Question bank updating method for talent evaluation, computer program product and talent evaluation system

Abstract

The invention provides a question bank updating method for talent evaluation, a computer program product and a talent evaluation system, and the method comprises the following steps: outputting multi-dimensional evaluation questions related to talent evaluation to a user for answering, and obtaining an answering result of the user; generating multiple evaluation indexes related to the occupational quality of the user according to the answer result of the user, inputting the evaluation indexes into a preset talent evaluation model, and generating a talent evaluation report with the occupational quality data of the user through the talent evaluation model; talent evaluation reports of the multiple users are obtained, and the perfection degree and the reasonability degree of the evaluation question bank are analyzed according to the talent evaluation reports of the multiple users; and judging whether the perfection degree and the rationality of the evaluation question bank respectively reach the standard, and if the perfection degree or the rationality of the evaluation question bank does not reach the standard, obtaining a new evaluation question to update and iterate the evaluation question bank.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of data processing technology, and in particular to a method for updating a question bank for talent assessment, a computer program product and a talent assessment system. Background Art

[0002] The current job market is highly competitive. When traditional recruitment systems match employees with corporate positions, they generally simply screen the basic conditions such as occupation, education, work experience, salary, etc. between the employees and the corporate positions, and then match them. Factors such as values, personal style, and development tendencies are ignored, making it difficult to match people with positions comprehensively and accurately. Moreover, after such a simple screening, the number of matching positions will be relatively large, and employees need to spend time and energy to further select positions before they can find the ones that suit them.

[0003] There is a talent assessment system that uses questions and answers to assess employees' values, personal style, development tendencies, etc., so that employees can quickly find suitable positions based on the assessment results. However, the assessment question bank of the talent assessment system is pre-set, has certain limitations, and cannot be adaptively updated according to actual conditions. Summary of the invention

[0004] The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is how to conveniently update the evaluation question bank of the talent evaluation system.

[0005] In order to solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides a method for updating a question bank for talent assessment, comprising the following steps:

[0006] A. Output multiple dimensions of talent assessment questions to users and obtain their answers;

[0007] B. Generate multiple evaluation indicators related to the user's professional quality based on the user's answer results, input each evaluation indicator into a preset talent evaluation model, and generate a talent evaluation report with the user's professional quality data through the talent evaluation model;

[0008] C. Obtain talent assessment reports from multiple users, and analyze the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank based on the talent assessment reports from multiple users;

[0009] D. Determine whether the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank meet the standards. If the completeness or rationality of the assessment question bank does not meet the standards, obtain new assessment questions to update and iterate the assessment question bank.

[0010] Furthermore, in step D, if the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank meet the standards, the assessment question bank remains unchanged.

[0011] Furthermore, in step A, the dimensions of the output evaluation questions include values, personal style, self-evaluation of abilities, development tendency, and personal strengths.

[0012] Furthermore, in the step D, it is determined whether the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank meets the standard. Specifically, it is analyzed whether there are more than five assessment questions corresponding to each dimension in the talent assessment report. If so, it is determined that the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank meets the standard; if not, it is determined that the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank does not meet the standard.

[0013] Furthermore, in the step D, whether the rationality of the assessment question bank meets the standards is judged specifically: for each user's talent assessment report, multiple behavioral data of the user in the process of answering questions are obtained, and the multiple behavioral data include answering time and answering options; whether there are abnormalities in the multiple behavioral data of the user in the process of answering questions, and if there are abnormalities, anti-counterfeiting prompts are generated for the talent assessment report of the user; the proportion of talent assessment reports with anti-counterfeiting prompts to all talent assessment reports is calculated, if the proportion exceeds a preset value, it is judged that the rationality of the assessment question bank does not meet the standards, if the proportion does not exceed the preset value, it is judged that the rationality of the assessment question bank meets the standards.

[0014] Furthermore, in step D, the answering time obtained includes the total answering time and the answering interval time between any two questions. If the total answering time is less than the preset total time, or the answering interval time between any two questions is greater than the preset interval time, or there is a contradiction between the answer options, or the answer options deviate from basic common sense, then it is judged that there are abnormalities in multiple behavioral data of the user during the answering process.

[0015] Furthermore, in step A, before outputting the assessment questions to the user to answer, the user's basic employment information is obtained.

[0016] The present invention also provides a computer program product, including a computer program, wherein the computer program implements the steps in the above method when executed by a processor.

[0017] The present invention also provides a talent assessment system, which is characterized in that it includes a main control module, the main control module is connected to the user's interactive device through a server, the main control module includes a memory and a processor connected to each other, and the memory stores the above-mentioned computer program product; in step A, multiple dimensional assessment questions related to talent assessment are output to the user through the interactive device, and the user's answer results are obtained through the interactive device.

[0018] Furthermore, the interactive device is an intelligent electronic device with a real-time interactive function, and the intelligent electronic device is a mobile phone, a desktop computer, a laptop computer or a tablet computer.

[0019] The present invention has the following beneficial effects: when conducting talent assessment, talent assessment reports of multiple users are obtained, and the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank are analyzed according to the talent assessment reports of the multiple users, and it is determined whether the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank meet the standards respectively. If the completeness or rationality of the assessment question bank does not meet the standards, it means that the assessment question bank needs to be updated, so new assessment questions are obtained to update and iterate the assessment question bank. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0020] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of a method for updating a question bank for talent assessment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0021] The present invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with specific implementation methods.

[0022] The present invention provides a talent assessment system, which includes a main control module, which is connected to a user's interactive device through a server, wherein the interactive device is an intelligent electronic device with a real-time interactive function, such as a mobile phone, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a tablet computer, etc. The main control module includes a memory and a processor connected to each other, wherein a computer program product including a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the following is realized: Figure 1 The steps in the method for updating the question bank of talent assessment shown specifically include the following steps A, B, C, and D.

[0023] A. Output multiple dimensions of talent assessment-related assessment questions to users and obtain their answer results.

[0024] When using the talent assessment system, users need to first use the interactive device to input their basic employment information, including name, occupation, education, work experience, salary, etc. The main control module can then obtain the basic employment information entered by the user through the server. The main control module then outputs multiple dimension assessment questions related to talent assessment through the interactive device for the user to answer. Each dimension has multiple assessment questions. After the user answers the assessment questions on the interactive device, the main control module obtains the user's answer results through the interactive device. Among them, the dimensions of the assessment questions output through the interactive device include values, personal style, self-assessment of ability, development tendency, and own advantages.

[0025] An example of an evaluation question for the value dimension is: list multiple words that reflect different values ​​for users to choose from the words that they possess the most or admire the most; list several words selected by the user for users to sort. An example of an evaluation question for the personal style dimension is: list at least two options that reflect opposite personal styles for users to choose. An example of an evaluation question for the ability self-assessment dimension is: list multiple words that reflect different abilities for users to choose from the words that they possess the most or admire the most; list several words selected by the user for users to sort. An example of an evaluation question for the development tendency dimension is: list at least two options that reflect opposite development tendencies for users to choose. An example of an evaluation question for the own advantage dimension is: list at least two options that reflect opposite advantages for users to choose.

[0026] B. Generate multiple evaluation indicators related to the user's professional quality based on the user's answer results, input each evaluation indicator into a preset talent evaluation model, and generate a talent evaluation report with the user's professional quality data through the talent evaluation model.

[0027] After obtaining the user's answer results, the main control module generates multiple evaluation indicators related to the user's professional qualities based on the user's answer results. These evaluation indicators correspond to the various dimensions of the evaluation questions, including evaluation indicators of the value dimension, evaluation indicators of the personal style dimension, evaluation indicators of the ability self-assessment dimension, evaluation indicators of the development tendency dimension, and evaluation indicators of the own advantage dimension. Then the main control module inputs each evaluation indicator into the preset talent evaluation model. The talent evaluation model generates a talent evaluation report with the user's professional quality data based on the user's multiple different dimensional evaluation indicators related to the professional quality. The talent evaluation report combines the user's values, personal style, ability self-assessment, development tendency, and own advantages to give the user a suitable position type.

[0028] C. Obtain talent assessment reports for multiple users.

[0029] After multiple users use the talent assessment system, the talent assessment system will generate talent assessment reports for multiple users, and the main control module will obtain talent assessment reports for multiple users. Since these talent assessment reports are obtained after different users answer questions, these assessment reports are different, and users will generate multiple behavioral data in the process of answering assessment questions, and these behavioral data are also different.

[0030] D. Determine whether the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank meet the standards based on the talent assessment reports of multiple users. If the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank do not meet the standards, obtain new assessment questions to update and iterate the assessment question bank.

[0031] After obtaining the talent assessment reports of multiple users, the main control module determines whether the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank meet the standards respectively according to the talent assessment reports of multiple users. Specifically, judging whether the completeness of the assessment question bank meets the standards is: analyzing whether there are more than five assessment questions corresponding to each dimension in the talent assessment report. If so, it is judged that the completeness of the assessment question bank meets the standards; if not, it is judged that the completeness of the assessment question bank does not meet the standards.

[0032] Determine whether the rationality of the assessment question bank meets the standards. Specifically: During the process of users answering assessment questions, multiple behavioral data will be generated according to the user's answering behavior, such as the total answering time, the answering interval between any two questions, and the user's answering options. After generating talent assessment reports for multiple users, obtain multiple behavioral data of the user in the answering process for each user's talent assessment report. The obtained multiple behavioral data include answering time and answering options, where the answering time includes the total answering time and the answering interval between any two questions; then determine whether there are abnormalities in the multiple behavioral data of the user in the answering process, specifically: determine whether the total answering time is less than the preset total time, determine whether the answering interval between any two questions is greater than the preset interval, determine whether there is a contradiction between the answering options, and determine whether the answering options are contrary to basic common sense. If the total time for answering questions is less than the preset total time, or the interval between any two questions is greater than the preset interval, or there is a contradiction between the answer options, or the answer options are contrary to basic common sense, then it is judged that there are abnormalities in the multiple behavioral data of the user in the process of answering questions. If the total time for answering questions is not less than the preset total time, and the interval between any two questions is not greater than the preset interval, and there is no contradiction between the answer options, and the answer options are not contrary to basic common sense, then it is judged that there are no abnormalities in the multiple behavioral data of the user in the process of answering questions. If it is judged that there are abnormalities in the multiple behavioral data of the user in the process of answering questions, it means that the user may answer questions at random, so the main control module generates an anti-counterfeiting prompt for the talent assessment report of the user. Then calculate the proportion of talent assessment reports with anti-counterfeiting prompts to all talent assessment reports. If the proportion exceeds the preset value, it is judged that the rationality of the assessment question bank does not meet the standard. If the proportion does not exceed the preset value, it is judged that the rationality of the assessment question bank meets the standard.

[0033] When it is determined that the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank does not meet the standard, or when it is determined that the degree of rationality of the assessment question bank does not meet the standard, it means that the assessment question bank needs to be updated, so the main control module obtains new assessment questions to update and iterate the assessment question bank. When it is determined that the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank meets the standard, and when it is determined that the degree of rationality of the assessment question bank meets the standard, it means that there is no need to update the assessment question bank, so the main control module keeps the assessment question bank unchanged. It should be noted that the main control module obtains new assessment questions to update and iterate the assessment question bank, specifically by outputting update requirement information and specific information that the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank does not meet the standard or the degree of rationality does not meet the standard to the managers of the talent assessment system through an interactive device. After the managers of the talent assessment system enter new assessment questions accordingly, the main control module can obtain new assessment questions to update and iterate the assessment question bank.

[0034] The above is only an implementation method of the invention, and does not limit the scope of patent protection. Those skilled in the art can make non-substantial changes or substitutions based on the invention, which still fall within the scope of patent protection.

Claims

1. A method for updating a question bank for talent assessment, characterized in that: The steps include: A. Output multiple dimensions of talent assessment questions to users and obtain their answers; B. Generate multiple evaluation indicators related to the user's professional quality based on the user's answer results, input each evaluation indicator into a preset talent evaluation model, and generate a talent evaluation report with the user's professional quality data through the talent evaluation model; C. Obtain talent assessment reports for multiple users; D. Determine whether the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank meet the standards based on the talent assessment reports of multiple users. If the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank do not meet the standards, obtain new assessment questions to update and iterate the assessment question bank.

2. The method for updating the question bank of talent assessment according to claim 1, characterized in that: In the step D, if the completeness and rationality of the assessment question bank meet the requirements, the assessment question bank remains unchanged.

3. The method for updating the question bank of talent assessment according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step A, the dimensions of the output evaluation questions include values, personal style, self-evaluation of abilities, development tendency, and personal strengths.

4. The method for updating the question bank of talent assessment according to claim 3, characterized in that: In the step D, whether the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank meets the standard is determined specifically by analyzing whether there are more than five assessment questions corresponding to each dimension in the talent assessment report. If so, it is determined that the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank meets the standard; if not, it is determined that the degree of perfection of the assessment question bank does not meet the standard.

5. The method for updating the question bank of talent assessment according to claim 1, characterized in that: In the step D, whether the rationality of the assessment question bank meets the standard is determined specifically by: for each user's talent assessment report, obtaining multiple behavioral data of the user in the process of answering questions, wherein the multiple behavioral data include the time of answering questions and the answering options; determining whether there are abnormalities in the multiple behavioral data of the user in the process of answering questions, and if there are abnormalities, generating an anti-counterfeiting prompt for the talent assessment report of the user; Calculate the ratio of talent assessment reports with anti-counterfeiting tips to all talent assessment reports. If the ratio exceeds the preset value, the rationality of the assessment question bank is judged to be substandard. If the ratio does not exceed the preset value, the rationality of the assessment question bank is judged to be substandard.

6. The method for updating the question bank of talent assessment according to claim 5, characterized in that: In step D, the answering time obtained includes the total answering time and the answering interval time between any two questions. If the total answering time is less than the preset total time, or the answering interval time between any two questions is greater than the preset interval time, or there is a contradiction between the answer options, or the answer options deviate from basic common sense, then it is judged that there are abnormalities in multiple behavioral data of the user during the answering process.

7. The method for updating the question bank of talent assessment according to claim 1, characterized in that: In step A, before outputting the assessment questions to the user to answer, the user's basic employment information is obtained.

8. A computer program product comprising a computer program, characterized in that When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps in the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

9. A talent assessment system, characterized in that: It includes a main control module, which is connected to the user's interactive device through a server, and the main control module includes a memory and a processor connected to each other, and the memory stores the computer program product according to claim 8; in the step A, multiple dimensional assessment questions related to talent assessment are output to the user through the interactive device, and the user's answer results are obtained through the interactive device.

10. The talent assessment system according to claim 9, characterized in that: The interactive device is an intelligent electronic device with a real-time interactive function, and the intelligent electronic device is a mobile phone, a desktop computer, a laptop computer or a tablet computer.

Images