System for the analysis of an object passing through a gate

Abstract

The invention relates to a system for the analysis of an object passing through an open gate of a building opening with a light grid and with an evaluation device. The light grid has a plurality of individual light barriers for emitting and receiving light beams at different and defined heights and for detecting the passage of an object through the open gate. The evaluation device is designed to evaluate the interruption state of the individual light barriers and to output a signal when an individual light barrier is interrupted. The evaluation device is furthermore designed to detect and evaluate the duration of the changes in the interruption states and to generate therefrom, together with the different heights, a pattern of the object in height and length. The evaluation device furthermore has a memory in which references are stored for different kinds of objects. The evaluation device is furthermore designed to identify the kind of object by applying the reference to the pattern.

Description

[0001] System for object analysis during gate passage

[0002] The invention relates to a system for analyzing an object passing through an open gate of a building opening.

[0003] State-of-the-art systems with light grids are known that detect the presence and height of an object.

[0004] The object of the invention is to provide an improved system.

[0005] This object is achieved, starting from a system of the type mentioned above, by a system according to claim 1. Advantageous embodiments are specified in the further dependent claims.

[0006] The system according to the invention is a system for analyzing an object passing through an open gate of a building opening, comprising a light grid and an evaluation device. The light grid has a plurality of individual light barriers for emitting and receiving light beams at different and defined heights and for detecting the passage of an object through the open gate. The evaluation device is designed to evaluate the interruption state of the individual light barriers and to output a signal when an individual light barrier is interrupted. Furthermore, the evaluation device is designed to record and evaluate the duration of the changes in the interruption states and, together with the different heights, to generate a pattern of the object in height and length. Furthermore, the evaluation device has a memory in which references are stored for different types of objects.Furthermore, the evaluation device is designed to identify the type of an object by applying the reference to the pattern.

[0007] The system according to the invention can offer the advantage of being able to more clearly determine or monitor the passage of an object through a building opening. Furthermore, the system enables identification and / or monitoring without wasting time and without invasive work on the object. "Multiple" means at least two, or at least five, or at least ten, or at least 20, or at least 40. Depending on the shape of the objects, more or fewer individual light barriers can be provided for identification, since the number also determines the resolution.

[0008] The pattern can be a pixel pattern with pixel entries for the interruptions of the light beams or a table with the duration of interruptions and non-interruptions per light beam. The pixel pattern can be assigned to the corresponding light beams in height and to the time course in length.

[0009] A reference can be a collection of patterns or tables for different types of objects. A reference can be an artificial intelligence system trained with such a collection. This enables reliable recognition in significantly more differentiated situations.

[0010] Preferably, the evaluation device is designed to store references in the memory for typical sections with known horizontal length of species, and to identify the typical section of known length by applying (comparison or AI) the reference to the pattern.

[0011] This can have the advantage that the identification of individual object types can be carried out more reliably.

[0012] Preferably, the evaluation device is designed to determine a scaling factor for the length of the pattern from the length of the typical section in the pattern and its known length.

[0013] The scaling factor can specify the real length of a pixel or a specific duration of the interruption.

[0014] This can have the advantage that the technical implementation and applicability are significantly broader.

[0015] Preferably, the evaluation device is designed to determine the duration of the interruption of a beam of light through the typical section of known length and to determine and / or output the speed of the object based on the duration of the interruption and the known length. This can enable the estimation of size ratios and dimensions.

[0016] Preferably, the evaluation device is designed to select a section of the object, to determine the duration of the interruption of a light beam through a section, and to determine and / or output the speed of the object from the duration of the interruption and the length of the section in the pattern and the scaling factor.

[0017] Preferably, the evaluation device is designed to store references in the memory for sections of types which correspond to a cargo load and for typical widths of the cargo loads and to identify the section which corresponds to a cargo load by applying the reference to the pattern and to determine the length and height of the cargo load from the length and height of the cargo load in the pattern and the scaling factor and to determine and / or output the volume of the cargo load from the length, height and typical width of the cargo load.

[0018] This can provide the advantage of easily monitoring storage capacity.

[0019] Preferably, the evaluation device is designed to identify the orientation of the type of object and to determine and / or output the direction of movement of the object from the orientation.

[0020] This can provide the advantage of easily monitoring storage capacity.

[0021] The light grid preferably has at least 2, at least 5, at least 10, at least 20, or at least 40 individual light barriers. The light grid preferably has different heights for the light beams relative to the floor or the lower end of the light barrier strips. The light grid preferably has different heights for the light barriers, equally spaced from each other.

[0022] This can enable cost optimization or resolution optimization, depending on whether high resolution is desired.

[0023] Preferably, the interruption state is either an interruption or no interruption in the reception of the light beams from the individual light barriers. Preferably, the evaluation device is designed to output the signal to the door control system to stop the closing movement of the door.

[0024] This can have the advantage that the system according to the invention can be used as a typical light barrier in addition to securing a gate.

[0025] Further features of the invention are set forth in the drawings.

[0026] The advantages mentioned can also be realized for combinations of features in which they are not mentioned.

[0027] Overview of the drawings:

[0028] Embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawings and explained in more detail below. Like reference numerals in the individual figures denote corresponding elements. They show:

[0029] Fig. 1 Building opening, gate, light grid, object

[0030] Fig. 2 Pixel image of a person with a rolling table and a package

[0031] Fig. 3 Pixel image of a person with a pallet truck and transport goods

[0032] Detailed description of the drawings:

[0033] Fig. 1 shows a system according to the invention for analyzing an object 20 passing through an open gate 11 of a building opening 10 with a light grid 30. The gate 11 is a rolling gate or a sectional gate or another gate with a vertically movable gate leaf 12, which is open here. The gate 11 is located in a wall (not shown) with a building opening 10. The gate comprises a gate control 14 and a gate drive 13. The gate control is the control device 14 of the gate, which controls the gate drive and thus the movement of the gate leaf.

[0034] The light grid 30 is arranged in the plane of the door leaf 12. The light grid 30 has a transmitter strip 31 and a receiver strip 32, as well as an evaluation device (not shown here). The transmitter strip and the receiver strip are arranged in the plane of the door, to the side of the closed door leaf. The transmitter strip has transmitter elements 33, and the receiver strip has receiver elements 34, which are vertically aligned and can form horizontal light barriers with light beams 35. The light beams cover essentially the entire opening of the door.

[0035] The door leaf 12 and an object 20 are located between the transmitter and receiver strips. The object 20 interrupts some light beams 36, so that their associated receiver elements detect an interruption. Light beams 35, which here run above or in a recess of the object, are not interrupted, and the associated receiver elements detect the light beam and therefore no interruption. The evaluation device uses a known method to distinguish whether a light beam is interrupted by the door leaf or by an object. Receiver elements 37 shaded by the door leaf 12 are masked out by the evaluation device and not used for further analysis. If a light beam is interrupted by an object, the evaluation device sends a signal to the door control system, which uses this signal to prevent the door from closing or to stop and reopen a closing door.

[0036] Fig. 2 and 3 show pixel images of an object 20 passing through the open gate.

[0037] When an object is detected in the area of ​​the open gate due to the first interruption of a light beam, the evaluation device starts a scan mode for the light grid until there is no more interruption. The interruption state of all light beams is recorded as a line image, repeated at a repetition rate of 50 milliseconds, and combined into a pixel array. Uninterrupted light beams are shown in white. Interrupted light beams are shown in black. Pixels at the same height in the image correspond to the same light beam. The height of the pixels is arranged according to the increasing height of the light beams. The sequence of pixels in the horizontal direction corresponds to the chronologically successive line images.

[0038] A reference is stored in the evaluation device that can identify a specific type of object. This could include a known rolling table or a known pallet truck. The evaluation device also stores the height at which a typical section with a known length is located for each type of object. For example, the height and length of the lower level of a rolling table or the height and length of a Euro pallet on a pallet truck. The evaluation device also stores the typical depth of a typical transport item of the respective type.

[0039] The reference can be an image database of patterns or an artificial intelligence system in which a convolutional neural network is trained using several different images of the same type.

[0040] Length is the length in the direction of motion. Height is the height perpendicular to the ground.

[0041] Depth is the depth in the direction of the light rays. Figure 2 shows, as object 20, a person pushing a rolling table 21 with a package as transport item 40 through the gate. The evaluation device uses the reference to identify the rolling table 21 and the lower level of the rolling table 22, along with its height, as a typical section in the pixel image.

[0042] The length of this typical section 22 is stored in the evaluation device. The evaluation device then determines the horizontal scaling factor for a pixel of the pixel image by dividing the stored length of the typical section by the number of pixels that the typical section has in the horizontal direction in the pixel image.

[0043] The evaluation device then uses the reference to identify the transport item 40 in the pixel image, which is being transported by the roller table 21. Using the pixel extent of the transport item in the pixel image in the horizontal direction and the scaling factor, the evaluation device calculates the length of the transport item. Due to the known height of the light beams, the actual height distances of the pixels are known. Using the pixel extent of the transport item in the pixel image in the vertical direction and the known height distances of the pixels, the evaluation device determines the height of the transport item. Using the determined length and height of the transport item and the stored typical width of the transport item for this type, in this case the roller table, the evaluation device determines the volume of the transport item.

[0044] The evaluation device determines the travel time of this typical section based on the number of pixels of the typical section in the horizontal direction in the pixel image, here the lower level 22 of the roller table, multiplied by the duration of the pixel clock. From the travel time and the known length of the typical section, the evaluation device then calculates the speed of the object.

[0045] In addition, the evaluation device determines the direction of movement of the object based on the pixel image and the reference.

[0046] Fig. 3 shows a person pulling a pallet truck with a package behind them through the gate. The evaluation device uses the reference to identify the pallet truck and Euro pallet, based on their height, as a typical component. The evaluation is performed analogously to Figure 2. Reference symbol list:

[0047] 10 Building opening

[0048] 11 goals

[0049] 12 open door leaf

[0050] 13 Gate drive

[0051] 14 Gate control

[0052] 20 objects

[0053] 21 Rolling table

[0054] 22 Typical length for rolling table

[0055] 23 pallet trucks

[0056] 24 Typical length for pallet trucks

[0057] 30 light grids

[0058] 31 Channel bar

[0059] 32 Receiver bar

[0060] 33 transmitting element

[0061] 34 Receiving element

[0062] 35 Light beam, uninterrupted

[0063] 36 Light beam, interrupted

[0064] 37 Reception element hidden

[0065] 40 transport goods

Claims

Claims:

1. System - to analyse an object passing through an open gate of a building opening - with a light grid - with a variety of individual light barriers - for emitting and receiving light rays - in different and defined heights and - to detect the passage of an object through the open gate - with an evaluation device which is designed to - evaluate the interruption status of the individual light barriers and - to issue a signal when an individual light barrier is interrupted, characterized in that - the evaluation device is designed to - to record and evaluate the duration of changes in interruption states - and from this, together with the different heights, to create a pattern of the object in height and length - to store references in a memory - for different types of objects and - and by applying the reference to the pattern - to identify the type of an object.

2. System according to claim 1, characterized in that - the evaluation device is designed to - to store references in memory - for typical sections with known horizontal length of species, - and by applying the reference to the pattern - to identify the typical section of known length.

3. System according to claim 2, characterized in that - the evaluation device is designed to - to determine a scaling factor for the length of the pattern from the length of the typical section in the pattern and its known length.

4. System according to one of claims 2 to 3, characterized in that - the evaluation device is designed to - to determine the duration of the interruption of a light beam through the typical section with known length and - to determine and / or output the speed of the object from the duration of the interruption and the known length.

5. System according to one of claims 3 to 4, characterized in that - the evaluation device is designed to - select a part of the object - to determine the duration of the interruption of a light beam through a section and - to determine and / or output the speed of the object from the duration of the interruption and the length of the section in the pattern and the scaling factor.

6. System according to one of claims 3 to 5, characterized in that - the evaluation device is designed to - to store references in memory - for parts of species which correspond to a cargo and - for typical widths of goods loads - and by applying the reference to the pattern - to identify the section which corresponds to a cargo load - and to determine the length and height of the goods load from the length and height of the goods load in the pattern and the scaling factor - and to determine and / or output the volume of the goods load from the length, height and typical width of the goods load.

7. System according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that - the evaluation device is designed to - to identify the orientation of the type of object and - to determine and / or output the direction of movement of the object from the orientation.

8. System according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that - the light grid - has at least 2, at least 5, at least 10, at least 20, or at least 40 individual light barriers and / or - has different heights for the light beams in relation to the floor or the lower end of the light barrier bars and / or - has different heights for the light rays at the same distance from each other.

9. System according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that - the interrupt state - there is either an interruption or no interruption in the reception of the light beams of the individual light barriers.

10. System according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that - the evaluation device is designed to - the signal - to be output to the gate control, - to stop the gate from closing.

Images