Power enterprise engineering project safety problem special improvement evaluation method and system

Abstract

The invention discloses a power enterprise engineering project safety problem special improvement evaluation method and system, and relates to the technical field of data processing. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring historical operation information of a plurality of engineering projects in a to-be-evaluated power enterprise; determining a high-frequency violation project based on the number of times of ticket-free operation in each piece of historical operation information; receiving current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation project, performing safety evaluation on the construction data and the equipment operation and maintenance data according to a preset safety operation index, and determining a to-be-rectified safety problem in the high-frequency violation project; determining power equipment associated with the safety problem to be rectified; and generating an evaluation report of the high-frequency violation project in combination with the safety problem to be rectified and the principal information corresponding to the power equipment. By implementing the technical scheme provided by the invention, the effect of improving the efficiency of special improvement and evaluation of the safety problem of the engineering project of the power enterprise is achieved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of data processing technology, and specifically to a method, system, electronic equipment and storage medium for special rectification and assessment of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid development of my country's power industry, the number and scale of power enterprise projects have continued to expand. In this process, ensuring the safety of engineering projects has become a top priority for power enterprise management. The safety of engineering projects is not only related to the economic benefits of the enterprise, but also directly affects the stable operation of the power system and the safety of life and property of the public.

[0003] At present, the existing special rectification assessment method for power enterprise project safety issues relies on regular safety assessment of all power enterprise projects. However, in actual application, due to the large number of projects in power enterprises, regular safety assessment of all projects takes a lot of assessment time, and it is often difficult to conduct targeted assessments on projects with high incidence of violations, resulting in low efficiency of special rectification assessment of power enterprise project safety issues. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present application provides a method, system, electronic equipment and storage medium for special rectification and assessment of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, which has the effect of improving the efficiency of special rectification and assessment of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects.

[0005] In the first aspect, the present application provides a method for evaluating special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, including: Obtain historical operation information of multiple engineering projects in the power company to be evaluated; Based on the number of operations without tickets in each of the historical operation information, determine the high-frequency violation items; Receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation project, and perform safety assessment on the construction data and the equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to determine the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation project; Determine the power equipment associated with the safety issue to be rectified; An assessment report on the high-frequency violation items is generated by combining the safety issues to be rectified and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment.

[0006] In a second aspect of the present application, a special rectification and evaluation system for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects is provided, the system comprising: An information acquisition module is used to obtain historical operation information of multiple engineering projects in the power enterprise to be evaluated; A project identification module, used to determine high-frequency violation projects based on the number of unticketed operations in each of the historical operation information; A safety problem determination module is used to receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation project, and perform safety assessment on the construction data and the equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to determine the safety problems to be rectified in the high-frequency violation project; The safety assessment module is used to determine the power equipment associated with the safety problem to be rectified; and generate an assessment report of the high-frequency violation items by combining the safety problem to be rectified and the person-in-charge information corresponding to the power equipment.

[0007] In a third aspect of the present application, an electronic device is provided, comprising a memory, a processor, and a program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the program, when loaded and executed by the processor, can implement a method for special rectification and assessment of safety issues in engineering projects of electric power enterprises.

[0008] In a fourth aspect of the present application, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the processor implements a special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of engineering projects of electric power enterprises.

[0009] In summary, one or more technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present application have at least the following technical effects or advantages: By adopting the above technical solutions, historical operation information can be obtained, high-frequency violation projects can be identified, and a more targeted assessment of the problem can be achieved. By receiving the real-time construction and operation and maintenance data of the project, the assessment is carried out according to the preset safety operation indicators to make the results more accurate and objective, determine the power equipment and person in charge associated with the problem, and establish a corresponding relationship between the problem and the equipment and personnel. Finally, a special assessment report for high-frequency violation projects is formed to provide a basis for subsequent rectification. Use the preset safety operation indicators to improve the standardization of the assessment. Establish the corresponding relationship between the safety issues to be rectified and the power equipment and person in charge to make the assessment more comprehensive. The assessment report formed reflects the existing problems and provides a reference for suggestions for rectification. The overall special assessment method for high-frequency violation projects is adopted to make the rectification more targeted, avoiding the repeated assessment of all engineering projects, which consumes a lot of time, thereby improving the efficiency of the special rectification assessment of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of a special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects provided in an embodiment of the present application; Figure 2 It is a structural diagram of a special rectification and evaluation system for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects provided in an embodiment of the present application; Figure 3 It is a structural schematic diagram of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0011] Description of reference numerals: 300, electronic device; 301, processor; 302, communication bus; 303, user interface; 304, network interface; 305, memory. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0012] In order to enable technicians in this field to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this application, not all of the embodiments.

[0013] In the description of the embodiments of the present application, words such as "for example" or "for example" are used to indicate examples, illustrations or explanations. Any embodiment or design described as "for example" or "for example" in the embodiments of the present application should not be interpreted as being more preferred or more advantageous than other embodiments or designs. Specifically, the use of words such as "for example" or "for example" is intended to present related concepts in a specific way.

[0014] In the description of the embodiments of the present application, the meaning of the term "multiple" refers to two or more. For example, multiple systems refer to two or more systems, and multiple screen terminals refer to two or more screen terminals. In addition, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the indicated technical features. Thus, the features defined as "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of the features. The terms "include", "comprise", "have" and their variations all mean "including but not limited to", unless otherwise specifically emphasized.

[0015] This application embodiment provides a method for evaluating special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects. In one embodiment, please refer to Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects provided in an embodiment of the present application. The method can be implemented by a computer program, which can be integrated in an application or run as an independent tool application. The method can also be implemented by a single-chip microcomputer or run on a special rectification and assessment system for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects based on the von Neumann system. Specifically, the method can include the following steps: Step 101: Obtain historical operation information of multiple engineering projects in the power enterprise to be evaluated.

[0016] The historical operation information refers to the relevant data of the operation activities of each project of the power enterprise within a certain time range in the past. In the embodiment of the present application, the historical operation information can be understood as the operation tickets of each project in the past year, including operation tickets, work tickets, etc.

[0017] Specifically, in order to improve the pertinence and accuracy of the special rectification of safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, it is necessary to obtain the historical operation information of each engineering project before the assessment to find the weak links in safety management. The enterprise information management system can be used to extract the operation ticket information uploaded by each project department, including operation tickets, work tickets, accident statistics, etc. These operation tickets will record the time, location, participants, operation content, approval status and other information of each operation. Among them, unticketed operation is one of the important safety risk indicators. After obtaining these historical operation information, the number of unticketed operations for each engineering project can be counted to determine the frequency of its illegal operations. Projects with too high a number of unticketed operations indicate that the project has obvious problems in safety management and is a high-risk project, which should be the priority assessment object. This way of obtaining historical operation information can quickly locate high-risk projects that power companies focus on, thereby improving the accuracy and effectiveness of subsequent safety assessments, focusing assessment resources more on key projects, and providing a basis for subsequent rectification of project security loopholes.

[0018] Step 102: Based on the number of ticketless operations in each historical operation information, determine the high-frequency violation items.

[0019] The number of operations without tickets refers to the total number of illegal operations without operation tickets or work tickets performed by various engineering project departments in the historical operation information. In the embodiments of the present application, the number of operations without tickets can be understood as the statistical number of operations without operation tickets performed by various projects in the past year.

[0020] Frequently violating projects refer to engineering projects that have a high number of unticketed operations and serious violations of safety operation specifications in the statistical analysis of historical operation information. In the embodiments of the present application, frequently violating projects can be understood as projects whose number of unticketed operations exceeds a preset threshold. This indicates that these projects frequently violate regulations in daily operations and pose a greater safety hazard.

[0021] Specifically, in order to improve the efficiency of the use of limited safety management resources of power companies, it is necessary to prioritize the identification of high-risk engineering projects that need rectification the most. This goal can be effectively achieved based on the number of unticketed operations. Unticketed operations directly reflect the safety management level of the project and the safety awareness of the operators. The more times, the more serious the problem. First, the total number of historical unticketed operations of each project is counted, and the average number of unticketed operations is calculated; then, according to the enterprise risk control requirements, a standard threshold for the number of unticketed operations is set, which can be obtained by multiplying the preset coefficient with the average number; finally, the actual number of unticketed operations of each project is compared with the threshold, and the projects with a number greater than or equal to the threshold are determined as high-frequency violation projects. Using this quantitative method based on the judgment of the number of unticketed operations, the identification of high-frequency violation projects can be made more accurate, with data speaking and reducing subjective influence. These high-frequency violation projects will be the focus of rectification, and targeted safety inspections and detailed rectification measures will be formulated to quickly eliminate safety hazards, so that resources can be concentrated to improve rectification efficiency.

[0022] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional embodiment, in step 102: determining the high-frequency violation items based on the number of ticketless operations in each historical operation information, this step may also include the following steps: Step 201: Based on the number of operations without tickets, the average number of operations without tickets for each project is calculated; the average number of operations without tickets is multiplied by a preset coefficient to obtain a threshold value for the number of operations without tickets.

[0023] The preset coefficient refers to a coefficient value used to magnify the average number of ticketless operations when calculating the threshold number of ticketless operations. In the embodiment of the present application, the preset coefficient can be understood as a constant multiple predetermined by the enterprise according to its own safety management requirements, such as 1.5 times or 2 times. The purpose of setting this preset coefficient is to increase the strictness of the final judgment threshold by magnifying the average number of ticketless operations, so as to encourage enterprises to further strengthen safety management and reduce the risk of ticketless operations.

[0024] The threshold of the number of unticketed operations refers to the threshold standard of the number of unticketed operations for judging whether a project belongs to a high-frequency violation project. In the embodiment of the present application, the threshold of the number of unticketed operations can be understood as a judgment standard of the number of unticketed operations obtained by multiplying the average number of unticketed operations by a preset coefficient.

[0025] Specifically, in order to identify high-frequency violation projects, it is necessary to formulate a judgment standard for the number of unticketed operations that combines the industry average and the enterprise's risk tolerance, that is, a threshold. First, the total number of historical unticketed operations for all engineering projects is counted, and the average number of unticketed operations is calculated to reflect the general level of the industry. Then, based on its own risk management and control capabilities, the enterprise pre-sets an amplification factor, that is, a preset factor, and multiplies it with the average number to obtain the final threshold for the number of unticketed operations. If the number of unticketed operations on a project exceeds this threshold, it can be clearly determined as a high-risk project, and safety hazards will be rectified as a priority. This method of setting thresholds can ensure that the largest number of high-frequency violation projects are identified and centralized rectification is carried out.

[0026] Step 202: Compare the number of unticketed operations of each project with the threshold number of unticketed operations; if the number of unticketed operations of the project is greater than or equal to the threshold number of unticketed operations, the project is determined to be a high-frequency violation project.

[0027] Specifically, after determining the judgment threshold for the number of unticketed operations, it is necessary to judge each engineering project according to a unified standard to identify high-frequency violation projects. Compare the actual total number of unticketed operations of each project department with the pre-determined threshold for the number of unticketed operations one by one. If the number of unticketed operations of a project is greater than or equal to the threshold, the project can be directly judged as a high-frequency violation project with too many unticketed operations. By using this comparison method with the standard threshold, the judgment criteria for high-risk projects can be unified and the influence of subjective factors can be reduced. By distinguishing those projects with serious unticketed operations, subsequent safety rectification can focus more resources on these key projects, quickly eliminate hidden dangers, and help urge each project department to pay attention to safety management and reduce unauthorized unticketed operations.

[0028] Step 103: Receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation projects, and conduct a safety assessment on the construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to determine the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects.

[0029] The construction data refers to data reflecting safety information during the construction of the project. In the embodiments of the present application, the construction data can be understood as data such as qualification information of project construction personnel and the implementation of various safety protection measures.

[0030] Equipment operation and maintenance data refers to relevant data that reflects the operation and maintenance status of equipment in engineering projects. In the embodiments of the present application, equipment operation and maintenance data can be understood as data such as equipment operating parameters, maintenance records, and test reports. The purpose of obtaining equipment operation and maintenance data is to evaluate whether the project equipment is operated and maintained in a standardized manner, detect safety hazards during the equipment operation and maintenance process, and find problems that need to be rectified.

[0031] Safety issues to be rectified refer to those issues that do not meet safety regulations and are detected through analysis of project construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data. In the embodiments of the present application, safety issues to be rectified can be understood as those problems in construction and equipment operation and maintenance that are found to not meet preset safety operation indicators. The purpose of identifying these safety issues to be rectified is to find the safety hazards and improvement points of the project, so as to carry out targeted rectification of safety hazards.

[0032] Specifically, after identifying the high-frequency violation projects, it is also necessary to clarify the specific safety hazards of these projects in order to carry out targeted rectification. To this end, it is necessary to obtain the current construction and equipment operation and maintenance data of the project, because these data can reflect the real-time safety status of the project. Then, according to the various safety operation specification indicators pre-set by the enterprise, such as operator qualification certificates, equipment inspection reports and other requirements, these indicators are compared and analyzed with the actual project data to determine whether there are any situations that do not meet the safety regulations. Once a problem that does not meet the regulations is found, such as detecting that the equipment has not been maintained for a long time, or the construction personnel do not have relevant operating qualifications, it will be identified as a safety hazard to be rectified.

[0033] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional embodiment, in step 103: performing safety assessment on construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to determine safety issues to be rectified in high-frequency violation projects, this step may also include the following steps: Step 301: Determine the construction personnel qualification compliance rate based on the construction personnel qualification data, and determine the safety protection measures implementation rate based on the safety protection measures execution data.

[0034] Among them, the construction personnel qualification data refers to the relevant data reflecting the professional qualifications of the project construction personnel. In the embodiments of the present application, the construction personnel qualification data can be understood as the operation qualification certificates, professional registration information and other data held by the construction personnel. The purpose of obtaining the construction personnel qualification data is to evaluate whether the project construction personnel meet the qualification requirements and whether there are hidden risks in production safety.

[0035] The personnel qualification compliance rate refers to the ratio of construction personnel holding relevant operation qualification certificates to the total number of construction personnel during the construction of the project. In the embodiments of the present application, the personnel qualification compliance rate can be understood as the ratio of the number of construction personnel with professional operation qualifications to the total number of personnel in a certain project or time period.

[0036] Safety protection measures execution data refers to data reflecting the implementation of various safety protection measures during the construction of the project. In the embodiment of the present application, the safety protection measures execution data can be understood as data such as guardrail setting records and hot work safety inspection reports.

[0037] The implementation rate of safety protection measures refers to the ratio of the number of safety protection measures that have been implemented to the total number of planned settings during the construction of the project. In the embodiments of the present application, the implementation rate of safety protection measures can be understood as the ratio of the number of safety protection measures that have been implemented to the total number of protection measures for the project within a certain project or time period.

[0038] Specifically, in order to make the assessment of the project construction safety status more convincing and instructive, it is necessary to set clear quantitative indicators. Among them, the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of safety protection measures are two key indicators. First, the qualification certificate data of the project construction workers are counted, and the percentage of certificate holders to the total number of people is calculated as the qualification compliance rate. Then, the execution records of various safety protection measures such as protective fences are collected, and the ratio of the number of implemented measures to the total number of planned measures is calculated to obtain the implementation rate of protection measures. By evaluating these two quantitative indicators, it can be reflected whether there are safety hazards in the project in terms of staffing and equipment settings. If any compliance rate or implementation rate is too low, it is necessary to formulate a rectification plan for the corresponding link. Using this quantitative evaluation method is conducive to finding weak links for detailed rectification, thereby effectively improving the construction safety prevention and control level of power system engineering projects.

[0039] Step 302: Determine the equipment maintenance rate based on the equipment maintenance record data, and determine the equipment failure processing rate based on the equipment failure processing data.

[0040] Among them, the equipment maintenance record data refers to the relevant data reflecting the maintenance, inspection and repair of the project equipment. In the embodiment of the present application, the equipment maintenance record data can be understood as equipment routine inspection report, maintenance work record, maintenance log and other data.

[0041] The equipment maintenance rate refers to the ratio of the number of equipment that has completed standardized maintenance and repair to the total number of equipment during the operation and maintenance of the project. In the embodiments of the present application, the equipment maintenance rate can be understood as the ratio of the number of equipment that has completed maintenance and inspection within a certain project or time period to the total number of equipment in the project or system.

[0042] Equipment failure processing data refers to data reflecting the processing of equipment failures during operation and maintenance of the project. In the embodiments of the present application, equipment failure processing data can be understood as equipment failure reports, processing result records and other data.

[0043] The equipment failure handling rate refers to the ratio of the number of equipment failures that have been handled to the total number of failures that occurred during the operation and maintenance of the project equipment. In the embodiments of the present application, the equipment failure handling rate can be understood as the ratio of the number of equipment failures that have been handled to the total number of failures within a certain project or time period.

[0044] Specifically, in order to make the evaluation of the project equipment operation and maintenance status more convincing and instructive, it is necessary to set clear quantitative indicators. Among them, the equipment maintenance rate and equipment fault handling rate are two key indicators. First, count the equipment maintenance, inspection, and repair records, calculate the percentage of the number of equipment that has completed maintenance to the total number of equipment, and get the equipment maintenance rate. Then collect the processing result data after the equipment fails during operation and maintenance, and calculate the ratio of the number of processed faults to the total number of faults as the equipment fault handling rate. According to the measurement results of these two quantitative indicators, it can be intuitively judged whether there are problems in the project in terms of equipment maintenance and fault response. If any of the maintenance rate or handling rate is too low, it is necessary to improve the corresponding equipment operation and maintenance process and mechanism. This quantitative evaluation method can clarify the weak links in the project equipment operation and maintenance process, so as to propose targeted improvement measures.

[0045] Step 303: Determine the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects by combining the preset safety operation indicators, construction personnel qualification compliance rate, safety protection measures implementation rate, equipment maintenance rate and equipment failure handling rate.

[0046] Specifically, in order to clearly identify the specific safety hazards in high-frequency violation projects, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of the preset safety operation specification indicators and the actual execution data of the project. The safety operation indicators pre-set by the enterprise, such as the proportion of qualified personnel, are compared one by one with the actual personnel qualification compliance rate calculated by the project. If it is found that the compliance rate is lower than the prescribed indicator, or the equipment maintenance rate is not up to standard, it can be determined that there is a safety hazard risk and rectification is required. Through this quantitative indicator comparison method, the specific safety loopholes in personnel, equipment, and operation processes of high-frequency violation projects can be found, making the rectification measures more targeted. It is also possible to determine the rectification priority according to different projects to promote proactive improvements in various project departments.

[0047] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional embodiment, in step 303: combining preset safety operation indicators, construction personnel qualification compliance rate, safety protection measures implementation rate, equipment maintenance rate and equipment failure handling rate, determining the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects, this step may also include the following steps: Step 313: The construction personnel qualification compliance rate and the safety protection measures implementation rate are used as indicator items and compared with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the construction safety index to obtain the construction safety assessment result.

[0048] Among them, the index item refers to the name of each specific index that constitutes the safety assessment index. In the embodiment of the present application, the index item can be understood as a number of specific safety management indicators such as the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of safety protection measures. These index items are set to quantitatively reflect various aspects or links of safety management work and compare them with standard thresholds to evaluate the safety status of the project.

[0049] Construction safety index refers to a series of quantitative indicators used to evaluate and monitor the safety status of the construction process of engineering projects. In the embodiments of the present application, the construction safety index can be understood as the assessment criteria for project construction safety management pre-established by the enterprise, including multiple specific indicator items and quantitative assessment index thresholds for construction personnel, equipment, operation processes, etc.

[0050] The construction safety assessment result refers to the assessment conclusion obtained after inspecting the actual construction safety status according to the project construction safety indicators. In the embodiments of the present application, the construction safety assessment result can be understood as a quantitative assessment report on the project construction safety status after comparing the actual construction personnel qualification compliance rate, protection measures implementation rate and other data with the safety indicator requirements.

[0051] Specifically, in order to make a quantitative and standardized assessment of the safety status of project construction, it is necessary to establish a complete safety indicator system and assessment process. The enterprise formulates a number of construction safety management indicators, including the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications and the implementation rate of safety protection measures, and sets the quantitative assessment standard for each indicator, that is, the indicator threshold. During the implementation of the project, the actual value of each indicator item is calculated and checked against the standard threshold. For example, if the actual compliance rate of the project's construction personnel qualifications reaches or exceeds the company's preset standard value, the indicator assessment is up to standard; similarly, the actual implementation rate of protective measures is compared with the standard value. Finally, the evaluation results of various indicators are combined to form a construction safety assessment report for the project. Through this quantitative indicator evaluation method, construction safety management can be more standardized, and it can be clarified in which safety management links of the project there are deficiencies or hidden dangers, so as to prevent and rectify them in a targeted manner.

[0052] Step 323: The equipment maintenance rate and the equipment failure handling rate are used as indicator items respectively and compared with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the equipment operation and maintenance safety indicator to obtain the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment result.

[0053] Among them, the equipment operation and maintenance safety index refers to a series of quantitative indicators used to evaluate and monitor the safety status of equipment operation and maintenance in engineering projects. In the embodiments of the present application, the equipment operation and maintenance safety index can be understood as the assessment criteria for project equipment maintenance and fault response management pre-established by the enterprise, including multiple specific equipment operation and maintenance safety management indicators such as equipment maintenance rate and fault handling rate and their quantitative assessment thresholds.

[0054] The equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment result refers to the assessment conclusion obtained after inspecting the actual equipment operation and maintenance safety status according to the project equipment operation and maintenance safety index. In the embodiment of the present application, the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment result can be understood as a quantitative assessment report on the project equipment operation and maintenance safety status after comparing the actual equipment maintenance rate, fault handling rate and other data of the project with the requirements of the safety index.

[0055] Specifically, in order to conduct a standardized and quantitative assessment of the safety status of project equipment operation and maintenance, it is necessary to establish a systematic and complete safety indicator system. The enterprise first formulates equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators, including specific indicator items such as equipment maintenance rate and fault handling rate, and gives quantitative assessment standards for each item, that is, thresholds. During project implementation, the actual values ​​of each item are calculated and compared with the standard thresholds one by one. For example, if the actual equipment maintenance rate of the project reaches or exceeds the preset standard value, the indicator assessment meets the standard; similarly, compare the actual fault handling rate with the standard value. Finally, the evaluation results of all indicator items are combined to form a project equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment report. By comparing with standard indicators, it can be judged whether there are safety hazards in the project in terms of equipment maintenance, fault response, etc., so as to improve the equipment operation and maintenance process and improve the equipment safety management level in a targeted manner.

[0056] Step 333: Determine the index items in the construction safety assessment results and the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment results that do not meet the preset safety operation indicators, and set the safety issues corresponding to the index items as safety issues to be rectified.

[0057] Specifically, in order to clearly identify the specific safety hazards in the project, it is necessary to make full use of the safety assessment results to guide safety rectification. First, based on the preset safety operation indicators, an assessment report on the project's construction safety and equipment operation and maintenance safety has been obtained. Then check each specific indicator in the assessment report one by one to determine whether its measured value meets the requirements of the safety indicator. For example, if the construction personnel's qualification compliance rate does not meet the standard, or the equipment failure handling rate is lower than the standard requirements, it can be considered that the project has safety hazards in the corresponding aspects. Finally, all specific indicator items that have not passed the safety indicator assessment are summarized as safety issues to be rectified for the project. By comparing with standard safety indicators, safety rectification can be more targeted.

[0058] Step 104: Determine the power equipment associated with the safety issues to be rectified; and generate an assessment report on high-frequency violation items based on the information of the person in charge of the safety issues to be rectified and the power equipment.

[0059] Among them, power equipment refers to various electrical facilities and electromechanical equipment used in power system engineering projects. In the embodiments of this application, power equipment can be understood as high-voltage switchgear, transformers, cables, monitoring systems and other power equipment directly related to power transmission, conversion and control. The purpose of clarifying power equipment is to be able to match safety hazards or problems with specific equipment and responsible persons during safety assessment.

[0060] The responsible person information refers to the information of the department and personnel responsible for operation, maintenance and safety management of the power equipment. In the embodiment of the present application, the responsible person information can be understood as the specific user department of the power equipment, as well as the name, position and other information of the operator, maintainer and servicing personnel of the equipment.

[0061] The assessment report refers to a written assessment report material formed according to the project safety assessment results. In the embodiments of the present application, the assessment report can be understood as an assessment report file generated after inspecting and assessing various safety hazards and risks of the project.

[0062] Specifically, in order to make the rectification more accurate and effective, it is necessary to establish a correspondence between problems, equipment, and personnel. First, based on the identified safety issues to be rectified, determine the specific power equipment involved or affected, such as the correspondence between unqualified personnel and high-voltage switchgear. Then, according to the enterprise asset management system, find out the information of the user departments and operation and maintenance personnel of these power equipment. Finally, in the safety assessment report, for each problem to be rectified, indicate the name of the corresponding power equipment and the name, position, and other information of the department and personnel responsible for the equipment. In this way, the assessment report can intuitively reflect each safety issue and the specific responsible party, making subsequent rectification more targeted and responsible, and also promoting the implementation of the full-staff, full-process safety production responsibility system in enterprises. Through this problem-oriented, equipment-corresponding, and personnel-accurate safety assessment method, the efficiency of rectification and assessment of power system projects can be improved.

[0063] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional embodiment, in step 104: combining the safety issues to be rectified and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment to generate an assessment report of the high-frequency violation items, this step may also include the following steps: Step 401: construct an association matrix between the safety issues to be rectified and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment; based on the association matrix, determine the risk weight of the safety issues to be rectified.

[0064] The association matrix refers to a two-dimensional table that represents the associations between multiple elements in a matrix form according to the correspondence between rows and columns. In the embodiment of the present application, the association matrix can be understood as arranging the correspondence between the safety issues to be rectified, the power equipment and the information of the person in charge in a matrix form, where the rows and columns represent the issues and the equipment / personnel respectively, and the matrix units represent the degree of association.

[0065] Risk weight refers to the weight obtained after quantitative analysis of each safety hazard or risk. In the embodiment of the present application, risk weight can be understood as constructing a correlation matrix between the problem to be rectified and the equipment and personnel, and giving weights corresponding to different degrees of correlation in the matrix, and finally calculating the risk weight value of each problem.

[0066] Specifically, in order to quantitatively analyze the risk level of each safety hazard, it is necessary to establish an association matrix between the problem and the equipment and personnel. First, based on the problems to be rectified listed in the safety assessment report and their corresponding power equipment and responsible person information, an association matrix is ​​constructed. The rows and columns of the matrix represent the problems and equipment / personnel respectively, and the cross cells represent the corresponding relationship between the two. Then, different weights are assigned to the matrix cells according to the degree of relevance between the problem and the personnel and equipment. Finally, the sum of the weights of each row is calculated to obtain the risk weight of each problem. By constructing an association matrix to analyze the risk weight, the degree of impact of the problem on the equipment and personnel can be intuitively reflected, and the severity of each problem can also be quantitatively judged in order to determine the rectification priority. This matrix model analysis method makes the rectification strategy more accurate.

[0067] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional embodiment, in step 401: constructing an association matrix of the information of the person in charge corresponding to the safety issues to be rectified and the power equipment, this step may also include the following steps: Step 411: construct a two-dimensional matrix with the safety issues to be rectified as rows and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment as columns, and use the two-dimensional matrix as a correlation matrix.

[0068] Specifically, in order to establish the corresponding relationship between problems and equipment and personnel, it is necessary to construct an association matrix. First, the rows of the matrix are taken according to the evaluated safety problems to be rectified, and then the user departments and persons in charge of the power equipment corresponding to each problem are taken as columns. In this way, a two-dimensional matrix table is constructed that associates problems with equipment and personnel. Through this matrix form, the relationship between each safety problem and the corresponding equipment user department and person in charge can be clearly reflected, and a data foundation is established for the subsequent risk weight calculation of the problem. The quantitative analysis method of the matrix is ​​used to quantify the complex quality and safety assessment process.

[0069] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional embodiment, in step 401: based on the association matrix, the risk weight of the safety problem to be rectified is determined. This step may also include the following steps: Step 421: Based on the preset risk level mapping table, determine the risk level corresponding to the security issue to be rectified, and determine the number of persons responsible for the security issue to be rectified in the association matrix.

[0070] Among them, the preset risk level mapping table refers to a table of corresponding relationships between different risk levels and problems that is preset before risk assessment, based on the attributes and degree of harm of various risks. In the embodiment of the present application, the preset risk level mapping table can be understood as a table that maps various power system safety issues to risk levels with reference to industry standards, such as mapping equipment defect problems to larger risk levels.

[0071] Specifically, in order to assess the risk weight of each problem, it is necessary to clarify the risk level of the problem and the number of people involved. First, according to the risk level mapping table preset by the enterprise, match the corresponding risk level of each problem to be rectified, such as general or serious risk. Then, count the number of persons in charge involved in each problem row in the established problem-personnel association matrix. By determining the risk level and number of people involved in the safety problem to be rectified, a data foundation is laid for the subsequent use of the matrix to calculate the risk weight.

[0072] Step 431: According to the risk level and the number of responsible persons, the corresponding weight coefficient is matched in the preset risk weight mapping table as the risk weight of the safety issue to be rectified.

[0073] The preset risk weight mapping table refers to a correspondence table of weight coefficients pre-set according to different combinations of risk levels and the number of people involved before risk assessment. In the embodiment of the present application, the preset risk weight mapping table can be understood as a table that maps different risk levels and the number of people involved to weight coefficients in advance.

[0074] Specifically, in order to quantitatively calculate the risk weight for each problem, it is necessary to match the weight coefficients using matrix mapping. First, clarify the risk level and number of people involved for each problem. Then, in the risk weight mapping table preset by the enterprise, find the corresponding weight coefficient according to the risk level and number of people involved in the problem. For example, if a problem is at a serious risk level and involves 5 people, its weight coefficient is 0.8. Calculating the weight coefficients of each problem by table matching makes the process simpler and faster, and also makes the results more objective and accurate, free from subjective influences. The weights are calculated by using matrix pre-set mapping, which realizes the quantification and standardization of risk assessment.

[0075] Step 402: Calculate the risk index of the safety issue to be rectified by combining the risk weight and the baseline risk value of the safety issue to be rectified.

[0076] The baseline risk value refers to the risk value preliminarily determined based on the probability of occurrence and degree of harm of various types of safety risks after prejudging them. In the embodiments of the present application, the baseline risk value can be understood as the risk value of each safety issue to be rectified given in advance according to the enterprise risk classification standard before risk assessment.

[0077] The risk index is the final risk score obtained after quantitative calculation of each safety risk. In the embodiment of the present application, the risk index can be understood as the calculation result obtained by multiplying the risk weight of each problem to be rectified and the benchmark risk value.

[0078] Specifically, in order to more accurately assess the risk level of a problem, both the impact of the problem and the danger of the problem itself are considered. First, by constructing a correlation matrix, the risk weight of each problem to be rectified is calculated to indicate its impact on related equipment and personnel. At the same time, according to the enterprise risk rating standard, a baseline risk value is given for each problem to indicate the danger of the problem itself. Then, in the risk assessment matrix, the risk weight of each problem is multiplied by its baseline risk value to obtain a risk index. In this way, the risk index reflects both the impact of the problem and its own risk, making the assessment more comprehensive and accurate.

[0079] Step 403: Obtain location information corresponding to the safety problem to be rectified, generate a safety problem distribution map of high-frequency violation projects based on the location information and the risk index, and use the safety problem distribution map as an evaluation report for high-frequency violation projects.

[0080] The location information refers to the geographic coordinate information of the power facilities or equipment related to the safety issue to be rectified. In the embodiment of the present application, the location information can be understood as the spatial location related information such as the longitude and latitude coordinates of the power equipment corresponding to the safety issue and the map area where it is located.

[0081] The safety problem distribution map is a distribution diagram that visualizes the location information and risk index of each safety problem to be rectified on a map. In the embodiment of the present application, the safety problem distribution map can be understood as marking the location coordinates and risk level of each problem with points of different sizes and colors on the map to form a spatial distribution map of the problem.

[0082] Specifically, in order to reflect the spatial distribution of the problem, it is necessary to draw a risk distribution map of the safety problem. First, query the geographic coordinates of each power equipment associated with the problem to be rectified as location information. Then mark each problem point on the map, and represent its risk index through different sizes and colors. The larger the red point, the higher the risk. Finally, generate a risk distribution map to form a component of the assessment report. Through the problem distribution map, managers can intuitively see the geographical concentration areas of high-risk problems, which is very helpful for formulating regional and graded rectification strategies. At the same time, the map-based presentation also makes the assessment report richer and more vivid. Managers can grasp the distribution status of the problem more clearly. The use of location information and visualization methods can make the safety assessment of the power system more targeted and improve the efficiency of safety assessment.

[0083] Reference Figure 2, is a special rectification and assessment system for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects provided in the embodiment of the present application, the system includes: an information acquisition module, a project identification module, a safety issue determination module, and a safety assessment module, wherein: An information acquisition module is used to obtain historical operation information of multiple engineering projects in the power enterprise to be evaluated; A project identification module is used to identify high-frequency violation projects based on the number of unticketed operations in each historical operation information; The safety problem determination module is used to receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation projects, and conduct safety assessments on the construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data according to the preset safety operation indicators to determine the safety problems to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects; The safety assessment module is used to determine the power equipment associated with the safety issues to be rectified; and to generate an assessment report on high-frequency violation items by combining the information of the person in charge of the safety issues to be rectified and the power equipment.

[0084] Based on the above embodiments, the project identification module is also used to calculate the average number of ticketless operations for each engineering project based on the number of ticketless operations; multiply the average number of ticketless operations by a preset coefficient to obtain a threshold number of ticketless operations; compare the number of ticketless operations for each engineering project with the threshold number of ticketless operations; if the number of ticketless operations for the engineering project is greater than or equal to the threshold number of ticketless operations, the engineering project is determined as a high-frequency violation project.

[0085] Based on the above embodiments, the safety issue determination module is also used to determine the compliance rate of construction personnel qualifications based on the construction personnel qualification data, and to determine the implementation rate of safety protection measures based on the safety protection measures execution data; to determine the equipment maintenance rate based on the equipment maintenance record data, and to determine the equipment failure handling rate based on the equipment failure handling data; and to determine the safety issues to be rectified in high-frequency violation projects by combining preset safety operation indicators, construction personnel qualification compliance rate, safety protection measures implementation rate, equipment maintenance rate and equipment failure handling rate.

[0086] Based on the above embodiment, the safety issue determination module is also used to compare the construction personnel qualification compliance rate and the safety protection measures implementation rate as indicator items with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the construction safety indicators to obtain the construction safety assessment results; compare the equipment maintenance rate and the equipment fault handling rate as indicator items with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators to obtain the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment results; determine the indicator items in the construction safety assessment results and the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment results that do not meet the preset safety operation indicators, and use the safety issues corresponding to the indicator items as safety issues to be rectified.

[0087] On the basis of the above-mentioned embodiments, the safety assessment module is also used to construct an association matrix between the safety issues to be rectified and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment; based on the association matrix, the risk weights of the safety issues to be rectified are determined; the risk index of the safety issues to be rectified is calculated by combining the risk weights and the baseline risk values ​​of the safety issues to be rectified; the location information corresponding to the safety issues to be rectified is obtained, and based on the location information and the risk index, a safety problem distribution map of high-frequency violation projects is generated, and the safety problem distribution map is used as an assessment report for high-frequency violation projects.

[0088] Based on the above embodiment, the safety assessment module is also used to construct a two-dimensional matrix with the safety issues to be rectified as rows and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment as columns, and use the two-dimensional matrix as a correlation matrix.

[0089] Based on the above embodiment, the security assessment module is also used to determine the risk level corresponding to the security issue to be rectified based on a preset risk level mapping table, and determine the number of responsible persons associated with the security issue to be rectified in the association matrix; according to the risk level and the number of responsible persons, the corresponding weight coefficient is matched in the preset risk weight mapping table as the risk weight of the security issue to be rectified.

[0090] It should be noted that: when the device provided in the above embodiment realizes its function, only the division of the above functional modules is used as an example. In actual application, the above functions can be assigned to different functional modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device is divided into different functional modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. In addition, the device and method embodiments provided in the above embodiment belong to the same concept, and the specific implementation process is detailed in the method embodiment, which will not be repeated here.

[0091] The present application also discloses an electronic device. Figure 3 , Figure 3 The electronic device 300 may include: at least one processor 301 , at least one network interface 304 , a user interface 303 , a memory 305 , and at least one communication bus 302 .

[0092] The communication bus 302 is used to realize the connection and communication between these components.

[0093] The user interface 303 may include a display interface and a camera interface. Optionally, the user interface 303 may also include a standard wired interface and a wireless interface.

[0094] The network interface 304 may optionally include a standard wired interface or a wireless interface (such as a WI-FI interface).

[0095] Among them, the processor 301 may include one or more processing cores. The processor 301 uses various interfaces and lines to connect various parts in the entire server, and executes various functions of the server and processes data by running or executing instructions, programs, code sets or instruction sets stored in the memory 305, and calling data stored in the memory 305. Optionally, the processor 301 can be implemented in at least one hardware form of digital signal processing (Digital Signal Processing, DSP), field programmable gate array (Field-Programmable Gate Array, FPGA), and programmable logic array (Programmable Logic Array, PLA). The processor 301 can integrate one or a combination of a central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU), a graphics processing unit (Graphics Processing Unit, GPU) and a modem. Among them, the CPU mainly processes the operating system, user interface diagrams and applications, etc.; the GPU is responsible for rendering and drawing the content to be displayed on the display screen; the modem is used to process wireless communications. It can be understood that the above-mentioned modem may not be integrated into the processor 301, and it can be implemented separately through a chip.

[0096] Among them, the memory 305 may include a random access memory (Random Access Memory, RAM) and may also include a read-only memory (Read-Only Memory). Optionally, the memory 305 includes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium. The memory 305 can be used to store instructions, programs, codes, code sets or instruction sets. The memory 305 may include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area may store instructions for implementing an operating system, instructions for at least one function (such as a touch function, a sound playback function, an image playback function, etc.), instructions for implementing the above-mentioned various method embodiments, etc.; the data storage area may store data involved in the above-mentioned various method embodiments, etc. The memory 305 may optionally also be at least one storage device located away from the aforementioned processor 301. Refer to Figure 3 , the memory 305 as a computer storage medium may include an operating system, a network communication module, a user interface module and an application program of a special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects.

[0097] exist Figure 3In the electronic device 300 shown, the user interface 303 is mainly used to provide an input interface for the user and obtain the data input by the user; and the processor 301 can be used to call the application program stored in the memory 305 for a special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects. When executed by one or more processors 301, the electronic device 300 executes one or more methods in the above-mentioned embodiments. It should be noted that for the aforementioned method embodiments, for the sake of simple description, they are all expressed as a series of action combinations, but those skilled in the art should know that the present application is not limited by the described order of actions, because according to the present application, certain steps can be performed in other orders or simultaneously. Secondly, those skilled in the art should also know that the embodiments described in the specification are all preferred embodiments, and the actions and modules involved are not necessarily required for the present application.

[0098] In the above embodiments, the description of each embodiment has its own emphasis. For parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0099] In the several embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed devices can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are only schematic, such as the division of units, which is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some service interfaces, and the indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units can be electrical or other forms.

[0100] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0101] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units.

[0102] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable memory. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present application, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a memory and includes several instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the various embodiments of the present application. The aforementioned memory includes: various media that can store program codes, such as USB flash drives, mobile hard drives, magnetic disks or optical disks.

[0103] The above are only exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure and cannot be used to limit the scope of the present disclosure. That is, any equivalent changes and modifications made according to the teachings of the present disclosure are still within the scope of the present disclosure. After considering the disclosure of the specification and the truth of practice, those skilled in the art will easily think of other embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0104] This application is intended to cover any variation, use or adaptation of the present disclosure, which follows the general principles of the present disclosure and includes common knowledge or customary technical means in the art not recorded in the present disclosure. The description and examples are to be regarded as exemplary only.

Claims

1. A special rectification and assessment method for safety issues in power enterprise engineering projects, characterized in that: include: Obtain historical operation information of multiple engineering projects in the power company to be evaluated; Based on the number of operations without tickets in each of the historical operation information, determine the high-frequency violation items; Receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation project, and perform safety assessment on the construction data and the equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to determine the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation project; Determine the power equipment associated with the safety issue to be rectified; Generate an assessment report on the high-frequency violation items by combining the safety issues to be rectified and the person-in-charge information of the power equipment; Determining high-frequency violation items based on the number of ticketless operations in each of the historical operation information includes: Based on the number of unticketed operations, calculate the average number of unticketed operations for each of the engineering projects; Multiply the average number of ticketless operations by a preset coefficient to obtain a threshold number of ticketless operations; Compare the number of operations without a ticket for each of the engineering projects with the threshold number of operations without a ticket; If the number of unticketed operations of the engineering project is greater than or equal to the threshold number of unticketed operations, the engineering project is determined as a high-frequency violation project; The step of generating an assessment report of the high-frequency violation items by combining the safety issues to be rectified and the person-in-charge information corresponding to the power equipment includes: Constructing a correlation matrix between the safety issues to be rectified and the person-in-charge information corresponding to the power equipment; Determining the risk weight of the safety issue to be rectified based on the association matrix; Calculate the risk index of the safety issue to be rectified by combining the risk weight and the baseline risk value of the safety issue to be rectified; The location information corresponding to the safety problem to be rectified is obtained, and based on the location information and the risk index, a safety problem distribution map of the high-frequency violation project is generated, and the safety problem distribution map is used as an evaluation report of the high-frequency violation project.

2. The special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The construction data includes construction personnel qualification data and protection measures execution data, the equipment operation and maintenance data includes equipment maintenance record data and equipment fault handling data, and the safety assessment of the construction data and the equipment operation and maintenance data is performed according to the preset safety operation indicators to determine the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects, including: Determine the construction personnel qualification compliance rate based on the construction personnel qualification data, and determine the safety protection measures implementation rate based on the safety protection measures execution data; Determining an equipment maintenance rate based on the equipment maintenance record data, and determining an equipment failure processing rate based on the equipment failure processing data; In combination with the preset safe operation indicators, the construction personnel qualification compliance rate, the safety protection measures implementation rate, the equipment maintenance rate and the equipment failure handling rate, the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects are determined.

3. The special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The preset safety operation indicators include construction safety indicators and equipment operation and maintenance safety indicators. The combination of the preset safety operation indicators, the construction personnel qualification compliance rate, the safety protection measures implementation rate, the equipment maintenance rate and the equipment failure handling rate to determine the safety issues to be rectified in the high-frequency violation projects includes: Compare the construction personnel qualification compliance rate and the safety protection measures implementation rate as indicator items with the corresponding indicator thresholds in the construction safety indicators to obtain a construction safety assessment result; The equipment maintenance rate and the equipment failure handling rate are respectively used as indicator items and compared with corresponding indicator thresholds in the equipment operation and maintenance safety indicator to obtain an equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment result; Determine the index items in the construction safety assessment results and the equipment operation and maintenance safety assessment results that do not meet the preset safety operation indicators, and use the safety issues corresponding to the index items as the safety issues to be rectified.

4. The special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The step of constructing a correlation matrix between the safety issues to be rectified and the person-in-charge information corresponding to the electric power equipment includes: A two-dimensional matrix is ​​constructed with the safety issues to be rectified as rows and the information of the person in charge corresponding to the power equipment as columns, and the two-dimensional matrix is ​​used as the association matrix.

5. The special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects according to claim 1 is characterized in that: Determining the risk weight of the safety issue to be rectified based on the association matrix includes: Based on a preset risk level mapping table, determine the risk level corresponding to the safety issue to be rectified, and determine the number of persons responsible for the safety issue to be rectified in the association matrix; According to the risk level and the number of persons in charge, a corresponding weight coefficient is matched in a preset risk weight mapping table as the risk weight of the safety issue to be rectified.

6. A special rectification and evaluation system for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects, characterized in that: The system comprises: An information acquisition module is used to obtain historical operation information of multiple engineering projects in the power enterprise to be evaluated; A project identification module, used to determine high-frequency violation projects based on the number of unticketed operations in each of the historical operation information; A safety problem determination module is used to receive the current construction data and equipment operation and maintenance data of the high-frequency violation project, and perform safety assessment on the construction data and the equipment operation and maintenance data according to preset safety operation indicators to determine the safety problems to be rectified in the high-frequency violation project; A safety assessment module, used to determine the power equipment associated with the safety issues to be rectified; generate an assessment report of the high-frequency violation items by combining the safety issues to be rectified and the person-in-charge information corresponding to the power equipment; Determining high-frequency violation items based on the number of ticketless operations in each of the historical operation information includes: Based on the number of unticketed operations, calculate the average number of unticketed operations for each of the engineering projects; Multiply the average number of ticketless operations by a preset coefficient to obtain a threshold number of ticketless operations; Compare the number of operations without a ticket for each of the engineering projects with the threshold number of operations without a ticket; If the number of unticketed operations of the engineering project is greater than or equal to the threshold number of unticketed operations, the engineering project is determined as a high-frequency violation project; The step of generating an assessment report of the high-frequency violation items by combining the safety issues to be rectified and the person-in-charge information corresponding to the power equipment includes: Constructing a correlation matrix between the safety issues to be rectified and the person-in-charge information corresponding to the power equipment; Determining the risk weight of the safety issue to be rectified based on the association matrix; Calculate the risk index of the safety issue to be rectified by combining the risk weight and the baseline risk value of the safety issue to be rectified; The location information corresponding to the safety problem to be rectified is obtained, and based on the location information and the risk index, a safety problem distribution map of the high-frequency violation project is generated, and the safety problem distribution map is used as an evaluation report of the high-frequency violation project.

7. An electronic device, characterized in that: It includes a processor, a memory, a user interface and a network interface, the memory is used to store instructions, the user interface and the network interface are used to communicate with other devices, and the processor is used to execute the instructions stored in the memory so that the electronic device executes the special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects as described in any one of claims 1-5.

8. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores instructions, and when the instructions are executed, the special rectification and assessment method for safety issues of power enterprise engineering projects as described in any one of claims 1-5 is executed.

Images