Graduation thesis management system

Abstract

The invention discloses a graduation thesis management system, and relates to the technical field of thesis management, and the system comprises a login and identity verification module which is used for enabling a teacher to log in the system and check the state of a thesis submitted by a student; the thesis management module is used for marking the thesis and proposing modification suggestions and guiding students to submit modified documents; the duplicate checking and format detection module is used for checking and auditing duplicate checking reports submitted by students, establishing a paper format checking model and obtaining a result of whether the paper is qualified or not based on the output of the model; the review and scoring module is used for scoring graduation designs of the students; and the reply management module is used for setting reply information, distributing reply groups, setting online reply questions, evaluating reply scores and obtaining final scores. The links of automatic processing login, duplicate checking, format detection, scoring and the like are provided, the working efficiency is improved, the burden of teachers is reduced, academic integrity is guaranteed, a real-time feedback mechanism and historical scoring records ensure fair and transparent, and perfect reply management ensures that the reply process is smooth.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of thesis management technology, specifically to a graduation thesis management system. Background Technology

[0002] With the development of higher education and the advancement of information technology, the management of graduation theses has become increasingly complex. The traditional manual review, plagiarism check, and evaluation process is inefficient, prone to errors, and lacks a timely feedback mechanism. Currently, many universities still rely on manual management, requiring teachers to manually check students' thesis submissions, review plagiarism check results, revise theses, and provide suggestions. The process is cumbersome and time-consuming. These problems have led to a series of difficulties, such as academic integrity issues, difficulty in ensuring the quality of theses, and low communication efficiency between students and teachers.

[0003] Therefore, there is an urgent need for a management system capable of automating plagiarism detection, formatting checks, grading, and defense. While some thesis management systems exist, most have limited functionality and often cannot simultaneously provide a complete suite of functions, including plagiarism detection, formatting checks, grading feedback, and defense scheduling. Furthermore, existing systems lack robust information recording and review mechanisms during thesis review and defense, leading to management chaos and data loss. Based on this, this invention designs an integrated and automated graduation thesis management system, aiming to improve management efficiency, ensure thesis quality, and provide a transparent grading and feedback mechanism. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To address the aforementioned technical issues, a graduation thesis management system is provided. This technical solution resolves the problems described above.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, the technical solution adopted by the present invention is as follows:

[0006] The graduation thesis management system includes:

[0007] Login and authentication module: Used for teachers to log in to the system and view the status of students' submitted papers, including input functions for account, password and verification code;

[0008] Thesis Management Module: Used by teachers to review theses and provide suggestions for revision, guiding students to submit revised documents;

[0009] Plagiarism Detection and Formatting Module: Used to view and review plagiarism reports submitted by students, establish a paper formatting check model, obtain the result of whether the paper is qualified based on the output of the model, if qualified, output to the review and scoring module for scoring, if unqualified, mark and require the paper to be corrected for formatting errors.

[0010] Review and scoring module: Used by teachers to score students' graduation projects, automatically calculate the total score based on the thesis scoring formula, and determine whether students meet the defense requirements;

[0011] The defense management module is used to set up defense information, assign defense groups, set online defense questions, evaluate defense scores, and obtain final scores.

[0012] Preferably, the login and authentication module specifically includes:

[0013] Login information input unit: Teachers enter their account, password and verification code on the login page. The system checks whether the account entered by the teacher exists in the database and compares the entered password with the password stored in the database.

[0014] Verification code verification unit: The system checks whether the input verification code is consistent with the generated verification code. If the account, password and verification code are all verified, the system allows the teacher to enter the system and view the status of the student's submitted paper.

[0015] Login Information Recording Unit: Records teachers' login time and IP address information to ensure system security and operation traceability.

[0016] Preferably, the paper management module specifically includes:

[0017] Paper List Viewing Unit: After logging into the system, teachers can access the paper management module to view a list of all submitted papers by students and sort the papers by submission time and status.

[0018] Student paper selection unit: Teachers select students' papers for review and view the basic information of the papers, including the student's name, student ID, paper title and submission time.

[0019] Paper reading unit: Teachers browse the full text of students' submitted papers online, add annotations and suggestions for revision, mark the problematic parts, and provide feedback on the revisions. When the paper content meets the requirements, the teacher marks the paper as completed.

[0020] Preferably, the plagiarism detection and format detection module specifically includes:

[0021] Plagiarism Report Acquisition Unit: The system receives papers submitted by students, performs plagiarism checks through the plagiarism detection system, and automatically generates a plagiarism report. The report includes the duplication rate, similar parts, and information on the sources of duplication.

[0022] Format detection model generation unit: Based on the school's paper format requirements, a paper format check and scoring model is established to automatically detect whether the paper meets these format requirements;

[0023] Formatting check and feedback unit: performs format checks on student-submitted papers, including title format, paragraph alignment, margins, line spacing, and reference format;

[0024] If the paper format meets the requirements, the system returns a qualified status. If a formatting problem is found, the system identifies the erroneous part and provides feedback to the student.

[0025] Preferably, the plagiarism detection and format detection module further includes:

[0026] Acceptance judgment unit: After the paper format check and plagiarism review, the system judges whether the paper meets the submission requirements and sets a plagiarism rate threshold. If the plagiarism rate exceeds the threshold, the system marks it as unacceptable and prompts the student to make corrections. If the plagiarism rate is less than the threshold and the format meets the requirements, the paper is marked as acceptable and enters the review and scoring module.

[0027] Feedback and Revision Guidance Unit: The system sends plagiarism reports and formatting detection results to students, reminds them to revise problems in their papers, automatically updates the paper's status based on the plagiarism and formatting detection results, and records all detection results.

[0028] Preferably, the step of establishing a paper format checking and scoring model based on the school's paper format requirements to automatically detect whether the paper meets these format requirements specifically includes:

[0029] The formula for the paper format check scoring model is as follows:

[0030]

[0031] In the formula, S is the total format score of the paper, n is the total number of format items in the paper, i represents the i-th format item currently being checked, and f i Let f be the scoring function for the i-th format item, where f is the score for the i-th format item if it meets the requirements. i The value is 1, the i-th format item does not meet the requirements, f i The value is 0.

[0032] Preferably, the review and scoring module specifically includes:

[0033] The scoring criteria setting unit sets scoring criteria based on the school's review standards, including dimensions such as the content quality, originality, and format compliance of the paper. The total score is calculated by weighting the scores of each dimension. The total score is automatically calculated based on the paper's content, format check results, and the teacher's review comments. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0034]

[0035] In the formula, H is the total score of the paper, J is the number of each scoring item, L is the total number of scoring items, and P is the total score of the paper.J For the score of the Jth rating item, B J The weight of the Jth rating item;

[0036] Scoring Result Feedback Unit: The system will provide the scoring results to the students. If the students do not meet the requirements for the defense, the system will prompt them to make corrections and indicate the issues that need to be corrected. The system will automatically generate a feedback report based on the scoring results, indicating the score for each scoring dimension and the corresponding modification suggestions.

[0037] Preferably, the review and scoring also include:

[0038] Scoring history record unit: The system records detailed information for each scoring session, including scoring time, scoring teacher, scoring time, teacher's identity information, score for each scoring session, and scoring dimensions;

[0039] Scoring Review Unit: After the teacher gives the score, the system automatically generates a review report, which includes the score, weight, final score and the teacher's reasoning for the score for each scoring item.

[0040] Preferably, the defense management module specifically includes:

[0041] The defense arrangement unit: The teacher generates a defense schedule based on the students' defense time and the defense group arrangement, and sends a notification to the students and defense group members. The defense schedule will include the defense time, location, defense group members, and the students' defense order.

[0042] Defense Question Setting Unit: Teachers set up defense questions in advance, and the system automatically recommends relevant questions based on the content of students' papers;

[0043] Defense Record Unit: During the defense process, the system records the defense process, including the defense questions, student answers, and teacher comments, for future reference. It automatically records the answer to each question, the time point, and the comments of the defense panel members.

[0044] Preferably, the defense management further includes:

[0045] The defense grading unit: Based on the defense and the student's performance, the defense panel members will grade the defense, automatically summarize the grades and generate a final grade report;

[0046] Grade Update Unit: After the defense grades are determined, the unit updates the student's final grades and provides the student with a final grade report. It also provides a grade modification function for administrators to verify and adjust. Based on the defense grades and thesis grades, the unit generates the final graduation grade report and records it in the student's file.

[0047] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows:

[0048] This invention proposes to automate the processes of login, plagiarism detection, format detection, and scoring, thereby improving work efficiency, reducing the burden on teachers, ensuring academic integrity, ensuring fairness and transparency through real-time feedback mechanisms and scoring history records, ensuring a smooth defense process through comprehensive defense management, and enhancing system controllability and security through information security and operational traceability, thus greatly optimizing the thesis management process. Attached Figure Description

[0049] Figure 1 This is a system framework diagram of the present invention;

[0050] Figure 2 This is a system framework diagram of the plagiarism detection and format detection module in this invention. Detailed Implementation

[0051] The following description is intended to disclose the invention and enable those skilled in the art to implement it. The preferred embodiments described below are merely examples, and other obvious variations will occur to those skilled in the art.

[0052] Reference Figure 1 As shown, the graduation thesis management system includes: a login and authentication module: used by teachers to log in to the system and view the status of students' submitted theses, including input functions for account, password and verification code;

[0053] Thesis Management Module: Used by teachers to review theses and provide suggestions for revision, guiding students to submit revised documents;

[0054] Plagiarism Detection and Formatting Module: Used to view and review plagiarism reports submitted by students, establish a paper formatting check model, obtain the result of whether the paper is qualified based on the output of the model, if qualified, output to the review and scoring module for scoring, if unqualified, mark and require the paper to be corrected for formatting errors.

[0055] Review and scoring module: Used by teachers to score students' graduation projects, automatically calculate the total score based on the thesis scoring formula, and determine whether students meet the defense requirements;

[0056] The defense management module is used to set up defense information, assign defense groups, set online defense questions, evaluate defense scores, and obtain final scores.

[0057] The login and authentication module specifically includes:

[0058] Login information input unit: Teachers enter their account, password and verification code on the login page. The system checks whether the account entered by the teacher exists in the database and compares the entered password with the password stored in the database.

[0059] Verification code verification unit: The system checks whether the input verification code is consistent with the generated verification code. If the account, password and verification code are all verified, the system allows the teacher to enter the system and view the status of the student's submitted paper.

[0060] Login information recording unit: Records teachers' login time and IP address information to ensure system security and operation traceability;

[0061] By introducing CAPTCHA verification and login information recording units, the system's security has been enhanced. By comparing account passwords with those in the database, the accuracy of identity verification is ensured, preventing unauthorized access. At the same time, recording teachers' login information and IP addresses provides assurance for operational traceability.

[0062] The thesis management module specifically includes:

[0063] Paper List Viewing Unit: After logging into the system, teachers can access the paper management module to view a list of all submitted papers by students and sort the papers by submission time and status.

[0064] Student paper selection unit: Teachers select students' papers for review and view the basic information of the papers, including the student's name, student ID, paper title and submission time.

[0065] Paper reading unit: Teachers browse the full text of the papers submitted by students online, add annotations and suggestions for revision, mark the problematic parts, and provide suggestions for improvement. After completing the review, the teacher will provide feedback on the revision suggestions to the students. When the paper content meets the requirements, the teacher marks the paper as completed.

[0066] By introducing CAPTCHA verification and login information recording units, the system's security has been enhanced. By comparing account passwords with those in the database, the accuracy of identity verification is ensured, preventing unauthorized access. At the same time, recording teachers' login information and IP addresses provides assurance for operational traceability.

[0067] Reference Figure 2 As shown, the plagiarism detection and formatting check module specifically includes:

[0068] Plagiarism Report Acquisition Unit: The system receives papers submitted by students, processes them through the plagiarism detection system, and automatically generates a plagiarism report. The report includes the duplication rate, similar parts, and information on the sources of duplication.

[0069] Format detection model generation unit: Based on the school's paper format requirements, a paper format check and scoring model is established to automatically detect whether the paper meets these format requirements;

[0070] Formatting check and feedback unit: The formatting of student-submitted papers is checked, including heading format, paragraph alignment, margins, line spacing, and reference format.

[0071] If the paper format meets the requirements, the system returns a qualified status; if a format problem is found, the system identifies the erroneous part and provides feedback to the student.

[0072] A plagiarism report acquisition and format detection model generation unit has been introduced. Through automated plagiarism detection and format detection, the originality and format compliance of the paper are ensured. This module improves the standardization of students' papers by conducting detailed format checks and provides real-time feedback on unqualified papers, ensuring high-quality paper submissions.

[0073] The plagiarism detection and format checking module also includes:

[0074] Acceptance judgment unit: After the paper format check and plagiarism review, the system judges whether the paper meets the submission requirements and sets a plagiarism rate threshold. If the plagiarism rate exceeds the threshold, the system marks it as unacceptable and prompts the student to make corrections. If the plagiarism rate is less than the threshold and the format meets the requirements, the paper is marked as acceptable and enters the review and scoring module.

[0075] Feedback and Revision Guidance Unit: The system sends plagiarism reports and format detection results to students, reminds them to revise problems in their papers, automatically updates the paper's status based on the plagiarism and format detection results, and records all detection results;

[0076] The system introduces a pass / fail judgment unit, which can automatically determine the pass / fail status of papers based on plagiarism rate and format detection results, and provide modification suggestions. The system provides timely feedback to students, avoiding the tedious process of repeated revisions and improving the efficiency and accuracy of paper review.

[0077] A paper format checking and scoring model is established based on the school's paper format requirements to automatically detect whether the paper meets these requirements, specifically including:

[0078] The formula for the paper format check scoring model is as follows:

[0079]

[0080] In the formula, S is the total format score of the paper, n is the total number of format items in the paper, i represents the i-th format item currently being checked, and f i Let f be the scoring function for the i-th format item, where f is the score for the i-th format item if it meets the requirements. i The value is 1, the i-th format item does not meet the requirements, f i The value is 0;

[0081] Based on the school's thesis format requirements, a thesis format checking and scoring model was established. The model automatically checks the thesis format, and its formula effectively improves the automation level of format review, reduces manual intervention, and ensures the uniformity of thesis format.

[0082] The review and scoring module specifically includes:

[0083] The scoring criteria setting unit sets scoring criteria based on the school's review standards, including dimensions such as the content quality, originality, and format compliance of the paper. The total score is calculated by weighting the scores of each dimension. The total score is automatically calculated based on the paper's content, format check results, and the teacher's review comments. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0084]

[0085] In the formula, H is the total score of the paper, J is the number of each scoring item, L is the total number of scoring items, and P is the total score of the paper. J For the score of the Jth rating item, B J The weight of the Jth rating item;

[0086] Scoring Result Feedback Unit: The system will provide the scoring results to the students. If the students do not meet the requirements for the defense, the system will prompt them to make corrections and indicate the issues that need to be corrected. The system will automatically generate a feedback report based on the scoring results, indicating the score for each scoring dimension and the corresponding modification suggestions.

[0087] The scoring criteria setting unit scores students based on the school's specific evaluation standards and automatically calculates the total score. This module not only improves the accuracy and fairness of the scoring but also ensures the transparency and traceability of each scoring process through the scoring history recording unit.

[0088] The review and scoring also include:

[0089] Scoring history record unit: The system records detailed information for each scoring session, including scoring time, scoring teacher, scoring time, teacher's identity information, score for each scoring session, and scoring dimensions;

[0090] Scoring Review Unit: After the teacher gives the score, the system automatically generates a review report, which includes the score, weight, final score and the teacher's reasoning for the score for each scoring item.

[0091] The defense management module specifically includes:

[0092] The defense arrangement unit: The teacher generates a defense schedule based on the students' defense time and the defense group arrangement, and sends a notification to the students and defense group members. The defense schedule will include the defense time, location, defense group members, and the order in which the students will defend.

[0093] Defense Question Setting Unit: Teachers set up defense questions in advance, and the system automatically recommends relevant questions based on the content of students' papers;

[0094] Defense Record Unit: During the defense process, the system records the defense process, including the defense questions, student answers, and teacher comments, for future reference. It automatically records the answer to each question, the time point, and the comments of the defense panel members.

[0095] The design of the defense arrangement unit and the defense question setting unit improves the efficiency of the defense process. By setting defense questions in advance and automatically generating defense arrangements, the orderly conduct of the defense is ensured. In addition, the defense recording unit provides a complete basis for subsequent review and grade evaluation by recording each question and answer in detail.

[0096] Thesis defense management also includes:

[0097] The defense grading unit: Based on the defense and the student's performance, the defense panel members will grade the defense, automatically summarize the grades and generate a final grade report;

[0098] Grade Update Unit: After the defense grades are determined, the student's final grades are updated and the final grade report is provided to the student. At the same time, the grade modification function is provided for administrators to verify and adjust. Based on the defense grades and thesis grades, the final graduation grade report is generated and recorded in the student's file.

[0099] Based on the defense and student performance, the defense grade is automatically determined and a final grade report is generated. The system automatically summarizes the grades and provides a grade modification function, so that the defense grade and the thesis grade are combined to generate the final graduation grade report, ensuring the transparency and accuracy of the grades.

[0100] In summary, the advantages of this invention are as follows:

[0101] The system automates the processes of login, plagiarism checking, format detection, and grading, reducing teachers' workload, saving time, and greatly improving management efficiency.

[0102] The system integrates a plagiarism detection module, automatically generates plagiarism reports and marks the duplicated parts, helping teachers detect whether papers are plagiarized and ensuring academic integrity.

[0103] The system can provide timely feedback on plagiarism check results, formatting issues, thesis review comments, and defense grades, enabling students to quickly understand the status of their thesis and make revisions, avoiding the tedious process of repeated submissions and modifications.

[0104] The system automatically calculates the total score of the paper and reviews the paper based on the set scoring criteria, ensuring the fairness and transparency of the scoring process. At the same time, the scoring history and review mechanism can effectively avoid human error in the scoring process.

[0105] The system provides functions such as defense arrangement, question setting and recording to ensure the smoothness and completeness of the defense process. It can generate a detailed defense report for each student to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the defense grades.

[0106] The system records login information to ensure security and can trace teachers' operation records, effectively improving the system's controllability and security.

[0107] The foregoing has shown and described the basic principles, main features, and advantages of the present invention. Those skilled in the art should understand that the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. The embodiments and descriptions in the specification are merely principles of the invention. Various changes and modifications can be made to the invention without departing from its spirit and scope, and all such changes and modifications fall within the scope of the claimed invention. The scope of protection claimed by the appended claims and their equivalents is defined.

Claims

1. A graduation thesis management system, characterized in that, include: Login and authentication module: Used for teachers to log in to the system and view the status of students' submitted papers, including input functions for account, password and verification code; Thesis Management Module: Used by teachers to review theses and provide suggestions for revision, guiding students to submit revised documents; Plagiarism Detection and Formatting Module: Used to view and review plagiarism reports submitted by students, establish a paper formatting check model, obtain the result of whether the paper is qualified based on the output of the model, if qualified, output to the review and scoring module for scoring, if unqualified, mark and require the paper to be corrected for formatting errors. Review and scoring module: Used by teachers to score students' graduation projects, automatically calculate the total score based on the thesis scoring formula, and determine whether students meet the defense requirements; The defense management module is used to set up defense information, assign defense groups, set online defense questions, evaluate defense scores, and obtain final scores.

2. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The login and authentication module specifically includes: Login information input unit: Teachers enter their account, password and verification code on the login page. The system checks whether the account entered by the teacher exists in the database and compares the entered password with the password stored in the database. Verification code verification unit: The system checks whether the input verification code is consistent with the generated verification code. If the account, password and verification code are all verified, the system allows the teacher to enter the system and view the status of the student's submitted paper. Login Information Recording Unit: Records teachers' login time and IP address information to ensure system security and operation traceability.

3. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 2, characterized in that, The paper management module specifically includes: Paper List Viewing Unit: After logging into the system, teachers can access the paper management module to view a list of all submitted papers by students and sort the papers by submission time and status. Student paper selection unit: Teachers select students' papers for review and view the basic information of the papers, including the student's name, student ID, paper title and submission time. Paper reading unit: Teachers browse the full text of students' submitted papers online, add annotations and suggestions for revision, mark the problematic parts, and provide feedback on the revisions. When the paper content meets the requirements, the teacher marks the paper as completed.

4. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 3, characterized in that, The plagiarism detection and format checking module specifically includes: Plagiarism Report Acquisition Unit: The system receives papers submitted by students, performs plagiarism checks through the plagiarism detection system, and automatically generates a plagiarism report. The report includes the duplication rate, similar parts, and information on the sources of duplication. Format detection model generation unit: Based on the school's paper format requirements, a paper format check and scoring model is established to automatically detect whether the paper meets these format requirements; Formatting check and feedback unit: performs format checks on student-submitted papers, including title format, paragraph alignment, margins, line spacing, and reference format; If the paper format meets the requirements, the system returns a qualified status. If a formatting problem is found, the system identifies the erroneous part and provides feedback to the student.

5. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The plagiarism detection and format checking module also includes: Acceptance judgment unit: After the paper format check and plagiarism review, the system judges whether the paper meets the submission requirements and sets a plagiarism rate threshold. If the plagiarism rate exceeds the threshold, the system marks it as unacceptable and prompts the student to make corrections. If the plagiarism rate is less than the threshold and the format meets the requirements, the paper is marked as acceptable and enters the review and scoring module. Feedback and Revision Guidance Unit: The system sends plagiarism reports and formatting detection results to students, reminds them to revise problems in their papers, automatically updates the paper's status based on the plagiarism and formatting detection results, and records all detection results.

6. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 4, characterized in that, The paper format checking and scoring model is established based on the school's paper format requirements to automatically detect whether the paper meets these specific format requirements. include: The formula for the paper format check scoring model is as follows: In the formula, S is the total format score of the paper, n is the total number of format items in the paper, i represents the i-th format item currently being checked, and f i Let f be the scoring function for the i-th format item, where f is the score for the i-th format item if it meets the requirements. i The value is 1, the i-th format item does not meet the requirements, f i The value is 0.

7. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The review and scoring module specifically includes: The scoring criteria setting unit sets scoring criteria based on the school's review standards, including dimensions such as the content quality, originality, and format compliance of the paper. The total score is calculated by weighting the scores of each dimension. The total score is automatically calculated based on the paper's content, format check results, and the teacher's review comments. The calculation formula is as follows: In the formula, H is the total score of the paper, J is the number of each scoring item, L is the total number of scoring items, and P is the total score of the paper. J For the score of the Jth rating item, B J The weight of the Jth rating item; Scoring Result Feedback Unit: The system will provide the scoring results to the students. If the students do not meet the requirements for the defense, the system will prompt them to make corrections and indicate the issues that need to be corrected. The system will automatically generate a feedback report based on the scoring results, indicating the score for each scoring dimension and the corresponding modification suggestions.

8. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 7, characterized in that, The review and scoring also include: Scoring history record unit: The system records detailed information for each scoring session, including scoring time, scoring teacher, scoring time, teacher's identity information, score for each scoring session, and scoring dimensions; Scoring Review Unit: After the teacher gives the score, the system automatically generates a review report, which includes the score, weight, final score and the teacher's reasoning for the score for each scoring item.

9. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The defense management module specifically includes: The defense arrangement unit: The teacher generates a defense schedule based on the students' defense time and the defense group arrangement, and sends a notification to the students and defense group members. The defense schedule will include the defense time, location, defense group members, and the students' defense order. Defense Question Setting Unit: Teachers set up defense questions in advance, and the system automatically recommends relevant questions based on the content of students' papers; Defense Record Unit: During the defense process, the system records the defense process, including the defense questions, student answers, and teacher comments, for future reference. It automatically records the answer to each question, the time point, and the comments of the defense panel members.

10. The graduation thesis management system according to claim 9, characterized in that, The defense management also includes: The defense grading unit: Based on the defense and the student's performance, the defense panel members will grade the defense, automatically summarize the grades and generate a final grade report; Grade Update Unit: After the defense grades are determined, the unit updates the student's final grades and provides the student with a final grade report. It also provides a grade modification function for administrators to verify and adjust. Based on the defense grades and thesis grades, the unit generates the final graduation grade report and records it in the student's file.

Images