Method for evaluating interaction between immobilized substance directly or indirectly immobilized on substrate and target substance labeled with proximity-dependent modifying enzyme

Abstract

Conventional methods for analyzing interactions have been unsatisfactory for detecting weak interactions. The present invention was achieved by recognizing that this problem could be solved by a method for evaluating the interaction between an immobilized substance immobilized directly or indirectly on a substrate and a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme-labeled substance to be analyzed.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the interaction between an immobilized substance immobilized directly or indirectly on a substrate and an analyte labeled with a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme. This application claims priority from Japanese Application No. 2020-119556, which is incorporated herein by reference. [Background technology]

[0002] In fields such as disease research and drug discovery, analysis of interactions between biochemicals and chemicals is widely used as an extremely important approach to drug discovery research. In particular, protein-protein interactions are a general term for interactions that occur between proteins in vivo. These interactions induce structural changes in proteins and are controlled by reactions, and are well known to be involved in regulating fundamental mechanisms of life, such as signal transduction, transport, and metabolism. These interactions have an extremely diverse pattern, and are characterized by an enormous variety in the flexibility and breadth of the interaction surface, the length of contact lifetime, and the presence or absence of structural changes, depending on the protein type.

[0003] Traditionally, drug discovery approaches have focused on enzymes as the main target proteins and small molecules as regulatory substances. These small molecule-protein interactions target rigid cavities of approximately 300 to 1,000 square angstroms that are somewhat isolated from the surrounding water molecules. On the other hand, drug discovery targeting protein-protein interactions targets large contact surfaces of 1,500 to 3,000 square angstroms, involving surrounding water molecules, and various modalities have been proposed as alternatives to small molecules, such as medium-sized molecules, cyclic peptides, nucleic acids, antibodies, proteins, and cells. However, there are high technical hurdles to developing a comprehensive, high-throughput, simple, and low-cost method for evaluating such dynamic and relatively weak interactions, and it has not yet been put to practical use. For example, interaction analysis using live cells, such as the most commonly used two-hybrid and immunoprecipitation methods, has the advantage of being able to detect interactions with active substances under physiological conditions. However, because the types and amounts of nucleic acids and proteins vary depending on the cell type and cell cycle, these methods have the disadvantages of not only lacking comprehensiveness but also being limited in the techniques available for detecting interactions. Furthermore, identifying immobilized substances with detected interactions requires additional time and effort. A typical example of interaction analysis that does not use live cells is the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) method. This method detects changes in mass due to interactions on a sensor chip as changes in the angle of extinction of reflected light caused by surface plasmon resonance, and allows for highly accurate measurements. However, it is not a comprehensive, high-throughput evaluation method and is not suitable for interactions with small mass changes, so its use is limited.

[0004] There is biochip technology or bioarray technology that does not have the above drawbacks. In particular, when proteins are arranged on an array or chip, it is called protein chip technology or protein array technology. This technology arranges and immobilizes proteins on a substrate, enabling massive simultaneous parallel analysis of the interaction between proteins and target substances. It also has advantages in terms of ease of operation and cost. The cost per data point can be reduced to about 1 / 10 to 1 / 100 of conventional technology. Numerous protein array technologies have been proposed and are used as important tools for understanding biological phenomena or drug discovery and development, and are widely used to analyze interactions such as protein-antibody (Jeong JS, et al., Mol Cell Proteomics, 2012 (Non-Patent Document 1); Diehnelt CW et al., PLoS One, 2010 (Non-Patent Document 2), etc.), protein-protein (Song, G. et al., Mol cell Proteomics. 2019 (Non-Patent Document 3); Al-Mulla, F., et., Cancer Res., 2011 (Non-Patent Document 4), etc.), and nucleic acid-protein (Hu S et al., Cell, 2009 (Non-Patent Document 5); Liu, L., et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 2019 (Non-Patent Document 6), etc.).

[0005] Many of these commonly available protein arrays are prepared by immobilizing proteins or other substances on the surface of a substrate formed with a nitrocellulose membrane or hydrogel membrane, or on the surface of a substrate such as a glass slide, metal, plastic, or carbon. Because proteins are immobilized on these substrates in a dry or semi-dry state, the immobilized proteins are subject to drying, oxidation, and other factors over time, resulting in significant structural changes. As a result of this structural change, the proteins become denatured and no longer physiologically active. A protein array with an ingenious approach to preventing drying has also been reported (Patent Document 1). However, it is necessary to cover the solution containing the protein after application with something to protect it from drying, such as a cover sheet, which is not only time-consuming but also does not effectively prevent drying, making it unpractical for general use. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0006] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2005-069988 [Non-patent literature]

[0007] [Non-Patent Document 1] Jeong JS, et al., Mol Cell Proteomics, 2012(DOI:10.1074 / mcp.O111.016253) [Non-patent document 2] Diehnelt CW et al., PLoS One, 2010(Doi:10.1371 / journal.pone.0010728) [Non-patent document 3] Song, G. et al., Mol cell Proteomics. 2019(DOI10.1074 / mcp.RA118.000851) [Non-patent document 4] Al-Mulla, F., et., Cancer Res., 2011(DOI:10.1158 / 0008-5472.CAN-10-3102) [Non-Patent Document 5] Hu S et al., Cell, 2009(Doi:10.1016 / j.cell.2009.08.037.) [Non-patent document 6] Liu, L., et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 2019(Doi:10.1093 / nar / gkz032) Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0008] As the host factors that are targets for drug discovery and the modalities that bind to them become more diverse, it is becoming increasingly important to evaluate protein-protein interactions, peptide-protein interactions, nucleic acid-protein interactions, medium molecule compound-protein interactions, and small molecule compound-protein interactions. Conventional interaction analysis methods have been insufficient to detect these interactions (especially weak interactions). [Means for solving the problem]

[0009] The inventors have confirmed that a method for evaluating the interaction between an immobilized substance immobilized directly or indirectly on a substrate and an analyte labeled with a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme can solve the above-mentioned problems, and have completed the present invention. That is, the present invention is as follows.

[0010] 1. A method for evaluating the interaction between an immobilized substance directly or indirectly immobilized on a substrate and an analyte labeled with a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme, comprising the following steps: (1) adding a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme-labeled analyte to an immobilized substance immobilized directly or indirectly on a substrate in the presence of a label; (2) detecting the labeling substance; Evaluation method. 2. The evaluation method according to item 1, further comprising a step of cleaning the substrate between the step (1) and the step (2). 3. The dissociation constant of the bond of the interaction is 1 x 10 -8 3. The evaluation method according to the preceding item 1 or 2, wherein the saturation level is M or higher. 4. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 1 to 3, wherein the immobilized substance is a protein in a solution. 5. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 1 to 4, wherein the immobilized substance is a non-denatured protein. 6. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 1 to 5, wherein the proximity-dependent modifying enzyme is a modified biotinylating enzyme with reduced substrate specificity, and the labeling substance is biotin. 7. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 1 to 6, wherein the modified biotinylating enzyme is one or more of the following polypeptides: (1) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 (2) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 (3) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3 (4) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 12 (5) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 13 (6) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 14 (7) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15 (8) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 16 (9) A polypeptide in which 1 to 10 amino acids are substituted, deleted, inserted, and / or added in any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 3 and 12 to 16, and which has substantially the same biotinylation enzyme activity as a polypeptide consisting of any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 3 and 12 to 16. (10) A polypeptide having 90% or more homology with any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 1 to 3 and 12 to 16, and having substantially the same biotinylation enzyme activity as a polypeptide consisting of any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 1 to 3 and 12 to 16. 8. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 1 to 7, further comprising adding a binding recruiter. 9. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 1 to 8, wherein the immobilized substance is a membrane protein and the analyte is an antigen-binding substance. 10. A method for evaluating an analyte labeled with a protein as an immobilized substance indirectly immobilized on an array via magnetic beads and a modified biotinylation enzyme with reduced substrate specificity, comprising the steps of: (1) adding an analyte labeled with a modified biotinylating enzyme to an immobilized substance indirectly immobilized on an array via magnetic beads in the presence of biotin; (2) detecting the biotin; Evaluation method. 11. The evaluation method according to item 10 above, which comprises a step of washing the array between step (1) and step (2). 12. The dissociation constant of the bond of the interaction is 1 x 10 -8 12. The evaluation method according to item 10 or 11, wherein the saturation level is M or higher. 13. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 10 to 12, wherein the immobilized substance is a protein in a solution. 14. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 10 to 12, wherein the immobilized substance is a non-denatured protein. 15. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 10 to 14, wherein the proximity-dependent modifying enzyme is a modified biotinylating enzyme with reduced substrate specificity, and the labeling substance is biotin. 16. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 10 to 15, wherein the modified biotinylating enzyme is one or more of the following polypeptides: (1) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 (2) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 (3) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3 (4) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 12 (5) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 13 (6) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 14 (7) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15 (8) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 16 (9) A polypeptide in which 1 to 10 amino acids are substituted, deleted, inserted, and / or added in any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 3 and 13 to 16, and which has substantially the same biotinylation enzyme activity as a polypeptide consisting of any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 3 and 13 to 16. (10) A polypeptide having 90% or more homology with any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 1 to 3 and 13 to 16, and having substantially the same biotinylation enzyme activity as a polypeptide consisting of any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 1 to 3 and 13 to 16. 17. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 10 to 16, further comprising adding a binding recruiter. 18. The evaluation method according to any one of the preceding items 10 to 17, wherein the immobilized substance is a membrane protein and the analyte is an antigen-binding substance. [Effects of the Invention]

[0011] By using a method for evaluating the interaction (particularly protein-protein interaction) between an immobilized substance immobilized directly or indirectly on the substrate of the present invention and an analyte labeled with a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme, it was possible to detect interactions that could not be detected by conventional evaluation methods. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0012] [Figure 1] 1 shows an example of steps in the evaluation method of the present invention. [Figure 2] An example of the creation of a non-denaturing protein array. [Figure 3] FIG. 2 is a process diagram of the analysis method of the present embodiment. [Figure 4] The results of Example 2 are shown below. [Figure 5] The results of Example 3 are shown below. [Figure 6] Process diagram of the conventional analysis method. [Figure 7] The results of Comparative Example 1 are shown. [Figure 8] The results of Example 4 are shown below. [Figure 9] The results of Example 4 are shown below. [Figure 10] The results of Example 5 are shown below. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0013] (The present invention) The present invention relates to a method for evaluating the interaction between an immobilized substance immobilized directly or indirectly on a substrate and an analyte labeled with a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "evaluation method of the present invention"), which comprises the following steps: (1) adding a substance to be analyzed that is labeled with a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme to an immobilized substance that has been directly or indirectly immobilized on a substrate in the presence of a labeling substance; (2) detecting the labeling substance The evaluation of the interaction between the immobilized substance and the analyte substance includes detecting or quantifying the transient or persistent binding between the immobilized substance and the analyte substance. Preferably, the method includes a step of cleaning the substrate between the steps (1) and (2).

[0014] (substrate) The substrate may be a known substrate for detecting binding between an immobilized substance and a target substance. The substrate may be flat or in the shape of a so-called ELISA plate. Alternatively, the substrate may have microdimple-shaped depressions formed on the flat surface, or a porous membrane or nitrocellulose membrane formed on the surface. It is also possible to form pads for loading proteins. Methods for such processing may include molding, lithography, and the like, and may be selected appropriately depending on the substrate material. It is desirable to use a substrate material with low background so as not to affect the luminescence or fluorescence detection used in the subsequent interaction detection. Suitable substrate materials include, for example, non-fluorescent glass, amorphous carbon, quartz, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polymethyl methacrylate, polyolefin, polyethylene terephthalate, and cycloolefin copolymer.

[0015] (array) The array of the present invention is an array of immobilized substances directly or indirectly immobilized on a substrate (preferably on a substrate on which positioning information is specified).The array allows simultaneous evaluation of the interaction of the analyte substance with all of the immobilized substances arranged on the array.

[0016] (immobilized substance) The immobilization substance is not particularly limited as long as it can be directly or indirectly immobilized on a substrate, and examples thereof include proteins, antibodies, nucleic acids (including DNA, RNA, etc.), peptides, low molecular weight compounds, medium molecular weight compounds, cell extracts, tissue extracts, sugars, lipids, physiologically active substances, and complexes thereof. The immobilization substance may be a single molecule or a mixture, a natural product, a genetically recombinant product, or a chemically synthesized product, or a derivative or fragment. The substance may be modified, substituted, deleted, or added.

[0017] (Substance to be analyzed) The analyte is not particularly limited as long as it can be directly or indirectly labeled by a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme, and examples include proteins, antibodies, nucleic acids (including DNA, RNA, etc.), peptides, low-molecular-weight compounds, medium-molecular-weight compounds, cell extracts, tissue extracts, sugars, lipids, physiologically active substances, and complexes thereof. Specific examples of analyte complexes include those in which protein A and compound B form a complex, enabling interaction with immobilized substance C or improving the strength of the interaction. Analyte molecules may be single molecules or mixtures, natural products, recombinant products, or chemically synthesized products, or may be derivatives or fragments. Modifications, substitutions, deletions, and additions may also be performed.

[0018] (Immobilization of immobilized substances directly or indirectly onto a substrate) The immobilization of the immobilization substance to the substrate directly or indirectly can be performed using a known immobilization method, as long as the immobilization substance is not substantially washed away in the substrate washing step (B(Bound) / F(Free) separation washing step) of the evaluation method of the present invention. For example, the immobilization substance must be physically or chemically bound by an appropriate method depending on the material of the substrate. Note that "indirectly immobilizing" the immobilization substance to the substrate means immobilizing the immobilization substance to the substrate via some kind of substance (e.g., beads). Note that "immobilized" means physically or chemically bound to the substrate. When the substance to be immobilized is a tagged fusion protein fused with a tag, a ligand that specifically binds to the tag, an antibody that recognizes the tag, a metal chelate that binds to the tag, or the like may be formed on the surface of the substrate. By using the surface substrate and the tagged fusion protein, the substance to be immobilized can be directly or indirectly immobilized on the substrate by tag-ligand binding, tag-antibody binding, or tag-chelate binding. More specifically, His tag and Ni-NTA, GST tag and glutathione, MBP tag and dextrin, biotin and avidin, biotin and streptavidin, biotin and neutravidin, FLAG TM Tag and anti-FLAG TM Examples include a combination of an antibody, a GST tag and an anti-GST antibody, and an HA tag and an anti-HA antibody. When using an inorganic substrate such as glass and using a non-tag-fused protein as the immobilization substance, it is preferable to treat the substrate surface with a silane coupling agent having a functional group capable of binding to an amino or carboxyl group (e.g., epoxy group, active ester, amino group, acid anhydride group, isocyanate group, etc.). A solution containing the immobilization substance (e.g., protein) can be spotted onto the treated substrate, and the substance can be immobilized on the substrate surface by covalent bonding at the N-terminus or C-terminus of the protein. Silane coupling agents with various chain lengths are commercially available, and any can be used as long as they do not affect the protein structure. It is also possible to adjust the bond distance between the immobilization substance (e.g., protein) and the substrate using a linker. Other examples include an aminooxy linker having a hydrophobic alkyl and a thiol group, and a hydrazide linker, which are suitable for immobilizing proteins on metal surfaces.

[0019] As a specific example, magnetic beads are used. For example, a GST-fused immobilization substance (GST fusion protein) is added to magnetic beads with a glutathione surface layer formed thereon, and the immobilization substance is bound to the magnetic beads via GST. Magnetic beads bearing a GST-fused immobilization substance (GST fusion protein) on their surface can also be placed on a well-shaped substrate (particularly an array), and the GST-fused immobilization substance can be immobilized at a predetermined position on the substrate using magnetic force from the backside of the substrate. In this method, various combinations of binding modes, not limited to GST, are known to those skilled in the art, and various options are available depending on the required affinity design. In addition, some tags fused to immobilized substances (e.g., proteins) have the effect of improving the properties of proteins. For example, GST, FLAG TM These and the like have the effect of promoting hydration of the immobilization substance (e.g., protein) and can be used by appropriately fusing them with the immobilization substance (e.g., protein). Furthermore, when the immobilization substance is a membrane protein, the protein can be fused with liposomes or nanodiscs and then bound to the substrate using the aforementioned binding system. Additionally, when the immobilization substance is a protein, for the purpose of evaluating interactions more accurately, the protein can be contacted in advance with necessary enzymes to perform post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, dephosphorylation, glycosylation, ubiquitination, nitrosylation, methylation, acetylation, or lipidation. Precursors or mature forms can be prepared with or without processing, or complexes can be formed by co-expression, or isomerases, flavin enzymes, microsomes, or the like can be added to form disulfide bonds. In addition, in the process of arraying proteins, which are immobilized substances, on a substrate, general-purpose equipment can be used, such as a large-scale dispenser, an inkjet spotter, or a pin-spot type spotter, which can precisely dispense and apply even extremely small amounts of solution to the required volume at specified locations.

[0020] (Protein as immobilized material) Proteins immobilized on a substrate or immobilized or mounted on an array as immobilization substances are known to be greatly affected by the physical and chemical macro- and micro-environments, leading to denaturation. In particular, at liquid / solid and liquid / gas interfaces, such denaturation easily and irreversibly progresses, resulting in proteins that lose their inherent functionality and tend to become inactive. In conventional methods, this inactive state makes it difficult to evaluate the interaction between proteins as immobilization substances and proteins as target proteins. In other words, it is preferable for proteins as immobilization substances to be maintained in a non-denatured state. It has also been shown that proteins immobilized at designated positions on an array need only partially retain their ability to interact with the target substance. While this depends on the type of protein, as previously described in literature on protein-protein interactions (e.g., Song, G. et al., Mol cellProteomics. 2019; Al-Mulla, F., et al., Cancer Res., 2011) and nucleic acid-protein interactions (e.g., Hu S et al., Cell, 2009; Liu, L., et al., Nucleic Res., 2019), a protein array can be essentially non-denatured if some functionality remains. In other words, for molecular species such as kinases, as long as the kinase substrate protein retains some structural integrity, intermolecular interactions can be evaluated even if the protein as a whole does not retain its native structural integrity. Therefore, the non-denatured state of a protein immobilized on the array means that at least the site that interacts with the target substance maintains its shape or function. The present inventors have succeeded in commercializing the world's first non-denaturing protein array, which enables the evaluation of difficult protein-protein interactions (Morishita, R., et al., Sci Rep:doi.org / 10.1038 / s41598-019-55785-5). This non-denaturing protein array is characterized by the fact that the proteins are present in solution throughout all processes, from protein synthesis to immobilization on a substrate (arraying), storage of the protein-immobilized substrate or array, and interaction evaluation. Therefore, the immobilized proteins do not dry out or oxidize, and remain in a non-denatured state. However, during storage of the protein array, the solution may be temporarily frozen as long as this does not impair its functionality in protein interaction analysis. More specifically, in all steps of synthesis, purification, and loading of the protein (immobilization substance), as well as interaction evaluation, the protein is present in a solution such as an appropriate buffer to prevent it from drying out. For example, as illustrated in the Examples, a series of steps in which a protein fused with a tag is bound to magnetic beads having a surface composition that binds to the tag, the protein-bead complex is stored in wells formed on an array without being exposed to air, and protein-protein interactions are evaluated in solution is one desirable embodiment of the evaluation method of the present invention. Alternatively, an intermediate substance that binds to the protein to be immobilized may be applied to the substrate in advance. A buffer solution containing the protein may then be added to the coated substrate, and the interaction may be evaluated before the solution dries. Although a protein solution spot size (volume) of approximately 10 nanoliters compared to 1 microliter contributes to higher array density, it is known that the surface area relative to the volume increases by approximately 460%, resulting in increased protein inactivation and necessitating measures to prevent drying. In the case of such flat-plate arrays, maintaining the array at a humidity close to 100% minimizes drying of the protein solution and maintains the protein solution in an undenatured state for a certain period of time to prevent drying. For example, such a humidified state can be achieved using a saturated water vapor pressure humidity generator using the bubbling method or the Nafion method. Furthermore, the protein solution spots formed on the array can be covered with mineral oils, such as liquid paraffin, which have low solubility, to prevent evaporation, thereby maintaining the protein in an undenatured state. In this case, a non-denatured protein array can be realized by gently replacing the target substance with an appropriate buffer immediately before it is allowed to react with the protein, which is the immobilized substance on the substrate (array). In another preferred embodiment, a sugar surfactant can be added to a solution containing a protein, which is the immobilization substance to be spotted on an array, to improve the drying resistance of the protein. Such sugar surfactants come in a variety of alkyl chain lengths, and preferred examples include sucrose, trehalose, and maltose. For example, approximately 0.5% to 10%, preferably 1 to 5%, of a sugar surfactant can be added to a solution containing the protein.

[0021] (Method for synthesizing proteins as target substances and immobilization substances) Proteins used as the target substance and the immobilized substance can be synthesized by known methods, but it is convenient to use commonly used recombinant proteins. For example, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Sf9 insect cells, CHO cells, human cells, yeast, Brevibacillus, filamentous fungi (A. oryzae), tobacco BY-2 cells, plant transient expression systems such as Nicotiana bethamiana, lettuce, tomato (fruit and leaves), rice, barley, Phalaenopsis orchid, and chili pepper, as well as cell-free protein synthesis systems can also be used. Suitable examples of cell-free protein synthesis systems include Escherichia coli, E. coli reconstituted systems, wheat, insects, yeast, tobacco, rabbit reticulocytes, and human cells. For the purpose of comprehensively obtaining a wide variety of proteins, wheat cell-free systems are particularly advantageous, offering an extremely high probability of synthesizing proteins in a soluble state and excellent cost advantages. According to Professor Steven Salzberg of Johns Hopkins University, the latest figure for the number of human genes is 21,306, and by using a wheat cell-free system, it is possible to synthesize almost genome-wide. While it is possible to arrange all of these genes on an array as immobilized materials, it is preferable to arrange only specific functional or organ-specific categories. Suitable examples of category arrays include protein kinase, DNA binding protein, GPCR, chaperone, channel, PPase, E3 ligase, epigenetics, transporter, TM1 (single transmembrane), RNA binding, protease, CD marker, cancer testis antigen, and organ-specific cancer protein groups. Furthermore, by selecting proteins with relatively high levels of interaction from interaction databases such as BioGRID and MINT, and then selecting groups of proteins with which frequent interactions are observed and placing them on an array, it is possible to comprehensively investigate which types of proteins are likely to interact with which proteins. When using a wheat cell-free system, cell-free protein synthesis using the WEPRO 7240 series (Cell-Free Sciences) uses reagents from which GST-like proteins have been pre-removed, allowing for simple purification with glutathione beads to obtain highly pure proteins. This is one of the most preferred methods for preparing a wide variety of purified GST-tagged fusion proteins. The substance to be immobilized may be a single protein including a fusion type, or a complex protein in which multiple types coexist. In addition, antibodies, single-chain antibodies, and nanobodies can be expected to have relatively high affinity, but the dissociation constant is 1x10 -8 Some proteins have weaker affinities, such as M or higher, and are a preferred form of analysis target of the present invention. Proteins may be synthesized by introducing labeled amino acids, or by synthesizing proteins in the presence of amino acids other than the standard 20, such as stable isotope amino acids, radioisotope amino acids, and selenomethionine, or by adding tRNA bound to labeled amino acids during synthesis. Proteins may be modified by phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, myristoylation, biotinylation, etc., in the presence of the corresponding substrates and modifying enzymes. Proteins may also be modified using reagents such as click chemistry, either during or after synthesis. The conjugation may be a homomultimer or a heteromultimer, and may be performed by using a crosslinking agent or the like. Pre-prepared heteromolecular interactors, such as protein-cofactor complexes, protein-nucleic acid complexes, protein-lipid complexes, and protein-compound complexes, can also be used during or after protein synthesis. By using them during synthesis, it is possible to form complexes while maintaining the appropriate structure. In particular, when preparing protein complexes using wheat cell-free synthesis, multiple expression templates (mRNA) can be simultaneously added to a wheat cell-free extract (WEPRO7240 series) for synthesis (simultaneous batch synthesis). Alternatively, each expression template can be added separately to a wheat cell-free extract and pre-incubated for 5 minutes to 8 hours, preferably 15 minutes to 2 hours, and even more preferably 30 minutes to 1 hour, at a reaction temperature (selectable between 4°C and 37°C). This method facilitates equivalent self-complexation by mixing the resulting templates and allowing the translation reaction to proceed. The order of mixing can be designed based on the desired protein structure. For example, a specific combination of multiple expression templates can be mixed first, incubated for a certain period, and then a pre-incubation solution containing the other expression templates is added. This method allows for the expression template-ribosome complex (polysome) to form during the translation reaction, after which the translation reaction proceeds. In other words, because the ease of polysome formation varies depending on the expression template sequence, simultaneous batch synthesis tends to result in sequence-dependent competitive polysome formation, which can lead to significant imbalances in the quantitative balance of newly synthesized proteins and significantly low complex yields. In wheat cell-free synthesis, proteins can be synthesized from a plasmid containing an SP6 or T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence, a sequence for adding a 5' translation-enhancing sequence, the desired gene sequence, or a PCR product using a transcription-translation integrated expression kit (Premium One Expression kit, manufactured by Cell-Free Sciences). To produce protein complexes, simultaneous batch synthesis can be performed using a mixture of plasmids containing multiple gene sequences. However, higher complex synthesis yields can be achieved by preincubating the proteins separately, forming polysomes, and then further translation, as described above. In addition, the use of membrane proteins as the target substance and the protein to be immobilized is also a preferred embodiment of the present invention (Example). Any membrane protein expression template (mRNA) can be used to synthesize membrane protein-reconstituted liposomes (proteoliposomes) using the ProteoLiposome Expression Kit manufactured by CellFree Sciences. The ProteoLiposome Expression Kit uses soybean-derived asolectin, a complex lipid, as the source lipid for liposomes. This is because proteoliposomes are easily formed regardless of the type of membrane protein. However, any liposomes composed of various lipids can be used depending on the type of membrane protein. Representative examples include lipids that constitute cell membranes, such as phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, cholesterol, and triacylglycerol, which can be used alone or in combination. Furthermore, by adding these lipids after modifying them, for example by biotinylation, it is possible to label proteoliposomes without modifying proteins. When synthesizing proteins that contain intramolecular or intermolecular disulfide bonds (in the case of complex proteins mentioned above), disulfide bond formation can be achieved by appropriately controlling the reducing conditions during synthesis and utilizing enzymatic oxidation processes such as protein disulfide isomerase and endoplasmic reticulum oxidase 1.

[0022] (proximity-dependent labeling enzyme) The present inventors have confirmed that "when immobilizing a protein, particularly a non-denatured protein, as an immobilization substance on a substrate or array and evaluating the interaction between the immobilized substance and a substance to be analyzed, weak interactions are lost during B / F separation, making it impossible to detect intermolecular interactions even though they actually exist." This fact was first discovered in the evaluation of protein-protein interactions using an array on which non-denatured proteins were immobilized. In particular, the dissociation constant is 1x10, which is weaker than the antibody-antigen reaction. -8Intermolecular interactions of M or greater are related to the mechanisms of various physiological phenomena that originate from intermolecular interactions, and as such are important targets for future drug discovery, we believe that it is extremely important to detect weak intermolecular interactions with high sensitivity. The proximity-dependent labeling enzyme of the present invention is an enzyme that has the ability to bind a molecule that can be detected as a marker (referred to as a "labeling substance" in the present invention) to an immobilized substance when an intermolecular interaction occurs between the substance to be analyzed and the immobilized substance on the array, and the immobilized substance is present in the vicinity of the proximity-dependent labeling enzyme bound to the substance to be analyzed. Proximity-dependent labeling enzymes can be exemplified by enzymes that have been modified to weaken their substrate specificity. Examples of such enzymes include transferases, lyases, and ligases. Known methods for weakening substrate specificity include amino acid conversion or chemical modification, such as introducing a mutation into the substrate binding site or introducing the sequence of a closely related enzyme. The bond between the labeling substance and the protein that is the immobilized substance is preferably stronger than the interaction between the substance to be analyzed and the immobilized substance, but a covalent bond is desirable in that the interaction is not lost during B / F separation. By contacting a fusion molecule (proximity-dependent labeling enzyme-labeled analyte) in which a proximity-dependent labeling enzyme is bound to an analyte with a non-denatured protein array, the labeling substance is bound by covalent or strong binding force to a protein, which is an immobilized substance on the protein array with which the proximity-dependent labeling enzyme-labeled analyte interacts. The labeling substance does not substantially fall off or detach from the immobilized substance even after the B / F separation process. Furthermore, after washing, the labeled substance bound to the immobilized substance can be detected and quantified by biochemical techniques (mass spectrometry, electrophoresis, etc.).

[0023] A preferred proximity-dependent labeling enzyme of the present invention is a proximity-dependent biotin ligase obtained by modifying a portion of the amino acid sequence of the BirA protein, a biotin ligase of Escherichia coli. The BirA protein recognizes a specific amino acid sequence as a substrate and specifically binds biotin to lysine residues within that amino acid sequence. On the other hand, proximity-dependent biotin ligase loses substrate specificity and binds biotin to lysine residues on the surface of any substance within proximity, including immobilized substances. For example, proximity-dependent biotin ligases such as BioID (SEQ ID NO: 1), TurboID (SEQ ID NO: 2), and AirID (SEQ ID NO: 3) have been reported (Choi-Rhee., et al., Protein Sci, 2004 (Doi 10.1110 / ps.04911804); Roux, K., et al., JCB, 2012 (Doi 10.1083 / jcb.201112098); Branon, T. C., et al., Nat Biotech, 2018 (Doi: 10.1038 / nbt.4201); Kido, K., et al., eLife, 2020 (Doi 10.7554 / eLife.54983)). Further, suitable examples of proximity-dependent biotin ligases include the AirID-S118G mutant (sequence number 12), AVVA-R118S mutant (sequence number 13), AVVA-R118G mutant (sequence number 14), AVVA-R118S,Q141R mutant (sequence number 15), and AVVA-R118G,Q141R mutant (sequence number 16). The present inventors have investigated various mutants of the AVVA of the E. coli biotin ligase BirA (see eLife 2020;9:e54983) and found that the R118S or R118G mutation is preferred for the present invention, and that the amino acid sequence surrounding the R118 amino acid is preferably RG(R118S or R118G)RG. RG(R118S or R118G)RGR is even more preferred. BioID has low biotin-labeling enzyme activity and requires a labeling time of 18 to 24 hours at a labeling temperature of 37°C, whereas TourboID has high activity and requires a labeling time of 10 minutes at a labeling temperature of 26°C, but this results in increased nonspecific labeling. On the other hand, AirID, AirID-S118G mutant, AVVA-R118S mutant, and AVVA-R118G mutant are the most suitable proximity-dependent biotin ligases, with a reaction temperature (labeling temperature) of 26°C, a reaction time (labeling time) of approximately 3 hours, and very little nonspecific labeling. Furthermore, the present inventors have also found that introducing the Q141R mutation into AVVA mutants (AVVA-R118S,Q141R mutant, AVVA-R118G,Q141R mutant) improves labeling activity. The modified biotinylating enzyme used in the present invention is preferably one or more of the following polypeptides: (1) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 (2) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 (3) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3 (4) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 12 (5) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 13 (6) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 14 (7) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 15 (8) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 16 (9) A polypeptide in which 1 to 10, 1 to 9, 1 to 8, 1 to 7, 1 to 6, 1 to 5, 1 to 4, 1 to 3, 1 to 2, or 1 amino acid is substituted, deleted, inserted, and / or added in any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 3 and 12 to 16, and which has substantially the same biotinylation enzyme activity as a polypeptide consisting of any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 3 and 13 to 16. (10) A polypeptide having 90% or more, 91% or more, 92% or more, 93% or more, 94% or more, 95% or more, 96% or more, 97% or more, 98% or more, or 99% or more homology with any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 3 and 12 to 16, and having substantially the same biotinylation enzyme activity as a polypeptide consisting of any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 3 and 12 to 16. Substantially equivalent biotinylating enzyme activity can be measured by known methods, such as the method used in Example 4. The activity may be higher or lower than the biotinylating enzyme activity of a polypeptide consisting of any one of the amino acid sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 1 to 3 and 12 to 16. For example, the comparative value may be 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 120%, 130%, 140%, 150%, 160%, 170%, 180%, 190%, 200%, 300%, 400%, 500%, 600%, 700%, 800%, 900%, or 1000% or higher. In addition, from the viewpoint of not changing the basic properties (physical properties, functions, physiological activity, immunological activity, etc.) of the peptide when introducing mutations into the peptide, it is easily conceivable to substitute, for example, mutually homologous amino acids (polar amino acids, nonpolar amino acids, hydrophobic amino acids, hydrophilic amino acids, positively charged amino acids, negatively charged amino acids, aromatic amino acids, etc.) with each other. The proximity-dependent labeling enzyme used in the present invention may be a recombinant or chemically synthesized product, or may be a derivative or fragment, or may be modified, substituted, deleted, or added, as long as its function is not impaired. In a preferred embodiment, a fusion protein (AirID-labeled protein) is prepared by genetic engineering based on the base sequence of the protein to be analyzed and the base sequence of the gene encoding AirID. That is, a gene linking the gene encoding the substance to be analyzed and the gene encoding AirID is cloned, and the gene is expressed in a cell-free synthesis system to prepare a fusion protein of the substance to be analyzed and AirID. Alternatively, the protein to be analyzed may be indirectly bound to the AirID via a substance that binds to the analyte (support substance for the analyte), forming an AirID-support substance for the analyte-protein structure. Alternatively, a spacer may be inserted between the AirID and the analyte.

[0024] (Evaluation method of the present invention) An example of the evaluation method of the present invention is not particularly limited as long as it includes the steps of (1) adding an analyte labeled with a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme to an immobilized substance immobilized directly or indirectly on a substrate in the presence of a labeling substance, and (2) detecting the labeling substance. A method using a non-denaturing protein array as shown in Figure 1 is exemplified below. 1) Placing and immobilizing an immobilization substance on a substrate In this description, a non-denatured protein array using a non-denatured protein as the immobilization substance is used as a representative example. To keep the immobilized proteins in a non-denatured state, the surface of the array or the inside of the wells of the array is always filled with buffer. During buffer exchange, it is preferable to slowly add and remove buffer from the protein array to prevent the proteins immobilized on the magnetic beads from migrating to adjacent wells. When adding buffer, it is especially recommended to use a syringe or similar device to inject the buffer toward the wall. During protein array reaction and washing, a shaking speed of approximately one back-and-forth per second is recommended to prevent the magnetic beads from moving. 2) The storage buffer in the protein array is removed, and the fusion protein of AirID and the analyte, diluted with the reaction buffer, is added to the protein array in the presence of the labeling substance biotin. Note that "addition" can be by any method that allows contact between the immobilized substance and the analyte. Furthermore, "in the presence of the labeling substance (biotin)" can be by any method that allows contact between the immobilized substance and the labeling substance (biotin). For example, the labeling substance may be added to the array before, simultaneously with, or after the addition of the analyte to the array. The storage buffer refers to, but is not limited to, a near-neutral buffer suitable for biological reactions, containing glycerol or the like to prevent protein aggregation or stabilize the structure. The reaction buffer refers to, but is not limited to, a near-neutral buffer suitable for biological reactions, containing a blocking agent to prevent nonspecific adsorption of the analyte to the substrate or immobilized substance, as well as the labeling substance (biotin) and activation energy source (ATP) required for the reaction. The wash buffer means, but is not limited to, a near-neutral buffer containing salts and surfactants suitable for biological reactions, in order to remove the target substance that is free in the solution or bound to the substrate or immobilized substance. In the presence of biotin (and, if necessary, ATP), all of the proteins immobilized on the array interact with the AirID fusion protein, the substance to be analyzed. When the immobilized substance and the substance to be analyzed bind, the lysine residue of the immobilized substance within close range of the AirID is labeled with biotin. If the fusion protein does not contain a lysine residue, the protein may be modified to contain a lysine residue, if necessary. 3) In conventional techniques, because a complex of interacting proteins (immobilized substances) and target substances is used for analysis, the target substances that are free in the reaction buffer or nonspecifically adsorbed to the immobilized proteins are removed by a washing procedure, which also removes target substances that interact specifically but weakly. On the other hand, the interaction evaluation method of the present invention detects biotin bound to proteins, which are immobilized substances on an array, and thus can detect interactions even if specific but weakly interacting analyte substances are removed by washing. 4) After washing, the biotin labeled protein, which is the immobilized substance immobilized on the array, is detected using a substance that specifically recognizes and binds to biotin, and the interaction analysis results are obtained as a measurement image. Substances that specifically recognize and bind to biotin and are used to detect interactions include anti-biotin antibodies and streptavidin. It is desirable for both substances to be HRP-, AP-, or fluorescently labeled. The anti-biotin antibody or streptavidin is preferably diluted in a reaction buffer and placed in the protein array for a binding reaction with biotin. After the reaction, washing is required to remove any free anti-biotin antibody or streptavidin. After washing, if an HRP / AP-labeled substance is used, a chemiluminescent reagent is added, and the luminescence obtained by the reaction of the chemiluminescent reagent with HRP / AP is measured using a luminescence detection device. An example of a luminescence detection device is the LAS (manufactured by GE). If a fluorescent label is used, measurement is performed using a fluorescence detection device. An example of a fluorescence detection device is the Typhoon (manufactured by GE). 5) From the measured images, the presence or absence of an interaction between the protein immobilized on each array and the protein to be analyzed is determined. To determine whether an interaction exists, it is desirable to digitize the signal of each spot on the measurement image and determine that an interaction exists if the signal is above a certain value. Analysis software such as Array Pro Analyzer is desirable for digitizing the measurement image. This makes it possible to simultaneously measure the strength of interaction (binding strength) between multiple immobilized substances and the substance being analyzed.

[0025] (Ability to measure bond strength in the evaluation method of the present invention) In the evaluation method of the present invention, the binding between TP53 and MDM2 can be measured as shown in the following examples. The paper "Mol Cancer Res 2003;1:1001-1008" cited literature that measured the dissociation constant between TP53 peptide and MDM2 using isothermal titration calorimetry, stopped-flow spectroscopy, and fluorescence polarization spectroscopy, and found that the dissociation constant was 6 × 10 -8 M~7×10 -7 It has been reported that M. The literature "J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:38795-38802" reported that the dissociation constant between TP53 (turn II motif) and MDM2 was 2 × 10 by SPR measurement. -5 It is reported that M. In general, the dissociation constant between TP53 and MDM2 varies depending on the conditions, but according to previous reports, it is 6 × 10 -8 M~2×10 -5 It is known that the range of M That is, in the evaluation method of the present invention, the dissociation constant is 1 × 10 -8 M or more, 1×10 -7 M or more, 1×10 -6 M or more, 1×10 -5 M or more, 1×10 -4 M or more, 1×10 -3 M or more, 1×10 -2 M or more, 1×10 -8 ~1×10 -3 M, 1 x 10 -8 M~1×10 -4 M, 1 x 10 -8 M~1×10 -5 M, 1 x 10 -7 M~1×10 -3 M, 1 x 10 -7 M~1×10 -4 M, 1 x 10 -7 M~1×10 -5 M, 1 x 10 -6 M~1×10 -3 M, 1 x 10 -6 M~1×10 -4 M, 1 x 10 -6 M~1×10 -5 M, 1 x 10 -5 M~1×10 -4 M, or 6 x 10 -8 M~2×10 -5 The binding of M can be measured.

[0026] (Combined Recruiter) The binding recruiter of the present invention is not particularly limited as long as it is a substance that induces, promotes, initiates, etc., an interaction between an immobilization substance and an analyte substance labeled with a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme, and examples thereof include proteins, antibodies, nucleic acids (including DNA, RNA, etc.), peptides, low molecular weight compounds, medium molecular weight compounds, cell extracts, tissue extracts, sugars, lipids, physiologically active substances, or complexes thereof. Specifically, examples of substances that recruit the interaction between CRBN and IKZF1 or SALL4 as described in Example 3 include thalidomide derivatives. [Example]

[0027] (Creation of non-denaturing protein arrays) In this Example 1, a non-denatured protein array was prepared, the details of which are as follows.

[0028] (Synthesis of immobilized proteins using a wheat cell-free synthesis system) In the non-denatured protein arrays used in Examples 2 and 3 of the present invention and Comparative Example 1, proteins as immobilized substances were synthesized using a wheat cell-free synthesis system. The synthesized proteins as immobilized substances were subjected to a process from immobilization on the protein array to storage in solution. The template DNA for synthesis of each immobilized substance was prepared by PCR. The template was a FLAG TM The tag protein was synthesized by fusing it with a GST protein for binding to magnetic beads with glutathione attached to their surface (glutathione magnetic beads). The PCR products synthesized for each immobilization substance were subjected to a transcription reaction followed by a translation reaction in separate containers (in separate wells of a microplate) to synthesize each immobilization substance. For the translation reaction, wheat extract from which endogenous wheat proteins that specifically bind to glutathione magnetic beads had been removed was used (References: US7838640, US7919597).

[0029] (Binding of GST proteins to magnetic beads and purification) Glutathione magnetic beads were added to a reaction solution containing wheat germ extract containing proteins after protein synthesis (post-translation), and the reaction mixture was stirred to allow the GST-mediated binding reaction of the immobilized substance to the magnetic beads (GST binding capacity 10 mg / mL). After the binding reaction, the magnetic beads were held in place using a magnet, and the unbound protein solution fraction containing the proteins derived from the wheat germ extract was removed. A washing buffer was added to the container to wash the magnetic beads with the immobilization substance bound to them, and the washing buffer was removed while the magnetic beads were held in the container using a magnet. After repeating this washing process multiple times, fresh washing buffer was added to prepare a suspension of magnetic beads.

[0030] (Immobilization of magnetic beads on an array substrate) The amount of magnetic bead suspension to be immobilized on the array substrate was aspirated using a dispenser and dispensed into the designated positions (wells) on the substrate. The substrate used consisted of a resin plate (well plate) with wells for holding the magnetic beads in the designated positions, and a magnetic plate containing a permanent magnet fitted underneath.

[0031] (Storage of array substrate after immobilizing magnetic beads) The array substrate was made of a material that would not break at low temperatures, allowing for storage of the protein array at ultra-low temperatures after production. Furthermore, to enable signal detection using fluorescent labels, the substrate was made of a material that does not have autofluorescence. The permanent magnet in the magnetic plate had a magnetic force strong enough to prevent the magnetic beads on the substrate from moving during the interaction reaction process between the immobilized substance on the array substrate and the substance to be analyzed. After dispensing and immobilizing the magnetic beads bound to the protein, which is the immobilization substance, a buffer suitable for storing the protein (a buffer containing a reagent for protecting the protein) was added to the array substrate, which was then sealed and stored at -80°C until use. Figure 2 shows the structure of the protein array and the process of immobilizing proteins, which are the immobilization substances. [Example]

[0032] (Analysis of molecular interactions between TP53 and MDM2 or between Iκβα and RelA) In this example, interaction analysis was performed between TP53 and MDM2 or between Iκβα and RelA, proteins with which they are known to bind. The flow of this example is shown in Figure 3. Details are as follows.

[0033] (Protein synthesis of the substance to be analyzed and the immobilized substance) Template DNA was synthesized by fusing TP53 (SEQ ID NO: 4) and Iκβα (SEQ ID NO: 5) with AirID (SEQ ID NO: 3) as the target substances to be analyzed. MDM2 (SEQ ID NO: 10) and RelA (SEQ ID NO: 11) were used as immobilized substances (target proteins), and 10 types of proteins (controls) were used as controls. TM Template DNA fused to the tag protein and GST protein was synthesized. Using each synthesized template DNA, a wheat cell-free expression system was used to identify the AirID fusion target substance and FLAG. TM -GST fusion immobilization material was synthesized.

[0034] (Binding of immobilized substances to magnetic beads and purification) FLAG TM The GST-fused immobilized substances (MDM2, RelA, and 10 other proteins) were bound to glutathione magnetic beads (GST binding capacity 10 mg / mL) for use in non-denaturing protein arrays and purified. The purified magnetic beads were diluted to a 10 vol% slurry in 15 nL (top row in Figure 4) or 75 nL (bottom row in Figure 4), and quantitatively dispensed and immobilized by magnetic force using a magnetic plate. This produced a non-denaturing protein array.

[0035] (Biotin labeling of immobilized material in the presence of the analyte) The AirID fusion analyte (Iκβα or TP53) diluted in reaction buffer containing biotin and ATP was added to the FLAG TM -React with GST-fused immobilized substances (MDM2 or RelA and 10 other proteins) and FLAG TM The immobilized β-GST fusion material was labeled with biotin.

[0036] (Removal of target substances) To remove the AirID-fused analyte contained in the reaction buffer or adsorbed on the magnetic beads, the reaction buffer was removed and then washed multiple times with a washing buffer.

[0037] (Biotin detection using HRP-labeled streptavidin) Remove the washing buffer, add HRP-labeled streptavidin solution diluted with reaction buffer, and label the FLAG on the magnetic beads. TM The streptavidin was reacted with the GST-fused immobilized material. To remove any free streptavidin, the reaction buffer was removed, followed by multiple washes with the wash buffer. After removing the wash buffer, a chemiluminescent reagent was added and reacted. The resulting luminescence was detected using an LAS4000 (GE) and a measurement image was obtained.

[0038] (Biotin detection results) The acquired measurement image is shown in Figure 4. Luminescence was observed between TP53 and MDM2, and between Iκβα and RelA. Luminescence was not observed between other proteins. This example confirmed that the analytical method of the present invention can analyze specific interactions between immobilized substances and target substances. [Example]

[0039] (Analysis of compound-dependent interactions between CRBN and IKZF1 or SALL4) In this example, we analyzed the interaction between CRBN (SEQ ID NO: 7) and IKZF1 (SEQ ID NO: 6) or SALL4 (SEQ ID NO: 9), proteins known to bind to each other. It is known that a thalidomide derivative (Pomalidomide) enhances these bindings. Therefore, we analyzed whether CRBN interacts with IKZF1 or SALL4 in a compound-dependent manner (as a binding recruiter) by adding a compound (Pomalidomide derivative) to the reaction buffer. The flow of this example is shown in Figure 3.

[0040] (Protein synthesis of the substance to be analyzed and the immobilized substance) As the target substance (protein), template DNA was synthesized by fusing CRBN with AirID, and template DNA was synthesized by fusing mutant CRBN (SEQ ID NO: 8) with AirID, which had a mutation in the binding site with the thalidomide derivative. As the immobilized substance (protein), IKZF1, SALL4, or Venus (control) as a comparison target were used as FLAG. TM Template DNA was synthesized by fusing the tag protein and GST protein. Each synthesized template DNA was expressed in a wheat cell-free expression system, and the AirID fusion analysis target substance and FLAG TM -GST fusion immobilization material was synthesized.

[0041] (Binding of immobilized substances to magnetic beads and purification) FLAG TM The GST-fused immobilized proteins (IKZF1, SALL4, or Venus) were bound to glutathione magnetic beads and purified. The purified magnetic beads were dispensed into wells of a plate and immobilized by magnetic force using a magnetic plate. This produced a non-denaturing protein array.

[0042] (Biotin labeling of immobilized material in the presence of the analyte) The AirID fusion target substance (CRBN or mutant CRBN) diluted in a reaction buffer containing biotin and ATP was added to the FLAG marker on the magnetic beads. TM -GST-fused immobilized material (IKZF1, SALL4 or Venus) was reacted with FLAGTM The immobilized β-GST fusion material was labeled with biotin.

[0043] (Removal of target substances) To remove the AirID-fused analyte contained in the reaction buffer or adsorbed on the magnetic beads, the reaction buffer was removed and then washed multiple times with a washing buffer.

[0044] (Biotin detection using HRP-labeled streptavidin) Remove the washing buffer, add HRP-labeled streptavidin solution diluted with reaction buffer, and label the FLAG on the magnetic beads. TM The streptavidin was reacted with the GST-fused immobilized material. To remove any free streptavidin, the reaction buffer was removed, followed by multiple washes with the wash buffer. After removing the wash buffer, a chemiluminescent reagent was added and reacted. The resulting luminescence was detected using an LAS4000 (GE) and a measurement image was obtained.

[0045] (Biotin detection results) The acquired measurement image is shown in Figure 5. The luminescence intensity of CRBN and IKZF1 or SALL4 was particularly increased when the compound was added. On the other hand, almost no increase in luminescence intensity was observed when the compound was not added or when mutant CRBN with mutations in the binding site was used. In this example, we were able to analyze the compound-dependent interaction between CRBN and IKZF1 or SALL4. That is, it was confirmed that the analytical method of the present invention can analyze not only the specific interaction between a protein as an immobilized substance and a protein as an analyte substance, but also compound-dependent interactions. [Example]

[0046] (Comparison of modified biotinylation enzymes) In this example, each modified biotinylating enzyme was evaluated by the method used in Example 2. Specifically, using a method similar to that used for AirID (sequence number 3) in Example 2, interaction analysis between TP53 and MDM2 or between Iκβα and RelA was performed using BioID (sequence number 1), TurboID (sequence number 2), AirID-S118G mutant (sequence number 12), AVVA-R118S mutant (sequence number 13), AVVA-R118G mutant (sequence number 14), AVVA-R118S,Q141R mutant (sequence number 15), and AVVA-R118G,Q141R mutant (sequence number 16).

[0047] The results of this example, including the results of Example 2, are shown in FIGS. The results shown in the figure were obtained by dispensing 75 nL of magnetic beads into the plate wells. The exposure time for luminescence detection using the LAS4000 (GE) was set to 3 minutes for TurboID and 10 minutes for proteins with other sequence numbers. Signal values ​​were measured using the Array-Pro Analyzer. (商標) was used to obtain it from the measurement image. The results in the figure show that TurboID allows labeling at room temperature in a short time, and the signal intensity is high and the contrast with negative interactions is sufficiently large, but a certain signal (non-specificity) is observed even in interactions that should be negative. A labeling time of 30 minutes allows measurements with a sufficiently high S / N value, but a labeling time of 1 hour increases the negative signal intensity and results in a low S / N value. Therefore, control of exposure time is necessary. Although BioID has little nonspecificity, its biotin modification activity is lower than that of other enzymes, and the labeling temperature is high at 37°C and the labeling time is long (24 hours), making it unsuitable for evaluating interactions between proteins that are easily denatured or decomposed. The proximity-dependent biotin ligases AirID (sequence number 3), AirID-S118G mutant (sequence number 12), AVVA-R118S mutant (sequence number 13), AVVA-R118G mutant (sequence number 14), AVVA-R118S,Q141R mutant (sequence number 15), and AVVA-R118G,Q141R mutant (sequence number 16) are preferred for use in the evaluation method of this example because they have a short leveling time of 3 hours, a relatively mild temperature, and very high specificity. [Example]

[0048] (Use of membrane proteins as immobilization materials) In this example, a membrane protein was used as the immobilization substance. The immobilized substance was the cell surface antigen gene T1R1 (Reference: Production of monoclonal antibodies against GPCR using cell-free synthesized GPCR antigen and biotinylated liposome-based interaction assay. Sci Rep. 5, 11333), which was subcloned into a wheat cell-free expression vector (pEU-E01-His-MCS-N) manufactured by Cell Free Sciences, and synthesis was carried out using the company's ProteoLiposome Kit. T1R1 is synthesized in the Wepro7240 extract, mostly embedded in the lipid bilayer of asolectin liposomes (proteo-liposomes). This T1R1 synthesis crude solution was mixed with Promega's Magnehis-ni-particles (final particle concentration: 10%) suspended in phosphate buffer containing 0.5% Tween 20 (surfactant), and the T1R1-lipid complexes were bound to the magnetic beads via the His-tag. After washing with buffer, 15 nL equivalent of magnetic beads was quantitatively dispensed onto the wells of a magnetic plate to create a non-denatured protein array. An anti-T1R1 antibody was used as the analyte. By contacting an anti-T1R1 antibody with N-ProteinA-AVVA R118S, a proximity-dependent modifying enzyme (AVVA-R118S mutant (SEQ ID NO: 13)) fused to Protein A at its N-terminus, the proximity-dependent modifying enzyme could be easily attached to the Fc region of the antibody. Using a similar method, we prepared cell surface antigen genes CXCR4, CD63, DRD1, GHSR, and PTGER1 as immobilized substances, and anti-DRD1-AVVA R118S as an analytical substance, and evaluated the specificity of each antibody on a non-denaturing protein array.

[0049] The results of this example are shown in FIG. It was confirmed that the evaluation method of this example can be used to analyze membrane proteins as immobilization substances simply, with high sensitivity and high specificity.

[0050] (Comparison with conventional methods for evaluating intermolecular interactions) Using the interaction analysis between TP53 and MDM2, and between Iκβα and RelA as models, conventional methods for evaluating molecular interactions were performed. In conventional methods for evaluating molecular interactions, the target substance (protein) is labeled with biotin, and the interaction with the immobilized substance (protein) is directly analyzed using the biotin on the target substance as an indicator. In this case, if the interaction between the target substance and the immobilized substance is weak and the target substance is removed from the immobilized substance during the washing procedure of the analysis process, it is impossible to detect the interaction (see Figure 6). In conventional methods for evaluating molecular interactions, TP53 or Iκβα biotin-labeled with BirA was used.

[0051] (Preparation of target proteins used in conventional molecular interaction analysis methods) The target substance for analysis used in the conventional intermolecular interaction analysis method was prepared by preparing a wheat cell-free expression template, fusing TP53 or Iκβα as the target substance with the BirA recognition sequence, synthesizing the protein from the synthesized template using cell-free protein synthesis, and biotin-labeling it with BirA.

[0052] (Preparation of immobilized material) The immobilized substances (proteins) used in the conventional molecular interaction analysis method were MDM2, RelA, and 10 types of control proteins as comparison targets. TM -GST protein fusion immobilization material.

[0053] (Binding of immobilized substances to magnetic beads and purification) FLAG prepared as an immobilized material TM The GST-fusion proteins (MDM2, RelA, and 10 other proteins) were bound to glutathione magnetic beads and purified. The purified magnetic beads were then dispensed into the wells of a plate and immobilized by magnetic force using a magnetic plate. This allowed the production of a non-denaturing protein array.

[0054] (Biotin labeling of immobilized material in the presence of the analyte) In conventional methods for analyzing molecular interactions, biotin-labeled fusion proteins (TP53 or Iκβα) prepared as target substances are diluted in reaction buffer and then attached to FLAG beads on magnetic beads. TM The cells were reacted with GST fusion proteins (MDM2 or RelA, and 10 other proteins).

[0055] (Removal of target substances) To remove the biotin-labeled fusion target protein that was free in the reaction buffer or adsorbed onto the magnetic beads, the reaction buffer was removed, and then the beads were washed multiple times with a washing buffer.

[0056] (Biotin detection using HRP-labeled streptavidin) Remove the washing buffer, add HRP-labeled streptavidin diluted in reaction buffer, and label the FLAG on the magnetic beads. TMThe streptavidin was reacted with the GST fusion protein. To remove free streptavidin, the reaction buffer was removed, followed by multiple washes with the wash buffer. After removing the wash buffer, a chemiluminescent reagent was added and reacted. The resulting luminescence was detected using an LAS4000 (GE) and a measurement image was obtained.

[0057] (Biotin detection results) Figure 7 shows the measurement image obtained using the conventional intermolecular interaction analysis method. In conventional analytical methods using biotin-labeled TP53 or Iκβα without AirID fusion, no increase in luminescence intensity was observed. On the other hand, in Example 2, which is the analytical method of the present invention, luminescence was observed between TP53 and MDM2, and between Iκβα and RelA. No luminescence was observed between other proteins. As a result, the interaction between TP53 and MDM2, and between Iκβα and RelA could not be detected using conventional protein array analysis methods. The reason for this is thought to be that the intermolecular interaction between the two proteins was broken during the washing process, and the biotin-labeled target substance (TP53 or Iκβα) was washed away. As described above, the intermolecular interaction analysis method of the present invention differs from conventional intermolecular interaction analysis methods in that it is capable of analyzing relatively weak intermolecular interactions. [Industrial Applicability]

[0058] The evaluation method of the present invention can detect interactions that could not be detected by conventional evaluation methods.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the interaction between a protein that is maintained in a non-denatured state by being present in a solution as an immobilization substance directly or indirectly immobilized on a substrate, and an analyte labeled with a modified biotinylation enzyme having reduced substrate specificity, the method comprising the steps of: (1) adding an analyte labeled with the modified biotinylation enzyme having reduced substrate specificity to an immobilized substance immobilized directly or indirectly on a substrate in the presence of biotin; (2) cleaning the substrate; and (3) detecting the biotin; Evaluation method.

2. The dissociation constant of the bond of the interaction is 1x10 -8 The evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the number of saturations is M or more.

3. The evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 2, wherein the modified biotinylating enzyme is one or more of the following polypeptides: (1) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 (2) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 (3) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3 (4) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

12. (5) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

13. (6) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

14. (7) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

15. (8) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

16.

4. The evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising adding a binding recruiter.

5. The evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the immobilized substance is a membrane protein and the analyte is an antigen-binding substance.

6. A method for evaluating an analyte labeled with a protein as an immobilized substance indirectly immobilized on an array via magnetic beads and a modified biotinylation enzyme with reduced substrate specificity, the method comprising the steps of: (1) adding an analyte labeled with a modified biotinylating enzyme to an immobilized substance indirectly immobilized on an array via magnetic beads in the presence of biotin; (2) washing the array; and (3) detecting the biotin; wherein the protein to be immobilized is maintained in a non-denatured state by being present in a solution; Evaluation method.

7. The dissociation constant of the interaction bond is 1x10 -8 The evaluation method according to claim 6, wherein the number of saturations is M or more.

8. The evaluation method according to any one of claims 6 to 7, wherein the modified biotinylating enzyme is one or more of the following polypeptides: (1) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 (2) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 (3) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3 (4) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

12. (5) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

13. (6) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

14. (7) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

15. (8) A polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:

16.

9. The evaluation method according to any one of claims 6 to 8, further comprising adding a binding recruiter.

10. The evaluation method according to any one of claims 6 to 9, wherein the immobilized substance is a membrane protein and the analyte is an antigen-binding substance.

11. the target substance to be analyzed is E3 ligase or a part thereof, further comprising the step of adding a binding recruiter; and The evaluation method according to claim 1 , wherein the interaction is an interaction dependent on the binding recruiter.

12. The evaluation method according to claim 11 , wherein the immobilization substance is a membrane protein fused with a liposome or a nanodisc.

Images