Dock Facility Health Monitoring Method and System Based on Digital Twin and Machine Learning
By establishing a sensor network topology diagram and digital twin model in the health monitoring system of the dock facility, identifying the abnormal state transmission path and diffusion trend, the problem of single-point monitoring false alarms is solved, efficient and accurate early warning and intelligent monitoring are achieved, and the health monitoring capabilities of dock facilities are improved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202510630193.7
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2025-05-16
- Publication Date
- 2025-08-01
- Estimated Expiration
- 2045-05-16
AI Technical Summary
The existing health monitoring system of dock facilities is prone to false alarms due to single-point data fluctuations, which reduces the credibility and accuracy of the early warning system. Moreover, traditional monitoring methods fail to effectively identify the transmission path and diffusion trend of abnormal states.
By establishing a network topology diagram and weight coefficient based on multi-type sensor data, combining historical data to construct abnormal state propagation rules, identify the transmission path of abnormal states, and constructing a multi-dimensional feature layer to evaluate the importance level of the monitoring area in the digital twin model, intelligent monitoring and early warning are achieved.
It improves the accuracy and reliability of early warning, optimizes the allocation of monitoring resources, improves monitoring efficiency and economy, achieves effective coverage of key areas, and improves maintenance efficiency and reduces maintenance costs through fault correlation analysis.
Smart Images

Figure CN120145239B_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present application relates to the field of health monitoring of wharf facilities, and particularly to a method and system for health monitoring of wharf facilities based on digital twin and machine learning. Background Art
[0002] With the rapid development of port economy, the scale and complexity of wharf facilities are constantly increasing, and their safe operation has an important impact on port logistics and trade activities. During the long-term operation process, wharf facilities will face the combined effects of various adverse factors such as marine environment corrosion, periodic loads and emergencies, which are prone to structural damage and performance degradation. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a perfect health monitoring system to ensure the safe operation of wharf facilities.
[0003] In the related art, health monitoring of wharf facilities mainly uses a distributed sensor network to collect real-time data and perform threshold alarm. Specifically, in the implementation, various types of sensors such as stress-strain sensors, displacement sensors and stability sensors are arranged at key structural parts of wharf facilities to collect structural response data; the collected data is transmitted to the monitoring center, and abnormal detection is performed by setting fixed warning thresholds; when a certain monitoring parameter exceeds the warning threshold, the system issues an alarm signal, and professional personnel analyze and evaluate according to the current monitoring data.
[0004] However, the existing fixed threshold alarm method generally directly triggers an alarm when the data at a single monitoring point exceeds the warning threshold. Since wharf facilities will be affected by various factors such as temperature changes and tidal effects during actual operation, the data fluctuation at a single monitoring point may be caused by temporary disturbances rather than real abnormal states. This single-point alarm mechanism is prone to false alarms, which will not only cause unnecessary production stoppage and maintenance, but also reduce the credibility of the early warning system. Summary of the Invention
[0005] The present application provides a method and system for health monitoring of wharf facilities based on digital twin and machine learning to address the problem of how to improve the accuracy and reliability of abnormal state early warning.
[0006] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for health monitoring of wharf facilities based on digital twin and machine learning, which is applied to a health monitoring system of wharf facilities. The method includes:
[0007] Collecting monitoring data of wharf facilities in real time according to a multi-type sensor network deployed at a plurality of preset monitoring points;
[0008] Classifying the monitoring data within a preset time period according to parameter types to obtain a plurality of monitoring parameter subsets, where the monitoring parameter subsets include a plurality of sensor data of the same type;
[0009] A weight coefficient of the monitoring point network topology map is established based on the synchronization change values of the same type of sensor data corresponding to adjacent monitoring points in each of the monitoring parameter subsets, and the monitoring point network topology map corresponds one-to-one with the monitoring parameter subsets;
[0010] In the digital twin model corresponding to the dock facility, a target path corresponding to a network topology path where adjacent weight coefficients are both greater than a first preset threshold is determined as an abnormal transmission path for the same type of sensor data;
[0011] Based on the historical monitoring data corresponding to each preset abnormal state, the abnormal state propagation rules of each abnormal transmission path in each preset abnormal state are determined;
[0012] When it is detected that the sensor data of any monitoring point exceeds the corresponding second preset threshold range, parameter prediction values of other monitoring points in the corresponding abnormal transmission path are calculated based on the abnormal state propagation rules;
[0013] If it is detected that the difference between the predicted values of a preset proportion of the parameters and the corresponding actual monitoring values exceeds a third preset threshold, a warning message including the abnormal location, the affected range, and the development trend is generated.
[0014] Through the above embodiments, the system can identify the transmission path of the abnormal state and avoid false alarms caused by single-point data fluctuations by establishing a network topology map and weight coefficients based on the synchronization changes of multi-type sensor data. The abnormal state propagation rules established in combination with historical data can predict the diffusion trend of the abnormal state. When an abnormality is detected, by comparing the difference between the predicted value and the actual monitoring value, it is possible to more accurately determine whether it is a real abnormality and give a warning message including the abnormal location, the affected range, and the development trend, improving the accuracy and reliability of the warning.
[0015] In some embodiments, before the step of collecting the monitoring data of the dock facility in real time based on the multi-type sensor network deployed at multiple preset monitoring points, the following steps are further included:
[0016] A multi-dimensional feature layer is constructed in the digital twin model corresponding to the dock facility, and the multi-dimensional feature layer includes a material property layer, a load distribution layer, an environmental corrosion layer, and a construction quality layer;
[0017] The weighted superposition value of the feature data of different feature layers in each monitoring area and the corresponding weight coefficients is calculated to obtain a combined influence coefficient. The digital twin model includes multiple monitoring areas, and the weight coefficients are determined based on preset expert scores;
[0018] The importance level corresponding to each monitoring area is determined according to the combined influence coefficient;
[0019] Determine the target monitoring area with an importance level higher than the preset level threshold as the preset monitoring point.
[0020] Through the above embodiments, the system constructs a multi-dimensional feature layer including material properties, load distribution, environmental corrosion, and construction quality in the digital twin model, calculates the combined influence coefficients of different features, and can evaluate the importance levels of each monitoring area. Based on the importance levels, the layout of the preset monitoring points is determined, ensuring the reasonable allocation of monitoring resources, making the monitoring system more targeted to cover key areas, and improving the monitoring efficiency and economy.
[0021] In some embodiments, after the step of collecting the monitoring data of the wharf facilities in real time according to the multi-type sensor networks deployed at multiple preset monitoring points, the following is further included:
[0022] Construct a multi-level monitoring data visualization layer in the digital twin model, where the visualization layer includes a global monitoring layer and a local monitoring layer. The global monitoring layer displays the comprehensive monitoring indicators of each monitoring area, and the local monitoring layer displays the sensor data of the target area;
[0023] When the change rate of the comprehensive monitoring indicator within the preset time period does not exceed the preset change threshold, dynamically display the change process of the comprehensive monitoring indicator on the global monitoring layer;
[0024] When the change rate of the comprehensive monitoring indicator within the preset time period exceeds the preset change threshold, dynamically display the change process of the sensor data of the target area on the local monitoring layer.
[0025] Through the above embodiments, the system can display the monitoring data at different scales by constructing a multi-level visualization system including a global monitoring layer and a local monitoring layer. When the indicator change rate is within the normal range, the global information is displayed, and when it exceeds the threshold, it automatically switches to the local detail display, realizing the intelligent display of the monitoring information. This hierarchical display mechanism not only ensures the grasp of the overall state but also can timely pay attention to the specific conditions of the abnormal areas, improving the visualization effect and utilization efficiency of the monitoring data.
[0026] In some embodiments, the step of establishing the weight coefficient of the monitoring point network topology diagram according to the synchronous change value of the same type of sensor data corresponding to adjacent monitoring points in each monitoring parameter subset specifically includes:
[0027] Calculate the data change rate of each adjacent monitoring point within the preset time window to obtain the change rate trend, where the data change rate is the change amplitude of the sensor data per unit time;
[0028] Calculate the initial weight coefficient according to the similarity of the change rate trend, where the initial weight coefficient represents the basic synchronization degree of the sensor data of adjacent monitoring points.
[0029] Modify the initial weight coefficient according to the time difference between the mutation points of the sensor data corresponding to adjacent monitoring points within the preset time window to obtain the time series weight coefficient;
[0030] Adjust the time series weight coefficient according to the structural connection relationship between the adjacent monitoring points to obtain the final weight coefficient, and the preset adjustment strategies for the time series weight coefficients corresponding to different structural connection relationships are different.
[0031] Through the above embodiments, the system obtains the initial weight coefficient by calculating the similarity of the data change rate trends of adjacent monitoring points, and performs multiple corrections in combination with the time difference of mutation points and the structural connection relationship, establishing a complete set of weight coefficient calculation methods. This weight calculation method considering multiple influencing factors can more accurately reflect the degree of association between monitoring points, providing a reliable basis for identifying the abnormal transmission path.
[0032] In some embodiments, the step of determining the abnormal state propagation rules of each abnormal transmission path under each preset abnormal state according to the historical monitoring data corresponding to each preset abnormal state specifically includes:
[0033] Adopt a sliding time window to segment the historical monitoring data, extract the abnormal occurrence time series of each monitoring point on the abnormal transmission path in each time window, and establish an abnormal transmission sequence;
[0034] Calculate the abnormal propagation time interval between each monitoring point based on the abnormal transmission sequence, and determine the abnormal diffusion rate according to the statistical distribution characteristics of the abnormal propagation time interval;
[0035] Divide the abnormal transmission path into a fast propagation section and a slow propagation section according to the abnormal diffusion rate, and establish a segmented propagation model based on the sensor data of the fast propagation section and the slow propagation section;
[0036] Interpolate and fit the abnormal data of any monitoring point on the abnormal transmission path according to the segmented propagation model to generate a propagation rule curve of the abnormal state, and the propagation rule curve represents the change relationship of the abnormal state intensity with the propagation distance.
[0037] Through the above embodiments, the system performs time window segmentation analysis on historical data, extracts the abnormal transmission sequence, calculates the propagation time interval, and establishes a segmented propagation model considering the difference in propagation rate. This method can accurately depict the diffusion law of the abnormal state in space and time, facilitating the subsequent prediction of the abnormal development trend.
[0038] In some embodiments, the step of generating a warning message including the abnormal location, the influence range, and the development trend if it is detected that the difference between the predicted values of the parameters and the corresponding actual monitored values exceeds a third preset threshold specifically includes:
[0039] Calculating an abnormal diffusion index based on the difference between the predicted value of the parameter and the actual monitored value, where the abnormal diffusion index is the ratio of the number of monitoring points exceeding the third preset threshold to the total number of monitoring points on the abnormal transmission path;
[0040] Determining the abnormal level according to the relationship between the time change rate of the abnormal diffusion index and the preset diffusion threshold, where the abnormal level includes a fast-diffusion type abnormality and a slow-diffusion type abnormality;
[0041] Dividing the monitoring points with a distance less than a preset distance threshold and the same abnormal level into the same abnormal influence area, and generating a spatial distribution map of the abnormal influence area;
[0042] Generating a hierarchical warning message based on the abnormal level and the spatial distribution map, where the hierarchical warning message includes the abnormal level, the diffusion speed, the boundary coordinates of the influence area, and the maximum abnormal degree within each influence area.
[0043] Through the above embodiments, the system can classify abnormalities into fast-diffusion type and slow-diffusion type by calculating the abnormal diffusion index and combining the time change rate, and divide the influence area according to the spatial distribution characteristics. This hierarchical warning mechanism can not only reflect the severity of the abnormality, but also predict its development trend and influence range, providing a decision-making basis for emergency disposal.
[0044] In some embodiments, after the step of generating a warning message including the abnormal location, the influence range, and the development trend if it is detected that the difference between the predicted values of the parameters and the corresponding actual monitored values exceeds a third preset threshold, the method further includes:
[0045] Counting the failure types, failure locations, and failure frequencies of each component of the terminal facilities within a preset time period, and generating a failure statistics table;
[0046] According to the failure statistics table, combining the same type of failures with a failure frequency exceeding a preset number and adjacent locations into a failure mode;
[0047] Analyzing the occurrence time sequence of each failure in the failure mode, and establishing an association relationship between the failures with a time interval less than a preset duration to form a failure association network;
[0048] Divide the detection priorities for the locations where the fault modes are located according to the correlation degrees of the fault nodes in the fault correlation network, where the correlation degree is the number of faults directly connected to the fault node, and different detection priorities correspond to different manual inspection periods;
[0049] Generate a maintenance schedule based on the detection priorities and the corresponding manual inspection periods.
[0050] Through the above embodiments, the system can establish a fault correlation network by statistically analyzing the fault types, locations, and frequencies, and can identify relevant fault modes. By dividing the detection priorities based on the correlation degrees of the fault nodes and formulating corresponding inspection periods, the scientific formulation of the maintenance plan is realized. This maintenance strategy based on fault correlation analysis can improve the maintenance efficiency and reduce the maintenance cost.
[0051] In a second aspect, the present application provides a wharf facility health monitoring system, where the wharf facility health monitoring system includes: one or more processors and a memory;
[0052] The memory is coupled to the one or more processors, and the memory is used to store computer program code, where the computer program code includes computer instructions, and the one or more processors call the computer instructions so that the wharf facility health monitoring system can implement a wharf facility health monitoring method based on digital twin and machine learning provided by the above embodiments, which will not be elaborated here.
[0053] In a third aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, including instructions, when the instructions run on the wharf facility health monitoring system, enabling the wharf facility health monitoring system to implement a wharf facility health monitoring method based on digital twin and machine learning provided by the above embodiments, which will not be elaborated here.
[0054] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer program product, when the computer program product runs on the wharf facility health monitoring system, enabling the wharf facility health monitoring system to implement a wharf facility health monitoring method based on digital twin and machine learning provided by the above embodiments, which will not be elaborated here.
[0055] One or more technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present application have at least the following technical effects or advantages:
[0056] 1. By analyzing the synchronous changes of multi-type sensor data to establish a network topology diagram and weight coefficients, and combining historical data to construct abnormal state propagation rules, the transformation from single-point monitoring to networked monitoring is realized. This method can not only address the false alarm problems easily generated by traditional single-point threshold alarms, but also accurately identify the transmission paths and diffusion trends of abnormal states, significantly improving the accuracy and reliability of early warnings.
[0057] 2. By constructing a multi-dimensional feature layer including material properties, load distribution, environmental corrosion, and construction quality in the digital twin model, calculating the combined influence coefficient to evaluate the importance level of the monitoring area, and realizing the optimal allocation of monitoring resources. This monitoring strategy based on multi-dimensional feature fusion ensures the effective coverage of the monitoring system for key areas and improves the overall monitoring efficiency.
[0058] 3. By establishing a fault statistics analysis and correlation network model, identifying relevant fault modes, and dividing the detection priorities based on the correlation degree of fault nodes, a data-driven intelligent maintenance system is formed. This method breaks through the limitations of traditional fixed-cycle maintenance, realizes a differential maintenance strategy based on fault correlation relationships, effectively improves the maintenance efficiency and reduces the maintenance cost. Brief Description of the Drawings
[0059] Figure 1 is a schematic flowchart of a method for health monitoring of wharf facilities based on digital twin and machine learning in an embodiment of the present application;
[0060] Figure 2 is another schematic flowchart of a method for health monitoring of wharf facilities based on digital twin and machine learning in an embodiment of the present application;
[0061] Figure 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an entity device of a wharf facility health monitoring system in an embodiment of the present application. Detailed Embodiments
[0062] The terms used in the following embodiments of the present application are only for the purpose of describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the present application. As used in the specification and appended claims of the present application, the singular forms "a", "an", "the", "above-mentioned", "said", and "this" are also intended to include the plural forms unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It should also be understood that the term " / and / " used in the present application refers to any or all possible combinations including one or more of the listed items.
[0063] Hereinafter, the terms "first" and "second" are only used for descriptive purposes and cannot be construed as implying or indicating relative importance or implicitly specifying the quantity of the indicated technical features. Thus, the features defined with "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of such features. In the description of the embodiments of the present application, unless otherwise specified, the meaning of "a plurality" is two or more.
[0064] It should be noted that for ease of understanding, in the embodiments of this application, the wharf facility health monitoring system may also be simply referred to as the "system", and this abbreviation will not affect the protection scope of this application.
[0065] For ease of understanding, the method provided in this embodiment will be described in terms of its process below. Please refer to Figure 1 , which is a schematic flow diagram of a wharf facility health monitoring method based on digital twin and machine learning in the embodiments of this application.
[0066] S101. Real-time collect the monitoring data of the wharf facilities based on the multi-type sensor networks deployed at multiple preset monitoring points.
[0067] Among them, the preset monitoring points refer to the positions that are pre-determined on the wharf facilities (such as wharf structural components, key nodes, etc.) and need to be monitored key points; the multi-type sensor networks refer to the monitoring networks composed of multiple different types of sensors (such as stress-strain sensors, displacement sensors, temperature sensors, corrosion monitoring sensors, etc.), which are used to represent the physical state data of the wharf facilities (such as stress, displacement, temperature, corrosion degree, etc.) collected in real time from multiple dimensions.
[0068] Specifically, the wharf facility health monitoring system obtains the physical parameter data of the wharf facilities in real time through various sensors (such as strain gauges, inclinometers, accelerometers, etc.) pre-deployed at key positions of the wharf structure. These sensors are distributed in different areas (such as wharf pile foundations, beam slabs, berthing members, etc.) according to the monitoring requirements to form a monitoring network covering the entire facility.
[0069] In addition, after obtaining the monitoring data, the system can also construct a multi-level monitoring data visualization layer in the digital twin model. This visualization layer includes a global monitoring layer and a local monitoring layer. The global monitoring layer is used to display the comprehensive monitoring indicators of each monitoring area (such as aggregated values such as average stress and cumulative displacement), and the local monitoring layer is used to display the sensor data of the target area (such as real-time values of stress and displacement at specific points). When the change rate of the comprehensive monitoring indicator within a preset time period (such as 1 hour) does not exceed the preset change threshold (such as 5% / hour), the system dynamically displays the change process of the comprehensive indicator in the global monitoring layer in the form of a heat map, dynamic curve, etc. For example, it reflects the high and low of each area indicator through color gradient, and the curve scrolls to show the historical trend; when the change rate of the comprehensive monitoring indicator exceeds the preset change threshold, the system automatically loads the sensor data of the target area (such as the area where the indicator mutates) in the local monitoring layer, and displays the change process of the sensor data of this area in the way of highlighting the three-dimensional model points, real-time data list, dynamic waveform diagram, etc. For example, it draws the stress mutation curve within the past 30 minutes and marks the threshold range to assist the operation and maintenance personnel in deeply analyzing the abnormal details.
[0070] S102. Classify the monitoring data within a preset time period according to parameter types to obtain multiple subsets of monitoring parameters.
[0071] Specifically, the system screens and classifies all the monitoring data collected within the preset time period according to the type tags of the sensors (such as "stress sensor", "displacement sensor", etc.). For example, the data of all stress and strain sensors are classified into the "stress parameter subset", and the data of displacement sensors are classified into the "displacement parameter subset", and so on. During the classification process, the system automatically identifies the unique identifier of the sensor (such as MAC address, device number) and its corresponding parameter type to ensure accurate data classification. The classified data subsets are stored in different tables in the database for subsequent synchronous analysis and network topology construction according to parameter types.
[0072] S103. Establish the weight coefficients of the monitoring point network topology graph based on the synchronous change values of the data of the same type of sensors corresponding to adjacent monitoring points in each subset of monitoring parameters.
[0073] Specifically, for each subset of monitoring parameters (such as the stress parameter subset), the system traverses all pairs of adjacent monitoring points and calculates the synchronous index of the data of the same type of sensors within a preset time window (such as the past 24 hours). For example, for two adjacent strain monitoring points A and B, calculate the correlation coefficient of their strain data sequences as the initial synchronous value. Then, combine the structural connection relationship between adjacent monitoring points (such as whether they are directly connected by components) and the time difference of data mutation points (such as how long after the data mutation at point A does a similar mutation occur at point B) to correct the initial value and obtain the final weight coefficient. For example, if A and B are connected by the same beam and the time difference of data mutation is less than 5 minutes, the weight coefficient is increased by 20%; if it is a non-directly connected structure, the weight coefficient is decreased by 10%. Finally, each parameter subset corresponds to a weighted network topology graph for subsequent identification of abnormal transmission paths.
[0074] Optionally, the system calculates the sliding window correlation coefficient of the data sequences of adjacent monitoring points (the window size is 1 hour), and takes the average correlation coefficient within the past 24 hours as the initial weight. Detect the mutation points in the data sequence (such as points with a change amplitude exceeding 5%), calculate the time difference of the mutation points of adjacent monitoring points. If the time difference is less than 10 minutes, the weight coefficient is increased by 0.1; if it is greater than 30 minutes, the weight coefficient is decreased by 0.2. Determine the connection type between adjacent monitoring points (such as rigid connection, hinge connection) according to the structural design drawings. The weight coefficient of rigid connection is multiplied by 1.2, and that of hinge connection is multiplied by 0.8, etc., which is not limited here.
[0075] Optionally, the system can also calculate the theoretical strain transfer coefficient between adjacent monitoring points under the action of unit load based on the finite element model of the wharf structure as the initial weight. Compare the difference between the actual monitoring data and the theoretical transfer coefficient. When the difference is less than 5%, the weight coefficient remains unchanged. When the difference is greater than 10%, the weight coefficient is adjusted by ±0.2 (according to the direction of the difference). Finally, considering the influence of environmental factors (such as temperature change) on the structural response, the weight coefficient is corrected through a temperature compensation algorithm. For example, when the temperature changes by 10°C, the weight coefficient is adjusted by 0.05, which is not limited here.
[0076] S104. In the digital twin model corresponding to the wharf facilities, determine the target path corresponding to the network topology path where the adjacent weight coefficients are all greater than the first preset threshold as the abnormal transfer path for sensor data of the same type.
[0077] Among them, the digital twin model refers to a virtual mapping body of wharf facilities constructed through 3D modeling technology, integrating information such as structural geometric parameters, material properties, and sensor layouts, and is used to represent the real-time mirror image and simulation analysis of physical entities; the network topology path refers to a combination of a series of connected edges from the starting point to the ending point in the monitoring point network topology diagram, and is used to represent the transfer path of data or abnormal states between monitoring points; the abnormal transfer path refers to the path in the digital twin model where when an abnormality occurs at a certain monitoring point, the abnormal state may be transferred to other monitoring points through a strongly correlated path, and is used to represent the potential channel for abnormal diffusion.
[0078] Specifically, based on the network topology diagram corresponding to each monitoring parameter subset, the system traverses all possible network topology paths in the digital twin model. For the adjacent edges (i.e., the connections between adjacent monitoring points) on each path, check whether their weight coefficients are all greater than the first preset threshold. For example, if a certain path contains monitoring points A→B→C, where the weight coefficient of A - B is 0.7 and the weight coefficient of B - C is 0.8, both greater than the preset threshold of 0.6, then this path is determined as an abnormal transfer path. For different parameter types (such as stress, displacement), the system can generate corresponding abnormal transfer paths respectively and mark them with different colors or line types in the digital twin model for quick call during subsequent abnormal detection.
[0079] Optionally, for the network topology diagram of each monitoring parameter subset, the system can use the Dijkstra algorithm or the Floyd - Warshall algorithm to calculate the shortest paths between all node pairs (with the weight coefficient as the edge weight). Screen out the paths where the weight coefficients of all edges in the path are greater than the first preset threshold as candidate abnormal transfer paths. Visualize these paths in the digital twin model and sort them according to the path length (number of edges). Since abnormal diffusion is usually faster for short paths, short paths (such as 2 - 3 - hop paths) can be preferentially marked and displayed.
[0080] S105. Determine the abnormal state propagation rules of each abnormal transmission path under each preset abnormal state according to the historical monitoring data corresponding to each preset abnormal state.
[0081] Among them, the preset abnormal state refers to the abnormal types of wharf facilities predefined by the system (such as structural cracks, increased corrosion, displacement exceeding the limit, etc.); the abnormal state propagation rule refers to a mathematical model or curve that describes the diffusion speed, intensity attenuation, and spatial distribution law of the abnormal state on the abnormal transmission path.
[0082] Specifically, for each preset abnormal state (such as structural damage caused by stress exceeding the limit), the system collects its corresponding historical monitoring data (including the time series data of each monitoring point when the abnormality occurs). For each abnormal transmission path, a sliding time window (such as a window size of 2 hours and a step size of 1 hour) is used to segment the historical monitoring data, and the transmission order of the abnormality on the path within each window is extracted (such as the abnormality at monitoring point A appears before B), and an abnormal transmission sequence is established. By calculating the time difference between the occurrences of abnormalities at adjacent monitoring points, the time interval distribution of abnormal propagation is statistically obtained (such as the average time interval is 30 minutes), so as to determine the abnormal diffusion rate of this path (such as propagating 0.5 meters per minute). According to the diffusion rate, the path is divided into a fast propagation section (such as from the pile foundation to the bearing platform) and a slow propagation section (such as from the bearing platform to the beam and slab), and linear or exponential propagation models are established respectively. Finally, an interpolation fitting is used to generate a propagation rule curve. For example, the abnormal intensity of a certain path decays exponentially with the propagation distance, and the formula is:
[0083] , where is the initial abnormal intensity, and k is the attenuation coefficient.
[0084] Optionally, the system can use a recurrent neural network (RNN) to train the time series model of the abnormal transmission path. The input is the abnormal data of the starting monitoring point, and the output is the predicted data of other monitoring points on the path. The model parameters are the propagation rules. The key sections of abnormal propagation are identified through the attention mechanism. For example, in a certain path, the propagation from monitoring point B to C has the greatest impact on the overall trend, and a higher model weight is assigned to it. The propagation process of rare abnormal states can also be simulated using a generative adversarial network (GAN) to supplement the rules for extreme cases missing in the historical data, which is not limited here.
[0085] S106. When it is detected that the sensor data of any monitoring point exceeds the corresponding second preset threshold range, calculate the parameter prediction values of other monitoring points in the corresponding abnormal transmission path based on the abnormal state propagation rules.
[0086] Specifically, when the system detects that the data of a certain monitoring point (such as the stress sensor of pile foundation A) exceeds the second preset threshold (such as 30 MPa), it first determines the abnormal transmission path to which the monitoring point belongs (such as the path of pile foundation A → cap B → beam slab C screened by the weight coefficient). Then, according to the abnormal state propagation rule corresponding to this path (such as the diffusion rate of stress anomaly is 0.5 MPa·m⁻¹·min⁻¹), combined with the current abnormal intensity (such as the stress of pile foundation A is 35 MPa, exceeding the threshold by 5 MPa) and the propagation time (such as 10 minutes have passed), it calculates the parameter prediction values of other monitoring points (cap B, beam slab C) on the path. For example, assuming the distance between pile foundation A and cap B is 2 meters and the diffusion rate is 0.5 MPa·m⁻¹·min⁻¹, the predicted stress of cap B after 10 minutes is 50 Mpa. After the prediction values are calculated, the system compares them with the actual monitoring data in real time to determine whether the anomaly is truly spreading.
[0087] S107. If it is detected that the difference between the predicted values of a preset proportion of parameters and the corresponding actual monitoring values exceeds the third preset threshold, an early warning message including the abnormal location, influence range, and development trend is generated.
[0088] Specifically, the system calculates the differences between the predicted values and the actual monitoring values of all monitoring points on the abnormal transmission path, and counts the proportion of the number of monitoring points whose differences exceed the third preset threshold. For example, if a certain path has a total of 5 monitoring points, and the differences of 3 of them exceed the threshold, accounting for 60% (reaching the preset proportion), it is determined that there is a real abnormal diffusion. Then, according to the abnormal transmission path and the spatial positions of the monitoring points, the abnormal location (such as pile foundation A) and the influence range (such as the area where cap B and beam slab C are located) are determined. By analyzing the time change rate of the abnormal diffusion index (the proportion of monitoring points exceeding the threshold) (such as increasing by 5% per minute), it is judged whether the abnormal level is a fast diffusion type or a slow diffusion type, and the future trend is predicted (such as the influence range will expand to the adjacent path within 30 minutes). Finally, a visual early warning message including the abnormal location coordinates, the boundary of the affected area, the diffusion speed, and the future 2-hour trend prediction is generated and pushed to the terminal devices of the operation and maintenance personnel.
[0089] In the above embodiment, the system can identify the transmission path of the abnormal state and avoid false alarms caused by single-point data fluctuations by establishing a network topology map and weight coefficients based on the synchronous changes of multi-type sensor data. The abnormal state propagation rule established in combination with historical data can predict the diffusion trend of the abnormal state. When an anomaly is detected, by comparing the difference between the predicted value and the actual monitoring value, it can more accurately determine whether it is a real anomaly and give an early warning message including the abnormal location, influence range, and development trend, improving the accuracy and reliability of the early warning.
[0090] The following is a further and more specific process description of the method provided in this embodiment. Please refer toFigure 2 , which is another process schematic diagram of a wharf facility health monitoring method based on digital twin and machine learning in the embodiments of this application.
[0091] S201. Construct a multi-dimensional feature layer in the digital twin model corresponding to the wharf facility.
[0092] This step is executed when the digital twin model is initially constructed during system initialization or after the new construction / transformation of the wharf facility, and can be updated regularly according to the facility maintenance records or environmental changes subsequently.
[0093] Specifically, the system creates four independent feature layers in the digital twin model based on the design drawings, construction records, and environmental monitoring data of the wharf facility. For example, in the material property layer, the compressive strength parameter of C30 concrete and the elastic modulus of steel are assigned to each pile foundation member; in the load distribution layer, the impact force distribution during ship berthing is defined according to the wharf operation log; in the environmental corrosion layer, the salt spray corrosion rate is set in combination with local meteorological data; in the construction quality layer, the ultrasonic inspection report of pile foundation construction is imported, and the areas with honeycombing and pockmarks are marked. Each feature layer is bound to the components in the three-dimensional model one by one through the Geographic Information System (GIS) to form a virtual model with multi-dimensional data integration.
[0094] Among them, the multi-dimensional feature layer refers to the virtual level divided according to different influencing factors in the digital twin model, which is used to represent the set of multi-dimensional physical attributes that affect the health state of the wharf facility, including the material property layer, the load distribution layer, the environmental corrosion layer, and the construction quality layer. The material property layer refers to the level that stores the material property data of each component of the wharf facility, including concrete strength grade, steel yield strength, material aging coefficient, etc., and is used to represent the influence of the performance characteristics of the material itself on the structural health; the load distribution layer refers to the level that records various load data borne by the wharf facility, including self-weight load, ship impact load, cargo stacking load, tidal load, etc., and is used to represent the action effect of external loads on the structure; the environmental corrosion layer refers to the level that characterizes the corrosion effect of the marine environment on the wharf facility, including data such as salt spray concentration, water level change frequency, and microbial erosion degree, and is used to represent the degradation of structural performance caused by environmental factors; the construction quality layer refers to the level that reflects the construction technology and quality during the construction process of the wharf facility, including concrete pouring defects, weld quality grade, foundation treatment depth, etc., and is used to represent the potential influence of construction legacy problems on the structural health.
[0095] S202. Calculate the weighted superposition value of the feature data of different feature layers and the corresponding weight coefficients in each monitoring area to obtain the combined influence coefficient.
[0096] Specifically, the system divides the digital twin model into multiple monitoring areas (for example, the dock is divided into 10 monitoring areas according to structural segments), and extracts the feature data of four feature layers for each monitoring area. For example, the feature data of a certain pile foundation monitoring area includes: the concrete strength of the material property layer is 25 MPa (the design value is 30 MPa, and the strength is reduced due to aging), the peak value of the ship impact force of the load distribution layer is 500 kN, the salt spray corrosion rate of the environmental corrosion layer is 0.01 mm / year, and the pile foundation integrity of the construction quality layer is 90%. According to the preset weight coefficients (material property 0.4, load distribution 0.3, environmental corrosion 0.2, construction quality 0.1), the combined influence coefficient is calculated.
[0097] S203. Determine the importance level corresponding to each monitoring area according to the combined influence coefficient, and determine the target monitoring areas with importance levels higher than the preset level threshold as the preset monitoring points.
[0098] Specifically, the system divides the importance levels according to the numerical range of the combined influence coefficient. For example, it is set that the combined influence coefficient > 200 is level I (high risk), 100 - 200 is level II (medium risk), < 100 is level III (low risk), and the preset level threshold is level II. The combined influence coefficient of a certain monitoring area is 180 (level II), which is higher than the threshold, so it is determined as a preset monitoring point. The system marks these areas in the digital twin model and generates a monitoring point deployment list, including the recommended sensor types (for example, stress, displacement, and corrosion sensors need to be deployed in level I areas, and at least stress sensors need to be deployed in level II areas) and installation locations (such as the top and middle of high-risk pile foundations).
[0099] In the above embodiment, the system can evaluate the importance levels of each monitoring area by constructing multi-dimensional feature layers including material properties, load distribution, environmental corrosion, and construction quality in the digital twin model and calculating the combined influence coefficients of different features. Determining the layout of the preset monitoring points based on the importance levels ensures the reasonable allocation of monitoring resources, enables the monitoring system to more specifically cover key areas, and improves the monitoring efficiency and economy.
[0100] S204. Calculate the initial weight coefficient according to the similarity of the change rate trends of the data change rates of adjacent monitoring points within the preset time window.
[0101] Specifically, for each subset of monitoring parameters (such as the subset of displacement parameters), the system traverses all pairs of adjacent monitoring points (such as monitoring points A and B), and extracts the sequence of minute-level data change rates within a preset time window (such as the most recent 6 hours). For example, the displacement change rate (unit: mm / h) of monitoring point A every 10 minutes is calculated to form a change rate sequence containing 36 data points. Through the dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm or Pearson correlation coefficient, the similarity value of the change rate sequences of adjacent monitoring points (such as the correlation coefficient is 0.8) is calculated and used as the initial weight coefficient. The higher this coefficient, the more consistent the data change trends of adjacent monitoring points and the stronger the basic synchronization.
[0102] S205. Adjust the initial weight coefficient based on the time difference between the mutation points of the corresponding sensor data of adjacent monitoring points within the preset time window and the structural connection relationship between adjacent monitoring points to obtain the final weight coefficient.
[0103] Specifically, the system first detects the mutation points of adjacent monitoring points within the preset time window (such as identifying mutation points by setting the mutation threshold to 3 times the standard deviation of the data), calculates the mutation point time difference Δt. If Δt is less than the preset threshold (such as 10 minutes), it is determined that the abnormal conduction is rapid, and the initial weight coefficient is increased by Δw1 (such as 0.1); if Δt is greater than the threshold, it is determined that the conduction is lagging, and the coefficient is decreased by Δw2 (such as 0.05), where both Δw1 and Δw2 are time-series weight coefficients. Then, adjust the weight according to the structural connection relationship: the coefficient of rigid connection (such as the same continuous beam) is multiplied by the adjustment factor k1 = 1.2, the hinged connection is multiplied by k2 = 0.9, and the non-direct connection (such as indirectly connected through the foundation) is multiplied by k3 = 0.7. The final weight coefficient w is: w = (initial weight coefficient + Δw) × k
[0104] For example, the initial weight is 0.8, the mutation time difference is 5 minutes (+0.1), and it is a rigid connection (×1.2), the final weight w is (0.8 + 0.1) × 1.2 = 1.08 (which can be normalized to 1).
[0105] In the above embodiments, the system obtains the initial weight coefficient by calculating the similarity of the data change rate trends of adjacent monitoring points, and performs multiple corrections in combination with the mutation point time difference and the structural connection relationship, establishing a complete set of weight coefficient calculation methods. This weight calculation method considering multiple influencing factors can more accurately reflect the correlation degree between monitoring points and provide a reliable basis for identifying the abnormal transmission path.
[0106] S206. When determining the monitoring point of the abnormal sensor data and the parameter prediction values of other monitoring points in the corresponding abnormal transmission path, calculate the abnormal diffusion index based on the difference between the parameter prediction value and the actual monitoring value.
[0107] Specifically, the system first determines the abnormal initial monitoring point (such as pile foundation A) and its affiliated abnormal transmission path (such as A→B→C) through step S106. Calculate the parameter prediction values of other monitoring points (B, C) on the path according to the propagation rule (such as the predicted stress at point B is 45 MPa and at point C is 38 MPa). Then, obtain the actual monitoring values of these monitoring points (such as the actual value at point B is 40 MPa and at point C is 35 MPa), and calculate the difference (the difference at point B is 5 MPa and at point C is 3 MPa). If the third preset threshold is 4 MPa, then the difference at point B exceeds the threshold and the difference at point C does not. The abnormal diffusion index is 1 / 2 == 0.5 (there are 2 monitoring points in total on the path and 1 exceeds the threshold).
[0108] S207. Determine the abnormal level according to the relationship between the time change rate of the abnormal diffusion index and the preset diffusion threshold, and divide the monitoring points with a distance less than the preset distance threshold and the same abnormal level into the same abnormal influence area, generating hierarchical warning information including the abnormal level and the spatial distribution map of the abnormal influence area.
[0109] Specifically, the system calculates the time change rate of the abnormal diffusion index. If the time change rate is greater than the preset diffusion threshold (such as 0.05 / minute), it is determined as a rapidly spreading type of abnormality; otherwise, it is a slowly spreading type. Then, based on the spatial coordinates of the monitoring points, the monitoring points with a distance less than the preset distance threshold (such as 10 meters) and the same abnormal level are divided into the same area. For example, for monitoring points B (8 meters away from point A) and C (12 meters away from point A), if B is of the rapidly spreading type and C is of the slowly spreading type, then B is separately divided into the rapidly spreading area and C is included in the slowly spreading area. Finally, a spatial distribution map is generated in the digital twin model, with the rapidly spreading area marked in red, the slowly spreading area marked in yellow, and the boundary coordinates and the maximum degree of abnormality of each area marked (such as the difference at point B is 5 MPa).
[0110] In the above embodiment, the system can classify the abnormality into a rapidly spreading type and a slowly spreading type by calculating the abnormal diffusion index and combining the time change rate, and divide the influence area according to the spatial distribution characteristics. This hierarchical warning mechanism can not only reflect the severity of the abnormality, but also predict its development trend and influence range, providing a decision-making basis for emergency response.
[0111] S208. Statistically analyze the fault types, fault locations, and fault frequencies of each component of the wharf facilities within a preset time period, and combine the same type of faults with adjacent positions and fault frequencies exceeding the preset number into a fault mode.
[0112] Specifically, the system can extract fault data within a preset time period from historical warning records and manual fault reports, classify and count them according to component types (such as pile foundations, beam slabs), fault types (such as corrosion, cracks), and locations (such as the area 10 - 20 meters from the quay front line), and form a fault statistics table.
[0113] The system traverses the records in the fault statistics table. For the same fault type (such as corrosion), it filters out the records with a fault frequency exceeding a preset number of times (such as ≥ 3 times / year). Then, it calculates the spatial distance between the fault locations of these records. If the distance is less than the preset distance threshold (such as 10 meters), these faults are combined into a fault mode. For example, 3 pile foundations (with spacings all less than 8 meters) in a certain area have all had 4 corrosion faults in the past year, meeting the frequency and location conditions. The system combines them into the "pile foundation corrosion cluster fault mode" and records the central location, influence range, and fault type of this mode.
[0114] S209. Analyze the occurrence time sequence of each fault in the fault mode, establish an association relationship between the faults with a time interval less than the preset duration, and form a fault association network.
[0115] Specifically, the system sorts the faults in each fault mode by the occurrence time, calculates the time interval between adjacent faults (such as fault A occurred on January 5, 2024, and fault B occurred on January 15, 2024, with an interval of 10 days). If the time interval is less than the preset duration (such as 30 days), a directed edge is established between these two faults (such as A→B, indicating that A occurred before B). By traversing all fault pairs, a fault association network including time associations is formed. For example, a certain fault mode contains 5 corrosion faults, and the intervals between 3 of them are all less than 20 days, forming a chain association network of A→B→C, indicating a possible trend of corrosion spreading.
[0116] S210. Divide the detection priorities for the locations where the fault modes are located according to the association degrees of the fault nodes in the fault association network, and generate a maintenance schedule in combination with the corresponding manual inspection cycle.
[0117] Specifically, the system calculates the correlation degree of each node in the fault correlation network (i.e., the number of faults directly connected to the fault node in the correlation network), sorts them from high to low according to the correlation degree, and divides them into three levels of detection priorities: high (correlation degree ≥ 3), medium (correlation degree = 2), and low (correlation degree ≤ 1). For example, a node with a correlation degree of 4 is classified as a high priority, and the corresponding manual inspection period is once a week; a node with a correlation degree of 2 is classified as a medium priority, and the period is once a month. The system generates a maintenance schedule based on the priority and period, which includes information such as the fault mode location, detection priority, next inspection time, and responsible engineer, and pushes it to the relevant personnel via email or system message.
[0118] In the above embodiment, the system can identify relevant fault modes by establishing a fault correlation network through statistical analysis of fault types, locations, and frequencies. The detection priorities are divided based on the correlation degree of the fault nodes, and corresponding inspection periods are formulated, realizing the scientific formulation of the maintenance plan. This maintenance strategy based on fault correlation analysis can improve the maintenance efficiency and reduce the maintenance cost.
[0119] The dock facility health monitoring system of the embodiment of the present invention is applied to an electronic device. Figure 3 The schematic diagram of the architecture of the electronic device suitable for implementing the embodiment of the present invention is shown.
[0120] It should be noted that Figure 3 The shown electronic device is only an example and should not bring any limitation to the functions and usage scope of the embodiment of the present invention.
[0121] Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the steps in the various methods of the above embodiments can be completed by instructions (computer programs), or the relevant hardware can be controlled by instructions (computer programs). The instructions can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium and loaded and executed by a processor. The electronic device of this embodiment includes a storage medium and a processor. Among them, multiple instructions are stored in the storage medium, and these instructions can be loaded by the processor to execute any step of the method provided by the embodiment of the present invention.
[0122] Specifically, the storage medium and the processor are electrically connected directly or indirectly to achieve data transmission or interaction. For example, these components can be electrically connected to each other through one or more signal lines. The storage medium stores computer-executable instructions for implementing the data access control method, including at least one software function module that can be stored in the storage medium in the form of software or firmware. The processor executes various functional applications and data processing by running the software programs and modules stored in the storage medium. The storage medium can be, but is not limited to, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a programmable read-only memory (PROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), an electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), etc. Among them, the storage medium is used to store programs, and the processor executes the programs after receiving the execution instructions.
[0123] Furthermore, the software programs and modules in the above storage medium may further include an operating system, which may include various software components and / or drivers for managing system tasks (such as memory management, storage device control, power management, etc.), and may communicate with various hardware or software components to provide a running environment for other software components. The processor can be an integrated circuit chip with signal processing capabilities. The above-mentioned processor can be a general-purpose processor, including a central processing unit (CPU), a network processor (NP), etc., which can implement or execute the various methods, steps, and logic flow block diagrams disclosed in this embodiment. The general-purpose processor can be a microprocessor or the processor can also be any conventional processor, etc.
[0124] Since the instructions stored in the storage medium can execute the steps in any of the methods provided in the embodiments of the present invention, the beneficial effects of any of the methods provided in the embodiments of the present invention can be achieved. For details, please refer to the previous embodiments and will not be elaborated here.
[0125] As described above, it is only the preferred specific embodiment of the present invention, but the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any changes or substitutions that can be easily thought of by those skilled in the art within the technical scope disclosed by the present invention should be covered within the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention should be subject to the protection scope of the claims.
Claims
1. A health monitoring method for terminal facilities based on digital twin and machine learning, which is applied to a health monitoring system for terminal facilities, and is characterized in that, The method includes: Collecting monitoring data of terminal facilities in real time based on multi-type sensor networks deployed at multiple preset monitoring points; Constructing a multi-level monitoring data visualization layer in the digital twin model, the visualization layer including a global monitoring layer and a local monitoring layer, the global monitoring layer displaying comprehensive monitoring indicators of each monitoring area, and the local monitoring layer displaying sensor data of the target area; When the change rate of the comprehensive monitoring indicators within a preset time period does not exceed a preset change threshold, dynamically displaying the change process of the comprehensive monitoring indicators in the global monitoring layer; When the change rate of the comprehensive monitoring indicators within a preset time period exceeds the preset change threshold, dynamically displaying the change process of the sensor data of the target area in the local monitoring layer; Classifying the monitoring data within a preset time period according to parameter types to obtain multiple monitoring parameter subsets, the monitoring parameter subsets including multiple sensor data of the same type; Calculating the data change rate between adjacent monitoring points within a preset time window to obtain a change rate trend, the data change rate being the change amplitude of sensor data per unit time; Calculating an initial weight coefficient based on the similarity of the change rate trends, the initial weight coefficient indicating the basic synchronization degree of sensor data of adjacent monitoring points; Correcting the initial weight coefficient according to the time difference of the mutation points of the corresponding sensor data of adjacent monitoring points within the preset time window to obtain a time series weight coefficient; Adjusting the time series weight coefficient according to the structural connection relationship between adjacent monitoring points to obtain the final weight coefficient for establishing the monitoring point network topology map, different structural connection relationships corresponding to different preset adjustment strategies of the time series weight coefficient, and the monitoring point network topology map corresponding one-to-one to the monitoring parameter subsets; In the digital twin model corresponding to the terminal facilities, determining the target path corresponding to the network topology path where adjacent weight coefficients are both greater than the first preset threshold as the abnormal transmission path corresponding to the same type of sensor data; Determining the abnormal state propagation rules of each abnormal transmission path under each preset abnormal state according to the historical monitoring data corresponding to each preset abnormal state; When it is detected that the sensor data of any monitoring point exceeds the corresponding second preset threshold range, calculating the parameter prediction values of other monitoring points in the corresponding abnormal transmission path based on the abnormal state propagation rules; If it is detected that the difference between the preset proportion of the parameter prediction values and the corresponding actual monitoring values exceeds the third preset threshold, generating a warning information including the abnormal location, the influence range and the development trend.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Before the step of collecting monitoring data of terminal facilities in real time based on multi-type sensor networks deployed at multiple preset monitoring points, it further includes: Constructing a multi-dimensional feature layer in the digital twin model corresponding to the terminal facilities, the multi-dimensional feature layer including four feature layers: a material property layer, a load distribution layer, an environmental corrosion layer and a construction quality layer; Multiply the monitoring data corresponding to different feature layers in each monitoring area by the weight coefficient corresponding to the feature layer to which the monitoring data belongs, and sum all the multiplied results to obtain a combined influence coefficient. The digital twin model includes multiple monitoring areas, and the weight coefficient is determined based on a preset expert score; Determine the importance level corresponding to each monitoring area according to the combined influence coefficient; Determine the target monitoring areas with an importance level higher than the preset level threshold as preset monitoring points.
3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of determining the abnormal state propagation rules of each abnormal transmission path under each preset abnormal state according to the historical monitoring data corresponding to each preset abnormal state specifically includes: Segment the historical monitoring data using a sliding time window, extract the abnormal occurrence time sequence of each monitoring point on the abnormal transmission path within each time window, and establish an abnormal transmission sequence; Calculate the abnormal propagation time interval between each monitoring point based on the abnormal transmission sequence, and determine the abnormal diffusion rate according to the statistical distribution characteristics of the abnormal propagation time interval; Divide the abnormal transmission path into a fast propagation section and a slow propagation section according to the abnormal diffusion rate, and establish a segmented propagation model based on the sensor data of the fast propagation section and the slow propagation section; Interpolate and fit the abnormal data of any monitoring point on the abnormal transmission path according to the segmented propagation model to generate a propagation rule curve of the abnormal state, and the propagation rule curve represents the change relationship of the abnormal state intensity with the propagation distance.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein The step of generating a warning message including the abnormal location, influence range, and development trend if it is detected that the difference between the predicted values of a preset proportion of the parameters and the corresponding actual monitoring values exceeds a third preset threshold specifically includes: Calculate an abnormal diffusion index based on the difference between the predicted value of the parameter and the actual monitoring value. The abnormal diffusion index is the ratio of the number of monitoring points exceeding the third preset threshold to the total number of monitoring points on the abnormal transmission path; Determine the abnormal level according to the relationship between the time change rate of the abnormal diffusion index and the preset diffusion threshold. The abnormal level includes a fast diffusion type abnormal and a slow diffusion type abnormal; Divide the monitoring points with a distance less than a preset distance threshold and the same abnormal level into the same abnormal influence area, and generate a spatial distribution map of the abnormal influence area; Generate a hierarchical warning message based on the abnormal level and the spatial distribution map. The hierarchical warning message includes the abnormal level, diffusion speed, boundary coordinates of the influence area, and the maximum abnormal degree within each influence area.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein After the step of generating a warning message including the abnormal location, influence range, and development trend if it is detected that the difference between the predicted values of a preset proportion of the parameters and the corresponding actual monitoring values exceeds a third preset threshold, it further includes: Count the failure types, failure locations, and failure frequencies of each component of the dock facilities within a preset time period, and generate a failure statistics table; According to the failure statistics table, combine the same type of failures with a failure frequency exceeding a preset number and adjacent locations into a failure mode; Analyze the occurrence timings of each fault in the fault mode, establish a correlation relationship between faults with a time interval less than a preset duration, and form a fault correlation network; Divide the detection priorities for the location where the fault mode is located according to the correlation degrees of each fault node in the fault correlation network, where the correlation degree is the number of faults directly connected to the fault node, and different detection priorities correspond to different manual inspection periods; Generate a maintenance schedule based on the detection priorities and the corresponding manual inspection periods.
6. A wharf facility health monitoring system, characterized in that, The dock facility health monitoring system includes: one or more processors and a memory; The memory is coupled to the one or more processors, the memory is used to store computer program code, the computer program code includes computer instructions, and the one or more processors call the computer instructions to cause the dock facility health monitoring system to execute the method according to any one of claims 1-5.
7. A computer-readable storage medium, comprising instructions, characterized in that, When the instructions run on the dock facility health monitoring system, cause the dock facility health monitoring system to execute the method according to any one of claims 1-5.
8. A computer program product, characterized in that, When the computer program product runs on the dock facility health monitoring system, cause the dock facility health monitoring system to execute the method according to any one of claims 1-5.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Thermal power plant immersion type equipment state monitoring method and system based on AI
CN119849319A