Project System Contribution Rate Evaluation Method, Device and Computer Equipment

Abstract

The present application relates to a method, device and computer equipment for evaluating the contribution rate of a project system, including: obtaining the key elements of the system combat capability and the system combat capability generation stage in the project system, constructing a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the correspondence between the system combat capability generation stage and the key elements of the system combat capability, obtaining the quantitative data of each element of the project to be evaluated in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle, normalizing the quantitative data of the project to be evaluated based on each element in the matrix to obtain the local contribution rate of each element in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle, and obtaining the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated according to the local contribution rate of the project to be evaluated. This method explores the mechanism of system capability generation from the perspectives of system construction and capability generation, explores the source of the system in the clarification of the system contribution rate, and provides a feasible method for evaluating the system contribution rate of planning projects based on the system capability generation model.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the concept of system contribution rate in the military field, and particularly to a method, device and computer equipment for evaluating the system contribution rate of a project. Background Art

[0002] The era of systemization of "ubiquitous interconnection, intelligent aggregation, information dominance, and system victory" has arrived. The system construction and application of military forces are an inevitable requirement for system confrontation. The paradigm of the development and application of combat systems is changing from "platform-centric" to "system-centric". It is necessary to measure the contribution degree and status to the overall combat ability of the system from a system perspective, and use this as the basic basis for the demonstration, development and use of combat systems and their components.

[0003] The theoretical and practical research on the evaluation of system contribution rate is in the ascendant and has become an important field of system engineering research. The current research mainly focuses on the stage of project establishment demonstration of equipment models, lacking research on system capabilities, and there are problems such as "the generation mechanism of system capabilities is unclear, and it is difficult to calculate system contributions", which are manifested in:

[0004] (1) The combat activities and tasks of the equipment system are not clear, and the requirements for combat and technical performance indicators are not specific;

[0005] (2) The organizational command and control relationship, tactical use principle and functional matching relationship of the equipment are not clear;

[0006] (3) The combat scenarios used by the equipment system are not typical and comprehensive. Summary of the Invention

[0007] Based on this, it is necessary to provide a method, device and computer equipment for evaluating the system contribution rate of a project to solve the above problems.

[0008] A method for evaluating the system contribution rate of a project, the method comprising:

[0009] Obtaining the key elements of system combat capabilities and the stages of system combat capability generation in the project system; the key elements of system combat capabilities are obtained according to the influence degree of the corresponding generation stage of the project; the key elements of system combat capabilities correspond to the stages of system combat capability generation;

[0010] Constructing a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the corresponding relationship between the stages of system combat capability generation and the key elements of system combat capabilities; the elements in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle are the quantitative data of the key elements of system combat capabilities at the stages of system combat capability generation;

[0011] Obtaining the quantitative data of each element of the project to be evaluated in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle;

[0012] Normalize the quantitative data of the project to be evaluated based on each element in the matrix to obtain the local contribution rate of each element in the two-dimensional model matrix of the ability generation cycle.

[0013] Obtain the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated based on the local contribution rate of the project to be evaluated.

[0014] In one embodiment, the projects include: military theory projects, equipment development projects, infrastructure projects, technology R & D projects, training and exercise projects, talent cultivation projects, political work projects, and strategy and policy projects.

[0015] In one embodiment, it further includes: constructing a mapping matrix according to the key elements of the system combat capability and the system combat capability generation stage; wherein, the elements in the mapping matrix are used to measure the quantitative data of the key elements of the system combat capability in the system combat capability generation stage; obtaining a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the mapping matrix and a pre-set weight matrix.

[0016] In one embodiment, the key elements of the system combat capability include: military combat theory, organizational establishment, combat training and exercise, equipment and technical resources, troop education and command, combat post personnel, and battlefield facility support.

[0017] In one embodiment, the system combat capability generation stage includes: the ability element project construction stage, the combat troop ability training and exercise stage, and the system ability joint application stage.

[0018] In one embodiment, it further includes: the ability element project construction stage includes: combat concept development, scheme design and demonstration, system product R & D, integrated test and verification, and troop deployment; the combat troop ability training and exercise stage includes: troop training and exercise; the system ability joint application stage includes: system actual combat confrontation.

[0019] In one embodiment, it further includes: constructing a judgment matrix, which records the corresponding relationship between the relative importance degree between the projects to be evaluated and the quantitative data; determining the quantitative data of each project to be evaluated for each element in the two-dimensional model matrix of the ability generation cycle according to the judgment matrix of each project to be evaluated for each element in the two-dimensional model matrix of the ability generation cycle.

[0020] In one embodiment, the formula for calculating the local system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated with respect to the elements in the two-dimensional model matrix of the ability cycle is:

[0021] Wherein, represents the element in the mapping relationship matrix;

[0022] Obtaining the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated from the local contribution rate of the project to be evaluated includes:

[0023] Calculating the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated, and the formula is:

[0024] An evaluation device for the system contribution rate of a project, the device includes:

[0025] A data acquisition module, configured to acquire the key elements of the system combat capability and the system combat capability generation stage in the project system; the key elements of the system combat capability are obtained according to the influence degree of the generation stage corresponding to the project; the key elements of the system combat capability correspond to the system combat capability generation stage;

[0026] A model construction module, configured to construct a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the corresponding relationship between the system combat capability generation stage and the key elements of the system combat capability; the elements in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle are the quantization data of the key elements of the system combat capability at the system combat capability generation stage;

[0027] A contribution rate calculation module, configured to acquire the quantization data of each element of the project to be evaluated in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle; normalize the quantization data of the project to be evaluated based on each element in the matrix to obtain the local contribution rate of each element in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle; obtain the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated from the local contribution rate of the project to be evaluated.

[0028] A computer device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that when the processor executes the computer program, the steps implemented include:

[0029] Acquiring the key elements of the system combat capability and the system combat capability generation stage in the project system; the key elements of the system combat capability are obtained according to the influence degree of the generation stage corresponding to the project; the key elements of the system combat capability correspond to the system combat capability generation stage;

[0030] Constructing a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the corresponding relationship between the system combat capability generation stage and the key elements of the system combat capability; the elements in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle are the quantization data of the key elements of the system combat capability at the system combat capability generation stage;

[0031] Acquiring the quantization data of each element of the project to be evaluated in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle;

[0032] Normalize the quantitative data of the project to be evaluated based on each element in the matrix to obtain the local contribution rate of each element in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle.

[0033] Obtain the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated from the local contribution rate of the project to be evaluated.

[0034] The above-mentioned project system contribution rate evaluation method, device and computer equipment analyze the combat capability generation stage of the project and the key elements of the system combat capability, thus demarcating the stages and elements of the overall project system. In each stage, the contributions corresponding to each element are different. In order to accurately evaluate the contribution rate of the project system, different elements are quantified in different stages. According to the quantitative data of the key elements of the system combat capability, it can be used as the input item of the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle, so that the system contribution rate of each project can be obtained. From the above process, it can be seen that the evaluation of the project system contribution rate is calculated by analyzing the system capability generation mechanism, decomposing and quantifying the project from different dimensions, so the problem of difficult calculation of the current system contribution rate can be solved. Description of the Drawings

[0035] Figure 1 It is a schematic flow chart of the project system contribution rate evaluation method in an embodiment;

[0036] Figure 2 It is a schematic structural diagram of the project system contribution rate evaluation device in an embodiment;

[0037] Figure 3 It is a schematic diagram of the computer structure in an embodiment. Detailed Description of the Invention

[0038] In order to make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of the present application clearer, the present application will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not used to limit the present application.

[0039] In one of the embodiments, as Figure 1 shown, a project system contribution rate evaluation method is provided, including:

[0040] S100, obtain the key elements of the system combat capability and the system combat capability generation stage in the project system.

[0041] The key elements of the system combat capability are obtained according to the influence degree of the corresponding generation stage of the project; the key elements of the system combat capability correspond to the system combat capability generation stage.

[0042] System operation, from a military science perspective, is a combat pattern formed by the effective integration of numerous combat units and elements. And there are multiple projects in system operation, such as military theory projects, equipment development projects, etc. Specifically, the system contribution rate refers to the sharing rate of a project in the entire system operation.

[0043] In this step, the division of the system operation ability generation stage refers to the process of generating the actual combat ability of the system from the system operation concept according to the requirements of the system mission task, through the construction and structured integration of various system ability elements, the construction and network integration of various combat forces in the system, and the confrontation and link-up combination in multiple combat fields of the system.

[0044] Specifically, when evaluating the system contribution rate of a project, the system operation ability is analyzed in advance. Specifically, the ability stages of the entire combat system are sorted out. Through analysis, the contributions of different stages to different projects are different. By dividing the ability stages, the corresponding contribution rates can be highlighted. Thus, through this dimension, the proportion of the contributions corresponding to different stages to the project can be reflected.

[0045] On the other hand, after multiple stages are divided, each stage corresponds to different stage activities. For example, in the military combat theory stage, it can be subdivided into: combat concept development, scheme design and demonstration, system product research and development, etc. From another perspective, each stage can be subdivided in the same way.

[0046] S110, construct a two-dimensional model of the system operation ability generation cycle according to the corresponding relationship between the system operation ability generation stage and the key elements of the system operation ability.

[0047] The elements in the two-dimensional model of the system operation ability generation cycle are the quantitative data of the key elements of the system operation ability during the system operation ability generation stage.

[0048] The two-dimensional model of the system operation ability generation cycle describes the corresponding relationship between the stages and various stage activities. Through the two-dimensional model of the cycle, the contribution rate proportion of each stage and each stage activity of the project can be accurately reflected.

[0049] The specific contribution proportion is reflected by the element values in the two-dimensional model of the system operation ability generation cycle.

[0050] S120, obtain the quantitative data of each element of the project to be evaluated in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the ability generation cycle.

[0051] For each element in the two-dimensional model of the ability generation cycle, it corresponds to a specific activity stage. Therefore, the score distribution situation corresponding to the project can be obtained based on the quantitative score of the project during system operation.

[0052] S130. Based on the quantitative data of the project to be evaluated, normalize each element in the matrix to obtain the local contribution rate of each element in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle.

[0053] According to the distribution of the scores, and then combined with the weights corresponding to the elements in the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle, normalization can accurately obtain the local contribution rate of the project.

[0054] S140. Obtain the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated by using the local contribution rate of the project to be evaluated.

[0055] The above project system contribution rate evaluation method analyzes the combat capability generation stage of the project and the key elements of the system combat capability, thereby demarcating the stages and elements of the overall project system. In each stage, the contributions corresponding to each element are different. In order to accurately evaluate the contribution rate of the project system, different elements are quantified in different stages. According to the quantitative data of the key elements of the system combat capability, it can be used as the input item of the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle, so that the system contribution rate of each project can be obtained. From the above process, it can be seen that the evaluation of the project system contribution rate is calculated by analyzing the system capability generation mechanism, decomposing and quantifying the project from different dimensions, so it can solve the problem of difficult calculation of the current system contribution rate.

[0056] In one embodiment, the projects include: military theory projects, equipment development projects, infrastructure projects, technology R & D projects, training and exercise projects, talent cultivation projects, political work projects, and strategy and policy projects. In this embodiment, some parts included in the project system are listed. When evaluating the contribution rate of the project system, it is specifically determined by the proportion of the scores of different projects in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle.

[0057] In one embodiment, construct a mapping matrix according to the key elements of the system combat capability and the system combat capability generation stage; wherein, the elements in the mapping matrix are used to measure the quantitative data of the key elements of the system combat capability in the system combat capability generation stage; according to the mapping matrix and the pre-set weight matrix, obtain the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle. The two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle consists of two parts. One part is the weight matrix, which is used to adjust the importance of each element, and the other part is the mapping matrix, which is the actual quantitative data.

[0058] In one embodiment, the key elements of the system combat capability include: military combat theory, organizational establishment system, combat training and exercise, equipment and technical resources, military force education and command, combat post personnel, and battlefield facility support.

[0059] In one of the embodiments, the system combat capability generation stage includes: the construction stage of capability element projects, the training stage of combat force capabilities, and the joint application stage of system capabilities.

[0060] In one of the embodiments, the construction stage of the capability element projects includes: combat concept development, scheme design and demonstration, system product research and development, integrated test and verification, and force installation and deployment; the training stage of combat force capabilities includes: unit training and exercises; the joint application stage of system capabilities includes: system actual combat confrontation.

[0061] Specifically, the above 7 activities are obtained by analyzing each stage. That is to say, each stage includes the above 7 activities, which provides a theoretical basis for establishing a two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle. Specifically, the combat concept development activity is mainly based on the system combat concept and combat mode innovation in military combat theory, and conducts a capability assessment (CBA) on the basis of the combat concept to give the capability gap and the requirements for equipment technology solutions and non-equipment technology solutions. The scheme design and demonstration is specifically to conduct the scheme demonstration of the corresponding capability elements for the two types of scheme requirements in the combat concept development. The system product research and development activity takes technology research and development and equipment research and development as the core, and conducts the construction or transformation of supporting facilities. All combat theory products need to be researched and developed. The integrated test and verification mainly conducts the verification of the combat performance of tactical methods and equipment, the comprehensive integration of equipment technology, and the integrated test and verification of facilities and equipment. The force installation and deployment mainly conducts the work of force organization setting, equipment procurement and installation, and personnel position deployment. Through the above 5 activities, the activities corresponding to the construction stage of the capability element projects are described. In fact, the importance of each activity corresponding to different stages is different. In addition, the unit training and exercises take exercise training as the core, and conduct tactical verification and development, the compilation of combat regulations, personnel skill training, leadership training, and force education. The system actual combat confrontation is based on the fact that actual combat is the only way for the generation of system capabilities. Only in the real system confrontation actual combat can the actual combat capabilities be bred and the results of the generation of system combat capabilities be effectively tested.

[0062] According to the above description, it can be known that on the one hand, the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle of the present invention reflects the description of the contribution rate of different stages to the project from the division of the project generation stage, and on the other hand, reflects the description of the contribution rate of different activities to the project from the activities corresponding to each stage, so as to obtain the system contribution rate of the project.

[0063] In specific implementation, stage division and activity division within each stage are carried out in advance to establish a two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle. The elements corresponding to stages and activities in the model are the key elements of combat capabilities. In the initial stage, each key element of combat capability is fixed. By means of simulation experiment method or expert scoring method, the scores of each key element of combat quota in the project are calculated, and thus the total score of the project can be obtained.

[0064] That is to say, the present invention decomposes the complex project system, and judges the scores of each project using a unified standard, avoiding the problem that the system scores cannot be obtained due to the lack of correlation factors between different projects. On the other hand, from the stage and activity division of the project system, the life cycle of the project is described, which can accurately reflect the impact of the project on the entire project system, and thus can improve the evaluation of the project contribution rate.

[0065] In one embodiment, a judgment matrix is constructed, and the judgment matrix records the corresponding relationship between the relative importance degree among the projects to be evaluated and the quantitative data; according to the judgment matrix of each element in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle for the projects to be evaluated, the quantitative data of each project to be evaluated for each element in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle is determined. In the embodiment, for each project to be evaluated, the contributions to each element in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle are different. For the system contribution, if the contributions to each element are simply normalized and scored, the mutual influence of the contribution degrees between projects is ignored, resulting in inaccurate evaluation of the system contribution rate. In order to consider the true contribution rate of each project, the contribution rate of the project is divided into direct contribution and indirect contribution. The direct contribution is determined by the actual contribution of the project to each element in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle, and the actual contribution is determined by the relative importance among the projects to be evaluated. The indirect contribution is determined by the relative importance degree among the projects to be evaluated through querying the judgment matrix. Therefore, through the above method, projects that have no actual corresponding relationship or contribution in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle can also establish an indirect contribution with the elements in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle, thereby improving the evaluation accuracy of the system contribution rate as a whole.

[0066] Specifically, based on the judgment matrix H ij Perform normalization processing to form a new matrix h ij , where the matrix elements are calculated as

[0067]

[0068] Then use the arithmetic mean method to obtain the project to be evaluated V k The quantitative data in each element M ij in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle The calculation formula is expressed as

[0069]

[0070] In one embodiment, the calculation formula for the local system contribution rate of the item to be evaluated in terms of the elements in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability cycle is as follows:

[0071] where represents the element in the mapping relationship matrix;

[0072] The system contribution rate of the item to be evaluated is obtained by taking the local contribution rate of the item to be evaluated, including:

[0073] The formula for calculating the system contribution rate of the item to be evaluated is:

[0074] In one embodiment, as Figure 2 shown, a device for evaluating the system contribution rate of a project is provided, and the device includes:

[0075] A data acquisition module 202, configured to acquire the key elements of the system combat capability and the system combat capability generation stage in the project system; the key elements of the system combat capability are obtained according to the influence degree of the generation stage corresponding to the project; the key elements of the system combat capability correspond to the system combat capability generation stage;

[0076] A model construction module 204, configured to construct a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the corresponding relationship between the system combat capability generation stage and the key elements of the system combat capability; the elements in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle are the quantified data of the key elements of the system combat capability at the system combat capability generation stage;

[0077] A contribution rate calculation module 206, configured to acquire the quantified data of each element of the item to be evaluated in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle; normalize the quantified data of the item to be evaluated based on each element in the matrix to obtain the local contribution rate of each element in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability generation cycle; and obtain the system contribution rate of the item to be evaluated by taking the local contribution rate of the item to be evaluated.

[0078] In one embodiment, the item to be evaluated includes: military theory project, equipment development project, infrastructure project, technology research and development project, training and exercise project, talent training project, political work project, strategy and policy project.

[0079] In one embodiment, the model construction module 204 is further configured to construct a mapping matrix according to the key elements of the system combat capability and the generation stage of the system combat capability; wherein, the elements in the mapping matrix are used to measure the quantitative data of the key elements of the system combat capability in the generation stage of the system combat capability; according to the mapping matrix and the pre-set weight matrix, a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle is obtained.

[0080] In one embodiment, the key elements of the system combat capability include: military combat theory, organizational establishment, combat training and exercises, equipment and technical resources, military education and command, combat post personnel, and battlefield facility support.

[0081] In one embodiment, the generation stage of the system combat capability includes: the construction stage of the capability element project, the combat force capability training stage, and the joint application stage of the system capability.

[0082] In one embodiment, the construction stage of the capability element project includes: combat concept development, scheme design and demonstration, system product research and development, integrated test and verification, and military force installation and deployment;

[0083] The combat force capability training stage includes: unit training and exercises;

[0084] The joint application stage of the system capability includes: system actual combat confrontation.

[0085] In one embodiment, the contribution rate calculation module 206 is further configured to obtain the values of the elements in the weight matrix by the expert scoring method or the simulation experiment method.

[0086] In one embodiment, the contribution rate calculation module 206 is further configured that the local system contribution rate calculation formula of the to-be-evaluated project with respect to the elements in the two-dimensional model matrix of the capability cycle is:

[0087] Where represents the element in the mapping relationship matrix;

[0088] Obtaining the system contribution rate of the to-be-evaluated project by the local contribution rate of the to-be-evaluated project includes:

[0089] Calculating the system contribution rate of the to-be-evaluated project, the formula is:

[0090] For the specific limitations of the project system contribution rate evaluation device, reference can be made to the limitations of the project system contribution rate evaluation method in the above text, which will not be elaborated here. Each module in the above project system contribution rate evaluation device can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, or a combination thereof. Each of the above modules can be embedded in or independent of the processor in the computer device in the form of hardware, or stored in the memory of the computer device in the form of software, so that the processor can call and execute the operations corresponding to each of the above modules.

[0091] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided. The computer device can be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram can be as Figure 3 shown. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface, a display screen, and an input device connected through a system bus. Among them, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The network interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal through a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, it implements a semantic indexing method for multi-source heterogeneous aerospace data. The display screen of the computer device can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen. The input device of the computer device can be a touch layer covering the display screen, or a button, a trackball, or a touchpad provided on the housing of the computer device, or an external keyboard, a touchpad, or a mouse, etc.

[0092] Those skilled in the art can understand that Figure 3 the structure shown in

[0093] is only a block diagram of some structures related to the solution of this application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of this application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine some components, or have a different component layout.

[0094] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, it implements the steps of the method in the above embodiment.

[0095] Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the methods of the above embodiments can be completed by instructing relevant hardware through a computer program. The computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above methods. Among them, any reference to a memory, storage, database, or other medium used in the various embodiments provided in the present application can include non-volatile and / or volatile memories. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in various forms, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDR SDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link DRAM (SLDRAM), Rambus direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and Rambus dynamic RAM (RDRAM), etc.

[0096] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. For the sake of concise description, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, it should be considered as the scope described in this specification.

[0097] The above-described embodiments merely represent several implementation manners of the present application. Their descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, but they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention patent. It should be noted that for those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the concept of the present application, several modifications and improvements can still be made, and these all belong to the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the patent of the present application should be subject to the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the contribution rate of a project system, characterized in that, The method includes: Obtaining the key elements of the system combat capability and the generation stages of the system combat capability in the project system; the key elements of the system combat capability are obtained based on the influence degree of the corresponding generation stage of the project; the key elements of the system combat capability correspond to the generation stages of the system combat capability; Constructing a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the corresponding relationship between the generation stages of the system combat capability and the key elements of the system combat capability; the elements in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle are the quantitative data of the key elements of the system combat capability at the generation stage of the system combat capability; Obtaining the quantitative data of each element of the project to be evaluated in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle; Normalizing the quantitative data of the project to be evaluated based on each element in the matrix to obtain the local contribution rate of each element in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle; Obtaining the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated according to the local contribution rate of the project to be evaluated; Constructing a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the corresponding relationship between the generation stages of the system combat capability and the key elements of the system combat capability, including: Constructing a mapping matrix according to the key elements of the system combat capability and the generation stages of the system combat capability; wherein, the elements in the mapping matrix are used to measure the quantitative data of the key elements of the system combat capability in the generation stage of the system combat capability; Obtaining the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the mapping matrix and the preset weight matrix.

2. The evaluation method for the contribution rate of a project system according to claim 1, wherein The project to be evaluated includes: military theory projects, equipment development projects, infrastructure projects, technology R & D projects, training and exercise projects, talent cultivation projects, political work projects, and strategy and policy projects.

3. The evaluation method for the contribution rate of a project system according to claim 2, wherein The key elements of the system combat capability include: military combat theory, organizational establishment and system, combat training and exercise, equipment and technical resources, troop education and command, combat post personnel, and battlefield facility support.

4. The evaluation method for the contribution rate of a project system according to claim 2, wherein The generation stages of the system combat capability include: the construction stage of the capability element project, the combat troop capability training and exercise stage, and the stage of joint application of the system capability.

5. The method for evaluating the system contribution rate of a project according to claim 4, wherein The construction stage of the capability element project includes: combat concept development, scheme design and demonstration, system product R & D, integrated test and verification, and troop deployment; The combat troop capability training and exercise stage includes: troop training and exercise; The stage of joint application of the system capability includes: system actual combat confrontation.

6. The project system contribution rate evaluation method according to claim 5, wherein The obtaining of the quantitative data of each element of the project to be evaluated in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle includes: Constructing a judgment matrix, which records the corresponding relationship between the relative importance degree among the projects to be evaluated and the quantitative data; Determining the quantitative data of each project to be evaluated for each element in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle according to the judgment matrix of each project to be evaluated for each element in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle.

7. An evaluation device for the contribution rate of a project system, which is used to implement the evaluation method for the contribution rate of the project system according to any one of claims 1 to 6, and is characterized in that The device includes: A data acquisition module, configured to acquire the key elements of the system combat capability and the generation stages of the system combat capability in the project system; the key elements of the system combat capability are obtained according to the influence degree of the generation stage corresponding to the project; the key elements of the system combat capability correspond to the generation stages of the system combat capability; A model construction module, configured to construct a two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle according to the corresponding relationship between the generation stages of the system combat capability and the key elements of the system combat capability; the elements in the two-dimensional model of the system combat capability generation cycle are the quantitative data of the key elements of the system combat capability at the generation stages of the system combat capability; A contribution rate calculation module, configured to acquire the quantitative data of each element in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle for the project to be evaluated; normalize the quantitative data of the project to be evaluated based on each element in the matrix to obtain the local contribution rate of each element in the matrix of the two-dimensional model of the capability generation cycle; obtain the system contribution rate of the project to be evaluated according to the local contribution rate of the project to be evaluated.

8. A computer device, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that, When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

Images