Hierarchical safety performance automatic examination system

Abstract

The invention provides a hierarchical safety performance automatic assessment system, and relates to the technical field of performance assessment, and the system comprises a daily inspection performance assessment module which is used for recording and processing daily safety inspection data to generate a daily assessment score; the project-level safety performance assessment module is used for sending configuration information to the assessment item user-defined maintenance module according to the characteristics and safety requirements of the project so as to determine a user-defined assessment item and obtain a project-level assessment score; the company-level safety performance assessment module is used for summarizing project-level assessment scores of all projects in a company and performing high-level assessment and evaluation to obtain company-level assessment scores; and the assessment item user-defined maintenance module is used for flexibly adding, modifying or deleting assessment items according to actual requirements. Through multi-level performance assessment, comprehensive, objective and timely monitoring and assessment of safety performance conditions are realized.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of job performance assessment, and in particular to a hierarchical automatic security job performance assessment system. Background Art

[0002] Safety performance assessment refers to the evaluation and inspection of the performance of safety production duties by managers and employees at all levels in an enterprise or organization over a certain period of time. It is an important part of safety production management, which aims to ensure that personnel at all levels clearly understand and fulfill their responsibilities in safety production, improve safety management level, and prevent and reduce accidents.

[0003] Traditional safety performance assessments rely on manual recording and evaluation, which is inefficient, subjective, and inaccurate. Currently, enterprises face problems such as inefficiency, subjectivity, and opaque data when conducting safety performance assessments at the branch, subsidiary, and project levels. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present application aims to solve one of the technical problems in the related art at least to some extent.

[0005] To this end, the first purpose of this application is to propose a hierarchical security performance automatic assessment system.

[0006] The second objective of the present application is to provide an electronic device.

[0007] The third object of the present application is to provide a computer-readable storage medium.

[0008] A fourth object of the present application is to provide a computer program product.

[0009] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the first embodiment of the present application proposes a hierarchical security performance automatic assessment system, including:

[0010] Daily inspection and performance assessment module, project-level safety performance assessment module, company-level safety performance assessment module, assessment item custom maintenance module, and safety cockpit display module;

[0011] The daily inspection and performance assessment module is used to record and process daily safety inspection data, and identify violations based on the daily safety inspection data to generate daily assessment scores;

[0012] The project-level safety performance assessment module is used to send configuration information to the assessment item custom maintenance module to determine custom assessment items according to the characteristics and safety requirements of the project, and to assess the project safety inspection data within the project cycle according to the custom assessment items to obtain a project-level assessment score;

[0013] The company-level safety performance assessment module is used to summarize the project-level assessment scores of various projects in the company, and conduct high-level assessments and evaluations to obtain company-level assessment scores;

[0014] The assessment item custom maintenance module is used to flexibly add, modify or delete assessment items according to actual needs;

[0015] The safety cockpit display module is respectively connected to the daily inspection performance assessment module, the project-level safety performance assessment module, and the company-level safety performance assessment module, and is used to obtain daily assessment scores, assessment item custom maintenance modules or safety cockpit display modules, and display them through a visual interface.

[0016] Optionally, the daily inspection and performance assessment module includes: a daily inspection module, a weekly inspection module and a monthly inspection module;

[0017] The daily inspection module is used to capture the number of daily inspections that should be inspected and the number of daily inspections actually inspected, determine the number of daily inspections that should be inspected in the month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the first deduction item according to the number of daily inspections that should be inspected and the number of daily inspections actually inspected;

[0018] The weekly inspection module is used to capture the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected and the number of weekly inspections actually inspected, determine the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected in that month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the second deduction item according to the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected and the number of weekly inspections actually inspected;

[0019] The monthly inspection module is used to capture the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected and the number of monthly inspections actually inspected, determine the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected for that month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the third deduction item according to the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected and the number of monthly inspections actually inspected;

[0020] The daily assessment scoring module is used to determine the daily assessment score based on the total score and the first deduction item, the second deduction item, and the third deduction item.

[0021] Optionally, the project-level safety performance assessment module includes:

[0022] The project fetching module is used to obtain the name and type of each project from the project list;

[0023] A project assessment item acquisition module is used to obtain the assessment items corresponding to the current project type from the assessment item custom maintenance module;

[0024] The project evaluation module is used to determine the project-level evaluation score based on the evaluation items and project information corresponding to the current project.

[0025] Optionally, the project evaluation module includes:

[0026] A security access assessment module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the security access completion status;

[0027] a project summary evaluation module, for determining a project sub-score according to the number of columns of the project summary;

[0028] The project unit personnel information evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the number of project unit personnel information columns;

[0029] The construction organization design and construction plan evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score according to the number of columns of the construction organization design and construction plan;

[0030] A project-related unit assessment module is used to determine the project sub-score based on whether a project-related unit exists;

[0031] The dangerous and major project management assessment module is used to determine the project sub-scores based on the dangerous and major project management situation;

[0032] Civilized construction evaluation module, used to determine project sub-scores based on civilized construction conditions;

[0033] The personnel list evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the personnel entry of the general contractor and subcontractor;

[0034] Personnel presence evaluation module, used to determine the project sub-score based on the number of personnel presence data input;

[0035] The project-level assessment score calculation module is used to add up the sub-scores of each project to determine the project-level assessment score.

[0036] Optionally, the company-level safety performance assessment module includes:

[0037] A company type acquisition module is used to acquire the company type, wherein the subordinate unit types include B1 type, B2 type and C type;

[0038] A company-level assessment item acquisition module is used to obtain the assessment items corresponding to the current company type from the assessment item custom maintenance module;

[0039] The company-level evaluation module is used to obtain company information and to evaluate the company information and the evaluation items corresponding to the current company type to obtain the company-level evaluation score.

[0040] Optionally, the company-level assessment module includes:

[0041] The legal and regulatory assessment module is used to capture the legal and regulatory document data of B1 and B2 type companies every quarter, and determine the company's sub-score based on the newly added legal and regulatory documents;

[0042] The rules and regulations assessment module is used to obtain the rules and regulations document data every quarter and determine the company's sub-score based on the addition of rules and regulations documents;

[0043] The project quantity assessment module is used to compare the number of project departments in the monthly safety organization with the number of projects in the project record, and determine the company's sub-score based on the difference between the number of project departments and the number of projects;

[0044] The personnel information completeness assessment module is used to obtain the organizational structure and personnel information of each company and determine the company sub-score based on the number of information items;

[0045] Safety training assessment module, used to obtain the number of safety training plan reports and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of reports;

[0046] A safety culture publicity assessment module is used to obtain the number of safety culture publicity articles and determine the company sub-score according to the number of safety culture publicity articles;

[0047] The safety target assessment module is used to obtain the safety production responsibility statement data at the branch, subsidiary or employee level, and determine the company's sub-score based on the update of the safety production responsibility statement.

[0048] Optionally, the company-level assessment module further includes:

[0049] The safety meeting assessment module is used to obtain data on department-level and unit-level safety meetings and determine company sub-scores based on monthly safety meetings;

[0050] The occupational health management assessment module is used to obtain the data in the occupational health management menu and determine the company sub-score according to the number of items in the occupational health management menu;

[0051] The third-level safety training assessment module is used to obtain the employee's training participation status when there is a job or department transfer or a new employee is added, and determine the company's sub-score based on whether all training has been completed;

[0052] The hidden danger investigation and treatment assessment module is used to obtain data on hidden dangers that have not been rectified within the time limit during general inspections and inspections by leading cadres, and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of hidden dangers that have not been rectified within the time limit;

[0053] The leadership inspection and assessment module is used to obtain the monthly and quarterly inspection data of leadership cadres and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of inspections each leader has conducted that month;

[0054] The safety work task assessment module is used to obtain the monthly safety work task overdue and unfinished situation, and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of safety work tasks overdue and unfinished;

[0055] The emergency management assessment module is used to obtain emergency plan data and determine the company's sub-score based on whether emergency plan data exists;

[0056] The company-level assessment score calculation module is used to add up the sub-scores of each company to determine the company-level assessment score.

[0057] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, a second aspect of the present application provides an electronic device, including: a processor, and a memory communicatively connected to the processor;

[0058] The memory stores computer-executable instructions;

[0059] The processor executes the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory to implement the system as described in any one of the first aspects.

[0060] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the third aspect of the present application proposes a computer-readable storage medium, in which computer-readable storage medium is stored computer-executable instructions, and when the computer-executable instructions are executed by a processor, they are used to implement a system as described in any one of the first aspects.

[0061] To achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the fourth aspect of the present application provides a computer program product, which, when executed by a processor, implements the system described in any one of the first aspects.

[0062] The hierarchical security performance automatic assessment system, device, electronic equipment and storage medium provided in this application realizes comprehensive, objective and timely monitoring and evaluation of security performance through multi-level performance assessment. Automated assessment process reduces manual intervention and significantly improves assessment efficiency. Automatically calculate assessment results based on actual data to reduce the influence of subjective factors and ensure the fairness and accuracy of assessment results. Through visual display, the performance of security duties is clear at a glance, which facilitates management to quickly grasp the security situation and formulate targeted improvement measures. Supports customized assessment items to meet the personalized assessment needs of different enterprises and projects.

[0063] Additional aspects and advantages of the present application will be given in part in the description below, and in part will become apparent from the description below, or will be learned through the practice of the present application. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0064] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of the present application will become apparent and easily understood from the following description of the embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0065] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the structure of a hierarchical security performance automatic assessment system provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0066] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a security performance hierarchy structure provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0067] Embodiments of the present application are described in detail below, and examples of the embodiments are shown in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals throughout represent the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and are intended to be used to explain the present application, and should not be construed as limiting the present application.

[0068] Safety performance assessment refers to the evaluation and inspection of the performance of safety production duties by managers and employees at all levels in an enterprise or organization over a certain period of time. It is an important part of safety production management, which aims to ensure that personnel at all levels clearly understand and fulfill their responsibilities in safety production, improve safety management level, and prevent and reduce accidents.

[0069] Safety performance assessment usually includes the following contents:

[0070] Performance of job responsibilities: Assess whether individuals perform safety management duties in accordance with job responsibilities, such as formulating safety plans, organizing safety training, conducting safety inspections, handling accidents and risks, etc.

[0071] Implementation of safety system: Assess whether individuals strictly abide by relevant laws, regulations, standards, rules and operating procedures, and whether a sound safety production management system has been established.

[0072] Safety training and awareness raising: Evaluate individual performance in safety training and awareness raising, whether safety training is organized regularly and whether employees’ safety awareness is improved.

[0073] Safety inspection and hidden danger investigation and management: Evaluate individual performance in safety inspection and hidden danger investigation and management, whether safety inspections are conducted regularly and whether safety hazards are discovered and handled in a timely manner.

[0074] Accident Response and Handling: Assess the individual’s performance in accident response and handling, whether the accident was reported and handled in a timely manner, and whether effective measures were taken to prevent similar accidents from happening again.

[0075] Safety production investment: review and approve the annual budget for safety production investment, ensure that safety investment complies with relevant regulatory investment standards, and ensure the effective implementation of the annual plan.

[0076] Safety production responsibility system: Promote the safety responsibility of "Party and government share the same responsibility, one post with two responsibilities, and joint efforts to manage", and managers at all levels shall fulfill their responsibilities according to their job requirements.

[0077] Standardization construction of safe production: carry out standardization construction of safe production with the contents of meeting job standards, professional standards and standardization creation.

[0078] All-staff safety production responsibility system: Establish and improve the all-staff safety production responsibility system, and clarify the responsible persons, responsibility scope, and responsibility list of each position.

[0079] Safety production education and training: Strengthen the safety production theory teaching and practical skills training of employees, and record it in the education and training assessment files.

[0080] To address this problem, the present application embodiment provides a hierarchical security performance automatic assessment system. Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a hierarchical security performance automatic assessment system provided by an embodiment of the present application. Figure 1 As shown, the system includes: a daily inspection performance assessment module 10, a project-level safety performance assessment module 20, a company-level safety performance assessment module 30, an assessment item custom maintenance module 40, and a safety cockpit display module 50;

[0081] The daily inspection and performance assessment module is used to record and process daily safety inspection data, and identify violations based on the daily safety inspection data to generate daily assessment scores;

[0082] The project-level safety performance assessment module is used to send configuration information to the assessment item custom maintenance module to determine custom assessment items according to the characteristics and safety requirements of the project, and to assess the project safety inspection data within the project cycle according to the custom assessment items to obtain a project-level assessment score;

[0083] The company-level safety performance assessment module is used to summarize the project-level assessment scores of various projects in the company, and conduct high-level assessments and evaluations to obtain company-level assessment scores;

[0084] The assessment item custom maintenance module is used to flexibly add, modify or delete assessment items according to actual needs;

[0085] The safety cockpit display module is respectively connected to the daily inspection performance assessment module, the project-level safety performance assessment module, and the company-level safety performance assessment module, and is used to obtain daily assessment scores, assessment item custom maintenance modules or safety cockpit display modules, and display them through a visual interface.

[0086] In this embodiment, the daily inspection and performance assessment module is responsible for recording and processing the data of daily safety inspections, and automatically identifying and capturing violations or behaviors that do not meet safety standards as deduction items.

[0087] The project-level safety performance assessment module customizes assessment items for specific projects based on project characteristics and safety requirements, automatically summarizes daily inspection data and other relevant safety data within the project cycle, and conducts comprehensive assessment and scoring.

[0088] Based on the project-level assessment, the company-level safety performance assessment module further summarizes the safety performance of branches, subsidiaries or the entire company, and conducts higher-level assessment and evaluation.

[0089] The assessment item custom maintenance module allows administrators to flexibly add, modify or delete assessment items according to actual needs to adapt to the security performance assessment needs in different scenarios.

[0090] The safety cockpit display module uses a visual interface (such as pie charts, bar charts, etc.) to intuitively display the completion status of daily inspections, project-level and company-level safety performance assessments. It supports data penetration and detailed assessment records can be viewed by clicking on the chart.

[0091] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a security performance hierarchy structure provided in an embodiment of the present application is shown in FIG. Figure 2 As shown, this embodiment conducts safety performance assessment at three levels: daily, project level, and company level. The assessments at the three levels are independent of each other, and the assessment levels are relatively rich, which can comprehensively reflect the safety performance situation.

[0092] Through this embodiment, the following improvements can be achieved:

[0093] Improve efficiency: Automate the assessment process, reduce manual intervention, and significantly improve assessment efficiency.

[0094] Enhance objectivity: Automatically calculate assessment results based on actual data, reduce the influence of subjective factors, and ensure the fairness and accuracy of assessment results.

[0095] Improve management level: Through visual display, the performance of security duties can be clearly seen, which makes it easier for management to quickly grasp the security situation and formulate targeted improvement measures.

[0096] Strong flexibility: supports customized assessment items to meet the personalized assessment needs of different companies and projects.

[0097] Optionally, the daily inspection and performance assessment module includes: a daily inspection module, a weekly inspection module and a monthly inspection module;

[0098] The daily inspection module is used to capture the number of daily inspections that should be inspected and the number of daily inspections actually inspected, determine the number of daily inspections that should be inspected in the month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the first deduction item according to the number of daily inspections that should be inspected and the number of daily inspections actually inspected;

[0099] The weekly inspection module is used to capture the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected and the number of weekly inspections actually inspected, determine the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected in that month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the second deduction item according to the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected and the number of weekly inspections actually inspected;

[0100] In this embodiment, the number of inspections required is obtained by the system capturing the number of inspections. If the work is stopped on that day, the system determines that the number of daily inspections required for that month is reduced by 1 according to the shutdown cycle. That is, the number of inspections required is reduced by the number of days of shutdown.

[0101] If the actual inspection times are less than the required inspection times (except for inspection task adjustment), 1 point will be deducted per time.

[0102] Number of hidden dangers rectified: 0.5 points will be deducted for each overdue hidden danger

[0103] The monthly inspection module is used to capture the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected and the number of monthly inspections actually inspected, determine the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected for that month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the third deduction item according to the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected and the number of monthly inspections actually inspected;

[0104] In this embodiment, the number of inspections required is obtained by: the system captures the number of times. If the work is stopped for a whole week, the system determines that the number of inspections required for that month is reduced by 1 according to the shutdown cycle. If it is less than a week, the number of inspections required remains unchanged.

[0105] If the actual inspection times are less than the required inspection times (except for inspection task adjustment), 4 points will be deducted per time.

[0106] Number of hidden dangers rectified: 1 point will be deducted for each time when hidden dangers are rectified overdue

[0107] The daily assessment scoring module is used to determine the daily assessment score based on the total score and the first deduction item, the second deduction item, and the third deduction item.

[0108] In this embodiment, the number of inspections required is obtained by: the system captures the number of times. If the entire month is a shutdown, then the system determines that the number of inspections required for that month is 0 based on the shutdown period.

[0109] If the actual inspection times are less than the required inspection times (except for inspection task adjustment), 10 points will be deducted per time.

[0110] Update volume: Click "Not compliant / Update" to fetch data

[0111] In this embodiment, the daily inspection performance assessment module is used to inspect the three-level inspection safety performance of the project. The system automatically captures the number of daily / weekly / monthly inspections and actual inspections, as well as the number of hidden dangers discovered and the number of hidden dangers rectified. The scoring principle is: a percentage system, using a deduction method.

[0112] Optionally, the project-level safety performance assessment module includes:

[0113] The project fetching module is used to obtain the name and type of each project from the project list;

[0114] A project assessment item acquisition module is used to obtain the assessment items corresponding to the current project type from the assessment item custom maintenance module;

[0115] The project evaluation module is used to determine the project-level evaluation score based on the evaluation items and project information corresponding to the current project.

[0116] In this embodiment, the project types include engineering general contracting projects, supervision projects, operation projects, machinery manufacturing projects, etc. Each project type will be configured with corresponding assessment items according to the specific situation and characteristics of the project.

[0117] Optionally, the project evaluation module includes:

[0118] A security access assessment module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the security access completion status;

[0119] a project summary evaluation module, for determining a project sub-score according to the number of columns of the project summary;

[0120] The project unit personnel information evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the number of project unit personnel information columns;

[0121] The construction organization design and construction plan evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score according to the number of columns of the construction organization design and construction plan;

[0122] A project-related unit assessment module is used to determine the project sub-score based on whether a project-related unit exists;

[0123] The dangerous and major project management assessment module is used to determine the project sub-scores based on the dangerous and major project management situation;

[0124] Civilized construction evaluation module, used to determine project sub-scores based on civilized construction conditions;

[0125] The personnel list evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the personnel entry of the general contractor and subcontractor;

[0126] Personnel presence evaluation module, used to determine the project sub-score based on the number of personnel presence data input;

[0127] The project-level assessment score calculation module is used to add up the sub-scores of each project to determine the project-level assessment score.

[0128] In this embodiment, the deduction items include the following items:

[0129] Whether the security access assessment is completed: No, deduct 5 points

[0130] Project summary: 0.5 points will be deducted for each missing column

[0131] Project unit / personnel information: 0.5 points will be deducted for each missing column

[0132] Safety production management system information: 1 point will be deducted for each missing attachment

[0133] Construction organization design / (special) construction plan: None, deduct 1.5 points

[0134] Project related units: None, deduct 1.5 points

[0135] Dangerous and major project management: None, deduct 1.5 points

[0136] Civilized construction: at least 6 pictures should be judged, and 0.5 points will be deducted for each missing picture.

[0137] Personnel list: Both the general contractor and the subcontractor must have personnel entry. If not, 1.5 points will be deducted.

[0138] Personnel presence statistics: data must be entered every week, at least 4 times a month, and 1.5 points will be deducted for each missed time

[0139] Special operations personnel: Just input the personnel information to determine whether there are attachments. If there are no attachments, 1.5 points will be deducted; for each missing attachment, 0.5 points will be deducted.

[0140] Special equipment: Just judge whether it exists or not. If not, deduct 1.5 points

[0141] Training and briefing records: For the general contractor: (30-number of days of suspension) / 7, rounded up = number of trainings; For the subcontractor: judge whether there are training or briefing records. For each missing one, 1.5 points will be deducted; for each subcontractor, if there is no record, 3 points will be deducted

[0142] Level 3 safety training: The total number of people recorded at level 3 must be greater than or equal to the number of people present this week. If the number is lower than the number of people present this week, 1.5 points will be deducted.

[0143] Risk control: Just check whether there is risk control checklist. If not, deduct 2.5 points

[0144] Safety meeting: at least once a month, if there is no meeting, 2.5 points will be deducted

[0145] Hazard investigation and control: Use project-level safety performance data, score calculation: (100-actual score of level 3 performance)*0.3=actual deduction

[0146] Emergency and accident management: Emergency plans only need to determine whether they exist or not

[0147] Emergency response team: Just determine whether there is

[0148] Emergency drill plan: Just judge whether there is

[0149] Drill preparation and implementation: Determine whether there is any delay. If there is any delay, points will be deducted. If there are incomplete attachments, points will also be deducted. 1. No plan, deduct 1.5 points; 2. No emergency response team, deduct 1 point; 3. No drill plan, deduct 1.5 points; 4. Deduct 1 point if the deadline is exceeded. If there is any incomplete attachment, deduct 1 point for each missing attachment.

[0150] Suspension and resumption of work management: Determine whether there is any suspension and resumption of work file uploaded. If no attachment is uploaded, 1 point will be deducted (suspension / resumption of work).

[0151] Optionally, the company-level safety performance assessment module includes:

[0152] A company type acquisition module is used to acquire the company type, wherein the subordinate unit types include B1 type, B2 type and C type;

[0153] A company-level assessment item acquisition module is used to obtain the assessment items corresponding to the current company type from the assessment item custom maintenance module;

[0154] The company-level evaluation module is used to obtain company information and to evaluate the company information and the evaluation items corresponding to the current company type to obtain the company-level evaluation score.

[0155] In this embodiment, the unit type definition: the subordinate unit types are divided into B1, B2, and C categories, and the unit type is uniformly set in the basic information of the platform. The corresponding assessment items are assessed according to the unit type.

[0156] Explanation of assessment terms: Variable deduction: If a certain assessment item fails to meet the requirements of the assessment rules in the assessment of the current month, points will be deducted according to the scoring rules; if the assessment item meets the assessment rules in the next assessment, no points will be deducted. For example: B1-type unit Company A did not add any new rules and regulations in January, so 1 point will be deducted from this assessment item in January. If no points are deducted from other assessment items, the company's final score for January is 99 points; 5 new rules and regulations were added in February, so no points will be deducted from this assessment item. If no points are deducted from other assessment items, the company's final score for January is 100 points.

[0157] Optionally, the company-level assessment module includes:

[0158] The legal and regulatory assessment module is used to capture the legal and regulatory document data of B1 and B2 type companies every quarter, and determine the company's sub-score based on the newly added legal and regulatory documents;

[0159] In this embodiment, new legal and regulatory documents need to be uploaded every quarter, which is judged based on the last modified date. Assessments are conducted in March, June, September, and December each year, and not in other months. The platform application scoring rule is to capture the legal and regulatory document data for each quarter. If there is no new legal and regulatory document, 1 point will be deducted. This item is not assessed in the daily management comprehensive scoring rule.

[0160] The rules and regulations assessment module is used to obtain the rules and regulations document data every quarter and determine the company's sub-score based on the addition of rules and regulations documents;

[0161] In this embodiment, new rules and regulations files need to be uploaded every quarter, which is judged based on the upload date. Assessments are conducted in March, June, September, and December each year, and no assessments are conducted in other months. The platform application scoring rule is to take the rules and regulations file data for each quarter. If there is no new rules and regulations file, 1 point will be deducted. The comprehensive scoring rules for daily management are:

[0162] Category B1 units: Based on the upload date, assessment is conducted once a month with at least 5 systems. 0.2 points will be deducted for each missing system. The maximum deduction is 1 point. The system must be a company-level or unit-level system.

[0163] Category B2 units: Based on the upload date, assessment will be conducted once a month with at least 3 systems. 0.2 points will be deducted for each missing system. The maximum deduction is 0.6 points. The system must be a company-level or unit-level system.

[0164] Category C units: Judging by the upload date, assessment is conducted once a month, with at least one system; 0.5 points will be deducted for each missing system; a maximum of 0.5 points will be deducted; the system must be a unit-level system.

[0165] The project quantity assessment module is used to compare the number of project departments in the monthly safety organization with the number of projects in the project record, and determine the company's sub-score based on the difference between the number of project departments and the number of projects;

[0166] In this embodiment, the platform application scoring rule is to judge based on the number of projects in the project record every month. If the number of project departments in the safety organization is reduced by one, 3 points will be deducted, with a maximum deduction of 6 points. The daily management comprehensive scoring rule is to judge based on the number of projects in the project record every month. If the number of project departments in the safety organization is reduced by one, 0.5 points will be deducted, with a maximum deduction of 1 point.

[0167] The personnel information completeness assessment module is used to obtain the organizational structure and personnel information of each company and determine the company sub-score based on the number of information items;

[0168] In this embodiment, the completeness of the information of the organizational structure personnel of each unit is assessed monthly. The required information includes: personnel, position, telephone number, and security responsibility. The platform application scoring rules are personnel, position, telephone number, and security responsibility. For each missing piece of information, 1 point is deducted, and the maximum is 3 points. If personnel, position, telephone number, and security responsibility are all missing, 3 points are directly deducted. The comprehensive scoring rules for daily management are personnel, position, telephone number, and security responsibility. For each missing piece of information, 0.5 points are deducted, and the maximum is 1 point.

[0169] Safety training assessment module, used to obtain the number of safety training plan reports and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of reports;

[0170] In this embodiment, the number of safety training plans (reports) per year. Class B1 units are assessed every 3 months, Class B2 units are assessed every 4 months, and Class C units are assessed every 6 months, and the assessment results are recorded in the last month of each period. The platform application scoring rules are as follows: Class B1 units: at least 4 training plans a year. For each missing time, deduct 0.5 points; Class B2 units: at least 3 plans a year. For each missing time, deduct 0.5 points; Class C units: at least 2 plans a year. For each missing time, deduct 0.5 points. The comprehensive scoring rule for daily management is to directly capture the deduction points for this informationization.

[0171] The data in the training plan list of the planned task management is captured every month. A training plan must be generated and implemented every month. The platform application scoring rule is that if the training task is not completed as planned, that is, the training record is closed and overdue, 1 point will be deducted each time; the daily management comprehensive scoring rule is to directly capture this informationization and deduct points.

[0172] A safety culture publicity assessment module is used to obtain the number of safety culture publicity articles and determine the company sub-score according to the number of safety culture publicity articles;

[0173] In this embodiment, the number of articles of safety culture publicity (number of articles of three types of publicity categories) is captured each month: 3 articles per month for B1 units, 2 articles per month for B2 units, and 1 article per month for C units. The platform application scoring rule is that for each missing article per month for each type of unit, 0.5 points will be deducted; B1 units will be deducted a maximum of 1.5 points; B2 units will be deducted a maximum of 1 point; and C units will be deducted a maximum of 0.5 points. No points will be deducted for the daily management comprehensive scoring rule.

[0174] The safety target assessment module is used to obtain the safety production responsibility statement data at the branch, subsidiary or employee level, and determine the company's sub-score based on the update of the safety production responsibility statement.

[0175] In this embodiment, the safety production responsibility statement data at the branch, subsidiary or employee level is captured. The assessment is only based on the year, and the assessment effective month is selected by the user manager. Assessment objects: B1 and B2 units. The platform application scoring rules are: if the safety production responsibility statement at the branch, subsidiary level is not updated in the current year, 3 points will be deducted; if the safety production responsibility statement at the employee level is not updated in the current year, 2 points will be deducted; if the safety production responsibility statement at both the branch, subsidiary and employee levels is not updated in the current year, 5 points will be deducted. The comprehensive scoring rule for daily management is that if the safety production responsibility statement at the branch, subsidiary level, employee level or unit level is not updated in the current year, 1 point will be deducted.

[0176] Capture the unit-level safety production responsibility statement data. The assessment is based only on the year, and the assessment effective month is selected by the user manager. Assessment object: Class C units. The platform application scoring rules are: no update at the unit level, deduct 3 points; no update at the employee level, deduct 2 points; no update at both the unit level and the employee level, deduct 5 points. The daily management comprehensive scoring rule is that if there is no update to the safety production responsibility statement at the branch, subsidiary, employee, or unit level in the current year, deduct 1 point.

[0177] Optionally, the company-level assessment module further includes:

[0178] The safety meeting assessment module is used to obtain data on department-level and unit-level safety meetings and determine company sub-scores based on monthly safety meetings;

[0179] In this embodiment, the platform application scoring rules are as follows: B1-type units: at least once a month. None, deduct 1 point; B2-type units: at least once a month. None, deduct 1 point; C-type units: at least once every six months (once in the first and second half of the year). None, deduct 1 point. The daily management comprehensive scoring rules directly capture this information deduction.

[0180] The occupational health management assessment module is used to obtain the data in the occupational health management menu and determine the company sub-score according to the number of items in the occupational health management menu;

[0181] In this embodiment, except for the occupational disease hazard factor detection report, other management menus must have data, and assessment is conducted once a year, in December, and not in other months. The platform application scoring rule is that if there is no data in the menu, 0.5 points will be deducted. The daily management comprehensive scoring rule is to directly capture this informationization deduction.

[0182] The third-level safety training assessment module is used to obtain the employee's training participation status when there is a job or department transfer or a new employee is added, and determine the company's sub-score based on whether all training has been completed;

[0183] In this embodiment, the department-level and job-level course settings are assessed. The platform application scoring rules are: if the department-level and job-level courses are not fully set up, 1 point will be deducted; monthly assessments will be conducted until all settings are completed, and no points will be deducted. Otherwise, points will be deducted every month. The daily management comprehensive scoring rules are: if there is a job or department transfer or a new employee is added, the system will capture whether the employee has participated in all the training that should be conducted. If not all training is completed, 0.5 points will be deducted.

[0184] If there is a job or department transfer or a new employee is added, the system will check whether the employee has participated in all the training that should be conducted. The platform application scoring rule is: if all trainings are not completed, 1 point will be deducted. Scoring premise: from the generation of the training task, the assessment will be automatically conducted 15 days later. The daily management comprehensive scoring rule is: if there is a job or department transfer or a new employee is added, the system will check whether the employee has participated in all the training that should be conducted. If all trainings are not completed, 0.5 points will be deducted.

[0185] The hidden danger investigation and treatment assessment module is used to obtain data on hidden dangers that have not been rectified within the time limit during general inspections and inspections by leading cadres, and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of hidden dangers that have not been rectified within the time limit;

[0186] In this embodiment, data on hidden dangers that have not been rectified overdue during general inspections and inspections by leading cadres are captured every month. The scoring rule for platform application is: 3 points will be deducted for each hidden danger that has not been rectified overdue. Note: For hidden dangers that have not been rectified overdue in January, points will continue to be deducted if they are still not rectified in February. The comprehensive scoring rule for daily management is: For hidden dangers found during inspections by company leading cadres, if they have not been accepted, 0.5 points will be deducted for each one; a maximum of 2 points. For hidden dangers found during inspections by production department leaders and branch and subsidiary leaders, if they have not been accepted, 0.5 points will be deducted for each one; a maximum of 1 point.

[0187] The leadership inspection and assessment module is used to obtain the monthly and quarterly inspection data of leadership cadres and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of inspections each leader has conducted that month;

[0188] In this embodiment, data on whether leaders have performed inspections every month and every quarter is captured. The platform application scoring rule is that if the number of inspections actually performed by each leader in the month is less than the number of inspections that should be performed, 2 points will be deducted. The daily management comprehensive scoring rule is: if the number of inspections actually performed by each leader in the month is less than the number of inspections that should be performed, 1 point will be deducted.

[0189] The safety work task assessment module is used to obtain the monthly safety work task overdue and unfinished situation, and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of safety work tasks overdue and unfinished;

[0190] In this embodiment, it is captured whether there are any overdue and unfinished monthly safety work tasks. The platform application scoring rules are: judged according to the deadline of the task deadline every month, if there are overdue and unfinished tasks, 3 points will be deducted for each task, and a maximum of 6 points will be deducted. The comprehensive scoring rules for daily management are: B1 type units: as long as there is 1 unfinished task in the month, 0.5 points will be deducted, and a maximum of 6 points will be deducted. B2 type units: as long as there is 1 unfinished task in the month, 1 point will be deducted, and a maximum of 6 points will be deducted. C type units: as long as there is 1 unfinished task in the month, 2 points will be deducted, and a maximum of 6 points will be deducted.

[0191] The emergency management assessment module is used to obtain emergency plan data and determine the company's sub-score based on whether emergency plan data exists;

[0192] In this embodiment, emergency plan data is captured every month to determine whether it exists. For example, if there is no data in January, points will be deducted; if there is data in February, no points will be deducted. Although judgments are still made every month from March to December, no points will be deducted. If there is still no data in February, points will continue to be deducted in that month. The platform application scoring rule is that if there is no emergency plan data, 1 point will be deducted. The daily management comprehensive scoring rule is that as long as there is a point deduction in the platform application scoring rule, 0.5 points will be deducted.

[0193] Every month, the emergency drill plan data at the unit (branch, branch, or subsidiary) level is captured to determine whether it exists. For example, if there is no data in January, points will be deducted; if there is data in February, no points will be deducted. Although the judgment is still made every month from March to December, no points will be deducted. If there is still no data in February, points will continue to be deducted that month. The platform application scoring rule is that if there is no emergency drill plan data at the unit (branch, branch, or subsidiary) level, 1 point will be deducted. The daily management comprehensive scoring rule is that as long as there is a point deduction item in the platform application scoring rule, 0.5 points will be deducted.

[0194] Every month, unit-level drill preparation and implementation data is captured to determine whether there is any overdue. If there is, points will be deducted; if the number of attachments is incomplete, points will also be deducted. The platform application scoring rule is: as long as the monthly drill plan is overdue, 2 points will be directly deducted; for each missing one of the four types of attachments in the month, 1 point will be deducted, with a maximum deduction of 3 points. The daily management comprehensive scoring rule is that if there is a point deduction in the platform application scoring rule, 0.5 points will be deducted.

[0195] The company-level assessment score calculation module is used to add up the sub-scores of each company to determine the company-level assessment score.

[0196] Optionally, you can also conduct a project safety performance assessment and capture monthly project-level safety assessment score data. In the platform application scoring rules:

[0197] Score calculation: (100-average score of project safety assessment)*coefficient=actual deduction

[0198] If the number of projects owned by a production unit / branch or subsidiary is greater than or equal to 5, the coefficient is 0.15; if the number of projects is less than 5, the coefficient is 0.2. Note: The average score of the project safety assessment = the score of all projects / the number of projects.

[0199] The actual deduction points for this information technology are captured in the daily management comprehensive scoring rules. The actual deduction points are captured directly in the current month and then divided by 3 to obtain the final deduction points.

[0200] Optionally, you can also conduct a safety cost management assessment, capturing data on annual budget, safety cost accrual, safety cost plan, and safety cost usage every month. In the platform application scoring rules:

[0201] If there is no new data in the four items of budget, accrual, plan and utilization in that month, 2 points will be deducted.

[0202] If the withdrawal rate in the first half of the year is lower than the sequential progress (8% per month), 0.1 point will be deducted;

[0203] If the utilization rate in the first half of the year is lower than the scheduled progress (8% per month), 0.2 points will be deducted;

[0204] If the withdrawal rate in the second half of the year is lower than the sequential progress (8% per month), 0.2 points will be deducted;

[0205] If the utilization rate in the second half of the year is lower than the scheduled progress (8% per month), 0.5 points will be deducted;

[0206] This rule also applies to the production department.

[0207] Daily management comprehensive scoring rules:

[0208] If there is no new data in the monthly budget, accrual, plan, and usage in any of these four items in that month, 0.5 points will be deducted.

[0209] Effective deduction at the end of the year: The annual withdrawal rate is lower than the chronological progress or the utilization rate is lower than the chronological progress. If the annual withdrawal rate is lower than 80% of the chronological progress, 2 points will be deducted, and if the utilization rate is lower than 80% of the chronological progress, 2 points will be deducted. If the annual withdrawal rate reaches 81% to 99% of the chronological progress, 1 point will be deducted, and if the utilization rate reaches 81% to 99% of the chronological progress, 1 point will be deducted.

[0210] Optionally, you can also conduct a special equipment management assessment to check if any special equipment has overdue inspections every month. If the same equipment has been overdue for multiple consecutive months, points will be deducted every month. In the platform application scoring rules: if the special equipment has overdue inspections, 1 point will be deducted directly. In the daily management comprehensive scoring rules: if the special equipment has overdue inspections, 0.5 points will be deducted directly.

[0211] In order to implement the above embodiments, the present application also proposes an electronic device, comprising: a processor, and a memory communicatively connected to the processor; the memory stores computer-executable instructions; the processor executes the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory to implement the system provided by the above embodiments.

[0212] In order to implement the above embodiments, the present application also proposes a computer-readable storage medium, in which computer-executable instructions are stored. When the computer-executable instructions are executed by a processor, they are used to implement the system provided by the above embodiments.

[0213] In order to implement the above embodiments, the present application also proposes a computer program product, including a computer program, which implements the system provided by the above embodiments when executed by a processor.

[0214] The collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, provision and disclosure of user personal information involved in this application are in compliance with relevant laws and regulations and do not violate public order and good morals.

[0215] It should be noted that personal information from users should be collected for legitimate and reasonable purposes and should not be shared or sold outside of these legitimate uses. In addition, such collection / sharing should be carried out after receiving the user's informed consent, including but not limited to notifying the user to read the user agreement / user notice and sign the agreement / authorization including authorization of relevant user information before the user uses the function. In addition, any necessary steps should be taken to protect and safeguard access to such personal information data and ensure that others who have access to personal information data comply with its privacy policy and procedures.

[0216] The present application is expected to provide an implementation scheme for users to selectively block the use or access of personal information data. That is, the present disclosure is expected to provide hardware and / or software to prevent or block access to such personal information data. Once the personal information data is no longer needed, the risk can be minimized by limiting data collection and deleting the data. In addition, when applicable, such personal information is de-identified to protect the privacy of the user.

[0217] In the description of the aforementioned embodiments, the description with reference to the terms "one embodiment", "some embodiments", "example", "specific example", or "some examples" etc. means that the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present application. In this specification, the schematic representations of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described may be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner. In addition, those skilled in the art may combine and combine the different embodiments or examples described in this specification and the features of the different embodiments or examples, without contradiction.

[0218] In addition, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of the indicated technical features. Therefore, the features defined as "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of the features. In the description of this application, the meaning of "plurality" is at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise clearly and specifically defined.

[0219] Any process or method description in a flowchart or otherwise described herein may be understood to represent a module, fragment or portion of code comprising one or more executable instructions for implementing the steps of a custom logical function or process, and the scope of the preferred embodiments of the present application includes alternative implementations in which functions may not be performed in the order shown or discussed, including performing functions in a substantially simultaneous manner or in the reverse order depending on the functions involved, which should be understood by technicians in the technical field to which the embodiments of the present application belong.

[0220] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as an ordered list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by an instruction execution system, device or apparatus (such as a computer-based system, a system including a processor, or other system that can fetch instructions from an instruction execution system, device or apparatus and execute the instructions), or in combination with these instruction execution systems, devices or apparatuses. For the purpose of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any device that can contain, store, communicate, propagate or transmit a program for use by an instruction execution system, device or apparatus, or in combination with these instruction execution systems, devices or apparatuses. More specific examples of computer-readable media (a non-exhaustive list) include the following: an electrical connection with one or more wires (electronic device), a portable computer disk box (magnetic device), a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable and programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), a fiber optic device, and a portable compact disk read-only memory (CDROM). In addition, the computer-readable medium may even be paper or other suitable medium on which the program is printed, since the program may be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium and then editing, interpreting or processing in other suitable ways if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.

[0221] It should be understood that the various parts of the present application can be implemented by hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof. In the above-mentioned embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented by software or firmware stored in a memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented by hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented by any one of the following technologies known in the art or their combination: a discrete logic circuit having a logic gate circuit for implementing a logic function for a data signal, a dedicated integrated circuit having a suitable combination of logic gate circuits, a programmable gate array (PGA), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), etc.

[0222] A person skilled in the art may understand that all or part of the steps in the method for implementing the above-mentioned embodiment may be completed by instructing related hardware through a program, and the program may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, which, when executed, includes one or a combination of the steps of the method embodiment.

[0223] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated into a processing module, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one module. The above-mentioned integrated module may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of a software functional module. If the integrated module is implemented in the form of a software functional module and sold or used as an independent product, it may also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.

[0224] The storage medium mentioned above may be a read-only memory, a magnetic disk or an optical disk, etc. Although the embodiments of the present application have been shown and described above, it can be understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and cannot be understood as limiting the present application. A person of ordinary skill in the art may change, modify, replace and modify the above embodiments within the scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A hierarchical safety performance automatic assessment system, characterized in that: include: Daily inspection and performance assessment module, project-level safety performance assessment module, company-level safety performance assessment module, assessment item custom maintenance module, and safety cockpit display module; The daily inspection and performance assessment module is used to record and process daily safety inspection data, and identify violations based on the daily safety inspection data to generate daily assessment scores; The project-level safety performance assessment module is used to send configuration information to the assessment item custom maintenance module to determine custom assessment items according to the characteristics and safety requirements of the project, and to assess the project safety inspection data within the project cycle according to the custom assessment items to obtain a project-level assessment score; The company-level safety performance assessment module is used to summarize the project-level assessment scores of various projects in the company, and conduct high-level assessments and evaluations to obtain company-level assessment scores; The assessment item custom maintenance module is used to flexibly add, modify or delete assessment items according to actual needs; The safety cockpit display module is respectively connected to the daily inspection performance assessment module, the project-level safety performance assessment module, and the company-level safety performance assessment module, and is used to obtain daily assessment scores, assessment item custom maintenance modules or safety cockpit display modules, and display them through a visual interface.

2. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that The daily inspection and performance assessment module includes: daily inspection module, weekly inspection module and monthly inspection module; The daily inspection module is used to capture the number of daily inspections that should be inspected and the number of daily inspections actually inspected, determine the number of daily inspections that should be inspected in the month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the first deduction item according to the number of daily inspections that should be inspected and the number of daily inspections actually inspected; The weekly inspection module is used to capture the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected and the number of weekly inspections actually inspected, determine the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected in that month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the second deduction item according to the number of weekly inspections that should be inspected and the number of weekly inspections actually inspected; The monthly inspection module is used to capture the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected and the number of monthly inspections actually inspected, determine the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected for that month according to the shutdown cycle system, and determine the third deduction item according to the number of monthly inspections that should be inspected and the number of monthly inspections actually inspected; The daily assessment scoring module is used to determine the daily assessment score based on the total score and the first deduction item, the second deduction item, and the third deduction item.

3. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that The project-level safety performance assessment module includes: The project fetching module is used to obtain the name and type of each project from the project list; A project assessment item acquisition module is used to obtain the assessment items corresponding to the current project type from the assessment item custom maintenance module; The project evaluation module is used to determine the project-level evaluation score based on the evaluation items and project information corresponding to the current project.

4. The system according to claim 3, characterized in that The project assessment module includes: A security access assessment module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the security access completion status; a project summary evaluation module, for determining a project sub-score according to the number of columns of the project summary; The project unit personnel information evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the number of project unit personnel information columns; The construction organization design and construction plan evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score according to the number of columns of the construction organization design and construction plan; A project-related unit assessment module is used to determine the project sub-score based on whether a project-related unit exists; The dangerous and major project management assessment module is used to determine the project sub-scores based on the dangerous and major project management situation; Civilized construction evaluation module, used to determine project sub-scores based on civilized construction conditions; The personnel list evaluation module is used to determine the project sub-score based on the personnel entry of the general contractor and subcontractor; Personnel presence evaluation module, used to determine the project sub-score based on the number of personnel presence data input; The project-level assessment score calculation module is used to add up the sub-scores of each project to determine the project-level assessment score.

5. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that The company-level safety performance assessment module includes: A company type acquisition module is used to acquire the company type, wherein the subordinate unit types include B1 type, B2 type and C type; A company-level assessment item acquisition module is used to obtain the assessment items corresponding to the current company type from the assessment item custom maintenance module; The company-level evaluation module is used to obtain company information and to evaluate the company information and the evaluation items corresponding to the current company type to obtain the company-level evaluation score.

6. The system according to claim 5, characterized in that The company-level assessment modules include: The legal and regulatory assessment module is used to capture the legal and regulatory document data of B1 and B2 type companies every quarter, and determine the company's sub-score based on the newly added legal and regulatory documents; The rules and regulations assessment module is used to obtain the rules and regulations document data every quarter and determine the company's sub-score based on the addition of rules and regulations documents; The project quantity assessment module is used to compare the number of project departments in the monthly safety organization with the number of projects in the project record, and determine the company's sub-score based on the difference between the number of project departments and the number of projects; The personnel information completeness assessment module is used to obtain the organizational structure and personnel information of each company and determine the company sub-score based on the number of information items; Safety training assessment module, used to obtain the number of safety training plan reports and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of reports; A safety culture publicity assessment module is used to obtain the number of safety culture publicity articles and determine the company sub-score according to the number of safety culture publicity articles; The safety target assessment module is used to obtain the safety production responsibility statement data at the branch, subsidiary or employee level, and determine the company's sub-score based on the update of the safety production responsibility statement.

7. The system according to claim 6, characterized in that The company-level assessment module also includes: The safety meeting assessment module is used to obtain data on department-level and unit-level safety meetings and determine company sub-scores based on monthly safety meetings; The occupational health management assessment module is used to obtain the data in the occupational health management menu and determine the company sub-score according to the number of items in the occupational health management menu; The third-level safety training assessment module is used to obtain the employee's training participation status when there is a job or department transfer or a new employee is added, and determine the company's sub-score based on whether all training has been completed; The hidden danger investigation and treatment assessment module is used to obtain data on hidden dangers that have not been rectified within the time limit during general inspections and inspections by leading cadres, and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of hidden dangers that have not been rectified within the time limit; The leadership inspection and assessment module is used to obtain the monthly and quarterly inspection data of leadership cadres and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of inspections each leader has conducted that month; The safety work task assessment module is used to obtain the monthly safety work task overdue and unfinished situation, and determine the company's sub-score based on the number of safety work tasks overdue and unfinished; The emergency management assessment module is used to obtain emergency plan data and determine the company's sub-score based on whether emergency plan data exists; The company-level assessment score calculation module is used to add up the sub-scores of each company to determine the company-level assessment score.

8. An electronic device, characterized in that: include: A processor, and a memory communicatively connected to the processor; The memory stores computer-executable instructions; The processor executes the computer-executable instructions stored in the memory to implement the system according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

9. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores computer-executable instructions, and when the computer-executable instructions are executed by a processor, they are used to implement the system according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer program product, characterized in that The invention comprises a computer program, which implements the system according to any one of claims 1 to 7 when being executed by a processor.

Images