Evaluation method, device and electronic equipment for shear wall structure scheme

Abstract

The present invention relates to the field of computer science and technology, and provides a method, device, and electronic device for evaluating shear wall structural schemes. The method comprises: obtaining a shear wall structural scheme to be evaluated, the shear wall structural scheme including component information of the shear wall structure; performing structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain values ​​of pre-designed structural indicators and pre-designed economic indicators; and generating an evaluation result for the shear wall structural scheme based on the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, and the values ​​of the structural indicators and the values ​​of the economic indicators, wherein the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are established based on expert experience. This method provides an automated evaluation scheme that comprehensively considers structural safety and economic efficiency, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency of shear wall structural schemes.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of computer science and technology, and in particular to a method, device and electronic equipment for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme. Background Art

[0002] Shear wall structures are a common lateral force-resisting system in buildings, primarily used to withstand horizontal shear forces generated by wind loads and earthquakes. In the architectural design process, the rational design of shear wall structures is crucial for ensuring the safety, economy, and comfort of a building.

[0003] Currently, structural engineers and industry experts primarily evaluate shear wall structural proposals to determine whether they meet building codes and standards, including seismic design codes and structural load specifications. However, this evaluation method is inefficient and can be subject to subjective factors. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The present invention provides a shear wall structure scheme evaluation method, device and electronic equipment to solve the defect in the prior art that the evaluation process of the shear wall structure scheme requires iterative execution of active shear wall structure scheme evaluation queries, resulting in large consumption of hardware resources and evaluation time, and realize a more automated and efficient shear wall structure scheme evaluation process.

[0005] The present invention provides a method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme, comprising: obtaining a shear wall structure scheme to be evaluated, the shear wall structure scheme including component information in the shear wall structure; performing structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain values ​​of pre-designed structural indicators and pre-designed economic indicators; generating an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme according to weights of the structural indicators, weights of the economic indicators, values ​​of the structural indicators, and values ​​of the economic indicators, wherein the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are established based on expert experience.

[0006] According to the present invention, a method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme is provided, which is characterized in that the evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme is generated according to the weight of the structural indicator, the weight of the economic indicator, the value of the structural indicator and the value of the economic indicator, including: determining the membership of the structural indicator according to the value of the structural indicator and the preset code limit of the structural indicator; determining the membership of the economic indicator according to the percentage of the value of the economic indicator in a predefined indicator range; and performing fuzzy comprehensive analysis according to the weight of the structural indicator, the weight of the economic indicator, the membership of the structural indicator and the membership of the economic indicator to generate a score for the shear wall structure scheme.

[0007] According to the present invention, a shear wall structure scheme evaluation method is provided, characterized in that the determining the membership of the structural indicator according to the value of the structural indicator and the preset code limit of the structural indicator includes: comparing the value of the structural indicator with the code limit; if the value of the structural indicator meets the requirement of the code limit, determining the membership of the structural indicator to be 1; if the value of the structural indicator does not meet the requirement of the code limit, calculating the membership of the structural indicator according to the following formula:

[0008] ;

[0009] in, r ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The membership degree of the structural indicators, x ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The value of a structural indicator, u i Indicates the i The regulatory limits of the structural indicators.

[0010] According to the present invention, a shear wall structure scheme evaluation method is provided, characterized in that the fuzzy comprehensive analysis is performed based on the weight of the structural index, the weight of the economic index, the membership degree of the structural index, and the membership degree of the economic index to generate a score for the shear wall structure scheme, comprising: calculating the score of the shear wall structure scheme by using the following fuzzy mathematical relationship equation:

[0011] ;

[0012] in, B represents the score matrix, Representative i The score of the shear wall structure scheme is R Represents the membership matrix, which is composed of the membership of the indicator r ij composition, V Represents the weight matrix, which is composed of the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators. Indicates the i The weight of the indicator, n represents the total number of structural and economic indicators, m Represents the number of shear wall structural solutions to be evaluated.

[0013] According to the present invention, a method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme is provided, characterized in that the step of establishing the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators includes: ranking the importance of the structural indicators and the importance of the economic indicators based on expert experience; and generating the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators through a hierarchical analysis method based on the ranking results.

[0014] According to the present invention, a method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme is provided, characterized in that the components in the shear wall structure include shear walls, beams and floor slabs, and the component information is organized in the form of key-value structured data. The keys in the component information of the shear walls and beams include identification information, node one coordinates, node two coordinates, component material strength, component cross-sectional dimensions and component load arrangement information, and the keys in the component information of the floor slabs include identification information, node coordinate list, component material strength, component cross-sectional dimensions and component load arrangement information.

[0015] According to the present invention, a method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme is provided, characterized in that the structural indicators include period ratio, displacement ratio, inter-story drift angle, lateral stiffness ratio, minimum shear-to-weight ratio and axial compression ratio; and the economic indicators include concrete usage and steel usage.

[0016] According to the present invention, a method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme is provided, characterized in that the shear wall structure scheme is designed and generated based on a generative artificial intelligence algorithm.

[0017] The present invention also provides an evaluation device for a shear wall structure scheme, comprising: an acquisition module, configured to acquire a shear wall structure scheme to be evaluated, the shear wall structure scheme including component information of the shear wall structure; a calculation module, configured to perform structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain values ​​of pre-designed structural indicators and values ​​of pre-designed economic indicators; a generation module, configured to generate an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme based on the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators and the values ​​of the economic indicators, wherein the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are established based on expert experience.

[0018] The present invention also provides an electronic device, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the program, the evaluation method for the shear wall structure scheme described above is implemented.

[0019] The present invention also provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the evaluation method for any of the shear wall structure solutions described above.

[0020] The present invention also provides a computer program product, comprising a computer program, wherein when the computer program is executed by a processor, the computer program implements the evaluation method of any of the above shear wall structure solutions.

[0021] The shear wall structure scheme evaluation method, device and electronic equipment provided by the present invention perform structural mechanics calculations based on component information in the shear wall structure scheme to obtain values ​​of structural indicators and economic indicators, and then generate evaluation results of the shear wall structure scheme based on the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators and the values ​​of the economic indicators, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency of the shear wall structure scheme. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0022] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the present invention or the prior art, a brief introduction is given below to the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0023] Figure 1 This is one of the flow charts of the evaluation method for the shear wall structure scheme provided by the present invention.

[0024] Figure 2 This is the second flow chart of the evaluation method for the shear wall structure solution provided by the present invention.

[0025] Figure 3 It is an evaluation flow chart of an exemplary shear wall structure solution in the present invention.

[0026] Figure 4 It is a structural schematic diagram of an evaluation device for a shear wall structure solution provided by the present invention.

[0027] Figure 5 It is a structural schematic diagram of the electronic device provided by the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0028] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the present invention more clear, the technical solutions of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the embodiments described are only some of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of them. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0029] The following combination Figure 1-Figure 5 The present invention describes a method, device and electronic device for evaluating a shear wall structure solution.

[0030] Figure 1 This is one of the flow charts of the evaluation method of the shear wall structure scheme provided by the embodiment of the present invention, such as Figure 1 As shown, the method includes:

[0031] Step 101: Obtain a shear wall structure solution to be evaluated.

[0032] In this embodiment, the shear wall structure scheme includes the component information of the shear wall structure. The components in the shear wall structure may include walls, floor slabs, and beams. In some cases, some special components may also be set up. For example, in order to increase the rigidity and stability of the structure, supports may be set up in the shear walls, such as lateral supports between shear walls. Component information generally includes geometric coordinate information, material information, and load information. In practice, other component information, such as manufacturing process information, may also be added as needed. In addition, the shear wall structure scheme to be evaluated can be generated by an artificial intelligence algorithm or designed by an engineer.

[0033] Step 102: Perform structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain pre-designed structural index values ​​and pre-designed economic index values.

[0034] Performing structural mechanics calculations based on component information is a crucial step in structural engineering. It involves mathematical modeling and numerical analysis of the mechanical responses of individual components (such as beams, columns, and shear walls) in a building or engineering structure when subjected to various loads. Based on the component information, a mathematical model can be established, followed by the application of loads and boundary conditions. Finally, the system of equations can be solved to determine the component responses, and from this, the values ​​of pre-designed structural and economic indicators can be derived. Alternatively, the user interface provided by the structural analysis software can be used to automatically construct the mechanical analysis model, perform analysis, and extract calculation results, resulting in the desired structural and economic indicators. Structural indicators can optionally include strength, stiffness, and stability, while economic indicators can include material and construction costs.

[0035] Step 103: Generate an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme according to the weight of the structural index, the weight of the economic index, the value of the structural index, and the value of the economic index.

[0036] In this embodiment, the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are established based on expert experience. Expert experience can refer to the judgments, insights, and skills accumulated by experts with professional knowledge and rich practical experience in a specific field. The weights can be set directly through expert experience, or the experts' judgments on the importance of the indicators can be obtained through questionnaires, and the weights of the indicators can be calculated based on this. According to the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators, and the values ​​of the economic indicators, the evaluation results of the shear wall structure scheme are generated. The evaluation results can be obtained by weighted summing the values ​​of the structural indicators and the economic indicators according to the determined weights. If the index values ​​have large numerical differences in magnitude, the values ​​of the structural indicators and the economic indicators can be normalized first and then weighted summed according to the weights. Then, the evaluation results of different shear wall structure schemes can be analyzed and compared to determine which scheme performs best overall. The evaluation results can provide a basis for decision makers to help them choose the most appropriate shear wall structure scheme.

[0037] The evaluation method for the shear wall structure scheme provided by the present invention realizes an automated evaluation scheme that comprehensively considers structural safety and economy, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency of the shear wall structure scheme.

[0038] See also Figure 2 In step 103, the evaluation results of the shear wall structure scheme are generated according to the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators, and the values ​​of the economic indicators, which may include:

[0039] Step 201: Determine the membership degree of the structural indicator according to the value of the structural indicator and the pre-set standard limit of the structural indicator.

[0040] In this implementation, the code limits for structural indicators can be set according to relevant building codes and standards. Determining the degree of membership of a structural indicator is a step in the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, used to assess whether the structural indicator meets the pre-set code limits. The degree of membership is a numerical value between 0 and 1 that indicates the degree to which a structural indicator belongs to a specific category (such as "qualified," "unqualified," "compliant with code," or "non-compliant"). For each structural indicator, the difference between its actual value and the code limit can be calculated. Based on the size of the difference, the degree to which the indicator belongs to the "qualified" category is determined. For example, if the code limits are divided into two categories: "qualified" and "unqualified," then the difference greater than the code limit is classified as "unqualified," while the difference less than or equal to the code limit is classified as "qualified." Generally, smaller differences indicate higher degrees of membership, while larger differences indicate lower degrees of membership.

[0041] Step 202: Determine the membership degree of the economic indicator according to the percentage of the economic indicator value in the predefined indicator range.

[0042] In this implementation, the economic indicator range can be set based on project requirements and budget, or determined based on the economic indicator values ​​of all evaluated options. This range typically includes an upper and lower limit, representing the ideal and worst-case scenarios for the economic indicator. If a smaller economic indicator is preferred, the economic indicator's membership can be calculated as 1 minus the ratio of the economic indicator value to the range. If a larger economic indicator is preferred, the economic indicator's membership can be calculated as the ratio of the economic indicator value to the range.

[0043] Step 203: Perform fuzzy comprehensive analysis based on the weight of the structural index, the weight of the economic index, the membership degree of the structural index, and the membership degree of the economic index to generate a score for the shear wall structure solution.

[0044] Fuzzy comprehensive analysis is a decision-support method for handling uncertainty and ambiguity that combines fuzzy set theory and multi-attribute decision analysis. In the evaluation of shear wall structural schemes, fuzzy comprehensive analysis can be used to comprehensively consider the membership of multiple structural and economic indicators to generate a comprehensive score. This approach enables an objective and comprehensive evaluation of shear wall structural schemes, thereby improving the quality and efficiency of design decisions.

[0045] In some optional implementations, determining the degree of membership of the structural indicator based on the value of the structural indicator and a preset specification limit of the structural indicator includes: comparing the value of the structural indicator with the specification limit; if the value of the structural indicator meets the requirement of the specification limit, determining the degree of membership of the structural indicator to be 1; if the value of the structural indicator does not meet the requirement of the specification limit, calculating the degree of membership of the structural indicator according to the following formula:

[0046] ;

[0047] in, r ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The membership degree of an indicator, x ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The value of the indicator, u i Indicates the i The specification limit of each indicator.

[0048] In the above formula iThe range of values ​​is related to the order of the pre-determined structural indicators. As an example, define is a single-level factor set, where Representative i indicators, including structural indicators and economic indicators. n Among the indicators, a The indicators are structural indicators calculated according to this formula. i is a natural number ， The value range is 1 to a .

[0049] In particular, if the structural indicator is the axial compression ratio, then when calculating the membership of the axial compression ratio, the membership of the axial compression ratio can be defined as the ratio of the number of shear walls in the scheme that meet the code restrictions to the number of all shear walls in the scheme.

[0050] In addition, for each economic index, the following formula can be used to determine its membership. The economic index can include the amount of concrete and the amount of steel:

[0051] ;

[0052] in, x imax and x imin Respectively represent i The maximum and minimum values ​​of the economic indicators among all alternatives. i The range of values ​​is related to the order of the pre-determined structural indicators. As an example, define is a single-level factor set, where Representative i indicators, including structural indicators and economic indicators. n Among the indicators, except for the a The first indicator is a structural indicator, and the remaining indicators are economic indicators calculated according to this formula. i is a natural number ， The value range is a+ 1 to n .

[0053] In some optional implementations, an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme is generated based on the weight of the structural indicator, the weight of the economic indicator, the value of the structural indicator, and the value of the economic indicator, including: determining the membership of the structural indicator based on the value of the structural indicator and the pre-set code limit of the structural indicator; determining the membership of the economic indicator based on the percentage of the value of the economic indicator in the pre-defined indicator range; and performing fuzzy comprehensive analysis based on the weight of the structural indicator, the weight of the economic indicator, the membership of the structural indicator, and the membership of the economic indicator to generate a score for the shear wall structure scheme.

[0054] In some optional implementations, a fuzzy comprehensive analysis is performed based on the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the membership degrees of the structural indicators, and the membership degrees of the economic indicators to generate a score for the shear wall structure solution, including: calculating the score for the shear wall structure solution using the following fuzzy mathematical relationship equation:

[0055] ;

[0056] in, B represents the score matrix, Representative i The score of the shear wall structure scheme is R Represents the membership matrix, which is composed of the membership of the indicator r ij composition, V Represents the weight matrix, which is composed of the weights of structural indicators and economic indicators. Indicates the i The weight of the indicator, n Represents the total number of structural and economic indicators, m Represents the number of shear wall structural solutions to be evaluated.

[0057] The weight matrix is ​​set as ,in Indicates the i The weight of the indicator, and from the previous normalization operation, we can know .

[0058] In some optional implementations, the steps of establishing weights of structural indicators and economic indicators include: ranking the importance of structural indicators and economic indicators based on expert experience; and generating weights of structural indicators and economic indicators through hierarchical analysis based on the ranking results.

[0059] Preferably, questionnaire surveys and statistical analysis can be conducted to obtain expert experience. The questionnaire content includes ranking the importance of the aforementioned structural and economic indicators. Importance can be divided into equal importance, slightly important, obviously important, strongly important, and extremely important, from low to high importance. The ranking must comply with relevant proportion requirements, that is, the proportion of each type of importance does not exceed a certain specified proportion, ensuring that the importance scores of different indicators are different. The data obtained by analyzing the questionnaire can be scaled according to the importance criteria of the judgment matrix. The data of the factors affecting structural safety and economic factors can be statistically analyzed and normalized to obtain the judgment matrix between the various factor indicators.

[0060] As an example, the structural judgment matrix A1 is:

[0061]

[0062] The economic judgment matrix A2 is:

[0063]

[0064] Among them, the order of horizontal and vertical indicators of the structural judgment matrix A1 is: period ratio, displacement ratio, inter-story drift angle, lateral stiffness ratio, minimum shear weight ratio, and axial compression ratio; the order of horizontal and vertical indicators of the economic judgment matrix A2 is: concrete consumption, steel consumption. The eigenvector corresponding to the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrix is ​​further normalized to obtain the weight of each factor indicator. The eigenvectors of the matrix after normalization are calculated as follows: Structural indicator weight matrix , economic index weight matrix .

[0065] In some optional implementations, the components in the shear wall structure include shear walls, beams, and floor slabs, and the component information is organized in the form of key-value structured data. The keys in the component information of shear walls and beams include identification information, node one coordinates, node two coordinates, component material strength, component cross-sectional dimensions, and component load arrangement information. The keys in the component information of floor slabs include identification information, a list of node coordinates, component material strength, component cross-sectional dimensions, and component load arrangement information. As an example, "id": 286 can be a set of key-value structured data of identification information. By reading the structured data, the geometric coordinate information, material information, and load information of the shear walls, beams, and floor slabs in the shear wall structure can be obtained.

[0066] In some optional implementations, the structural indicators include period ratio, displacement ratio, inter-story drift angle, lateral stiffness ratio, minimum shear weight ratio and axial compression ratio; and the economic indicators include concrete consumption and steel consumption.

[0067] In some implementation options, shear wall structural solutions are generated based on generative artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), graph neural networks (GNNs), and diffusion models (DMs). The rapid development of intelligent shear wall design technology has effectively promoted the advancement of intelligent design. However, different design algorithms have different principles and provide varying design results. Due to the diverse design evaluation metrics, it is difficult to intuitively and accurately select the appropriate intelligent design solution. Therefore, automated decision-making methods are needed to assist in selecting the optimal intelligent design solution.

[0068] For shear wall structural schemes designed using various generative AI algorithms, the system automatically converts, analyzes, and extracts results from structured data into shear wall structural mechanics calculation models, automatically obtaining multi-index results for structural mechanical performance. Membership calculations are performed for both structural and economic indicators to generate a membership matrix. Expert research is conducted to determine the importance ranking of multiple indicators, and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to generate importance weights. Fuzzy comprehensive analysis results are then generated based on the membership matrix and multiple indicator importance weights. This proposed intelligent design decision-making method can effectively and automatically evaluate and select multiple intelligent design results, providing the optimal intelligent design solution.

[0069] As an example, the execution subject of this embodiment can read the structured data to obtain the geometric coordinate information of the shear wall, beam, and floor slab components in the shear wall structure, and use the user program interface provided by the structural analysis calculation software to automatically build, analyze, and extract the calculation results of the mechanical analysis model. The entire execution process is as follows: Figure 3 As shown in Table 1, the structural and economic indicators of the design are obtained, and the typical indicators are shown in Table 1.

[0070] Table 1 Typical performance indicators of shear wall structures

[0071]

[0072] Combining the membership matrix and the multi-index importance weight vector, the fuzzy comprehensive analysis results can be obtained, namely the structural score and economic score of each scheme of engineer design and intelligent design, as shown in Table 2.

[0073] Table 2 Final scoring results of typical shear wall structure schemes

[0074]

[0075] The evaluation device for the shear wall structure solution provided by the present invention is described below. The evaluation device for the shear wall structure solution described below and the evaluation method for the shear wall structure solution described above can be referred to in correspondence with each other.

[0076] Figure 4A schematic diagram of the structure of the evaluation device for the shear wall structure solution provided in the embodiment of the present application is shown as follows: Figure 4 As shown, it specifically includes: an acquisition module 401, which is configured to obtain a shear wall structure scheme to be evaluated, and the shear wall structure scheme includes component information of the shear wall structure; a calculation module 402, which is configured to perform structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain the values ​​of pre-designed structural indicators and pre-designed economic indicators; a generation module 403, which is configured to generate an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme according to the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators and the values ​​of the economic indicators, and the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are established based on expert experience.

[0077] In some optional implementations, the generation module 403 is further configured to: determine the membership of the structural indicator based on the value of the structural indicator and the pre-set specification limit of the structural indicator; determine the membership of the economic indicator based on the percentage of the value of the economic indicator in the pre-defined indicator range; perform fuzzy comprehensive analysis based on the weight of the structural indicator, the weight of the economic indicator, the membership of the structural indicator and the membership of the economic indicator to generate a score for the shear wall structure scheme.

[0078] In some optional implementations, the generating module 403 is further configured to: compare the value of the structural indicator with the specification limit; if the value of the structural indicator meets the requirement of the specification limit, determine the membership of the structural indicator to be 1; if the value of the structural indicator does not meet the requirement of the specification limit, calculate the membership of the structural indicator according to the following formula:

[0079] ;

[0080] in, r ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The membership degree of the structural indicators, x ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The value of a structural indicator, u i Indicates the i The regulatory limits of the structural indicators.

[0081] In some optional implementations, the generating module 403 is further configured to calculate the score of the shear wall structure solution by using the following fuzzy mathematical relationship equation:

[0082] ;

[0083] in, Brepresents the score matrix, Representative i The score of the shear wall structure scheme is R Represents the membership matrix, which is composed of the membership of the indicator r ij composition, V Represents the weight matrix, which is composed of the weights of structural indicators and economic indicators. Indicates the i The weight of the indicator, n Represents the total number of structural and economic indicators, m Represents the number of shear wall structural solutions to be evaluated.

[0084] In some optional implementations, the device also includes a weight establishment module, which is configured to: rank the importance of structural indicators and the importance of economic indicators based on expert experience; and generate weights of structural indicators and economic indicators through hierarchical analysis method based on the ranking results.

[0085] In some optional implementations, the components in the shear wall structure include shear walls, beams and floor slabs, and the component information is organized in the form of key-value structured data. The keys in the component information of shear walls and beams include identification information, node one coordinate, node two coordinate, component material strength, component cross-sectional dimensions and component load arrangement information; the keys in the component information of floor slabs include identification information, node coordinate list, component material strength, component cross-sectional dimensions and component load arrangement information.

[0086] In some optional implementations, the structural indicators include period ratio, displacement ratio, inter-story drift angle, lateral stiffness ratio, minimum shear weight ratio and axial compression ratio; and the economic indicators include concrete consumption and steel consumption.

[0087] In some optional implementations, the shear wall structure scheme is designed and generated based on a generative artificial intelligence algorithm.

[0088] In this embodiment, the specific processing of the acquisition module 401, the calculation module 402 and the generation module 403 of the evaluation device for the shear wall structure solution can be referred to. Figure 1 This corresponds to step 101, step 102 and step 103 in the embodiment.

[0089] The shear wall structure scheme evaluation device provided by the present invention realizes an automated evaluation scheme that comprehensively considers structural safety and economy, thereby improving the evaluation efficiency of the shear wall structure scheme.

[0090] Figure 5 An example of a physical structure diagram of an electronic device is shown below. Figure 5As shown, the electronic device may include: a processor 510, a communications interface 520, a memory 530, and a communications bus 540, wherein the processor 510, the communications interface 520, and the memory 530 communicate with each other via the communications bus 540. The processor 510 may call logic instructions in the memory 530 to execute a shear wall structure scheme evaluation method, which includes: obtaining a shear wall structure scheme to be evaluated, the shear wall structure scheme including component information of the shear wall structure; performing structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain pre-designed structural index values ​​and pre-designed economic index values; and generating an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme based on the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators, and the values ​​of the economic indicators, wherein the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are established based on expert experience.

[0091] Furthermore, the logic instructions in the aforementioned memory 530 can be implemented in the form of software functional modules and, when sold or used as an independent product, can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, or the portion that contributes to the prior art, or a portion of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for causing a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as a USB flash drive, a mobile hard drive, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk.

[0092] On the other hand, the present invention also provides a computer program product, which includes a computer program, which can be stored on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the computer can execute the shear wall structure scheme evaluation method provided by the above methods, the method including: obtaining the shear wall structure scheme to be evaluated, the shear wall structure scheme including component information of the shear wall structure; performing structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain the values ​​of pre-designed structural indicators and the values ​​of pre-designed economic indicators; generating the evaluation results of the shear wall structure scheme according to the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators and the values ​​of the economic indicators, and the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are established based on expert experience.

[0093] On the other hand, the present invention also provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements an evaluation method for the shear wall structure scheme provided by the above-mentioned methods, the method comprising: obtaining a shear wall structure scheme to be evaluated, the shear wall structure scheme including component information of the shear wall structure; performing structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain values ​​of pre-designed structural indicators and values ​​of pre-designed economic indicators; generating an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme according to the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators and the values ​​of the economic indicators, the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators being established based on expert experience.

[0094] The device embodiments described above are merely illustrative, wherein the modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, and the components shown as modules may or may not be physical modules, i.e., they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network modules. Some or all of the modules may be selected based on actual needs to achieve the objectives of the present embodiment. Those skilled in the art can understand and implement the present invention without inventive effort.

[0095] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art will clearly understand that each embodiment can be implemented using software plus a necessary general-purpose hardware platform, or of course, hardware. Based on this understanding, the essence of the above technical solution, or the portion that contributes to the prior art, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as ROM / RAM, a magnetic disk, or an optical disk, and includes a number of instructions for causing a computer device (such as a personal computer, server, or network device) to execute the methods described in each embodiment or certain portions of the embodiments.

[0096] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or make equivalent replacements for some of the technical features therein. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the various embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme, characterized in that: include: Obtaining a shear wall structure scheme to be evaluated, wherein the shear wall structure scheme includes component information of the shear wall structure; Performing structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain pre-designed structural index values ​​and pre-designed economic index values; generating an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme according to the weights of the structural indicators, the weights of the economic indicators, the values ​​of the structural indicators, and the values ​​of the economic indicators, wherein the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are established based on expert experience; Generating the evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme according to the weight of the structural index, the weight of the economic index, the value of the structural index, and the value of the economic index includes: Determining the degree of membership of the structural indicator according to the value of the structural indicator and the pre-set standard limit of the structural indicator; Determining the membership degree of the economic indicator according to the percentage of the value of the economic indicator in a predefined indicator range; Performing fuzzy comprehensive analysis based on the weight of the structural indicator, the weight of the economic indicator, the membership degree of the structural indicator, and the membership degree of the economic indicator to generate a score for the shear wall structure scheme; determining the membership degree of the structural indicator based on the value of the structural indicator and the pre-set standard limit of the structural indicator includes: comparing the value of the structural indicator with the specification limit; If the value of the structural indicator meets the requirement of the specification limit, the membership degree of the structural indicator is determined to be 1; If the value of the structural indicator does not meet the requirements of the specification limit, the membership degree of the structural indicator is calculated according to the following formula: ； in, r ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The membership degree of the structural indicators, x ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The value of a structural indicator, u i Indicates the i The standard limit of each structural indicator is calculated; the membership degree of the economic indicator is calculated according to the following formula: ； in, r ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The membership degree of each economic indicator is x ij Indicates the j The first shear wall structure scheme i The value of an economic indicator, x imax and x imin Respectively represent i The maximum and minimum values ​​of an economic indicator among all alternatives; The fuzzy comprehensive analysis is performed based on the weight of the structural index, the weight of the economic index, the membership degree of the structural index, and the membership degree of the economic index to generate a score for the shear wall structure scheme, including: The score of the shear wall structure solution is calculated using the following fuzzy mathematical relationship equation: ； in, B represents the score matrix, Representative i The score of the shear wall structure scheme is R Represents the membership matrix, which is composed of the membership of the indicator r ij composition, V Represents the weight matrix, which is composed of the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators. Indicates the i The weight of the indicator, n represents the total number of structural and economic indicators, m represents the number of shear wall structural solutions to be evaluated; the weight matrix is ​​set to ,in Indicates the i The weight of each indicator is obtained by normalization operation ; The structural indicators include period ratio, displacement ratio, inter-story displacement angle, lateral stiffness ratio, minimum shear weight ratio and axial compression ratio; the economic indicators include concrete consumption and steel consumption.

2. The method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme according to claim 1, wherein: The steps of establishing the weights of the structural indicators and the economic indicators include: Ranking the importance of the structural indicators and the importance of the economic indicators based on expert experience; According to the ranking results, the weights of the structural indicators and the weights of the economic indicators are generated through the hierarchical analysis method.

3. The method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme according to claim 1, wherein: The components in the shear wall structure include shear walls, beams and floor slabs. The component information is organized in the form of key-value structured data. The keys in the component information of the shear walls and beams include identification information, node one coordinates, node two coordinates, component material strength, component cross-sectional dimensions and component load arrangement information. The keys in the component information of the floor slabs include identification information, node coordinate list, component material strength, component cross-sectional dimensions and component load arrangement information.

4. The method for evaluating a shear wall structure scheme according to claim 1, wherein: The shear wall structure scheme is designed and generated based on a generative artificial intelligence algorithm.

5. A shear wall structure scheme evaluation device implementing the shear wall structure scheme evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: include: an acquisition module configured to acquire a shear wall structure solution to be evaluated, wherein the shear wall structure solution includes component information of the shear wall structure; a calculation module configured to perform structural mechanics calculations based on the component information to obtain values ​​of pre-designed structural indicators and pre-designed economic indicators; A generation module is configured to generate an evaluation result of the shear wall structure scheme based on the weight of the structural index, the weight of the economic index, the value of the structural index and the value of the economic index, wherein the weight of the structural index and the weight of the economic index are established based on expert experience.

6. An electronic device, characterized in that: The method comprises a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the program, the method for evaluating the shear wall structure scheme according to any one of claims 1 to 4 is implemented.

Images