Construction drawing auditing system and construction drawing auditing method
Through online communication and automated processing of the construction drawing review system, the problems of long and low efficiency of manual communication are solved, and an efficient review process is realized to ensure the smooth progress of the project progress.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411340722.1
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-09-25
- Publication Date
- 2024-12-24
AI Technical Summary
During the review of existing construction drawings, manual communication is required, which leads to long-term, low efficiency, easy to cause omissions, and affects the progress of the project construction.
Design a construction drawing review system, including drawing acquisition module, drawing review module, document generation module, document transmission module, data comparison module and data association module, realize online communication, automatically record review opinions, and generate preset template documents. Transfer and compare reply documents to ensure they are associated with the preset database.
It improves the communication efficiency between the design unit and the auditing unit, avoids omissions caused by manual round-trip communication, ensures the smooth progress of the project progress, and improves the overall audit efficiency.
Smart Images

Figure CN119180613A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of drawing review, and more specifically, to a construction drawing review system and a construction drawing review method. Background Art
[0002] Drawings used in the field of construction need to be delivered to relevant review units for review. During the review, the reviewer needs to compare the drawing model with the corresponding drawing to determine whether the two are consistent. If they are consistent, they can pass the review. If they are inconsistent, the corresponding information will be fed back to the delivery party.
[0003] In the prior art, after receiving the construction drawings and related materials to be reviewed, the review unit manually assigns them to different reviewers for review, collects the review results and then feeds them back to the design unit. The design unit responds and modifies the review results, and the review opinions in the review results are closed-loop processed one by one through round-trip communication between the review unit and the design unit.
[0004] However, during the current review process of construction drawings, the design unit and the review unit need to communicate and check the progress of the project review, and confirm the review opinions. It can be seen that the current review process of construction drawings has many drawbacks, such as many links, many steps, slow speed, long time, high possibility of human errors and low efficiency. This has brought great inconvenience to the drawing review unit, design unit, review experts and construction unit, and affected the progress of engineering construction. Summary of the invention
[0005] In response to at least one defect or improvement need in the prior art, the present invention provides a construction drawing review system and a construction drawing review method, which are used to solve the problems in the prior art that construction drawings require continuous manual communication, which is time-consuming, affects the progress of project construction, and is prone to high possibility of errors and low efficiency.
[0006] To achieve the above-mentioned object, according to a first aspect of the present invention, a construction drawing review system is provided, comprising: a drawing acquisition module, a drawing review module, a document generation module, a document transmission module, a data comparison module and a data association module; the drawing acquisition module, the drawing review module, the document generation module, the document transmission module, the data comparison module and the data association module are connected in sequence; the data association module is also connected to the drawing review module;
[0007] Among them, the drawing acquisition module is used to convert the uploaded construction drawing into drawing data in a preset format;
[0008] The drawing review module is used to determine the reviewers and record their review opinions;
[0009] The document generation module is used to generate a preset template document based on the drawing data and review opinions in a preset format;
[0010] The document transmission module is used to transmit the preset template document to the design unit, and transmit the design unit's reply document to the reviewer;
[0011] The data comparison module is used to compare the identification code of the reply document with the preset database, obtain the reply document that meets the system preset identification code and send it to the data association module;
[0012] The data association module is used to associate the reply document with the corresponding drawing data and review opinions in a preset format.
[0013] In a possible implementation, the drawing acquisition module further includes: a drawing verification unit, a data parsing unit and a data detection unit; the drawing verification unit, the data parsing unit and the data detection unit are connected in sequence;
[0014] Among them, the drawing verification unit is used to perform form verification on the uploaded construction drawing and obtain the construction drawing data that meets the requirements of the construction drawing review system;
[0015] The data parsing unit is used to parse the construction drawing data to obtain drawing data in a preset format;
[0016] The data detection unit is used to verify the drawing data in a preset format, and store the drawing data in the preset format that has passed the verification into a preset database.
[0017] In a possible implementation, the drawing review module further includes: a task allocation unit, a work point creation unit, and a problem recording unit; the task allocation unit, the work point creation unit, and the problem recording unit are connected in sequence;
[0018] The task allocation unit is used to send the drawing data in a preset format to the corresponding auditor after the auditor receives the audit task;
[0019] The work point creation unit is used to establish a drawing work point according to drawing data in a preset format, and associate the drawing data corresponding to the drawing work point;
[0020] The problem recording unit is used to record the review personnel's review issues on the drawing work points into the preset database.
[0021] In a possible implementation, the data comparison module further includes: a document parsing unit and an identification code comparison unit; the document parsing unit is connected to the identification code comparison unit;
[0022] The document parsing unit is used to parse the reply document and obtain the identification code verified by the construction drawing review system;
[0023] The identification code comparison unit is used to compare the parsed reply document with the corresponding drawing data in the preset database to obtain the reply document that meets the system preset identification code.
[0024] In a possible implementation, it further includes: a display module; the display module is connected to the drawing review module;
[0025] The display module is used to query target data from a preset database and display the target data.
[0026] In a second aspect, the present invention further provides a method for reviewing construction drawings, comprising:
[0027] Convert the uploaded construction drawings into drawing data in a preset format;
[0028] Determine the auditors and record their audit opinions;
[0029] Generate preset template documents based on drawing data and review comments in preset formats;
[0030] Transmit the preset template document to the design unit, and transmit the design unit's response document to the reviewer;
[0031] Compare the identification code of the reply document with the preset database to obtain the reply document that matches the system preset identification code;
[0032] The reply document is associated with the corresponding drawing data and review opinions in the preset format.
[0033] In a possible implementation, the uploaded construction drawing is converted into drawing data in a preset format, including:
[0034] Perform form verification on the uploaded construction drawings to obtain construction drawing data that meets the requirements of the construction drawing review system;
[0035] Parse the construction drawing data to obtain drawing data in a preset format;
[0036] The drawing data in a preset format are verified, and the drawing data in the preset format that pass the verification are stored in a preset database.
[0037] In a possible implementation, the auditor is identified and the auditor's audit opinion is recorded, including:
[0038] After the auditor receives the audit task, the drawing data in the preset format is sent to the corresponding auditor;
[0039] Establish drawing work points according to drawing data in a preset format, and associate drawing data corresponding to the drawing work points;
[0040] The review issues raised by the reviewers on the drawing work points are recorded in the preset database.
[0041] In a possible implementation, comparing the identification code of the reply document with a preset database to obtain a reply document that matches the system preset identification code includes:
[0042] Parse the reply document and obtain the identification code verified by the construction drawing review system;
[0043] The parsed reply document is compared with the corresponding drawing data in the preset database to obtain the reply document that meets the system preset identification code.
[0044] In a possible implementation manner, the method further includes: querying target data from a preset database and displaying the target data.
[0045] In general, the above technical solutions conceived by the present invention can achieve the following beneficial effects compared with the prior art:
[0046] A construction drawing review system provided by the present invention is composed of a drawing acquisition module, a drawing review module, a document generation module, a document transmission module, a data comparison module and a data association module connected in sequence, wherein the data association module is also connected to the drawing review module. The construction drawing review system composed in this way utilizes the layout form of the components of each module in the overall system and the mutual connection and interaction relationship of each component to realize the online communication of the personnel of the review unit and the design unit on the construction drawing. After the construction drawing is uploaded to the system through the drawing acquisition module, it is assigned to the personnel of the corresponding review unit by the drawing review module, and after the reviewer conducts the review, the reviewer's review opinion is automatically recorded, avoiding manual If any errors occur during the operation, the document generation module will generate a preset template document, which will be sent to the designer's unified receiving end using the document transmission module to facilitate unified review by the designer, thereby improving the efficiency of communication between the two parties. After the designer replies, the data comparison module will be used to compare the reply document with the preset database to ensure that the content of the reply document is associated with the construction drawings in the preset database. Finally, the data association module will be used to associate the successfully compared reply document with the corresponding drawing data and review opinions in the preset format, and unified management of related materials of the same construction drawing will be carried out to avoid manual communication and the possibility of errors, thereby avoiding delays in project progress and improving overall efficiency. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0047] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, the drawings required for use in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.
[0048] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of a construction drawing review system provided by the present invention;
[0049] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of a drawing acquisition module provided by the present invention;
[0050] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of a drawing review module provided by the present invention;
[0051] Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of a data comparison module provided by the present invention;
[0052] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of a process flow of an embodiment of a method for reviewing construction drawings provided by the present invention;
[0053] Figure 6 The present invention provides Figure 5 A schematic diagram of a flow chart of an embodiment of step S100;
[0054] Figure 7 The present invention provides Figure 5 Schematic diagram of a flow chart of an embodiment of step S200. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0055] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more clearly understood, the present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention. In addition, the technical features involved in the various embodiments of the present invention described below can be combined with each other as long as they do not conflict with each other.
[0056] The terms "first", "second", "third", etc. in the specification and claims of this application and the above-mentioned drawings are used to distinguish different objects, rather than to describe a specific order. In addition, the terms "including" and "having" and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, system, product or device that includes a series of steps or units is not limited to the listed steps or units, but optionally includes steps or units that are not listed, or optionally includes other steps or units inherent to these processes, methods, products or devices.
[0057] The present invention provides a construction drawing review system and a construction drawing review method, which are respectively described below.
[0058] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of a construction drawing review system provided by the present invention. In a specific embodiment of the present invention, a construction drawing review system 100 is disclosed, including: a drawing acquisition module 110, a drawing review module 120, a document generation module 130, a document transmission module 140, a data comparison module 150 and a data association module 160; the drawing acquisition module 110, the drawing review module 120, the document generation module 130, the document transmission module 140, the data comparison module 150 and the data association module 160 are connected in sequence; the data association module 160 is also connected to the drawing review module 120;
[0059] The drawing acquisition module 110 is used to convert the uploaded construction drawing into drawing data in a preset format;
[0060] The drawing review module 120 is used to determine the reviewer and record the reviewer's review opinion;
[0061] The document generation module 130 is used to generate a preset template document according to the drawing data and review opinions in a preset format;
[0062] The document transmission module 140 is used to transmit the preset template document to the design unit, and transmit the design unit's reply document to the reviewer;
[0063] The data comparison module 150 is used to compare the identification code of the reply document with the preset database, obtain the reply document that matches the system preset identification code and send it to the data association module 160;
[0064] The data association module 160 is used to associate the reply document with the corresponding drawing data and review opinions in a preset format.
[0065] In the above embodiment, the drawing acquisition module 110 is a key component in the system, and its main function is to convert the construction drawings uploaded by the user to ensure that these drawings can be correctly recognized and processed by the system. This module supports the input of multiple original drawing formats, such as CAD, PDF, etc., and converts them into a system preset format, such as a specific XML or JSON format, through a built-in format converter, so as to facilitate the efficient use of subsequent modules.
[0066] The drawing review module 120 is responsible for the management of the review process. It first determines the reviewer based on the type, content, project requirements or user designation of the drawing, and then sends the review task to the reviewer through the system. The reviewer can view the drawing data in the system and enter their review opinions. These opinions include but are not limited to evaluations of the compliance, accuracy, completeness, etc. of the drawings, as well as suggestions for possible modifications. The system records and saves all review opinions to provide reference for subsequent document generation and modification.
[0067] The document generation module 130 automatically generates preset template documents based on drawing data and review comments. It fills in drawing data and review comments based on the system's built-in or user-defined document templates to generate documents that meet specific formats and requirements. These documents may include the final version of the construction drawing, review reports, summary of modification suggestions, etc., aiming to provide clear and accurate guidance for subsequent design and construction.
[0068] The document transmission module 140 is responsible for transmitting documents between the system and the outside. On the one hand, it sends the generated preset template documents to the design unit to ensure that the design unit can obtain the latest drawings and review information in a timely manner; on the other hand, it is also responsible for receiving the documents replied by the design unit, such as modified drawings, supplementary instructions, etc., and transmits these reply documents to the corresponding reviewers for further review or confirmation.
[0069] After receiving the reply document from the design unit, the data comparison module 150 performs an important verification step. It verifies the authenticity and validity of the reply document by extracting the identification code in the reply document and comparing it with the identification code in the preset database. Only reply documents that match the system preset identification code will be further processed, which helps prevent erroneous or unauthorized documents from entering the system flow.
[0070] Finally, the data association module 160 is responsible for associating the verified response documents with their corresponding preset format drawing data and review opinions. This step ensures the integrity and consistency of all relevant information, allowing users or systems to easily track and view the entire review and modification history of a specific drawing, greatly improving the efficiency and accuracy of project management.
[0071] It should be noted that the drawing review module 120 saves the construction drawing files as a drawing category set according to the drawing category entered when uploading, and then sends other information when the drawings are uploaded to the cloud server to generate a drawing category database; the drawing categories include drawings, design specifications, interfaces, quantity verification, structural verification, design principles, etc.
[0072] Compared with the prior art, the present embodiment provides a construction drawing review system 100, which is composed of a drawing acquisition module 110, a drawing review module 120, a document generation module 130, a document transmission module 140, a data comparison module 150 and a data association module 160 connected in sequence, wherein the data association module 160 is also connected to the drawing review module 120. The construction drawing review system 100 composed in this way utilizes the layout form of each module device in the overall system and the mutual connection and interaction relationship of each device to realize the online communication of the personnel of the review unit and the design unit on the construction drawing. After the construction drawing is uploaded to the system through the drawing acquisition module 110, it is assigned to the personnel of the corresponding review unit by the drawing review module 120, and is automatically recorded after the reviewer reviews it. The reviewer's review opinions are recorded to avoid omissions in the manual operation process, and then a preset template document is generated through the document generation module 130, and sent to the unified receiving end of the designer through the document transmission module 140, so as to facilitate the unified review by the designer, thereby improving the efficiency of communication between the two parties. After the designer replies, the reply document is compared with the preset database through the data comparison module 150 to ensure that the content of the reply document is associated with the construction drawings in the preset database. Finally, the successfully compared reply document is associated with the corresponding drawing data and review opinions in the preset format through the data association module 160, and the related materials of the same construction drawing are uniformly managed to avoid the possibility of manual communication and omissions, avoid delays in project progress, and improve overall efficiency.
[0073] See also Figure 2 , Figure 2 This is a structural schematic diagram of an embodiment of a drawing acquisition module provided by the present invention. In some embodiments of the present invention, the drawing acquisition module 110 further includes: a drawing verification unit 111, a data parsing unit 112 and a data detection unit 113; the drawing verification unit 111, the data parsing unit 112 and the data detection unit 113 are connected in sequence;
[0074] Among them, the drawing verification unit 111 is used to perform form verification on the uploaded construction drawing drawings to obtain construction drawing data that meets the requirements of the construction drawing review system 100;
[0075] The data parsing unit 112 is used to parse the construction drawing data to obtain drawing data in a preset format;
[0076] The data detection unit 113 is used to verify the drawing data in a preset format, and store the verified drawing data in the preset format into a preset database.
[0077] In the above embodiment, first of all, the drawing verification unit 111 is the starting point of the whole process. It undertakes the important task of preliminary screening and reviewing the uploaded construction drawings. Through a series of strict form verification methods, the unit can effectively identify those high-quality data that meet the requirements of the construction drawing review system 100, laying a solid foundation for subsequent data processing. It should be noted that meeting the requirements of the construction drawing review system 100 means meeting the reading requirements of the system, ensuring that the input drawing data can be successfully read by the construction drawing review system 100.
[0078] Then, the data parsing unit 112 starts to perform in-depth parsing of the verified and screened construction drawing data. This step is crucial because it requires converting the original construction drawing data into a preset, more standardized and structured format. This format conversion not only helps to improve the readability and processability of the data, but also provides great convenience for subsequent data verification and storage. As a preferred embodiment, the preset format in the present invention is a JSON data format that the system can process.
[0079] Finally, the data detection unit 113 is responsible for the final verification of the drawing data that has been converted into the preset format. This step is to ensure that all data stored in the preset database is accurate and in compliance with the specifications, and to prevent malicious data injection or data number errors. Only after passing the strict control of the data detection unit 113 can the drawing data be stored safely and reliably for use in subsequent design, construction and other links.
[0080] It should be noted that after the data verification is passed, the verified data will be stored in the preset database to ensure subsequent viewing and use. After the data verification is completed, the system will feedback the processing results and display the submission success or failure after receiving the processing results.
[0081] See also Figure 3 , Figure 3 The schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of the drawing review module provided by the present invention. In some embodiments of the present invention, the drawing review module 120 further includes: a task allocation unit 121, a work point creation unit 122 and a problem recording unit 123; the task allocation unit 121, the work point creation unit 122 and the problem recording unit 123 are connected in sequence;
[0082] The task allocation unit 121 is used to send the drawing data in a preset format to the corresponding auditor after the auditor receives the audit task;
[0083] The work point creation unit 122 is used to establish a drawing work point according to drawing data in a preset format, and associate the drawing data corresponding to the drawing work point;
[0084] The problem recording unit 123 is used to record the review issues of the reviewer on the drawing work points into a preset database.
[0085] In the above embodiment, when a new audit task is received, the task assignment unit 121 is responsible for assigning these tasks to the corresponding auditors. The system sends a confirmation task to the auditor, and the auditor receives the confirmation task on the homepage. After the auditor receives the task, the system receives the confirmation message and then sends the audit task to the auditor. In this way, the corresponding auditor can quickly and accurately understand the task requirements and start the audit work.
[0086] Following the task allocation unit 121, the work point creation unit 122 will establish the corresponding drawing work point (that is, the drawing name and drawing number corresponding to the associated drawing) according to the assigned and formatted drawing data. This step is a key link in the audit process because it associates the drawing data with the specific work point, providing a basis for subsequent problem recording and audit tracking. Through the work of the work point creation unit 122, the auditor can understand the structure and content of the drawing more clearly, so as to conduct a more effective audit.
[0087] It should be noted that users can fill in the review opinions in the work point created by the system, or they can divide the drawings into different work points for review by creating work points. When users create work points, they need to manually select the drawings of the created work points to associate the work points with the drawing names.
[0088] Finally, the problem recording unit 123 is responsible for recording the problems found by the auditors during the audit process. When the auditors find that there are questions or errors in the drawing work points, they can use this unit to describe the problems in detail and save them to the preset database. In this way, the problems can be systematically tracked and managed to ensure that each problem can be solved and handled in a timely manner. At the same time, the problem recording unit 123 also provides valuable reference and reference for subsequent audit work, which helps to continuously improve the quality and efficiency of the audit. The preset database is a database that uniformly stores drawing data.
[0089] See also Figure 4 , Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of the data comparison module provided by the present invention. In some embodiments of the present invention, the data comparison module 150 further includes: a document parsing unit 151 and an identification code comparison unit 152; the document parsing unit 151 is connected to the identification code comparison unit 152;
[0090] The document parsing unit 151 is used to parse the reply document and obtain the identification code verified by the construction drawing review system 100;
[0091] The identification code comparison unit 152 is used to compare the parsed reply document with the corresponding drawing data in the preset database to obtain the reply document that meets the system preset identification code.
[0092] In the above embodiment, the main responsibility of the document parsing unit 151 is to conduct in-depth analysis and deconstruction of the reply document. When the reply document enters the system, the document parsing unit 151 will immediately start working to extract key information from the document, especially those identification codes verified by the construction drawing review system 100. These identification codes are the unique identifiers of the document, and they are crucial to ensuring the legality and authenticity of the document.
[0093] Once the document parsing unit 151 has completed its work, the identification code comparison unit 152 will compare the identification code in the parsed reply document with the drawing data in the preset database. The preset database stores a large amount of drawing data and its corresponding identification codes that have been verified by the system. These data are important bases for judging whether the reply document is authentic and valid. Through comparison, the identification code comparison unit 152 can quickly identify which reply documents meet the identification code requirements preset by the system, thereby ensuring that only authentic and accurate reply documents can be accepted and processed by the system.
[0094] In some embodiments of the present invention, it further includes: a display module 170; the display module 170 is connected to the drawing review module 120;
[0095] The display module 170 is used to query target data from a preset database and display the target data.
[0096] In the above embodiment, after the drawing review module 120 completes the review, the display module 170 can query the data to be known in the preset database and call out the query results for display so that the user can view and understand the specific situation of the drawing review.
[0097] See also Figure 5 , Figure 5 The present invention provides a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for reviewing construction drawings provided by the present invention. In a second aspect, the present invention also provides a method for reviewing construction drawings, including:
[0098] S100, converting the uploaded construction drawing into drawing data in a preset format;
[0099] S200, determine the auditor and record the auditor's audit opinion;
[0100] S300, generating a preset template document according to the drawing data in a preset format and the review opinions;
[0101] S400, transmitting the preset template document to the design unit, and transmitting the design unit's reply document to the reviewer;
[0102] S500, comparing the identification code of the reply document with the preset database to obtain the reply document that matches the system preset identification code;
[0103] S600: Associating the reply document with the corresponding drawing data and review opinions in a preset format.
[0104] In the above embodiment, in order to facilitate the review of various forms of construction drawings, the uploaded construction drawings need to be converted into a unified format to ensure that they can be recognized by the system. The converted drawing data should be easy for the system to process and store.
[0105] Determine the appropriate reviewer for the current drawing based on the drawing type, content, project requirements or user designation. The reviewer reviews the drawing and records his / her review opinions. The review opinions should be clear and specific to facilitate subsequent processing and understanding.
[0106] Generate a preset template document based on the drawing data in the preset format and the review opinions given by the reviewer. The preset template document should contain the key information of the drawing, review opinions and possible modification suggestions.
[0107] Transmit the preset template document to the design unit for reference and response. Receive the design unit's response document and transmit it to the auditor. The response document should include the design unit's response to the audit comments and possible modification plans.
[0108] Compare the identification code of the reply document with the identification code in the preset database. Verify the authenticity and validity of the reply document to ensure that it meets the identification code requirements preset by the system. Obtain and retain the reply document that meets the identification code preset by the system.
[0109] Associate the verified response document with the corresponding preset drawing data and review opinions. Ensure that the associated document can clearly reflect the review process, modification suggestions and the design unit's response of the drawing. Store the associated document for subsequent reference and use.
[0110] See also Figure 6 , Figure 6 The present invention provides Figure 5 In some embodiments of the present invention, the uploaded construction drawing is converted into drawing data in a preset format, including:
[0111] S110, perform form verification on the uploaded construction drawing to obtain construction drawing data that meets the requirements of the construction drawing review system;
[0112] S120, parsing the construction drawing data to obtain drawing data in a preset format;
[0113] S130, verifying the drawing data in a preset format, and storing the verified drawing data in the preset format in a preset database.
[0114] In the above embodiment, the uploaded construction drawing is subjected to preliminary form verification to check whether it meets the basic requirements of the construction drawing review system 100, such as file type, size, resolution, etc. If the drawing does not meet the requirements, a corresponding error prompt is given, and the user may be asked to upload it again. If the drawing meets the requirements, it is marked as construction drawing data that meets the requirements of the construction drawing review system 100, and subsequent processing is performed.
[0115] Parse the construction drawing data that has been verified and marked as meeting the requirements, and extract key information, such as layers, lines, annotations, etc. According to the preset format standards, convert these key information into drawing data in a preset format that the system can recognize and process. During the parsing process, capture and process possible errors or exceptions to ensure the accuracy and stability of the parsing.
[0116] Further verify the parsed drawing data in the preset format to check whether it is complete, accurate and correct. If the drawing data passes the verification, it will be stored in the preset database for subsequent review and processing. If the drawing data fails the verification, a corresponding error prompt will be given and an error log will be recorded for subsequent analysis and repair.
[0117] See also Figure 7 , Figure 7 The present invention provides Figure 5 In some embodiments of the present invention, determining the auditor and recording the auditor's audit opinion include:
[0118] S210, after the auditor receives the audit task, the drawing data in a preset format is sent to the corresponding auditor;
[0119] S220, establishing a drawing work point according to the drawing data in a preset format, and associating the drawing data corresponding to the drawing work point;
[0120] S230, recording the review issues of the reviewer on the drawing work points into a preset database.
[0121] In the above embodiment, auditors with corresponding qualifications and experience are selected according to the type and complexity of the drawings. The audit task is formally assigned to the auditor. The specific requirements, time nodes and other relevant information of the audit need to be included when assigning tasks. The drawing data in a preset format is sent to the corresponding auditor. These drawing data must comply with a standardized format to ensure that the auditor can conduct the review smoothly.
[0122] Drawing work points are the identification of key parts or important areas in drawings for further review and recording. Auditors need to parse the received drawing data to identify and understand the content and structure of the drawings. Drawing work points are established according to the specific content of the drawings. These work points should include key locations or important details in the drawings. Associate each drawing work point with its corresponding drawing data to ensure a one-to-one correspondence between the work point and the data. This will facilitate subsequent review and tracking.
[0123] Auditors will raise various questions or suggestions when reviewing drawing work points. These questions and suggestions are recorded in the preset database for subsequent review and processing. Any problems, defects or inconsistencies found by auditors during the review process need to be recorded in detail. These records should include a specific description of the problem, the work points involved, and the possible impact. All problems recorded by the auditors are entered into the preset database. The database should have good query and management functions to support subsequent tracking and processing. In addition to problem records, auditors can also provide suggestions for improvement or other opinions. These opinions should also be organized and recorded in the database.
[0124] In some embodiments of the present invention, comparing the identification code of the reply document with a preset database to obtain a reply document that matches the system preset identification code includes:
[0125] Parse the reply document to obtain an identification code verified by the construction drawing review system 100;
[0126] The parsed reply document is compared with the corresponding drawing data in the preset database to obtain the reply document that meets the system preset identification code.
[0127] In the above embodiment, the reply document needs to contain a unique identification code for identification, and a special parsing tool or program is used to parse the reply document. Confirm whether the format and structure of the identification code meet the preset requirements of the system, such as whether it includes the project number, version number, etc. Verify whether the extracted identification code is valid through the construction drawing review system 100. This may include checking whether the identification code has been registered in the database and whether it meets the specifications and format requirements of the system.
[0128] Retrieve the drawing data corresponding to the parsed identification code from the preset database. The preset database should contain detailed records of the drawing data, including drawing numbers, version information, and related audit records, etc. Compare the parsed response document with the corresponding drawing data in the database. The comparison content includes detailed drawing data, modification records, audit opinions, etc.
[0129] Check whether the information in the reply document is consistent with the information recorded in the database, including the version number of the drawing, modification history and other key data, to ensure that the drawing data in the database is consistent with the identification code in the reply document. If the identification code does not match, it is necessary to further confirm the validity and accuracy of the document, and select the reply documents that meet the system preset identification code from the comparison results. These documents should accurately reflect the data registered in the system and meet the preset standards and requirements. The reply documents that meet the identification code are recorded in the system for subsequent operations, such as processing, review or archiving.
[0130] Filing and organizing response documents that match the preset identification code, including storing the documents in the system and marking them as processed or verified. Notifying relevant personnel (such as auditors, project managers, etc.) about the results of the response document processing. This may include sending a confirmation email, updating the system status, or providing further instructions. Follow up and manage the processed documents to ensure that all issues and suggestions are properly handled, and perform subsequent actions or record updates as required.
[0131] In some embodiments of the present invention, the method further includes: querying target data from a preset database and displaying the target data.
[0132] In the above embodiment, after the drawing review module 120 completes the review, the data to be understood can be queried in the preset database, and the query results can be retrieved for display so that the user can view and understand the specific situation of the drawing review.
[0133] In summary, a construction drawing review system 100 is composed of a drawing acquisition module 110, a drawing review module 120, a document generation module 130, a document transmission module 140, a data comparison module 150 and a data association module 160 connected in sequence, wherein the data association module 160 is also connected to the drawing review module 120. The construction drawing review system 100 composed in this way utilizes the layout form of each module device in the overall system and the mutual connection and interaction relationship of each device to realize the online communication of the personnel of the review unit and the design unit on the construction drawing. After the construction drawing is uploaded to the system through the drawing acquisition module 110, it is assigned to the personnel of the corresponding review unit by the drawing review module 120, and the review personnel are automatically recorded after the review personnel conduct the review. The review opinions are collected to avoid omissions in the manual operation process. Then, a preset template document is generated through the document generation module 130, and the document transmission module 140 is used to send it to the unified receiving end of the designer to facilitate the designer to view it uniformly, thereby improving the efficiency of communication between the two parties. After the designer replies, the reply document is compared with the preset database through the data comparison module 150 to ensure that the content of the reply document is associated with the construction drawings in the preset database. Finally, the reply document that has been successfully compared is associated with the corresponding drawing data and review opinions in the preset format through the data association module 160, and the related materials of the same construction drawing are uniformly managed to avoid the possibility of manual communication and omissions, avoid delays in project progress, and improve overall efficiency.
[0134] The above is only an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, and the scope of the present disclosure cannot be limited thereto. That is, any equivalent changes and modifications made according to the teachings of the present disclosure are still within the scope of the present disclosure. After considering the specification and practicing the disclosure here, those skilled in the art will easily think of the implementation scheme of the present disclosure. This application is intended to cover any modification, use or adaptation of the present disclosure, which follows the general principles of the present disclosure and includes common knowledge or customary technical means in the technical field not recorded in the present disclosure. The description and examples are regarded as exemplary only, and the scope and spirit of the present disclosure are defined by the claims.
[0135] The technical features of the above embodiments may be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification.
[0136] It will be easily understood by those skilled in the art that the above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions and improvements made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims
1. A construction drawing review system, characterized in that: include: A drawing acquisition module, a drawing review module, a document generation module, a document transmission module, a data comparison module and a data association module; the drawing acquisition module, the drawing review module, the document generation module, the document transmission module, the data comparison module and the data association module are connected in sequence; the data association module is also connected to the drawing review module; Wherein, the drawing acquisition module is used to convert the uploaded construction drawing into drawing data in a preset format; The drawing review module is used to determine the reviewer and record the reviewer's review opinions; The document generation module is used to generate a preset template document according to the drawing data in the preset format and the review opinion; The document transmission module is used to transmit the preset template document to the design unit, and transmit the design unit's reply document to the reviewer; The data comparison module is used to compare the identification code of the reply document with the preset database, obtain the reply document that matches the system preset identification code and send it to the data association module; The data association module is used to associate the reply document with corresponding drawing data and review opinions in a preset format.
2. The construction drawing review system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The drawing acquisition module further includes: a drawing verification unit, a data parsing unit and a data detection unit; the drawing verification unit, the data parsing unit and the data detection unit are connected in sequence; The drawing verification unit is used to perform form verification on the uploaded construction drawing to obtain construction drawing data that meets the requirements of the construction drawing review system; The data parsing unit is used to parse the construction drawing data to obtain drawing data in a preset format; The data detection unit is used to verify the drawing data in the preset format, and store the verified drawing data in the preset format into the preset database.
3. The construction drawing review system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The drawing review module further includes: a task allocation unit, a work point creation unit and a problem recording unit; the task allocation unit, the work point creation unit and the problem recording unit are connected in sequence; Wherein, the task allocation unit is used to send the drawing data in the preset format to the corresponding auditor after the auditor receives the audit task; The work point creation unit is used to establish a drawing work point according to the drawing data in the preset format, and associate the drawing data corresponding to the drawing work point; The problem recording unit is used to record the review personnel's review issues on the drawing work points into the preset database.
4. The construction drawing review system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The data comparison module further includes: a document parsing unit and an identification code comparison unit; the document parsing unit is connected to the identification code comparison unit; The document parsing unit is used to parse the reply document and obtain an identification code verified by the construction drawing review system; The identification code comparison unit is used to compare the parsed reply document with the corresponding drawing data in the preset database to obtain a reply document that meets the system preset identification code.
5. The construction drawing review system according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: Display module; The display module is connected to the drawing review module; The display module is used to query target data from the preset database and display the target data.
6. A method for reviewing construction drawings, characterized in that: include: Convert the uploaded construction drawings into drawing data in a preset format; Determine the auditors and record their audit opinions; Generate a preset template document according to the drawing data in the preset format and the review opinion; Transmitting the preset template document to the design unit, and transmitting the design unit's reply document to the reviewer; Compare the identification code of the reply document with the preset database to obtain the reply document that matches the system preset identification code; The reply document is associated with the corresponding drawing data and review opinions in a preset format.
7. The method for reviewing construction drawings as claimed in claim 6, characterized in that: The step of converting the uploaded construction drawing into drawing data in a preset format includes: Perform form verification on the uploaded construction drawing to obtain construction drawing data that meets the requirements of the construction drawing review system; Parsing the construction drawing data to obtain drawing data in a preset format; The drawing data in the preset format is verified, and the drawing data in the preset format that passes the verification is stored in the preset database.
8. The method for reviewing construction drawings as claimed in claim 6, characterized in that: Determine the auditor and record the auditor's audit opinions, including: After the auditor receives the audit task, the drawing data in the preset format is sent to the corresponding auditor; Establishing a drawing work point according to the drawing data in the preset format, and associating the drawing data corresponding to the drawing work point; The review issues of the reviewer on the drawing work points are recorded in the preset database.
9. The method for reviewing construction drawings as claimed in claim 6, characterized in that: The step of comparing the identification code of the reply document with a preset database to obtain a reply document that matches the system preset identification code includes: Parsing the reply document to obtain an identification code verified by the construction drawing review system; The parsed reply document is compared with the corresponding drawing data in the preset database to obtain a reply document that meets the system preset identification code.
10. The method for reviewing construction drawings according to claim 6, characterized in that: Also includes: Query target data from the preset database and display the target data.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Design drawing reviewing method and system and server
CN109670259A
Feedback method and device based on online document comments, equipment and storage medium
CN110866193A
Paperless auditing method, PLM system, tablet computer equipment and storage medium
CN114119795A
Construction drawing review method and system based on multi-drawing joint review
CN114282883A
Electronic system for assembly type building completion acceptance report
CN115186648A
Cited By
Engineering project review method and system based on artificial intelligence
CN120013282A
