High-risk ship safety self-check questionnaire generation method and device, equipment and storage medium

Abstract

The application provides a high-risk ship safety self-check questionnaire generation method, device and equipment and a storage medium, relates to the technical field of high-risk ship detection, and comprises the following steps: selecting a target ship detection investigation question bank based on a high-risk ship type; dividing the target ship detection investigation question bank into a core investigation question set and a polling investigation question set; selecting at least part from each polling investigation question set in the at least one polling investigation; and generating the ship detection investigation questionnaire. Through the setting of the core question bank and the polling question bank, the core investigation question set is answered in each self-check process, and the polling period is set for the polling question, so that the rationality of the self-check investigation is improved, the problems of low efficiency, non-outstanding focus and easy formality in the traditional self-check method are successfully solved, a more intelligent, efficient and scientific safety self-check tool is provided for the high-risk ship, and thus the essential safety level of the ship can be significantly improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the technical field of high-risk vessel inspection, and in particular to a method, apparatus, equipment, and storage medium for high-risk vessel inspection. Background Technology

[0002] According to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations, vessels carrying flammable and explosive dangerous goods, such as explosives, compressed gases, flammable liquids, or flammable solids, are defined as high-risk vessels. In order to conduct safety inspections of dangerous vessels, the IMO and the International Association of Classification Societies have developed regulations for high-risk vessels, and national regulatory agencies have also developed corresponding regulations to control high-risk vessels.

[0003] Currently, ship safety self-inspections generally rely on a fixed, standardized questionnaire or checklist. Crew members or managers check each item against this comprehensive checklist. However, this traditional self-inspection method has the following significant drawbacks:

[0004] Inefficient inspection: Traditional questionnaires typically contain hundreds of inspection items, covering all aspects of the ship. Each inspection requires a significant amount of time and effort to go through all the items, many of which are non-critical and stable in the short term, making repeated inspections unnecessary and resulting in a waste of human and time resources.

[0005] This leads to "inspection fatigue" and formalism: When crew members repeatedly face the same lengthy and unchanging questionnaires, they are prone to complacency and boredom, viewing self-inspection as merely a "check-off" task rather than a genuine effort to discover and solve problems. This "inspection fatigue" renders inspections a mere formality, significantly weakening their intended early warning function.

[0006] Lack of risk focus: In a large and comprehensive checklist, all inspection items are given the same weight in form. This makes it difficult for inspectors to focus their main efforts on the critical equipment and operations with the highest risk level that are relevant to the current operation, resulting in a dilution of the focus of safety management. The real high-risk points may be overlooked due to the dispersion of inspection efforts.

[0007] The inspection lacks systematic and scientific rigor: fixed inspection models fail to implement differentiated inspection strategies based on the risk levels and failure cycles of different equipment and systems. For example, the inspection frequency of certain critical systems should be much higher than that of other auxiliary systems, but traditional methods cannot systematically reflect this difference and lack a scientific risk management approach.

[0008] Therefore, optimizing the existing self-inspection model and designing an intelligent self-inspection questionnaire generation method that can ensure the comprehensiveness of the inspection, highlight core risks, improve inspection efficiency, and avoid formalism has become an urgent technical problem to be solved in order to improve the intrinsic safety level of high-risk vessels. Summary of the Invention

[0009] In view of this, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a method, apparatus, equipment and storage medium for detecting high-risk ships, in order to solve at least some of the above-mentioned problems.

[0010] In a first aspect, embodiments of this application provide a method for generating a safety self-inspection questionnaire for high-risk vessels, applied to a terminal, the method comprising:

[0011] A database of questions for target vessel inspection and investigation was selected based on high-risk vessel types.

[0012] The target ship inspection and investigation question base is divided into a core investigation question set and multiple polling investigation question sets;

[0013] Select at least a portion of the question set for each of the at least one polling survey classes;

[0014] Generate a ship inspection questionnaire, which includes the core set of survey questions and at least a portion of each polling set of survey questions;

[0015] The polling survey question set includes: a first polling survey question set and a second polling survey question set, wherein the polling period of the first polling survey question set is shorter than the polling period of the second polling survey question set;

[0016] The following methods were used to select core question categories from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database:

[0017] Obtain key operations and high-risk tasks for high-risk vessels, and based on the key operations and high-risk tasks, delineate a set of core investigation questions from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database;

[0018] The second round of survey questions was selected using the following method:

[0019] Obtain non-critical operations of high-risk vessels, and based on the non-critical operations, delineate first and second round-robin survey question sets from the target vessel inspection and investigation question set database, wherein the criticality level of the first round-robin survey question set is higher than that of the second round-robin survey question set.

[0020] One possible approach is to select at least a portion of the target polling question set from the first and second polling question sets in the following manner:

[0021] Determine the problem selection mode;

[0022] Based on the question selection mode, target polling questions are selected from the current target polling question set, wherein the target polling questions are at least a portion of the current target polling question set;

[0023] The current set of target polling survey questions is updated based on the target row polling survey question.

[0024] The target polling survey question exists in the target polling survey question set before the update, and the target polling survey question does not exist in the target polling survey question set after the update.

[0025] One possible approach is that both the first and second polling survey question sets are configured with polling periods, and each polling period has multiple polling nodes.

[0026] If the current security detection node is the last polling node in the current polling cycle of the target polling survey question set, then the target polling survey question is all of the current target polling survey question set.

[0027] One possible approach is that, at each polling node, the number of questions selected from the target polling survey question set meets the target number;

[0028] In the step of selecting at least a portion of the question set for each of the at least one polling survey class:

[0029] If the question selection mode is random mode:

[0030] Then, a target polling question is randomly selected from the current set of target polling questions.

[0031] If the question is set to custom mode:

[0032] Then, retrieve the first target polling question selected by the user from the current target polling question set, and randomly select the second target polling question from the current target polling question set.

[0033] The target polling survey questions include a first target polling survey question and a second target polling survey question, and the number of the first target polling survey questions and the second target polling survey questions meets the target number.

[0034] One possible approach is to determine the target number as follows, if the number of safety inspection nodes in each ship safety inspection cycle is n:

[0035]

[0036] N—The number of questions in the target polling survey set;

[0037] n — the number of polling nodes in the polling cycle of the target polling survey question set.

[0038] m — target quantity.

[0039] One possible approach is that, after the step of generating the ship inspection questionnaire, the method includes:

[0040] Obtain the answers to each high-risk vessel inspection survey question in the vessel inspection survey questionnaire;

[0041] The answers to the target high-risk vessel inspection survey questions in the vessel inspection survey questionnaire were obtained using the following method:

[0042] Based on the aforementioned high-risk vessel detection and investigation issues, target hardware security issues, target process security issues, and target behavior security issues are generated.

[0043] The crew level is obtained, and the target hardware safety requirements and target process safety requirements are generated by matching the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements. The target behavioral safety requirements are generated by matching the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions, the crew level, and the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements.

[0044] Based on the current condition of the vessel and its crew, ship inspectors determine whether the vessel's operations meet the target hardware safety requirements, the target process safety requirements, and the target behavioral safety requirements, in order to answer the aforementioned target hardware safety issues, target process safety issues, and target behavioral safety issues.

[0045] One possible approach is that the method further includes:

[0046] If the answer to the target hardware security question is "not in compliance with requirements", the terminal interface will display high-risk ship hardware.

[0047] Select target hardware from the high-risk ship hardware and display the corresponding hardware security items for the target hardware;

[0048] Ship inspectors compare the current target hardware status with the corresponding hardware security items of the target hardware and input the comparison results into the terminal.

[0049] and / or

[0050] If the answer to the target behavior security question is "not in compliance with requirements", the terminal will display the behavior security item.

[0051] Ship inspectors compare the current crew safety behavior with the aforementioned safety items and input the comparison results into the terminal.

[0052] and / or

[0053] If the answer to the target process safety question is not in compliance with the requirements, the terminal will display the process safety item.

[0054] Ship inspectors compare the current ship process safety behavior with the aforementioned safety items and input the comparison results into the terminal.

[0055] Secondly, this application provides a device for generating a self-inspection questionnaire for the safety of high-risk vessels, applied to a terminal, including:

[0056] The first selection module is used to select a database of questions for target vessel inspection and investigation based on high-risk vessel types.

[0057] The partitioning module is used to divide the target ship inspection and investigation question base into a core set of investigation questions and multiple sets of polling investigation questions.

[0058] The second selection module: selects at least a portion of the question sets for each of the at least one polling survey classes;

[0059] Generation module: used to generate a ship inspection survey questionnaire, which includes the core survey question set and at least a selected portion of each polling survey question set;

[0060] The polling survey question set includes: a first polling survey question set and a second polling survey question set, wherein the polling period of the first polling survey question set is shorter than the polling period of the second polling survey question set;

[0061] The following methods were used to select core question categories from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database:

[0062] Obtain key operations and high-risk tasks for high-risk vessels, and based on the key operations and high-risk tasks, delineate a set of core investigation questions from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database;

[0063] The second round of survey questions was selected using the following method:

[0064] Obtain non-critical operations of high-risk vessels, and based on the non-critical operations, delineate first and second round-robin survey question sets from the target vessel inspection and investigation question set database, wherein the criticality level of the first round-robin survey question set is higher than that of the second round-robin survey question set.

[0065] Thirdly, this application provides an electronic device, comprising:

[0066] At least one processor; and

[0067] At least one memory communicatively connected to the processor, wherein:

[0068] The memory stores program instructions that can be executed by the processor, which can invoke the program instructions to perform the method as described in the first aspect.

[0069] Fourthly, this application provides a computer-readable storage medium that stores computer instructions that cause the computer to perform the method described in the first aspect.

[0070] Compared with the prior art, this application has the following significant advantages:

[0071] Significantly improves inspection efficiency and quality: This method, through the generation of dynamic questionnaires, keeps the number of items inspected per visit within a reasonable range. Inspectors no longer need to deal with a cumbersome full list of questions, but can focus on the items that require the most immediate attention. This greatly shortens the time required for a single inspection and allows inspectors to have more energy to conduct in-depth and detailed verification of each item in the questionnaire, thereby effectively improving the quality of the inspection.

[0072] Strengthening risk focus and highlighting core safety: This method ensures that safety items directly related to the ship's "critical operations and high-risk work" receive mandatory, top-priority attention in every inspection by classifying them into "core investigation questions" and "round-trip investigation questions." This guarantees that the "key" to ship safety management is firmly grasped, effectively preventing the risk of overlooking major safety hazards due to distraction, and making safety management more targeted.

[0073] Introducing a dynamic polling mechanism overcomes "inspection fatigue": By setting up "polling survey question sets" with different cycles, this method ensures that the content of each generated questionnaire is different. This dynamic change keeps inspectors engaged and alert, prompting them to actively think and conduct actual inspections. It effectively avoids the complacency and formalism that can result from using fixed questionnaires for a long time, ensuring that self-inspection work is truly implemented.

[0074] Achieving scientific and differentiated risk management: This method further divides non-critical operations into first and second rounds of investigation with different levels of criticality, and matches them with different investigation cycles. This reflects the concept of risk-based differentiated management, that is, projects with higher importance (first round of investigation) are investigated more frequently, while projects with less importance (second round of investigation) are covered with a longer cycle. This arrangement not only ensures the comprehensiveness of the investigation, but also makes the investment of safety resources more scientific and economical, realizing refined safety monitoring of ships in all aspects and throughout their entire life cycle.

[0075] In summary, this invention, through an innovative dynamic questionnaire generation strategy, successfully solves the problems of low efficiency, lack of focus, and tendency to become a mere formality in traditional self-inspection methods. It provides a more intelligent, efficient, and scientific safety self-inspection tool for high-risk vessels, thereby significantly improving the inherent safety level of ships.

[0076] Other features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and will be apparent in part from the description, or may be learned by practicing the invention. The objects and other advantages of the invention are realized and obtained in accordance with the structures particularly pointed out in the description, claims and drawings.

[0077] To make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more apparent and understandable, preferred embodiments are described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Attached Figure Description

[0078] To more clearly illustrate the specific embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the specific embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained from these drawings without creative effort.

[0079] Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a method for generating a safety self-inspection questionnaire for high-risk vessels, provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0080] Figure 2 Flowchart of another method for generating a safety self-inspection questionnaire for high-risk vessels provided in this embodiment of the invention;

[0081] Figure 3 Flowchart of another method for generating a safety self-inspection questionnaire for high-risk vessels provided in this embodiment of the invention;

[0082] Figure 4 This is a structural diagram of a high-risk ship safety self-inspection questionnaire generation device provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0083] Figure 5This is a structural diagram of an electronic device. Detailed Implementation

[0084] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0085] According to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations, vessels carrying flammable and explosive dangerous goods, such as explosives, compressed gases, flammable liquids, or flammable solids, are defined as high-risk vessels. In order to conduct safety inspections of dangerous vessels, the IMO and the International Association of Classification Societies have developed regulations for high-risk vessels, and national regulatory agencies have also developed corresponding regulations to control high-risk vessels.

[0086] According to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations, vessels carrying flammable and explosive dangerous goods, such as explosives, compressed gases, flammable liquids, or flammable solids, are defined as high-risk vessels. In order to conduct safety inspections of dangerous vessels, the IMO and the International Association of Classification Societies have developed regulations for high-risk vessels, and national regulatory agencies have also developed corresponding regulations to control high-risk vessels.

[0087] Currently, ship safety self-inspections generally rely on a fixed, standardized questionnaire or checklist. Crew members or managers check each item against this comprehensive checklist. However, this traditional self-inspection method has the following significant drawbacks:

[0088] Inefficient inspection: Traditional questionnaires typically contain hundreds of inspection items, covering all aspects of the ship. Each inspection requires a significant amount of time and effort to go through all the items, many of which are non-critical and stable in the short term, making repeated inspections unnecessary and resulting in a waste of human and time resources.

[0089] This leads to "inspection fatigue" and formalism: When crew members repeatedly face the same lengthy and unchanging questionnaires, they are prone to complacency and boredom, viewing self-inspection as merely a "check-off" task rather than a genuine effort to discover and solve problems. This "inspection fatigue" renders inspections a mere formality, significantly weakening their intended early warning function.

[0090] Lack of risk focus: In a large and comprehensive checklist, all inspection items are given the same weight in form. This makes it difficult for inspectors to focus their main efforts on the critical equipment and operations with the highest risk level that are relevant to the current operation, resulting in a dilution of the focus of safety management. The real high-risk points may be overlooked due to the dispersion of inspection efforts.

[0091] The inspection lacks systematic and scientific rigor: fixed inspection models fail to implement differentiated inspection strategies based on the risk levels and failure cycles of different equipment and systems. For example, the inspection frequency of certain critical systems should be much higher than that of other auxiliary systems, but traditional methods cannot systematically reflect this difference and lack a scientific risk management approach.

[0092] Therefore, optimizing the existing self-inspection model and designing an intelligent self-inspection questionnaire generation method that can ensure the comprehensiveness of the inspection, highlight core risks, improve inspection efficiency, and avoid formalism has become an urgent technical problem to be solved in order to improve the intrinsic safety level of high-risk vessels.

[0093] Based on this, embodiments of the present invention provide a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for detecting high-risk ships, in order to solve the above-mentioned problems.

[0094] To facilitate understanding of this embodiment, a high-risk ship detection method disclosed in this embodiment of the invention will first be described in detail.

[0095] Reference Figure 1 In the embodiments provided in this application, S10 is first executed: a target ship detection and investigation question database is selected based on the high-risk ship type.

[0096] In this application, the target vessel inspection and investigation question database is the same as the vessel inspection and investigation question database corresponding to the high-risk vessel type.

[0097] In the embodiments provided in the application, referring to Table 1, the types of high-risk vessels and the corresponding survey question database for each type of high-risk vessel are as follows:

[0098] Table 1

[0099]

[0100]

[0101] For example, assuming the high-risk vessel type is crude oil tanker, then the target vessel inspection and investigation problem database is crude oil tanker.

[0102] In this application, the target vessel inspection and investigation question database is the same as the vessel inspection and investigation question database corresponding to the high-risk vessel type.

[0103] S20: Divide the target ship inspection and investigation question base into a core set of investigation questions and multiple sets of polling investigation questions.

[0104] By dividing the ship inspection and investigation question database into core investigation questions and a set of polling investigation questions, the core investigation questions must be answered during each self-inspection process. For polling questions, a polling cycle is set, which improves the rationality of the self-inspection and investigation, and enables high-risk ships to focus on high-risk points in each safety inspection.

[0105] In this example, the core question classes are selected from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database in the following manner:

[0106] Obtain key operations and high-risk tasks for high-risk vessels, and based on these key operations and high-risk tasks, define a core set of investigation questions from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database.

[0107] By dividing the ship inspection and investigation question database into core investigation questions and a set of polling investigation questions, the core investigation questions must be answered during each self-inspection process. For polling questions, a polling cycle is set, which improves the rationality of the self-inspection and investigation, and enables high-risk ships to focus on high-risk points in each safety inspection.

[0108] By using the above method, a set of core investigation questions was selected, and key operations and high-risk operations of high-risk vessels were listed as core investigation questions. These questions must be answered in each subsequent safety investigation, thereby focusing on key issues in the inspection of dangerous vessels and improving the rationality of the self-inspection questionnaire.

[0109] As a preferred embodiment, the polling survey question set includes: a first polling survey set and a second polling survey set, wherein the polling period of the first polling survey question set is shorter than the polling period of the second polling survey question set.

[0110] To obtain the first and second polling survey question sets, firstly, the non-critical operations of high-risk vessels are obtained, and then, based on the non-critical operations, the first and second polling survey question sets are delineated from the target vessel inspection survey question library.

[0111] Here, the criticality level of the first round of survey questions is higher than that of the second round of survey questions.

[0112] In summary, this application improves the rationality of the self-inspection questionnaire by setting core questions and different polling cycles for ship hazard levels.

[0113] Then execute S30: Generate a ship inspection survey questionnaire.

[0114] In the embodiments provided in this application, the ship inspection questionnaire includes a core survey question class and at least a portion selected from each polling survey class.

[0115] Compared with existing technologies, the "method for generating a safety self-inspection questionnaire for high-risk ships" proposed in this invention has the following significant advantages:

[0116] Significantly improves inspection efficiency and quality: This method, through the generation of dynamic questionnaires, keeps the number of items inspected per visit within a reasonable range. Inspectors no longer need to deal with a cumbersome full list of questions, but can focus on the items that require the most immediate attention. This greatly shortens the time required for a single inspection and allows inspectors to have more energy to conduct in-depth and detailed verification of each item in the questionnaire, thereby effectively improving the quality of the inspection.

[0117] Strengthening risk focus and highlighting core safety: This method ensures that safety items directly related to the ship's "critical operations and high-risk work" receive mandatory, top-priority attention in every inspection by classifying them into "core investigation questions" and "round-trip investigation questions." This guarantees that the "key" to ship safety management is firmly grasped, effectively preventing the risk of overlooking major safety hazards due to distraction, and making safety management more targeted.

[0118] Introducing a dynamic polling mechanism overcomes "inspection fatigue": By setting up "polling survey question sets" with different cycles, this method ensures that the content of each generated questionnaire is different. This dynamic change keeps inspectors engaged and alert, prompting them to actively think and conduct actual inspections. It effectively avoids the complacency and formalism that can result from using fixed questionnaires for a long time, ensuring that self-inspection work is truly implemented.

[0119] Achieving scientific and differentiated risk management: This method further divides non-critical operations into first and second rounds of investigation with different levels of criticality, and matches them with different investigation cycles. This reflects the concept of risk-based differentiated management, that is, projects with higher importance (first round of investigation) are investigated more frequently, while projects with less importance (second round of investigation) are covered with a longer cycle. This arrangement not only ensures the comprehensiveness of the investigation, but also makes the investment of safety resources more scientific and economical, realizing refined safety monitoring of ships in all aspects and throughout their entire life cycle.

[0120] In summary, this invention, through an innovative dynamic questionnaire generation strategy, successfully solves the problems of low efficiency, lack of focus, and tendency to become a mere formality in traditional self-inspection methods. It provides a more intelligent, efficient, and scientific safety self-inspection tool for high-risk vessels, thereby significantly improving the inherent safety level of ships.

[0121] In the embodiments provided in this application, at least a portion of the target polling survey question set is selected from the first and second polling survey question sets in the following manner:

[0122] First, determine the question selection pattern. Then, based on the question selection pattern, select target polling questions from the current set of target polling questions.

[0123] Assuming the question selection mode is random, once the question selection mode is determined, a target polling question is randomly selected from the current target polling question set.

[0124] Assuming the question selection mode is custom, the target polling question is determined from the current target polling question set based on the user's selection.

[0125] Finally, the current set of target polling survey questions is updated based on the target row polling survey question.

[0126] Here, the target polling question does not exist in the updated target polling question set, but exists in the original target polling question set. In other words, in this step, the target polling question is excluded from the current target polling question set.

[0127] By using the above method, all questions in the polling question bank are answered in a polling manner, so that for non-core questions, only a portion of the questions need to be answered during each self-check, thus improving the efficiency of the self-check.

[0128] In the example provided in this application, both the first and second polling survey question sets are configured with polling periods, and each polling period is configured with multiple polling nodes. If the current security detection node is the last polling node of the current polling period of the target polling survey question set, the target polling survey questions are all of the current target polling survey question set.

[0129] Using the above method, assuming that the current time is the last polling node of the polling cycle, all questions in the polling survey question set are selected, thus achieving polling of all questions.

[0130] Based on the implementation example, assuming that the number of questions selected from the target polling survey question set meets the target number in each polling node, and as mentioned above, the question selection mode can be specifically divided into random mode and custom mode.

[0131] Assuming the user specifies a random mode, a target polling question is randomly selected from the current set of target polling questions.

[0132] Assuming the question selection mode is custom mode, when the user selects the first target polling question, the terminal obtains the first target polling question selected by the user from the current target polling question set and randomly selects the second target polling question from the current target polling question set.

[0133] In this embodiment, the first target polling question represents the polling question selected by the user, and the second target polling question represents the randomly selected polling question.

[0134] In this mode, the target polling survey questions include a first target polling survey question and a second target polling survey question, and the number of questions in the first target polling survey question and the second target polling survey question meets the target number.

[0135] As a preferred embodiment, to ensure that the number of questions selected from the target polling survey question set is consistent in each polling process, if the number of safety inspection nodes in each ship safety inspection cycle is n, the target number is determined as follows:

[0136]

[0137] N—The number of questions in the target polling survey set;

[0138] n — the number of polling nodes in the polling cycle of the target polling survey question set.

[0139] m — target quantity.

[0140] After the ship inspection survey questionnaire is generated.

[0141] Reference Figure 2 After executing S30: generating the ship inspection survey questionnaire, execute S40: obtaining the answers to each high-risk ship inspection survey question in the ship inspection survey questionnaire.

[0142] In the embodiments provided in this application, the answers to the target high-risk vessel inspection survey questions in the vessel inspection survey questionnaire are obtained in the following manner. The target high-risk vessel inspection survey questions correspond to specific questions in the vessel inspection survey questionnaire. In other words, the target high-risk vessel inspection survey questions are at least some of the questions in the vessel inspection survey questionnaire.

[0143] To improve the accuracy of ship safety inspections, in the embodiments provided in this application, the answers to the investigation questions of high-risk target ships can be obtained from multiple dimensions.

[0144] Reference Figure 3As a preferred embodiment, firstly, S301 a is executed: based on the target high-risk ship detection and investigation problem, a target hardware security problem, a target process security problem, and a target behavior security problem are generated.

[0145] S301 b: Obtain crew level, match the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements to generate target hardware safety requirements and target process safety requirements, and match the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions, the crew level with the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions and the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements to generate target behavioral safety requirements.

[0146] In the embodiments provided in this application, the safety inspection requirements for high-risk vessels can be specifically compiled based on the safety guidelines published by the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS). The safety guidelines published by the ICS specifically stipulate safety guidelines for helicopter and ship collaborative operations, ship emergency safety guidelines, and engine room safety operation guidelines, etc. Once the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions are obtained, the target hardware safety requirements and target process safety requirements can be determined based on the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions.

[0147] The target hardware safety requirements and target process safety requirements are generated based on the safety guidelines issued by the International Council of Shipping (ICS) and the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions. In other words, they are the hardware safety requirements and process safety requirements corresponding to the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions.

[0148] Regarding the target behavioral safety requirements, the behavioral safety requirements differ depending on the crew member's level. Therefore, in order to obtain the target behavioral safety requirements, the crew member level must first be selected. Once the crew member level is selected, the indexing principle can be used to match the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation question, the crew member level, the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation question, and the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements to generate the behavioral safety requirements corresponding to the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation question, i.e., the target behavioral safety requirements.

[0149] For keyword matching, those skilled in the art may use the IDF algorithm or other methods, which are not limited here.

[0150] Once the target hardware safety requirements, target process safety requirements, target behavior safety requirements, and ship inspection location requirements are obtained, S303c is executed: the ship inspector determines, based on the current situation of the ship and crew, whether the ship operation meets the target hardware safety requirements, whether the operation process meets the target process safety requirements, and whether the crew's operation behavior meets the target behavior safety requirements, in order to answer the target hardware safety issues, target process safety issues, and target behavior safety issues.

[0151] Taking the captain and senior officers' familiarity with the company's cargo sampling procedures as an example, the generated questions in this example are as follows:

[0152] Regarding whether the hardware meets the requirements, two options are provided: no obvious changes or defects, or visible or detectable defects. Ship inspectors can choose based on the actual situation.

[0153] In this context, whether the hardware meets the requirements corresponds to the target hardware security issue.

[0154] Regarding process safety, four progressive options are available: exceeding expectations, as expected, basically as expected, and falling short of expectations. Based on the current condition of the ship and crew, ship inspectors determine whether the ship's operations meet the target process safety requirements and select the answer from the four progressive options.

[0155] Regarding the target behavioral safety requirements, two options are provided: "meets expectations" and "does not meet expectations". After the crew level is selected, the ship inspectors will determine whether the behavioral safety requirements are met based on the current situation of the ship and crew.

[0156] In this application, based on the inspection requirements of the International Maritime Organization or other authoritative inspection agencies, a ship inspection questionnaire was developed. Each question in the ship inspection questionnaire was answered from multiple dimensions, including behavior, process, and hardware, thereby improving the reliability of self-inspection of high-risk ships and enhancing their safety.

[0157] In some scenarios, if the answer to the target behavior security question is not in compliance with the requirements, the terminal will display a behavior security item.

[0158] In this embodiment, the behavioral security item is determined based on the target hardware security requirements.

[0159] Continuing with the previous example, are the captain and senior officers familiar with the company's procedures for cargo sampling? Assuming that the cargo equipment requirements in the hardware do not meet expectations, the specific cargo equipment requirements for high-risk vessels related to this issue include unloading systems, ventilation systems - cargo holds and fuel tanks, auxiliary systems and equipment - cargo, etc.

[0160] Assuming that the auxiliary system and equipment - cargo is selected, the displayed hardware safety items are: existing tasks - incomplete, existing maintenance tasks - the seen condition is inconsistent with the record, maintenance tasks not established, etc. The ship inspector compares the current crew safety behavior with the above safety items and inputs the comparison results into the terminal.

[0161] In some embodiments, the answer to the target process safety question is "not in compliance with requirements," and the terminal displays a process observation item.

[0162] When choosing between two options, select the observation that the hardware did not meet expectations: 1. Available maintenance task - not completed; 2. Available maintenance task - records do not match observed condition; 3. No maintenance task assigned; 4. Maintenance delayed - waiting for spare parts; 5. Maintenance delayed - waiting for technicians; 6. Maintenance delayed - waiting for shutdown / no gas hazard (condition); 7. Sudden failure - available and up-to-date maintenance task; 8. Other - textual description.

[0163] When selecting the level-based multiple-choice question, choose the observation item indicating that the hardware did not meet expectations: 1. Available maintenance tasks - incomplete; 2. Available maintenance tasks - records do not match actual observations; 3. No maintenance tasks assigned; 4. Maintenance delayed - waiting for spare parts; 5. Maintenance delayed - waiting for technicians; 6. Maintenance delayed - waiting for equipment shutdown / no gas hazard (state); 7. Sudden failure - available and up-to-date maintenance tasks; 8. Other - textual description.

[0164] If no answer is required, select the following reason for not requiring an answer regarding the hardware: 1. Not Applicable - Follow the instructions in the question guide. 2. Equipment Not Installed - Incorrect entry in the Ship Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ). 3. Equipment Not Installed - Incorrect entry in the Ship Safety Inspection Questionnaire (HVPQ). 4. Equipment Not Installed - No errors in either the Ship Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ) or the Ship Safety Inspection Questionnaire (HVPQ). 5. Equipment Not Found - Removed from the ship for repairs. 6. Inspection Terminated Before Completion - (The equipment) was not found. 7. Other - Provide a reason.

[0165] Continuing with the previous example, are the captain and senior officers familiar with the company's cargo sampling procedures? Assuming the reliability of the process and the planned maintenance system requirements do not meet expectations, the specific planned maintenance system requirements for high-risk vessels related to this issue include: 1. Equipment / machinery included in the planned maintenance system; 2. Spare parts inventory; 3. Scheduled task timetable / records of completed maintenance; 4. Provision of guidance and training on the planned maintenance system (PMS).

[0166] If the answer to the target process security question is not in compliance with the requirements, the terminal will display the process security item.

[0167] Ship inspectors compare the current ship process safety behavior with the aforementioned safety items and input the comparison results into the terminal.

[0168] When choosing between two options, select the observation that the process did not meet expectations: 1. No program; 2. Program not provided / unavailable / inaccessible; 3. Too many program contradictions; 4. Program clarity / comprehensibility; 5. Program accuracy / correctness; 6. Program practicality / feasibility / applicability; 7. Program completeness / effectiveness / version; 8. Program communication / practical updates; 9. Other - see text.

[0169] When choosing the level-based multiple-choice question, select the observations for which the process did not meet expectations: 1. No procedure; 2. Procedure not provided / unavailable / inaccessible; 3. Too many program contradictions; 4. Procedure clarity / comprehensibility; 5. Procedure accuracy / correctness; 6. Procedure practicality / feasibility / applicability; 7. Procedure completeness / effectiveness / version; 8. Procedure communication / practical updates; 9. Other - see text.

[0170] If no answer is required, select the reason why no answer is needed: 1. Not applicable - Follow the instructions in the question guide. 2. Equipment not installed - Therefore, no related procedure is required. 3. The vessel is not certified to perform this operation - Entry error in the Ship Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ). 4. The vessel is not certified to perform this operation - Entry error in the Ship Safety Inspection Questionnaire (HVPQ). 5. The vessel is not certified to perform this operation - No errors were found in either the Ship Inspection Questionnaire (PIQ) or the Ship Safety Inspection Questionnaire (HVPQ). 6. The inspection was terminated before completion - No relevant information was found. 7. Other - Provide a reason.

[0171] Continuing with the previous example, are the captain and senior officers familiar with the company's cargo sampling procedures? Assuming the behavioral requirements are not met, the specific crew ranks required for high-risk vessel operations related to this issue include: 1. Senior Deck Officer (Senior Officer) 2. Junior Deck Officer (Junior Officer) 3. Senior Engineer 4. Junior Engineer (Ordinary Crew Level) 5. Deck Team Tasks – Historical Record 6. Engine Room Team Tasks – Historical Record

[0172] If the answer to the target behavior security question is not in compliance with the requirements, the terminal will display the behavior security item.

[0173] Ship inspectors compare the current-rank crew member's safety behavior with the aforementioned safety items and input the comparison results into the terminal.

[0174] Prerequisites must be met – crew rank selection. When the input behavior results in the Ship Inspection Questionnaire (PIF) and is either greater than or substantially as expected, the following should be considered: 1. Perception of the safety importance of the task or related procedures; 2. Conventions and practices surrounding the use of procedures; 3. For the task, the procedures are readily available, helpful, understandable, and accurate; 4. Team interaction, communication, and collaboration with others; 5. Indications of stress, workload, fatigue, or time constraints; 6. Factors such as morale, motivation, and tension; 7. Workplace ergonomics, including signage, tools, layout, space, noise, lighting, and temperature; 8. Human-machine interface (e.g., controls, alarms); 9. Learning or practical opportunities.

[0175] Prerequisites are required – crew rank. When expectations are not met, the following factors should be considered in the Ship Inspection Questionnaire (PIF): 1. Awareness of the safety criticality of the task or related procedures; 2. Habitual practices and routines surrounding the use of procedures; 3. For the task, are the relevant procedures readily available, helpful, understandable, and accurate?; 4. Team dynamics, communication with others, and collaboration; 5. Signs of stress, workload, fatigue, or time constraints; 6. Morale, motivation, and tension; 7. Workplace ergonomics, including signage, tools, layout, space, noise, lighting, and temperature; 8. Human-machine interfaces (e.g., controls, alarms); 9. Learning or practical opportunities; 10. Not identified.

[0176] Prerequisites - Crew rank are required. If no answer is needed, please select the reason for not answering: 1. Not applicable - Follow the instructions in the question guide. 2. Equipment not installed - Therefore, familiarity with the relevant procedures is not required. 3. The vessel is not certified to perform this operation - Therefore, familiarity with (the relevant operation) is not required. 4. The inspection was terminated before completion - No relevant situation was observed. 5. Other - Provide a reason.

[0177] Regarding the investigation of high-risk vessels, each question corresponds to a different safety level. For the critical operations and high-risk work of high-risk vessels, the International Maritime Organization or other authoritative inspection agencies need to inspect high-risk vessels in each inspection. For such questions, they are marked as core question base questions, and the remaining questions are marked as a set of polling investigation questions. In other words, in this application, the set of polling investigation questions will recur periodically, and each question in the set of polling investigation questions will appear once every three times.

[0178] Reference Figure 4 Based on the foregoing embodiments, this application provides a device for generating a high-risk vessel safety self-inspection questionnaire, comprising:

[0179] Reference Figure 4 This application provides a device for generating a self-inspection questionnaire for the safety of high-risk vessels, comprising:

[0180] The first selection module is used to select a database of questions for target vessel inspection and investigation based on high-risk vessel types.

[0181] The partitioning module is used to divide the target ship inspection and investigation question base into a core set of investigation questions and multiple sets of polling investigation questions.

[0182] The second selection module: selects at least a portion of the question sets for each of the at least one polling survey classes;

[0183] Generation module: used to generate a ship inspection survey questionnaire, which includes the core survey question set and at least a selected portion of each polling survey question set;

[0184] The polling survey question set includes: a first polling survey question set and a second polling survey question set, wherein the polling period of the first polling survey question set is shorter than the polling period of the second polling survey question set;

[0185] The following methods were used to select core question categories from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database:

[0186] Obtain key operations and high-risk tasks for high-risk vessels, and based on the key operations and high-risk tasks, delineate a set of core investigation questions from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database;

[0187] The second round of survey questions was selected using the following method:

[0188] Obtain non-critical operations of high-risk vessels, and based on the non-critical operations, delineate first and second round-robin survey question sets from the target vessel inspection and investigation question set database, wherein the criticality level of the first round-robin survey question set is higher than that of the second round-robin survey question set.

[0189] The following is a specific example:

[0190] Taking high-risk vessels carrying flammable and explosive materials as an example, once the type of high-risk vessel is determined, a database of questions for vessel inspection and investigation is established.

[0191] Assuming there are 1000 high-risk ship inspection and investigation questions in the ship inspection and investigation question database, the key operations and high-risk tasks of high-risk ships are obtained from these 1000 high-risk ship inspection and investigation questions, and the core investigation question set is selected. The inspection and investigation questions are divided into polling investigation questions, and a first polling investigation question set and a second polling investigation question set are generated.

[0192] In this example, the first round of survey questions contains 200 survey questions, and the second round of survey questions contains 400 questions. The polling period for the first round of survey questions is 4, and the polling period for the second round of survey questions is [missing information].

[0193] Assuming the question selection mode is random, 50 questions are randomly selected from the first and second rounds of survey question sets, respectively. The core survey question set and the 100 randomly selected questions are then combined to generate a ship inspection survey questionnaire.

[0194] Once the ship inspection questionnaire is generated, for each question in the questionnaire, hardware safety requirements, process safety requirements, behavioral safety requirements, and ship inspection location requirements are obtained separately to generate hardware safety questions, process safety questions, behavioral safety questions, and ship inspection locations.

[0195] Inspectors compare the actual condition of the vessel with the industry standards and best practices involved in the question to determine whether the vessel meets the requirements, and record the results as different levels of performance such as "exceeds expectations", "meets requirements", "basically meets requirements" and "does not meet requirements".

[0196] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in a flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, segment, or portion of code containing one or more executable instructions for implementing a specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the blocks may occur in a different order than those shown in the drawings. For example, two consecutive blocks may actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they may sometimes be executed in reverse order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each block in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and / or flowcharts, can be implemented using a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or action, or using a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0197] Figure 5 A block diagram is shown that is suitable for implementing embodiments of the present invention. Figure 5 The electronic device shown is merely an example and should not impose any limitation on the functionality and scope of use of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0198] like Figure 5 As shown, the electronic device is represented in the form of a general-purpose computing device. The components of the electronic device may include, but are not limited to: one or more processors 410, a communication interface 420, a memory 430, and a communication bus 440 connecting different system components (including the memory 430 and the processor 410).

[0199] Communication bus 440 represents one or more of several bus architectures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, a graphics acceleration port, a processor, or a local bus using any of the various bus architectures. For example, these architectures include, but are not limited to, Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) buses, Micro Channel Architecture (MAC) buses, Enhanced ISA buses, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local buses, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) buses.

[0200] Electronic devices typically include a variety of computer-readable media. These media can be any available media that can be accessed by the electronic device, including volatile and non-volatile media, and removable and non-removable media.

[0201] Memory 430 may include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) and / or cache memory. The electronic device may further include other removable / non-removable, volatile / non-volatile computer system storage media. Memory 430 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules configured to perform the functions of various embodiments of the present invention.

[0202] A program / utility having a set (at least one) of program modules can be stored in memory 430. Such program modules include—but are not limited to—an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. Each or some combination of these examples may include an implementation of a network environment. The program modules typically perform the functions and / or methods described in the embodiments of this invention.

[0203] Processor 410 executes various functional applications and data processing by running programs stored in memory 430, such as implementing embodiments of the present invention. Figures 1-3 The method provided in the illustrated embodiment.

[0204] This invention provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that stores computer instructions, which cause the computer to execute embodiments of this invention. Figures 1-3 The method provided in the illustrated embodiment.

[0205] The aforementioned computer-readable storage medium may be any combination of one or more computer-readable media. A computer-readable medium may be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium. A computer-readable storage medium may be, for example,—but not limited to—an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media (a non-exhaustive list) include: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), or flash memory, optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage device, magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination thereof. In this document, a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium containing or storing a program that may be used by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0206] Computer-readable signal media may include data signals propagated in baseband or as part of a carrier wave, carrying computer-readable program code. Such propagated data signals may take various forms, including—but not limited to—electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination thereof. Computer-readable signal media may also be any computer-readable medium other than computer-readable storage media, capable of transmitting, propagating, or transmitting programs for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

[0207] The program code contained on a computer-readable medium may be transmitted using any suitable medium, including—but not limited to—wireless, wire, optical fiber, RF, etc., or any suitable combination thereof.

[0208] Computer program code for performing the operations of embodiments of the present invention can be written in one or more programming languages ​​or a combination thereof, including object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, Smalltalk, and C++, and conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as C or similar languages. The program code can be executed entirely on the user's computer, partially on the user's computer, as a standalone software package, partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or entirely on a remote computer or server. In cases involving remote computers, the remote computer can be connected to the user's computer via any type of network—including a Local Area Network (LAN) or a Wide Area Network (WAN), or it can be connected to an external computer (e.g., via the Internet using an Internet service provider).

[0209] The foregoing has described specific embodiments of the present invention. Other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims. In some cases, the actions or steps described in the claims may be performed in a different order than that shown in the embodiments and may still achieve the desired results. Furthermore, the processes depicted in the drawings do not necessarily require the specific or sequential order shown to achieve the desired results. In some embodiments, multitasking and parallel processing are also possible or may be advantageous.

[0210] In the description of the embodiments of the present invention, the terms "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "example," "specific example," or "some examples," etc., refer to specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described in connection with that embodiment or example, which are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present invention. In the embodiments of the present invention, the illustrative expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in a suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples. Furthermore, without contradiction, those skilled in the art can combine and integrate the different embodiments or examples described in the embodiments of the present invention, as well as the features of the different embodiments or examples.

[0211] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of indicated technical features. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of that feature. In the description of embodiments of the present invention, "multiple" means at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise explicitly specified.

[0212] Any process or method description in the flowchart or otherwise herein can be understood as representing a module, segment, or portion of code comprising one or more executable instructions for implementing custom logic functions or processes, and the scope of preferred embodiments of the invention includes additional implementations in which functions may be performed not in the order shown or discussed, including substantially simultaneously or in reverse order depending on the functions involved, as should be understood by those skilled in the art to which embodiments of the invention pertain.

[0213] Depending on the context, the word "if" as used here can be interpreted as "when," "when," "in response to determination," or "in response to detection." Similarly, depending on the context, the phrase "if determination" or "if detection (of the stated condition or event)" can be interpreted as "when determination," "in response to determination," "when detection (of the stated condition or event)," or "in response to detection (of the stated condition or event)."

[0214] It should be noted that the terminals involved in the embodiments of the present invention may include, but are not limited to, personal computers (PCs), personal digital assistants (PDAs), wireless handheld devices, tablet computers, mobile phones, MP3 players, MP4 players, etc.

[0215] In the several embodiments provided in this invention, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, apparatuses, and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative; for instance, the division of units is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the displayed or discussed mutual couplings, direct couplings, or communication connections may be through some interfaces; indirect couplings or communication connections between devices or units may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0216] Furthermore, in the various embodiments of the present invention, the functional units can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be implemented in hardware or in the form of hardware plus software functional units.

[0217] The integrated units implemented as software functional units described above can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. These software functional units, stored in a storage medium, include several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) or processor to execute some steps of the methods described in the various embodiments of this invention. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0218] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for generating a safety self-checking questionnaire for a high-risk ship, applied to a terminal, and characterized in that, The method includes: A database of questions for target vessel inspection and investigation was selected based on high-risk vessel types. The target ship inspection and investigation question base is divided into a core investigation question set and multiple polling investigation question sets; Select at least a portion of the question set for each polling class from at least one polling class; Generate a ship inspection questionnaire, which includes the core set of survey questions and at least a portion of each polling set of survey questions; The polling survey question set includes: a first polling survey question set and a second polling survey question set, wherein the polling period of the first polling survey question set is shorter than the polling period of the second polling survey question set; The following methods were used to select core question categories from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database: Obtain key operations and high-risk tasks for high-risk vessels, and based on the key operations and high-risk tasks, delineate a set of core investigation questions from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database; The second round of survey questions was selected using the following method: Obtain non-critical operations of high-risk vessels, and based on the non-critical operations, delineate first and second round-robin survey question sets from the target vessel inspection and investigation question set database, wherein the criticality level of the first round-robin survey question set is higher than that of the second round-robin survey question set.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, At least a portion of the target polling question set from the first and second polling question sets is selected in the following manner: Determine the problem selection mode; Based on the question selection mode, target polling questions are selected from the current target polling question set, wherein the target polling questions are at least a portion of the current target polling question set; The current set of target polling survey questions is updated based on the target polling survey question. The target polling survey question exists in the target polling survey question set before the update, and the target polling survey question does not exist in the target polling survey question set after the update.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein, Both the first and second polling survey question sets have polling periods, and each polling period has multiple polling nodes; If the current security detection node is the last polling node in the current polling cycle of the target polling survey question set, then the target polling survey question is the entirety of the current target polling survey question set.

4. The method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized in that, In each polling node, the number of questions selected from the target polling survey question set meets the target number; In the step of selecting at least a portion of the question set from each of the at least one polling survey class: if the question selection mode is a random mode: Then, a target polling question is randomly selected from the current set of target polling questions. If the question is set to custom mode: Then, obtain the first target polling question selected by the user from the current target polling question set, and randomly select the second target polling question from the current target polling question set; The target polling survey questions include a first target polling survey question and a second target polling survey question, and the number of the first target polling survey questions and the second target polling survey questions meets the target number.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that, If the number of safety inspection nodes in each ship safety inspection cycle is n, the target number is determined as follows: ； —The number of questions in the target polling survey set; —Number of polling nodes in the polling cycle of the target polling survey question set. —Target quantity.

6. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that, Following the step of generating the ship inspection questionnaire, the method includes: Obtain the answers to each high-risk vessel inspection survey question in the vessel inspection survey questionnaire; The answers to the target high-risk vessel inspection survey questions in the vessel inspection survey questionnaire are obtained in the following manner: target hardware security questions, target process security questions, and target behavior security questions are generated based on the target high-risk vessel inspection survey questions; The crew level is obtained, and the target hardware safety requirements and target process safety requirements are generated by matching the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements. The target behavioral safety requirements are generated by matching the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions, the crew level, and the target high-risk vessel inspection and investigation questions with the high-risk vessel safety inspection requirements. Based on the current condition of the vessel and its crew, ship inspectors determine whether the vessel's operations meet the target hardware safety requirements, the target process safety requirements, and the target behavioral safety requirements, in order to answer the aforementioned target hardware safety issues, target process safety issues, and target behavioral safety issues.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that, The method further includes: If the answer to the target hardware security question is "not in compliance with requirements", the terminal interface will display high-risk ship hardware. Select target hardware from the high-risk ship hardware and display the corresponding hardware security items for the target hardware; Ship inspectors compare the current target hardware status with the corresponding hardware security items of the target hardware and input the comparison results into the terminal. and / or If the answer to the target behavior safety question is not in compliance with the requirements, the terminal will display the behavior safety item. The ship inspection personnel will compare the current crew safety behavior with the behavior safety item and input the comparison result into the terminal. and / or If the answer to the target process safety question is not in compliance with the requirements, the terminal will display the process safety item. Ship inspectors compare the current ship process safety behavior with the aforementioned safety items and input the comparison results into the terminal.

8. A device for generating a self-inspection questionnaire for the safety of high-risk vessels, applied to a terminal, characterized in that, include: The first selection module is used to select a database of questions for target vessel inspection and investigation based on high-risk vessel types. The partitioning module is used to divide the target ship inspection and investigation question base into a core set of investigation questions and multiple sets of polling investigation questions. The second selection module: selects at least a portion of the question set for each polling class from at least one polling class; Generation module: used to generate a ship inspection survey questionnaire, which includes the core survey question set and at least a selected portion of each polling survey question set; The polling survey question set includes: a first polling survey question set and a second polling survey question set, wherein the polling period of the first polling survey question set is shorter than the polling period of the second polling survey question set; The following methods were used to select core question categories from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database: Obtain key operations and high-risk tasks for high-risk vessels, and based on the key operations and high-risk tasks, delineate a set of core investigation questions from the target vessel inspection and investigation question database; The second round of survey questions was selected using the following method: Obtain non-critical operations of high-risk vessels, and based on the non-critical operations, delineate first and second round-robin survey question sets from the target vessel inspection and investigation question set database, wherein the criticality level of the first round-robin survey question set is higher than that of the second round-robin survey question set.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; as well as At least one memory communicatively connected to the processor, wherein: The memory stores program instructions that can be executed by the processor, which can invoke the program instructions to perform the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores computer instructions that cause the computer to perform the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images