 2) x 4, such that as the system increases in size, the average ^-axis protrusion of the system would remain highest about the edges, with the interior capable of remaining as simple as one layer of fabric (for example, by extending the area of e, Fig. 4 ), relative to (a, b, c, d,f, g, h and i, Fig. 4), and joining it directly with looped components 13 (Fig. 2, Fig. 4). This shows that for lighter fabrics, compared to alternative systems, this system can limit the total layers, weight or protrusion (i.e. Z-value) from the base fabric as the surface area scales, approaching a limit tending towards the weight or protrusion at point e (1, Fig. 2) (i.e. an overlain layer of fabric). As aforementioned, variables pi and p2 represent the boundary perimeter (i.e. casing) of the system 16 (Fig. 1), which itself applies downward pressure around the perimeter of the system to aid in providing both friction and an interlocking effect between a connected scroll (Fig. 2) and said perimeter (16, Fig. 1). The variable p2 pertains to the force at the corners or vertices of the system (i.e. 22 (Fig. 5)), whereas pi pertains to forces in between, such that the corners of the system, being simultaneously reinforced along two planes (x,y), exert greater downward pressure on the affixed panel (via interlinking at 18 (Fig. 8)) than the remaining lengths, which are more easily pulled upwards (into the ^-axis), travelling along a singular plane (e.g. above point b (Fig. 1)). This is also due to the corners generally having greater surface area (producing friction), due to the internal curvature (border radius) at their internal corners (16, Fig. 1). As such, p2 will generally be a larger value than pi because the downward force (and friction) at the corners of the system, assuming a uniform, homogeneous fabric (i.e. unaltered with no holes or other damage) will be greater than along the lengths, which would more easily be lifted. Hence, when applied to worn fabrics, for example a jumper or similar garment, the inserted scroll will more stably remain affixed to its receiving connector, even at the corners where it may be most vulnerable to losing position (due to no direct affixing to the base (20, Fig. 5) of the system. The increased corner force accommodates for the lack of affixing depicted at looped connector 14 (Fig. 5). I(x) and I(y) pertain to the 'holding' force of the insert 7 (Fig. 5, Fig. 7), itself denoted by I, with the insert functioning on two planes independently in the depicted embodiment (x,j> respectively), such that each component refers to the force on each plane. This is distinguished as in a typical use-case, it is expected that the forces along the x-axis may generally need to be greater than along thejy-axis, due to bending occurring more due to protrusion (e.g. when following the form of the body), such that stronger x-axis inserts may be selected than y-axis inserts; or separate inserts altogether may be selected, to accommodate for differing lengths along the x andjy axes. Furthermore, with use, the / force may differ along different axes due to wear-and-tear, meaning that modelling the long-term utility of each force may benefit from differentiating between one and the other (e.g. horizontal and vertical planes of Fig. 5). This explains the utility and nature of interchangeable connecting components (inserts), such as Fig. 7, and demonstrates that the system can benefit from a plurality of said inserts, such that different inserts, having different properties or fastening methods (e.g. 22, Fig. 8) may be incorporated to the system to modify I(x) or I(y) for differing use-cases (e.g. heavier fabrics, chains or more damage-prone materials). To further illustrate differentiating between I(x) and I(y), a rectangular or non-equilateral system with more interconnections (Fig. 3 extended over a longer range) may need a stronger / force along the plane of the longest side(s) to maintain its stability over length 7 (Fig. 5), for example when using an A4, portrait-oriented system on an article of clothing)). Therefore, differing / forces demonstrate how and why the system accommodates for different inserts (Fig. 7), illustrating mathematically when and why a user may wish to interchange connecting inserts (Fig. 7) and thereby expanding the plurality of use-cases of the system. Around the perimeter, L describes a looped (or receiving) section of fabric (9,13 (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4); 14 (Fig. 3, Fig. 5) into which an inserted connector / (7, Fig. 3, Fig. 5, Fig. 7) is to be connected, and wherein Li describes a primary looped connector (female), as described by Fig. 6 (14, Fig. 5), with Lz describing a reciprocal looped connector (male), described by 9,13 (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4), where two subscripts are used to denote that both connectors are along the same plane, yet differing (i.e. Lix and Lzx being placed on the same (x) axis. In contrast, component / represents the uniform inserted material 7 (Fig. 3, Fig, 5, Fig. 7) and does not include a subscript value as can be a continuous material (as it pertains to the axis into which it is installed). Hence, (Lz(y), I(y)) denotes a reciprocal looped section (13, Fig. 3, Fig. 4) having an inserted material (7, Fig. 3) connected to it, wherein both the loop and the inserted material are connected via the x-axis (i.e. orthogonal to the orientation of Fig. 3). The force vector that they work against is similarly orthogonal to their orientation. Likewise, (Li(y), I(y)) denotes a primary looped section (i.e. connected to the underlying receiving panel (Fig. 6; 14, Fig. 5)) having a connecting material (as aforementioned) now connected via thejy-axis (i.e. coaxial to Fig. 3). Finally, (lx, ly) depicts the point at which two interlinked connectors meet (Fig. 8). As such / travels into a coaxial connector (L), via an intermediary layer of the plane / ^-axis (relative to said looped / receiving components), creating a singular three-dimensional mass (when describing motion) composed of two three-dimensional masses ( / and L} interlocked on the same plane(s). Hence, at these connection points, underlain forces apply to all said components above the base layer (20, Fig. 5) of the system. Hence, assuming homogeneous materials, the total 'holding force' - of inserted scrolls or panels (Fig. 2) to the base system (Fig. 5) of the integrated loops, Li(x) (e.g. 21, Fig. 5) - may be expected to be strictly greater than the force held by the inserted loops, Lz(x), by virtue of the inserted loops being effectively suspended in the system, providing no direct structural support to an inserted component besides via inserts, I(x) and I(y) (Fig. 3; Fig. 7; 7, Fig. 5) and the perimeter pi and p2 (16, Fig. 1) which each 'pull' or 'push' the inserted looped component into the system or around its border (i.e. applying a vector towards the base 20 (Fig. 5) in the ^-plane around the border / perimeter (16, Fig. 1); or a force vector opposite to that in the direction of areas Ai or A2 - such that the inserted looped sections are not easily 'pulled' outside of the boundary of the border, perimeter or circumference of the system (16, Fig. 1) into the 'visible' area 1 (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). Therefore, in a standardised embodiment, F(Li(x)) >Y(L2(x)) meaning that the affixed looped connectors (14, Fig. 3, Fig. 5) provide strictly greater structural support than those solely connected to the panel (13, Fig. 2). As such: i. F(L2(y), I(y)) represents the total force via the interconnecting fastening system (Fig. 3) supporting the inserted component, Fig. 2, at a component of the system featuring an inserted cord, material or similar (Fig. 7; 7, Fig. 3) and a looped or otherwise interconnecting component that is not affixed to the system (13, Fig. 3; Fig. 2, Fig. 4). This force vector is limited to thejy-plane (but can be limited to the x plane), as this would be the plane along which movement would be undesired (e.g. point a of Fig. 1 being pulled down (toward g) such that the inserted panel 1 (Fig. 1) exposes the base underneath (20, Fig. 5). ii. F(Li(y), I(y)) represents the total force via the interconnecting fastening system (Fig. 3) supporting the inserted component, Fig. 2, when a looped or otherwise interconnecting component that is affixed to the system (14, Fig. 3; Fig. 5). Like i., this force vector is limited to the plane(s) specified (i.e.jy orx); iii. F(I(x), I(y) + ps represents the total force via the interconnecting fastening system (Fig. 3) supporting the inserted component, Fig. 2, when two interconnecting inserts, which need not be identical, meet at a vertex or linearly interconnecting point of the system (e.g. interconnecting 18 (Fig. 3, Fig. 7) to a copy of itself in linear series) - this force vector applies in whichever planes the interconnecting fasteners are in themselves; iv. p2 + piF(Li(y), I(y)) and p2 + piF(L2(y), I(y)) (i.e. 2p2 + piF(L2(y), I(y)) + piF(Li(y), I(y))} represents the said total force via the interconnecting fastening system (Fig. 3) supporting the inserted component, Fig. 2, I) and II), wherein a general perimeter force (16, Fig. 1) is applied to the interconnected components, pushing them towards the base of their application (2p2, 20, Fig. 5) and limiting non-uniform movement via added friction, such that as pi increases, the total holding force (towards the base) is increased to help prevent unwanted motion in a given vector; v. 1 <pi <k, wherein k is a constant and pi = 1 would be the equivalent of having no said perimeter or border, as in Fig. 5 (with a scroll (Fig. 2) interconnected and the system complete) - leaving only the forces of components in Fig. 3 to support an inserted panel - which would prevent full utility without a tertiary bordering or otherwise holding force applied, at minimum, to the inserted, interlinking components (7, Fig. 5 , Fig. 5); and pi = k, where k is a maximum, would be the equivalent of having a completely solid perimeter or border, such that a user would be unable to access its underlying components without tertiary mechanism(s) to lift said border; vi. piF(Li(y), I(y)) >piF(Lz(y), I(y)), meaning that fastening components (Fig. 3) featuring an already-affixed looped section are intended to generally provide strictly greater structural support to the system or inserted panels (Fig. 2) than those that are not, assuming: a uniform insert (Hx)} and a border applying a uniform 'holding / interlocking' force (aforementioned) for inserted panels, scrolls or objects (i.e. Fig. 2). An example of an exception to this would be if the inserted loop fabric 13 (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4) is very high in friction relative its reciprocal loop 14 (e.g. Fig. 3), or if a tertiary fastening component is used around the surface are of this loop (this may be desired to make interlocking the components simpler). vii. p4 + piF(d) refers to the combination of forces acting between the perimeter (16, Fig. 1) and the inserted scroll, panel or component (Fig. 2), such that the perimeter interacts with the surface 1 (Fig. 1, Fig. 2) via pressure holding it down - p4 - and friction acting against the edges of the panel (Az, or 1 (Fig. 2), excluding ¢) limiting movement about the perimeter such that a moving panel stays (e.g. fabric with its wearer in motion) within the area beneath the border (principally for aesthetic purposes). The nature of the perimeter or border 16 (Fig. 1) is intended such that when installing a panel (Fig. 2 into Fig. 5), the user has straightforward, ergonomic access to the primary components of the system (Fig. 3), namely the looped connectors into which the tertiary connecting material (7, Fig. 3, Fig. 5, Fig. 7) is inserted. Once the system depicted by Fig. 3 is completed, the remaining step is to interlink said tertiary connectors (18, 22, Fig. 8), which generally requires more dexterity than the insertions necessary to produce Fig. 3, particularly when knotted at 22 (Fig. 8). This can be addressed by the utilisation of a pre-existing fastening system or method, including but not limited to: snap fastener, button, strap and buckle, a knot or similar (e.g. clip or elastic band) at the ends 18 of Fig. 7. Hence, panels receive their strongest (relative) supports at the corners of the system 16 (Fig. 1) and the already affixed connectors (14, Fig. 5), relative to the support from simply inserting an interconnecting material 7 (Fig. 3) into the looped section already connected to the scroll (i.e. into 13, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4). Furthermore, the corners being interlinked in differing axes (x and p), aids with affixing the panel to its receiving connector by helping to prevent unwanted motion of the connecting material (Fig. 7) in the axis it is connected. To further describe this, in a disconnected, linear system (as in Fig. 3), given that the flattened diameters of openings 8 and 9 (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 5) are greater than the width of their inserted component(s) 7 (Fig. 3), assuming that 7 (Fig. 3) can slide up or down, coaxially to the connectors it is applied to, by introducing a new interlinking component (22, Fig. 8), said sliding component 7 Fig. 3) will be held along a new plane (perpendicularly in the case of Fig. 8), limiting its degrees of freedom whilst also increasing its Z-value (i.e. depth or protrusion from the base), making it more difficult for it to: slide back into the plane into which it was inserted; and fit into the loop into which it was inserted, due to greater protrusion. This would all serve to keep the components of the system in place, particularly whilst in motion or forces are applied to it. Hence, the presence of multiaxial anchors (22, Fig. 5) and supports (cornering border 16, Fig. 1) enhances the stability, utility and functionality of the system whilst in use. With this, the nature of the method by which Fig. 7 connects to the reciprocal looped connectors can be mathematically described: a force vector along each side of the perimeter of the system is applied, via line I, which travels through all necessary looped sections along their relevant axes. For an x-axis connection, said vector is first applied via Li(y) (8), with two vectors next being applied to each L2(y) (9) on either side of Li(y), wherein each vector is reflected along the line of symmetry at the centre of (Li(y), I(y)), until line I reaches the end of each section (L2(y), I(y)), wherein, in this embodiment, orthogonally interlinking vectors l(x), l(y) then meet to create a final anchoring point, 22 (Fig. 5). A corresponding method is used in thejy-axis, with the same system extendable to (x, y) systems or connections (i.e. diagonal or curved lines in the (x,y) plane), by extending the degrees of freedom along the (x, y) plane (i.e. using a curved looped connector (Fig. 6; or a curved arrangement in place of Fig. 3). As such, an inserted scroll (Fig. 4) is reinforced by force vectors corresponding incorporating, being a function, or functions of: • pl • p2 • p3 • pl • F(L2(y),I(y)) . F(Li(y),I(y)) • F(Ai) • Z Where pi, p2, ps and pi represent the additional forces supporting the panel via interlocking under border 16 and the friction created at intersecting, freely overlaying areas (i.e. the perimeter, a, c, g and i), and where the resisting force is dynamic, changing as the system is moved, for example when applied to a moving fabric or material creating various degrees of protrusion and / or tension due to the underlying physics of the application and / or motion itself. Furthermore, this enables distinction of materials and their respective properties: loop fabric, and hence its force via Li (i.e. 14 Fig. 3, Fig. 5), does not need to be identical to reciprocal loop fabric Lz, meaning that the user can modify the fabric used in the underlying matrix (Fig. 4) to enhance factors such as flexibility of the inserted component of the system (Fig. 2) without needing to hold all other fabrics homogeneous. This demonstrates that the fastening components underlying the larger inserted component (i.e. scroll (Fig. 2)) can themselves be represented by a plurality of materials, each having differing properties, such that the system can function with inflexible solids, fabrics and other natures of inserted, interlinked components (9, 13, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4) without failing (given that the other variables are modified where necessary to accommodate for the changes). This methodology identifies the aspects of the system that can be modified in order to alter or otherwise vary the tension, strength and weight applicable to the total system. For example, by increasing values corresponding with lx or ly, for example by using stronger materials in this application (e.g. 400gsm leather vs. 220gsm cotton) the interlocking components can be strengthened, enabling the manufacturer or user to utilise a wider range of borders, including with weaker materials, without a noticeable difference to utility; furthermore, increasing the strength of the loop fabric, i.e. Li(y) or Li(x), will generally increase the strength of the hold, increasing the force by which the inserted components can be held, and thereby allowing for heavier materials to be connected to the system (e.g. metal chains); finally, modifying Z can increase the reciprocal force of p2, ps and p4 (via Newton's Third Law, as aforementioned), such that more (reciprocal) pressure is applied downwards on the panel, further holding it in place, further moderated by fabric friction (smoothness). Alternatively, in applications where lightweight, thinner materials are desired, the impact of Z can be understood to reducepz, ps andp4, thereby identifying alternative factors to modify (e.g. loop fabrics, insert fabrics, friction underneath the overlain border). This all aids in identifying and describing the plurality of components, designs and embodiments that the system can incorporate, embody and interchange. Embodiment lll / lll: General Application to Three-Dimensional Surfaces Herein a particular embodiment of a methodology by which a detailed description of the system can be procured, not featuring all possible components is described, incorporating the three-dimensional applications of Fig. 9 and Fig. 10, as well as the aforementioned. Firstly, with reference to Fig. 9: • 29 depicts the circular cross-section of the cylinder to which a system (Fig. 1) is applied, wherein said system wraps around the cylinder, changing positions along the x,y and z axes. • 30 Depicts the surface of the cylinder to which said system is applied, such that the applied system sits above the surface, obfuscating the elements below itself (at base). Furthermore, with reference to Fig. 10: • 26 is a measure of the radius r of the cross-section of the cylinder to which the system is applied.; • 25 refers toAi | Az meaning the surface upon which an inserted component, as Fig. 2, is installed to the general system (Fig. 1); • Line 28 describes a line through the centre of the circular cross-section (i.e. diameter), wherein said centre represents the baseline from which protrusion is to be measured such that, along this line, z = O’, • Similarly, line 27 describes the maximum level of ^-axis protrusion relative to the centre, such that along line 27, z = r (i.e. the measurement of 26). Hence, whilst depicted for a generalised, two-dimensional plane, the given system can be extended to three-dimensional planes, such that a completed system (i.e. Fig. 1) can be placed onto three-dimensional objects (x,y, z planes), such as cylinders. To illustrate, given that Ai = {(0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), (1, 1, 0), (1, 2, 0), (2, 1, 0), (2, 2, 0), (2, 3, 0), (3, 2, 0), (3,3, 0), ... (n, n, k)}, in planes (x,y, z), with each of the first two units representing a position in the (x,y) axis of the plane defined by the area covered by the space formed by unifying the points defined by Az = {a, b, c, d, e,f, g, h, i}, such that each (x,y) value of Ai maps onto each space Az = {a, b, c, ... i}, where Ai forms a continuous area, mathematically extendable to point (n, n, n), whereas Az forms a discrete space intended to be strictly defined by the area of the panel 1 (Fig. 1) placed on top of the scroll depicted by Fig. 4. Furthermore, k is kept constant at Oto represent a flat surface. With this, Ai can be used to describe a plurality of forms, whereas Az would describe the specific form of an embodiment depicted), herein referencing that depicted in Figs. 1, 2 and 4. The final unit represents protrusion in the ^-axis, for example due to a three-dimensional object being placed underneath the system - or being anchored above the system, for example by placing hook-and-loop affixed materials above the scroll / panel described by Fig. 2, causing varying degrees of height / depth along areas Ai or Az. For this embodiment and description, this value presently is kept at zero to represent a flat fabric on a flat surface, as depicted by the embodiment referenced (e.g. Fig.l, Fig. 5), whilst nevertheless representing a variable. Hence, a panel 'wrapped' around the curved surface of a cylinder may feature a modified Ai, such that, in a new embodiment, Ai = {(0, 0, k), (0, 1, k), (1, 1, k), (1, 1, r), (1, 2, r), (2, 1, r), (2, 3, k), (3, 2, k), (3, 3, k)}, where k and r (ref. 26, Fig 10) represent average ^-axis protrusion (from line 28 (Fig. 10)) given each element of Ai corresponds with Az. Furthermore, r represents the radius of the cross-section of the cylinder that is parallel to its two circular faces (i.e. if Fig. 1 were to be wrapped around a fixed, cylindrical and enlarged depiction of Fig. 6) and k represents a constant, which does not need to be the same (constant) in a dynamic system (in motion) or with a differing three-dimensional application (e.g. by placing an embodiment of Fig. 1 around a chord instead of the diameter or using a surface with more randomised ^-axis values (random object)). The given embodiment (Fig. 9) would represent a panel wrapped around the circumference of a cylinder, wherein a chord or line connecting the two furthest ends of the panel in the (x,y) planes (parallel to said cross-section (a circle)) would be parallel to the chord representing the diameter of the cross-section of the cylinder. Hence, using the line along the diameter (28, Fig. 10) as the baseline of ^-axis distance (i.e. z = 0 along said diameter-intersecting line through the cross-section of the cylinder), with the panel placed with one end at one end of the diameter and the other end at the other end of the diameter, the ^-axis protrusion would increase to a maximum point equalling the radius, r, of the cross-section. This demonstrates the utility of the panel in three-dimensional systems and methodology by which it can be applied. In practise, this would be achieved by adhering Fig. 1 to a non-flat surface, for example by means of contact adhesive or similar. This further describes a key aspect of the system: the forces necessary to install a panel about the border or perimeter (Fig. 5) of the system are coaxial to the plane(s) in which the panel is affixed to its application, with the same being true of removal of said panel. This means that, unlike many extant, comparable fastening systems, a given attachment will not require a z~ axis vector that pulls against the receiving component of the system (i.e. upwards from the base underneath Fig. 1 or Fig. 5 - as would be the case, for example, with hook-and-loop fasteners, buttons or snap fasteners) to be removed from a flat surface. Likewise, provided that the insert (7, Fig. 5) is similarly slid coaxially to the planes onto which an inserted panel (Fig. 1) is applied, there would be no presence of a perpendicular ^-axis force relative to the ^-axis position of the panel, such that the underside on a panel affixed to a system (i.e. between 12 and the panel itself (Fig. 1)) does not need to receive any force when the system is in use (or when components are being interchanged). This means that a panel (Fig. 1) can be affixed to any surface, with inserted decorative panels, scrolls or components (e.g. Fig. 2, Fig. 7) being interchanged whilst the panel holds its position, even if said panel is weakly affixed to its application (e.g. via a weak contact adhesive as masking tape or paper glue). With regard to manufacturing, this means that a manufacturer can produce adhesive-backed panels (Fig. 1) to be affixed to a plurality of two-dimensional and / or three-dimensional surfaces with the user being able to re-use and interchange the system for as long as the adhesive lasts. This is in contrast to extant systems, where the 'pull' of the reciprocal ends of a hook-and-loop system, snap fastener, button or similar would act against the holding force of the adhesive, greatly limiting the lifespan of their systems in a comparable embodiment, due to the direct-to-surface holding force being weakened with usage. Similarly, zips do not generally demand ^-axis vectors to be released, however the provided system (Fig. 1) has the additional benefit of not requiring any metals or solid parts, making adhesion via methods such as heat and pressure possible or, at minimum, easier due to the heat and / or pressure travelling through the fabrics (to the opposing end) more easily than (generally) through solids; and making pressure easier to apply due to the ability to use softer materials (where necessary). This means that the provided system can be applied directly to fabrics to be worn, for example via bags, using an iron and a heat-activated adhesive backing, with the system continuing to provide strength to its components whilst not losing strength when inserted panels (Fig. 2) are interchanged. As such, the given system can adapt to varying surfaces, depths, dimensions, weights and materials in static and dynamic contexts (e.g. wearing fashion or filling a bag with randomised objects) whilst following the underlying forms of its application (i.e. varying Ai) and maintaining strength of application, even with lightweight or fragile materials such as paper. To further describe the nature and application of the system, as aforementioned, Z describes the protrusion of the fabrics in the ^-axis, such that for each overlapping section fabric (e.g. a, c, g, i, Fig. 4) and each inserted or looped section of fabric (e.g. 13, Fig. 2; 14, Fig. 5) Z increases by 1 (assuming fabrics of equal weight and depth per square meter i.e. homogeneous fabrics), describing an increase in the ^-axis protrusion relative to the flat base surface 20 (Fig. 5). This is necessary to illustrate the nature of the interlocking of the fabrics once placed in their casing or receiving panel (e.g. via 16, Fig. 1 creating an anchoring point for the interlinked connectors underneath it at 22 (Fig. 5). As Z increases, or as the degrees of freedom of Z increase (via free movement in the ^-axis e.g. at vertices), the coefficient of friction will generally increase via the (freely moving, i.e. non-adhered or affixed) layered areas of material touching more frequently and more closely (e.g. the sides defined by the exposed corners of Ai, via sections a, c, g, i (Fig. 2) underneath border 16 (Fig. 1) and the interlinked connectors 22 (Fig. 8, Fig. 5) under the corners of the border above them 16. For said interlinked connectors (18, Fig. 7; 22, Fig. 8, Fig. 5), the described Z value is defined as: Z >2, whereas the coaxial, non-corner Z values along the perimeter are defined by Z = 3. This is to illustrate the degrees of freedom of the system at interlinked points 22 (Fig. 5). These points are not placed within a looped section of material (7, Fig. 3), meaning that they can bend in the ^-axis freely, without being held flat by covering fabric(s) (13,14, Fig. 3). Without the presence of a bordering layer of an overlain fabric (16, Fig. 1), as in Fig. 5 (no overlay), the material described by 7 (Fig. 7) would bend out of position with too much weight or force applied (e.g. during movement or due to gravity), except for the central position 14 which is affixed to its underlying application, creating a stabilising anchoring point. As such, the corners of the border 16, Fig. 1, are necessary to create an anchoring point at said corners, wherein the interlinked ends 18 (Fig. 7); 22 (Fig. 5, Fig. 8), themselves having the greatest degree of freedom along the perimeter (being the lightest and uncovered by a looped section) are utilised in conjunction with border 16 (Fig. 1) to create a necessary anchoring points (at corner points (I(x), I(y))} that reinforce the inserted scroll or panel (Fig. 2) and prevent unwanted ^-axis movement around the perimeter, ensuring that the panel stays interlocked and that the central areas defined by Ai are the primary areas having freedom to move along the ^-axis (e.g. when following a curved form). Furthermore, the bordering stitched or similarly affixed area (e.g. 6, Fig. 5) limits the freedom of movement of layers of material underneath it, such that as Z increases via the perimeter or circumference of the system, the stitch line or similar (6, Fig. 1, Fig. 5) ensures that a small increase in Z will correspond to a proportionately greater coefficient of friction, due to the stitch line itself preventing Z (distance from the base plane, 20, Fig. 5) from increasing along itself (no degrees of freedom i.e. space to move in the ^-axis due to affixing by stitches or similar). As such, generally, the perimeter of the system will require reduced ^-axis protrusion - relative to areas closer to the centre (e.g. around perimeter 2 (Fig. 1)) - in order to interlock the two parts, enabling the user to simply place a panel, via its already protruding looped sections 9,13 (Fig. 4, Fig. 2) into a corresponding receiving system (Fig. 5), and for the inserted panel to interlock with said system provided that a layer of material is present above it 16 (Fig. 1) and a suitably tight bordering affixing is present, such as a stitch around the perimeter or circumference 6 (Fig. 1, Fig. 5) and said layer above is wholly covering the panel it overlays (e.g. 1, Fig. 1). This describes the ^-axis interlocking of inserted elements (as Fig. 2 in Fig. 1). Whilst the depicted embodiment and area refers to a quadrilateral surface, the system can be modified to accommodate for alternate shapes and arrangements, including circles and / or functions of circles or curves. A core method would be to simply modify the border 16 (Fig. 1), such that the area it leaves remaining is of the desired shape, such that any silhouette can be achieved by limiting what the viewer can see. This would be limited by the fact that an excessive amount of bordering material may be required for more complex shapes. Alternatively, as aforementioned, the linear arrangement described by Fig. 3 can be modified to feature components travelling around the (x, y) planes, such that a circle could be comprised of circular looped areas, by overlapping two layers of fabric, stitching about their edges along the desired curve, and cutting the excess fabric (i.e. a looped component (as Fig. 6) will not naturally bend around the x,y plane unless specialised materials or fabrics are used, but it can be pre-stitched and cut about a curve). This approach may be necessary if applying the system (Fig. 1) to a continuously curving object, such as a ball (sphere), as a linear arrangement (Fig. 3) would not naturally follow curvature in x,y and z planes simultaneously - this may additionally benefit from modifications to materials, such that a more flexible material is used for three-dimensional objects such as balls, wherein a reciprocal border is selected having sufficient friction to normalise movement about the edges. With reference to flowing and / or morphing applications (as worn fabrics), by letting a new set, Ao(x,7, z), represent the base layer 20 (Fig. 5) from which components are applied - with said set described as Ai for a novel surfaces - given that ^-values would change (relative to the base of the system) to follow the movement and / or form to which they are applied, it may be understood that the rate of change to elements of area Ai should be greater than or equal to that of Ao, meaning that as Ao moves, Ai should, at minimum, be capable of moving at the same rate - to maintain homogenous form (as in a preferred embodiment). Hence, for flowing (moving) applications: &Ai(x,y z) AAofXjy z) or more specifically, dzAi(x,y z) dzAo(x,y z) In words, the rate of change of ^-coordinates or form-fitting properties about the non-flat surface of an underlain structure (response to motion or changes in form) in the overlain material should be greater than or equal to the rate of change in the base material. Particular emphasis is placed upon ^-coordinates, as the remaining values can be held constant by anchoring materials about the x, y perimeter or circumference, with only z changing, for example via the stretching of a flexible fabric such as an elastane fabric blend (e.g. 95% cotton, 5% elastane). With reference to fabric choices, this means that a heavyweight, less formfitting material such as 300gsm canvas / leather may be paired with a more form-fitting material, such as a 180gsm canvas / cotton fabric, given that the base (20, Fig. 5) is the less form-fitting of the two. This is primarily for aesthetic purposes, but extends to material elasticity, such that a more form-fitting fabric as spandex would not, in a standardised application of the system, be paired with a less flexible material, as metal, above it as the outermost material would limit the ability of its underlain application or material to re-form or change (particularly about the ^-axis), thereby applying unnecessary pressure to the joints or anchoring points (Fig. 3; Fig. 8) of the system with the potential to cause the affixing or anchoring of the system to fail, particularly when inserted component 7 (Fig. 3) is not flexible enough to follow changes in its overlain material(s). Finally, alternatively, a series of linear arrangements (Fig. 3) angled at connecting chords in a circle, or connecting straight lines around a polygonal shape mapping onto the object to which the system is applied may be used, such that, for example, an octagon may be used to approximate the linear arrangement of connecting components (Fig. 3) around a circle, provided that the border remains above the system. Hence, a plurality of borders can be used to modify the visible area to a user, such that borders can be made modular themselves to accommodate for differing silhouettes to be revealed; and a plurality of arrangements of connecting components can be utilised to affix an inserted component (Fig. 2) to the system. This may enable users to create their own arrangements of components and systems such that an indefinite arrangement and quantity of connecting components can be arranged about a system in order to affix it to a plurality of objects, shapes, materials and areas. Finally, a user may construct a matrix, as demonstrated, to determine the locations and protrusion of connecting components, such that inserts interlink, and looped areas match reciprocally around the system until it is completed, with a final plurality of inserts holding it all together. This can also be applied to three-dimensional objects by constructing a net or otherwise flattened form of them and applying similar methodology, factoring in ^-axis differentiation. Hence, to summarise, manufacturers, retailers and users alike can engage with the system in general accordance with the following methodology: 1. Select object or surface to customise using interchangeable decorative panel (12, Fig. 1, Fig. 5); 2. If using pre-made panel: a. Select compatible base-unit (panel) (Fig. 5); 3. If not using a pre-made panel: a. Define the area to be utilised (i.e. inverse of background 12 for Fig. 1); b. Construct panel system (of a plurality of options) using suitable methodology, for example via determination of a matrix to represent the system (aforementioned); cutting relevant materials using plotter, laser or scissors; and applying a suitable overlain border 16 (Fig. 1) where appropriate; 4. Select from a plurality of inserts, compatible with interconnecting components (Fig. 3) of the system, factoring in necessary forces where appropriate; 5. Optionally, affix a suitable connector (Fig. 2) for the inserted component reciprocal to the base (receiving) system (Fig. 5) via the affixed connectors to said receiving system (i.e. 14, 21, Fig. 5; 21, Fig. 3), for example via orthogonal force vector to said receiving system's affixed connector(s); 6. Affix the reciprocal panels / sub-systems (i.e. Fig. 2 and Fig. 5 to create Fig. 1), by utilising coplanar force vectors to slide an inserted material or component about coaxial reciprocal receiving components (Fig. 3), and multiplanar forces at vertices, direction changes or similar changes to the border (e.g. at 22 (Fig. 8, Fig. 5)). If stage 5 is not completed, interconnect said inserted material to its receiving component to stabilise its position (21, Fig. 3, Fig. 5); 7. To extend usage, lifespan or similar, modify components including, but not limited to: the bordering area (16, Fig. 1), inserted component(s) (Fig. 7), loops or receiving interconnecting parts (e.g. Fig. 6; 13, 14 (Fig. 3)), insert materials (to modify forces via friction (rougher materials) and pressure (thicker materials); 8. At end of lifespan, (optional) removal of panel from applied surface, by reversing method by which panel is affixed to its surface or application (e.g. heat and force). Hence, a plurality of shapes, objects and materials can be designed and customised via a repeatable, straightforward process, even without centralised control (e.g. standardisation across distributors), due to significantly greater tolerances being enabled by the design. Users can construct their own inserted designs (scrolls) as follows: 1. Given pre-made components, as defined by Fig. 4, Fig. 2: a. (Inter)layer materials having suitable components to be available about the perimeter or circumference of the system (e.g. 13, Fig. 4) b. Print a desired design to a suitable fabric or surface (for example via printable cotton and inkjet printer; polyester, sublimation printer and heat; direct-to-garment printer and standard, e.g. 340gsm, cotton; UV printer and any suitable flexible / non-flexible material); or 3d-printer; 2. In the absence of pre-made components: a. Cut a fabric into suitably sized strips, overlapping it on itself and sewing at the edges such that a margin remains into which an inserted component (7, Fig. 7) can fit (aforementioned); or utilise a non-flowing solid having mechanisms and / or openings at the same points, e.g. 3d-printed loops; 3. Cut said printed design (fabric) or 3d object to fit above the fastening components below (e.g. 1, Fig. 2 on Fig. 4), such that, for example, an A4 sheet would generally be reduced to a (reduced) sub-section of itself- primarily due to printing margins; 4. Use suitable methodology to affix said components to one another, for example via contact adhesive (glue) or an adhesive fabric, heat and pressure (via an iron) to create the inserted panel, scroll or component described by Fig. 2; 5. Interconnect said interchanging panel to any compatible reciprocal connector, interchanging interconnected components as desired. This may be further extended to append functional components, such as gadgets (e.g. toys of utility) in place of printed components. Hence, lending further description to the aforementioned background, users can construct their own fashion using non-standardised (e.g. bespoke) or standardised systems (via the described modular system of interchangeable decorative panels) with materials limited to: scissors, fabric, looped fabric, a printer and an iron (assuming the fabrics are acquired pre-made; or adding a sewing machine if not). This would give users, creators and brands the power and a novel methodology to generate their own fashion (using tools including generative artificial intelligence) into cross-functional, pluralistic systems, incorporating nascent technologies such as artificial intelligence for image generation, without leaking, sharing or exposing their intellectual property (artwork(s), methods or similar). Furthermore, by differentiating between aspects of the system(s), users may purchase or own one base system (i.e. Fig. 5 attached to a suitable application including, but not limited to: clothing, shoes, furniture or robotics) and independently create a plurality of inserted components (i.e. Fig. 2) using standard household machinery and / or equipment, lending description to the aforementioned claim of users being capable of constructing their own reciprocal components of the system. Extension of the system to boundless pluralities, sub-systems and / or embodiments is given by the utilisation of real numbers. Given that space Ai can be broken into an unboundedly many parts (x,_y, where x andjy are within the set of real numbers), corresponding components about the perimeter and adjacent to the space Ai (i.e. components described by Fig. 3, Fig. 6, Fig. 7) could map to unboundedly many sub-sets of the space. To explain this, whilst Az has 9 elements, a new set, .1,-, can have n elements, extended without an upper bound provided x and jy are real numbers and thereby map to unboundedly large surface area. Hence, by mapping a component to a subset of the set of discrete areas in Ai, unbounded pluralities of corresponding components can be incorporated to a system, justifying unboundedly many interlocking components, and finally unboundedly many interlinking inserts. With unboundedly many interlocking and / or interlinking parts, unboundedly many forms of said parts (i.e. embodiments, e.g. of fig. 7) can be interconnected - assuming cross-compatibility via uniform connection methodology (i.e. loops (9, Fig. 3) or a trinity of components interconnected using x,y, z axis force vectors) - meaning a plurality of interconnecting parts can be utilised, reused or recycled, applying to all sub-systems and components of the system, as well as to the system itself, by recursively connecting the system to another (selfreferenced) copy of itself, such that an unboundedly large number of systems (given that natural numbers extend to infinity), with an unbounded plurality of unboundedly interchanging interconnecting parts (given that real numbers extend to infinity and that sets of real numbers can correspond with sets of natural numbers) can be generated over an unbounded space, assuming sufficient materials are present. This would be achieved by converting the matrix (Fig. 4) to its reciprocal (moving looped components to reciprocal areas to create a cross, then attaching the new copy's matrix behind Fig. 1, with the new matrix (derived from Fig. 4) attached to a new, identical but separate copy of Fig. 1, such that the new systems are defined recursively (i.e. only using the parts of the whole), and can be interconnected as normal (about any axes), with the process repeated with no upper bound. Using a more limited definition, an alternative methodology by which this may be described is via connection of Fig. 4 to itself at multiple discrete points (i.e. a ... i of a larger system), forming an interlinked, interconnecting system of matrices inside of the whole (i.e. Fig. 1; Fig. 5). Given that A2 corresponds with a continuous set / area (J / ), an unbounded number of locations within the whole can be defined, by making Fig. 4 smaller and smaller. Provided that an insert would fit into the loops of Fig. 4, this would similarly interconnect. Finally, an alternate methodology may extend the system via the ^-axis, by modifying the looped components (e.g. Fig. 6) to bend into the z-axis, such that an insert (Fig. 7) could be affixed to the now three-dimensional system incorporating x,y, z motion vectors as opposed to (x and 7) or (x ory)) as generally described in the aforementioned. This would be of importance, for example, when incorporating the system (Fig. 1) to a three-dimensional form such as a shoe. Furthermore, each described adaptation is cross-functional, such that said x,y, z vectors may further be applied to an x,y (or x,y, z i.e. three-dimensional) system, such that multiple two or three-dimensional motion vectors can stack over three-dimensional space, interlocking and / or sliding about an arrangement of interlinked and / or affixed parts (eg. Fig. 3, Fig. 7, Fig. 6) over (a system of) base surface(s). In other words, interlocking, interlinked systems can be arranged multiaxially, having a system of interconnected attachments (e.g. Fig. 2) moving about a matrix / arrangement of interconnecting parts (e.g. Fig. 6, Fig. 7) over multiaxial motion vectors (x, y. z planes). This can be facilitated by the use of curved edges and / or vertices over the three-dimensional system (e.g. smooth corners over a cube), such that motion vectors do not automatically reach terminal points at said corners. This can be facilitated by interchanging component 13 (Fig. 2, Fig. 4) for the component described by Fig. 7, such that the receiving system features continuous loops into which sliding panels (as Fig. 2) can travel about three-dimensional motion vectors, or by removing loops from the receiving system, to form a sub-system, such that inserted components (Fig. 2) may continually slide about an extended Fig. 7 (where motion is not intrinsically inhibited by interlocking component 24, 21 (Fig. 7, Fig. 5), by stitching directly from point 21 (Fig. 7) to the application and moving it to an end of Fig. 7), reaching terminal points where non-compatible motion vectors are reached (e.g. by stopping when reaching point 18 (Fig. 7) by placing a loop material or fabric underneath the gap between the two parallel components at 18 (Fig. 7)) -functioning as a railway over a three-dimensional plane or about a three-dimensional object. Finally, in an alternate embodiment, to facilitate the use of installation tools in construction of the final system (Fig. 1), a manufacturer may leave openings in the stitched area about the perimeter (6, Fig. 1) at vertices or turning points (e.g. space 5, Fig. 4), such that tool can be inserted underneath 16 (Fig. 1). A diagonal stitch or similar method of affixing (e.g. rivet) at each corner can be incorporated in order to prevent corners from flapping out of position. Hence, by this described System and Method for Affixing Interchangeable Decorative Panels, a user could create a cross-functional, pluralistic system of interchangeable decorative panels, applicable to surfaces pertaining to applications including, but not limited to: toys, fashion, hardware, furniture, robotics cosmetics and itself (as aforementioned).

Claims

1. On a surface, a system of interconnecting, interlinked or interlocked parts capable of construction by a user and arranged about the surface or a subset of the surface, being comprised of:• Not less than two reciprocal layers of material, each being independent or part of the surface material, over the same plane or not less than two planes, with at least one layer comprising the female, surface layer, and not less than one layer comprising an interlocked or otherwise inserted male layer(s) to be connected with the female;• At least one recursively applied, sequential arrangement(s) of reciprocally arranged materials about the perimeter or edges or circumference or surfaces of the interlocked layers by which each layer rests beside, or interlocks with, a reciprocal arrangement of materials about the perimeter or edges or circumference or surfaces of the layers, and wherein one or more material(s) rest under or above or interlinks or interlocks with the base surface or the interlocked layers or another recursively applied material about the perimeter;• One or more inserted elements to fit within or about the reciprocal arrangements of materials about the perimeters of the layers of materials, extending or sliding between not less than two of the reciprocal or interlocked materials, such that each reciprocally arranged material about the perimeters of each layer of material over one or more planes may be further interlinked over a shared plane or axis by this inserted element;2. The claim in claim 1, wherein each material about the perimeter or edges or circumference or surfaces of each surface has one or more openings within itself, and where recursively applied sequential arrangements of one or more (male, or male-to-male) or (female, or female-to-female) elements each comprise a location about the perimeter or surface of each respective layer, having recesses between them for their corresponding element to interlock about the applied surface(s);3. A method with reference to the claim in claim 2, wherein spaces within the materials receive one or more tertiary component(s) (from Claim 1), pushed or placed by a vector of force over one or more dimensions (x or y or (x and y) or (x and y and z)) into each reciprocal element about the perimeter of each reciprocal layer, such that the materials can bend and interconnect over three dimensions;4. The claims above, wherein each material about the perimeter or edges or circumference or surfaces is a looped fabric or material, affixed to itself about not less than two overlaid sides or layers by means of stitch, adhesive or one or more solid fixtures travelling between all surfaces at least once, such that not less than one opening is formed betweenthe affixed side and its corresponding curved (looped) edge and not less than one opening is formed orthogonal to the opening or curve between the affixed sides;5. The claims above, wherein each element inserted to the materials about the perimeter or edges or circumference or surfaces is of width not more than the maximum diameter formed by each respective opening into which it is placed, and is of height not more than the maximum height of the opening at its maximum diameter configuration, such that the inserted component fits wholly within the openings of the reciprocal components into which it is connected;6. The claim in claim 1 and claim 4, wherein not less than one bordering material or component is layered above the claimed components, into which the elements beneath the bordering material or component may interlock about the z-axis such that at least one component beneath the bordering component or material interacts with the bordering component or material whilst the system is utilised;7. The claims in claim 1 and claim 4, wherein the element inserted into the interlocked or reciprocal materials about the perimeter or edges or circumference or surfaces of the layers is a continuous material or fabric comprising:• A continuous length of material to be inserted into not less than one opening of not less than two materials, interlinking each recursively applied material to one another, and where it is primarily structurally reinforced by the one layer of the system, with further lengths extending further about the openings through not less than one of the opening(s) into which the material was inserted;• An element or point of fixture at not less than one point of the inserted element that extends outside of the opening or openings into which it is inserted;• A method of fixture between each inserted element, such that each element, after being inserted to its applied material, may be interconnected to a further element or knotted, such that it no longer fits back into the space or diameter of the inserted material without undoing said fixture or knot;8. The claims in claim 1 and claim 7 wherein inserted elements may feature additional interlinking sections, such that inserted elements may optionally be reinforced by interlinking the element to one or more components appended to the base surface of the whole system or a layer of the system, or the looped elements of claim 7, by means of fixture or openings on or into the surface to which they are interlinked;9. The claims in claim 6 and claim 7 wherein inserted elements are interlinked, then placed underneath the bordering component(s) or material to create anchoring point(s) preventing the inserted component or components from extending beyond the maximum z-axis depth allowed underneath the bordering component(s) or material, or whereininserted elements are not interlinked, such that they rest below bordering component independently;10. The claims in claim 6 or claim 9 wherein the bordering component continues about the perimeter or circumference of the system and has an internal border radius causing a curve about the edges and where the inserted elements may specifically rest under the border radius (as in claim 9); or where a tertiary component is appended about the vertices of the bordering element for the purpose of reinforcing the anchoring position of inserted components of claim 9;11. In surfaces or fabrics or garments, the claims of claim 1; or claim 1 with claim 6; or claim 1 with claim 9, where a bordering component is placed above any inserted layer of material, the system of claim 1 wherein the bordering component is part of the base material (not a tertiary component), such that the components of the system are installed underneath the base system, rather than the bordering component being placed above;12. The claims above, wherein the system can be comprised of a singular, complete unit, such that the system can be applied to, or removed from surfaces by means of adhesive or affixing methodologies by placing objects through the system at points in which there are no moving parts, or via an extended border utilised for affixing the system to further surfaces, and where the system comprises:• A bordering component, as in claim 6• A base and interlocked or connected layer component, as in claim 1; and• Methods for the connection or interchanging of the layers, with reference to all prior claims;13. The claims above, wherein the border of the system is modified to create desired silhouettes or openings underneath it, limiting the aesthetic available to the user, and for allowing for specified shapes or objects to be shown;14. The claims above, with particular reference to claim 9, wherein all components of the system can bend or morph or form about the x, y and z axes, such that shapes with continuous curves, turns of narrow degree, or of otherwise static or dynamic three-dimensional planes may receive the system and interchange inserted components about any compatible plane;15. The claim in claim 1 or the claims above above, wherein components of the system can be recycled or substituted with no upper bound to the limit of cycles;16. The claims above wherein all components of the system can be formed along a singular plane, with the singular-plane comprising a net, then being convertible to a user-customisable, three-dimensional object by means of the methodology of the claims prior;17. The claims above wherein systems can be interlinked across any plane (x, y or z) to form compound, three-dimensional objects or repeatedly stacking objects in two-dimensional planes, with the compound objects extending unboundedly through the remaining axis; or wherein tertiary three-dimensional objects can be interlinked or affixed to layers of the system, such that users of the system and method may append three-dimensional objects to flat or curved or non-uniform or static or moving surfaces;18. The claims above wherein heterogeneous materials may comprise the whole, by means of the respective components of each system being interchanged to modify factors to include weights and / or thicknesses and / or tension and / or materials and / or friction and / or adhesive properties;19. The claim in claim 18, wherein a mathematical model comprising:• Matrices;• Lattices;• Vectors;• Force vectors;• General forces;• Materials;• Planes; and / or• SurfacesIs to be used to aid users in general selection of materials, or to aid users with the selection of materials in commercial settings or via printed communication(s), or to compute the behaviour of the system under varying circumstances;20. The inserted, interlocked, reciprocal layers of claim 1, wherein layers are customised by users or constructed by users or customised and constructed by users by means of standard materials or methods preferential to media or the arts;21. The claims in claim 20 and claim 9 where a method for constructing layers comprises:• A general user or commercial user printing not less than one design of aesthetic value to suitable substrate, or via suitable substrate in the case of 3d-printing;• The printed layer(s) being affixed to a matrix or lattice arrangement of material featuring the materials or loops about the perimeter or edges or circumference or surfaces (as in claims 1 or claim 9), by means of contact adhesive, heat, pressure, stitch or other affixing methodology;• The affixed sub-system having a printed or customised aesthetic upon a substrate connected to an underlying material to be substituted into claim 1 as an interconnected or affixed to a reciprocal layer;22. In commercial settings, a method pertaining to claim 21 wherein users customise the aesthetic to be printed by means of generative artificial intelligence, such that, prior to printing, in commercial settings, a user generates an image by means of suitable technology prior to it being constructed on-site, such that a user orders an image and the method of claim 21 is employed by the enterprise to construct the component to be substituted into not less than one of the layered components of claim 1;23. In commercial settings, the claim of claim 21 and / or claim 15 and / or claim 9 and / or claim 12 and / or claim 1 where an arrangement of components is to be sold to consumers comprising part, or the whole, of the system or sub-systems, to enable users to construct the necessary parts of the system by means of adhesive backed fabrics having looped components formed about their perimeters, circumferences, edges or surfaces to be interlined and / or affixed with an overlain, user-customised printed fabric, substance or similar- or the system as in claim 12;24. In toys, the system as claimed above, wherein parts are designed or intended to continually slide, such that anchoring points are replaced with continuous surfaces, interconnections or the like and surfaces or the like are to be added in a playful manner;25. The claim in claim 24 or claim 17, wherein toys, gadgets or similar can be appended to the system, such that tertiary components appended have independent functional utility, with each respectively being affixed by means of methods as in claim 12 or claim 21 (or any claim above).IntellectualPropertyOfficeApplication GB2505688.8Search report under Section 17 of the Patents Act 1977Date search completed: 15 October 2025Claims searched: 1-25International classificationSubclass and subgroup Valid from A41D27 / 04 01 / 01 / 2006 A41D27 / 08 01 / 01 / 2006Field of searchWorldwide search of patent documents classified in the following areas of the IPC:A41D, A63HDatabases used in the preparation of this search report:SEARCH-PATENTDocuments considered to be relevantPatent literatureCategory Relevant claims Document of relevance X 1-23 CN 214431872 U CAO, See figure 5 and paragraph 68 in particularIntellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office www.gov.uk / ipoX 1-13, 15 22, 24 &25 US 2012 / 0060442 A1 CABLES, See the figures X 1-13, 15 22, 24 &25 KR 200386779 Y1 UNKNOWN, See the figures Non-patent literature Category Relevant claims Document of relevanceCategoriesLetter or DescriptionsymbolX Document indicating lack of novelty or inventive step.Y Document indicating lack of inventive step, if combined with anotherdocument of the same category.& Member of the same patent family. A Document indicating technological background. P Document published on or after the priority date but before the fling date of the present application. E Earlier application published on or after the filing date of the present application.

Images