Rail transit network automatic fare collection equipment state fusion evaluation system and method

Abstract

The invention provides a state fusion evaluation system and method for automatic fare collection equipment of a rail transit network. The evaluation system comprises a data storage module, an evaluation management module, an authority configuration module, a data acquisition module and a state evaluation module. And the data storage module stores automatic fare collection equipment information and evaluation personnel information. And the evaluation management module creates and allocates evaluation tasks for evaluators based on the automatic fare collection equipment information. And the authority configuration module configures the work authority of the evaluator according to the evaluator information and the allocated evaluation task. The data acquisition module acquires state information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic fare collection equipment. The state evaluation module evaluates the state of the automatic fare collection equipment according to the collected state information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic fare collection equipment and based on a preset evaluation standard, and generates an evaluation result and / or a subsequent operation and maintenance strategy. According to the invention, a unified equipment evaluation standard can be established, and unified management of the whole network equipment state is realized.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of rail transit automatic ticket vending and checking equipment evaluation, and in particular to a rail transit line network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion evaluation system and method. Background Art

[0002] With the acceleration of urbanization and the continuous expansion of population, rail transit, as an efficient, convenient, and environmentally friendly mode of public transportation, plays an increasingly important role in modern urban transportation systems. In rail transit operations and management, automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, as the core system for passenger entry and exit and ticket processing, has a direct impact on rail transit's operational efficiency and service quality due to its stability and reliability. Through devices such as automatic ticket vending machines, automatic ticket checking machines, and semi-automatic ticket machines, automatic ticket vending and checking equipment automates functions such as ticket sales, ticket checking, billing, and statistics, significantly improving operational efficiency, reducing labor costs, and providing passengers with a more convenient travel experience.

[0003] However, as the scale of rail transit networks continues to expand, the number of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment has also exploded. A rail transit line typically includes dozens of stations, each equipped with multiple automatic ticket vending machines, automatic ticket checking machines, and other equipment. This brings the number of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment in the entire network to thousands or even tens of thousands. This massive scale of equipment poses significant challenges to equipment status management and maintenance.

[0004] At present, the status management and maintenance of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment in rail transit lines mainly rely on regular manual inspections and maintenance, but this method has many disadvantages: First, manual regular maintenance is difficult to achieve timeliness and accuracy: if the manual inspection cycle is long, it is difficult to detect potential equipment failures in time, which can easily cause delays in equipment failure handling and affect passengers' travel experience. Regular inspections of some equipment with low usage frequency can easily cause unnecessary waste of resources; second, the evaluation standards for automatic ticket vending and checking equipment on different lines or stations are not unified, and the evaluation data is difficult to use systematically. There is a lack of effective integration and sharing mechanisms, making it difficult to form a global equipment status view, which is not conducive to the coordinated allocation and optimization of operation and maintenance resources; third, manual evaluation is highly subjective, and there is a lack of unified evaluation standards and data collection specifications, resulting in inaccurate and unreliable evaluation results, which is not conducive to the formulation of scientific and reasonable maintenance strategies. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion evaluation system and method to solve the above problems, establish scientific and unified equipment evaluation standards, and realize unified management and monitoring of the equipment status of the entire line network.

[0006] The present invention proposes a rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system, comprising:

[0007] A data storage module for storing automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information and assessment personnel information, wherein the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information includes station and line information, and the assessment personnel information includes department and position information;

[0008] The assessment management module creates and assigns assessment tasks to assessors based on the information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment;

[0009] The authority configuration module configures the evaluator's work authority based on the evaluator's information and the assigned evaluation tasks;

[0010] Data collection module, which collects status information and historical operation and maintenance information of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment;

[0011] The status assessment module assesses the status of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment based on the collected status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment and based on preset assessment criteria, and generates assessment results and / or subsequent operation and maintenance strategies.

[0012] In one embodiment, the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information further includes equipment number, equipment name, and equipment model, and the evaluator information further includes contact information.

[0013] In one embodiment, the assessment management module includes a task setting unit and a task allocation unit;

[0014] The task setting unit is used to create an evaluation task, wherein the evaluation task includes the evaluation equipment and its corresponding evaluation dimensions, evaluation criteria, weights of each evaluation dimension, and evaluation period. The evaluation dimensions include equipment operation status, historical operation status, and historical maintenance status. The evaluation criteria are the basis for scoring each evaluation dimension on a percentage basis. The weight value of each evaluation dimension is any value between 0 and 1, and the sum of the weight values ​​of all evaluation dimensions is 1.

[0015] The task allocation unit is used to allocate the evaluation task to the corresponding evaluation personnel according to the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information and the evaluation personnel information.

[0016] In one embodiment, the rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system also includes a task progress monitoring module, which is used to monitor the progress of the assessment task and, based on the set assessment cycle, remind the evaluator when he fails to complete the assessment task on time.

[0017] In one embodiment, each evaluation dimension is provided with a plurality of sub-indicators, and each sub-indicator of each evaluation dimension is also scored on a percentage basis;

[0018] Sub-indicators of device operation status include device response speed, memory usage, and whether there is an emergency mode;

[0019] Sub-indicators of historical operation status include the number of historical failures and operating time;

[0020] Sub-indicators of historical maintenance status include the number of maintenance times and maintenance frequency.

[0021] In one embodiment, the score of an evaluation dimension is obtained by weighted summing the scores of all its sub-indicators. The weight value of each sub-indicator of an evaluation dimension is any value between 0 and 1, and the sum of the weight values ​​of all sub-indicators of an evaluation dimension is 1.

[0022] In one embodiment, the evaluation dimension also includes spare parts and supplies;

[0023] The data acquisition module also collects spare parts and material information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment;

[0024] The sub-indicators of the spare parts material situation include whether there are spare parts for automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, whether the spare parts have been discontinued, and whether there are substitutes.

[0025] In one embodiment, the evaluation result is obtained by weighted summation of the scores of all evaluation dimensions. The evaluation result is a value between 0-100. Multiple evaluation levels are set according to the evaluation result value, and each evaluation level corresponds to a different subsequent operation and maintenance strategy for the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment.

[0026] The present invention also proposes a method for fusion evaluation of the status of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment in a rail transit network. The method is applied to the above-mentioned fusion evaluation system for the status of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment in a rail transit network, and comprises the following steps:

[0027] Based on the information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, an assessment task is created and assigned to the assessor. The assessment task includes the assessment equipment and its corresponding assessment dimensions, assessment criteria, and weights of each assessment dimension. The assessment dimensions include the equipment's operating status, historical operating status, and historical maintenance status. The assessment criteria are the basis for scoring each assessment dimension on a percentage basis. The weight value of each assessment dimension is any value between 0 and 1, and the sum of the weight values ​​of all assessment dimensions is 1.

[0028] Configure the evaluator's work permissions based on the evaluator's information and the evaluation tasks assigned to them;

[0029] The assessors collected the status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment;

[0030] Based on the collected status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, and based on preset evaluation criteria, the status of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment is evaluated to generate evaluation results and / or subsequent operation and maintenance strategies. The evaluation result is obtained by weighted summation of the scores of all evaluation dimensions, and the evaluation result is a numerical value between 0-100.

[0031] In one embodiment, multiple evaluation levels are set according to the numerical value of the evaluation result, and each evaluation level corresponds to a different subsequent operation and maintenance strategy of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment.

[0032] Compared with the prior art, the rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system and method of the present invention have the following beneficial effects:

[0033] 1) The present invention can integrate and analyze the status data of all automatic ticket vending and checking equipment in the entire line network, realize comprehensive monitoring of the equipment operation status, avoid equipment failure delays or frequent maintenance caused by untimely manual inspections, provide a scientific basis for the allocation of operation and maintenance resources, significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of equipment management, contribute to the accurate evaluation and efficient management of rail transit equipment, improve the quality and management level of equipment operation and maintenance, and enhance the digitalization and intelligence level of rail transit.

[0034] 2) This invention establishes a unified, scientific, and objective set of equipment status assessment standards. By quantifying and scoring multiple dimensions of automated ticket vending and checking equipment and combining them with weights to calculate comprehensive assessment results, it avoids the subjectivity and arbitrariness of manual assessments, making the assessment results more objective and reliable. Furthermore, the weights of each assessment dimension can be adjusted, increasing the flexibility of the assessment.

[0035] 3) The present invention can effectively reduce the equipment failure rate through timely equipment status monitoring and maintenance, ensure the normal operation of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, avoid problems such as passenger queuing and detention due to equipment failure, and thus improve passengers' travel experience and satisfaction. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0036] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0037] Figure 2 This is a flow chart of a method for fusion assessment of the status of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment in a rail transit network according to an embodiment of the present invention;

[0038] Figure 3 The figure is a flow chart of personnel-based assessment of a method for fusion assessment of the status of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment in a rail transit network according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0039] Reference numerals

[0040] 100, data storage module; 200, assessment management module; 201, task setting unit; 202, task allocation unit; 300, authority configuration module; 400, data acquisition module; 500, status assessment module; 600, task progress monitoring module. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0041] In order to make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more understandable, the present invention is further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. It should be noted that many specific details are set forth in the following description to facilitate a full understanding of the present invention, but the present invention can also be implemented in other ways different from those described herein, and those skilled in the art can make similar generalizations without violating the connotation of the present invention. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed below.

[0042] Secondly, "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" in this application refers to specific features, structures, or characteristics that can be included in at least one implementation of the present invention. The appearance of "in one embodiment" or "an embodiment" in different places in this specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor does it refer to an embodiment that is separate or selectively mutually exclusive with other embodiments. The terms "including" and "comprising" indicate the presence of the claimed features, but do not exclude the presence of one or more other features. The term "and / or" as used in this application includes any and all combinations of one or more of the relevant listed items.

[0043] This invention proposes a rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion evaluation system, see Figure 1, including a data storage module 100, an assessment management module 200, an authority configuration module 300, a data acquisition module 400, a status assessment module 500 and a task progress monitoring module 600. The data storage module 100 is used to store automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information and assessor information. The automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information includes equipment number, equipment name, equipment model, station to which it belongs, line information, etc., and the assessor information includes department to which it belongs, position information, contact information, etc., providing basic data for the assessment task. The assessment management module 200 is used to create and assign assessment tasks for assessors based on the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information. The authority configuration module 300 configures the assessor's work authority based on the assessor information and the assessment task assigned to them. The authority configuration module 300 can also be used to perform operations such as role assignment, addition and deletion of assessors to ensure that different assessors have corresponding access rights and operation permissions. The data acquisition module 400 collects the status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment by connecting to sensor devices, communication equipment or input after on-site acceptance by assessors. Historical operation and maintenance information, that is, historical operation and maintenance information, including historical fault conditions, historical maintenance conditions, etc. The status assessment module 500 is used to evaluate the status of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment based on the collected status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, and based on preset assessment standards, to generate assessment results and / or subsequent operation and maintenance strategies. The status assessment module 500 can also generate an assessment report, and automatically generate a detailed report according to a preset template based on the relevant assessment information and assessment results of the collected automatic ticket vending and checking equipment. At the same time, the assessment report can be viewed, exported and reviewed through this module. The task progress monitoring module 600 is used to monitor the progress of the assessment task, and according to the set assessment cycle, remind the evaluator when he fails to complete the assessment task on time.

[0044] Among them, automatic ticket vending and checking equipment includes station computers, automatic ticket vending machines, semi-automatic ticket vending machines, and automatic ticket checking machines.

[0045] The evaluation management module 200 of one embodiment of the present invention includes a task setting unit 201 and a task assignment unit 202. The task setting unit 201 is used to create an evaluation task. Generally, the evaluation task includes the evaluation equipment and its corresponding evaluation dimensions, evaluation standards, weights of each evaluation dimension, and evaluation cycle. The evaluation dimensions include equipment operation status, historical operation status, historical maintenance status, and spare parts and materials status (the data acquisition module 400 also collects spare parts and materials information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment). The evaluation standard is the basis for scoring each evaluation dimension on a percentage basis, that is, the evaluation standard is to quantitatively score each evaluation dimension, and the scoring range is 0 to 100 points. The weight value of each evaluation dimension is any value between 0 and 1, and the weight value can be determined and adjusted through historical data analysis or domain expert experience. The sum of the weight values ​​of all evaluation dimensions is 1. The task assignment unit 202 is used to assign the evaluation task to the corresponding evaluator based on the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information and the evaluator information.

[0046] When creating an evaluation task, you can select the evaluation equipment by selecting the line, then the station, and then the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment. You can also select it by entering the equipment number.

[0047] In one embodiment of the present invention, each evaluation dimension is respectively provided with a plurality of sub-indicators, and the sub-indicators of each evaluation dimension are also scored on a percentage basis. The sub-indicators of the equipment operation status include the equipment response speed, memory usage, whether there is an emergency mode, etc. The sub-indicators of the historical operation status include the number of historical failures, operating time, etc. The sub-indicators of the historical maintenance status include the number of repairs, maintenance frequency, etc. The sub-indicators of the spare parts and material status include whether there are spare parts for the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, whether the spare parts are discontinued, whether there are alternatives, as well as the total line commissioning volume, annual consumption, inventory volume, etc.

[0048] The score of an evaluation dimension is obtained by weighted summing the scores of all its sub-indicators. The weight value of each sub-indicator of an evaluation dimension is any value between 0 and 1, and the sum of the weight values ​​of all sub-indicators of an evaluation dimension is 1. The evaluation result is obtained by weighted summing the scores of all evaluation dimensions. The evaluation result is a value between 0 and 100. The evaluation result can be regarded as the parent item of each evaluation dimension. The evaluation dimension is the parent item of each of its sub-indicators, and the sub-indicators are the sub-items of the evaluation dimension, and each evaluation dimension is the sub-item of the evaluation result. In other words, the weight range of all sub-indicators is between (0-1), and the sum of the weights of all sub-items belonging to the same parent item is 1. The calculation rule starts from the lowest-level indicator item, and each item is calculated in percentage and multiplied by the corresponding weight and added to obtain the score of the parent item. This process is repeated to obtain the final evaluation result. Then, the sub-indicators of the evaluation dimension can also set their indicator sub-items to expand the calculation level.

[0049] In actual engineering applications, in addition to the aforementioned evaluation dimensions and sub-indicators, further dimensions and sub-indicators can be set. For example, the management system compliance dimension refers to whether the management system of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment complies with relevant laws, regulations, standards, and policy requirements, as well as the implementation of its emergency management plan. In the historical maintenance dimension, sub-indicators can also include the work status and specifications of maintenance personnel; in the spare parts and supplies dimension, sub-indicators can also include whether spare parts and supplies are stored in designated locations. In other words, evaluation dimensions and their sub-indicators can be set and adjusted based on actual conditions.

[0050] In one embodiment of the present invention, to reduce the complexity of the authority configuration module 300, the assessment personnel are divided into assessment management personnel and assessment professionals responsible for data collection of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment. The assessment management personnel are further divided into super administrators and professional administrators. The super administrator has the greatest authority and can configure and modify the information data of all modules of the assessment system. The professional administrator can, with the authorization of the super administrator, manage the modification of certain data, such as by route or station, and be responsible for the review of some assessment results / assessment reports. The assessment professional can only modify the data of the data collection module 400 by accepting the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment.

[0051] The following describes in detail the weight relationship between the evaluation results and the evaluation dimensions and their sub-indicators through a specific embodiment. It is assumed that there are five evaluation dimensions, namely, management system compliance, equipment operation status, historical operation status, historical maintenance status, and spare parts and materials status.

[0052] Evaluate the management system compliance dimension: The management system compliance is divided into two sub-indicators: enterprise standard compliance and emergency management compliance. Enterprise standard compliance has four sub-indicators: A1 requires the input of the number of standards that should be in place and the actual number of standards, and points will be deducted based on the missing proportion; A2 technical demonstration, A3 implementation, and A4 review status are all full marks if all three are present, and zero marks if none are present. Including this item, all full marks mentioned below are defaulted to 100 points; Enterprise standard compliance score A is based on the formula Perform comprehensive evaluation, where α i A i The weight corresponding to the item and Including this item, all the indicator weights expressed in algebra mentioned below are determined by the indicator weights pre-selected by the assessment manager, and the sum of all indicator weights appearing in the same equation is equal to 1. Similarly, the implementation of the emergency management system and plan drills has two indicator sub-items: B1 requires the input of the number of plans that should be in place and the number of actual plans, and points are deducted based on the missing proportion; B2 implementation report is full score if there is one, and zero score if there is none; the emergency management compliance score B is based on the formula Perform comprehensive evaluation, where βi B i The weight corresponding to the item. The management system compliance dimension score should be comprehensively evaluated according to the formula Y1 = α*A + β*B to obtain the final evaluation result of the management quality system compliance, where α and β are the weight values ​​corresponding to each sub-indicator item.

[0053] Evaluate the historical operation status dimension: The historical operation status dimension can be divided into four types of electromechanical equipment: A station computer, B automatic ticket gate, C automatic ticket vending machine, D semi-automatic ticket vending machine, and each device is scored individually on a percentage basis. The station computer includes two sub-indicators: the number of failures A1, with a full score of 100 points, and 5 points will be deducted for each failure until all points are deducted, but not less than 0 points; the service life A2, 0-4 years = 100 points, 5-8 years = 80 points, 9-12 years = 60 points, 12-15 years = 40 points, and more than 15 years = 20 points. Station computer score Y 2A According to formula Y 2A =α*A1+β*A2 for comprehensive evaluation, where α and β are predefined weights corresponding to the number of failures and years of use, common to all four types of equipment. Similarly, the automatic ticket gate includes two sub-indicators: failure rate per 10,000 passes (B1), with <5% = 100 points, 5%-10% = 80 points, 10%-15% = 60 points, 15%-20% = 40 points, and >20% = 20 points; the scoring rules for years of use (B2) are the same as A2; the automatic ticket gate score (Y) 2B According to formula Y 2B =α*B1+β*B2 for comprehensive evaluation. Automatic ticket vending machines and semi-automatic ticket vending machines have the same two sub-indicators: failure rate C1 and D1, <1% = 100 points, 1%-3% = 80 points, 3%-6% = 60 points, 6%-10% = 40 points, >10% = 20 points; the evaluation rules for service life C2 and D2 are the same as A2; the evaluation rules for automatic ticket vending machines and semi-automatic ticket vending machines are Y 2C 、Y 2D According to formula Y 2C =α*C1+β*C2, Y 2D =α*D1+β*D2 for comprehensive evaluation.

[0054] Evaluate the historical maintenance situation dimension: The historical maintenance situation dimension is divided into three sub-indicators, namely the implementation of maintenance, inspection, and maintenance rules and regulations, maintenance, maintenance plans, and operating personnel. Among them, the implementation of maintenance, inspection, and maintenance rules and regulations has a total of six indicator sub-items: A1 daily inspection, A2 biweekly inspection, A3 monthly inspection, A4 quarterly inspection, A5 semi-annual inspection, and A6 annual inspection. In an assessment, these six indicator sub-items are not necessarily all enabled. For enabled sub-items, full marks will be awarded if enabled, and zero marks if not. Unenabled sub-items will not participate in this assessment. The score A for the implementation of maintenance, inspection, and maintenance rules and regulations should be based on the formula A comprehensive evaluation is conducted, where k is the set of specific subscripts of enabled indicator sub-items, and n is the number of enabled indicator sub-items. Maintenance and repair plans have only one indicator item B, which is scored based on whether there is a maintenance plan table during on-site inspection. If there is, the full score is given, and if there is no, the score is zero. There are three indicator sub-items for operators: C1, whether the person in charge of maintenance tools is clear, C2, whether the maintenance and repair personnel hold an operation certificate, and C3, whether labor protection supplies are issued and used. If all three items are present, the full score is given, and if there is no, the score is zero. According to the formula The average score of the three sub-items is calculated for a comprehensive evaluation, resulting in the operator evaluation result. The historical maintenance situation is comprehensively evaluated using the formula Y3 = α*A + β*B + γ*C to obtain the final historical maintenance situation evaluation result, where α, β, and γ are the weights corresponding to the sub-items.

[0055] Evaluate the spare parts situation: The spare parts situation has two sub-indicators: spare parts guarantee assessment and spare parts management assessment. The spare parts guarantee assessment is based on four types of electromechanical equipment: A station computer, B automatic ticket gate, C automatic ticket vending machine, D semi-automatic ticket vending machine, and each equipment is scored on a 100-point scale. For each equipment X, there are several parts x1...x n , each component has two evaluation indicators: x i1 Whether to stop production and x i2 Is there a substitute? i1 If it is not, then the component x i The score is full; if x i1 is and x i2 If it is not, then the component x i The score is zero; if x i1 is and x i2 If yes, then the component x i The score is full. The spare parts guarantee assessment for each equipment X is based on the formula Perform comprehensive evaluation, where μ i is x i The weight corresponding to the item. Spare parts management assessment has two indicator sub-items: M1 spare parts storage location requires input of spare parts storage location and upload of pictures to prove it, full marks if it exists, zero marks if it does not; M2 whether spare parts are in stock, full marks if it exists, zero marks otherwise. Spare parts management assessment result M is based on the formula For each equipment, the spare parts material situation dimension is based on the formula Y 4X =α*X+β*M to conduct a comprehensive assessment and obtain the final assessment result Y of the spare parts and materials situation of the four types of equipment. 4A 、Y 4B 、Y 4C 、Y 4D, where α and β are the weight values ​​corresponding to each indicator item.

[0056] Equipment operation status is evaluated: Equipment operation status is divided into two sub-indicators: equipment performance and equipment function. Both sub-indicators are based on four types of electromechanical equipment: A station computer, B automatic ticket gate, C automatic ticket vending machine, D semi-automatic ticket vending machine. Each device is evaluated individually on a percentage basis. At the same time, for all stations S1...S n There may be more than one device of the same type that needs to be evaluated. i Multiple devices of the same type X i1 ...X in , each device X ik There are several performance test projects XP ik1 ...XP ikn With several functional test items XF ik1 ...XF ikn For each specific performance test project XP ikq There is a corresponding judgment condition ω q , when this particular condition ω q When satisfied, for example, in one embodiment, XP ikq A station computer A for a specific station S1 12 The available space on the server disk, i.e. AP 123 , when the available space is greater than 10%, ω3=100 points, otherwise ω3=0 points, then if the station computer A 12 When the server disk free space is greater than 10%, AP 123 =Full score, otherwise zero score. Similarly, for each specific functional test item XF ik1 , which has only two states, full score if the function is normal, otherwise zero score. ik The score of the equipment operation dimension is based on the formula Conduct a comprehensive evaluation, where p q 、f q is the weight value corresponding to each item.

[0057] The evaluation result of a device is the value obtained by weighted summation of the above five dimensions.

[0058] When evaluating the status of the overall automatic ticket vending and checking equipment at each station or line, a weighted sum can be performed again on each equipment on the line or station. Taking the station computer as an example: In one embodiment, for a specific track line L, the status of each station computer A is first calculated. ik The equipment operation status score is then grouped by station, and each station S iThe score is based on the formula The average score of all station computers under the station is used as the evaluation result of the equipment operation status of the station computer at each station. Finally, the formula should be used The average score of all stations under the line is used as the evaluation result of the equipment operation status dimension of the station computer of this line. Similarly, the same calculation can be done for the other three types of equipment to obtain the evaluation result Y of the equipment operation status of the four types of equipment on this line. 5A 、Y 5B 、Y 5C 、Y 5D The total score of the evaluation results of the line can be divided into four types of electromechanical equipment: A station computer, B automatic ticket gate, C automatic ticket vending machine, D semi-automatic ticket vending machine. After each equipment is evaluated separately on a percentage basis, for each equipment X, the total score of the line is Y. X =y1*Y1+y2*Y 2X +y3*Y3+y4*Y 4X +y5*Y 5X Conduct a comprehensive evaluation, where y1, y2, y3, y4, and y5 are the weight values ​​corresponding to each indicator item.

[0059] In one embodiment of the present invention, a plurality of evaluation levels are set according to the numerical value of the evaluation result, and each evaluation level corresponds to a different subsequent operation and maintenance strategy for the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment to guide the processing and operation requirements for the equipment after the evaluation is completed. In one embodiment, when the evaluation result score is [100-90), the evaluation level is A, and the equipment is used normally; when the evaluation result score is [90-70), the evaluation level is B, and the equipment is used under normal maintenance conditions; when the evaluation result score is [70-60), the evaluation level is C, and the equipment needs to carry out key maintenance or special repairs; when the evaluation result score is [60-0], the evaluation level is D, and the equipment needs to be retired and updated. The frequency or items of normal maintenance or key maintenance can be specifically set according to actual conditions such as maintenance resources.

[0060] The present invention also proposes a rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment state fusion evaluation method, which is applied to the rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment state fusion evaluation system as described above, see Figure 2 , including the following steps:

[0061] Step S1: The assessment manager configures basic data related to the assessment task through the assessment system interface, such as basic information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment.

[0062] Step S2: Create and assign assessment tasks to assessors based on AFC equipment information. The specific content of the assessment tasks is configured based on actual needs. Generally, assessment tasks include the equipment being assessed and its corresponding assessment dimensions, assessment criteria, weights for each dimension, and an assessment period. Assessment dimensions include equipment operating status, historical operating status, historical maintenance status, and availability of spare parts and supplies. The assessment criteria provide a percentage score for each dimension. Each dimension has a weight value between 0 and 1, and the sum of all dimension weights is 1.

[0063] Step S3: Configure the evaluator's work permissions based on the evaluator's information and the evaluation tasks assigned to them.

[0064] Step S4: The assessment professionals collect the status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment by connecting sensor devices, communication equipment or on-site acceptance, and fill in the information in the assessment system.

[0065] Step S5: After the evaluator completes the report in the evaluation system, the system automatically performs an equipment status assessment. Based on the collected status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the AFC equipment, and according to preset evaluation criteria, the system evaluates the status of the AFC equipment and generates an evaluation result and / or subsequent operation and maintenance strategy. The evaluation result is a weighted sum of the scores of all evaluation dimensions and is a numerical value between 0 and 100. Multiple evaluation levels are set based on the evaluation result value, each corresponding to a different subsequent operation and maintenance strategy for the AFC equipment, guiding the handling and operation requirements for the equipment after the evaluation is completed.

[0066] Step S6: The assessment manager is finally responsible for reviewing and confirming the assessment results, verifying the accuracy and validity of the assessment results based on the assessment results and actual data, and completing the assessment task.

[0067] The assessment is carried out by assessment managers and assessment professionals. For the process, see Figure 3 , specifically including:

[0068] 1) The assessment manager configures basic data for the assessment task:

[0069] Configure the rail transit automatic ticket vending and checking equipment that needs to be evaluated;

[0070] Configure data related to the assessment task, including assessment dimensions, sub-indicators of the assessment dimensions, weights corresponding to each indicator, scoring criteria for each indicator, and grading criteria corresponding to the assessment results;

[0071] Configure evaluators to subsequently assign evaluation tasks. The super administrator can additionally configure professional administrators to subsequently review evaluation results and reports.

[0072] 2) Assess the management personnel configuration and issue assessment tasks:

[0073] Enter a name for the assessment task;

[0074] Select the evaluation device;

[0075] Determine the deadline for the assessment;

[0076] Select the evaluators responsible for this assessment task;

[0077] Release the assessment task.

[0078] 3) The assessment professionals accept and complete the assessment task and submit the assessment results:

[0079] Assessment professionals accept assessment assignments;

[0080] Go to the site to collect the required data;

[0081] Complete data filling in the system;

[0082] Once the assessor confirms the assessment is complete, the system automatically generates a draft report based on the calculated scores and sends it to the assessment administrator. The assessor can download and review the draft report to identify any issues, but cannot modify the assessment data.

[0083] 4) The assessment manager reviews the assessment results and assessment report and completes the assessment task:

[0084] The assessment manager reviews the draft report in the system. If the manager believes there are still issues with the draft report, they can authorize the assessment professional to re-enter the assessment data and resubmit the draft report. If the assessment manager believes there are no issues with the draft report, the assessment task is completed in the system and the final assessment report is submitted. The assessment manager can then download and review the final assessment report.

[0085] After completing the draft assessment, if the assessment professional still finds any issues with the draft assessment report, they can submit a revision request to the assessment manager in the system. After the assessment manager reviews the request and agrees to the revision, the assessment professional can restart the assessment data and submit the draft report. If the assessment manager disagrees with the revision request, the assessment manager will directly review the request.

[0086] It should be noted that, in this application, unless otherwise clearly specified and limited, "connection" and similar terms should be understood in a broad sense. For example, "connection" can be a fixed connection, a detachable connection, or an integral connection; it can be a mechanical connection or an electrical connection; it can be a direct connection, an indirect connection through an intermediate medium, or a connection between two components. Technicians in the field can understand the specific meaning of the above terms in this application according to the specific circumstances.

[0087] The present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0088] 1) The present invention can integrate and analyze the status data of all automatic ticket vending and checking equipment in the entire line network, realize comprehensive monitoring of the equipment operation status, avoid equipment failure delays or frequent maintenance caused by untimely manual inspections, provide a scientific basis for the allocation of operation and maintenance resources, significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of equipment management, contribute to the accurate evaluation and efficient management of rail transit equipment, improve the quality and management level of equipment operation and maintenance, and enhance the digitalization and intelligence level of rail transit.

[0089] 2) This invention establishes a unified, scientific, and objective set of equipment status assessment standards. By quantifying and scoring multiple dimensions of automated ticket vending and checking equipment and combining them with weights to calculate comprehensive assessment results, it avoids the subjectivity and arbitrariness of manual assessments, making the assessment results more objective and reliable. Furthermore, the weights of each assessment dimension can be adjusted, increasing the flexibility of the assessment.

[0090] 3) The present invention can effectively reduce the equipment failure rate through timely equipment status monitoring and maintenance, ensure the normal operation of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, avoid problems such as passenger queuing and detention due to equipment failure, and thus improve passengers' travel experience and satisfaction.

[0091] Although the above methods are illustrated and described as a series of acts for simplicity of explanation, it is to be understood and appreciated that these methods are not limited by the order of the acts, as some acts may occur in a different order and / or concurrently with other acts from those illustrated and described herein or not illustrated and described herein but understandable to those skilled in the art according to one or more embodiments.

[0092] The construction and arrangement of the present application shown in a number of different exemplary embodiments are merely illustrative. Although only a few embodiments are described in detail in this disclosure, it should be readily understood by those who refer to this disclosure that many modifications are possible (such as parameter values, etc.) without departing substantially from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described in this application. For example, an element shown as integrally formed may be composed of multiple parts or elements, the position of the element may be inverted or otherwise changed, and the nature, number, or position of the discrete elements may be altered or changed. Therefore, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be changed or reordered according to alternative embodiments. In the claims, any "means plus function" clause is intended to cover the structures described herein that perform the functions described, and is not only structurally equivalent but also equivalent structures. Without departing from the spirit and essence of the present invention, those skilled in the art may make various corresponding modifications and variations according to the present invention, but these corresponding modifications and variations should all fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system, characterized by: include: A data storage module for storing automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information and assessment personnel information, wherein the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information includes station and line information, and the assessment personnel information includes department and position information; The assessment management module creates and assigns assessment tasks to assessors based on the information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment; The authority configuration module configures the evaluator's work authority based on the evaluator's information and the assigned evaluation tasks; Data collection module, which collects status information and historical operation and maintenance information of automatic ticket vending and checking equipment; The status assessment module assesses the status of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment based on the collected status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment and based on preset assessment criteria, and generates assessment results and / or subsequent operation and maintenance strategies.

2. The rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information also includes the equipment number, equipment name, and equipment model, and the evaluator information also includes contact information.

3. The rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The assessment management module includes a task setting unit and a task allocation unit; The task setting unit is used to create an evaluation task, wherein the evaluation task includes the evaluation equipment and its corresponding evaluation dimensions, evaluation criteria, weights of each evaluation dimension, and evaluation period. The evaluation dimensions include equipment operation status, historical operation status, and historical maintenance status. The evaluation criteria are the basis for scoring each evaluation dimension on a percentage basis. The weight value of each evaluation dimension is any value between 0 and 1, and the sum of the weight values ​​of all evaluation dimensions is 1. The task allocation unit is used to allocate the evaluation task to the corresponding evaluation personnel according to the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment information and the evaluation personnel information.

4. The rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system according to claim 3 is characterized in that: It also includes a task progress monitoring module, which is used to monitor the progress of the evaluation task and remind the evaluator when the evaluation task is not completed on time according to the set evaluation cycle.

5. The rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system according to claim 3 is characterized in that: Each evaluation dimension is set with multiple sub-indicators, and each sub-indicator of the evaluation dimension is also scored on a percentage basis; Sub-indicators of device operation status include device response speed, memory usage, and whether there is an emergency mode; Sub-indicators of historical operation status include the number of historical failures and operating time; Sub-indicators of historical maintenance status include the number of maintenance times and maintenance frequency.

6. The rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system according to claim 5 is characterized in that: The score of an evaluation dimension is obtained by weighted summing the scores of all its sub-indicators. The weight value of each sub-indicator of an evaluation dimension is any value between 0 and 1, and the sum of the weight values ​​of all sub-indicators of an evaluation dimension is 1.

7. The rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The evaluation dimensions also include spare parts and supplies; The data acquisition module also collects spare parts and material information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment; The sub-indicators of the spare parts material situation include whether there are spare parts for automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, whether the spare parts have been discontinued, and whether there are substitutes.

8. The rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment system according to claim 6 is characterized in that: The evaluation result is obtained by weighted summation of the scores of all evaluation dimensions. The evaluation result is a value between 0-100. Multiple evaluation levels are set according to the evaluation result value, and each evaluation level corresponds to a different subsequent operation and maintenance strategy for the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment.

9. A rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment method, characterized in that: The method is applied to the rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 8, comprising the following steps: Based on the information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, an assessment task is created and assigned to the assessor. The assessment task includes the assessment equipment and its corresponding assessment dimensions, assessment criteria, and weights of each assessment dimension. The assessment dimensions include the equipment's operating status, historical operating status, and historical maintenance status. The assessment criteria are the basis for scoring each assessment dimension on a percentage basis. The weight value of each assessment dimension is any value between 0 and 1, and the sum of the weight values ​​of all assessment dimensions is 1. Configure the evaluator's work permissions based on the evaluator's information and the evaluation tasks assigned to them; The assessors collected the status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment; Based on the collected status information and historical operation and maintenance information of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment, and based on preset evaluation criteria, the status of the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment is evaluated to generate evaluation results and / or subsequent operation and maintenance strategies. The evaluation result is obtained by weighted summation of the scores of all evaluation dimensions, and the evaluation result is a numerical value between 0-100.

10. The rail transit network automatic ticket vending and checking equipment status fusion assessment method according to claim 9 is characterized in that: Multiple evaluation levels are set according to the evaluation result values, and each evaluation level corresponds to a different subsequent operation and maintenance strategy for the automatic ticket vending and checking equipment.

Images