Dynamic evaluation method, device, electronic equipment and medium for hydraulic support quality

Abstract

The present application proposes a method, device, electronic equipment and medium for dynamic assessment of the support quality of a hydraulic support, the method comprising: constructing a dynamic assessment index system for the support quality of a hydraulic support based on various monitoring indicators of the hydraulic support; obtaining the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at at least one moment and determining the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value; for any monitoring indicator, respectively determining the positive and negative ideal points corresponding to the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value; for any moment, determining the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at that moment based on the difference between the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value of each monitoring indicator at that moment and the corresponding positive and negative ideal points; determining the dynamic assessment result of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value at at least one moment. The present application can realize the real-time online dynamic assessment of the support quality of the hydraulic support, and provide a reference basis for the adjustment of the support parameters of the hydraulic support in a timely manner.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of coal mine equipment status monitoring and data processing, and in particular to a method, device, electronic equipment and medium for dynamic assessment of hydraulic support quality. Background Art

[0002] The hydraulic support is in direct contact with the surrounding rock of the working face and bears the huge mining pressure brought by the movement of rock strata. It is an important support structure group for supporting the roof of the comprehensive mining working face, protecting the coal wall, and isolating the goaf from waste rock.

[0003] The related technology generally collects data such as column pressure and posture of the hydraulic support, and performs offline analysis based on the collected data to evaluate the support quality of the hydraulic support. However, this method cannot evaluate the support quality of the hydraulic support in a timely manner, has poor real-time performance, and cannot provide a basis for dynamically adjusting the support parameters of the support; in addition, the evaluation accuracy of this method needs to be improved. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present application aims to solve one of the technical problems in the related art at least to some extent.

[0005] To this end, the first purpose of this application is to propose a method for dynamically evaluating the support quality of hydraulic supports.

[0006] The second purpose of this application is to provide a dynamic assessment device for the support quality of a hydraulic support.

[0007] The third objective of the present application is to provide an electronic device.

[0008] A fourth objective of the present application is to provide a computer-readable storage medium.

[0009] A fifth object of the present application is to provide a computer program product.

[0010] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the first embodiment of the present application proposes a method for dynamically evaluating the support quality of a hydraulic support, comprising:

[0011] Based on the monitoring indicators of hydraulic supports, a dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports is established;

[0012] Obtaining the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at at least one time, and determining the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value;

[0013] For any of the monitoring indicators in the dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of the hydraulic support, determine the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and determine the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator;

[0014] For any moment, based on the difference between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of the hydraulic support at the moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point and first negative ideal point, and the difference between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of the hydraulic support at the moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point and second negative ideal point, determine the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment;

[0015] Based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment, a dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support is determined.

[0016] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the second embodiment of the present application proposes a hydraulic support support quality dynamic assessment device, comprising:

[0017] A construction module is used to construct a dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports based on various monitoring indicators of hydraulic supports;

[0018] An acquisition module is used to acquire the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at at least one time, and to determine the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value;

[0019] A first determination module is used to determine, for any of the monitoring indicators in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system, a first positive ideal point and a first negative ideal point corresponding to a positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and a second positive ideal point and a second negative ideal point corresponding to a negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator;

[0020] The second determination module is used to determine the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at any moment based on the difference between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at the moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point and first negative ideal point, and the difference between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at the moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point and second negative ideal point;

[0021] An evaluation module is used to determine a dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment.

[0022] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the third aspect of the embodiment of the present application proposes an electronic device, including: a processor, and a memory connected to the processor for communication; the memory stores computer execution instructions; the processor executes the computer execution instructions stored in the memory to implement a dynamic assessment method for the support quality of a hydraulic support as described in the first aspect of the embodiment of the present application.

[0023] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the fourth aspect of the embodiment of the present application proposes a computer-readable storage medium, in which computer execution instructions are stored. When the computer execution instructions are executed by the processor, they are used to implement a dynamic assessment method for the support quality of a hydraulic support as described in the first aspect of the embodiment of the present application.

[0024] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the fifth aspect of the present application proposes a computer program product, including a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements a dynamic assessment method for the support quality of a hydraulic support as described in the first aspect of the embodiment of the present application.

[0025] The technical solution provided by this application brings at least the following beneficial effects:

[0026] A dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports is constructed based on various monitoring indicators of hydraulic supports; real-time monitoring values ​​of various monitoring indicators in the dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports are obtained at at least one moment, and the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value are determined; for any monitoring indicator, the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator are determined, and the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator are determined; for any moment, based on the difference between the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point and first negative ideal point, and the difference between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point and second negative ideal point, determine the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment; based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment, the dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support is determined. Based on the real-time monitoring values ​​of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality, the real-time online dynamic evaluation of the hydraulic support support quality can be realized, which has good real-time performance and can provide a reference basis for the adjustment of hydraulic support support parameters in a timely manner. In addition, based on the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value, the support quality of the hydraulic support is evaluated from both positive and negative aspects, which improves the accuracy of the support quality evaluation results.

[0027] Additional aspects and advantages of the present application will be given in part in the description below, and in part will become apparent from the description below, or will be learned through the practice of the present application. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0028] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of the present application will become apparent and easily understood from the following description of the embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0029] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of a flow chart of a method for dynamically evaluating the support quality of a hydraulic support provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0030] Figure 2 A schematic flow chart of a method for dynamically evaluating the support quality of a hydraulic support provided in another embodiment of the present application;

[0031] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the structure of a hydraulic support support quality dynamic assessment device provided in one embodiment of the present application;

[0032] Figure 4 It is a block diagram of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0033] Embodiments of the present application are described in detail below, and examples of the embodiments are shown in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals throughout represent the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and are intended to be used to explain the present application, and should not be construed as limiting the present application.

[0034] The following describes the method, device, electronic equipment and medium for dynamically evaluating the support quality of a hydraulic support according to an embodiment of the present application with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0035] Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a method for dynamically evaluating the support quality of a hydraulic support provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0036] like Figure 1 As shown, the dynamic assessment method for the hydraulic support quality includes the following steps:

[0037] Step 101, constructing a dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports based on various monitoring indicators of the hydraulic supports.

[0038] In order to ensure the timeliness of the support quality assessment, the monitoring index can refer to a variable that can obtain the index data in real time. In an optional embodiment, the monitoring index includes but is not limited to the pressure u1 of a single column of the hydraulic support, the pressure difference u2 of the hydraulic support column, the maximum downward shrinkage of a single column of the hydraulic support u3, the extension difference u4 of the hydraulic support column, the roll angle u5 of the hydraulic support top beam, the pitch angle u6 of the hydraulic support top beam, the roll angle u7 of the hydraulic support base, the pitch angle u8 of the hydraulic support base, the inclination angle u9 of the hydraulic support shield beam, the combined force u10 of the hydraulic support top beam, the action point u11 of the combined force of the hydraulic support top beam, the height u12 of the hydraulic support, the pressure u13 of the hydraulic support guard plate, the pressure u14 of the hydraulic support balance jack, and the opening state u15 of the hydraulic support safety valve. The above-mentioned monitoring indicators form a dynamic evaluation index system for the quality of hydraulic support support U={u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8, u9, u10, u11, u12, u13, u14, u15}.

[0039] Step 102, obtaining the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring index in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at at least one time, and determining the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value.

[0040] The real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator at at least one moment refers to the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator at one moment or the real-time monitoring value at multiple moments. When at least one moment refers to multiple moments, the sampling period between two adjacent moments may be the same. As an example and not a limitation, the sampling period may be one minute.

[0041] For any monitoring indicator, the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator respectively refer to the degree of satisfaction and dissatisfaction of the real-time monitoring value with respect to a certain property represented by the monitoring indicator (such as stability, safety, bearing capacity, etc.); among which, the degree of satisfaction indicates the degree to which the hydraulic support performs well in this property, and the degree of dissatisfaction indicates the degree to which the hydraulic support performs poorly in this property.

[0042] As an example, the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value may be determined by a bipolar fuzzy analysis method.

[0043] Among them, the positive electrode evaluation value and the negative electrode evaluation value corresponding to each real-time monitoring value constitute a bipolar evaluation set.

[0044] The positive evaluation values ​​and negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of each monitoring indicator at each moment constitute the bipolar fuzzy evaluation matrix R of the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality. As an example, a row in the bipolar fuzzy evaluation matrix R is a bipolar evaluation set corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of each monitoring indicator at a certain moment, and a column is a bipolar evaluation set corresponding to the real-time monitoring value of a monitoring indicator at each moment.

[0045] Taking the above 15 monitoring indicators as an example, the bipolar fuzzy evaluation matrix R is as follows:

[0046] R=

[0047]

[0048] in, Corresponding to the first Column, indicating the The monitoring indicators are The set of bipolar evaluation sets corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​at each moment, .

[0049]

[0050]

[0051] in, Indicates a moment, , Indicates The next moment The bipolar evaluation set corresponding to the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator is ( ), Indicates The next moment The positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, Indicates The next moment The negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of a monitoring indicator.

[0052] Step 103, for any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality, determine the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and determine the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator.

[0053] The first positive ideal point refers to the positive ideal point of the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, representing the optimal state value of the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value; the first negative ideal point refers to the negative ideal point of the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, representing the worst state value of the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value.

[0054] The second positive ideal point refers to the positive ideal point of the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, representing the optimal state value of the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value; the second negative ideal point refers to the negative ideal point of the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, representing the worst state value of the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value.

[0055] As an example, when obtaining real-time monitoring values ​​of various monitoring indicators of the hydraulic support at one or more moments, for any monitoring indicator, a predetermined first positive ideal point, a first negative ideal point, a second positive ideal point and a second negative ideal point can be obtained.

[0056] Step 104, for any moment, based on the difference between the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at that moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point and first negative ideal point, as well as the difference between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at that moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point and second negative ideal point, determine the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at that moment.

[0057] For the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator at any moment, the difference between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value and the corresponding first positive ideal point, as well as the difference between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value and the second positive ideal point, respectively intuitively reflect the degree to which the positive pole evaluation value and the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value deviate from the optimal state; the difference between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value and the corresponding first negative ideal point, as well as the difference between the negative pole evaluation value and the second negative ideal point, respectively intuitively reflect the degree to which the positive pole evaluation value and the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value deviate from the worst state.

[0058] Therefore, based on the difference between the positive evaluation value and the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point, as well as the difference between the negative evaluation value and the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point, the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support determined can accurately and objectively reflect the deviation between the support quality of the hydraulic support and the expected optimal support state and the worst support state.

[0059] Step 105: Determine a dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment.

[0060] When evaluating the support quality of the hydraulic support, for each moment, it can be determined whether the support quality deviation value at that moment is greater than the reference deviation value. If the support quality deviation value at that moment is greater than the reference deviation value, it means that the support quality of the hydraulic support at that moment is good; if the support quality deviation value at that moment is less than or equal to the reference deviation value, it means that the support quality of the hydraulic support at that moment is poor. Among them, the reference deviation value is the support quality deviation value threshold, which is used to evaluate the support quality of the hydraulic support and determine the dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support.

[0061] The reference deviation value has a direct impact on the accuracy of the dynamic evaluation results. The following is an explanation of how to determine the reference deviation value:

[0062] As an example, when obtaining the real-time monitoring values ​​of various monitoring indicators of the hydraulic support at a moment, a predetermined reference deviation value may be obtained.

[0063] As another example, when obtaining real-time monitoring values ​​of various monitoring indicators of the hydraulic support at multiple times, a reference deviation value can be determined based on the support quality deviation values ​​at multiple times. For example, the average of the support quality deviation values ​​at multiple times is used as the reference deviation value.

[0064] In this embodiment, a dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of a hydraulic support is constructed based on each monitoring index of the hydraulic support; the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring index in the dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of the hydraulic support is obtained at at least one moment, and the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value are determined; for any monitoring index, the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring index are determined, and the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring index are determined; for any moment, based on the difference between the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring index at the moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point and first negative ideal point, and the difference between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring index at the moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point and second negative ideal point, the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment is determined; based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment, the dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support is determined. Based on the real-time monitoring values ​​of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality, the real-time online dynamic evaluation of the hydraulic support support quality can be realized, which has good real-time performance and can provide a reference basis for the adjustment of hydraulic support support parameters in a timely manner. In addition, based on the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value, the support quality of the hydraulic support is evaluated from both positive and negative aspects, which improves the accuracy of the support quality evaluation results.

[0065] This embodiment provides another method for dynamically evaluating the support quality of hydraulic supports. Figure 2 A schematic flow chart of a method for dynamically evaluating the support quality of a hydraulic support provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0066] like Figure 2 As shown, the method for dynamic assessment of hydraulic support quality may include the following steps:

[0067] Step 201, constructing a dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports based on various monitoring indicators of the hydraulic supports.

[0068] Step 202: obtaining the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring index in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at at least one moment.

[0069] Step 203, for the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation indicator system at any time, determine whether the real-time monitoring value is within the corresponding normal monitoring value range.

[0070] The normal monitoring value interval can be predetermined; if the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator is within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, it means that the real-time monitoring value is a normal value; if the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator is not within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, it means that the real-time monitoring value is an abnormal value.

[0071] As an example but not a limitation, the normal monitoring value ranges corresponding to each monitoring indicator are as follows:

[0072] The normal monitoring value range of the pressure u1 of a single column of the hydraulic support is [initial support force value, end-of-cycle resistance value], which can generally be [18MPa, 38.5MPa]; the normal monitoring value range of the pressure difference u2 of the hydraulic support column is [0, 5MPa]; the normal monitoring value range of the maximum downward contraction u3 of a single column of the hydraulic support is [0, 50cm]; the normal monitoring value range of the expansion and contraction difference u4 of the hydraulic support column is [0, 20cm]; the normal monitoring value range of the roll angle u5 of the hydraulic support top beam is [-10°, 10°]; the normal monitoring value range of the pitch angle u6 of the hydraulic support top beam is [0, 10°]; the normal monitoring value range of the roll angle u7 of the hydraulic support base is [-10°, 10°]; the pitch angle u8 of the hydraulic support base is [0, 10°] The normal monitoring value interval of the inclination angle u8 is [0, 10°]; the normal monitoring value interval of the inclination angle u9 of the hydraulic support shield beam is [30°, 50°]; the normal monitoring value interval of the hydraulic support top beam resultant force u10 is [400MPa, 500MPa]; the normal monitoring value interval of the hydraulic support top beam resultant force action point u11 is [-20cm, 20cm]; the normal monitoring value interval of the hydraulic support height u12 is [the lowest value of the support column, the maximum mining height of the working face]; the normal monitoring value interval of the hydraulic support guard plate pressure u13 is [0, 20MPa]; the normal monitoring value interval of the hydraulic support balance jack pressure u14 is [0, 20MPa]; the normal value of the hydraulic support safety valve opening state u15 is 0.

[0073] Step 204, in response to the real-time monitoring value being within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, the real-time monitoring value is standardized based on the set first non-negative interval to obtain a positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at any time; based on the set first non-positive interval, a random value is selected to obtain a negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at any time.

[0074] In the case where the real-time monitoring value is within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, in order to make the positive evaluation value play a leading role, the right endpoint value of the first non-negative interval is greater than the absolute value of the left endpoint value of the first non-positive interval.

[0075] As a possible implementation, the first non-negative interval is [0, 1], and the first non-positive interval is [-0.5, 0]. As another possible implementation, the first non-negative interval is [0, 1], and the first non-positive interval is [-0.4, 0].

[0076] As an example, the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator can be standardized by the following formula:

[0077]

[0078] in, is the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator. is the maximum value in the normal monitoring value interval corresponding to the monitoring indicator, is the minimum value in the normal monitoring value interval corresponding to the monitoring indicator, It is the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator.

[0079] As an example, a random number selection algorithm may be used to select a random value from the first non-positive interval as the negative pole evaluation value.

[0080] Step 205, in response to the real-time monitoring value not being within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, a random value is selected based on a set second non-negative interval to obtain a positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support quality at any time; based on the set second non-positive interval, the real-time monitoring value is standardized to obtain a negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support quality at any time.

[0081] Among them, the right endpoint value of the first non-negative interval is greater than the right endpoint value of the second non-negative interval, and the left endpoint value of the first non-positive interval is greater than the left endpoint value of the second non-positive interval.

[0082] When the real-time monitoring value is not within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, in order to make the negative evaluation value play a dominant role and avoid completely negative evaluation, the right endpoint value of the first non-negative interval is smaller than the absolute value of the left endpoint value of the first non-positive interval.

[0083] As a possible implementation, the second non-negative interval is [0, 0.5], and the second non-positive interval is [-1, 0]. As another possible implementation, the second non-negative interval is [0, 0.4], and the second non-positive interval is [-1, 0].

[0084] Regardless of whether the real-time monitoring value is a normal value or an abnormal value, this application quantitatively evaluates the real-time monitoring value based on non-negative intervals and non-positive intervals.

[0085] The contents of random value selection and standardization of real-time monitoring values ​​in this step can refer to the relevant description in the aforementioned step 204.

[0086] It should be noted that, for monitoring indicators u1-u14, the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator can be determined based on step 204 or step 205; for monitoring indicator u15, its real-time monitoring value is a switch state. When the real-time monitoring value is 0, it means that the hydraulic support safety valve is not open. At this time, it can be determined that the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value is 1, and the negative evaluation value is 0; when the monitoring value is 1, it means that the hydraulic support safety valve is open. At this time, it can be determined that the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value is 0, and the negative evaluation value is -1.

[0087] Step 206, for any monitoring indicator, determine the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and determine the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator.

[0088] As an example, when obtaining the real-time monitoring values ​​of various monitoring indicators of the hydraulic support at multiple times, for any monitoring indicator, the maximum positive evaluation value is selected from the positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicator at multiple times as the first positive ideal point for the dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support; the minimum positive evaluation value is selected from the positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicator at multiple times as the first negative ideal point for the dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support; the maximum negative evaluation value is selected from the negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicator at multiple times as the second positive ideal point for the dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support; the minimum negative evaluation value is selected from the negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicator at multiple times as the second negative ideal point for the dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support.

[0089] As an example, combining the following formula, The process of obtaining the first positive ideal point, the first negative ideal point, the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to each monitoring indicator is described as follows:

[0090]

[0091]

[0092]

[0093] Indicates The positive ideal point set corresponding to the monitoring index includes the first positive ideal point and the second positive ideal point ; Indicates that from The monitoring indicators are Among the positive electrode evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​at each moment, the maximum positive electrode evaluation value is selected as the The first positive ideal point corresponding to the monitoring index ; Indicates that from The monitoring indicators are Among the negative electrode evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​at each moment, the maximum negative electrode evaluation value is selected as the The second positive ideal point corresponding to the monitoring index .

[0094] Indicates The set of negative ideal points corresponding to the monitoring indicators includes the first negative ideal point and the second negative ideal point ; Indicates that from The monitoring indicators are Among the positive electrode evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​at each moment, the minimum positive electrode evaluation value is selected as the first The first negative ideal point corresponding to the monitoring index , Indicates that from The monitoring indicators are Among the negative electrode evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​at each moment, the minimum negative electrode evaluation value is selected as the The second negative ideal point corresponding to the monitoring index .

[0095] Step 207, for any moment, based on the distance between the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support quality at that moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point, and the distance between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support quality at that moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point, determine the first distance.

[0096] As an example, the first distance is determined based on the absolute value of the distance between the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support quality and the corresponding first positive ideal point, and the absolute value of the distance between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support quality and the corresponding second positive ideal point.

[0097] Among them, the first distance is determined based on the absolute value of the distance between the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at this moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point, and the absolute value of the distance between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at this moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point, including: for any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system, based on the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator at this moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point, and the absolute value of the distance between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator at this moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point, determine the average of the absolute values ​​of the first distances; determine the first distance based on the average of the absolute values ​​of the first distances corresponding to each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system.

[0098] As an example and not a limitation, the first distance may be determined by the following formula:

[0099]

[0100] Indicates The first distance at this moment, Indicates The next moment The positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring index , and the corresponding first positive ideal point The distance between Indicates The next moment Negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring index , and the corresponding second positive ideal point The distance between Indicates taking the absolute value.

[0101] Step 208, determine the second distance based on the distance between the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support support quality at the time and the corresponding first negative ideal point, and the distance between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support support quality at the time and the corresponding second negative ideal point.

[0102] As an example, the second distance is determined based on the absolute value of the distance between the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support support quality at the moment and the corresponding first negative ideal point, and the absolute value of the distance between the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for hydraulic support support quality at the moment and the corresponding second negative ideal point.

[0103] Among them, based on the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at this moment and the absolute value of the distance between the corresponding first negative ideal point, and the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at this moment and the absolute value of the distance between the corresponding second negative ideal point, the second distance is determined, including: for any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system, based on the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator at this moment and the absolute value of the distance between the corresponding first negative ideal point, and the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator at this moment and the absolute value of the distance between the corresponding second negative ideal point, determine the average of the absolute values ​​of the second distances; based on the average of the absolute values ​​of the second distances corresponding to each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system, determine the second distance.

[0104] As an example and not limitation, the second distance may be determined by the following formula:

[0105]

[0106] Indicates The second distance at this moment, Indicates The next moment The positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring index , and the corresponding first negative ideal point The distance between Indicates The next moment Negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring index , and the corresponding second negative ideal point The distance between.

[0107] Step 209: Determine the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at this moment based on the first distance and the second distance.

[0108] As an example, the support quality deviation value can be calculated by the following formula:

[0109]

[0110] For the The support quality deviation value at the moment is: The larger it is, the better the support quality of the hydraulic support is. For the The first distance corresponding to the moment, For the The second distance corresponding to the moment.

[0111] Step 2010: Determine a dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment.

[0112] As an example, in the case where there are multiple hydraulic supports, the dynamic evaluation results of the support quality of the hydraulic supports are determined based on the support quality deviation values ​​of the hydraulic supports at at least one moment, including: determining a reference deviation value based on the support quality deviation value of each hydraulic support at at least one moment; comparing each support quality deviation value with the reference deviation value to determine the number of support quality deviation values ​​greater than the reference deviation value; and determining the dynamic evaluation results of the support quality of the hydraulic supports based on the number.

[0113] The reference deviation value calculated based on actual monitoring data can more objectively and truly reflect the actual situation of the hydraulic support quality, reduce the interference of human factors, and improve the objectivity and reliability of the reference deviation value.

[0114] Optionally, based on the support quality deviation value of each hydraulic support at at least one moment, an average deviation value is determined, and the average deviation value is used as a reference deviation value.

[0115] In order to avoid the interference of accidental factors on the support quality assessment results and improve the accuracy of the support quality assessment results, as a possible implementation method, if the number of support quality deviation values ​​greater than the reference deviation value is greater than the set number, it is determined that the support quality of multiple hydraulic supports is good; if the number of support quality deviation values ​​greater than the reference deviation value is less than or equal to the set number, it is determined that the support quality of multiple hydraulic supports is poor.

[0116] As another possible implementation, the support quality grades of multiple hydraulic supports may be determined according to the number of support quality deviation values ​​greater than the reference deviation value, and the support quality grade may be used as a dynamic evaluation result.

[0117] In this embodiment, according to whether the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator is within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, the positive evaluation value and the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value are determined based on the corresponding non-negative interval and non-positive interval. When the real-time monitoring value is within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, the positive evaluation value plays a leading role. When the real-time monitoring value is not within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, the negative evaluation value plays a leading role, thereby improving the assessment accuracy of the support quality.

[0118] In an optional embodiment, the present application combines the real-time monitoring values ​​of each monitoring indicator of a hydraulic support at 5 moments to evaluate the support quality of the hydraulic support:

[0119] As shown in Table 1, Table 1 includes the real-time monitoring values ​​of 15 monitoring indicators at 5 moments.

[0120]

[0121] Table 1

[0122] As shown in Table 2, Table 2 includes the bipolar evaluation sets corresponding to each real-time monitoring value.

[0123]

[0124] Table 2

[0125] The positive ideal point sets corresponding to each monitoring indicator determined by the bipolar evaluation set of each monitoring indicator at 5 moments are:

[0126] I 0 =[(0.98,-0.27),(0.6,-0.02),(0.4,-0.24),(1,-0.25),(0.95,-0.01),(1,-0.31),(0.75,-0.05),(0.5,-0.01),(0.8,-0.03),(1,-0.02),(0.75,-0.04),(0.75,-0.02),(0.25,-0.04),(1,-0.19),(1,0)]

[0127] The negative ideal point sets corresponding to each monitoring indicator determined by the bipolar evaluation set of each monitoring indicator at 5 moments are:

[0128] I *=[(0,-0.78),(0,-0.46),(0,-0.48),(0,-0.5),(0.65,-0.47),(0.2,-0.8),(0.75,-0.42),(0.5,-0.22),(0.25,-0.26),(0,-0.42),(0.5,-0.42),(0.63,-0.31),(0,-0.48),(0.5,-0.44),(0,-1),]

[0129] The first distance and the second distance at each moment determined based on the positive ideal point set and the negative ideal point set corresponding to each monitoring indicator are respectively: , ; , ; , ; , ; , .

[0130] The support quality deviation values ​​at each moment determined based on the first distance and the second distance corresponding to each moment are: c1=0.59, c2=0.66, c3=0.55, c4=0.48, c5=0.40.

[0131] According to the support quality deviation value at each moment, it can be seen that the support quality of the hydraulic support at moment 5 is poor. It can also be qualitatively seen from Table 1 that at moment 5, the safety valve of the hydraulic support is opened, the hydraulic support is depressurized, and the support quality is poor.

[0132] In order to implement the above-mentioned embodiment, the embodiment of the present application also proposes a dynamic assessment device for the support quality of a hydraulic support.

[0133] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the structure of a hydraulic support support quality dynamic assessment device provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0134] like Figure 3 As shown, the hydraulic support support quality dynamic assessment device 300 includes:

[0135] A construction module 310 is used to construct a dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports based on various monitoring indicators of the hydraulic supports;

[0136] The acquisition module 320 is used to obtain the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring index in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at at least one time, and determine the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value;

[0137] The first determination module 330 is used to determine, for any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation indicator system, a first positive ideal point and a first negative ideal point corresponding to a positive evaluation value of a real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and a second positive ideal point and a second negative ideal point corresponding to a negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator;

[0138] The second determination module 340 is used to determine the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at any time based on the difference between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the time and the corresponding first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point, and the difference between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the time and the corresponding second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point;

[0139] The evaluation module 350 is used to determine the dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment.

[0140] Optionally, the acquisition module 320 is used to:

[0141] For the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support quality at any time, determine whether the real-time monitoring value is within the corresponding normal monitoring value range;

[0142] In response to the real-time monitoring value being within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, the real-time monitoring value is standardized based on the set first non-negative interval to obtain a positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at any time; based on the set first non-positive interval, a random value is selected to obtain a negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at any time;

[0143] In response to the real-time monitoring value not being within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, a random value is selected based on a set second non-negative interval to obtain a positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at any time; based on the set second non-positive interval, the real-time monitoring value is standardized to obtain a negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at any time;

[0144] Among them, the right endpoint value of the first non-negative interval is greater than the right endpoint value of the second non-negative interval, and the left endpoint value of the first non-positive interval is greater than the left endpoint value of the second non-positive interval.

[0145] Optionally, the second determining module 340 is used to:

[0146] Determine the first distance based on the distance between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at the time and the corresponding first positive ideal point, and the distance between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at the time and the corresponding second positive ideal point;

[0147] Determine the second distance based on the distance between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at the time and the corresponding first negative ideal point, and the distance between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at the time and the corresponding second negative ideal point;

[0148] Based on the first distance and the second distance, a support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment is determined.

[0149] Optionally, the second determining module 340 is used to:

[0150] Determine a distance sum of the first distance and the second distance;

[0151] The ratio of the second distance to the sum of the distances is taken as the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment.

[0152] Optionally, the first determining module 330 is used to:

[0153] In the case of obtaining the real-time monitoring values ​​of each monitoring indicator at multiple moments in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system, for any monitoring indicator, from the positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicator at multiple moments, the maximum positive evaluation value is selected as the first positive ideal point for the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation, and the minimum positive evaluation value is selected as the first negative ideal point for the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation;

[0154] From the negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicators at multiple times, the maximum negative evaluation value is selected as the second positive ideal point for the dynamic evaluation of the hydraulic support support quality, and the minimum negative evaluation value is selected as the second negative ideal point for the dynamic evaluation of the hydraulic support support quality.

[0155] Optionally, when there are multiple hydraulic supports, the evaluation module 350 is used to:

[0156] Determine a reference deviation value of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value of each hydraulic support at at least one moment;

[0157] Compare each support quality deviation value with the reference deviation value to determine the number of support quality deviation values ​​greater than the reference deviation value;

[0158] Based on quantity, dynamic evaluation results of the support quality of multiple hydraulic supports are determined.

[0159] It should be noted that the above explanations of the embodiment of the method for dynamically evaluating the support quality of a hydraulic support are also applicable to the device for dynamically evaluating the support quality of a hydraulic support of this embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0160] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided for an embodiment of the present application. Among them, the electronic device 400 in this embodiment is intended to represent various forms of digital computers, such as laptop computers, desktop computers, workbenches, personal digital assistants, servers, blade servers, mainframe computers, and other suitable computers. The electronic device can also represent various forms of mobile devices, such as personal digital processing, cellular phones, smart phones, wearable devices, and other similar computing devices. The components shown herein, their connections and relationships, and their functions are merely examples and are not intended to limit the implementation of the present disclosure described and / or required herein.

[0161] like Figure 4 As shown, the electronic device 400 includes:

[0162] The memory 401 and the processor 402, a bus 403 connecting different components (including the memory 401 and the processor 402), the memory 401 stores a computer program, and when the processor 402 executes the program, the dynamic assessment method of the hydraulic support support quality of the embodiment of the present application is implemented.

[0163] Bus 403 represents one or more of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, a processor or a local bus using any of a variety of bus structures. For example, these architectures include but are not limited to Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MAC) bus, Enhanced ISA bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus.

[0164] The electronic device 400 typically includes a variety of electronic device readable media. These media can be any available media that can be accessed by the electronic device 400, including volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

[0165] The memory 401 may also include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 404 and / or cache memory 405. The electronic device 400 may further include other removable / non-removable, volatile / non-volatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, the storage system 406 may be used to read and write non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media ( Figure 4 not shown, usually called a "hard drive"). Although Figure 4 Not shown, a disk drive for reading and writing to a removable non-volatile disk (e.g., a "floppy disk"), and an optical disk drive for reading and writing to a removable non-volatile optical disk (e.g., a CD-ROM, a DVD-ROM, or other optical media) may be provided. In these cases, each drive may be connected to bus 403 via one or more data medium interfaces. Memory 401 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules that are configured to perform the functions of each embodiment of the present application.

[0166] A program / utility 408 having a set (at least one) of program modules 407 may be stored, for example, in the memory 401, such program modules 407 including but not limited to an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data, each of which or some combination may include an implementation of a network environment. The program modules 407 generally perform the functions and / or methods of the embodiments described herein.

[0167] The electronic device 400 may also communicate with one or more external devices 409 (e.g., keyboard, pointing device, display 411, etc.), one or more devices that enable a user to interact with the electronic device 400, and / or any device that enables the electronic device 400 to communicate with one or more other computing devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.). Such communication may be performed through an input / output (I / O) interface 412. Furthermore, the electronic device 400 may also communicate with one or more networks (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and / or a public network, such as the Internet) through a network adapter 413. Figure 4 As shown, the network adapter 413 communicates with other modules of the electronic device 400 via the bus 403. It should be understood that, although not shown in the figure, other hardware and / or software modules can be used in conjunction with the electronic device 400, including but not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data backup storage systems.

[0168] The processor 402 executes various functional applications and data processing by running the programs stored in the memory 401 .

[0169] It should be noted that the implementation process and technical principles of the electronic equipment of this embodiment refer to the aforementioned explanation of the dynamic assessment method for the support quality of the hydraulic support in the embodiment of the present application, and will not be repeated here.

[0170] In order to implement the above embodiments, the present application also proposes a computer-readable storage medium, in which computer-executable instructions are stored. When the computer-executable instructions are executed by a processor, they are used to implement the methods provided by the above embodiments.

[0171] In order to implement the above embodiments, the present application also proposes a computer program product, including a computer program, which implements the methods provided by the above embodiments when executed by a processor.

[0172] Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate other embodiments of the present disclosure after considering the specification and practicing the invention disclosed herein. The present disclosure is intended to cover any variations, uses or adaptations of the present disclosure that follow the general principles of the present disclosure and include common knowledge or customary techniques in the art that are not disclosed in the present disclosure. The description and examples are to be considered exemplary only, and the true scope and spirit of the present disclosure are indicated by the following claims.

[0173] It should be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the exact structures that have been described above and shown in the drawings, and that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the scope thereof. The scope of the present disclosure is limited only by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for dynamic assessment of hydraulic support quality, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Based on the monitoring indicators of hydraulic supports, a dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports is established; Obtain the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at at least one moment, and determine the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value; wherein, the determination of the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value includes: for the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at any moment, determine whether the real-time monitoring value is within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval; in response to the real-time monitoring value being within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, based on a set first non-negative interval, standardize the real-time monitoring value to obtain the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at any moment; based on the set first non-positive interval, perform random value selection , obtain the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at any time; in response to the real-time monitoring value not being within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, based on the set second non-negative interval, perform random value selection to obtain the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at any time; based on the set second non-positive interval, standardize the real-time monitoring value to obtain the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system of hydraulic support support quality at any time; wherein, the right endpoint value of the first non-negative interval is greater than the right endpoint value of the second non-negative interval, and the left endpoint value of the first non-positive interval is greater than the left endpoint value of the second non-positive interval; For any of the monitoring indicators in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of hydraulic support, determine the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and determine the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator; wherein, for any of the monitoring indicators in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of hydraulic support, determine the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and determine the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, including: in obtaining the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of hydraulic support In the case of real-time monitoring values ​​of each monitoring indicator at multiple moments, for any of the monitoring indicators, from the positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicator at multiple moments, the maximum value of the positive evaluation value is selected as the first positive ideal point for dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support, and the minimum value of the positive evaluation value is selected as the first negative ideal point for dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support; from the negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicator at multiple moments, the maximum value of the negative evaluation value is selected as the second positive ideal point for dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support, and the minimum value of the negative evaluation value is selected as the second negative ideal point for dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support; For any moment, based on the difference between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point and first negative ideal point, and the difference between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point and second negative ideal point, determine the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment; Based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment, a dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support is determined.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The method of determining the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment based on the difference between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point and first negative ideal point, and the difference between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point and second negative ideal point, comprises: Determine the first distance based on the distance between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at the time and the corresponding first positive ideal point, and the distance between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at the time and the corresponding second positive ideal point; Determine the second distance based on the distance between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of the hydraulic support and the corresponding first negative ideal point, and the distance between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of the hydraulic support and the corresponding second negative ideal point; Based on the first distance and the second distance, a support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment is determined.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The determining, based on the first distance and the second distance, the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment includes: determining a distance sum of the first distance and the second distance; The ratio of the second distance to the sum of the distances is used as the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that: In the case where there are multiple hydraulic supports, determining the dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment includes: Determine a reference deviation value of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value of each hydraulic support at at least one moment; Compare each of the support quality deviation values ​​with the reference deviation value to determine the number of support quality deviation values ​​greater than the reference deviation value; Based on the quantity, dynamic evaluation results of the support quality of the plurality of hydraulic supports are determined.

5. A dynamic assessment device for hydraulic support quality, characterized in that: include: A construction module is used to construct a dynamic evaluation index system for the support quality of hydraulic supports based on various monitoring indicators of hydraulic supports; An acquisition module is used to acquire the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at at least one moment, and to determine the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value; wherein, the determination of the positive evaluation value and negative evaluation value of each real-time monitoring value includes: for the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at any moment, determining whether the real-time monitoring value is within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval; in response to the real-time monitoring value being within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, based on a set first non-negative interval, standardizing the real-time monitoring value to obtain the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system at any moment; based on a set first non-positive interval, performing random Value selection is performed to obtain a negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of hydraulic support at any time; in response to the real-time monitoring value not being within the corresponding normal monitoring value interval, a random value selection is performed based on a set second non-negative interval to obtain a positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of hydraulic support at any time; based on a set second non-positive interval, the real-time monitoring value is standardized to obtain a negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of any monitoring indicator in the dynamic evaluation index system for support quality of hydraulic support at any time; wherein, the right endpoint value of the first non-negative interval is greater than the right endpoint value of the second non-negative interval, and the left endpoint value of the first non-positive interval is greater than the left endpoint value of the second non-positive interval; The first determination module is used to determine, for any of the monitoring indicators in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system, the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator; wherein, for any of the monitoring indicators in the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system, determining the first positive ideal point and the first negative ideal point corresponding to the positive evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, and determining the second positive ideal point and the second negative ideal point corresponding to the negative evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of the monitoring indicator, includes: obtaining the hydraulic support support quality dynamic evaluation index system; In the case of real-time monitoring values ​​of each monitoring indicator at multiple moments in the indicator system, for any of the monitoring indicators, from the positive evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicators at multiple moments, the maximum value of the positive evaluation value is selected as the first positive ideal point for dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support, and the minimum value of the positive evaluation value is selected as the first negative ideal point for dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support; from the negative evaluation values ​​corresponding to the real-time monitoring values ​​of the monitoring indicators at multiple moments, the maximum value of the negative evaluation value is selected as the second positive ideal point for dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support, and the minimum value of the negative evaluation value is selected as the second negative ideal point for dynamic evaluation of the support quality of the hydraulic support; A second determination module is used to determine, for any moment, the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at the moment based on the difference between the positive pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the moment and the corresponding first positive ideal point and first negative ideal point, and the difference between the negative pole evaluation value of the real-time monitoring value of each monitoring indicator at the moment and the corresponding second positive ideal point and second negative ideal point; An evaluation module is used to determine a dynamic evaluation result of the support quality of the hydraulic support based on the support quality deviation value of the hydraulic support at at least one moment.

6. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: A processor, and a memory communicatively connected to the processor; The memory stores computer-executable instructions; The processor executes the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory to implement the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

7. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores computer-executable instructions, which are used to implement the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 when executed by a processor.

8. A computer program product, characterized in that The invention comprises a computer program, which implements the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 when being executed by a processor.

Images