A performance evaluation system and method

Abstract

The present invention belongs to the technical field of performance evaluation, and specifically relates to a performance evaluation system and method, which creates a personal performance evaluation index data set, assigns weights to personal performance evaluation indicators; assigns values ​​to each personal performance evaluation indicator in turn according to the ranking of each personal performance evaluation indicator, and calculates the total performance evaluation value of each person; divides all people according to the projects they participate in, and extracts the project-related performance evaluation values ​​of project participants based on the projects, and assigns corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of relevant personal performance evaluation indicators; calculates the performance evaluation values ​​of each project; extracts the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college, and calculates the performance evaluation values ​​of each college; assigns weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and calculates the performance evaluation values ​​of each school. The comprehensive performance evaluation of colleges and universities is realized, which is beneficial to the overall performance management of colleges and universities, and the performance evaluation of each person or college throughout the life cycle is carried out to obtain detailed performance evaluation results for each stage.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of performance evaluation, and in particular relates to a performance evaluation system and method. Background Art

[0002] Performance evaluation refers to the comprehensive evaluation of the degree of achievement of the performance goals set by individuals, departments or units to achieve their functions, and the execution results of the budget arranged to achieve this goal, using certain evaluation methods, quantitative indicators and evaluation standards. The process of performance evaluation is the process of comparing the actual work performance of the object of performance evaluation with the work performance standards required to be achieved, as well as the process of quantitatively or qualitatively evaluating and giving feedback on the work performance of employees, and providing suggestions and directions for employees to improve and develop.

[0003] The process of performance evaluation is a systematic process, including setting goals and performance indicators, collecting and recording work performance data, conducting performance evaluation and analysis, providing performance feedback and suggestions, formulating performance improvement plans and performance incentives, etc. Performance evaluation can help the person being evaluated understand his or her work performance and status, provide opportunities and support for development and growth, and help organizational managers understand the work performance and status of the person being evaluated, and provide reference and support for the performance management and development of the organization.

[0004] The performance evaluation of colleges and universities is the performance evaluation of colleges and universities and their internal personnel or colleges. However, the existing college performance evaluation system or performance evaluation method is not specifically Figure 2 As shown in the figure, on the one hand, the performance evaluation is only conducted on a certain university personnel, and there is a lack of a comprehensive performance evaluation process for each university project, college and university itself, which leads to incomplete performance evaluation of universities and is not conducive to overall university performance management. On the other hand, the existing university performance evaluation system or performance evaluation method does not conduct a full life cycle performance evaluation for each personnel or project or college or school, and it is impossible to obtain detailed performance evaluation results for each stage.

[0005] Therefore, how to improve the existing performance evaluation system or method for colleges and universities to overcome the problem that the existing technology only conducts performance evaluation on a certain university personnel, lacks a comprehensive performance evaluation process for each university's projects, colleges and the university itself, resulting in incomplete performance evaluation of universities, which is not conducive to the overall performance management of universities. The existing university performance evaluation system or performance evaluation method does not conduct full life cycle performance evaluation for each personnel or college, and cannot obtain detailed performance evaluation results for each stage. This is a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently. Summary of the invention

[0006] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a performance evaluation system and method to overcome the technical problems in the prior art that performance evaluation is only conducted on personnel of a certain university, and there is a lack of a comprehensive performance evaluation process for projects, colleges and the university itself of each university, resulting in incomplete performance evaluation of the university, which is not conducive to the overall performance management of the university, and the existing university performance evaluation system or performance evaluation method does not conduct full life cycle performance evaluation for each personnel or each college, and cannot obtain detailed performance evaluation results for each stage.

[0007] In order to solve the above technical problems, the technical solution adopted by the present invention is as follows:

[0008] In a first aspect, a performance evaluation method is provided, comprising the following steps:

[0009] S1: creating a personal performance evaluation indicator data set, wherein the personal performance evaluation indicator data set includes various personal performance evaluation indicators, assigning a corresponding weight to each personal performance evaluation indicator, and reordering the various personal performance evaluation indicators in the personal performance evaluation indicator data set according to the size of the weight;

[0010] S2: assigning values ​​to each individual performance evaluation indicator in turn according to the ranking of each individual performance evaluation indicator, and calculating the performance evaluation value of each individual performance evaluation indicator based on the assigned values ​​and weights of each individual performance evaluation indicator, and at the same time calculating the total performance evaluation value of each person;

[0011] S3: Divide all people according to the projects they participate in, and extract the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' project-related individual performance evaluation indicators based on the projects. At the same time, assign corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' project-related individual performance evaluation indicators according to the importance of the work content undertaken by each person in the corresponding project;

[0012] S4: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each project based on the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' individual performance evaluation indicators related to the project and their corresponding weights;

[0013] S5: extracting the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college, and assigning values ​​to the various college performance evaluation indicators in the performance evaluation indicator data set of each college, and calculating the performance evaluation value of each college based on the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college and the assigned values ​​of the various college performance evaluation indicators;

[0014] S6: Extract the performance evaluation value of each college, and assign weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and calculate the performance evaluation value of each school based on the performance evaluation value of each college and the weights assigned to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college.

[0015] Preferably, the personal performance evaluation indicators in the personal performance evaluation indicator data set include teacher personal performance evaluation indicators and student personal performance evaluation indicators; teacher personal performance evaluation indicators include teaching indicators, project scientific research indicators, social service indicators and student guidance indicators; student personal performance evaluation indicators include project scientific research indicators and academic performance indicators of various subjects, wherein the project scientific research indicators include project progress indicators, project expenditure indicators and project achievement indicators.

[0016] Preferably, in step S1, the following specific process is included:

[0017] S11: Create a personal performance evaluation indicator dataset based on the teacher's personal performance evaluation indicator or the student's personal performance evaluation indicator;

[0018] S12: assign corresponding weights to each individual performance evaluation indicator according to the importance of each teacher's individual performance evaluation indicator or the importance of each student's individual performance evaluation indicator;

[0019] S13: re-arrange the individual performance evaluation indicators in the individual performance evaluation indicator data set according to the weights.

[0020] Preferably, step S12 includes the following specific process: The specific process of step S11 is: recording each individual performance evaluation indicator as I1, I2, I3, ... i ···I n , create a personal performance evaluation index data set {I1, I2, I3, ···I i ···I n};

[0021] The specific process of step S12 is: assign different weights W1, W2, W3, etc. to each individual performance evaluation indicator I1, I2, I3, etc. i ···W n , where the weight allocation standard is the importance of each individual performance evaluation indicator.

[0022] Preferably, the specific process of step S2 is as follows:

[0023] S21: Assign values ​​to each individual performance evaluation indicator in order according to the ranking of each individual performance evaluation indicator. The formula for assigning values ​​is S i =CR i *100, where S i Individual performance evaluation index I i The assignment of CR i Individual performance evaluation index I i The achievement rate of the current stage relative to the full score of 100;

[0024] S22: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each person's individual performance evaluation indicator based on the value and weight of each individual performance evaluation indicator, where the performance evaluation value S of a certain individual performance evaluation indicator of a person is pi =S i * W i , that is, S pi =W i *CR i *100;

[0025] S23: Calculate the total performance evaluation value of each person at the same time S = W1*CR1*100+ W2*CR2*100+ W3*CR3*100···+ W i *CR i *100+···+W n *CR n *100;

[0026] Among them, CR1 is the achievement rate of the current stage of the personal performance evaluation index I1 relative to the full score of 100 points, CR2 is the achievement rate of the current stage of the personal performance evaluation index I2 relative to the full score of 100 points, CR n Individual performance evaluation index I n The achievement rate of the current stage relative to the full score of 100.

[0027] Preferably, the specific process of step S3 is as follows:

[0028] S31: Divide all people according to the projects they participate in, extract the project-related personal performance evaluation indicators and their performance evaluation values ​​for the project participants, extract the project-related personal performance evaluation indicators I1, I2, I3, and the corresponding performance evaluation values ​​S p1 , S p2 , S p3 ;

[0029] S32: At the same time, the performance evaluation value S of project participants' project-related personal performance evaluation indicators I1, I2, and I3 is calculated according to the importance of the work content undertaken by each person in the corresponding project. p1 , S p2 , S p3 Assign the corresponding weight W p1 , W p2 , W p3 ;

[0030] The specific process of step S4 is as follows:

[0031] The performance evaluation value of each project is calculated based on the performance evaluation value of the project participants' project-related personal performance evaluation indicators and their corresponding weights. The performance evaluation value formula for a person in a project is as follows:

[0032] SP i = S p1 * W p1 +S p2 * W p2 +S p3 * W p3 ;

[0033] The final performance evaluation formula for a project is as follows:

[0034] SP=SP1+ SP2+ SP3+···+SP i +···+SP n ;

[0035] Among them, SP1 is the performance evaluation value of the first person in a certain project, SP2 is the performance evaluation value of the second person in a certain project, and SP3 is the performance evaluation value of the third person in a certain project. i For the i The performance evaluation value of a person in a project, SP n is the performance evaluation value of the nth person in a project.

[0036] Preferably, the specific process of step S5 is as follows:

[0037] S51: Extract the performance evaluation value SP of each project of a certain college p1 , SP p2 , SP p3 ···SP pi ···SP pn , calculate the project performance index I of a certain college c1 Performance evaluation value S c1 = SP p1 *W p1 +SP p2 *W p2 +SP p3 *W p3 + ···SP pi * W pi ···+ SP pn * W pn , W p1 is the weight of project P1, W p2 is the weight of project P2, W p3 is the weight of project P3, W pi is the weight of project Pi, W pn is the weight of project Pn;

[0038] S52: Create a performance evaluation indicator dataset for each college { I c1 ,I c2 ,I c3 ···I ci ···I cn};

[0039] S53: Assign values ​​to the performance evaluation indicators of other colleges in the performance evaluation indicator data set of a certain college, S c2 =CR c2 *100,S c3 = CR c3 *100,S ci = CR ci *100,S cn = CR cn *100, CR c2 For indicator I c2 Completion rate, CR c3 For indicator I c3 Completion rate, CR ci For indicator I ci Completion rate, CR cn For indicator I cn completion rate;

[0040] S54: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each college based on the performance evaluation value of the corresponding project of each college and the value assigned to each college performance evaluation indicator;

[0041] The performance evaluation formula of a certain college is:

[0042] SC=S c1 *W c1 + S c2 *W c2+ S c3 *W c3 +···+ S ci *W ci +···+ S cn *W cn ;

[0043] Among them, W c1 Project Performance Indicator I c1 The weight, W c2 Second Institute Performance Indicator I c2 The weight, W c3 The third college performance indicator I c3 The weight, W ci Performance indicator of the i-th college ci The weight, W cn nth Institute Performance Indicator I cn The weight of .

[0044] Preferably, step S6 includes the following specific steps:

[0045] S61: Extract the performance evaluation values ​​SC1, SC2, SC3, etc. of each college of a certain school i ···SC n ;

[0046] S62: Assign corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college: W SC1 , W SC2 , W SC3 ···W SCi ···W SCn ;

[0047] S63: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each school based on the performance evaluation value of each college and the weight assigned to the performance evaluation value of each college. The calculation formula for the performance evaluation value of a school is as follows:

[0048] Sy=SC1*W SC1 +SC2* W SC2 +SC3* W SC3 +···+SC i * W Sci+ ···+SC n * W SCn .

[0049] Preferably, after step S6, the following specific process is also included:

[0050] Create performance evaluation time nodes, and execute steps S2-S6 in a loop at each performance evaluation time node in turn, to achieve personal performance evaluation, project performance evaluation, college performance evaluation and school performance evaluation at each time node, and further achieve full life cycle performance evaluation of each person, project, college and school.

[0051] In a second aspect, a performance evaluation system is provided, which is used to implement any one of the performance evaluation methods described in any one of the above, and includes an indicator data set creation module, an evaluation indicator assignment module, a weight allocation module and a performance evaluation value calculation module, wherein the indicator data set creation module is connected to the evaluation indicator assignment module, the evaluation indicator assignment module is connected to the weight allocation module, and the weight allocation module is connected to the performance evaluation value calculation module;

[0052] The indicator data set creation module is used to create individual performance evaluation indicator data sets and performance evaluation indicator data sets for each college;

[0053] The evaluation index assignment module is used to assign values ​​to the individual performance evaluation index data sets and the various indicators in the performance evaluation index data sets of each college;

[0054] The weight allocation module is used to allocate weights to each indicator in the personal performance evaluation indicator data set and the performance evaluation indicator data set of each college;

[0055] The performance evaluation value calculation module is used to calculate the performance evaluation value of each individual performance evaluation indicator, the individual's total performance evaluation value, the performance evaluation value of each project, the performance evaluation value of each college and the performance evaluation value of each school.

[0056] The beneficial effects of the present invention include:

[0057] The performance evaluation system and method provided by the present invention create a personal performance evaluation indicator data set, and assign a corresponding weight to each personal performance evaluation indicator; assign values ​​to each personal performance evaluation indicator in sequence according to the ranking of each personal performance evaluation indicator, and calculate the total performance evaluation value of each person; divide all people according to the projects they participate in, and extract the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' personal performance evaluation indicators related to the projects based on the projects, and assign corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of the related personal performance evaluation indicators; calculate the performance evaluation values ​​of each project; extract the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college, and calculate the performance evaluation values ​​of each college; extract the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and assign weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and calculate the performance evaluation values ​​of each school based on the performance evaluation values ​​of each college and the weights assigned to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college.

[0058] First, by conducting performance evaluation on colleges and universities at each level, that is, conducting performance evaluation on individuals in the same time period, then conducting project performance evaluation based on the individual performance evaluation results, then conducting college performance evaluation based on the project performance evaluation results, and finally conducting school performance evaluation based on the college performance evaluation results, a vertical and comprehensive performance evaluation of colleges and universities is achieved.

[0059] Secondly, by re-arranging the performance evaluation indicators at each level according to the size of the weight, it is convenient for individuals, projects, colleges and schools to arrange work tasks according to the importance of each indicator. The relevant work tasks with high performance evaluation indicator weights should be arranged first, which will improve the orderliness of work arrangements and work efficiency at the same time.

[0060] Thirdly, individuals, projects, colleges and schools can make corresponding adjustments to their work based on their specific performance evaluation values, such as adjusting in the direction of their corresponding expertise, thereby optimizing the performance of individuals, projects, colleges and schools.

[0061] Finally, conducting performance evaluation throughout the entire life cycle of each person, project, college, and school will be beneficial to the overall performance management of colleges and universities, and detailed performance evaluation results can be obtained at each stage. At the same time, the performance evaluation results of each person, project, college, and school at each stage can be known. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0062] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the performance evaluation method of the present invention.

[0063] Figure 2 It is a structural diagram of a performance appraisal system in the prior art.

[0064] Figure 3 It is a schematic diagram of the structure of the performance appraisal system of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0065] The following is combined with Figure 1-Figure 3 The present invention is further described in detail:

[0066] See attached Figure 1 As shown, a performance evaluation method comprises the following steps:

[0067] S1: creating a personal performance evaluation indicator data set, wherein the personal performance evaluation indicator data set includes various personal performance evaluation indicators, assigning a corresponding weight to each personal performance evaluation indicator, and reordering the various personal performance evaluation indicators in the personal performance evaluation indicator data set according to the size of the weight;

[0068] S2: assigning values ​​to each individual performance evaluation indicator in turn according to the ranking of each individual performance evaluation indicator, and calculating the performance evaluation value of each individual performance evaluation indicator based on the assigned values ​​and weights of each individual performance evaluation indicator, and at the same time calculating the total performance evaluation value of each person;

[0069] S3: Divide all people according to the projects they participate in, and extract the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' project-related individual performance evaluation indicators based on the projects. At the same time, assign corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' project-related individual performance evaluation indicators according to the importance of the work content undertaken by each person in the corresponding project;

[0070] S4: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each project based on the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' individual performance evaluation indicators related to the project and their corresponding weights;

[0071] S5: extracting the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college, and assigning values ​​to the various college performance evaluation indicators in the performance evaluation indicator data set of each college, and calculating the performance evaluation value of each college based on the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college and the assigned values ​​of the various college performance evaluation indicators;

[0072] S6: Extract the performance evaluation value of each college, and assign weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and calculate the performance evaluation value of each school based on the performance evaluation value of each college and the weights assigned to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college.

[0073] The above performance evaluation method first creates a personal performance evaluation indicator data set, assigns corresponding weights to each personal performance evaluation indicator according to its corresponding importance, and re-sorts them according to the weights, that is, sorts different personal performance evaluation indicators according to their importance, so that the individuals who are being evaluated can intuitively understand the importance of the indicators in the performance evaluation, so as to arrange their work reasonably and ultimately maximize the performance evaluation results.

[0074] Then, each individual performance evaluation indicator is assigned a value in turn according to the ranking of each individual performance evaluation indicator. The process of assignment is the process of scoring each indicator of the individual being evaluated. At the same time, the performance evaluation value of each individual performance evaluation indicator is calculated based on the assignment and weight of each individual performance evaluation indicator, and the total performance evaluation value of each person is calculated at the same time. The total performance evaluation value of each person is the performance evaluation value of each stage. The individual being evaluated can upload the work results of each indicator in the system at each stage, and the system will assign the individual performance evaluation indicator according to the work results of each indicator. The individual being evaluated can understand the performance evaluation results of each stage in real time, and then optimize and adjust the work of the next stage, while promoting their own work progress and the improvement of their own abilities, and can promote the use of their own advantages.

[0075] Then, based on the project, the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' individual performance evaluation indicators related to the project are extracted, and at the same time, the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' individual performance evaluation indicators related to the project are assigned corresponding weights according to the importance of the work content undertaken by each person in the corresponding project. The performance evaluation value of each project is calculated based on the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' individual performance evaluation indicators related to the project and their corresponding weights. For colleges and universities, scientific research projects are very important and account for a large proportion of work for both teachers and students, and projects are completed based on multiple projects. Therefore, based on the aforementioned individual performance evaluation values, the performance evaluation values ​​of each project are calculated, and the individual project executors are adjusted according to the performance evaluation values ​​of each project to optimize the execution results of the project.

[0076] The personal performance evaluation indicators in the personal performance evaluation indicator data set include teacher personal performance evaluation indicators and student personal performance evaluation indicators; teacher personal performance evaluation indicators include teaching indicators, project scientific research indicators, social service indicators and student guidance indicators, and student personal performance evaluation indicators include project scientific research indicators and academic performance indicators of various subjects, among which the project scientific research indicators include project progress indicators, project expenditure indicators and project achievement indicators.

[0077] Then extract the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college, and assign values ​​to each college performance evaluation indicator in the performance evaluation indicator data set of each college. Calculate the performance evaluation value of each college based on the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college and the assigned values ​​of each college performance evaluation indicator. Teachers, students and others make up all the personnel of the college, so the personal performance evaluation values ​​of teachers and students determine the performance evaluation value of the college. According to the performance evaluation value of the college and the performance evaluation value of the individual, the executors of the project or other indicators can be adjusted to improve the performance evaluation value of the college.

[0078] Finally, the performance evaluation value of each college is extracted, and a weight is assigned to the performance evaluation value of each college. The performance evaluation value of each school is calculated based on the performance evaluation value of each college and the weight assigned to the performance evaluation value of each college to obtain the performance evaluation value of each school. Then the country or government can adjust the planning and allocation of the project according to the performance evaluation results to maximize the benefits.

[0079] That is, the performance evaluation process of the present invention realizes the vertical comprehensive performance evaluation of colleges and universities by performing performance evaluation on colleges and universities step by step, that is, in the same time stage, based on individual performance evaluation, then project performance evaluation, then college performance evaluation, and finally school performance evaluation. By re-ranking the performance evaluation indicators of each level according to the weight, it is convenient for individuals, projects, colleges and schools to arrange work tasks according to the importance of each indicator. First, the relevant work tasks with high weights of performance evaluation indicators are arranged to improve the orderliness of work arrangements and improve work efficiency. Individuals, projects, colleges and schools can make corresponding work adjustments according to their specific performance evaluation values, such as adjusting in the direction of their corresponding expertise, to achieve the optimization of individual, project, college and school performance. Performance evaluation of the whole life cycle is carried out for each person, project, college and school, which is beneficial to the overall college performance management, and detailed performance evaluation results can be obtained at each stage, and the performance evaluation results of each person, project, college and school at each stage can be known.

[0080] In the above scheme, in step S1, the following specific processes are included:

[0081] S11: Create a personal performance evaluation indicator dataset based on the teacher's personal performance evaluation indicator or the student's personal performance evaluation indicator;

[0082] S12: assign corresponding weights to each individual performance evaluation indicator according to the importance of each teacher's individual performance evaluation indicator or the importance of each student's individual performance evaluation indicator;

[0083] S13: re-arrange the individual performance evaluation indicators in the individual performance evaluation indicator data set according to the weights.

[0084] Step S12 includes the following specific process: The specific process of step S11 is: record each individual performance evaluation indicator as I1, I2, I3, ... i ···I n , create a personal performance evaluation index data set {I1, I2, I3, ···I i ···I n The specific process of step S12 is: assign different weights W1, W2, W3, etc. to each individual performance evaluation indicator I1, I2, I3, etc. i ···W n , where the weight distribution standard is the importance of each individual performance evaluation indicator. Through the above process, the creation of individual performance evaluation indicators and the weight distribution corresponding to each indicator are realized, providing a data basis for subsequent calculations.

[0085] The specific process of step S2 is as follows:

[0086] S21: Assign values ​​to each individual performance evaluation indicator in order according to the ranking of each individual performance evaluation indicator. The formula for assigning values ​​is S i =CR i *100, where S i Individual performance evaluation index I i The assignment of CR i Individual performance evaluation index I i The achievement rate of the current stage relative to the full score of 100;

[0087] S22: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each person's individual performance evaluation indicator based on the value and weight of each individual performance evaluation indicator, where the performance evaluation value S of a certain individual performance evaluation indicator of a person is pi =S i * W i , that is, S pi =W i *CR i *100;

[0088] S23: Calculate the total performance evaluation value of each person at the same time S = W1*CR1*100+ W2*CR2*100+ W3*CR3*100···+ W i *CR i *100+···+W n *CR n *100;

[0089] Among them, CR1 is the achievement rate of the current stage of the personal performance evaluation index I1 relative to the full score of 100 points, CR2 is the achievement rate of the current stage of the personal performance evaluation index I2 relative to the full score of 100 points, CRn Individual performance evaluation index I n The achievement rate of the current stage relative to the full score of 100.

[0090] The specific process of step S3 is as follows:

[0091] S31: Divide all people according to the projects they participate in, extract the project-related personal performance evaluation indicators and their performance evaluation values ​​for the project participants, extract the project-related personal performance evaluation indicators I1, I2, I3, and the corresponding performance evaluation values ​​S p1 , S p2 , S p3 ;

[0092] S32: At the same time, the performance evaluation value S of project participants' project-related personal performance evaluation indicators I1, I2, and I3 is calculated according to the importance of the work content undertaken by each person in the corresponding project. p1 , S p2 , S p3 Assign the corresponding weight W p1 , W p2 , W p3 .

[0093] The specific process of step S4 is as follows:

[0094] The performance evaluation value of each project is calculated based on the performance evaluation value of the project participants' project-related personal performance evaluation indicators and their corresponding weights. The performance evaluation value formula for a person in a project is as follows:

[0095] SP i = S p1 * W p1 +S p2 * W p2 +S p3 * W p3 ;

[0096] The final performance evaluation formula for a project is as follows:

[0097] SP=SP1+ SP2+ SP3+···+SP i +···+SP n ;

[0098] Among them, SP1 is the performance evaluation value of the first person in a certain project, SP2 is the performance evaluation value of the second person in a certain project, and SP3 is the performance evaluation value of the third person in a certain project. i For the i The performance evaluation value of a person in a project, SP n is the performance evaluation value of the nth person in a project.

[0099] The specific process of step S5 is as follows:

[0100] S51: Extract the performance evaluation value SP of each project of a certain college p1 , SP p2 , SP p3 ···SP pi ···SP pn , calculate the project performance index I of a certain college c1 Performance evaluation value S c1 = SP p1 *W p1 +SP p2 *W p2 +SP p3 *W p3 + ···SP pi * W pi ···+ SP pn * W pn , W p1 is the weight of project P1, W p2 is the weight of project P2, W p3 is the weight of project P3, W pi is the weight of project Pi, W pn is the weight of project Pn;

[0101] S52: Create a performance evaluation indicator dataset for each college { I c1 ,I c2 ,I c3 ···I ci ···I cn};

[0102] S53: Assign values ​​to the performance evaluation indicators of other colleges in the performance evaluation indicator data set of a certain college, S c2 =CR c2 *100,S c3 = CR c3 *100,S ci = CR ci *100,S cn = CR cn *100, CR c2 For indicator I c2 Completion rate, CR c3 For indicator I c3 Completion rate, CR ci For indicator I ci Completion rate, CR cn For indicator I cn completion rate;

[0103] S54: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each college based on the performance evaluation value of the corresponding project of each college and the assigned value of each college performance evaluation indicator.

[0104] The performance evaluation formula of a certain college is:

[0105] SC=S c1 *W c1 + S c2 *W c2+ S c3 *W c3 +···+ S ci *W ci +···+ S cn *W cn ;

[0106] Among them, W c1 Project Performance Indicator I c1 The weight, W c2 Second Institute Performance Indicator I c2 The weight, W c3 The third college performance indicator I c3 The weight, W ci Performance indicator of the i-th college ci The weight, W cn nth Institute Performance Indicator I cn The weight of .

[0107] Step S6 includes the following specific steps:

[0108] S61: Extract the performance evaluation values ​​SC1, SC2, SC3, etc. of each college of a certain school i ···SC n ;

[0109] S62: Assign corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college: W SC1 , W SC2 , W SC3 ···W SCi ···W SCn ;

[0110] S63: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each school based on the performance evaluation value of each college and the weight assigned to the performance evaluation value of each college. The calculation formula for the performance evaluation value of a school is as follows:

[0111] Sy=SC1*W SC1 +SC2* W SC2 +SC3* W SC3 +···+SC i * W Sci+ ···+SC n * WSCn .

[0112] The above performance evaluation method reorders the performance evaluation indicators at each level according to the weight, so that individuals, projects, colleges and schools can arrange their work according to the degree of importance. It promotes individuals, projects, colleges and schools to make corresponding work adjustments according to their specific performance evaluation values, such as adjusting in the direction of their corresponding expertise, to achieve the optimization of individual, project, college and school performance. The performance evaluation of each person or college throughout the life cycle is conducive to the overall and various stages of university performance management, and can obtain detailed performance evaluation results at each stage, so as to facilitate real-time adjustment and optimization of various tasks.

[0113] In another embodiment, the following specific process is also included after step S6: creating a performance evaluation time node, and executing steps S2-S6 in a loop at each performance evaluation time node in turn, to achieve personal performance evaluation, project performance evaluation, college performance evaluation and school performance evaluation at each time node, thereby achieving full life cycle performance evaluation of each person, project, college and school.

[0114] See also Figure 3 A performance evaluation system is provided with multi-level performance evaluation, including individual performance evaluation, project performance evaluation, college performance evaluation and school performance evaluation. Each level of performance evaluation includes an indicator data set creation module, an evaluation indicator value assignment module, a weight distribution module and a performance evaluation value calculation module, wherein the indicator data set creation module is connected to the evaluation indicator value assignment module, the evaluation indicator value assignment module is connected to the weight distribution module, and the weight distribution module is connected to the performance evaluation value calculation module.

[0115] The indicator data set creation module is used to create individual performance evaluation indicator data sets and performance evaluation indicator data sets for each college. The evaluation indicator assignment module is used to assign values ​​to the individual indicators in the individual performance evaluation indicator data sets and the performance evaluation indicator data sets for each college. The weight allocation module is used to assign weights to the individual indicators in the individual performance evaluation indicator data sets and the performance evaluation indicator data sets for each college. The performance evaluation value calculation module is used to calculate the performance evaluation values ​​of each individual performance evaluation indicator, the individual's total performance evaluation value, the performance evaluation values ​​of each project, the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and the performance evaluation values ​​of each school.

[0116] See also Figure 2It can be seen from the performance evaluation system in the prior art that it sets up multiple evaluation stages, and sets multiple performance evaluation indicators in each stage, such as monthly performance evaluation including economic indicator evaluation, work plan evaluation, and management indicator evaluation, among which the work plan evaluation includes the monthly target plan, and the semi-annual job quality evaluation includes professional skills, management responsibility, public responsibility and professional behavior quality. It also includes the annual performance review. On the one hand, the performance evaluation system is not comprehensive in terms of time, and there is no way to obtain the performance evaluation results at other time points except monthly, semi-annual and annual end, and because the three time nodes of monthly, semi-annual and annual end evaluate different indicators, the evaluation results of each stage are not continuous. The performance evaluation system provided by the present invention, on the one hand, can achieve the performance evaluation results of individuals, projects, colleges and schools at each time point, and thus can achieve continuous performance evaluation of individuals, projects, colleges and schools. Secondly, since multiple performance evaluation objects for individuals, projects, colleges and schools are set up, comprehensive coverage of performance evaluation of all aspects of colleges and universities is provided, providing a data basis for the distribution of national projects among schools, the distribution of projects allocated to schools among colleges, and the distribution of projects allocated to colleges among personnel, thereby giving full play to individuals, colleges and schools, and being more conducive to the research of various projects.

[0117] In summary, the performance evaluation system and method provided by the present invention first create a personal performance evaluation indicator data set, and assign a corresponding weight to each personal performance evaluation indicator; assign values ​​to each personal performance evaluation indicator in turn according to the ranking of each personal performance evaluation indicator, and calculate the total performance evaluation value of each person; divide all people according to the projects they participate in, and extract the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' personal performance evaluation indicators related to the project based on the project, and assign corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of the relevant personal performance evaluation indicators; calculate the performance evaluation value of each project; extract the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college, and calculate the performance evaluation value of each college; extract the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and assign weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and calculate the performance evaluation value of each school based on the performance evaluation values ​​of each college and the weights assigned to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college.

[0118] First, by conducting performance evaluation of colleges and universities step by step, that is, in the same period of time, based on individual performance evaluation, then project performance evaluation, then college performance evaluation, and finally school performance evaluation, a vertical and comprehensive performance evaluation of colleges and universities is achieved. By re-arranging the performance evaluation indicators at each level according to the weight, it is convenient for individuals, projects, colleges and schools to arrange work tasks according to the importance of each indicator. First, the relevant work tasks with high weights of performance evaluation indicators are arranged to improve the orderliness of work arrangements and work efficiency. Individuals, projects, colleges and schools can make corresponding work adjustments according to their specific performance evaluation values, such as adjusting in the direction of their corresponding expertise, to achieve the optimization of individual, project, college and school performance. The performance evaluation of each person, project, college and school throughout the life cycle is conducive to the overall performance management of colleges and universities, and can obtain detailed performance evaluation results at each stage. At the same time, the performance evaluation results of each person, project, college and school at each stage can be known.

Claims

1. A performance evaluation method, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: S1: creating a personal performance evaluation indicator data set, wherein the personal performance evaluation indicator data set includes various personal performance evaluation indicators, assigning a corresponding weight to each personal performance evaluation indicator, and reordering the various personal performance evaluation indicators in the personal performance evaluation indicator data set according to the size of the weight; S2: assigning values ​​to each individual performance evaluation indicator in turn according to the ranking of each individual performance evaluation indicator, and calculating the performance evaluation value of each individual performance evaluation indicator based on the assigned values ​​and weights of each individual performance evaluation indicator, and at the same time calculating the total performance evaluation value of each person; S3: Divide all people according to the projects they participate in, and extract the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' project-related individual performance evaluation indicators based on the projects. At the same time, assign corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' project-related individual performance evaluation indicators according to the importance of the work content undertaken by each person in the corresponding project; S4: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each project based on the performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants' individual performance evaluation indicators related to the project and their corresponding weights; S5: extracting the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college, and assigning values ​​to the various college performance evaluation indicators in the performance evaluation indicator data set of each college, and calculating the performance evaluation value of each college based on the performance evaluation values ​​of the corresponding projects of each college and the assigned values ​​of the various college performance evaluation indicators; S6: extracting the performance evaluation value of each college, assigning weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college, and calculating the performance evaluation value of each school based on the performance evaluation value of each college and the weights assigned to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college; In step S1, the following specific processes are included: S11: Create a personal performance evaluation indicator dataset based on the teacher's personal performance evaluation indicator or the student's personal performance evaluation indicator; S12: assign corresponding weights to each individual performance evaluation indicator according to the importance of each teacher's individual performance evaluation indicator or the importance of each student's individual performance evaluation indicator; S13: re-ranking the individual performance evaluation indicators in the individual performance evaluation indicator data set according to the weights; The specific process of step S11 is: record each individual performance evaluation indicator as I1, I2, I3, ... i ···I n , create a personal performance evaluation index data set {I1, I2, I3, ···I i ···I n }; The specific process of step S12 is: assign different weights W1, W2, W3, etc. to each individual performance evaluation indicator I1, I2, I3, etc. i ···W n , where the weight allocation standard is the importance of each individual performance evaluation indicator; The specific process of step S2 is as follows: S21: Assign values ​​to each individual performance evaluation indicator in order according to the ranking of each individual performance evaluation indicator. The formula for assigning values ​​is S i =CR i *100, where S i Individual performance evaluation index I i The assignment of CR i Individual performance evaluation index I i The achievement rate of the current stage relative to the full score of 100; S22: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each person's individual performance evaluation indicator based on the value and weight of each individual performance evaluation indicator, where the performance evaluation value S of a certain individual performance evaluation indicator of a person is pi =S i * W i , that is, S pi = W i *CR i *100; S23: Calculate the total performance evaluation value of each person at the same time S = W1*CR1*100+ W2*CR2*100+ W3*CR3*100···+ W i *CR i *100+···+ W n *CR n *100; Among them, CR1 is the achievement rate of the current stage of the personal performance evaluation index I1 relative to the full score of 100 points, CR2 is the achievement rate of the current stage of the personal performance evaluation index I2 relative to the full score of 100 points, CR n Individual performance evaluation index I n The achievement rate of the current stage relative to the full score of 100; The specific process of step S3 is as follows: S31: Divide all people according to the projects of the performance evaluation indicator data set, extract the project-related personal performance evaluation indicators and their performance evaluation values ​​of the project participants, extract the project-related personal performance evaluation indicators I1, I2, I3, and the corresponding performance evaluation values ​​S p1 , S p2 , S p3 ; S32: At the same time, the performance evaluation value S of project participants' project-related personal performance evaluation indicators I1, I2, and I3 is calculated according to the importance of the work content undertaken by each person in the corresponding project. p1 , S p2 , S p3 Assign the corresponding weight W p1 , W p2 , W p3 ; The specific process of step S4 is as follows: The performance evaluation value of each project is calculated based on the performance evaluation value of the project participants' project-related personal performance evaluation indicators and their corresponding weights. The performance evaluation value formula for a person in a project is as follows: SP i = S p1 * W p1 +S p2 * W p2 +S p3 * W p3 ; The final performance evaluation formula for a project is as follows: SP=SP1+ SP2+ SP3+···+SP i +···+SP n ; Among them, SP1 is the performance evaluation value of the first person in a certain project, SP2 is the performance evaluation value of the second person in a certain project, and SP3 is the performance evaluation value of the third person in a certain project. i For the i The performance evaluation value of a person in a project, SP n is the performance evaluation value of the nth person in a project; The specific process of step S5 is as follows: S51: Extract the performance evaluation value SP of each project of a certain college p1 , SP p2 , SP p3 ···SP pi ···SP pn , calculate the project performance index I of a certain college c1 Performance evaluation value S c1 = SP p1 *W p1 +SP p2 *W p2 +SP p3 *W p3 + ···SP pi *W pi ···+ SP pn * W pn , W p1 is the weight of project P1, W p2 is the weight of project P2, W p3 is the weight of project P3, W pi is the weight of project Pi, W pn is the weight of project Pn; S52: Create a performance evaluation indicator dataset for each college { I c1 ,I c2 ,I c3 ···I ci ···I cn }; S53: Assign values ​​to the performance evaluation indicators of other colleges in the performance evaluation indicator data set of a certain college, S c2 = CR c2 *100,S c3 = CR c3 *100,S ci = CR ci *100,S cn = CR cn *100, CR c2 For indicator I c2 Completion rate, CR c3 For indicator I c3 Completion rate, CR ci For indicator I ci Completion rate, CR cn For indicator I cn completion rate; S54: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each college based on the performance evaluation value of the corresponding project of each college and the value assigned to each college performance evaluation indicator; The performance evaluation formula of a certain college is: SC= S c1 *W c1 + S c2 *W c2+ S c3 *W c3 +···+ S ci *W ci +···+ S cn *W cn ; Among them, W c1 Project Performance Indicator I c1 The weight, W c2 Second Institute Performance Indicator I c2 The weight, W c3 The third college performance indicator I c3 The weight, W ci Performance indicator of the i-th college ci The weight, W cn nth Institute Performance Indicator I cn The weight of Step S6 includes the following specific steps: S61: Extract the performance evaluation values ​​SC1, SC2, SC3, etc. of each college of a certain school i ···SC n ; S62: Assign corresponding weights to the performance evaluation values ​​of each college: W SC1 , W SC2 , W SC3 ···W SCi ···W SCn ; S63: Calculate the performance evaluation value of each school based on the performance evaluation value of each college and the weight assigned to the performance evaluation value of each college. The calculation formula for the performance evaluation value of a school is as follows: Sy=SC1* In SC1 +SC2* In SC2 +SC3* In SC3 +···+SC i * IN Sci+ ···+SC n * IN SCn 。 2. A performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The personal performance evaluation indicators for teachers include teaching indicators, project scientific research indicators, social service indicators and student guidance indicators. The personal performance evaluation indicators for students include project scientific research indicators and academic performance indicators for each subject. Among them, the project scientific research indicators include project progress indicators, project expenditure indicators and project achievement indicators.

3. A performance evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: After step S6, the following specific process is also included: Create performance evaluation time nodes, and execute steps S2-S6 in a loop at each performance evaluation time node in turn to achieve personal performance evaluation, project performance evaluation, college performance evaluation and school performance evaluation at each time node.

4. A performance evaluation system, used to implement a performance evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that: It includes an indicator data set creation module, an evaluation indicator assignment module, a weight distribution module and a performance evaluation value calculation module, wherein the indicator data set creation module is connected to the evaluation indicator assignment module, the evaluation indicator assignment module is connected to the weight distribution module, and the weight distribution module is connected to the performance evaluation value calculation module; The indicator data set creation module is used to create individual performance evaluation indicator data sets and performance evaluation indicator data sets for each college; The evaluation index assignment module is used to assign values ​​to the individual performance evaluation index data sets and the various indicators in the performance evaluation index data sets of each college; The weight allocation module is used to allocate weights to each indicator in the individual performance evaluation indicator data set and the performance evaluation indicator data set of each college; The performance evaluation value calculation module is used to calculate the performance evaluation value of each individual performance evaluation indicator, the individual's total performance evaluation value, the performance evaluation value of each project, the performance evaluation value of each college and the performance evaluation value of each school.

Images