An examination method in a helicopter ground inspection maintenance teaching process

Abstract

The application provides an examination method in a helicopter ground inspection maintenance teaching process, the examination content is divided into a hierarchical structure of a machine type-station-site-inspection point, for each inspection point, the six dimensions of an inspection point name, an inspection point position, an inspection method, an inspection tool, an inspection action and an inspection state are needed, and one dimension of an inspection sequence is additionally increased in the whole, a total of seven dimensions are used to examine the mastering situation of students, the examination standard is clear and objective, and the problems of strong subjectivity and large teacher workload caused by the fact that the existing technology mainly relies on manual scoring by teachers and the scoring has certain subjectivity and leads to scoring errors are solved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of helicopter teaching and assessment technology, and in particular to an assessment method for helicopter ground inspection and maintenance teaching. Background Technology

[0002] In the current helicopter ground inspection and maintenance teaching process, when the teacher has completed the teaching work and the students need to conduct practical assessments on a real helicopter, the teacher needs to accompany the students, observe their operation, and make paper records of their operation process and score them.

[0003] Problems and causes of existing technologies: 1. Due to the current technological state, the assessment mainly relies on teachers' manual scoring, which is subjective and carries the risk of scoring errors; 2. Due to the current technological limitations, student assessments require teacher accompaniment, resulting in an extremely heavy workload for teachers. 3. In some helicopter models, certain key inspection areas, such as the cockpit and air intake, are not spacious enough to accommodate two people, which affects the teacher's ability to observe the operation from the side of the students. 4. Apart from the teacher's paper records, there is no other evidence left for the entire student assessment process, which makes it difficult to trace back and analyze the data. 5. After the students complete the assessment, the teachers still need to manually input the information from the paper scoring sheets into the computer, which involves a certain amount of work. 6. The overall assessment results are not currently statistically analyzed, such as the students' mastery of the material at each station or checkpoint. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To overcome the shortcomings of existing technologies, this invention provides an assessment method for helicopter ground inspection and maintenance teaching, which solves the problems of existing technologies mainly relying on manual scoring by teachers, which leads to scoring errors due to a certain degree of subjectivity, and also results in a heavy workload for teachers.

[0005] The technical solution adopted by this invention to solve its technical problem is: an assessment method for helicopter ground inspection and maintenance teaching process, the assessment method is as follows: S1: In the assessment preparation stage, the instructor will prepare the test questions to be assessed, determine the score weight of each test question, determine the scoring criteria, complete the editing on the computer, and import it into the smart wearable terminal. After that, the students will wear the smart wearable terminal and input the basic information to be assessed, such as name, major, class group, etc., through voice recognition, manual input, etc., and select the inspection model and inspection position. S2: Trainee Assessment Phase. After entering the assessment station, the student verbally states the name of the station. The inspection process at each checkpoint is as follows: S2.1 The student describes the names of the stations / checkpoints that need to be executed in the current step. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description order is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.2 The intelligent wearable terminal system determines whether the station / checkpoint name described by the student in step 1 is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.3 Students face the current station / checkpoint, take a photo with a smart wearable terminal, and confirm that the photo meets the requirements of the station / checkpoint. The system uses image recognition to determine whether the photo taken by the student meets the characteristics of the station / checkpoint described in step 2. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.4 Students describe the inspection method at the current site / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.5. The student describes the inspection tools needed for the current site / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.6 The student picks up the inspection tool described in step 5, takes a picture with the smart wearable terminal, and confirms that the picture taken meets the requirements of the tool used at the current station / checkpoint. The system uses image recognition to determine whether the picture taken by the student meets the tool characteristics described in step 4. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.7 Students use the selected tools to perform inspection operations. The smart wearable terminal uses motion recognition to determine whether the current inspection action meets the operation requirements of the current station / inspection point. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.8 Students describe the inspection results of the current station / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system automatically matches the preset station / checkpoint status. If it matches, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. Repeat steps 1-8 until all steps are completed. The smart wearable terminal system accumulates all scores and divides them by the full score to obtain the score for this assessment. S3: During the grade review stage, if a student has any objection to the assessment score, the teacher can manually confirm it by watching the student's operation video. If there are any omissions or errors in the judgment, the teacher can change the student's assessment score.

[0006] Ideally, after completing the assessment tasks for all students, the teacher imports the data from the smart wearable terminal into the computer system. The system automatically organizes and exports the student assessment scores according to the teacher's requirements. It also provides data from different dimensions for the teacher's reference.

[0007] The beneficial effects of this invention are as follows: 1. The judgment criteria are sufficient and clear, avoiding subjective scoring by teachers, reducing scoring errors, and improving the reliability of the assessment results; 2. By using smart wearable terminals to replace the traditional teacher-accompanied scoring, the efficiency of assessment is improved, while the workload of teachers is reduced. 3. The entire assessment process will be recorded using a smart wearable device, which will facilitate the tracking and analysis of the assessment process in the future. If students have any objections to the assessment results, there will be clear grounds for judgment.

[0008] 4. The system automatically analyzes and judges the assessment results, which can optimize teachers' teaching focus. Attached Figure Description

[0009] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of the preparation stage of the present invention; Figure 2 This is a flowchart of the student assessment stage of the present invention: Detailed Implementation

[0010] The present invention will now be described in further detail with reference to the embodiments and accompanying drawings, so that those skilled in the art can implement it based on the description.

[0011] Exemplary embodiments will now be described in detail, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. When the following description relates to the drawings, unless otherwise indicated, the same numerals in different drawings denote the same or similar elements. The embodiments described in the following exemplary embodiments do not represent all embodiments consistent with the present invention. Rather, they are merely examples of apparatuses and methods consistent with some aspects of the invention as detailed in the appended claims.

[0012] The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. The singular forms “a,” “the,” and “the” used in this invention and the appended claims are also intended to include the plural forms unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It should also be understood that the term “and / or” as used herein refers to and includes any or all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.

[0013] It should be understood that although the terms first, second, third, etc., may be used in this invention to describe various information, this information should not be limited to these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish information of the same type from one another. Depending on the context, the word "if" as used herein can be interpreted as "when," "when," or "in response to a determination."

[0014] An assessment method for helicopter ground inspection and maintenance training, such as Figure 1-2 As shown: The assessment method is as follows: S1: In the assessment preparation stage, the instructor will prepare the test questions to be assessed, determine the score weight of each test question, determine the scoring criteria, complete the editing on the computer, and import it into the smart wearable terminal. After that, the students will wear the smart wearable terminal and input the basic information to be assessed, such as name, major, class group, etc., through voice recognition, manual input, etc., and select the inspection model and inspection position. S2: Trainee Assessment Phase. After entering the assessment station, the student verbally states the name of the station. The inspection process at each checkpoint is as follows: S2.1 The student describes the names of the stations / checkpoints that need to be executed in the current step. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description order is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.2 The intelligent wearable terminal system determines whether the station / checkpoint name described by the student in step 1 is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.3 Students face the current station / checkpoint, take a photo with a smart wearable terminal, and confirm that the photo meets the requirements of the station / checkpoint. The system uses image recognition to determine whether the photo taken by the student meets the characteristics of the station / checkpoint described in step 2. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.4 Students describe the inspection method at the current site / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.5. The student describes the inspection tools needed for the current site / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.6 The student picks up the inspection tool described in step 5, takes a picture with the smart wearable terminal, and confirms that the picture taken meets the requirements of the tool used at the current station / checkpoint. The system uses image recognition to determine whether the picture taken by the student meets the tool characteristics described in step 4. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.7 Students use the selected tools to perform inspection operations. The smart wearable terminal uses motion recognition to determine whether the current inspection action meets the operation requirements of the current station / inspection point. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.8 Students describe the inspection results of the current station / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system automatically matches the preset station / checkpoint status. If it matches, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. Repeat steps 1-8 until all steps are completed. The intelligent wearable terminal system accumulates all scores and divides by the maximum score to obtain the final score for this assessment. S3: During the grade review stage, if a student has any objection to the assessment score, the teacher can manually confirm it by watching the student's operation video. If there are any omissions or errors in the judgment, the teacher can change the student's assessment score.

[0015] Furthermore, after completing the assessment tasks for all students, teachers import the data from the smart wearable terminal into the computer system. The system automatically organizes and exports the student assessment scores according to the teacher's requirements. It also provides data from different dimensions for the teacher's reference.

[0016] In summary, this invention divides the assessment content into a hierarchical structure of machine type, station, site, and checkpoint. For each checkpoint, the assessment is conducted through six dimensions: checkpoint name, checkpoint location, inspection method, inspection tools, inspection actions, and inspection status. An additional dimension, the inspection order, is added to the overall assessment, resulting in a total of seven dimensions for evaluating students' mastery. The assessment criteria are clear and objective, solving the problems of existing technologies that mainly rely on teachers' manual scoring, which is subject to subjectivity and leads to scoring errors, as well as the problems of strong subjectivity and heavy workload for teachers.

[0017] During the assessment process of this invention, students wear smart wearable terminals. The smart wearable terminals analyze the students' mastery based on speech recognition, image recognition, gesture recognition, and related algorithms, and give scores based on relevant weights. No teacher accompaniment is required, which solves the problem of heavy workload for teachers.

[0018] During the assessment process of this invention, students wear smart wearable terminals, which do not affect them in some confined spaces such as the cockpit and air intake, thus solving the problem that confined spaces are not convenient for assessment using current technologies.

[0019] During the assessment process of this invention, students wear smart wearable terminals. While performing analysis, the smart wearable terminals also record the entire assessment process. When students have objections to their current scores, teachers can review the video to confirm the students' understanding and adjust the scores accordingly. Students can also watch their own operation videos to analyze problems in their operation process. This solves the problem of the lack of evidence and the inconvenience of retrospection and analysis under the current technological conditions.

[0020] After the assessment is completed, the system automatically exports the student's assessment score, assessment conclusion, and corresponding arguments, solving the problem that teachers need to manually input assessment scores under the current technology and reducing the teacher's workload.

[0021] After the assessment is completed, the system automatically analyzes the students' mastery of the material in the current class and provides assessment data information for each model, position, station, checkpoint, class, personnel, and each dimension of the inspection, suggesting areas that teachers need to strengthen in subsequent teaching.

[0022] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be understood that the above description of the embodiments is only for the purpose of helping to understand the method and core idea of ​​the present invention, and is not intended to limit the scope of protection of the present invention. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, etc. made within the idea and principle of the present invention should be included within the scope of protection of the present invention.

Claims

1. An assessment method for helicopter ground inspection and maintenance training, characterized in that: S1: In the assessment preparation stage, the instructor will prepare the test questions to be assessed, determine the score weight of each test question, determine the scoring criteria, complete the editing on the computer, and import it into the smart wearable terminal. After that, the students will wear the smart wearable terminal and input the basic information to be assessed, such as name, major, class group, etc., through voice recognition, manual input, etc., and select the inspection model and inspection position. S2: Trainee Assessment Phase. After entering the assessment station, the student verbally states the name of the station. The inspection process at each checkpoint is as follows: S2.1 The student describes the names of the stations / checkpoints that need to be executed in the current step. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description order is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.2 The intelligent wearable terminal system determines whether the station / checkpoint name described by the student in step 1 is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.3 Students face the current station / checkpoint, take a photo with a smart wearable terminal, and confirm that the photo meets the requirements of the station / checkpoint. The system uses image recognition to determine whether the photo taken by the student meets the characteristics of the station / checkpoint described in step 2. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.4 Students describe the inspection method at the current site / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.

5. The student describes the inspection tools needed for the current site / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system judges whether the student's description is correct. If it is correct, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.6 The student picks up the inspection tool described in step 5, takes a picture with the smart wearable terminal, and confirms that the picture taken meets the requirements of the tool used at the current station / checkpoint. The system uses image recognition to determine whether the picture taken by the student meets the tool characteristics described in step 4. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.7 Students use the selected tools to perform inspection operations. The smart wearable terminal uses motion recognition to determine whether the current inspection action meets the operation requirements of the current station / inspection point. If it does, a corresponding score is given based on the weight. S2.8 Students describe the inspection results of the current station / checkpoint. The smart wearable terminal system automatically matches the preset station / checkpoint status. If it matches, it gives a corresponding score based on the weight. S2.9 Repeat steps 1-8 until all steps are completed. The intelligent wearable terminal system accumulates all scores and divides by the full score to obtain the score for this assessment.

2. The assessment method for helicopter ground inspection and maintenance teaching process as described in claim 1, characterized in that: It also includes a grade review stage. If a student has any objection to the assessment score, the teacher can manually confirm it by watching the student's operation video. If there are any omissions or errors in the judgment, the teacher can change the student's assessment score.

3. The assessment method for helicopter ground inspection and maintenance teaching process as described in claim 1, characterized in that: After completing the assessment tasks for all students, the teacher imports the data from the smart wearable terminal into the computer system. The system automatically organizes and exports the student assessment scores according to the teacher's requirements. It also provides data from different dimensions for the teacher's reference.

Images