Device, means of transportation, and method for protecting an on-board electrical system and a switch

By employing an eFuse that detects impedance changes to trigger a shutdown, the electrical protection system in vehicles can rapidly and reversibly disconnect faulty systems, addressing the limitations of traditional fuses and enhancing safety and efficiency.

WO2025113739A1PCT designated stage expired Publication Date: 2025-06-05BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
View PDF 3 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
PCT/DE2024/100984
Authority / Receiving Office
WO · WO
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
Priority Date
2023-11-27
Filing Date
2024-11-21
Publication Date
2025-06-05

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing electrical protection systems in vehicles, such as fuses, are not reversible, respond slowly to faults, and cannot always prevent consequential damage due to their slow response time.

Method used

The use of an eFuse or semiconductor switch that automatically determines a predefined impedance change per unit of time, allowing for early detection and shutdown of a faulty vehicle electrical system by comparing the impedance change with a reference value.

Benefits of technology

Enables rapid and reversible disconnection of a faulty electrical system, reducing the risk of damage and energy loss, and improving the overall safety and efficiency of the protection mechanism.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure DE2024100984_05062025_PF_FP_ABST
    Figure DE2024100984_05062025_PF_FP_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention relates to a device, a means of transportation and a method for securing an on-board electrical system (1) of a means of transportation. The method comprises the steps of automatically identifying a predefined change in impedance per time unit in the on-board electrical system (1), and, in response thereto, automatically opening a switch (2) in the on-board electrical system (1).
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[0001] Device, means of transport and method for protecting an on-board network and a switch

[0002] Description

[0003] The present invention relates to a device, a means of transport, and a method for protecting the electrical system of a means of transport using a switch, in particular an eFuse. An "eFuse" is also referred to in the prior art as a smart FET, a high-switch switch with power protection function, a MOSFET isolating element with extended diagnostics and line protection functions, or similar. In particular, the present invention relates to the most gentle possible shutdown of an electrical system in the event of a fault.

[0004] Modern means of transport have a multitude of electrical consumers. In addition, the electrical power converted in the means of transport, particularly by electric drive trains, is becoming ever greater. Fuses have long proven themselves in the protection of vehicle electrical systems. However, these have the disadvantage that they cannot be triggered reversibly and must be replaced after they have tripped. In addition, they respond relatively slowly, meaning that consequential damage cannot always be avoided in every fault event. For this reason, semiconductor switches, also known as "eFuse", are increasingly being used for protection. These are usually based on a semiconductor switch (MOSFET), which opens / switches off the vehicle electrical system when a certain threshold is reached. The corresponding measured value can be, for example,by measuring an electrical quantity (voltage, current, or impedance), and when the predefined threshold is reached, a signal is issued to trigger the eFuse. eFuses are gradually replacing traditional fuses in vehicle power systems. Their popularity is based on functional safety, which provides very fast (within a few microseconds) selective isolation of fault currents (e.g., electrical short circuits). Fuses, on the other hand, trigger comparatively slowly (several milliseconds). Further advantages include more precise adaptability to the line to be protected. This line can be utilized more effectively or designed closer to the normal load level. This saves material and mass. Furthermore, unlike fuses, the switching state of eFuses is reversible.

[0005] Fig. 2 shows a possible equivalent circuit diagram for the use of an eFuse or a fuse to protect a line 7 of a vehicle electrical system 1. The eFuse is represented abstractly by an ideal switch. Fuse 3 represents an alternative to the eFuse 2. Physically, the eFuse 2 corresponds to a MOSFET. The battery provides a battery voltage UBAT and supplies the load RLOAD via a line 7. Line 7 is represented by a resistor R and an inductance L connected in series with it and is protected from thermal overload by the eFuse 2 or the fuse 3.

[0006] Fig. 3 shows the integrated protection mechanisms known in the prior art in a current-time diagram for protecting an on-board electrical system. An operating range 33 is separated from a fault range 40 by a tripping range 36. A line 31 indicates the maximum current permitted in the normal case / operating range. A line 32 indicates the earliest tripping time for the fuse / eFuse. A double arrow 34 indicates the nominal continuous current. A double arrow 35 indicates the range provided by a current-time algorithm. A double arrow 37 indicates the minimum peak current, while a double arrow 38 indicates a maximum peak current. A vertical line 30 indicates a latest tripping time, which merges into a line 39, which indicates the maximum current required to reach a cable temperature of 105°C.The most important line 41 identifies the overcurrent protection, which is to be provided in accordance with the invention to ensure the functional safety of ASIL-classified components in the form of an overcurrent shutdown.

[0007] There are essentially three protection mechanisms known in the state of the art:

[0008] - Equipment protection (thermal protection of the MOSFET) - Overcurrent-time protection (thermal line protection, overcurrent protection)

[0009] - Undervoltage protection

[0010] If a threshold is exceeded, the faulty on-board power supply is disconnected as quickly as possible. Rapid shutdown is particularly important because the (predominantly inductive) energy stored in the network can cause significant damage or electrical wear to the switch.

[0011] To reduce wear, the fault current should be allowed to run freely during the eFuse shutdown process, preventing destructive voltages from occurring in the vehicle electrical system. To achieve this, state-of-the-art eFuses already utilize freewheeling diodes or the avalanche effect of corresponding MOSFETs. However, the avalanche effect in particular must not be overstressed.

[0012] Fig. 7 shows that during avalanche freewheeling of a current (0 to 70 ps), thermal stress on the MOSFET of over 200 °C can occur. This value is well outside the MOSFET specification. A high inductance of the line to be protected is particularly critical, as it stores a large amount of energy at a fixed cut-off current. Freewheeling of increased energy carries the risk of overloading the avalanche effect or the freewheeling diodes. The amount of energy can be reduced by using a smaller inductance (e.g., short lines in the vehicle electrical system) or by setting the switch-off time very early. In practice, however, the inductance of the vehicle electrical system cannot usually be reduced arbitrarily, as it is predetermined or cannot be influenced due to the geometry of the wiring harness.

[0013] It is an object of the present invention to be able to disconnect a faulty vehicle electrical system area from the power supply as early as possible.

[0014] The above-mentioned object is achieved according to the invention by a method having the features according to claim 1, a device having the features according to claim 8 and a means of transport having the features according to claim

[0015] 10. The subclaims show preferred developments of the invention.

[0016] The method is used to protect or safeguard the electrical system of a vehicle using an eFuse or a switch. The electrical system can be a traction electrical system (medium- or high-voltage electrical system or a conventional 12 V, 24 V, or 48 V electrical system). In order to be able to disconnect the electrical system as early as possible, a predefined impedance change per unit of time or a predefined impedance gradient in the electrical system is automatically determined by measurement. In other words, a change in the impedance amplitude or an impedance swing is determined per predefined time interval and compared with a corresponding predefined reference. The impedance change can be an absolute value or a signed value.In response to a successful comparison / adjustment of the impedance change per unit of time with the reference value, a switch in the vehicle electrical system is automatically opened to de-energize the vehicle electrical system. While in the prior art, eFuses are triggered based on predefined absolute thresholds, a particularly early detection of a critical impedance drop or a critical impedance increase per unit of time can enable early shutdown of the vehicle electrical system in accordance with the invention. This point in time typically occurs before absolute thresholds known in the prior art are reached.

[0017] The automatic determination of the predefined impedance change can include additional steps, which are performed once or repeatedly, preferably during operation of the vehicle. In an optional step, an impedance change is calculated based on a measured input voltage for normal operation and short-circuit operation. In other words, depending on the knowledge of the specification and condition of the on-board electrical system and its components, a respective impedance change is determined for an OK case and a short-circuit case, and then a check is carried out to determine the extent to which a predefined difference or distinguishability is achieved between a calculation result for normal operation and a calculation result for short-circuit operation.If the differences are sufficiently distinguishable, it can then be determined to what extent the measured impedance change exhibits a predefined similarity to the measured input or output impedance change during short-circuit operation. In other words, it can be determined whether the measured impedance change corresponds to short-circuit operation, and in response (as described above), the switch in the vehicle electrical system can be automatically opened. By continuously calculating the impedance change for normal and short-circuit operation, aging effects, temperature effects, and other circumstances can be taken into account, so that the differences between the two states (normal case versus short-circuit case) can always be perfectly distinguished, and an ideal reference value is maintained for the short-circuit case.

[0018] The predefined impedance change can, for example, be defined as a rate of change of 3 ohms / ps. In other words, the impedance of the vehicle electrical system changes by 3 ohms per microsecond when a short circuit occurs. Alternatively, a rate of change of 5 ohms per microsecond, and most preferably a rate of change of 7 ohms per microsecond, can be predefined to distinguish permissible operating conditions from impermissible operating conditions (not acceptable).

[0019] The calculation of the impedance change for normal operation and short-circuit operation can be performed, for example, at cyclically recurring intervals and / or event-based. For example, a determination can be made once every 10 ps or more frequently. An event-based recalculation of the respective impedance change can be performed, for example, depending on a temperature or once per life cycle (wake-up cycle) of the vehicle.

[0020] The predefined impedance change can, for example, be characterized by a minimum impedance change within a predefined period of time. For example, to avoid even the smallest impedance fluctuations with significant gradients, a minimum duration for the presence of the impedance gradient can be specified as a shutdown condition. For example, the gradient can be required for a duration of at least one microsecond, 10 ps, ​​100 ps, ​​or similar to trigger the automatic opening process of the switch proposed by the invention. This prevents non-critical impedance changes or those occurring during normal operation from leading to the shutdown of the vehicle electrical system.

[0021] To prevent the evaluation / calculation of the electrical parameters required by the invention from being performed unnecessarily frequently or during non-critical states of the vehicle electrical system, the determination of the impedance change can be made dependent on a predefined voltage threshold and / or a predefined impedance threshold and / or a predefined current threshold being reached. In other words, a predefined (absolute) threshold of an electrical parameter is used as the trigger for the execution of the method according to the invention in order to reduce the computing power and energy consumption of the evaluation unit.

[0022] The vehicle electrical system protected according to the invention can, for example, have a nominal voltage range of 12 V to 800 V, preferably in the 400 V range. However, application to vehicle electrical systems outside the aforementioned voltage ranges is also possible in principle.

[0023] According to the invention, it is not excluded that the vehicle electrical system is additionally protected by a fuse. In other words, the vehicle electrical system or the vehicle electrical system section can be additionally protected by a fuse, which is provided, for example, in series with the eFuse or switch proposed according to the invention. In this way, physical protection of the vehicle electrical system can be provided that is independent of the current processor load, but is not reversible. In this way, a higher ASIL level is achieved.

[0024] According to a second aspect of the present invention, a device for protecting an on-board electrical system of a means of transport is proposed. The device can comprise an eFuse and / or a MOSFET and / or another electrical switch, which is controlled in the manner according to the invention. For this purpose, the device has a data input, an evaluation unit and a data output. The data input can, for example, be equipped with a measuring instrument for determining an electrical on-board electrical system variable. The evaluation unit can have a microcontroller, a nanocontroller, an FPGA or similar. The data output is at least configured to open the eFuse or the MOSFET or other switch when the evaluation unit obtains corresponding information. The evaluation unit is configured in the manner according to the invention to automatically determine a predefined impedance change per unit of time orto determine a predefined impedance gradient in the vehicle electrical system. If this critical impedance gradient is determined, the evaluation unit is configured to automatically open the switch / MOSFET / eFuse in the vehicle electrical system via the data output in order to de-energize it and, if necessary, dissipate the energy stored in the vehicle electrical system via a freewheeling diode or similar. In this way, the device according to the invention is configured to implement a method according to the first-mentioned aspect of the invention in a manner that is clearly evident in such a way that reference is made to the above explanations with regard to the features, combinations of features, and the advantages resulting from them.

[0025] According to a third aspect of the present invention, a means of transportation is proposed, which is configured, for example, as a car, van, truck, motorcycle, aircraft, and / or watercraft. The means of transportation has an on-board electrical system that is configured to be secured by a method according to the first aspect of the invention or by a device according to the second aspect of the invention. Thus, the features, combinations of features, and advantages of the above statements also apply correspondingly to the means of transportation according to the invention.

[0026] Further details, features, and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description and the figures. They show:

[0027] Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of an embodiment of a means of transport designed according to the invention;

[0028] Fig. 2 is a schematic representation of a protection system for a vehicle electrical system;

[0029] Fig. 3 shows a current-time diagram of operating points of a vehicle electrical system protected according to the invention; Fig. 4 shows a comparison of a short-circuit current and a normal current over time;

[0030] Fig. 5 a comparison of a short-circuit impedance with a normal case impedance over time;

[0031] Fig. 6 shows a comparison of the rate of change of a short-circuit impedance compared to a normal case impedance over time;

[0032] Fig. 7 shows a comparison of temperature, drain-source voltage and drain-source current over time in the event of a fault;

[0033] Fig. 8 is a schematic diagram of an on-board power supply system protected according to the invention with a device according to an embodiment of a device according to the invention; and

[0034] Fig. 9 is a flowchart illustrating steps of an embodiment of a method according to the invention for securing an on-board network of a means of transport.

[0035] Fig. 1 shows a passenger car as a means of transport 10 designed according to the invention, with an on-board electrical system 1, through which an electric motor 5 is supplied with electrical energy via a traction battery 4. A short circuit 6 between the electrical line 8 and the vehicle ground causes a rapid drop in the on-board electrical system voltage, which can be detected according to the invention.

[0036] Fig. 4 shows a comparison of the time behavior of an on-board electrical system current in a short-circuit case 51 and a normal case 52. The maximum current iMax permitted for the normal case is reached after just under two hundred microseconds in the normal case 52. Using an overcurrent shutdown according to the state of the art, shutdown would only occur when the threshold value of 700 A is exceeded (after 150 ps). The threshold value of 700 A was set based on the maximum input current (at 10 mF lMax = 600 A), which is the maximum operating current that should not be switched off under normal circumstances. Fig. 5 shows an output impedance-time diagram for a short-circuit case 51 and a normal case 52. Since in the short-circuit case 51 an inductive characteristic causes the currents to lag behind the voltages, monitoring the current change alone according to the state of the art leads to a delayed detection of the short-circuit.Rather, the inventive monitoring of the impedance change per unit of time enables particularly early detection of the fault and thus a shutdown process with comparatively low energy stored in the vehicle electrical system. In fault case 51, in the steady state, the impedance is lower than the impedance in the intended loaded state of the vehicle electrical system. In the normal case 52, however, a return of the impedance to higher impedance values ​​can be observed (due to the capacitive load characteristics).

[0037] Fig. 6 shows the rate of change of the impedance in the vehicle electrical system for a short circuit 51 and a normal case 52. To enable early detection of the fault, such as the short-circuit current, the impedance increase or decrease per unit of time (impedance gradient) of the eFuse output impedance is monitored. Depending on the load capacitance, the short circuit can be detected early with a defined confidence. Fig. 6 compares the impedance change or the eFuse impedance increase for a short circuit 51 of the capacitive load in the normal case 52. After 22 ps, the short circuit 51 can be differentiated with sufficient confidence from the normal case 52 with a capacitive charging current (10 mA) in the case of a capacitive load of 10 mF. The short circuit is thus detected and switched off at 20 ps and 115 A. The energy quantities that need to be switched according to the invention and the prior art compare as follows:

[0038] - Overcurrent shutdown (state of the art): 490 mJ (2 p, 700 A).

[0039] - Impedance gradient based (according to the invention): 13 mJ (- 97.5%).

[0040] Fig. 8 shows a block diagram of a schematically illustrated equivalent circuit of a vehicle electrical system for the impedance gradient-based shutdown according to the invention. The elements of the electrical system 1 already presented in Fig. 2 are supplemented by a voltage sensor 11, a current sensor 12 as data input 13, an evaluation unit 14, and a data output 15. In addition, the capacitive load C is bridged by a short circuit 6. The data input 13 is configured to measure a voltage and a current at the battery and to provide corresponding measured values. From these, a quotient V / l or ll / l (impedance) is then formed and a time derivative is performed, whereby a differential measured impedance dz meas is provided. Using measured values ​​from the current sensor 12, the evaluation unit 14 provides a differential short-circuit impedance dzsc as well as a differential normal case impedance dzc (capacitive case). If the differential short-circuit impedance dzsc reduced by a reduction ö (e.g. 5% - 20%) is less than or equal to the differential measured impedance, which in turn is less than or equal to the differential short-circuit impedance dzsc subject to a premium ö, and at the same time the normal case impedance dzc reduced by a reduction ö (e.g. 5% - 20%) is not less than or equal to the differential measured impedance dz meas and this, in turn, is less than or equal to the differential normal case impedance dzc, which is subject to a surcharge, the data output 15 is triggered to activate the switch 2 in order to disconnect the battery from the vehicle electrical system 1. Otherwise, the method continues with the verification of the aforementioned condition. In other words, two parallel determinations are carried out, one of which carries out the measurement and the other of which carries out the calculation of electrical quantities. The quantities thus determined are then compared with each other to determine the extent to which a shutdown condition exists. On the one hand, a differential impedance of the vehicle electrical system and, from this, a measurement impedance increase m ZThe measurement is measured or determined. At the same time, a differential input and / or output impedance is calculated using the input voltage u (t) and the current i (t). This calculation is performed for both the normal case (vehicle electrical system with a normal capacitive load) and a short-circuit case. While the normal case model includes a capacitance, the short-circuit model only has an inductive and a resistive component. The two models are therefore as follows:

[0041] Capacitive model: du(t) di(t) d 2 i(t)

[0042] L + i(t) - dt dt dt 2 Short circuit model:

[0043] If the amount of the short-circuit impedance increase is greater than the amount of the normal case impedance increase with a surcharge ö, it is then checked to what extent the amount of the difference of the calculated measurement impedance increase m ZMeasurement and the short-circuit impedance change are smaller than the amount of the short-circuit impedance increase subject to the surcharge ö. If this condition / inequality is met, shutdown occurs by the eFuse tripping.

[0044] In other words, the procedure according to the invention can optionally be described as follows: The impedance increase is measured m Z Measurement and calculated in two models (normal operation / capacitive charging m z i_oad and short-circuit operation m z sc). This requires knowledge of the equivalent resistance R (line + ESR of the capacitance or - short-circuit resistance), line inductance L and component capacitance C. As soon as m zLo ad and m zS c differ sufficiently to provide confidence ö (e.g. 10%), a distinction can be made between short circuit and normal operation with a high degree of confidence. As soon as m z sc and m ZMeasurements are close enough together (deviation of up to ö (e.g. 10%)) and m z i_oad and m z If the sc are far enough apart, a short circuit can be detected with high confidence. Once a short circuit is detected, it is immediately isolated by opening the eFuse.

[0045] Fig. 9 shows steps of an exemplary embodiment of a method according to the invention for securing an on-board electrical system of a means of transport. In step 100, a predefined impedance change per unit of time in the on-board electrical system (gradient of the on-board electrical system voltage) is automatically determined. In step 200, an impedance change is calculated for normal operation and for short-circuit operation based on a measured input voltage and a measured input current. In step 300, it is then checked to what extent a predefined relationship (e.g., difference) between a result of the calculation for normal operation and short-circuit operation has been achieved. In this way, it is determined whether a sufficient distinction between normal operation and short-circuit operation is possible in the present case.In step 400, the extent to which the measured impedance change exhibits a predefined similarity to the calculated impedance change during short-circuit operation is determined. If the predefined similarity is present, a switch in the vehicle electrical system is automatically opened in step 500 to protect it against overload.

[0046] The present invention promises, among other things, the following advantages due to the impedance change-based shutdowns:

[0047] - Reduction of energy loss when switching off a fault current. This reduces stress on the components (e.g., TVS diodes, freewheeling diodes, MOSFET avalanche).

[0048] - Benefits in the technical system are therefore: reduced aging of the components, possible downsizing of the protective circuit and / or eFuses (reduced installation space / smaller PCB).

[0049] - Overlaying the protection mechanism with a classic overcurrent shutdown is useful (redundancy for the shutdown) However, most errors are detected using the impedance-based shutdown.

[0050] - Decomposition of the protection mechanisms - e.g. ASIL B(D) for overcurrent shutdown and ASIL B(D) for impedance-based shutdown results in ASIL D.

[0051] List of reference symbols:

[0052] 1 on-board network

[0053] 2 switches

[0054] 3 fuse

[0055] 4 Traction battery

[0056] 5 Electric motor

[0057] 6 Short circuit

[0058] 7 Line

[0059] 8 Line

[0060] 10 means of transport

[0061] 11 Voltmeter

[0062] 12 ammeters

[0063] 13 Data input

[0064] 14 Evaluation unit

[0065] 15 Data output

[0066] 31, 32 line

[0067] 33 Work area

[0068] 34, 35 double arrow

[0069] 36 trigger range

[0070] 37, 38 double arrow

[0071] 39 Line

[0072] 40 Error case

[0073] 41 Line

[0074] 100 to 500 process steps

Claims

Patent claims:

1. Method for protecting an on-board network (1) of a means of transport (10) comprising the steps: - automatically determining (100) a predefined impedance change per unit of time in the vehicle electrical system (1) and in response thereto - automatic opening (500) of a switch (2) in the vehicle electrical system (1).

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the automatic determination of the predefined impedance change comprises - Calculating (200) an impedance change based on a measured input voltage (UBAT) and / or output voltage and a measured current (I) for - normal operation (52) and - a short-circuit operation (51) and - Checking (300) to what extent a predefined difference between a result of the calculation for normal operation (52) and short-circuit operation (51) has been achieved and - Determining (400) the extent to which the measured impedance change of the input voltage (UBAT) has a predefined similarity to the calculated impedance change of the input voltage in short-circuit operation.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the predefined impedance change comprises the steps of: - Measuring the input voltage (UBAT) and / or output voltage and a current (I), - Determination of a quotient of the input voltage and / or output voltage and the current (I), and - Determine a gradient (d / dt) time derivative of the quotient.

4. Method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the predefined impedance change - is characterized by a minimum impedance change within a predefined period of time.

5. Method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the determination of the impedance change - only occurs when a predefined voltage threshold and / or current threshold is reached.

6. Method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the vehicle electrical system (1) has a nominal voltage of 400 V or 800 V or higher.

7. Method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the vehicle electrical system (1) is additionally protected by means of a fuse (3).

8. Device for protecting an on-board network (1) of a means of transport (10) comprising - a data input (13), - an evaluation unit (14) and - a data output (15), wherein the evaluation unit (14) is configured to automatically determine a predefined impedance change per unit of time in the vehicle electrical system (1) by means of the data input (13) and, in response thereto, - to automatically open a switch (2) in the vehicle electrical system (1) by means of the data output (15).

9. Apparatus according to claim 8, which is arranged to carry out a method according to one of the preceding claims 1 to 7.

10. Means of transport comprising an on-board network (1) which is designed to be secured by means of a method according to one of the preceding claims 1 to 7 and / or by means of a device according to one of the preceding claims 8 or 9.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Method for determining the impedance of an on-board electrical system

    DE102021206362A1

  • Protective relay

    JP1993270303A

  • Method for detecting performance deterioration of components

    US20220291266A1