Missile simulation test method and system

Abstract

The present application relates to the field of missile simulation systems, and in particular to a missile simulation test method and system, the method comprising: when the command station determines that the main UAV and the slave UAV of the test group have entered the target area, the command station outputs an interference instruction to enable the interference device to output an interference signal to the first communication module; when the master UAV in the test group determines that the communication link of the first communication module is disconnected for a preset time, the command station outputs a switching instruction to the second communication module to enable the second communication module to start, and establishes communication with the relay group through the second communication module; the master UAV in the test group sends the situation information of the mission target to the relay group through the second communication module, so that the relay group shares the situation information with the main UAVs of each other test group; if the relay group determines that the other main UAVs have received the situation information of the mission target, the interference test is determined to be successful.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of missile simulation systems, and in particular to a missile simulation test method and system. Background Art

[0002] When attacking a target with missiles, it is generally carried out when multiple missiles are saturated. When multiple missiles arrive above the target area, any missile that finds an enemy target will share the location and number information of the enemy target with the remaining missiles. However, this process also faces enemy communication interference. Therefore, it is particularly important to test the communication capability of the missile in the face of interference. Therefore, it is particularly necessary to test the communication performance of the missile by conducting experiments in physical space.

[0003] During missile development, missile performance testing is typically performed in virtual models. However, actual missile use presents numerous challenges, such as weather and external communication interference. Therefore, simulations in virtual models are insufficient for effectively testing missile performance. Furthermore, using physical missiles for every communication test would result in high testing costs. Therefore, reducing the cost of missile communication capability testing is an urgent issue. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In order to reduce the cost of missile communication capability testing, the present application provides a missile simulation test method and system.

[0005] In a first aspect, the present application provides a missile simulation test method, which adopts the following technical solution:

[0006] A missile simulation test method includes an interference test step, wherein the interference test step includes:

[0007] The command station obtains the location information of each test unit and, upon determining that the master UAV and all slave UAVs of each test unit have entered the target area, outputs a jamming instruction to the jamming device so that the jamming device outputs a jamming signal to the first communication module. A test unit includes a master UAV and two slave UAVs, and the master UAV and the slave UAVs are both equipped with the first communication module and the second communication module.

[0008] When the master UAV in each test group determines that the communication link of the first communication module has been disconnected for a preset period of time, it outputs a switching instruction to the second communication module to activate the second communication module and establish communication with the relay group through the second communication module;

[0009] The master UAV in each test group transmits the situation information of the mission targets to the relay group via the second communication module, so that the relay group shares the situation information of the mission targets with the master UAVs of each of the other test groups. The relay group is configured to follow the test group and is at a preset distance from the test group. The situation information includes the number, location, and threat level of the mission targets.

[0010] The relay crew determines whether the master UAV of each of the remaining test crews has received the situation information of the mission target;

[0011] If the master UAVs of the remaining test groups all receive the situation information of the mission target, it is determined that the interference test is successful.

[0012] By adopting the above technical solution, the master UAV and the slave UAV in each test group are each simulated as an individual missile, and the jamming device transmits an interference signal to interfere with the first communication module of each UAV to simulate the real scenario of the missile being interfered with by the local signal in the local area. At the same time, a relay UAV is configured for the test group, and the master UAV in each test group can communicate with the relay UAV through the second communication module, thereby realizing information sharing between the master UAVs of each test group; if the relay group determines that the master UAVs of each of the remaining test groups have received the situation information of the mission target shared by the corresponding master UAV, it can be determined that the anti-interference test is successful; and since the cost of the UAV is lower than that of the real missile, and it can more highly simulate the scenario faced by the missile when actually attacking the target, and the UAV can be reused many times, the cost of the missile simulation test can be reduced.

[0013] In one possible implementation, a missile simulation test method further includes a coordinated strike step, which includes:

[0014] The master UAV of each test group determines firepower allocation information based on the situation information, and sends the firepower allocation information to the relay group through the second communication module, so that the relay group shares the firepower allocation information with the slave UAVs in the same test group;

[0015] The master drone and each slave drone in each test crew conduct simulated strikes on mission targets based on firepower allocation information.

[0016] In a possible implementation, before the interference test step, a main route step is further included, and the main route step includes:

[0017] The command and control station determines the navigation trajectory based on the target area where the mission target is located;

[0018] The command station controls the host and relay units in each test unit to take off simultaneously, wherein the host unit in each test unit first climbs to a first altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, each slave UAV in each test unit takes off and climbs to a second altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, wherein the first altitude is greater than the second altitude, and the relay unit climbs to a third altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, wherein the third altitude is less than the first altitude and greater than the second altitude;

[0019] The command station controls the relay unit to follow the test unit and fly along the navigation trajectory, and to keep a preset distance from the test unit.

[0020] In a possible implementation, after the main route step, a threat avoidance step is further included, and the threat avoidance step includes:

[0021] After the host of each test group enters the threat area, the master UAV performs threat target detection to determine threat information, including the number and location of threat targets;

[0022] The master UAV of each test group sends the threat information through the first communication module to achieve sharing with each slave UAV in the same group;

[0023] After receiving the threat information, each slave UAV generates an avoidance route based on the threat information and flies along the avoidance route;

[0024] After the master UAV of each test crew determines that the threat target has disappeared, it outputs a reunion command to each slave UAV in the same crew so that each slave UAV returns to its navigation track.

[0025] In a possible implementation, before the interference test step, a collaborative search step is further included, and the collaborative search step includes:

[0026] The main UAV of each test group determines a direction to enter the target area, and the directions of any two main UAVs entering the target area are different;

[0027] Each test crew's main UAV determines a search route, and the search routes of any two main UAVs do not overlap;

[0028] Each master UAV turns on the SAR radar detection equipment and conducts a collaborative search based on its corresponding search route to determine the situation information of the mission target.

[0029] In a second aspect, the present application provides a missile simulation test system, which adopts the following technical solutions:

[0030] A missile simulation test system, comprising: at least two test units, each test unit comprising a master UAV and two slave UAVs; and a relay unit comprising a master relay UAV and a backup relay UAV;

[0031] Each master drone and slave drone is configured to be equipped with a SAR radar detection device, a first communication module and a second communication module;

[0032] Also included is a jamming device, disposed in a target area and capable of emitting a jamming signal that interferes with the first communication module;

[0033] It also includes multiple command and control stations set up on the ground along the route, capable of communicating with the relay crew, each master drone, and jamming equipment;

[0034] The command station, the test unit, the relay unit and the jamming device can all execute a missile simulation test method as described in any one of the first aspects.

[0035] In summary, this application includes at least one of the following beneficial technical effects:

[0036] 1. The master UAV and slave UAV in each test group are each simulated as an individual missile. The jamming device transmits a jamming signal to interfere with the first communication module of each UAV to simulate the real scenario of a missile being interfered with by local signals in a local area. At the same time, a relay UAV is configured for the test group. The master UAV in each test group can communicate with the master UAVs in other test groups through the second communication module and the relay UAV, thereby realizing information sharing between the master UAVs of each test group. If the relay group determines that the master UAVs of each of the remaining test groups have received the situation information of the mission target shared by the corresponding master UAV, it can be determined that the anti-interference test is successful. Since the cost of UAVs is lower than that of real missiles, and they can more closely simulate the scenarios faced by missiles when actually attacking targets, and UAVs can be reused multiple times, the cost of missile simulation tests can be reduced. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0037] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the configuration of the missile simulation test system in the embodiment of the present application;

[0038] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of the main UAV in the test unit in the embodiment of the present application;

[0039] Figure 3 1 is a flowchart of a missile simulation test in an embodiment of the present application;

[0040] Figure 41 is a flow chart of the interference test steps in the embodiment of the present application;

[0041] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the formation of each test drone group in the embodiment of the present application;

[0042] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the search path of a master drone in a target area in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0043] The following is combined with Figure 1 -Attached Figure 6 This application is described in further detail.

[0044] After reading this specification, those skilled in the art may make non-creative modifications to this embodiment as needed, but such modifications are protected by patent law as long as they fall within the scope of the claims of this application.

[0045] To make the purpose, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of this application more clear, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of this application. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of this application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0046] In this document, the term "and / or" simply describes a relationship between related objects, indicating that three possible relationships exist. For example, "A and / or B" can represent: A exists alone, A and B exist simultaneously, or B exists alone. Furthermore, the character " / " in this document, unless otherwise specified, generally indicates an "or" relationship between the related objects.

[0047] The present application embodiment provides a missile simulation test system, referring to Figure 1 The system includes: at least two test groups, each test group includes a master UAV and two slave UAVs to simulate the scenario of a main missile and two clusters of missiles working together during a real missile strike; the system also includes a relay group, which includes a master relay UAV and a backup relay UAV; it also includes jamming equipment, which is set in the target area and can emit jamming signals to interfere with the first communication module; it also includes multiple command and control stations, which are set on the ground along the route and can communicate with the relay group, each master UAV and the jamming equipment.

[0048] Inflatable targets are used in the target area to simulate the characteristics of the mission objective. These targets are deployed on mobile wheeled vehicles. Their location and type can be set before the mission begins, and the target type can be changed by selecting the inflatable object. Each command station forms a self-organizing network to communicate with each other, allowing for information sharing. Each command station is equipped with a display screen that displays real-time parameters such as the flight path of each test group and the drones within it.

[0049] Reference Figure 2 , each master drone is configured to be equipped with SAR radar detection equipment, a first communication module and a second communication module; in an embodiment of the present application, the first communication module is a radio communication module, such as a polarized antenna, and the second communication module is an optical communication module and a laser and a transmitting / receiving optical path are provided to realize optical communication. Each relay drone in the relay unit is equipped with an optical communication module that matches the second module, so that each relay drone can communicate with the drone equipped with the second communication module. Each slave drone is equipped with a first communication module and a second communication module, but the slave drone is not equipped with a SAR radar detection device. Furthermore, each master drone and slave drone is also equipped with various types of sensors to detect relevant parameters of the drone, such as an IMU sensor.

[0050] In practice, due to the missile's structural design and the placement of the communication modules, direct communication between the missiles is impossible. Furthermore, the first and second communication modules installed on the master and slave drones in each test unit are both backward-facing transceiver modules. This means that the master and slave drones can only communicate with the command and control station via the first communication module, and / or can only communicate with the relay unit via the second communication module. Direct communication between the master and slave drones is impossible.

[0051] The present application embodiment provides a missile simulation test method, referring to Figure 3 ,The test method includes the main route step, threat avoidance step, collaborative search step, interference ,test step and collaborative attack step which are executed sequentially.

[0052] The interference test step includes steps S41 to S44. Figure 4 Shown:

[0053] Step S41: The command station obtains the location information of each test group, and when it is determined that the master drone and all slave drones of each test group have entered the target area, it outputs an interference instruction to the interference device so that the interference device outputs an interference signal to the first communication module. A test group includes a master drone and two slave drones, and the master drone and the slave drones are both equipped with a first communication module and a second communication module.

[0054] For the embodiment of the present application, before the first communication module is interfered with by the signal of the jamming device, the communication between the master drone and the slave drone, as well as the communication between the master drone and the command station, all adopt the radio communication method of the first communication module. The position information of the master drone and the slave drone of the test group can be obtained by the command station through the first communication module. The target area is the area where the mission target is placed on the ground, and the jamming device capable of emitting jamming signals is also set in the target area. After determining that all drones of all test groups have entered the target area, the command station outputs a jamming command to the jamming device, and the jamming device receives the jamming command and emits a jamming signal, so as to simulate the scenario in which the communication capability of the missile is interfered with between the master drones of each test group.

[0055] Step S42: When the master UAV in each test group determines that the communication link of the first communication module has been disconnected for a preset time, it outputs a switching instruction to the second communication module to start the second communication module and establishes communication with the relay group through the second communication module.

[0056] In the embodiment of the present application, for the main UAV in each test group, when the communication link of the first module of any main UAV is disconnected continuously for more than 1 second and the cumulative disconnection exceeds 3 seconds, the second communication module of the main UAV is started and establishes an optical communication link with the main relay UAV in the relay group. The relay group is located at a preset distance behind the test group, and the forward irradiation range of the optical communication module of the main relay UAV of the relay group is a ±30° cone angle to achieve communication coverage of each test group. The irradiation range of the optical communication module of the main relay UAV is determined by the distance and orientation of a UAV in the test group that is closest to the main relay UAV.

[0057] Step S43: The master UAV in each test group transmits the situation information of the mission targets to the relay group via the second communication module, so that the relay group shares the situation information of the mission targets with the master UAVs of each other test group. The relay group is configured to follow the test group and maintain a preset distance from the test group. The situation information includes the number, location, and threat level of the mission targets.

[0058] Step S44: The relay unit determines whether the master UAV of each of the remaining test units has received the situation information of the mission target; if the master UAV of each of the remaining test units has received the situation information of the mission target, it is determined that the interference test is successful.

[0059] In this embodiment of the present application, after receiving situation information from any master drone, the master-relay drone transmits this situation information via an optical communication module to each slave drone within the same test group as the master drone to achieve information sharing. After receiving the situation information from the master-relay drone, each master drone will feedback a successful reception instruction to the master relay drone. The master relay drone determines whether the test is successful based on whether it has received the feedback successful reception instruction. If the master relay drone receives the successful reception instruction feedback from each of the other master drones in the test group, the interference test is determined to be successful.

[0060] Specifically, the embodiments of the present application are explained using three test groups A, B and C as examples: if the main drone in test group A obtains the situation information of the mission target through detection, the main drone of test group A sends the situation information to the test group through the second communication module, the test group identifies the identity of the main drone in test group A to confirm its identity, and sends the situation information to the main drones of test groups B and C, thereby realizing information sharing among the main drones in the three test groups.

[0061] The master UAV and slave UAV in each test group are each simulated as an individual missile, and the jamming device transmits an interference signal to interfere with the first communication module of each UAV to simulate the real scenario of the missile being interfered with by the local signal in the local area. At the same time, a relay UAV is configured for the test group, and the master UAV in each test group can communicate with the relay UAV through the second communication module, thereby realizing information sharing between the master UAVs of each test group; if the relay group determines that the master UAV of each of the remaining test groups has received the situation information of the mission target shared by the corresponding master UAV, it can be determined that the anti-interference test is successful; and since the cost of UAVs is lower than that of real missiles, and they can more highly simulate the scenarios faced by missiles when actually attacking targets, and UAVs can be reused many times, the cost of missile simulation tests can be reduced.

[0062] Furthermore, the main route step may specifically include: the command station determines the navigation trajectory based on the target area where the mission target is located; the command station controls the main unit and the relay unit in each test unit to take off at the same time, wherein the main unit in each test unit first climbs to a first altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, and each slave drone in each test unit takes off and climbs to a second altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, wherein the first altitude is greater than the second altitude, and the relay unit climbs to a third altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, and the third altitude is less than the first altitude and greater than the second altitude; the command station controls the relay unit to follow up along the navigation trajectory after entering the test unit, and is at a preset distance from the test unit.

[0063] Specifically, in this embodiment of the present application, the test fleet is divided into three groups, A, B, and C, with Group D serving as a relay. During the main flight path, the four groups, A, B, C, and D, simultaneously initiate the takeoff process from four takeoff points. The four groups take off in a consistent sequence, meaning the master drone within each test fleet takes off at the same time. Furthermore, each test fleet and relay fleet also has a corresponding backup group: a master and slave drones operating as ground backup. If any test fleet / relay fleet drone experiences an anomaly during takeoff, the backup drone will be substituted.

[0064] like Figure 5 As shown, the main drone in each test group took off first and climbed to an altitude of 4,000 meters. The relay drone took off and climbed to an altitude of 3,000 meters. Slave drone 1 in any test group took off and climbed when the main drone reached 4,000 meters, climbing to a predetermined altitude of 2,100 meters to begin cruising. Slave drone 2 took off three minutes after slave drone 1 and climbed to a predetermined altitude of 2,000 meters to begin cruising. The main drone in each test group cruised at an altitude of 4,000 meters, using its SAR radar to sense its surroundings. The three test groups A, B, and C formed a formation with Group A leading, followed by Groups B and C, with Groups B and C symmetrically aligned with respect to Group A along their trajectory.

[0065] Furthermore, after the main route step is the threat avoidance step, which may specifically include: after the host of each test group enters the threat area, the main UAV performs threat target detection to determine the threat information, and the threat information includes the number and location of the threat targets; the main UAV of each test group sends the threat information through the first communication module to achieve sharing with each slave UAV in the same group; after receiving the threat information, each slave UAV generates an avoidance route based on the threat information and flies along the avoidance route; after the main UAV of each test group determines that the threat target has disappeared, it outputs a reunion instruction to each slave UAV in the same group so that each slave UAV returns to the navigation track.

[0066] Specifically, the threat avoidance phase primarily involves the master drone in each test group detecting and reporting threats, and the slave drones avoiding them. The master drone cruises at a fixed altitude and does not perform threat avoidance.

[0067] Each test unit's master drone detected a threat during patrol. Using SAR radar equipment from an altitude of 4,000 meters, it detected and identified the ground threat target and threat area. It then communicated with slave drones 1 and 2, patrolling at an altitude of 2,000 meters, via the first communication module, sharing this threat information. After receiving the threat information from the master drone, each slave drone independently planned an evasive flight path based on its own intelligent computing payload. Once the autonomously planned evasive flight path was complete and the threat zone was confirmed to be clear, both drones returned to their original patrol trajectory.

[0068] Furthermore, a missile simulation test method also includes a collaborative search step, which is executed after the threat avoidance step and before the interference test step; the collaborative search step may specifically include: the main UAV of each test group determines a direction to enter the target area, and the directions of any two main UAVs entering the target area are different; the main UAVs of each test group each determine a search route, and the search routes of any two main UAVs do not overlap; each main UAV turns on the SAR radar detection equipment and collaboratively searches based on its corresponding search route to determine the situation information of the mission target.

[0069] Specifically, each master drone in each test group will select a direction to enter the target area and conduct radar detection of the target area. The three groups of master drones can search the target area independently, or they can coordinate a simultaneous search of the same area. After entering the target area, the master drone will activate its SAR radar detection equipment to search for ground targets. To conduct a comprehensive search of the target area, a coordinated search is required over the area.

[0070] Each master drone extracts and marks the target longitude and latitude obtained through detection and solution. After the three groups of master drones search the target area and find the target, they conduct a situation assessment on the target to determine the target location, quantity, threat level of the mission target and generate situation information of the mission target. Among them, the path trajectory of each master drone for search can be the same, such as searching according to a circular path or a triangular path; of course, the search path corresponding to each master drone can also be different, which is not specifically limited in the embodiments of this application.

[0071] like Figure 6Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the search path used by the master UAV within a test crew. Each test crew's master UAV enters the search path from point 1, flies along waypoints (2, 3, 4, and 5), and then continues toward point 1 after reaching point 5. The single-circling flight path is approximately 17 kilometers long. If the mission target is discovered during the circling process, situational information is shared with the master UAVs in the remaining test crews.

[0072] Furthermore, after the interference test, a coordinated strike step is also included, which may specifically include: the main UAV of each test group determines the firepower allocation information based on the situation information, and sends the firepower allocation information to the relay group through the second communication module, so that the relay group shares the firepower allocation information with the slave UAVs in the same test group; the main UAV and each slave UAV in each test group simulate strikes on the mission target based on the firepower allocation information.

[0073] Specifically, the coordinated strike process can be divided into three phases: firepower allocation, tacit coordination, and target strike. The firepower allocation phase is primarily performed by the master drone in each test unit. After acquiring the target's situational information, the master drone determines firepower allocation information based on this situational information, including determining the master drone's own firepower allocation and the corresponding firepower allocation for each slave drone. The firepower allocation information includes the target location and number of targets. For example, if there are four mission targets, namely A, B, C, and D, the master drone strikes targets A and B, slave drone 1 strikes target C, and slave drone 2 strikes target D.

[0074] After the interference test step, information sharing between the master and slave drones in the same test group is achieved through the relay group. The tacit coordination stage includes the master drone sending the firepower allocation information to the relay through the second communication module, so that the relay group shares the firepower allocation information with the slave drones in the same test group, and each slave drone receives the corresponding firepower allocation information. The target strike stage mainly refers to the situation alignment of the master and slave drones of each test group through the optical communication data link. The three groups of master drones will respectively send the target information obtained after alignment to slave drones 1 and 2 in their respective groups. The master and slave drones of each test group will fly towards the target area and simulate a strike on the target.

[0075] Furthermore, the master UAV and slave UAV of each test group and each relay UAV of the relay group return based on the set return route, and the test ends.

[0076] The above are only some of the implementation methods of the present application. It should be pointed out that for ordinary technicians in this technical field, several improvements and modifications can be made without departing from the principles of the present application. These improvements and modifications should also be regarded as the scope of protection of the present application.

Claims

1. A missile simulation test method, characterized in that: The method comprises an interference test step, wherein the interference test step comprises: The command station obtains the location information of each test unit and, upon determining that the master UAV and all slave UAVs of each test unit have entered the target area, outputs a jamming instruction to the jamming device so that the jamming device outputs a jamming signal to the first communication module. A test unit includes a master UAV and two slave UAVs, and the master UAV and the slave UAVs are both equipped with the first communication module and the second communication module. When the master UAV in each test group determines that the communication link of the first communication module has been disconnected for a preset period of time, it outputs a switching instruction to the second communication module to activate the second communication module and establish communication with the relay group through the second communication module; The master UAV in each test group transmits the situation information of the mission targets to the relay group via the second communication module, so that the relay group shares the situation information of the mission targets with the master UAVs of each of the other test groups. The relay group is configured to follow the test group and is at a preset distance from the test group. The situation information includes the number, location, and threat level of the mission targets. The relay crew determines whether the master UAV of each of the remaining test crews has received the situation information of the mission target; If the master UAVs of the remaining test groups receive the situation information of the mission target, the interference test is determined to be successful; The coordinated attack step is also included, and the coordinated attack step includes: The master UAV of each test group determines firepower allocation information based on the situation information, and sends the firepower allocation information to the relay group through the second communication module, so that the relay group shares the firepower allocation information with the slave UAVs in the same test group; The master drone and each slave drone in each test crew conduct simulated strikes on mission targets based on firepower allocation information.

2. A missile simulation test method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Before the interference test step, a main route step is also included, and the main route step includes: The command and control station determines the navigation trajectory based on the target area where the mission target is located; The command station controls the host and relay units in each test unit to take off simultaneously, wherein the host unit in each test unit first climbs to a first altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, each slave UAV in each test unit takes off and climbs to a second altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, wherein the first altitude is greater than the second altitude, and the relay unit climbs to a third altitude and cruises along the navigation trajectory, wherein the third altitude is less than the first altitude and greater than the second altitude; The command station controls the relay unit to follow the test unit and fly along the navigation trajectory, and to keep a preset distance from the test unit.

3. A missile simulation test method according to claim 2, characterized in that: After the main route step, a threat avoidance step is also included, and the threat avoidance step includes: After the host of each test group enters the threat area, the master UAV performs threat target detection to determine threat information, including the number and location of threat targets; The master UAV of each test group sends the threat information through the first communication module to achieve sharing with each slave UAV in the same group; After receiving the threat information, each slave UAV generates an avoidance route based on the threat information and flies along the avoidance route; After the master UAV of each test crew determines that the threat target has disappeared, it outputs a reunion command to each slave UAV in the same crew so that each slave UAV returns to the navigation track.

4. A missile simulation test method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Before the interference test step, a collaborative search step is also included, and the collaborative search step includes: The main UAV of each test group determines a direction to enter the target area, and the directions of any two main UAVs entering the target area are different; Each test crew's main UAV determines its own search route, and the search routes of any two main UAVs do not overlap; Each master UAV turns on the SAR radar detection equipment and conducts a collaborative search based on its corresponding search route to determine the situation information of the mission target.

5. A missile simulation test system, characterized in that: The system includes: at least two test units, each test unit includes a master drone and two slave drones, and also includes a relay unit, the relay unit includes a master relay drone and a backup relay drone; Each of the master drone and the slave drone is configured to be equipped with a SAR radar detection device, a first communication module and a second communication module; Also included is a jamming device, disposed in a target area and capable of emitting a jamming signal that interferes with the first communication module; It also includes multiple command and control stations set up on the ground along the route, which can communicate with the relay group, each main drone and jamming equipment. Wherein, the command station, the test unit, the relay unit and the jamming device can all execute a missile simulation test method as described in any one of claims 1-4.

Images