Construction supplier evaluation method and equipment based on engineering project, and medium

Abstract

The invention discloses a construction supplier evaluation method and equipment based on an engineering project, and a medium, belongs to the technical field of engineering management, and aims to solve the problems that the comprehensive score of a construction supplier is judged by human experience and lacks datamation judgment, so that the supplier is difficult to effectively and scientifically evaluate, and the evaluation efficiency is high. And accurate management of the construction suppliers is influenced. The method comprises the steps of extracting construction attribute information of an engineering construction table corresponding to a construction project based on a completion time node of the construction project; according to the construction attribute information, performing completion acceptance judgment on the construction project to obtain completion acceptance information; comprehensive evaluation based on the project construction result is carried out on the construction attribute information through completion acceptance information, and a project construction evaluation result is obtained; and according to a project construction evaluation result, performing overall evaluation of related historical cooperative engineering projects on the construction suppliers to obtain an evaluation result of each construction supplier.

Description

[0001] This application claims priority from a Chinese patent application filed with the China National Intellectual Property Administration on December 29, 2023, with the application number 202311872294.2 and the invention title "A Construction Supplier Evaluation Method, Device and Medium Based on Engineering Projects". Technical Field

[0002] This application relates to the field of project management, and particularly to a construction supplier evaluation method, device and medium based on engineering projects. Background Art

[0003] The evaluation of construction suppliers is a crucial part of the engineering construction process and plays a vital role in ensuring project quality and improving project level.

[0004] Secondly, construction suppliers are of great significance in improving project quality and level. The evaluation of the engineering quality of construction suppliers is not only a check on the safety of engineering projects, but also a comprehensive evaluation of aspects such as engineering design, construction technology, and material selection. Only through a comprehensive evaluation can the deficiencies in engineering projects be discovered and corresponding improvement suggestions be put forward. Only in this way can errors be corrected in a timely manner, the quality and level of the project be improved, and the engineering project meet higher standards and requirements.

[0005] The current comprehensive scoring of construction suppliers is judged based on human experience, lacking data-based evaluation and grading for basic data. As a result, the current calibration and grading of construction suppliers overly rely on human experience, making it difficult to effectively evaluate suppliers. Summary of the Invention

[0006] Embodiments of this application provide a construction supplier evaluation method, device and medium based on engineering projects to solve the following technical problems: The current comprehensive scoring of construction suppliers is judged based on human experience, lacking data-based judgment, making it difficult to effectively and scientifically evaluate suppliers and affecting the accurate management of construction suppliers.

[0007] Embodiments of this application adopt the following technical solutions:

[0008] On the one hand, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating construction suppliers based on engineering projects, including: extracting construction attribute information corresponding to the engineering construction table of the construction project based on the completion time node of the construction project; judging the completion acceptance of the construction project according to the construction attribute information to obtain completion acceptance information; through the completion acceptance information, comprehensively evaluating the construction attribute information based on the project construction results to obtain a project construction evaluation result; according to the project construction evaluation result, making an overall evaluation of the construction supplier regarding historical cooperative engineering projects to obtain the evaluation result of each construction supplier.

[0009] In a feasible implementation manner, it is also possible to: extract construction attribute information corresponding to the engineering construction table of the construction project based on the completion time node of the construction project; wherein, the engineering construction table includes: an engineering construction progress table, an engineering construction contract table, and an engineering change visa table; judging the completion acceptance of the construction project according to the construction attribute information to obtain completion acceptance information; through the completion acceptance information, comprehensively evaluating the construction attribute information based on the project construction results to obtain the total project construction score; according to the total project construction score, making an overall evaluation of the construction supplier regarding historical cooperative engineering projects to obtain the evaluation score of each construction supplier; determining the evaluation level of the construction supplier based on the evaluation score of each construction supplier.

[0010] By comprehensively scoring and calculating the level of the construction supplier regarding project execution status in the embodiment of the present application, the quality management of the construction supplier can be effectively carried out. Moreover, using a data-based evaluation standard can better scientifically evaluate the construction supplier, reduce the judgment of the construction level of the construction supplier based on human experience, is conducive to comprehensively evaluating the deficiencies in the engineering project, timely proposing improvement measures to the construction supplier, further improving the quality and level of the project, and enabling the engineering project to meet higher standards and requirements.

[0011] In a feasible implementation manner, the engineering construction form includes: an engineering construction progress form, an engineering construction contract form, and an engineering change visa form; based on the completion time node of the construction project, extract the construction attribute information of the engineering construction form corresponding to the construction project, specifically including: when the completion time node is the completion acceptance time node, obtain the content text information of the engineering construction form in the construction project; based on the engineering construction progress form, extract the first construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the first construction attribute information includes at least one of the completion application date, the project settlement cost, and the number of completion acceptance times; based on the engineering construction contract form, extract the second construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the second construction attribute information includes at least one of the engineering contract completion date, the engineering contract price, the quality guarantee deposit ratio, and the construction supplier; based on the engineering change visa form, extract the third construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the third construction attribute information includes at least one of the engineering visa change cost, the change completion date, and the number of construction changes; wherein, the construction attribute information includes: the first construction attribute information, the second construction attribute information, and the third construction attribute information.

[0012] In a feasible implementation manner, it is also possible to: based on the completion time node of the construction project, extract the construction attribute information of the engineering construction form corresponding to the construction project, specifically including: when the completion time node is the completion acceptance time node, obtain the content text information of the engineering construction form in the construction project; based on the engineering construction progress form, extract the first construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the first construction attribute information includes the completion application date, the project settlement cost, and the number of completion acceptance times; based on the engineering construction contract form, extract the second construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the second construction attribute information includes the engineering contract completion date, the engineering contract price, the quality guarantee deposit ratio, and the construction supplier; based on the engineering change visa form, extract the third construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the third construction attribute information includes the engineering visa change cost, the change completion date, and the number of construction changes; wherein, the construction attribute information includes: the first construction attribute information, the second construction attribute information, and the third construction attribute information.

[0013] After comprehensively extracting information from the engineering construction progress form, the engineering construction contract form, and the engineering change visa form in the embodiments of the present application, various factors affecting the construction project can be comprehensively collected, which is beneficial to the subsequent comprehensive evaluation of the construction supplier.

[0014] In a feasible implementation manner, according to the construction attribute information, the construction project is judged for completion acceptance to obtain completion acceptance information, which specifically includes: If there is an engineering visa change cost in the construction attribute information, the completion acceptance cost is determined according to the engineering visa change cost and the quality warranty deposit ratio in the construction attribute information; otherwise, based on the project contract price and the quality warranty deposit ratio in the construction attribute information, the completion acceptance cost is determined; The completion time is judged for the project contract completion date and the change completion date in the construction attribute information; If the change completion date exists in the construction attribute information, the completion date of the construction project is determined based on the change completion date; otherwise, the completion date of the construction project is determined based on the project contract completion date; wherein, the completion acceptance information includes: the completion acceptance cost and the completion date.

[0015] In a feasible implementation manner, it is also possible to: According to the construction attribute information, the construction project is judged for completion acceptance to obtain completion acceptance information, which specifically includes: If there is an engineering visa change cost in the construction attribute information, the completion acceptance cost P3 is obtained according to P3 = P2 * (1 - Z); where P2 is the engineering visa change cost and Z is the quality warranty deposit ratio in the construction attribute information; otherwise, the completion acceptance cost is only associated with the project contract price and the quality warranty deposit ratio in the construction attribute information; The completion time is judged for the project contract completion date and the change completion date in the construction attribute information; If the change completion date exists in the construction attribute information, the completion date of the construction project is kept consistent with the change completion date; otherwise, the completion date is kept consistent with the project contract completion date; wherein, the completion acceptance information includes: the completion acceptance cost and the completion date.

[0016] Through the change judgment of the construction party during completion in the embodiments of the present application, the actual completion acceptance cost and the actual completion date can be accurately extracted, preventing errors from occurring during the final settlement of costs. At the same time, the completion acceptance information can also be used as one of the comprehensive evaluation criteria for construction suppliers, which is conducive to more accurately scoring construction suppliers.

[0017] In a feasible implementation manner, a comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results is performed, including: determining the project quality score of the construction project based on the quality score of the construction project and the qualification rate of the construction project; determining the price score of the construction project based on the project settlement cost in the construction attribute information, the completion acceptance cost in the completion acceptance information, and the total price ratio score of the construction project; determining the manual evaluation score of the construction project based on the total manual evaluation ratio score of the construction project, the quality qualification rate score of the manual evaluation, the response timeliness rate score of the manual evaluation, and the project management score of the manual evaluation; determining the construction party change deduction score of the construction project based on the total construction party change deduction score and the construction party change rate of the construction project; and determining the project quality score, the price score, the manual evaluation score, and the construction party change deduction score as the first comprehensive evaluation score.

[0018] In a feasible implementation manner, it is also possible to: perform a comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results, including: obtaining the project quality score Q according to Q = Qs * An; where Qs is the quality score of the construction project; An is the qualification rate, and the value of the qualification rate An is inversely proportional to the number of completion acceptance times in the construction attribute information; obtaining the price score p of the construction project according to p = P0 / P3 * Ps; where Ps is the total price ratio score of the construction project; P0 is the project settlement cost in the construction attribute information; P3 is the completion acceptance cost in the completion acceptance information; obtaining the manual evaluation score M of the construction project according to M = Ms * (X * 40% + S * 30% + J * 30%); where Ms is the total manual evaluation ratio score of the construction project; X is the quality qualification rate score of the manual evaluation; S is the response timeliness rate score of the manual evaluation; J is the project management score of the manual evaluation; obtaining the construction party change deduction score G of the construction project according to G = Gs * B; where Gs is the total construction party change deduction score of the construction project; B is the construction party change rate, and the construction party change rate B has a positive correlation with the number of construction changes in the construction attribute information; and determining the project quality score, the price score, the manual evaluation score, and the construction party change deduction score as the first comprehensive evaluation score.

[0019] By comprehensively scoring various construction attribute information in the embodiments of the present application and using the project quality score, price score, manual evaluation score, and construction party change deduction score, it can better reflect the specific construction process quality and construction specification situation of the construction supplier, which is beneficial to comprehensively reflecting the comprehensive construction situation of the construction supplier.

[0020] In a feasible implementation manner, the comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results further includes: comparing and judging the completion date in the completion acceptance information with the completion application date in the construction attribute information; if the completion application date is later than the completion date, determining the completion payment rate score based on the total score of the delivery rate proportion of the construction project, the completion application date in the construction attribute information, and the completion date in the completion acceptance information; if the completion application date is earlier than the completion date, determining the completion payment rate score based on the total score of the delivery rate proportion; and determining the completion payment rate score as the second comprehensive evaluation score.

[0021] In a feasible implementation manner, it is also possible to: the comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results further includes: comparing and judging the completion date in the completion acceptance information with the completion application date in the construction attribute information; if the completion application date is later than the completion date, obtaining the completion payment rate score d according to d = Ds*(D - D3) / D3; where Ds is the total score of the delivery rate proportion of the construction project; D is the completion application date in the construction attribute information; D3 is the completion date in the completion acceptance information; if the completion application date is earlier than the completion date, keeping the completion payment rate score consistent with the total score of the delivery rate proportion; and determining the completion payment rate score as the second comprehensive evaluation score.

[0022] In the embodiment of the present application, after comparing the completion application date and the completion date of the construction supplier, according to different date and time, the completion payment rate score of the construction supplier is calculated, which is beneficial to further digitally control the construction process and construction quality, and improve the comprehensive evaluation of the construction supplier.

[0023] In a feasible implementation manner, through the completion acceptance information, the comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results is carried out to obtain the project construction evaluation result, specifically including: determining the project construction evaluation result according to the project quality score in the first comprehensive evaluation score, the completion payment rate score in the second comprehensive evaluation score, the price score in the first comprehensive evaluation score, the manual evaluation score in the first comprehensive evaluation score, and the total deduction score of the construction party change in the first comprehensive evaluation score.

[0024] In a feasible implementation manner, it is also possible to: perform a comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction result through the completion acceptance information to obtain the total project construction score, specifically including: obtaining the total project construction score F according to F = Q + d + p + M - G; where Q is the project quality score in the first comprehensive evaluation score; d is the completion payment rate score in the second comprehensive evaluation score; p is the price score in the first comprehensive evaluation score; M is the manual evaluation score in the first comprehensive evaluation score; and G is the total deduction score for construction party changes in the first comprehensive evaluation score.

[0025] In the embodiment of the present application, after integrating the comprehensive evaluation scores, the project construction evaluation result of a certain construction project can be obtained, which is beneficial to the overall evaluation of the construction project, thereby reflecting the comprehensive score of the corresponding construction supplier and being beneficial to subsequent use as the basic scoring data of the construction supplier.

[0026] In a feasible implementation manner, based on the project construction evaluation result, an overall evaluation of the construction supplier for the historical cooperative engineering projects is performed to obtain the evaluation result of each construction supplier, including: performing an overall evaluation of the construction supplier for the historical cooperative engineering projects based on the project construction evaluation result to obtain the evaluation result of each construction supplier; and determining the evaluation grade of the construction supplier based on the evaluation result of each construction supplier.

[0027] In a feasible implementation manner, based on the project construction evaluation result, an overall evaluation of the construction supplier for the historical cooperative engineering projects is performed to obtain the evaluation result of each construction supplier, specifically including: performing a numerical judgment on the project construction evaluation result; if the value of the project construction evaluation result is zero, determining the construction supplier as a temporarily non - cooperative party and determining the subsequent cooperation guarantee amount of the construction supplier based on a preset guarantee amount base; if the value of the project construction evaluation result is not zero, determining the evaluation result of each construction supplier according to the project construction evaluation result and the number of historical cooperative engineering projects of each construction supplier; or, determining the evaluation grade of the construction supplier based on the evaluation result of each construction supplier, specifically including: performing interval division on the evaluation result of each construction supplier based on a preset score grade division interval to obtain the evaluation grade of each construction supplier; where the evaluation grade includes at least one of excellent, good, qualified, and unqualified.

[0028] In a feasible implementation, it is also possible to: based on the total project construction score, conduct an overall evaluation of the construction suppliers regarding historical cooperative engineering projects, and obtain the evaluation scores of each construction supplier, specifically including: making a numerical judgment on the total project construction score; if the value of the total project construction score is zero, determining the construction supplier as a temporarily non-cooperative party, and based on a preset bond base, determining the subsequent cooperation bond of the construction supplier; if the value of the total project construction score is not zero, obtaining the evaluation score Fv of each construction supplier according to Fv = ∑Fn / Y; where Fn is the total project construction score of each historical cooperative engineering project of the construction supplier; and Y is the number of historical cooperative engineering projects.

[0029] In a feasible implementation, it is also possible to: based on the evaluation scores of each construction supplier, determine the evaluation grades of the construction suppliers, specifically including: based on a preset score grade division interval, dividing the evaluation scores of each construction supplier into intervals to obtain the evaluation grades of each construction supplier; where the evaluation grades include: excellent, good, qualified, and unqualified.

[0030] Through the judgment of the project construction evaluation results in the implementation of this application, the first screening of construction suppliers is achieved, that is, the non-cooperative parties are screened out, and then the evaluation scores of the cooperative construction suppliers are calculated, which is conducive to accurately obtaining the evaluation results of each construction supplier. It can also use the preset score grade division interval to partition the evaluation results of each construction supplier, which is conducive to classifying different construction suppliers, determining the evaluation grades of each construction supplier, realizing the digital management of construction suppliers, improving the supplier reward and punishment mechanism, and reducing the failure rate of construction projects.

[0031] In a second aspect, the embodiments of this application also provide a construction supplier evaluation device based on engineering projects, where the device includes: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; where the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, so that the at least one processor can execute a construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to any of the above embodiments.

[0032] In a third aspect, the embodiments of this application also provide a non-volatile computer storage medium, characterized in that the storage medium is a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, and the non-volatile computer-readable storage medium stores at least one program, and each program includes instructions that, when executed by a terminal, cause the terminal to execute a construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to any of the above embodiments.

[0033] The present application provides a method, device and medium for evaluating construction suppliers based on engineering projects. Compared with the prior art, the implementation of the present application has the following beneficial technical effects:

[0034] In the embodiment of the present application, by comprehensively scoring and calculating the grade of the construction suppliers of the engineering project regarding the project execution status, the quality management of the construction suppliers can be effectively carried out. Moreover, by using a data-based evaluation criterion, the construction suppliers can be scientifically evaluated better, reducing the judgment of the construction level of the construction suppliers based on human experience, which is beneficial to comprehensively evaluating the deficiencies existing in the engineering project, timely putting forward improvement measures to the construction suppliers, further improving the quality and level of the project, and enabling the engineering project to meet higher standards and requirements. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0035] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application or the prior art, the following will briefly introduce the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments or the prior art. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments recorded in the present application. For those of ordinary skill in the art, without creative efforts, other drawings can also be obtained based on these drawings. In the drawings:

[0036] Figure 1 is the first flow chart of a method for evaluating construction suppliers based on engineering projects provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0037] Figure 2 is the second flow chart of a method for evaluating construction suppliers based on engineering projects provided by an embodiment of the present application;

[0038] Figure 3 is the structural schematic diagram of a device for evaluating construction suppliers based on engineering projects provided by an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0039] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in the present application, the following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of this specification, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.

[0040] The embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating construction suppliers based on engineering projects, as Figure 1 and Figure 2 shown. The method for evaluating construction suppliers based on engineering projects specifically includes steps S101 - S105:

[0041] S101. Extract the construction attribute information of the engineering construction table corresponding to the construction project based on the completion time node of the construction project. Among them, the engineering construction table includes: the engineering construction progress table, the engineering construction contract table, and the engineering change visa table.

[0042] Specifically, when the completion time node is the completion acceptance time node, obtain the content text information of the engineering construction table in the construction project. That is, identify and collect the text features in the engineering construction progress table, the engineering construction contract table, and the engineering change visa table.

[0043] Furthermore, based on the engineering construction progress table, extract the first construction attribute information of the construction project. Among them, the first construction attribute information includes: the completion application date, the project settlement cost, and the number of completion acceptance times. Further, based on the engineering construction contract table, extract the second construction attribute information of the construction project. Among them, the second construction attribute information includes at least one of the engineering contract completion date, the engineering contract price, the quality warranty deposit ratio, and the construction supplier.

[0044] Furthermore, based on the engineering change visa table, extract the third construction attribute information of the construction project. Among them, the third construction attribute information includes at least one of the engineering visa change cost, the change completion date, and the number of construction changes. And the construction attribute information includes at least one of the first construction attribute information, the second construction attribute information, and the third construction attribute information.

[0045] As a feasible implementation method, after comprehensively extracting the information from the engineering construction progress table, the engineering construction contract table, and the engineering change visa table, various factors affecting the construction project can be comprehensively collected, which is beneficial to the subsequent comprehensive evaluation of the construction supplier.

[0046] S102. According to the construction attribute information, conduct a completion acceptance judgment on the construction project to obtain the completion acceptance information.

[0047] Specifically, first judge whether the extracted engineering visa change cost exists. If there is an engineering visa change cost in the construction attribute information, then according to P3 = P2 * (1 - Z), obtain the completion acceptance cost P3. Where P2 is the engineering visa change cost, and Z is the quality warranty deposit ratio in the construction attribute information. Otherwise, the completion acceptance cost is only associated with the engineering contract price and the quality warranty deposit ratio in the construction attribute information.

[0048] Furthermore, it is necessary to judge the completion time of the engineering contract completion date and the change completion date in the construction attribute information:

[0049] If there is a changed completion date in the construction attribute information, then keep the completion date of the construction project consistent with the changed completion date. Otherwise, keep the completion date consistent with the completion date in the project contract. The completion acceptance information includes: completion acceptance fees and the completion date.

[0050] In one embodiment, based on the project contract price P1, the project visa change fee P2, and the quality warranty deposit ratio Z obtained from the construction attribute information, calculate the settlement fee required for the project agreement to pass the completion acceptance, that is, the completion acceptance fee P3: If the project visa change fee P2 has a value, then P3 = P2 * (1 - Z); if the project visa change fee P2 has no value, then P3 = P1 * (1 - Z). First, obtain the project contract completion date D1 and the changed completion date D2, and then calculate the completion date D3 agreed upon in the project agreement. If the changed completion date D2 has a value, then D3 = D2; if the changed completion date D2 has no value, then D3 = D1.

[0051] S103. Through the completion acceptance information, conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results to obtain the project construction evaluation result. Among them, the data representation form of the project construction evaluation result can be represented by a total project construction score. That is, the total project construction score can be used as a data form associated with the project construction evaluation result.

[0052] Specifically, the project quality score Q of the construction project can be obtained according to Q = Qs * An; where Qs is the quality score of the construction project. An is the pass rate, and the value of the pass rate An is inversely proportional to the number of completion acceptance times in the construction attribute information.

[0053] Further, use p = P0 / P3 * Ps to obtain the price score p of the construction project. Where Ps is the total score of the price proportion of the construction project. P0 is the project settlement fee in the construction attribute information. P3 is the completion acceptance fee in the completion acceptance information.

[0054] Further, the manual evaluation score M of the construction project can also be obtained according to M = Ms * (X * 40% + S * 30% + J * 30%); where Ms is the total score of the manual evaluation proportion of the construction project. X is the quality pass rate score of the manual evaluation. S is the response timeliness rate score of the manual evaluation. J is the project management score of the manual evaluation.

[0055] Further, then use G = Gs * B to obtain the construction party change deduction score G of the construction project. Where Gs is the total score of the construction party change deductions of the construction project. B is the construction party change rate, and the construction party change rate B has a positive correlation with the number of construction changes in the construction attribute information. Optionally, Gs = 10.

[0056] Further, determine the project quality score, price score, manual evaluation score, and the deduction score for construction party changes as the first comprehensive evaluation score.

[0057] As a feasible implementation method, after comprehensively scoring various construction attribute information, using the project quality score, price score, manual evaluation score, and the deduction score for construction party changes can better reflect the specific construction process quality and construction specification of the construction supplier, which is beneficial to comprehensively reflecting the comprehensive construction situation of the construction supplier. Optionally, Quality score Qs + Delivery rate proportion total score Ds + Price proportion total score Ps + Manual evaluation proportion total score Ms = 100.

[0058] Further, it is also necessary to compare and judge the completion date in the completion acceptance information with the completion application date in the construction attribute information:

[0059] If the completion application date is later than the completion date, then according to d = Ds * (D - D3) / D3, obtain the completion payment rate score d. Where Ds is the delivery rate proportion total score of the construction project. D is the completion application date in the construction attribute information. D3 is the completion date in the completion acceptance information.

[0060] Further, if the completion application date is earlier than the completion date, keep the completion payment rate score consistent with the delivery rate proportion total score. Finally, determine the completion payment rate score as the second comprehensive evaluation score.

[0061] In an embodiment, based on the completion application date D obtained from the construction attribute information and the completion date D3 in the completion acceptance information, calculate the completion payment rate score d. When the completion application date D is earlier than the agreed completion date D3, the completion payment rate score d = delivery rate proportion total score Ds. When the completion application date D is later than the agreed completion date D3, the completion payment rate score d = delivery rate proportion total score Ds * (D - D3) / D3, where (D - D3) represents the number of days of construction delay.

[0062] Further, according to F = Q + d + p + M - G, obtain the total project construction score F. Where Q is the project quality score in the first comprehensive evaluation score. d is the completion payment rate score in the second comprehensive evaluation score. p is the price score in the first comprehensive evaluation score. M is the manual evaluation score in the first comprehensive evaluation score. G is the total deduction score for construction party changes in the first comprehensive evaluation score.

[0063] As a feasible implementation, after integrating the comprehensive evaluation scores (the first comprehensive evaluation score and the second comprehensive evaluation score) uniformly, the total project construction score of a certain construction project can be obtained, which is beneficial to the overall evaluation of the construction project, thereby reflecting the comprehensive score of the corresponding construction supplier and being beneficial as the basic scoring data for the subsequent construction supplier.

[0064] S104. According to the project construction evaluation results, conduct an overall evaluation of the construction suppliers for the historical cooperative engineering projects, and obtain the evaluation results of each construction supplier. Among them, the data representation form of the evaluation results of each construction supplier can be completed by using an evaluation score for each construction supplier. That is, the evaluation score can be used as a data form associated with the evaluation results.

[0065] Specifically, first make a numerical judgment on the total project construction score:

[0066] If the value of the total project construction score is zero, then determine the construction supplier as a temporarily non-cooperative party, and based on the preset deposit base, determine the subsequent cooperation deposit of the construction supplier.

[0067] Furthermore, if the value of the total project construction score is not zero, then according to Fv = ∑Fn / Y, obtain the evaluation score Fv of each construction supplier. Wherein, Fn is the total project construction score of each historical cooperative engineering project of the construction supplier. Y is the number of historical cooperative engineering projects.

[0068] In an embodiment, when the total project construction score F of a certain construction project is 0, subtract 50 points from the comprehensive score of the corresponding construction supplier, and it is not allowed to cooperate again within one year. After one year, it is necessary to re-pay the deposit to allow the corresponding construction supplier to enter the cooperation process, and the subsequent cooperation deposit to be paid = (60 - the total project construction score F) * the deposit base. And when the total project construction score F ≠ 0, include the corresponding comprehensive score in the project score table, calculate the latest score Fv of the construction supplier = ∑Fn / Y, and update the corresponding evaluation level according to the latest score in the subsequent process.

[0069] Preferably, it further includes S105: Based on the evaluation scores of each construction supplier, determine the evaluation level of the construction supplier.

[0070] Specifically, based on the preset score level division intervals, divide the evaluation scores of each construction supplier into intervals to obtain the evaluation levels of each construction supplier. Among them, the evaluation levels include: excellent, good, qualified, and unqualified.

[0071] In one embodiment, based on a preset score grade division interval, the evaluation scores of each construction supplier are divided into intervals. An evaluation score of 90 or above is determined as the excellent grade, an evaluation score of 80 - 89 is determined as the good grade, an evaluation score of 60 - 79 is determined as the qualified grade, and below 60 is the unqualified grade. And for construction suppliers in the unqualified grade, a deposit needs to be paid for subsequent cooperation. The deposit to be paid = (60 - scoring score Fv) * deposit basis.

[0072] In addition, the embodiment of the present application also provides a construction supplier evaluation device based on an engineering project, as Figure 3 shown. The construction supplier evaluation device 300 based on an engineering project specifically includes:

[0073] At least one processor 301. And a memory 302 communicatively connected to at least one processor 301. Among them, the memory 302 stores instructions that can be executed by at least one processor 301, so that at least one processor 301 can execute:

[0074] Based on the completion time node of the construction project, extract the construction attribute information of the engineering construction form corresponding to the construction project; among them, the engineering construction form includes: the engineering construction progress form, the engineering construction contract form, and the engineering change visa form;

[0075] According to the construction attribute information, perform an acceptance check judgment on the construction project to obtain the acceptance check information;

[0076] Through the acceptance check information, perform a comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction result to obtain the total project construction score;

[0077] According to the total project construction score, perform an overall evaluation of the construction supplier for the historical cooperative engineering projects to obtain the evaluation score of each construction supplier;

[0078] Based on the evaluation score of each construction supplier, determine the evaluation grade of the construction supplier.

[0079] The present application provides a construction supplier evaluation method, device and medium based on an engineering project. By performing a comprehensive score and grade calculation on the construction supplier of the engineering project regarding the project execution status, it can effectively conduct quality management on the construction supplier. And by using a data - based evaluation standard, it can better scientifically evaluate the construction supplier, reduce the judgment of the construction level of the construction supplier based on human experience, is conducive to comprehensively assessing the deficiencies in the engineering project, timely proposing improvement measures to the construction supplier, further improving the quality and level of the project, and enabling the engineering project to meet higher standards and requirements.

[0080] The various embodiments in this application are all described in a progressive manner. For the same or similar parts among the various embodiments, reference can be made to each other, and the key points of each embodiment are the differences from other embodiments. In particular, for the device and medium embodiments, since they are basically similar to the method embodiments, the description is relatively simple, and reference can be made to the relevant parts of the method embodiments for the related content.

[0081] The devices and media provided in the embodiments of this application correspond one by one to the methods. Therefore, the devices and media also have beneficial technical effects similar to those of their corresponding methods. Since the beneficial technical effects of the methods have been described in detail above, the beneficial technical effects of the devices and media will not be elaborated here.

[0082] Those skilled in the art should understand that the embodiments of this application can be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, this application can take the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Moreover, this application can take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk memories, CD-ROMs, optical memories, etc.) that contain computer-usable program code.

[0083] This application is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to the embodiments of this application. It should be understood that each flow and / or block in the flowchart and / or block diagram, as well as the combination of flows and / or blocks in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to the processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded processor, or other programmable data processing devices to generate a machine, such that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing devices generate means for implementing the functions specified in Figure 1 one flow or multiple flows and / or blocks Figure 1 one block or multiple blocks.

[0084] These computer program instructions can also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing device to work in a specific manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory generate a manufactured article including instruction means, and the instruction means implement the functions specified in Figure 1 one flow or multiple flows and / or blocks Figure 1 one block or multiple blocks.

[0085] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device, so that a series of operation steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to generate a computer-implemented process, and thus the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable device provide steps for implementing the functions specified in one process Figure 1 one process or multiple processes and / or blocks Figure 1 steps of the functions specified in one block or multiple blocks.

[0086] In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), an input / output interface, a network interface, and memory.

[0087] The memory may include non-permanent memory in the form of computer-readable media, random access memory (RAM) and / or non-volatile memory such as read-only memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM). Memory is an example of computer-readable media.

[0088] Computer-readable media includes permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable media and can be implemented by any method or technology for information storage. The information can be computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technologies, compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disc (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassette tapes, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transmission media that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, computer-readable media does not include transitory media such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.

[0089] It should also be noted that the term "comprising", "including" or any other variant thereof is intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, commodity or device comprising a series of elements not only includes those elements, but also includes other elements not expressly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, commodity or device. Without further limitation, an element defined by the statement "comprising an..." does not exclude the presence of additional identical elements in the process, method, commodity or device comprising the element.

[0090] The above are only embodiments of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. For those skilled in the art, various changes and modifications can be made to the present application. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included within the scope of the claims of the present application.

Claims

1. A construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects, characterized in that The method includes: Based on the completion time node of the construction project, extracting the construction attribute information of the engineering construction form corresponding to the construction project; According to the construction attribute information, making a judgment on the completion acceptance of the construction project to obtain completion acceptance information; Through the completion acceptance information, making a comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results to obtain a project construction evaluation result; According to the project construction evaluation result, making an overall evaluation of the construction suppliers regarding historical cooperative engineering projects to obtain the evaluation results of each construction supplier.

2. The construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to claim 1, characterized in that, The engineering construction form includes: an engineering construction progress form, an engineering construction contract form, and an engineering change visa form; based on the completion time node of the construction project, extracting the construction attribute information of the engineering construction form corresponding to the construction project, specifically including: When the completion time node is the completion acceptance time node, obtaining the content text information of the engineering construction form in the construction project; Based on the engineering construction progress form, extracting the first construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the first construction attribute information includes at least one of the completion application date, the project settlement cost, and the number of completion acceptance times; Based on the engineering construction contract form, extracting the second construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the second construction attribute information includes at least one of the engineering contract completion date, the engineering contract price, the quality warranty deposit ratio, and the construction supplier; Based on the engineering change visa form, extracting the third construction attribute information of the construction project; wherein, the third construction attribute information includes at least one of the engineering visa change cost, the change completion date, and the number of construction changes; Wherein, the construction attribute information includes: the first construction attribute information, the second construction attribute information, and the third construction attribute information.

3. The construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to claim 1, wherein, According to the construction attribute information, making a judgment on the completion acceptance of the construction project to obtain completion acceptance information, specifically including: If there is an engineering visa change cost in the construction attribute information, determining the completion acceptance cost according to the engineering visa change cost and the quality warranty deposit ratio in the construction attribute information; otherwise, determining the completion acceptance cost based on the engineering contract price and the quality warranty deposit ratio in the construction attribute information; Making a judgment on the completion time of the engineering contract completion date and the change completion date in the construction attribute information; If there is a change completion date in the construction attribute information, determining the completion date of the construction project based on the change completion date; otherwise, determining the completion date of the construction project based on the engineering contract completion date; wherein, the completion acceptance information includes: the completion acceptance cost and the completion date.

4. The construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to claim 1, wherein Making a comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results, including: Based on the quality score of the construction project and the qualified rate of the construction project, determining the project quality score of the construction project; Determine the price score of the construction project based on the project settlement cost in the construction attribute information, the completion acceptance cost in the completion acceptance information, and the total score of the price proportion of the construction project; Determine the manual evaluation score of the construction project based on the total score of the manual evaluation proportion of the construction project, the quality qualification rate score of the manual evaluation, the response timeliness rate score of the manual evaluation, and the project management score of the manual evaluation; Determine the deduction score for the construction party change of the construction project based on the total deduction score for the construction party change of the construction project and the construction party change rate; Determine the project quality score, the price score, the manual evaluation score, and the deduction score for the construction party change as the first comprehensive evaluation score.

5. The construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to claim 4, characterized in that The comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results further includes: Compare and judge the completion date in the completion acceptance information with the completion application date in the construction attribute information; If the completion application date is later than the completion date, determine the completion payment rate score based on the total score of the delivery rate proportion of the construction project, the completion application date in the construction attribute information, and the completion date in the completion acceptance information; If the completion application date is earlier than the completion date, determine the completion payment rate score based on the total score of the delivery rate proportion; Determine the completion payment rate score as the second comprehensive evaluation score.

6. The construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to claim 1, wherein, Through the completion acceptance information, conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the construction attribute information based on the project construction results to obtain the project construction evaluation result, specifically including: Determine the project construction evaluation result based on the project quality score in the first comprehensive evaluation score, the completion payment rate score in the second comprehensive evaluation score, the price score in the first comprehensive evaluation score, the manual evaluation score in the first comprehensive evaluation score, and the total deduction score for the construction party change in the first comprehensive evaluation score.

7. The construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to claim 1, wherein Based on the project construction evaluation result, conduct an overall evaluation of the construction suppliers for the historical cooperative engineering projects to obtain the evaluation result of each construction supplier, including: Based on the project construction evaluation result, conduct an overall evaluation of the construction suppliers for the historical cooperative engineering projects to obtain the evaluation result of each construction supplier; Determine the evaluation grade of the construction supplier based on the evaluation result of each construction supplier.

8. The construction supplier evaluation method based on engineering projects according to claim 7, wherein Based on the project construction evaluation result, conduct an overall evaluation of the construction suppliers for the historical cooperative engineering projects to obtain the evaluation result of each construction supplier, specifically including: Conduct a numerical judgment on the project construction evaluation result; If the value of the project construction evaluation result is zero, determine the construction supplier as a temporarily non-cooperative party, and determine the subsequent cooperation deposit of the construction supplier based on the preset deposit base; If the value of the project construction evaluation result is not zero, determine the evaluation result of each construction supplier based on the project construction evaluation result of each historical cooperative engineering project of the construction supplier and the number of historical cooperative engineering projects; Alternatively, based on the evaluation results of each of the construction suppliers, determine the evaluation grades of the construction suppliers, specifically including: Based on a preset score grade division interval, divide the evaluation results of each of the construction suppliers into intervals to obtain the evaluation grades of each of the construction suppliers; wherein, the evaluation grades include at least one of excellent, good, qualified, and unqualified.

9. A construction supplier evaluation device based on engineering projects, characterized in that, The device includes: At least one processor; and, A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, enabling the at least one processor to execute a method for evaluating construction suppliers based on an engineering project according to any one of claims 1-8.

10. A non-volatile computer storage medium, characterized in that, The storage medium is a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, and the non-volatile computer-readable storage medium stores at least one program, each program including instructions that, when executed by a terminal, cause the terminal to execute a method for evaluating construction suppliers based on an engineering project according to any one of claims 1-8.

Images