Water area coordination configuration method giving consideration to shipping development and river environment protection

Abstract

The invention discloses a water area coordination configuration method giving consideration to shipping development and river environment protection, particularly relates to the field of water area coordination, and aims to solve the problem that the existing shipping area planning only plans a shipping route according to one-time evaluation of the environmental suitability of each area in a river reach. And the original river environment cannot be fully utilized and developed. Comprising the following steps: building block monitoring water areas, and collecting ecological index information in each water area; performing ecological suitability evaluation on each monitored water area according to the collected ecological index information; adjusting a shipping route area according to the monthly ecological suitability evaluation of each monitored water area; obtaining the monthly ecological suitability value of the water area of the shipping route, comparing the monthly ecological suitability value with the monthly ecological suitability value before navigation, and determining the influence of shipping on the monitored water area; the situation that in existing shipping route planning, an ecological area is possibly occupied in some time periods or a low-suitability water area is not fully utilized in some time periods is avoided.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of water area coordination, and more specifically, to a water area coordination configuration method that takes into account both shipping development and river environmental protection. Background Art

[0002] The existing coordinated planning of river environmental protection and shipping development usually starts with judging the ecological environment status on both sides of the river, planning for ships to go as far as possible in low-suitability waters, and using high-suitability waters for river ecological protection, thereby performing the role of coordinated planning.

[0003] For example, the Chinese patent with publication number CN114580197A discloses a method for coordinating the configuration of water areas to optimize river environmental protection and take into account shipping development. The comprehensive environmental suitability score is obtained by assigning points to the indicators of each area in the target river section, obtaining the suitability distribution of each area in the target river section, and determining the ecological optimal route centerline. However, due to the different environmental suitability of each area in the river section, the water quality ecology is also different at different times of the year. For example, in summer, the temperature difference between day and night is small, the water body has poor convection exchange, and the drought is severe, resulting in poor water quality environment. In spring and autumn, due to the rapid fluctuation of water temperature, large temperature difference between day and night, and large convection exchange, the water quality is often better than in summer. At this time, if the shipping route is planned based on a simple evaluation of the environmental suitability of each area in the river section, it is easy to cause the original river environment to fail to be fully utilized and developed.

[0004] In view of the above problems, a solution is now proposed. Summary of the invention

[0005] In order to overcome the above-mentioned defects of the prior art, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for coordinated configuration of water areas that takes into account both shipping development and river environmental protection. The shipping routes are dynamically adjusted through ecological information of the river area at different times to solve the problems raised in the above-mentioned background technology.

[0006] To achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:

[0007] A coordinated water area configuration method that takes into account both shipping development and river environmental protection includes the following steps:

[0008] Step S10, establishing a block monitoring water area and collecting ecological indicator information in each water area;

[0009] Step S20, evaluating the ecological suitability of each monitored water area based on the collected ecological indicator information;

[0010] Step S30, adjusting the shipping route area according to the monthly ecological suitability evaluation of each monitored water area;

[0011] Step S40, obtaining the monthly ecological suitability value of the waters along the shipping route, and comparing it with the monthly ecological suitability value before navigation, to determine the impact of shipping on the monitored waters.

[0012] In a preferred embodiment, in step S10, uniformly distributed monitoring points are set in the water area to be tested, denoted as i, i is a positive integer, i=1, 2, 3...k, and each monitoring point forms a block monitoring area; the ecological indicator information includes water depth information, biological information in the water area, and chemical oxygen demand information in the water area;

[0013] The biological information in the water area refers to the dominance information, simplicity information, richness information, diversity information and uniformity information of the animals and plants in the water area; and they are marked as Y, C, F, D, and J respectively.

[0014] In a preferred embodiment, in step S20, the ecological suitability value is set to S, and the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is calculated by the collected water depth information, and the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is compared with the fixed standard interval to determine whether it is within the standard interval, and obtain the water depth evaluation index Ss*. The specific determination method is as follows:

[0015] If the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is within the standard range, the water depth evaluation index Ss* is 0;

[0016] If the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is not within the standard range, the water depth evaluation index Ss* is the absolute value of the deviation value.

[0017] In a preferred embodiment, the collected chemical oxygen demand information is calibrated as Hx, and the ecological suitability value S is calculated regularly for each monitored water area according to the following formula:

[0018]

[0019] Wherein, g1, g2, g3, g4, g5, g6, and g7 are preset proportional coefficients of water depth evaluation index, chemical oxygen demand, dominance information of plants and animals, simplicity information, richness information, diversity information, and uniformity information, respectively, and g1>g2>g5>g6>g7>g3>g4>1.

[0020] In a preferred embodiment, in step S20, the interval between each ecological suitability evaluation of each monitored water area is 1 month, and the monthly ecological suitability value of each monitored water area is compared with the standard threshold value Smin, and the months in which the ecological suitability value of each monitored water area is less than the standard threshold value are marked as the monitored water area to be investigated months.

[0021] In a preferred embodiment, in step S30, when the month in which the ecological suitability value of the monitored water area is less than the standard threshold is obtained, it is determined whether it meets the basic shipping depth standard, and the monitored water area that does not meet the basic shipping depth standard is excluded from the shipping area selection range.

[0022] In a preferred embodiment, in step S30, among the monitored waters that meet the navigation depth standards, the waters whose ecological suitability values ​​are less than the standard threshold throughout the year are designated as common navigation waters, which are selected as conventional waters for navigation; and the months in which the ecological suitability values ​​of other monitored waters are less than the standard threshold are obtained, and according to the location of the monitored waters, the monitored waters are expanded into the shipping route area in the months when the ecological suitability values ​​of the monitored waters are less than the standard threshold.

[0023] In a preferred embodiment, in step S40, an annual ecological suitability evaluation is conducted on waters in the shipping route area where the ecological suitability value is greater than the standard threshold during a specific period of time. A time-ecological suitability value curve is drawn with the collected month as the X-axis and the obtained ecological suitability value as the Y-axis. The time-ecological suitability value curve drawn in the year before shipping is set as the standard curve, and the time-ecological suitability value drawn in the year after navigation is calibrated as the actual curve. The actual time-ecological suitability value curve is superimposed and compared with the standard time-ecological suitability value curve. The comparison is made based on the time axis as the reference for overlap. The ecological suitability value on the actual time-ecological suitability value curve is recorded as SPq, and the ecological suitability value on the standard time-ecological suitability value curve is recorded as SPq * , analyze the difference of the coordinate position deviation values ​​on the two curves, and obtain the deviation characteristic value Q according to the formula. The specific formula is as follows:

[0024]

[0025] Where, SPq is the measured parameter, SPq * is the standard parameter;

[0026] When the deviation characteristic value Q is greater than or equal to the deviation characteristic threshold value Qmax, the monitored waters are marked as depth-affected waters, and the depth-affected waters are removed from the shipping route area;

[0027] When the deviation characteristic value Q is less than the deviation characteristic threshold Qmax, the monitored waters can be navigated normally in months with low ecological suitability.

[0028] In a preferred embodiment, in step S40, before comparing the monthly ecological suitability values ​​before and after navigation, the environmental impact factors of the monitored waters are removed, and the specific method is as follows:

[0029] Obtain the annual average ambient temperature and annual average rainfall of the monitored waters, and calibrate them as T and L respectively. Obtain the environmental impact coefficient W according to the following formula:

[0030] W i =a2L / a1T

[0031] In the formula, a1 and a2 are the preset proportional coefficients of the annual average ambient temperature and the annual average rainfall, and a1>a2>1; through the formula:

[0032]

[0033] Obtain the corrected ecological suitability value E i , when the corrected ecological suitability value E i If it is greater than the correction deviation value, the monitored waters will be marked as depth-affected waters and the depth-affected waters will be removed from the shipping route area.

[0034] The technical effects and advantages of the water area coordination configuration method of the present invention taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection are as follows:

[0035] 1. The present invention dynamically adjusts the shipping route based on the ecological information of the river area at different times, thereby maximizing the development of shipping and the protection of the river environment, and avoiding the situation in which the existing shipping route planning may occupy the ecological area at certain time periods or fail to fully utilize the low suitability waters at certain time periods;

[0036] 2. The present invention can reflect the ecological impact of shipping on water areas by analyzing the changes in the water environment before and after navigation, and mark the water areas with greater impact and remove them from the navigation waters to avoid shipping affecting the ecological protection of the water areas at other times. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0037] Figure 1 The present invention is a flow chart of a method for coordinated configuration of water areas that takes into account both shipping development and river environmental protection. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0038] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0039] Example 1

[0040] The present invention provides a water area coordination configuration method that takes into account both shipping development and river environmental protection. The shipping route is dynamically adjusted through ecological information of the river area at different times, thereby maximizing shipping development and river environmental protection, avoiding the situation in existing shipping route planning where ecological areas are occupied at certain times or water areas with low suitability are not fully utilized at certain times.

[0041] Specifically, Figure 1 As shown, the following steps are included:

[0042] Step S10: Establish block monitoring waters and collect ecological indicator information in each water area.

[0043] Specifically, in the water area to be tested, uniformly distributed monitoring points are set, denoted as i, i is a positive integer, i=1, 2, 3...k, and each monitoring point forms a block monitoring area. The ecological indicator information includes water depth information, biological information in the water area, and chemical oxygen demand information in the water area.

[0044] It should be noted that biological information in the water area refers to the dominance information, simplicity information, richness information, diversity information and uniformity information of animals and plants in the water area, and they are marked as Y, C, F, D and J respectively.

[0045] The dominance information of plants and animals Y is obtained according to the following formula:

[0046]

[0047] Where n j is the abundance of the jth animal or plant in the i-th water area, j is a positive integer, j = 1, 2, 3...m, f j is the frequency of occurrence of the species in each station, and N is the total abundance.

[0048] For the simplicity information C of plants and animals, it is obtained according to the following formula:

[0049]

[0050] The plant and animal richness information F is obtained according to the following formula:

[0051]

[0052] The plant and animal diversity information D is obtained according to the following formula:

[0053]

[0054] The uniformity information of plants and animals J is obtained according to the following formula:

[0055]

[0056] In the formula, m is the number of animal and plant species, D i is the measured diversity, D imax =log2 m.

[0057] The chemical oxygen demand information in the water body refers to the chemical oxygen demand COD in the water body. When the chemical oxygen demand COD exceeds the standard, it means that there are too many pollutants in the water body and the water quality is poor.

[0058] Step S20, evaluating the ecological suitability of each monitored water area based on the collected ecological indicator information.

[0059] Specifically, let the ecological suitability value be S, and calculate the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area through the collected water depth information. Since the water depth area suitable for animals and plants is generally within a fixed standard range, the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is compared with the fixed standard range to see whether it is within the standard range, and the water depth evaluation index Ss* is obtained. Among them, if the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is within the standard range, it means that the monitored water area belongs to an ecology suitable for the survival of animals and plants. At this time, the water depth evaluation index Ss* is 0. If the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is not within the standard range, it means that the monitored water area has a certain deviation from the water depth suitable for the survival of animals and plants. At this time, the water depth evaluation index Ss* is the absolute value of the deviation value.

[0060] The collected chemical oxygen demand information is calibrated as Hx, and the ecological suitability value S is calculated regularly for each monitored water area according to the following formula:

[0061]

[0062] Wherein, g1, g2, g3, g4, g5, g6, and g7 are preset proportional coefficients of water depth evaluation index, chemical oxygen demand, dominance information of plants and animals, simplicity information, richness information, diversity information, and uniformity information, respectively. g1>g2>g5>g6>g7>g3>g4>1, and the larger the ecological suitability value S, the better the ecological suitability of the monitored waters.

[0063] It should be noted that, due to the slow degree of environmental change of water bodies, the present invention monitors each monitored water area once a month, that is, twelve monthly monitorings are carried out throughout the year, and the monthly ecological suitability value of each monitored water area is compared with the standard threshold value Smin to determine whether the ecological suitability value S is greater than the standard threshold value Smin, and the months when the ecological suitability value of each monitored water area is less than the standard threshold value are marked as the monitored water area to be investigated months.

[0064] Step S30, adjusting the shipping route area according to the monthly ecological suitability evaluation of each monitored water area.

[0065] Specifically, in order to facilitate the ecological protection of rivers, as well as river biological information and water depth information suitable for organisms, the ecological protection areas of general rivers are on both sides of the river, rather than the deep water area in the middle. Therefore, when the month when the ecological suitability value of the monitored water area is less than the standard threshold is obtained, it is necessary to judge the depth of the monitored water area to determine whether it meets the basic navigation depth standard, and the monitored water area that does not meet the basic navigation depth standard will be excluded from the navigation area selection range.

[0066] Among the monitored waters that meet the navigation depth standards, the waters whose ecological suitability values ​​are less than the standard threshold throughout the year are designated as common navigation waters, which are selected as regular waters for navigation; and the months when the ecological suitability values ​​of other monitored waters are less than the standard threshold are obtained, and the shipping route area is expanded in specific months according to the location of the monitored waters, so as to better develop navigation.

[0067] Example 2

[0068] The difference between the second embodiment of the present invention and the above embodiment is that the above embodiment mainly introduces the dynamic planning method of the shipping route, which increases or decreases the shipping area by monitoring the ecological suitability values ​​of the water area at different time periods. However, since shipping will cause certain damage to the water body, in this embodiment, part of the water body in the shipping route area will be monitored, so as to further adjust the shipping route area.

[0069] After step S30, the method further includes step S40, which is to obtain the monthly ecological suitability value of the waters along the shipping route and compare it with the monthly ecological suitability value before navigation to determine the impact of shipping on the monitored waters.

[0070] Specifically, no ecological evaluation is conducted for waters in the shipping route area where there is no ecological suitability value greater than the standard threshold value during a specific period. For waters in the shipping route area where there is an ecological suitability value greater than the standard threshold value during a specific period, an ecological suitability evaluation is conducted throughout the year. A time-ecological suitability value curve is drawn with the collected month as the X-axis and the obtained ecological suitability value as the Y-axis. Since the present invention collects data on a monthly basis, the curve is a broken line. The time-ecological suitability value curve drawn in the year before shipping is set as the standard curve, and the time-ecological suitability value drawn in the year after navigation is calibrated as the actual curve. The actual time-ecological suitability value curve is superimposed and compared with the standard time-ecological suitability value curve. The comparison is made using the time axis as the reference for overlap. The ecological suitability value on the actual time-ecological suitability value curve is recorded as SPq, and the ecological suitability value on the standard time-ecological suitability value curve is recorded as SPq * , analyze the difference of the coordinate position deviation values ​​on the two curves, and obtain the deviation characteristic value Q according to the formula. The specific formula is as follows:

[0071]

[0072] Where, SPq is the measured parameter, SPq * are standard parameters.

[0073] When the deviation characteristic value Q is greater than or equal to the deviation characteristic threshold Qmax, it means that the actual time-ecological suitability value curve deviates greatly from the time-ecological suitability value standard curve, that is, the shipping route has a greater impact on the water ecology. At this time, the monitored water area is calibrated as a depth-affected water area, and the depth-affected water area is removed from the shipping route area.

[0074] When the deviation characteristic value Q is less than the deviation characteristic threshold Qmax, it means that the actual time-ecological suitability value curve is basically consistent with the time-ecological suitability value standard curve, that is, shipping has little impact on the ecology of the water area. At this time, the monitored water area can be navigated normally in months with low ecological suitability.

[0075] Example 3

[0076] The difference between Example 3 of the present invention and the above-mentioned embodiments is that in the above-mentioned embodiments, the impact of shipping is judged based on the ecological suitability of the monitored waters before and after shipping. In fact, the environmental information of the river has a greater impact on the ecological environment of the river. If the impact of environmental factors is not considered, it is likely to cause a misjudgment of the impact on shipping.

[0077] Therefore, in step S40, it also includes determining the environmental impact coefficient of the monitored waters, and combining the environmental impact coefficient with the ecological suitability to determine the impact of shipping on the monitored waters.

[0078] Specifically, the annual average ambient temperature and annual average rainfall of the monitored waters are obtained and calibrated as T and L respectively. The environmental impact coefficient W is obtained according to the following formula:

[0079] W i =a2L / a1T

[0080] In the formula, a1 and a2 are the preset proportional coefficients of the annual average ambient temperature and the annual average rainfall, and a1>a2>1. The higher the annual average ambient temperature, the faster the water level drops, and the smaller the environmental impact coefficient. The higher the annual average rainfall, the faster the water level rises, and the larger the environmental impact coefficient. That is, the annual average ambient temperature and annual average rainfall can reflect the water depth of the monitored waters, and temperature and humidity also affect the richness of plants and animals in the waters. Therefore, it is necessary to remove the environmental impact coefficient from the ecological suitability value.

[0081] By formula:

[0082]

[0083] The corrected ecological suitability value E can be obtainedi , and draw a corresponding curve with the detection time, and determine the corrected ecological suitability value E i Whether the change exceeds the correction deviation value can determine the impact of shipping on the monitored waters.

[0084] Specifically, when the corrected ecological suitability value is greater than the corrected deviation value, it means that the shipping route has a greater impact on the water ecology. At this time, the monitored waters are calibrated as depth-affected waters, and the depth-affected waters are removed from the shipping route area; otherwise, it means that shipping has little impact on the ecology of the waters. At this time, the monitored waters can be navigated normally in months with low ecological suitability.

[0085] The above formulas are all dimensionless and numerical calculations. The formula is a formula for the most recent real situation obtained by collecting a large amount of data and performing software simulation. The preset parameters in the formula are set by technicians in this field according to actual conditions.

[0086] The above embodiments can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, firmware or any other combination. When implemented by software, the above embodiments can be implemented in whole or in part in the form of a computer program product. The computer program product includes one or more computer instructions or computer programs. When the computer instructions or computer programs are loaded or executed on a computer, the process or function described in the embodiment of the present application is generated in whole or in part. The computer can be a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a computer network, or other programmable device. The computer instructions can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, or transmitted from one computer-readable storage medium to another computer-readable storage medium. For example, the computer instructions can be transmitted from one website site, computer, server or data center to another website site, computer, server or data center by wired (e.g., infrared, wireless, microwave, etc.). The computer-readable storage medium can be any available medium that a computer can access or a data storage device such as a server or data center that contains one or more available media sets. The available medium can be a magnetic medium (e.g., a floppy disk, a hard disk, a tape), an optical medium (e.g., a DVD), or a semiconductor medium. The semiconductor medium can be a solid-state hard disk.

[0087] Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the units and algorithm steps of each example described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Professional and technical personnel can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered to be beyond the scope of this application.

[0088] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the systems, devices and units described above can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0089] In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are only schematic. For example, the division of the units is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some interfaces, indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units, which can be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

[0090] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0091] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit.

[0092] If the functions are implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as independent products, they can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present application can be essentially or partly embodied in the form of a software product that contributes to the prior art. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of the present application. The aforementioned storage media include: various media that can store program codes, such as USB flash drives, mobile hard disks, read-only memories (ROM), random access memories (RAM), magnetic disks or optical disks.

[0093] The above is only a specific implementation of the present application, but the protection scope of the present application is not limited thereto. Any person skilled in the art who is familiar with the present technical field can easily think of changes or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed in the present application, which should be included in the protection scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application should be based on the protection scope of the claims.

[0094] Finally: The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection, characterized in that: The steps include: Step S10, establishing a block monitoring water area and collecting ecological indicator information in each water area; Step S20, evaluating the ecological suitability of each monitored water area based on the collected ecological indicator information; Step S30, adjusting the shipping route area according to the monthly ecological suitability evaluation of each monitored water area; Step S40, obtaining the monthly ecological suitability value of the waters along the shipping route, and comparing it with the monthly ecological suitability value before navigation, to determine the impact of shipping on the monitored waters.

2. The method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection according to claim 1 is characterized by: In step S10, uniformly distributed monitoring points are set in the water area to be tested, denoted as i, i is a positive integer, i=1, 2, 3...k, and each monitoring point forms a block monitoring area; the ecological indicator information includes water depth information, biological information in the water area, and chemical oxygen demand information in the water area; The biological information in the water area refers to the dominance information, simplicity information, richness information, diversity information and uniformity information of the animals and plants in the water area; and they are marked as Y, C, F, D, and J respectively.

3. The method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection according to claim 1 is characterized by: In step S20, the ecological suitability value is set to S, and the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is calculated through the collected water depth information. The average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is compared with the fixed standard interval to determine whether it is within the standard interval, and the water depth evaluation index Ss* is obtained. The specific determination method is as follows: If the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is within the standard range, the water depth evaluation index Ss* is 0; If the average water depth Ss of each monitored water area is not within the standard range, the water depth evaluation index Ss* is the absolute value of the deviation value.

4. The method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection according to claim 3 is characterized by: The collected chemical oxygen demand information is calibrated as Hx, and the ecological suitability value S is calculated regularly for each monitored water area according to the following formula: Wherein, g1, g2, g3, g4, g5, g6, and g7 are preset proportional coefficients of water depth evaluation index, chemical oxygen demand, dominance information of plants and animals, simplicity information, richness information, diversity information, and uniformity information, respectively, and g1>g2>g5>g6>g7>g3>g4>1.

5. The method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection according to claim 1 is characterized by: In step S20, the interval between each ecological suitability evaluation of each monitored water area is 1 month, and the monthly ecological suitability value of each monitored water area is compared with the standard threshold value Smin, and the months when the ecological suitability value of each monitored water area is less than the standard threshold value are marked as the monitored water area to be investigated.

6. The method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection according to claim 1 is characterized by: In step S30, when the month in which the ecological suitability value of the monitored water area is less than the standard threshold is obtained, it is determined whether it meets the basic navigation depth standard, and the monitored water area that does not meet the basic navigation depth standard is removed from the navigation area selection range.

7. The method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection according to claim 1 is characterized by: In step S30, among the monitored waters that meet the navigation depth standards, the waters that are less than the standard threshold throughout the year are designated as commonly used navigation waters, which are selected as conventional waters for navigation; and the months when the ecological suitability values ​​of other monitored waters are less than the standard threshold are obtained, and according to the location of the monitored waters, the monitored waters are expanded into the shipping route area in the months when the ecological suitability values ​​of the monitored waters are less than the standard threshold.

8. The method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection according to claim 1 is characterized by: In step S40, an annual ecological suitability evaluation is conducted on waters in the shipping route area where the ecological suitability value of a specific period is greater than the standard threshold. A time-ecological suitability value curve is drawn with the collected month as the X-axis and the obtained ecological suitability value as the Y-axis. The time-ecological suitability value curve drawn in the year before shipping is set as the standard curve, and the time-ecological suitability value drawn in the year after navigation is calibrated as the actual curve. The actual time-ecological suitability value curve is superimposed and compared with the standard time-ecological suitability value curve. The comparison is made based on the time axis as the reference for overlap. The ecological suitability value on the actual time-ecological suitability value curve is recorded as SPq, and the ecological suitability value on the standard time-ecological suitability value curve is recorded as SPq * , analyze the difference of the coordinate position deviation values ​​on the two curves, and obtain the deviation characteristic value Q according to the formula. The specific formula is as follows: Where, SPq is the measured parameter, SPq * is the standard parameter; When the deviation characteristic value Q is greater than or equal to the deviation characteristic threshold value Qmax, the monitored waters are marked as depth-affected waters, and the depth-affected waters are removed from the shipping route area; When the deviation characteristic value Q is less than the deviation characteristic threshold Qmax, the monitored waters can be navigated normally in months with low ecological suitability.

9. The method for coordinated configuration of water areas taking into account both shipping development and river environmental protection according to claim 8 is characterized by: In step S40, before comparing the monthly ecological suitability values ​​before and after navigation, the environmental impact factors of the monitored waters are removed. The specific method is as follows: Obtain the annual average ambient temperature and annual average rainfall of the monitored waters, and calibrate them as T and L respectively. Obtain the environmental impact coefficient W according to the following formula: <h2 style=";text-align:left;direction:ltr">W<h2 style=";text-align:left;direction:ltr"> i <h2 style=";text-align:left;direction:ltr"> =a2L / a1T In the formula, a1 and a2 are the preset proportional coefficients of the annual average ambient temperature and the annual average rainfall, and a1>a2>1; through the formula: Obtain the corrected ecological suitability value E i , when the corrected ecological suitability value E i If it is greater than the correction deviation value, the monitored waters will be marked as depth-affected waters and the depth-affected waters will be removed from the shipping route area.

Images