A blockchain data monitoring method, storage medium and system
Through the blockchain data monitoring method, the problem of unreasonable asset certification results caused by inconsistent certification standards of multiple asset certification institutions is solved. Through node cluster division and authentication results judgment, the rationality of asset certification results is ensured.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202111265397.3
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2021-10-28
- Publication Date
- 2025-02-18
- Estimated Expiration
- 2041-10-28
AI Technical Summary
When the certification standards of multiple asset certification agencies are not the same, it is difficult to avoid obtaining unreasonable asset certification results.
Through the blockchain data monitoring method, the user's asset information to be authenticated is obtained and uploaded to each node of the blockchain. Each node corresponds to an asset certification agency, performs asset authentication and obtains the authentication results of each node. If multiple nodes have the same authentication results, they are divided into node clusters of the same type. Then, it is determined whether there are more than one node cluster on the blockchain. If so, the authentication results of multiple nodes will not be recognized to avoid unreasonable asset authentication results.
Through the blockchain data monitoring method, the confusion of certification results of multiple asset certification institutions is avoided, the rationality of asset certification results is ensured, and unreasonable asset certification results are avoided.
Smart Images

Figure CN113988846B_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to the field of data processing technology, and in particular to a blockchain data monitoring method, storage medium and system. Background Art
[0002] At present, if a user wants to mortgage an asset (such as a real estate mortgage), he or she needs to first authenticate the asset (real estate) to prove the validity of the asset. Therefore, the user will provide the information of the asset to be authenticated to the asset authentication agency (such as a bank). The asset authentication agency authenticates the user's asset to be authenticated according to specific authentication standards and issues a certification result of passing or failing the authentication. However, there are usually multiple asset authentication agencies, and the authentication standards of multiple asset authentication agencies are not all the same. This leads to different authentication results for the same asset to be authenticated by multiple asset authentication agencies, that is, unreasonable authentication results may be obtained. For example, an asset to be authenticated that should have passed the asset authentication may be determined as not passed by a certain asset authentication agency, or an asset to be authenticated that should have failed the asset authentication may be determined as passed by a certain asset authentication agency.
[0003] In the case of multiple asset certification agencies with different certification standards, if only one asset certification agency obtains a certification result that is different from that of the majority of asset certification agencies, the certification result of the different asset certification agency can be directly identified as unreasonable and excluded, thereby obtaining an asset certification result that is more reasonable. However, if multiple asset certification agencies obtain certification results that are different from those of the majority of asset certification agencies, that is, different certification results are supported by multiple asset certification agencies, it is easy to cause confusion in the certification results, making it difficult to distinguish unreasonable certification results, and thus difficult to exclude unreasonable certification results, and it is easy to obtain unreasonable asset certification results. Summary of the invention
[0004] The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is how to avoid obtaining unreasonable asset authentication results when the authentication standards of multiple asset authentication institutions are not completely the same.
[0005] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides a blockchain data monitoring method, wherein the blockchain has multiple nodes, each node corresponds to an asset certification agency, and the method comprises the following steps:
[0006] A. Obtain the user's asset information to be authenticated;
[0007] B. Upload the asset information to be authenticated to each node of the blockchain respectively;
[0008] C. Using the asset authentication agencies corresponding to each node to perform asset authentication on the asset information to be authenticated;
[0009] D. Obtain the certification results of the asset certification agency corresponding to each node;
[0010] E. If the authentication results of multiple asset authentication agencies are the same, the multiple nodes corresponding to the multiple asset authentication agencies with the same authentication results are divided into node clusters of the same type;
[0011] F. Determine whether there is more than one node cluster on the blockchain. If so, do not recognize all the certification results of multiple asset certification agencies corresponding to the multiple nodes of the blockchain.
[0012] Preferably, in step F, if it is determined that there is only one node cluster on the blockchain, the same authentication results of multiple asset authentication agencies corresponding to multiple nodes in the unique node cluster are recognized.
[0013] Preferably, in step F, after the same authentication results of the multiple asset authentication agencies corresponding to the multiple nodes in the unique node cluster are recognized, the authentication results of the asset authentication agencies corresponding to all the nodes are updated to the same authentication results.
[0014] Preferably, in step F, if it is determined that there is no node cluster on the blockchain, relevant information that the asset authentication result is abnormal is output.
[0015] Preferably, the authentication result includes authentication passed and / or authentication failed.
[0016] Preferably, in step C, asset authentication is performed on the asset information to be authenticated by obtaining pre-stored asset data corresponding to the asset information to be authenticated in the asset authentication results corresponding to each node, and then the pre-stored asset data of each asset authentication agency is compared with the asset information to be authenticated for consistency.
[0017] Preferably, if the pre-stored asset data is consistent with the asset information to be authenticated, the authentication result in step D is authentication passed; if the pre-stored asset data is inconsistent with the asset information to be authenticated, the authentication result in step D is authentication failed.
[0018] The present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the blockchain data monitoring method as described above is implemented.
[0019] The present invention also provides a blockchain data monitoring system, comprising a computer-readable storage medium and a processor connected to each other, the computer-readable storage medium being as described above.
[0020] The present invention has the following beneficial effects: if there is more than one node cluster on the blockchain, it means that different authentication results are supported by multiple asset authentication agencies, and it is difficult to distinguish unreasonable authentication results. Therefore, all authentication results of multiple asset authentication agencies corresponding to multiple nodes of the blockchain are not recognized, thereby avoiding unreasonable asset authentication results in the end. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0021] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the blockchain data monitoring method. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022] The present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with specific implementation methods.
[0023] This embodiment provides a blockchain data monitoring system, the blockchain has multiple nodes, each node corresponds to an asset authentication agency, the data asset authentication monitoring system includes a computer-readable storage medium and a processor connected to each other, the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and the computer program is executed by the processor to implement the following Figure 1 The blockchain data monitoring method shown includes the following steps A, B, C, D, E, and F.
[0024] A. Obtain the user's asset information to be authenticated.
[0025] When a user wants to mortgage an asset (such as a real estate mortgage), he or she needs to authenticate the asset (real estate) first to prove the validity of the asset. Therefore, the user's asset information to be authenticated is first obtained, that is, the asset information that the user is preparing to mortgage, in order to authenticate the asset.
[0026] B. Upload the asset information to be authenticated to each node of the blockchain.
[0027] After obtaining the user's asset information to be authenticated, the user's asset information to be authenticated is uploaded to each node of the blockchain. The nodes of the blockchain are servers in each region, and the asset information to be authenticated uploaded to the blockchain will be recorded in each node. Since each node corresponds to an asset authentication agency, each asset authentication agency can obtain the user's asset information to be authenticated from the corresponding node, so as to authenticate the asset to be authenticated according to specific authentication standards.
[0028] C. Use the asset authentication agencies corresponding to each node to perform asset authentication on the asset information to be authenticated.
[0029] The asset authentication agencies corresponding to each node each store multiple pre-stored asset data. After the asset authentication agencies corresponding to each node obtain the asset information to be authenticated, each asset authentication agency is used to perform asset authentication on the asset information to be authenticated. Specifically: the pre-stored asset data corresponding to the asset information to be authenticated in the asset authentication result corresponding to each node is obtained, and then the pre-stored asset data of each asset authentication agency is compared with the asset information to be authenticated for consistency.
[0030] D. Obtain the certification results of the asset certification agency corresponding to each node.
[0031] In this embodiment, the authentication result includes authentication passed and / or authentication failed. After the pre-stored asset data of each asset authentication agency is compared with the asset information to be authenticated for consistency, if the pre-stored asset data of a certain asset authentication agency is consistent with the asset information to be authenticated, the authentication result of the asset authentication agency is authentication passed; if the pre-stored asset data of a certain asset authentication agency is inconsistent with the asset information to be authenticated, the authentication result of the asset authentication agency is authentication failed.
[0032] E. If multiple asset certification agencies have the same certification results, the multiple nodes corresponding to the multiple asset certification agencies with the same certification results are divided into node clusters of the same type.
[0033] Since the asset certification agencies corresponding to each node perform asset certification according to specific certification standards, if the certification standards are different, the asset certification agencies may obtain unreasonable certification results. For example, an asset to be certified that should have passed the asset certification may be determined as not passed by a certain asset certification agency, or an asset to be certified that should not have passed the asset certification may be determined as passed by a certain asset certification agency. Therefore, after obtaining the certification results of the asset certification agencies corresponding to each node, it is determined whether there are multiple asset certification agencies with the same certification results among the certification results of the asset certification agencies corresponding to each node; if so, the multiple nodes corresponding to the multiple asset certification agencies with the same certification results are divided into the same type of node clusters.
[0034] F. Determine whether there is more than one node cluster on the blockchain. If so, do not recognize all the certification results of multiple asset certification agencies corresponding to the multiple nodes of the blockchain.
[0035] Since the certification standards of the asset certification agencies corresponding to multiple nodes are different, the certification results of each asset certification agency are not all the same, and different certification results may be supported by multiple asset certification agencies, that is, different types of certification results may have multiple, so there may be more than one node cluster. In the case of more than one node cluster, it is difficult to distinguish unreasonable certification results. Therefore, it is judged whether there is more than one node cluster on the blockchain. If it is judged that there is more than one node cluster on the blockchain, it means that different certification results are supported by multiple asset certification agencies, and it is difficult to distinguish unreasonable certification results. Therefore, all certification results of multiple asset certification agencies corresponding to multiple nodes of the blockchain are not recognized, so as to avoid unreasonable asset certification results in the end. If it is determined that there is only one node cluster on the blockchain, it means that only one authentication result is supported by multiple asset authentication agencies, and the other authentication results are supported by at most one authentication agency. In this case, the authentication result supported by at most one authentication agency is regarded as an unreasonable authentication result, and the authentication result supported by multiple asset authentication agencies is regarded as a reasonable authentication result, that is, the same authentication results of multiple asset authentication agencies corresponding to multiple nodes in the unique node cluster are regarded as reasonable authentication results, so the same authentication results of multiple asset authentication agencies corresponding to multiple nodes in the unique node cluster are recognized. If it is determined that there is no node cluster on the blockchain, it means that all authentication results cannot be supported by multiple asset authentication agencies. This situation is an unreasonable asset authentication situation, so the relevant information of abnormal asset authentication results is output.
[0036] The above is only an implementation method of the invention, and does not limit the scope of patent protection. Those skilled in the art can make non-substantial changes or substitutions based on the invention, which still fall within the scope of patent protection.
Claims
1. A blockchain data monitoring method, characterized in that: The blockchain has multiple nodes, each node corresponds to an asset certification agency, and the method includes the following steps: A. Obtain the user's asset information to be authenticated; B. Upload the asset information to be authenticated to each node of the blockchain respectively; C. Using the asset authentication agencies corresponding to each node to perform asset authentication on the asset information to be authenticated; D. Obtain the certification results of the asset certification agency corresponding to each node; E. If the authentication results of multiple asset authentication agencies are the same, the multiple nodes corresponding to the multiple asset authentication agencies with the same authentication results are divided into node clusters of the same type; F. Determine whether there is more than one node cluster on the blockchain. If so, do not recognize all the certification results of multiple asset certification agencies corresponding to the multiple nodes of the blockchain.
2. The blockchain data monitoring method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: In step F, if it is determined that there is only one node cluster on the blockchain, the same authentication results of multiple asset authentication agencies corresponding to multiple nodes in the unique node cluster are recognized.
3. The blockchain data monitoring method according to claim 2 is characterized in that: In the step F, after the same authentication results of the multiple asset authentication agencies corresponding to the multiple nodes in the unique node cluster are recognized, the authentication results of the asset authentication agencies corresponding to all the nodes are updated to the same authentication results.
4. The blockchain data monitoring method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: In step F, if it is determined that there is no node cluster on the blockchain, relevant information about the abnormal asset authentication result is output.
5. The blockchain data monitoring method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The authentication result includes authentication passed and / or authentication failed.
6. The blockchain data monitoring method according to claim 5 is characterized in that: In the step C, the asset authentication of the asset information to be authenticated is specifically performed by obtaining the pre-stored asset data corresponding to the asset information to be authenticated in the asset authentication results corresponding to each node, and then comparing the pre-stored asset data of each asset authentication agency with the asset information to be authenticated for consistency.
7. The blockchain data monitoring method according to claim 6 is characterized in that: If the pre-stored asset data is consistent with the asset information to be authenticated, the authentication result in step D is authentication passed; if the pre-stored asset data is inconsistent with the asset information to be authenticated, the authentication result in step D is authentication failed.
8. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the blockchain data monitoring method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7 is implemented.
9. A blockchain data monitoring system, comprising an interconnected computer-readable storage medium and a processor, characterized in that: The computer readable storage medium as claimed in claim 8.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Information verification method, device and system
CN105791246A
Blockchain based asset verification method, device and system
CN107742212A