Whole vehicle design point inspection method and system

Abstract

The invention discloses a whole vehicle design point inspection method and system, and the method comprises the following steps: carrying out the entry of point inspection table content, defining a point inspection acceptance standard, carrying out the classification and association of point inspection items, and storing the point inspection items in a design point inspection template library according to the types; according to vehicle model development task requirements, point inspection items in corresponding categories are automatically matched and combined to form a point inspection template, and the point inspection template is distributed to design and approval personnel of related professions to execute point inspection work; and comparing the point inspection results of the designer and the approver in the same template, and storing the comparison result in a design point inspection result database. By means of the method, the situation of repeated work is effectively avoided, the possibility of spot inspection errors is reduced, spot inspection omission is avoided, false spot inspection results are prevented from being filled and reported, the spot inspection effect is improved, project type management of the spot inspection process is achieved, full-manual table operation is avoided, and the spot inspection efficiency is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of vehicle design and development, and in particular to a vehicle design inspection method and system. Background Art

[0002] After the detailed design plan of a commercial vehicle is completed and during the trial production of the vehicle, a comprehensive design inspection is required on the design plan, drawings, key characteristic parameters, announced parameters, design standard compliance, basic historical problems, etc., to ensure that known, low-level, and repetitive design quality problems are closed as much as possible in the early stages of vehicle development, avoiding the investment of exponential resources and costs in production, manufacturing and after-sales to rectify these problems.

[0003] During the vehicle design and development process, Excel spreadsheets are currently widely used in various professional fields to perform design inspection work, including management, recording, summary and tracking of design progress. The inspection results of the same items in different inspection spreadsheets cannot be verified with each other, and the project inspection progress can only be grasped through cross-departmental communication. There is duplication of work, resulting in low inspection efficiency. The inspection process relies entirely on manual operation of inspection spreadsheets, which is prone to inspection errors, omissions, and false inspection results. The accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the inspection results cannot be guaranteed, resulting in poor inspection results. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In response to the above-mentioned problems existing in current technology, this application provides a vehicle design inspection method and system to solve the technical problems that the current inspection method has duplication of work, low inspection efficiency, and the accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the inspection results cannot be guaranteed.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, in a first aspect, the present application provides a vehicle design inspection method, the method comprising:

[0006] Itemize the inspection form contents and define the inspection acceptance standards. After classifying and associating the inspection items, store them in the design inspection template library by category.

[0007] According to the vehicle development task requirements, the inspection items in the corresponding categories are automatically matched, combined to form an inspection template, and distributed to relevant professional design and approval personnel to perform inspection work.

[0008] Compare the inspection results of designers and reviewers in the same template, and store the comparison results in the design inspection result database.

[0009] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the itemized inspection sheet further includes: summarizing the inspection sheets of various professions and different types, and itemizing the contents of the inspection sheets.

[0010] Furthermore, in one embodiment, automatically matching inspection items in corresponding categories according to vehicle model development task requirements includes:

[0011] Identify the change points between the model to be developed and the basic model, mark the change points, and automatically match the inspection items in the corresponding category according to the change points and marks.

[0012] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the step of distributing the template to design and approval personnel of relevant professions for spot checking includes:

[0013] The inspection template is distributed to designers in various disciplines so that they can complete the inspection of all items in the corresponding discipline.

[0014] The inspection items of the same profession are randomly assigned to the same number of reviewers of the corresponding profession, so that each reviewer of the same profession can perform the inspection work of different items.

[0015] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the comparison results include pass and fail. If the inspection results are consistent or within the allowable error range, it is considered to have passed; otherwise, it is considered to have failed.

[0016] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the inspection items with failed comparison results are highlighted and summarized in a project-by-project manner, and are continuously suspended and tracked until the solution is optimized and approved.

[0017] In a second aspect, based on the above-mentioned vehicle design inspection method, the present application provides a vehicle design inspection system, the system comprising:

[0018] The setting module is used to itemize the inspection table content and define the inspection acceptance standards. After classifying and associating the inspection items, they are stored in the design inspection template library according to dimension categories.

[0019] The execution module is used to automatically match the corresponding inspection items according to the vehicle model development task requirements, combine them to form an inspection template, and distribute it to relevant professional design and approval personnel to perform the inspection work.

[0020] The comparison module compares the inspection results of designers and reviewers in the same template and stores the comparison results in the design inspection result database.

[0021] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the system further includes an input module for inputting vehicle model development task book configuration information before itemizing the inspection table contents and defining the inspection acceptance standards.

[0022] Furthermore, in one embodiment, it is characterized in that the system also includes a display module, which is used to display the inspection comparison results generated by the comparison module, highlight the inspection items with failed comparison results and summarize them in a project-based manner, and continue to suspend and track them until the plan is optimized and approved.

[0023] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the system further includes a visualization module, which is used to display inspection progress information reminders, and is also used to display inspection information and inspection status notifications.

[0024] The beneficial effects of the technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present application include:

[0025] The vehicle design inspection method provided by this application items the contents of the inspection table and defines the inspection acceptance standards. After the inspection items are classified and associated, they are stored in the design inspection template library by category, which effectively avoids duplication of work. According to the vehicle model development task requirements, the inspection items in the corresponding category are automatically matched, and the inspection templates are combined and distributed to the design and approval personnel of the relevant professions to perform the inspection work. The inspection results of the designers and the approval personnel in the same template are compared, and the comparison results are stored in the design inspection result database, which reduces the possibility of inspection errors, avoids omissions in inspections, prevents the filling of false inspection results, improves the inspection effect, realizes project-based management of the inspection process, avoids all manual operation of forms, and improves the inspection efficiency. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0026] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of the vehicle design inspection method according to an embodiment of the present application;

[0027] Figure 2 For this application Figure 1 Flowchart of step S2 in FIG.

[0028] Figure 3 A block diagram of the vehicle inspection system designed for an embodiment of the present application;

[0029] Figure 4 This is a detailed block diagram of a vehicle design inspection system according to another embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0030] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the present invention, the following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0031] In order to make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of this application clearer, the implementation methods of this application will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0032] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for design inspection of a whole vehicle.

[0033] In one embodiment, see Figure 1 As shown, the above method includes:

[0034] S1. Itemize the inspection table contents and define the inspection acceptance standards. After classifying and associating the inspection items, store them in the design inspection template library by category.

[0035] S2. Automatically match the inspection items in the corresponding categories according to the vehicle development task requirements, combine them to form an inspection template, and distribute it to the relevant professional design and approval personnel to perform the inspection work.

[0036] S3. Compare the inspection results of the designer and the reviewer in the same template, and store the comparison results in the design inspection result database.

[0037] It should be noted that during the vehicle design and development process, Excel spreadsheets are currently widely used in various professional fields to perform design inspections, including management, recording, summarizing, and tracking design progress. Inspection results for the same items in different inspection spreadsheets cannot be verified with each other, and the project inspection progress can only be grasped through cross-departmental communication. This leads to duplication of work and low inspection efficiency. The inspection process relies entirely on manual operation of inspection spreadsheets, which is prone to inspection errors, omissions, and false inspection results. The accuracy, completeness, and authenticity of the inspection results cannot be guaranteed, resulting in poor inspection results. The specific problems are as follows:

[0038] (1) Lack of effective management of the inspection process:

[0039] The process of designing inspection forms is scattered across different departments and sections, making it difficult to timely understand the overall progress of each professional inspection and thus understand the risks of vehicle design and development. If there are overdue items that have not been inspected, project managers or vehicle layout personnel need to frequently follow up, resulting in high communication costs.

[0040] Cross-departmental communication, manual confirmation, filling out, and summarization of forms take up a lot of employees' time, making data statistics and aggregation difficult and unable to support big data analysis.

[0041] Abnormal items that appear during the inspection process can only be tracked and closed by professionals themselves, and cannot be effectively viewed upward. Problem items that require a long period of time to solve are often missed.

[0042] (2) The design inspection process is cumbersome, inefficient and ineffective:

[0043] A considerable number of items are the same in the inspection list of the scheme formulation stage and the inspection list of the vehicle trial production stage, but the trial production node is often separated from the scheme formulation stage by a long time, and the inspection focus in different stages is different, so different inspection lists are used. As a result, the node results of the same items cannot be verified with each other, resulting in unnecessary duplication of work.

[0044] Because there are not only many types and items in the design inspection forms, the inspection work is huge, and the same designer often performs inspection work on multiple different design and development projects. In addition, some designers may not be proficient enough and have insufficient understanding of the design specifications and various inspection forms. Coupled with the pressure of the overall project development progress, the actual design inspection results often contain inspection errors, missing inspection items, arbitrary modification of inspection standards, and even false inspection results, which cannot effectively guarantee the accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the data.

[0045] When approval personnel conduct spot checks through irregular random inspections, there is a situation where they select spot check items based on their personal subjective wishes, resulting in duplication and omissions in the spot check work.

[0046] Printing forms, filling them out manually on site, reviewing and approving them, taking photos, and archiving them will cause additional work.

[0047] The embodiment of the present application itemizes the contents of the inspection table and defines the inspection acceptance standards. After the inspection items are classified and associated, they are stored in the design inspection template library by category, effectively avoiding duplication of work. According to the vehicle model development task requirements, the inspection items in the corresponding category are automatically matched, combined to form an inspection template, and distributed to the design and approval personnel of the relevant profession to perform the inspection work. The inspection results of the designers and approval personnel in the same template are compared, and the comparison results are stored in the design inspection result database, which reduces the possibility of inspection errors, avoids omissions in inspections, prevents the filling of false inspection results, improves the inspection effect, realizes project-based management of the inspection process, avoids all manual operation of forms, and improves inspection efficiency.

[0048] In this embodiment, a design inspection template library is first established for each discipline in the design and development team based on the main characteristics of the key assembly configuration of the whole vehicle, the product usage area, the design discipline, and the type of inspection form, so as to realize the standardization and platform management of design inspection from the source; secondly, for the inspection work of the newly developed vehicle models, the inspection content can be distributed by writing a random function algorithm and a double-blind verification algorithm, and the inspection work can be carried out according to the inspection standards in the inspection template library, which not only effectively improves the inspection efficiency, but also avoids inspection errors, omissions, arbitrary modification of inspection standards, false inspections, etc.; finally, the B / S (browser / server) architecture, C# programming language, NetCore development framework, Blazor front-end framework and Alibaba Cloud technical solutions can be adopted, and mobile APP and PC (Personal Computer) terminals can be developed simultaneously to visualize and manage the design inspection work in a project-based manner.

[0049] Furthermore, in one embodiment, itemizing the inspection table contents and defining the inspection acceptance criteria in step S1 above include:

[0050] S101. Summarize the inspection forms of various professions and types, and itemize the contents of the inspection forms.

[0051] S102. Define acceptance criteria for each inspection item.

[0052] The aforementioned disciplines can be categorized by project as general layout, body system, electrical system, suspension system, braking system, powertrain system, transmission system, cooling system, intake and exhaust system, and fuel system. These various inspection forms can be grouped into two phases: the program development phase and the vehicle trial production phase. The program development phase includes: configuration input compliance inspection forms, key characteristic parameter achievement inspection forms, public parameter inspection forms, design standard compliance inspection forms, safety and disaster prevention inspection forms, historical issue recurrence prevention inspection forms, process inspection forms, and three-dimensional digital model (DMU) inspection forms. The vehicle trial production phase includes: safety and disaster prevention inspection forms, historical issue recurrence prevention inspection forms, process inspection forms, public parameter consistency inspection forms, actual vehicle function inspection forms, and VES review issue closure validity inspection forms.

[0053] In this embodiment, a unified inspection and acceptance standard is defined for each inspection item, which to a certain extent avoids the situation where the inspection standard is modified arbitrarily and reduces the problem of inconsistent inspection results caused by subjective factors.

[0054] Furthermore, in one embodiment, after the spot check items are classified and associated in the above step S1, they are stored in the design spot check template library by category, including:

[0055] Inspection items are classified and associated according to the main features of key assembly configurations (such as engine brand, horsepower, etc.), product lines (such as special-purpose vehicles, tractors, dump trucks, etc.), usage areas (cold areas, mountainous areas, etc.), design majors, and types of inspection forms (such as announced parameter inspection, process inspection, etc.), and stored in the design inspection template library by category.

[0056] This embodiment classifies and associates inspection items, avoiding the problem that node results of the same item cannot verify each other, and stores the inspection items in the design inspection template library by category, which facilitates efficient loading and reuse in subsequent different development projects.

[0057] Further, in one embodiment, see Figure 2 As shown, the above step S2 specifically includes:

[0058] S201. Input vehicle model development task book configuration information, including vehicle model configuration information, including the main features of key assembly configurations, product lines, usage areas, types of inspection sheets, etc.

[0059] S202: Identify and mark the change points, identify the change points between the model to be developed and the basic model, and mark the change points.

[0060] S203: Match the inspection items and combine them to form an inspection template. Automatically match the inspection items of the corresponding categories in the inspection template library according to the above-mentioned change points and identifiers to form an inspection template. Then, proceed to S204 and S205 respectively.

[0061] S204: Distribute the inspection template to the professional designers for inspection. The inspection template is distributed to the professional designers so that the designers can complete the inspection of all items in the corresponding profession.

[0062] S205. Distribute the inspection items to the professional reviewers for inspection. Randomly distribute the inspection items of the same profession to the same number of reviewers of the corresponding profession, so that each reviewer of the same profession can perform the inspection work of different items.

[0063] In the above steps, S204 and S205 can be performed simultaneously or sequentially without affecting the implementation effect of the method.

[0064] Furthermore, in one embodiment, a random function algorithm may be used to implement the random assignment of the inspection items of the same profession to the same number of reviewers of the corresponding profession as the number of the inspection items in step A205 .

[0065] Specifically, while the designers are performing spot checks, a predefined random function algorithm is used to randomly assign spot checks of the same profession to different corresponding professional reviewers based on the total number of current spot checks and the number of reviewers, and the reviewers then perform the spot checks.

[0066] Based on this embodiment, by randomly assigning spot check items to different reviewers, it can be ensured that each reviewer does not review the same spot check item repeatedly, thus avoiding duplication and omission problems in spot checks to a certain extent.

[0067] Furthermore, in one embodiment, in step S3, for the same template, the inspection results of the designers and reviewers of the same discipline are compared, and the comparison results are stored in the design inspection result database. For example, for template 1, the inspection results of the designer of discipline 1 and the reviewer of discipline 1 are compared, and the inspection results of the designer of discipline 2 and the reviewer of discipline 2 are compared.

[0068] In one embodiment, a double-blind verification algorithm may be used to implement the comparison of the inspection results of the designer and the reviewer in the same template in step S3.

[0069] Specifically, during the entire inspection process, a predefined double-blind verification algorithm is used to enable the designer and the reviewer to conduct back-to-back inspections, and the inspection results are compared to obtain a comparison result.

[0070] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the comparison results in the above step S3 include pass and fail. If the inspection results are consistent or within the allowable error range, it is considered to be passed; otherwise, it is considered to be failed.

[0071] Based on this embodiment, inspection items that fail the comparison are highlighted and summarized as items, and then continuously suspended and tracked until the plan is optimized and approved. This improves inspection efficiency and effectively avoids inspection errors, omissions of inspection items, and false inspection results to a certain extent.

[0072] To sum up, the technical solution of the embodiment of the present application provides a vehicle design inspection method to address the problems of low inspection efficiency and poor inspection effect in the current vehicle design inspection process; after testing, it can reduce the interface of design inspection personnel (full-time / part-time) by more than 50%; the inspection efficiency is improved by more than 60%; the inspection accuracy is improved to 100%; the management and control process is visualized and efficiently retrieved; the process is the result, and it efficiently supports quality reports, reports and other materials; the interface is friendly, and it efficiently supports project management and big data analysis, and effectively forms a technology center-level design inspection database.

[0073] Specifically, the fully manual design inspection mode based on Excel of each system is optimized, and predefined random function algorithms and double-blind verification algorithms are used to enable designers and reviewers to conduct inspections back-to-back, greatly improving the efficiency and accuracy of development. Unified design inspection templates, support for project-based management, and SMS reminders have effectively strengthened the work collaboration of various departments, significantly reducing the communication and follow-up through communication tools such as email, WeChat, QQ, Feishu, and SMS; support for report management and big data analysis for easy traceability and query; development of concise and friendly mobile APP and PC-side visual interfaces to facilitate technical personnel to carry out design inspections anytime, anywhere, support SMS reminders (for overdue, approval, follow-up, etc.), which are convenient for later viewing, summarization, tracking, big data analysis, etc., and the progress of current inspection work can also be checked at any time.

[0074] In a second aspect, based on the above-mentioned embodiment of the whole vehicle design inspection method, the present application provides an embodiment of a whole vehicle design inspection system.

[0075] See also Figure 3 As shown, the above system includes a setting module, an execution module and a comparison system module, wherein:

[0076] The setting module is used to itemize the inspection table content and define the inspection acceptance standards. After classifying and associating the inspection items, they are stored in the design inspection template library according to dimension categories.

[0077] By defining unified inspection acceptance standards for each inspection item as mentioned above, the situation of arbitrary modification of inspection standards is avoided to a certain extent, and the problem of inconsistent inspection results due to subjective factors is reduced; by classifying and associating inspection items as mentioned above, the problem of node results of the same item not being able to verify each other is avoided, and the inspection items are stored in the design inspection template library by category, which is convenient for efficient loading and reuse in subsequent different development projects.

[0078] The execution module is used to automatically match the corresponding inspection items according to the vehicle model development task requirements, combine them to form an inspection template, and distribute it to relevant professional design and approval personnel to perform the inspection work.

[0079] By randomly assigning the inspection items to different reviewers as described above, it can be ensured that each reviewer does not review the same inspection item repeatedly, thus avoiding duplication and omission problems in spot checks to a certain extent.

[0080] The comparison module compares the inspection results of designers and reviewers in the same template and stores the comparison results in the design inspection result database.

[0081] The comparison results include pass and fail. If the inspection results are consistent or within the allowable error range, it is considered passed; otherwise, it is considered failed.

[0082] The embodiment of the present application itemizes the contents of the inspection table and defines the inspection acceptance standards. After the inspection items are classified and associated, they are stored in the design inspection template library by category, effectively avoiding duplication of work. According to the vehicle model development task requirements, the inspection items in the corresponding category are automatically matched, combined to form an inspection template, and distributed to the design and approval personnel of the relevant profession to perform the inspection work. The inspection results of the designers and approval personnel in the same template are compared, and the comparison results are stored in the design inspection result database, which reduces the possibility of inspection errors, avoids omissions in inspections, prevents the filling of false inspection results, improves the inspection effect, realizes project-based management of the inspection process, avoids all manual operation of forms, and improves inspection efficiency.

[0083] Further, in one embodiment, see Figure 4 The above system may further include an input module, a display module and a visualization module, specifically:

[0084] The input module is used to enter the vehicle model development task book configuration information before itemizing the inspection table content and defining the inspection acceptance standards.

[0085] The display module is used to display the inspection comparison results generated by the comparison module, highlight the inspection items with failed comparison results and summarize them in project form, and continue to suspend and track them until the plan is optimized and approved.

[0086] Inspection items that fail the comparison are highlighted and summarized as items, with continued suspension and tracking until the plan is optimized and approved. This improves inspection efficiency and effectively avoids inspection errors, omissions of inspection items, and false inspection results.

[0087] The visualization module is used to display inspection progress information reminders, and is also used to display inspection information and inspection status notifications.

[0088] The above-mentioned visualization module allows technical personnel to carry out design inspection work anytime and anywhere, supports SMS reminders (for overdue, approval, follow-up, etc.), facilitates later review, summary, tracking, big data analysis, etc., and can also check the progress of current inspection work at any time.

[0089] The visualization module corresponding to this embodiment can adopt B / S architecture, C# programming language, NetCore development framework, Blazor front-end framework and Alibaba Cloud technical solutions, and simultaneously develop mobile APP and PC interface, create core functional modules such as standard management, report management, inspection progress management, design team management, and result display management, so that technical personnel can carry out design inspection work anytime and anywhere, support SMS reminders (overdue, approval, follow-up and other information reminders), facilitate later viewing, summary, tracking, big data analysis, etc., and can also check the progress of current inspection work at any time.

[0090] Based on the above system implementation examples, project-based management of the inspection process is implemented, report management and big data analysis are supported, and the inspection process is visualized through a simple and user-friendly interface, thereby improving inspection efficiency.

[0091] It should be noted that the serial numbers of the above-mentioned embodiments of the present application are for description only and do not represent the advantages or disadvantages of the embodiments.

[0092] The terms "including" and "having" and any variations thereof in the specification and claims of this application and the above-mentioned drawings are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, system, product or device that includes a series of steps or units is not limited to the listed steps or units, but optionally includes steps or units that are not listed, or optionally includes other steps or units inherent to these processes, methods, products or devices. The terms "first", "second" and "third" are used to distinguish different objects, etc., and do not represent a sequence, nor do they limit the "first", "second" and "third" to different types.

[0093] In the description of the embodiments of this application, the words "exemplary," "for example," or "for example" are used to indicate examples, illustrations, or descriptions. Any embodiment or design described as "exemplary," "for example," or "for example" in the embodiments of this application should not be construed as being preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs. Rather, the use of words such as "exemplary," "for example," or "for example" is intended to present the relevant concepts in a concrete manner.

[0094] In the description of the embodiments of the present application, unless otherwise specified, “ / ” means or, for example, A / B can mean A or B; “and / or” in the text is merely a description of the association relationship of associated objects, indicating that three relationships may exist, for example, A and / or B can mean: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. In addition, in the description of the embodiments of the present application, “multiple” refers to two or more than two.

[0095] In some processes described in the embodiments of the present application, multiple operations or steps are included that appear in a specific order. However, it should be understood that these operations or steps may not be performed in the order in which they appear in the embodiments of the present application or may be performed in parallel. The sequence numbers of the operations are only used to distinguish between different operations, and the sequence numbers themselves do not represent any order of execution. In addition, these processes may include more or fewer operations, and these operations or steps may be performed in sequence or in parallel, and these operations or steps may be combined.

[0096] Through the description of the above implementation methods, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be implemented by means of software plus the necessary general hardware platform, of course, it can also be implemented by hardware, but in many cases the former is a better implementation method. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present application, or the part that contributes to the prior art, can be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium (such as ROM / RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk) as described above, and includes a number of instructions for enabling a terminal device to execute the methods described in each embodiment of the present application.

[0097] The above are only preferred embodiments of the present application and do not limit the patent scope of the present application. Any equivalent structure or equivalent process transformation made using the contents of the present application specification and drawings, or directly or indirectly applied in other related technical fields, are also included in the patent protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A vehicle design inspection method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Itemize the inspection form contents and define the inspection acceptance standards. After classifying and associating the inspection items, store them in the design inspection template library by category. According to the vehicle development task requirements, the system automatically matches the inspection items in the corresponding categories, combines them into an inspection template, and distributes it to the relevant professional designers and reviewers to perform the inspection work; Compare the inspection results of designers and reviewers in the same template, and store the comparison results in the design inspection result database.

2. The vehicle design inspection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The itemized inspection sheet also includes: summarizing the inspection sheets of various professions and different types, and itemizing the contents of the inspection sheets.

3. The vehicle design inspection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The automatic matching of inspection items in the corresponding category based on the vehicle development task requirements includes: Identify the change points between the model to be developed and the basic model, mark the change points, and automatically match the inspection items in the corresponding category according to the change points and marks.

4. The vehicle design inspection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The templates are distributed to the design and approval personnel of relevant disciplines to carry out spot checks, including: Distribute the inspection template to designers in various disciplines so that they can complete the inspection of all items in their corresponding disciplines; The inspection items of the same profession are randomly assigned to the same number of reviewers of the corresponding profession, so that each reviewer of the same profession can perform the inspection work of different items.

5. The vehicle design inspection method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The comparison results include pass and fail. If the inspection results are consistent or within the allowable error range, it is considered passed; otherwise, it is considered failed.

6. The vehicle design inspection method according to claim 5, characterized in that: Inspection items with failed comparison results will be highlighted and summarized in project form, and will be suspended and tracked continuously until the plan is optimized and approved.

7. A vehicle design inspection system, characterized in that: The system comprises: The setup module is used to itemize the inspection table content and define the inspection acceptance standards. After classifying and associating the inspection items, they are stored in the design inspection template library according to dimension categories. The execution module is used to automatically match the corresponding inspection items according to the vehicle model development task requirements, combine them to form an inspection template, and distribute it to the relevant professional design and approval personnel to perform the inspection work; The comparison module compares the inspection results of designers and reviewers in the same template and stores the comparison results in the design inspection result database.

8. The vehicle design inspection system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The system further comprises an input module for inputting vehicle model development task book configuration information before itemizing the inspection table contents and defining the inspection acceptance standards.

9. The vehicle design inspection system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The system further includes a display module for displaying the spot inspection comparison results generated by the comparison module, highlighting the spot inspection items with failed comparison results and summarizing them in a project-based manner, and continuously suspending and tracking them until the solution is optimized and approved.

10. The vehicle design inspection system according to claim 7, characterized in that: The system further comprises a visualization module, which is used to display inspection progress information reminders, and is also used to display inspection information and inspection status notifications.

Images