An association target-based whole-process supervision method, system, device and storage medium

Abstract

The application provides a whole-process supervision method based on associated targets, comprising: converting accompanying supervision responsibility into a calculable and traceable binding relationship by establishing a supervision set of a first target and a second target, thereby fundamentally solving the problems of unverifiable supervision relationship and lack of technical constraints in the traditional management mode; achieving active and immediate discovery of abnormal behaviors such as off-duty and out-of-bound by real-time acquisition of position information of the first target and the second target and determination of spatial constraint abnormalities, thereby effectively overcoming the lag defect of abnormal identification caused by post-recording playback; forming whole-process closed-loop management and control from entry to departure by performing integrity verification of the supervision set at the off-site link and triggering retention constraints when the verification fails, thereby eliminating the safety hazards of personnel missing retention. Compared with the prior art, the application significantly improves the reliability, timeliness and completeness of the restricted area supervision. The system has the same beneficial effects.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of intelligent monitoring and security management technology, and in particular to a method, system, device and storage medium for full-process monitoring based on associated targets. Background Technology

[0002] In scenarios requiring strict area control, such as data center server rooms, classified laboratories, industrial production workshops, and kindergarten drop-off and pick-up areas, access control and behavior monitoring for personnel entering these areas are typically necessary. For example, in a server room maintenance scenario, external technicians must be accompanied by internal personnel throughout the entire process to prevent unauthorized operations, unauthorized entry into dangerous areas, or the theft of sensitive information.

[0003] Currently, existing technologies mainly employ the following methods for monitoring: Access control systems based on identity authentication verify personnel identities through card swiping, facial recognition, etc., controlling the opening and closing of entrances and exits. However, such systems only assess the entry permissions of individual personnel, failing to establish a binding relationship between visitors and accompanying persons, and cannot automatically verify whether all visitors have left upon departure. Video surveillance systems deploy cameras within the area for 24 / 7 recording for post-event review. However, video surveillance is a passive recording method, unable to determine in real time whether the distance between accompanying persons and visitors exceeds a reasonable range, nor can it automatically identify personnel crossing boundaries or lingering, resulting in a significant delay in anomaly detection. The manual escort method stipulates that visitors must be accompanied by internal personnel. However, manual escort is unreliable—accompanying personnel may leave the person being accompanied due to temporary matters, or when multiple visitors are dispersed, accompanying personnel cannot supervise them simultaneously. Especially during departure, accompanying personnel may forget or omit visitors, leading to visitors remaining in restricted areas and creating significant security risks.

[0004] In summary, existing technologies lack an automated control scheme capable of dynamically binding regulators and regulated entities, and of performing full-process spatial constraints and integrity verification on multiple related objectives. Therefore, how to establish regulated related objectives, conduct continuous full-process monitoring, and perform exit integrity verification are pressing technical problems that need to be solved in this field. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To address the problem of insufficient spatial constraints and integrity guarantees in existing technologies for multi-target end-to-end monitoring, this invention provides a method and system for end-to-end monitoring of associated targets, transforming individual monitoring into intra-group spatial constraints and inter-group integrity verification, thereby achieving fully automated closed-loop control of associated targets.

[0006] The purpose of this invention is to provide a full-process monitoring method based on associated targets; The technical solution provided by this invention is as follows: A full-process supervision method based on related objectives includes: In response to the entry of a first objective and at least one second objective, a regulatory set for the first objective and the second objective is established; The location information of the first target and the second target is acquired in real time. When the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, a spatial anomaly alarm is triggered. When any target leaves the field, the departure integrity check is performed on the regulatory set where the departing target is located, and the check result is obtained; if the check result is unsuccessful, the detention constraint is triggered.

[0007] Preferably, before establishing a regulatory set for the first target and the second target in response to the entry of the first target and at least one second target, the method further includes: Set the identity identifiers for the first target and the second target; Obtain the facial features of the first target and the second target.

[0008] Preferably, the step of establishing a regulatory set for the first target and the second target in response to the entry of the first target and at least one second target includes: Based on the identity and facial features of the first target and the second target, the first target is bound to at least one of the second targets to obtain the regulatory set.

[0009] Preferably, the spatial constraint anomaly includes: distance anomaly; The real-time acquisition of the location information of the first target and the second target, and the triggering of a spatial anomaly alarm when the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, includes: The relative position information of the first target and each of the second targets in the monitoring set is acquired in real time, and a distance anomaly alarm is triggered in response to any relative position being greater than or equal to a preset distance threshold.

[0010] Preferably, the spatial constraint anomaly further includes: boundary violation anomaly; The real-time acquisition of the location information of the first target and the second target, and the triggering of a spatial anomaly alarm when the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, includes: At least one electronic fence area is predefined, and access permissions for the electronic fence area corresponding to the identity identifier of each target are set for all targets within the monitored set. Real-time determination of whether the location information of any target within the monitored set exceeds the electronic fence area corresponding to the access permission; If the limit is exceeded, an out-of-bounds alarm will be triggered.

[0011] Preferably, the step of performing an exit integrity check on the monitored set when any target leaves the site, and obtaining the check result, includes: Identify the monitoring set where the departing target is located, and determine whether all targets within the monitoring set have reached the departure exit area; If all targets have reached the departure exit area, the verification result is "pass"; otherwise, the verification result is "fail".

[0012] Preferably, the triggering retention constraint includes: The access control device locks the departure exit area and triggers an exit anomaly alarm.

[0013] The second objective of this invention is to provide a full-process monitoring system based on associated targets; The technical solution provided by this invention is as follows: A full-process monitoring system based on associated targets, comprising: The entry management module is used to establish a regulatory set for the first target and the second target in response to the entry of a first target and at least one second target; The process monitoring module is used to acquire the location information of the first target and the second target in real time, and to trigger a spatial anomaly alarm when the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions. The departure verification module is used to perform departure integrity verification on the monitoring set where the departing target is located when any target leaves the site, and obtain the verification result; if the verification result is unsuccessful, the detention constraint is triggered.

[0014] The third objective of this invention is to provide a computer device; The technical solution provided by this invention is as follows: A computer device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the steps of any one of the methods for full-process monitoring based on associated targets.

[0015] A fourth objective of this invention is to provide a computer-readable storage medium; The technical solution provided by this invention is as follows: A computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of any of the methods for full-process monitoring based on associated targets.

[0016] This invention provides a full-process supervision method based on associated targets, comprising: establishing a supervision set for a first target and a second target, transforming the responsibility of accompanying supervision into a calculable and traceable binding relationship, fundamentally solving the problems of unverifiable supervision relationships and lack of technical constraints in traditional management models; acquiring the location information of the first and second targets in real time and determining spatial constraint anomalies, enabling proactive and immediate detection of abnormal behaviors such as escaping supervision and crossing boundaries, effectively overcoming the lag in anomaly identification caused by post-event video playback; and forming a closed-loop control system from entry to exit by performing integrity verification of the supervision set at the departure stage and triggering detention constraints when failure occurs, thus eliminating the safety hazards of personnel being missed or detained. Compared with existing technologies, this invention significantly improves the reliability, timeliness, and completeness of restricted area supervision.

[0017] The present invention also provides a full-process monitoring system based on associated targets. Since this system and the full-process monitoring method based on associated targets solve the same technical problems and belong to the same technical concept, they should have the same beneficial effects, and will not be described in detail here. Attached Figure Description

[0018] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0019] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a full-process monitoring method based on associated targets in an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a full-process monitoring system based on associated targets in an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 This is an internal structural diagram of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0020] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this application, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application will be clearly and completely described below. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of this application, and not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0021] like Figure 1 As shown, this embodiment of the invention provides a full-process monitoring method based on associated targets, including: S1. In response to the entry of the first objective and at least one second objective, establish a regulatory set for the first objective and the second objective; In this embodiment, when the system detects that a first target (e.g., an accompanying person) and at least one second target (e.g., a visiting maintenance personnel) have completed their entry actions, the system proactively establishes a "monitoring set" at the logical level, with the first target as the management core and including all relevant second targets. The establishment of this set signifies an explicit and traceable association between the first and second targets. Entry events are captured through an access control mechanism, triggering the set construction logic and dynamically generating a data structure in memory or a database. This structure clearly defines the regulatory relationships between the first target and each second target. This transforms the traditional, unverifiable "accompaniment responsibility" that relies on human initiative into a calculable, traceable, and verifiable digital constraint within the system. The regulatory relationship no longer depends on human memory or initiative but becomes a fundamental fact that the system forcibly maintains, providing a prerequisite for all subsequent automated regulatory logic.

[0022] S2. Acquire the location information of the first and second targets in real time. When the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, trigger a spatial anomaly alarm. In this embodiment, from the entry of the first target and the exit of the second target, the real-time location information of the first target and each of the second targets within the monitored set is continuously acquired in a periodic or event-driven manner. The acquisition method can be computer vision analysis, spatial positioning beacons, or any other technical means that can provide continuous coordinates. After obtaining the location information, the spatial relationship between the first target and the second target is dynamically calculated and determined. Specifically, the system will evaluate in real time whether the current spatial relationship meets the preset "spatial constraint anomaly conditions." These conditions can be characterized by any one or more spatial geometric relationship judgments, such as the distance between targets exceeding the allowable range, targets entering physical areas they should not enter, or the relative orientation relationship between targets violating preset rules. When the anomaly conditions are met, the system immediately triggers a spatial anomaly alarm.

[0023] In practical applications, spatial geometric algorithms can be used to perform real-time calculations on multi-dimensional coordinate data, and the calculation results can be matched with predefined anomaly criteria. If a match is successful, the alarm generation logic is triggered. Step S2 achieves a leap from "passive recording" to "active analysis." Behaviors such as absconding, unauthorized departure from the group, and accidental entry into dangerous areas during the monitoring process no longer need to be reviewed afterward. Instead, they can be automatically identified by the system and an alarm can be issued instantly, effectively solving the problem of delayed abnormal behavior identification.

[0024] S3. When any target leaves the field, the departure integrity check is performed on the regulatory set where the departing target is located, and the check result is obtained; if the check result is unsuccessful, the retention constraint is triggered.

[0025] In this embodiment, when any target, whether the first or second target, requests to leave or is identified in the exit area, it is not allowed to leave directly. Instead, the monitoring set to which the departing target belongs is first identified, and then the current status of all target members in that set is checked one by one to determine whether the entire set meets the condition of "allowing departure." This judgment process is called "departure integrity verification." The verification result has only two possibilities: pass or fail. If the verification result is pass (e.g., all targets in the set have arrived at the departure point simultaneously), normal departure is allowed; if the verification result is fail (e.g., some targets are still in the internal area and have not arrived at the departure point), "detention constraint" is immediately triggered. This constraint can manifest as preventing the current target's departure action (e.g., physical access control locking), issuing a detention alarm, or performing multiple operations simultaneously. Its working principle is: by maintaining the presence / departure status of each target in the monitoring set, executing set-level integrity judgment logic when a departure event occurs, and executing corresponding constraint restrictions based on the judgment result. Its technical effectiveness lies in fundamentally eliminating the safety hazard of "personnel being missed or left behind" due to negligence in inventory or personnel dispersion. Whether the first target forgets the second target or the second target delays leaving on their own, the system can intercept the anomaly and issue a mandatory notification at the last moment before departure, ensuring the rigid enforcement of the "enter and exit together" regulatory principle and forming a closed-loop safety system from establishing a regulatory relationship upon entry to verification upon departure.

[0026] Preferably, before establishing the regulatory set for the first objective and the second objective in response to the entry of the first objective and at least one second objective, the method further includes: Set up identity identifiers for the first and second targets; In this embodiment, before implementing the entry and group creation operation, the system pre-sets an identity identifier for each person who may enter the regulatory process and collects facial features. The identity identifier includes a unique identifier and a regulatory identity identifier. The unique identifier is a globally unique code (e.g., employee ID, national ID number, UUID) for each target within the system, used to distinguish different individuals at the database level, index personal files, and trace historical records. Once set, this identifier remains unchanged throughout its lifecycle. The regulatory identity identifier is a dynamically assigned category label based on the target's role in a specific regulatory scenario. In practical application, the first target's regulatory identity identifier is set as the regulatory subject, representing their responsibility to supervise, manage, and constrain others; the second target's regulatory identity identifier is set as the regulated subject, representing their passive role of accepting supervision and complying with spatial constraints. The unique identifier is used for identity indexing; the regulatory identity identifier is used to define their rights and obligations within the regulatory set. The unique identifier ensures the traceability and non-confusing nature of personnel identities, while the regulatory identity identifier realizes the explicit and systematic definition of regulatory roles. The combination of these two aspects enables the system to not only know "who has come," but also clearly know "who is in charge and who is being managed," providing a clear role basis for subsequent regulatory relationship binding, permission allocation, and anomaly detection.

[0027] Obtain the facial features of the first and second targets.

[0028] In this embodiment, facial features are a set of feature vectors extracted using deep learning algorithms after capturing a target's facial image with an image acquisition device (such as a high-definition camera). This feature vector uniquely represents a person's facial biometric information and is robust to different lighting conditions, angles, and expressions. Its working principle is as follows: an identity identifier determines the regulatory identity and unique identifier of each target, while facial features provide an unforgeable and tamper-proof internal biometric key.

[0029] It is important to note that the use of facial features is not limited to identity verification upon entry. The acquired facial feature vectors will be stored in the system's personnel feature database and repeatedly accessed throughout the entire monitoring process: During entry, the system compares the real-time captured facial features of the entering target with the database to confirm identity; during real-time monitoring, cameras deployed in various locations continuously capture facial information as the target moves within the area to determine their current location; during exit, facial feature matching confirms the identity of the departing target and performs a closed-loop verification with the entry identity record. Worker facial features serve as a "biometric key" throughout the entire process, not only unlocking the entrance but also acting as a visual anchor point to continuously maintain the mapping between target identity and spatial location. By pre-acquiring and storing facial features, the system establishes a biometric index that can be queried and compared at any time. This enables the system to upgrade from a passive response (verification only once upon entry) to continuous locking (identity can be identified at any time throughout the process), providing an indispensable identity anchoring foundation for subsequent real-time calculation of the relative positional distance between the "regulatory entity" and the "regulated entity", determining whether the "regulated entity" has crossed the boundary, and verifying whether it is the same person upon departure, etc.

[0030] Facial features are a set of feature vectors extracted using deep learning algorithms after capturing facial images of a target through image acquisition devices (such as high-definition cameras). This feature vector uniquely represents a person's facial biometric information and is robust to different lighting, angles, and expressions. Its working principle is as follows: an identity identifier determines the regulatory identity and unique identifier of each target, while facial features provide an unforgeable and tamper-proof internal biometric key. Together, they constitute the complete basis for the system to identify the target's identity and are stored in a personnel database for subsequent retrieval. Its technical effect is that it provides a reliable identity prerequisite for establishing a regulatory set. Without pre-set identity identifiers and biometric features, the system cannot distinguish which target is the primary target and which is the secondary target, nor can it ensure that the person entering is indeed the person. Through this preliminary step, subsequent "responding to entry" and "binding" operations have an accurate identity basis, avoiding security vulnerabilities such as impersonation and misidentification. At the same time, it also provides a prerequisite for subsequent judgments based on spatial constraints and abnormal conditions.

[0031] Preferably, in response to the entry of a first objective and at least one second objective, a regulatory set for the first objective and the second objective is established, including: Based on the identity and facial features of the first and second objectives, the first objective is bound to at least one second objective to obtain a regulatory set.

[0032] In this embodiment, when the first target and at least one second target complete the entry identification in the entrance area one after another or simultaneously, the system does not simply record their respective entry events, but performs an active and explicit logical binding operation based on the identity identifiers (including unique identifiers and regulatory identity identifiers) set by both and the facial features that have been verified in real time, thereby generating a structured regulatory set.

[0033] As one specific implementation method, the binding process includes: Step 1: Real-time Identity Verification and Role Confirmation. When the first target appears in the entrance recognition area, the system captures their current facial image using a high-definition camera, extracts the facial feature vector in real time, and performs a one-to-one or one-to-many comparison with the pre-stored facial feature database. Upon successful comparison, the system retrieves the corresponding identity record for the target, including: a unique identifier: confirming that the target is a registered person, "Zhang San"; and a supervisory identity identifier: confirming that Zhang San's supervisory identity label is "Supervisory Entity," indicating that they act as a supervisor in this supervisory process.

[0034] When the second target subsequently or simultaneously appears in the identification area, the system performs the same facial feature comparison process and retrieves its identity record. The system confirms that the second target's regulatory identity label is "regulated entity," indicating that it needs to be supervised in this process.

[0035] Step Two: Execution Logic of the Binding Operation. After confirming that the first target has the role of "regulatory entity" and the second target has the role of "regulated entity," the system triggers the binding logic. The "unique identifier" of the first target is used as the root node of the set, and the "unique identifier" of the second target is used as a leaf node, forming a one-to-one or one-to-many relationship through the set structure. The regulatory identity identifier determines which becomes the root node and which becomes the leaf node—targets with the "regulatory entity" label are automatically assigned root node status, and targets with the "regulated entity" label are automatically placed in the leaf node list. Simultaneously, facial features are bound to the corresponding identity identifier.

[0036] Step 3: Continuous Association of Facial Features. Throughout the subsequent end-to-end monitoring process (including process monitoring and exit verification), whenever a target is captured in any camera view, the system extracts its current facial features in real time and quickly matches them with the identity identifier of that monitoring set. For successfully matched targets, the system immediately determines which monitoring set they belong to, whether they are a monitoring entity or a monitored entity, and then invokes the corresponding monitoring logic (e.g., calculating the distance to the monitoring entity, determining if there has been any boundary-crossing behavior, etc.).

[0037] Through the aforementioned binding mechanism based on identity identifiers and facial features, this invention achieves the following technical effects: Digital instantiation of regulatory relationships, transforming them into explicit data structures—regulatory sets—that can be stored, queried, and verified within a computer system; Utilizing the regulatory identity identifiers of "regulatory subjects" and "regulated subjects," the system can automatically and accurately distinguish between supervisors and those being supervised within the set, without requiring manual specification. This role anchoring provides a clear logical starting point for subsequent distance anomaly judgment and out-of-bounds permission allocation; Full-process linkage of identity and location, using facial features as a continuously matching "biological key," enables the system to associate the real-time detected target with its identity within the regulatory set at any time and location throughout the entire regulatory process; A combination of dynamic and static elements: Unique identifiers provide static, permanent personnel indexing capabilities; regulatory identity identifiers provide scenario-based dynamic role assignment capabilities (the same person may play different roles in different regulatory sets); Facial features provide real-time identity verification capabilities throughout the entire process. The organic combination of these three elements makes the establishment of regulatory sets both accurate and flexible.

[0038] Preferably, spatial constraint anomalies include: distance anomalies; The system acquires the location information of the first and second targets in real time. When the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, a spatial anomaly alarm is triggered, including: The system acquires the relative position information of the first target and each second target within the monitored set in real time, and triggers a distance anomaly alarm when any relative position is greater than or equal to a preset distance threshold.

[0039] In this embodiment, the real-time position coordinates of the first target and each second target within the monitored set are continuously acquired, and the relative distances (e.g., Euclidean distance, Manhattan distance, etc.) between the first target and each second target are calculated. A distance threshold (e.g., 3 meters) is pre-set within the system, which can be adjusted according to the level of regulatory rigor. When the calculated relative distance between the first target and any second target is greater than or equal to this threshold, the system determines that a "distance anomaly" has occurred and triggers the corresponding distance anomaly alarm. In practical application, the coordinates of each target are continuously output through position sensors or visual positioning algorithms, and then a difference calculation is performed on each pair (first target, i-th second target) and compared with the threshold. This is a multi-path parallel real-time comparison process; any comparison branch triggering an exceedance will immediately drive the alarm generation logic.

[0040] Compared to existing technologies, this invention achieves precise quantitative detection of "absenteeism" behavior. Traditional accompaniment processes rely solely on human observation, while this solution quantifies the monitoring range into a clear distance range. As soon as a visitor exceeds this distance, the system will issue an alarm immediately, effectively avoiding the problem of monitoring failure due to negligence, distraction, or obstruction by the accompanying personnel, and ensuring that the monitoring distance is always controllable.

[0041] Preferably, spatial constraint anomalies also include: boundary out-of-bounds anomalies; The system acquires the location information of the first and second targets in real time. When the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, a spatial anomaly alarm is triggered, including: Predefine at least one electronic fence area and set access permissions for the electronic fence area corresponding to the identity of each target within the monitored set; Real-time determination of whether the location information of any target within the monitored set exceeds the electronic fence area corresponding to the access permission; If the limit is exceeded, an out-of-bounds alarm will be triggered.

[0042] In this embodiment, one or more virtual electronic fence areas are predefined on the geographic map of the monitored area. Each area can be a polygon, a circle, or other geometric shape, representing a physical space with a specific security level (e.g., a core equipment area, a high-voltage danger zone, or a prohibited area). Simultaneously, access permissions for each electronic fence area are configured for each target within the monitored set (including the first target and all second targets). These permissions are bound to the target's identity identifier. Permissions can be "Allow entry," "Prohibit entry," or "Time-restricted entry," etc. During real-time monitoring, the system continuously acquires the location coordinates of each target and determines whether these coordinates fall within a certain electronic fence area. Once it is found that the location coordinates of any target are within an electronic fence area where its permission is set to "Prohibit entry," an out-of-bounds anomaly is determined, and an out-of-bounds alarm is triggered. In practical applications, the physical space is discretized into multiple virtual areas with permission labels. The relationship between the target's location and the area is determined in real time using a point and polygon containment algorithm (such as ray casting), and then matched and adjudicated using a permission table.

[0043] Compared to existing technologies, this invention upgrades area control from physical barriers and manual supervision to automated, sophisticated digital fencing. By setting different access permissions for different targets, it significantly enhances the granularity of security management in confined spaces.

[0044] Preferably, when any target leaves the site, an exit integrity check is performed on the regulatory set to obtain the check result, including: Identify the regulatory set where the departing target is located, and determine whether all targets within the regulatory set have reached the departure exit area; If all targets have reached the exit area, the verification result is "pass"; otherwise, the verification result is "fail".

[0045] In this embodiment, when a target requesting to leave is detected in the exit area (e.g., through an exit identification device), the system first identifies the regulatory set to which the target belongs, for example, by querying the mapping relationship between the target's identity and the regulatory set. After obtaining the regulatory set, the system iterates through all target members within the set, checking whether the current location of each target is within the "departure exit area". The departure exit area can be a preset geographical range (e.g., a circular area within 1 meter in front of the exit gate) or a logical status marker. The integrity check result is "passed" only when the current location of every member in the set is determined to have reached the exit area; if any member has not yet reached the exit area (e.g., still inside the computer room), the check result is "failed".

[0046] Compared to existing technologies, this solution strictly guarantees the closed-loop management principle that all targets within the same monitoring set must leave simultaneously. Regardless of the number of people, the system can automatically and accurately verify whether everyone is present, avoiding omissions or errors caused by manual counting and eliminating the potential for delays due to personnel dispersion.

[0047] Preferably, the triggering of the detention constraint includes: The access control equipment is linked to lock the exit area and triggers an exit anomaly alarm.

[0048] In this embodiment, when the departure integrity verification fails, a detention constraint action is executed. First, a "lock" command is sent to the access control device governing the current departure exit area via a pre-established access control interface. This command causes the access control device to enter a prohibited state: the turnstile arm cannot be pushed, the electromagnetic lock remains engaged, and the red light illuminates, physically preventing any target personnel from leaving through the exit. Simultaneously, a departure anomaly alarm is triggered. This alarm can be issued via voice broadcast, audible and visual alarms, or message push notifications, alerting on-site personnel to the existence of incomplete departure constraints. This invention achieves an intelligent closed loop of "detecting anomalies and preventing dangerous behavior." The alarm is no longer just an information notification but is directly transformed into an inaccessible physical constraint, forcing relevant personnel to address the detention issue before leaving, greatly improving the enforceability and immediate effectiveness of security control.

[0049] In practical applications, the above-mentioned abnormal alarms can be presented in the form of interface pop-ups, audio and visual prompts, data logging, or push notifications to designated terminals.

[0050] This invention establishes a closed-loop monitoring system covering the entire process from entry to exit by creating a regulatory set for the first and second objectives, real-time monitoring of spatial constraint anomalies triggering alarms, and performing integrity checks and triggering detention constraints upon departure. By pre-setting identity identifiers and collecting facial features, it provides foundational data support for subsequent identity differentiation, role identification, and continuous tracking. Binding the first and second objectives to a regulatory set based on identity identifiers and facial features achieves digital instantiation of regulatory relationships and systematic anchoring of supervisory / supervised roles. By acquiring the relative position of the first objective and each second objective in real time, when any... When the relative distance exceeds a preset threshold, a distance anomaly alarm is triggered, achieving quantitative detection and immediate alarm for "uncontrolled" behavior. By predefining electronic fence areas and assigning access permissions corresponding to identity identifiers to each target within the set, real-time boundary crossing is detected and alarms are triggered, achieving role-based refined area control. By identifying the monitored set to which the departing target belongs and determining whether all targets within the set have reached the exit area, the integrity of departures within the same set is ensured. When a loitering constraint is triggered, the access control locks the exit and issues a departure anomaly alarm, transforming logical judgment into physical execution, forming an insurmountable security closed loop. Compared to existing technologies, this invention significantly improves the reliability, timeliness, and completeness of restricted area monitoring.

[0051] like Figure 2 As shown, this embodiment of the invention provides a full-process monitoring system based on associated targets, including: The entry management module is used to establish a regulatory set for the first objective and the second objective in response to the entry of the first objective and at least one second objective. The process monitoring module is used to acquire the location information of the first and second targets in real time. When the location information meets the spatial constraint abnormal conditions, a spatial abnormality alarm is triggered. The departure verification module is used to perform departure integrity verification on the regulatory set where the departing target is located when any target leaves the site, and obtain the verification result; if the verification result is unsuccessful, the detention constraint is triggered.

[0052] For specific limitations regarding a whole-process monitoring system based on associated targets, please refer to the limitations of a whole-process monitoring method based on associated targets mentioned above, which will not be repeated here. Each module in the aforementioned whole-process monitoring system based on associated targets can be implemented entirely or partially through software, hardware, or a combination thereof. These modules can be embedded in or independent of the processor in a computer device in hardware form, or stored in the memory of a computer device in software form, so that the processor can call and execute the corresponding operations of each module.

[0053] like Figure 3As shown, in one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the computer program, it performs the following steps: In response to the entry of the first objective and at least one second objective, establish a regulatory set for the first objective and the second objective; The location information of the first and second targets is acquired in real time. When the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, a spatial anomaly alarm is triggered. When any target leaves the field, the departure integrity check is performed on the regulatory set to which the departing target belongs, and the check result is obtained; if the check result is unsuccessful, the retention constraint is triggered.

[0054] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 3 The structure shown is merely a block diagram of a portion of the structure related to the present application and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the present application is applied. Specific computer devices may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.

[0055] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, performs the following steps: In response to the entry of the first objective and at least one second objective, establish a regulatory set for the first objective and the second objective; The location information of the first and second targets is acquired in real time. When the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, a spatial anomaly alarm is triggered. When any target leaves the field, the departure integrity check is performed on the regulatory set to which the departing target belongs, and the check result is obtained; if the check result is unsuccessful, the retention constraint is triggered.

[0056] In the embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed methods and systems can be implemented in other ways. The system embodiments described above are merely illustrative. For example, the division of modules is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods, such as: multiple modules or components can be combined, or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. In addition, the coupling, direct coupling, or communication connection between the various components shown or discussed can be through some interfaces, indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or modules, and can be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0057] Furthermore, in the various embodiments of the present invention, each functional module can be fully integrated into a processor, or each module can be a separate device, or two or more modules can be integrated into a device; each functional module in the various embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in hardware or in the form of hardware plus software functional units.

[0058] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps of the above method embodiments can be implemented by program instructions and related hardware. The aforementioned program instructions can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the program instructions are executed, they perform the steps of the above method embodiments. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media that can store program code, such as mobile storage devices, read-only memory (ROM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0059] It should be understood that the use of terms such as "system," "apparatus," "unit," and / or "module" in this application is only applicable to distinguishing different components, elements, parts, sections, or assemblies at different levels. However, if other terms can achieve the same purpose, they may be replaced by other expressions.

[0060] As indicated in this application and claims, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the words "a," "an," "a," and / or "the" are not specifically singular and may include the plural. Generally, the terms "comprising" and "including" only indicate the inclusion of expressly identified steps and elements, which do not constitute an exclusive list, and the method or apparatus may also include other steps or elements. An element defined by the phrase "comprising an..." does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, product, or apparatus that includes the element.

[0061] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. In the description of this application, "a plurality of" or "several" means two or more, unless otherwise explicitly specified.

[0062] If a flowchart is used in this application, it is used to illustrate the operations performed by the system according to embodiments of this application. It should be understood that the preceding or following operations are not necessarily performed in exact order. Instead, the steps can be processed in reverse order or simultaneously. Furthermore, other operations can be added to these processes, or one or more steps can be removed from them.

[0063] The above description of the disclosed embodiments enables those skilled in the art to make or use the invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the invention is not to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims

1. A method for whole-process supervision based on associated targets, characterized in that, include: In response to the entry of a first objective and at least one second objective, a regulatory set for the first objective and at least one second objective is established; The location information of the first target and the second target is acquired in real time. When the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, a spatial anomaly alarm is triggered. When any target leaves the field, the departure integrity check is performed on the regulatory set where the departing target is located, and the check result is obtained; if the check result is unsuccessful, the detention constraint is triggered.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein, Prior to establishing the regulatory set for the first target and at least one second target in response to their entry, the method further includes: Set the identity identifiers for the first target and the second target; Obtain the facial features of the first target and the second target.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein, The provision regarding the establishment of a regulatory set for the first target and the second target in response to the entry of a first target and at least one second target includes: Based on the identity and facial features of the first target and the second target, the first target is bound to at least one of the second targets to obtain the regulatory set.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein, The spatial constraint anomalies include: distance anomalies; The real-time acquisition of the location information of the first target and the second target, and the triggering of a spatial anomaly alarm when the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, includes: The relative position information of the first target and each of the second targets in the monitoring set is acquired in real time, and a distance anomaly alarm is triggered in response to any relative position being greater than or equal to a preset distance threshold.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein, The spatial constraint anomalies also include: boundary out-of-bounds anomalies; The real-time acquisition of the location information of the first target and the second target, and the triggering of a spatial anomaly alarm when the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions, includes: At least one electronic fence area is predefined, and access permissions for the electronic fence area corresponding to the identity identifier of each target are set for all targets within the monitored set. Real-time determination of whether the location information of any target within the monitored set exceeds the electronic fence area corresponding to the access permission; If the limit is exceeded, an out-of-bounds alarm will be triggered.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein, When any target leaves the field, the leave integrity verification is performed on the monitoring set to which the leaving target belongs, and the verification result is obtained, including: Identify the monitoring set where the departing target is located, and determine whether all targets within the monitoring set have reached the departure exit area; If all targets have reached the exit area, the verification result is "pass"; otherwise, the verification result is "fail".

7. The full-process supervision method based on associated targets according to any one of claims 1-6, characterized in that, The triggering retention constraint includes: The access control device locks the departure exit area and triggers an exit anomaly alarm.

8. A full-process supervision system based on an associated target, characterized by, include: The entry management module is used to establish a regulatory set for the first target and the second target in response to the entry of a first target and at least one second target; The process monitoring module is used to acquire the location information of the first target and the second target in real time, and to trigger a spatial anomaly alarm when the location information meets the spatial constraint anomaly conditions. The departure verification module is used to perform departure integrity verification on the monitoring set where the departing target is located when any target leaves the site, and obtain the verification result; if the verification result is unsuccessful, the detention constraint is triggered.

9. A computer device, comprising: It includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the steps of the end-to-end monitoring method based on any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the end-to-end monitoring method based on associated targets as described in any one of claims 1-7.

Images