A base station level evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The application discloses a base station grade evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium, the method comprises the following steps: initially evaluating the grade of each base station to obtain the initial grade of each base station; adjusting the initial grade of each base station according to the total amount of bearing users of each base station to obtain the first grade of each base station; adjusting the first grade of each base station according to the total number of complaints and the number of complaints of each base station to obtain the second grade of each base station; adjusting the second grade of each base station according to the coverage range of each base station and whether it is in a set period to obtain the third grade of each base station; adjusting the third grade of each base station according to whether each base station has power supply capacity to obtain the final evaluation grade of each base station. The application can finely evaluate the grade of the base station and can be widely applied in the technical field of communication.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of communication technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for evaluating base station levels. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, communication network systems in various regions include a large number of base stations. However, existing technology only provides a simple classification of base stations by level. While base station level reflects their importance and is a key reference indicator for cloud network operations such as base station maintenance, optimization, and emergency repair, this simple classification has significant limitations in practice. Often, due to this simplistic classification, it becomes difficult to assess the priority of base station maintenance, requiring substantial time and resources for targeted evaluation, causing delays, impacting maintenance efficiency, and missing optimal processing times.

[0003] Therefore, the above problems urgently need to be solved. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In view of this, embodiments of the present invention provide a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for evaluating base station levels, so as to perform a refined evaluation of base station levels.

[0005] One aspect of this invention provides a method for evaluating base station level, comprising:

[0006] An initial assessment is performed on the level of each base station to obtain the initial level of each base station;

[0007] The initial level of each base station is adjusted according to the total number of users carried by each base station to obtain the first level of each base station;

[0008] The first level of each base station is adjusted based on the total number of complaints and service outages for each base station to obtain the second level of each base station;

[0009] The second level of each base station is adjusted according to its coverage area and whether it is in a set time period to obtain the third level of each base station;

[0010] The third level of each base station is adjusted according to whether each base station has backup power capability, so as to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station.

[0011] Optionally, the initial evaluation of the level of each base station to obtain the initial level of each base station includes:

[0012] An initial assessment of the level of each base station is performed based on the total number of users carried by each base station within a first set period, thereby obtaining the initial level of each base station.

[0013] Optionally, adjusting the initial level of each base station based on the total number of users carried by each base station to obtain the first level of each base station includes:

[0014] The ratio of the uplink and downlink traffic of each base station to the total number of users carried within the first set period is determined as the first ratio.

[0015] The ratio of the total number of target users carried by each base station to the total number of users carried within the first set period is determined as the second ratio;

[0016] The initial level of each base station is adjusted according to the first ratio and the second ratio to obtain the first level of each base station.

[0017] Optionally, adjusting the first level of each base station based on the total number of complaints and outages to obtain the second level of each base station includes:

[0018] Obtain the total number of complaints for each base station within a second predetermined period;

[0019] The ratio of the number of complaints from target users of each base station to the total number of complaints within the second set period is determined as the third ratio;

[0020] Determine the total number of times each base station's outage duration reaches a set duration within the second set period;

[0021] The first level of each base station is adjusted based on the total number of complaints, the third ratio, and the total number of complaints to obtain the second level of each base station.

[0022] Optionally, adjusting the second level of each base station based on its coverage area and whether it is within a set time period to obtain the third level of each base station includes:

[0023] If a preset target location exists within the coverage area of ​​the base station, the corresponding second level is upgraded to obtain the final third level of the base station;

[0024] If there is no preset target location within the coverage area of ​​the base station, the second level of each base station is adjusted according to whether the current time corresponds to the preset target time period in the historical round, so as to obtain the third level of each base station.

[0025] Optionally, adjusting the third level of each base station based on whether each base station has backup power capability to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station includes:

[0026] If the base station does not have backup power capability, the corresponding third level is upgraded to obtain the final evaluation level of the base station;

[0027] If the base station has backup power capability, the third level of the base station is adjusted according to the maintenance difficulty coefficient and backup power duration defined in advance to obtain the final evaluation level of the base station.

[0028] Optionally, the method further includes:

[0029] When multiple base stations experience fault alarms, the maintenance order of the multiple base stations that experienced fault alarms is determined according to the evaluation level.

[0030] Another aspect of this invention provides a base station level evaluation apparatus, comprising:

[0031] The first unit is used to perform an initial assessment of the level of each base station to obtain the initial level of each base station;

[0032] The second unit is used to adjust the initial level of each base station according to the total number of users carried by each base station, so as to obtain the first level of each base station;

[0033] The third unit is used to adjust the first level of each base station based on the total number of complaints and outages of each base station, so as to obtain the second level of each base station.

[0034] The fourth unit is used to adjust the second level of each base station according to the coverage area of ​​each base station and whether it is in a set time period, so as to obtain the third level of each base station;

[0035] The fifth unit is used to adjust the third level of each base station according to whether each base station has backup power capability, so as to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station.

[0036] Another aspect of the present invention provides an electronic device, including a processor and a memory;

[0037] The memory is used to store programs;

[0038] The processor executes the program to implement the base station level evaluation method.

[0039] Another aspect of this invention provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a program that is executed by a processor to implement the base station level evaluation method described above.

[0040] This invention also discloses a computer program product or computer program, which includes computer instructions stored in a computer-readable storage medium. A processor of an electronic device can read the computer instructions from the computer-readable storage medium and execute the computer instructions to cause the electronic device to perform the aforementioned method.

[0041] This invention first evaluates each base station to obtain an initial level. Then, it adjusts the initial level of the base station based on the total number of users carried by the base station's network layer performance indicators to obtain a first level. Next, it adjusts the first level of the base station based on the total number of complaints and service outages corresponding to the complaint intensity of the perception layer to obtain a second level. Finally, it adjusts the second level of the base station based on the coverage area corresponding to the importance of the scenario and whether it is within a set time period to obtain a third level. Finally, it adjusts the third level of the base station based on whether it has backup power capability to obtain the final evaluation level. This invention achieves dynamic evaluation of the base station's level based on multiple dimensions. Compared to existing technologies that only perform simple level divisions, this invention refines the evaluation levels, allowing subsequent maintenance and optimization personnel to more rationally arrange the troubleshooting sequence of base stations based on the fine-grained evaluation levels. Attached Figure Description

[0042] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0043] Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating base station level according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0044] Figure 2 An example diagram of a base station level is provided for an embodiment of the present invention;

[0045] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a process for adjusting the initial level of a base station is provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0046] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of a process for adjusting the first level of a base station according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of a process for adjusting the second level of a base station according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] Figure 6 A schematic diagram illustrating a process for adjusting the third level of a base station, provided as an embodiment of the present invention;

[0049] Figures 7(a) to (d) are schematic flowcharts of an example of base station level evaluation provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0050] Figure 8 A curve diagram showing the changes in tower site-related indicators of a base station provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0051] Figure 9 A structural block diagram of a base station level evaluation device provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0052] Figure 10 This is a structural block diagram of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0053] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this invention clearer, the invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the invention.

[0054] It should be noted that although functional modules are divided in the device schematic diagram and the logical order is shown in the flowchart, in some cases, the steps shown or described may be performed in a different order than the module division in the device or the order in the flowchart.

[0055] The terms "first," "second," or numbered steps in the specification, claims, and accompanying drawings are used to distinguish similar objects and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. For example, numbered steps include S100, S110, or S120, and subsequent related steps, which are not listed here. Furthermore, the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that includes said element.

[0056] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing embodiments of the invention only and is not intended to limit the invention.

[0057] To achieve a more refined assessment of base station levels, this invention proposes a method for base station level evaluation. When evaluating base station levels, the method assesses the importance of the base station based on network layer performance indicators, perception layer complaint intensity, scenario importance, and base station backup power capability, addressing the problem of overly simplistic base station level classification in existing technologies. This evaluation method can be applied to user terminals, servers, or an implementation environment consisting of user terminals and servers. Furthermore, the evaluation method can also be software running on user terminals or servers, such as applications with base station level evaluation functionality. User terminals can be smartphones, tablets, laptops, desktop computers, smart speakers, smartwatches, etc., but are not limited to these. Servers can be independent physical servers, server clusters or distributed systems composed of multiple physical servers, or cloud servers providing basic cloud computing services such as cloud services, cloud databases, cloud computing, cloud functions, cloud storage, network services, cloud communication, middleware services, domain name services, security services, CDN, and big data and artificial intelligence platforms.

[0058] Reference Figure 1 This invention provides a method for evaluating base station level, including steps S100 to S140, as detailed below:

[0059] S100: Perform an initial assessment of the level of each base station to obtain the initial level of each base station.

[0060] Specifically, embodiments of the present invention can perform an initial assessment of a base station based on key factors affecting its level, and the level of the base station can be used to indicate the importance of the base station in the communication system.

[0061] It should be noted that the initial level in the embodiments of the present invention, as well as the first level, second level, third level and evaluation level described in the subsequent steps, are all classification levels made for the base station at different evaluation stages.

[0062] As a further optional implementation, step S100 above may include:

[0063] An initial assessment of the level of each base station is performed based on the total number of users carried by each base station within a first set period, thereby obtaining the initial level of each base station.

[0064] Specifically, the first set period can be freely set, such as one week, half a month, or one month. This embodiment of the invention uses one week as the first set period as an example, that is, the initial level of the base station is evaluated based on the total number of users carried by the base station within one week. Optionally, this embodiment of the invention can pre-set two thresholds, a first threshold and a second threshold, wherein the first threshold is less than the second threshold. First, it is determined whether the total number of users carried is less than the first threshold, between the first and second thresholds, or greater than the second threshold. After determining the numerical range of the total number of users carried, the initial level of the base station is then evaluated.

[0065] S110: Adjust the initial level of each base station according to the total number of users carried by each base station to obtain the first level of each base station.

[0066] Specifically, after assessing the initial level of the base station, the initial level can be dynamically adjusted based on base station information from multiple dimensions. Level adjustment includes maintaining the current level, decreasing the level, and increasing the level. It should be noted that, unless otherwise stated, in this embodiment of the invention, decreasing the level means decreasing by one level, and increasing the level means increasing by one level.

[0067] For example, refer to Figure 2 This invention provides an example diagram of base station levels. Here, Keep Up indicates maintaining the current level, Level Down indicates a decrease in level by one level, and Level Up indicates an increase in level by one level.

[0068] In this embodiment of the invention, base station health levels are categorized from highest to lowest as follows: A+, A1, A2, A3; B+, B1, B2, B3; C+, C1, C2, C3; and D+, D1, D2, D3, totaling 16 levels representing base station health. The initial level can be any one of these 16 levels. Furthermore, this embodiment of the invention can dynamically adjust the initial level based on base station information from multiple dimensions. After adjustment, the base station's level can be increased to a maximum of A+ and decreased to a minimum of D3. Optionally, in subsequent embodiments, each level and the adjusted level can be referenced... Figure 2 The examples shown will not be repeated hereafter.

[0069] Reference Figure 3 As a further optional implementation, step S110 above may include:

[0070] S300: Determine the ratio of the uplink and downlink traffic of each base station to the total number of users carried within the first set period, as the first ratio.

[0071] Specifically, taking the first set period of one week in step S100 as an example, the ratio of the uplink and downlink traffic of each base station to the total number of users carried by the base station within one week is determined. This ratio is used as the first ratio and compared with the pre-set third threshold and fourth threshold. The third threshold is less than the fourth threshold. If the first ratio is less than the third threshold, the initial level is reduced to the first level. If the first ratio is between the third threshold and the fourth threshold, the initial level is kept unchanged and used as the first level. If the first ratio is greater than the fourth threshold, the initial level is increased to the first level.

[0072] S301: Determine the ratio of the total number of target users carried by each base station to the total number of carried users within the first set period, as the second ratio.

[0073] Specifically, target users can be tagged users, such as members or users with good credit.

[0074] The second ratio is compared with the pre-set fifth and sixth thresholds, where the fifth threshold is less than the sixth threshold. If the second ratio is less than the fifth threshold, the initial level is reduced to the first level. If the second ratio is between the fifth and sixth thresholds, the initial level remains unchanged and is used as the first level. If the second ratio is greater than the sixth threshold, the initial level is increased to the first level.

[0075] S302: Adjust the initial level of each base station according to the first ratio and the second ratio to obtain the first level of each base station.

[0076] Specifically, in this embodiment of the invention, the initial level of the base station can be adjusted first according to the first ratio, and then the initial level can be adjusted again according to the second ratio to obtain the first level.

[0077] S120: Adjust the first level of each base station according to the total number of complaints and outages of each base station to obtain the second level of each base station.

[0078] Specifically, the total number of complaints against each base station is obtained by counting the number of complaints from each user, and the number of outages indicates the number of times the base station has been taken offline and stopped operating.

[0079] Reference Figure 4 As a further optional implementation, step S120 above may include:

[0080] S400: Obtain the total number of complaints for each base station within a second set period.

[0081] Specifically, the second period can be set freely, such as a quarter, half a year, or a year. This embodiment of the invention will be described using half a year as an example, so that the total number of complaints for each base station within half a year can be obtained.

[0082] The total number of complaints is then compared with the preset seventh and eighth thresholds. If the total number of complaints is less than the seventh threshold, the first level is lowered to the second level. If the total number of complaints is between the seventh and eighth thresholds, the first level remains unchanged and is used as the second level. If the total number of complaints reaches the eighth threshold, the first level is raised to the second level.

[0083] S401: Determine the ratio of the number of complaints from the target user of each base station to the total number of complaints within the second set period, as the third ratio.

[0084] Specifically, the third ratio is compared with the preset first and tenth thresholds. The ninth threshold is less than the tenth threshold. If the third ratio is less than the ninth threshold, the first level is reduced to the second level. If the third ratio is between the ninth and tenth thresholds, the first level is kept unchanged and used as the second level. If the third ratio reaches the tenth threshold, the first level is increased to the second level.

[0085] S402: Determine the total number of times each base station's outage duration reaches the set duration within the second set period.

[0086] Specifically, if the total number of times the server is offline for a set duration is greater than the set threshold, the server will be upgraded from the first level to the second level. If the total number of times the server is offline for a set duration is less than or equal to the set threshold, the server will remain at the first level and will be upgraded to the second level.

[0087] S403: Adjust the first level of each base station based on the total number of complaints, the third ratio, and the total number of complaints to obtain the second level of each base station.

[0088] Specifically, in the embodiments of the present invention, the first level can be adjusted according to the total number of complaints, the third ratio, and the total number of complaints, and then the second level can be obtained.

[0089] S130: Adjust the second level of each base station according to the coverage area of ​​each base station and whether it is in a set time period to obtain the third level of each base station.

[0090] Specifically, in this embodiment of the invention, the second level of the base station can be adjusted according to the coverage area of ​​the base station and whether the base station is in a set time period when it is evaluated, so as to obtain the third level.

[0091] Reference Figure 5As a further optional implementation, step S130 above may include:

[0092] S500: If a preset target location exists within the coverage area of ​​the base station, the corresponding second level is upgraded to obtain the final third level of the base station.

[0093] Specifically, the preset target location can be a specific location such as a transportation hub or a marked building. If the base station's coverage area includes the target location, the base station can be upgraded from the second level to the third level. If the target location is not permanently located within the base station's coverage area, the base station can remain at the second level and remain at the third level.

[0094] S501: If there is no preset target location within the coverage area of ​​the base station, the second level of each base station is adjusted according to whether the current time corresponds to the preset target time period in the historical round, so as to obtain the third level of each base station.

[0095] Specifically, the target time period can be a period of time with certain regularity, such as the flood season, the opening period of tourist attractions, or the opening period of exhibitions. If, according to the above regularity, the current time falls within the target time period in historical time, the base station is upgraded from the second level to the third level; otherwise, the base station remains at the second level and is classified as the third level.

[0096] S140: Adjust the third level of each base station according to whether each base station has backup power capability to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station.

[0097] Specifically, the backup power capability of a base station can reflect its robustness. Therefore, in this embodiment of the invention, after evaluating the base station level in the above-mentioned dimensions, the level is evaluated based on the robustness of the base station, and the level obtained in this stage is taken as the final evaluation level.

[0098] Reference Figure 6 As a further optional implementation, step S140 above may include:

[0099] S600: If the base station does not have backup power capability, then the corresponding third level is upgraded to obtain the final evaluation level of the base station.

[0100] Specifically, if a base station does not have backup power capability, it can be considered that the base station has poor robustness, and thus the base station can be upgraded by more than one level, that is, at least two levels. Optionally, embodiments of the present invention can upgrade a base station that does not have backup power capability by two levels.

[0101] S601: If the base station has backup power capability, the third level of the base station is adjusted according to the maintenance difficulty coefficient and backup power duration defined in advance to obtain the final evaluation level of the base station.

[0102] Specifically, the equipment conditions of each base station are different, and the location of the base station directly affects the degree of remoteness, the ruggedness of the route, and the difficulty of coordination and communication, which in turn leads to different maintenance difficulties. Therefore, a maintenance difficulty coefficient for each base station can be predefined, and then this maintenance difficulty coefficient can be multiplied by a standardized backup power duration. The result of the multiplication is compared with the pre-set eleventh and twelfth thresholds. If the eleventh threshold is less than the twelfth threshold, the third level is raised to obtain the final evaluation level. If the result of the multiplication is greater than or equal to the eleventh threshold and less than the twelfth threshold, the third level is kept unchanged and used as the final evaluation level. If the result of the multiplication is greater than or equal to the twelfth threshold, the third level is lowered to obtain the final evaluation level.

[0103] This invention provides a detailed classification of base station importance into 16 levels based on network layer performance indicators, perception layer complaint intensity, scenario importance, and base station backup power capability. It also periodically reclassifies the importance of base stations based on existing network users, traffic, and base station robustness to achieve dynamic adjustment and intelligent optimization.

[0104] Furthermore, embodiments of the present invention may also include the following steps:

[0105] S150: When multiple base stations experience fault alarms, the maintenance order of the multiple base stations experiencing fault alarms is determined according to the evaluation level.

[0106] Specifically, the higher the evaluation level, the greater the importance of the base station. Therefore, in this embodiment of the invention, the base station with the highest evaluation level can be prioritized for maintenance.

[0107] As a further optional implementation, embodiments of the present invention may also include:

[0108] By obtaining the assessment level of each base station at peak times, resources, energy, or bandwidth, and other configurable materials are prioritized and allocated to base stations with higher assessment levels, thereby achieving reasonable resource allocation.

[0109] The application process of this invention will be illustrated with specific examples below.

[0110] This invention dynamically evaluates the base station's level from multiple dimensions, refining the evaluation level of the base station, which facilitates maintenance and optimization personnel to more rationally arrange the troubleshooting sequence, including the following:

[0111] 1. Based on the multi-dimensional evaluation of base stations, the evaluation level of base stations is further refined on the existing base station level, and the base station level evaluation method provided in the embodiments of the present invention can be output as a base station level evaluation model;

[0112] 2. Conduct periodic assessments of the maintenance and scheduling of all grade-level sites, and output a list of areas lagging behind in grade-level maintenance and rectification measures;

[0113] 3. Explore in depth the application scenarios of base station level assessment, including tower emergency repair power generation, guarantee level, 2G network shutdown, shared base station dismantling, and poor quality cells.

[0114] Next, referring to Figures 7(a) to (d) and the above... Figure 2 The embodiments of the present invention will be described.

[0115] Specifically, Steps 1 through 3 are explained in detail below:

[0116] First, it should be noted that N0 to N6 and M0 to M6 are all threshold values ​​preset in the embodiments of the present invention.

[0117] Step 1: Initial level assessment.

[0118] The number of users within a given period is a crucial indicator for assessing the importance of a base station. Therefore, the entire process prioritizes evaluating the initial level of a base station based on the number of users it carries within a week.

[0119] When the number of users is greater than or equal to M0, the initial rating of the base station is B1.

[0120] When the number of users is less than N0, the initial rating of the base station is B3.

[0121] When N0 ≤ number of users < M0, the initial level assessment of the base station is C1.

[0122] It should be noted that the adjustable initial levels mentioned above are not limited to the three initial levels shown. Please refer to the relevant documentation for the classification of each level. Figure 2 .

[0123] Step 2: Adjust the dynamic level of the base station.

[0124] After completing the initial base station rating assessment, the initial rating of the base station needs to be dynamically adjusted from multiple dimensions:

[0125] 1) Dynamic evaluation of network layers:

[0126] a. User traffic determination:

[0127] Define K1 as the ratio of uplink / downlink traffic generated by the base station this week to the total number of users it supports.

[0128] When K1≥M1, the base station evaluation level is Level Up;

[0129] When K1 < N1, the base station evaluation level is down.

[0130] When N1≤K1<M1, the base station evaluation level keeps up;

[0131] b. Determining the proportion of target users:

[0132] Define K2 as the ratio of the total number of target users carried by the base station to the total number of users carried this week.

[0133] When K2≥M2, the base station evaluation level is up.

[0134] When K2 < N2, the base station evaluation level is down.

[0135] When N2≤K2<M2, the base station evaluation level keeps up;

[0136] 2) Dynamic evaluation of the perception layer:

[0137] a. Determination of the number of base station complaints:

[0138] The number of complaints related to base stations within six months is defined as K3:

[0139] When K3≥M3, the base station evaluation level is Level Up;

[0140] When K3 < N3, the base station evaluation level is down.

[0141] When N3≤K3<M3, the base station evaluation level keeps up;

[0142] b. Determination of the base station target user complaint ratio:

[0143] K4 is defined as the ratio of the number of complaints from target users related to the base station to the total number of complaints within six months: when K4 ≥ M4, the base station's evaluation level is Level Up.

[0144] When K4 < N4, the base station evaluation level is down.

[0145] When N4≤K4<M4, the base station evaluation level keeps up.

[0146] c. Determination of base station outage count:

[0147] Define K5 as the total number of times a base station has been out of service for a duration ≥ X (h) within six months:

[0148] When K5 > M5, the base station evaluation level is Level Up.

[0149] When K4≤M5, the base station evaluation level remains up.

[0150] 3) Dynamic scenario evaluation:

[0151] a. Determination of whether someone is a regular resident in a key location (i.e., the target location):

[0152] Verify whether the base station covers specific locations such as transportation hubs or marked buildings:

[0153] The base station coverage of this type of target location has been confirmed, and the base station assessment level has been upgraded.

[0154] For non-resident target locations, keep up with the base station assessment level.

[0155] b. Determination of whether it is a target time period:

[0156] Verify whether the base station covers periods with certain patterns, such as the flood season, the opening period of tourist attractions, and the opening period of exhibitions.

[0157] Determine whether the current time falls within the target time period of previous years. If it is confirmed that the base station belongs to the target time period in the current year, the base station's assessment level is upgraded.

[0158] Determine whether the current time falls within the target time period of previous years. If it is confirmed that the base station does not belong to the target time period at the current time, the base station's assessment level will be kept up.

[0159] The base station coverage area is for non-resident critical scenarios, and the base station assessment level should be kept up.

[0160] 4) Dynamic assessment of robustness:

[0161] a. Confirm the base station's backup power capacity:

[0162] Verify whether the base station has backup power capability. If the base station does not have backup power capability, the base station's assessment level is increased by 2, meaning it is upgraded by two levels. When the base station has backup power capability, a maintenance difficulty coefficient is defined to assess the ease of maintenance. The remoteness of the base station, the ruggedness of the route, and the difficulty of communicating with property management all affect the maintenance difficulty coefficient. The more difficult the base station is to maintain, the higher the coefficient.

[0163] Define (backup power duration (h) / 72) * maintenance difficulty coefficient K6:

[0164] When K6≥M6, the base station evaluation level is down.

[0165] When K6 < N6, the base station evaluation level is upgraded.

[0166] When N6≤K6<M6, the base station evaluation level keeps up.

[0167] Step 3: Base station star rating assessment and classification:

[0168] After adjusting the base station level based on the above rules, the current level of the base station is determined. The levels are defined from high to low as follows: A+, A1, A2, A3; B+, B1, B2, B3; C+, C1, C2, C3; D+, D1, D2, D3, totaling 16 base station health levels. Furthermore, in this embodiment of the invention, the base station health assessment level can be obtained simultaneously when a base station fault alarm occurs, so as to determine the priority of maintenance processing.

[0169] Furthermore, this embodiment of the invention also provides another specific example.

[0170] During a certain trial period, a pilot project was conducted on the tower sites of a certain city company. Based on the base station level assessment, the 2,322 tower base stations in the city were adjusted and optimized according to eight threshold indicators for level assessment. Using the base station level assessment method provided by this invention, 383 Class A sites were matched and listed as key protection sites to prioritize the protection of hidden danger inspection and investigation, backup power rectification, power generation during service outages, and handling of user complaints.

[0171] Relevant threshold values ​​were adjusted and optimized based on relevant data, and critically protected sites were pushed to the city company's wireless maintenance and network optimization departments. The city company, based on the tower site level, conducted tiered inspections, hazard rectification, quality improvement processing, and high-load voltage reduction, helping frontline personnel to proactively identify problematic sites with hidden dangers, poor quality, or high loads, reducing the occurrence of sudden failures. Relevant tower site indicators were continuously tracked in the fourth quarter of a given year and the first quarter of the following year; specific indicators are as follows... Figure 8 As shown, in Figure 8 On the right side of the graph shown, from bottom to top, each curve corresponds to the average outage time of a poor-quality VoLTE cell (H), a poor-quality cell of type 3 (I), a 4 / 5GAB type cell (J), a high-load 4G cell (K), a timely generation rate (L), and a timely fault handling rate (M).

[0172] Through the above practical examples, it has been verified that the refined classification of base station levels in this embodiment of the invention highlights the importance of certain scenarios during specific time periods, while reducing the priority of such scenarios during non-critical time periods. This clarifies the primary and secondary tasks of the daily production operations of the maintenance and scheduling system, and provides more precise support for the priority of base station maintenance and optimization.

[0173] Reference Figure 9 This invention provides a base station level evaluation device, comprising:

[0174] The first unit is used to perform an initial assessment of the level of each base station to obtain the initial level of each base station;

[0175] The second unit is used to adjust the initial level of each base station according to the total number of users carried by each base station, so as to obtain the first level of each base station;

[0176] The third unit is used to adjust the first level of each base station based on the total number of complaints and outages of each base station, so as to obtain the second level of each base station.

[0177] The fourth unit is used to adjust the second level of each base station according to the coverage area of ​​each base station and whether it is in a set time period, so as to obtain the third level of each base station;

[0178] The fifth unit is used to adjust the third level of each base station according to whether each base station has backup power capability, so as to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station.

[0179] The specific implementation of the evaluation device is basically the same as the specific implementation of the evaluation method described above, and will not be repeated here.

[0180] This invention also provides an electronic device, which includes a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and the processor executes the computer program to implement the above-described evaluation method. This electronic device can be any smart terminal, including tablet computers, in-vehicle computers, etc.

[0181] Specifically, electronic devices can be user terminals or servers.

[0182] This invention takes an electronic device as a user terminal as an example, as detailed below:

[0183] like Figure 10 As shown, the electronic device 1000 may include an RF (Radio Frequency) circuit 1010, a memory 1020 including one or more computer-readable storage media, an input unit 1030, a display unit 1040, a sensor 1050, an audio circuit 1060, a short-range wireless transmission module 1070, a processor 1080 including one or more processing cores, and a power supply 1090, among other components. Those skilled in the art will understand that... Figure 10 The device structure shown does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device and may include more or fewer components than shown, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.

[0184] The RF circuit 1010 can be used for receiving and transmitting signals during information transmission or calls. Specifically, it receives downlink information from the base station and hands it over to one or more processors 1080 for processing; additionally, it transmits uplink data to the base station. Typically, the RF circuit 1010 includes, but is not limited to, an antenna, at least one amplifier, a tuner, one or more oscillators, a Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) card, a transceiver, a coupler, an LNA (Low Noise Amplifier), a duplexer, etc. Furthermore, the RF circuit 1010 can also communicate wirelessly with networks and other devices. Wireless communication can use any communication standard or protocol, including but not limited to GSM (Global System for Mobile communication), GPRS (General Packet Radio Service), CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access), WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access), LTE (Long Term Evolution), email, SMS (Short Messaging Service), etc.

[0185] The memory 1020 can be used to store software programs and modules. The processor 1080 executes various functional applications and data processing by running the software programs and modules stored in the memory 1020. The memory 1020 may mainly include a program storage area and a data storage area. The program storage area may store the operating system, application programs required for at least one function (such as sound playback function, image playback function, etc.), etc.; the data storage area may store data created according to the use of the device 1000 (such as audio data, telephone book, etc.). In addition, the memory 1020 may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other volatile solid-state storage device. Accordingly, the memory 1020 may also include a memory controller to provide access to the memory 1020 by the processor 1080 and the input unit 1030. Although Figure 10 The RF circuit 1010 is shown, but it is understood that it is not a necessary component of the device 1000 and can be omitted as needed without changing the nature of the invention.

[0186] The input unit 1030 can be used to receive input numerical or character information, and to generate keyboard, mouse, joystick, optical, or trackball signal inputs related to user settings and function control. Specifically, the input unit 1030 may include a touch-sensitive surface 1031 and other input devices 1032. The touch-sensitive surface 1031, also known as a touch display screen or touchpad, can collect touch operations performed by the user on or near it (such as operations performed by the user using a finger, stylus, or any suitable object or accessory on or near the touch-sensitive surface 1031), and drive the corresponding connection device according to a pre-set program. Optionally, the touch-sensitive surface 1031 may include two parts: a touch detection device and a touch controller. The touch detection device detects the user's touch position and the signal generated by the touch operation, and transmits the signal to the touch controller; the touch controller receives touch information from the touch detection device, converts it into touch point coordinates, sends it to the processor 1080, and can receive and execute commands from the processor 1080. In addition, the touch-sensitive surface 1031 can be implemented using various types such as resistive, capacitive, infrared, and surface acoustic wave. Besides the touch-sensitive surface 1031, the input unit 1030 may also include other input devices 1032. Specifically, other input devices 1032 may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: a physical keyboard, function keys (such as volume control buttons, power buttons, etc.), a trackball, a mouse, and a joystick.

[0187] The display unit 1040 can be used to display information input by the user or information provided to the user, as well as various graphical user interfaces for controlling the 1000. These graphical user interfaces can be composed of graphics, text, icons, video, and any combination thereof. The display unit 1040 may include a display panel 1041, which may optionally be configured as an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode), or similar display. Furthermore, a touch-sensitive surface 1031 may cover the display panel 1041. When the touch-sensitive surface 1031 detects a touch operation on or near it, it transmits the information to the processor 1080 to determine the type of touch event. Subsequently, the processor 1080 provides corresponding visual output on the display panel 1041 according to the type of touch event. Although in Figure 10 In this embodiment, the touch-sensitive surface 1031 and the display panel 1041 are implemented as two separate components to realize input and output functions. However, in some embodiments, the touch-sensitive surface 1031 and the display panel 1041 can be integrated to realize input and output functions.

[0188] The electronic device 1000 may also include at least one sensor 1050, such as a light sensor, a motion sensor, and other sensors. Specifically, the light sensor may include an ambient light sensor and a proximity sensor. The ambient light sensor can adjust the brightness of the display panel 1041 according to the ambient light level, and the proximity sensor can turn off the display panel 1041 and / or backlight when the device 1000 is moved to the ear. As a type of motion sensor, a gravity acceleration sensor can detect the magnitude of acceleration in various directions (generally three axes). When stationary, it can detect the magnitude and direction of gravity and can be used for applications that recognize the phone's posture (such as landscape / portrait switching, related games, magnetometer posture calibration), vibration recognition-related functions (such as pedometers, taps), etc. Other sensors that the device 1000 may be configured with, such as gyroscopes, barometers, hygrometers, thermometers, and infrared sensors, will not be described in detail here.

[0189] Audio circuitry 1060, speaker 1061, and microphone 1062 provide an audio interface between the user and device 1000. Audio circuitry 1060 converts received audio data into electrical signals and transmits them to speaker 1061, where speaker 1061 converts them into sound signals for output. Conversely, microphone 1062 converts collected sound signals into electrical signals, which are then received by audio circuitry 1060, converted back into audio data, and processed by processor 1080 before being transmitted via RF circuitry 1010 to another control device, or output to memory 1020 for further processing. Audio circuitry 1060 may also include an earphone jack to facilitate communication between peripheral headphones and device 1000.

[0190] The short-range wireless transmission module 1070 can be a WIFI (wireless fidelity) module, Bluetooth module, or infrared module, etc. Device 1000 can transmit information with the wireless transmission module installed on the battle equipment via the short-range wireless transmission module 1070.

[0191] Processor 1080 is the control center of device 1000. It connects various parts of the control device via various interfaces and lines. By running or executing software programs and / or modules stored in memory 1020, and by calling data stored in memory 1020, it performs various functions of device 1000 and processes data, thereby providing overall monitoring of the control device. Optionally, processor 1080 may include one or more processing cores; optionally, processor 1080 may integrate an application processor and a modem processor, wherein the application processor mainly handles the operating system, user interface, and applications, and the modem processor mainly handles wireless communication. It is understood that the aforementioned modem processor may not be integrated into processor 1050.

[0192] The device 1000 also includes a power supply 1090 (such as a battery) to power various components. Preferably, the power supply can be logically connected to the processor 1080 through a power management system, thereby enabling functions such as charging, discharging, and power consumption management through the power management system. The power supply 1090 may also include one or more DC or AC power supplies, recharging systems, power fault detection circuits, power converters or inverters, power status indicators, and other arbitrary components.

[0193] Although not shown, device 1000 may also include a camera, Bluetooth module, etc., which will not be described in detail here.

[0194] This invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the above-described evaluation method.

[0195] Memory, as a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, can be used to store non-transitory software programs and non-transitory computer-executable programs. Furthermore, memory may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-transitory memory, such as at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other non-transitory solid-state storage device. In some embodiments, memory may optionally include memory remotely located relative to the processor, and these remote memories can be connected to the processor via a network. Examples of such networks include, but are not limited to, the Internet, intranets, local area networks, mobile communication networks, and combinations thereof.

[0196] This invention also discloses a computer program product or computer program, which includes computer instructions stored in a computer-readable storage medium. A processor of an electronic device can read the computer instructions from the computer-readable storage medium, and the processor executes the computer instructions, causing the electronic device to perform... Figure 1 The method shown.

[0197] In some alternative embodiments, the functions / operations mentioned in the block diagrams may not occur in the order shown in the operation diagrams. For example, depending on the functions / operations involved, two consecutively shown blocks may actually be executed substantially simultaneously, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in reverse order. Furthermore, the embodiments presented and described in the flowcharts of this invention are provided by way of example to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the technology. The disclosed methods are not limited to the operations and logic flows presented herein. Alternative embodiments are contemplated in which the order of various operations is altered and sub-operations described as part of a larger operation are executed independently.

[0198] Furthermore, although the invention has been described in the context of functional modules, it should be understood that, unless otherwise stated, one or more of the described functions and / or features may be integrated into a single physical device and / or software module, or one or more functions and / or features may be implemented in a separate physical device or software module. It is also understood that a detailed discussion of the actual implementation of each module is unnecessary for understanding the invention. Rather, given the properties, functions, and internal relationships of the various functional modules in the apparatus disclosed herein, the actual implementation of the module will be understood within the scope of conventional skill of an engineer. Therefore, those skilled in the art can implement the invention as set forth in the claims using ordinary techniques without excessive experimentation. It is also understood that the specific concepts disclosed are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is determined by the full scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

[0199] If the aforementioned functions are implemented as software functional units and sold or used as independent products, they can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or a part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause an electronic device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0200] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a processor-included system, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit programs for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0201] More specific examples of computer-readable media (a non-exhaustive list) include: electrical connections (electronic devices) having one or more wires, portable computer disk drives (magnetic devices), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and portable optical disc read-only memory (CDROM). Furthermore, computer-readable media can even be paper or other suitable media on which the program can be printed, because the program can be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium, followed by editing, interpreting, or otherwise processing as necessary, and then stored in computer memory.

[0202] It should be understood that various parts of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented in software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one or a combination of the following techniques known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logical functions on data signals, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable gate arrays (PGAs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.

[0203] In the description of this specification, references to terms such as "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "example," "specific example," or "some examples," etc., indicate that a specific feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with that embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the invention. In this specification, the illustrative expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples.

[0204] Although embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, those skilled in the art will understand that various changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made to these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the claims and their equivalents.

[0205] The above is a detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described. Those skilled in the art can make various equivalent modifications or substitutions without departing from the spirit of the present invention. All such equivalent modifications or substitutions are included within the scope defined by the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating base station level, characterized in that, include: An initial assessment is performed on the level of each base station to obtain the initial level of each base station; The initial level of each base station is adjusted according to the total number of users carried by each base station to obtain the first level of each base station; The first level of each base station is adjusted based on the total number of complaints and service outages for each base station to obtain the second level of each base station; The second level of each base station is adjusted according to its coverage area and whether it is in a set time period to obtain the third level of each base station; The third level of each base station is adjusted according to whether each base station has backup power capability, so as to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station; The step of adjusting the second level of each base station based on its coverage area and whether it is within a set time period to obtain the third level of each base station includes: If a preset target location exists within the coverage area of ​​the base station, the corresponding second level is upgraded to obtain the final third level of the base station; If there is no preset target location within the coverage area of ​​the base station, the second level of each base station is adjusted according to whether the current time corresponds to the preset target time period in the historical round, so as to obtain the third level of each base station; The step of adjusting the third level of each base station based on whether each base station has backup power capability to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station includes: If the base station does not have backup power capability, the corresponding third level is upgraded to obtain the final evaluation level of the base station; If the base station has backup power capability, the third level of the base station is adjusted according to the maintenance difficulty coefficient and backup power duration defined in advance to obtain the final evaluation level of the base station. The maintenance difficulty coefficient is multiplied by the standardized backup power duration to obtain the multiplication result. The multiplication result is then compared with two pre-set thresholds. Based on the comparison result, the third level is raised, kept unchanged, or lowered as the final evaluation level of the base station.

2. The method for evaluating base station level according to claim 1, characterized in that, The initial assessment of the level of each base station to obtain the initial level of each base station includes: An initial assessment of the level of each base station is performed based on the total number of users carried by each base station within a first set period, thereby obtaining the initial level of each base station.

3. The method for evaluating base station level according to claim 2, characterized in that, The step of adjusting the initial level of each base station based on the total number of users carried by each base station to obtain the first level of each base station includes: The ratio of the uplink and downlink traffic of each base station to the total number of users carried within the first set period is determined as the first ratio. The ratio of the total number of target users carried by each base station to the total number of users carried within the first set period is determined as the second ratio; The initial level of each base station is adjusted according to the first ratio and the second ratio to obtain the first level of each base station.

4. The method for evaluating base station level according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of adjusting the first level of each base station based on the total number of complaints and outages to obtain the second level of each base station includes: Obtain the total number of complaints for each base station within a second predetermined period; The ratio of the number of complaints from target users of each base station to the total number of complaints within the second set period is determined as the third ratio; Determine the total number of times each base station's outage duration reaches a set duration within the second set period; The first level of each base station is adjusted based on the total number of complaints, the third ratio, and the total number of complaints to obtain the second level of each base station.

5. A method for evaluating base station level according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that, The method further includes: When multiple base stations experience fault alarms, the maintenance order of the multiple base stations that experienced fault alarms is determined according to the evaluation level.

6. A base station level evaluation device, characterized in that, include: The first unit is used to perform an initial assessment of the level of each base station to obtain the initial level of each base station; The second unit is used to adjust the initial level of each base station according to the total number of users carried by each base station, so as to obtain the first level of each base station; The third unit is used to adjust the first level of each base station based on the total number of complaints and outages of each base station, so as to obtain the second level of each base station. The fourth unit is used to adjust the second level of each base station according to the coverage area of ​​each base station and whether it is in a set time period, so as to obtain the third level of each base station; The fifth unit is used to adjust the third level of each base station according to whether each base station has backup power capability, so as to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station; The step of adjusting the second level of each base station based on its coverage area and whether it is within a set time period to obtain the third level of each base station includes: If a preset target location exists within the coverage area of ​​the base station, the corresponding second level is upgraded to obtain the final third level of the base station; If there is no preset target location within the coverage area of ​​the base station, the second level of each base station is adjusted according to whether the current time corresponds to the preset target time period in the historical round, so as to obtain the third level of each base station; The step of adjusting the third level of each base station based on whether each base station has backup power capability to obtain the final evaluation level of each base station includes: If the base station does not have backup power capability, the corresponding third level is upgraded to obtain the final evaluation level of the base station; If the base station has backup power capability, the third level of the base station is adjusted according to the maintenance difficulty coefficient and backup power duration defined in advance to obtain the final evaluation level of the base station. The maintenance difficulty coefficient is multiplied by the standardized backup power duration to obtain the multiplication result. The multiplication result is then compared with two pre-set thresholds. Based on the comparison result, the third level is raised, kept unchanged, or lowered as the final evaluation level of the base station.

7. An electronic device, characterized in that, Including the processor and memory; The memory is used to store programs; The processor executes the program to implement a base station level evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

8. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The storage medium stores a program that is executed by a processor to implement a base station level evaluation method as described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

Images