COMPOSITION FOR USE IN CLEANING METAL COMPONENTS

Description

FIELD

[0001] This disclosure is directed to a solvent composition for use in cleaning metal components. More specifically, the composition includes a blend of organic solvents that, while being exempted from, or not classified as, a volatile organic compound, a hazardous air pollutant, or a potential carcinogen. The invention is set out in the appended claims.BACKGROUND

[0002] Metal parts cleaners generally fall in to one of two categories: chlorinated solvents and hydrocarbon solvents. Although chlorinated solvents are non-flammable and are not classified as a volatile organic compound (VOC), they are generally considered to be a potential carcinogen and pose an less than acceptable health risk to users. Hydrocarbon solvents, on the other hand, possess favorable cleaning action and fast evaporation without residue, however, they have varying serious health risks, including potential carcinogenic effects. These solvents, such as toluene, benzene, xylene, and hexane, are classified as a VOC or a hazardous air pollutant (HAP), which limits their use in commercial settings. It would be beneficial to create a metal parts cleaner that has the solubility and cleaning action properties of these traditional solvents, but without the associated health risks to the user.

[0003] Against this background, reference can be made to US 2014 / 311384 A1, WO 2017 / 214042 A1 and US 5 612 303 A.SUMMARY

[0004] A composition for use in cleaning metal components is disclosed. In one embodiment, the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the composition are δD ≥ 15, δP < 6, and δH from 5.5 to 6.9. Moreover, the composition includes a blend of organic solvents.

[0005] Specifically, the blend of organic solvents include a halogenated aromatic solvent having one or more halide groups and from 6 to 8 carbon atoms, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the halogenated aromatic solvent are in the range of δD : 17 - 19, δP: 5-7, and δH: 3-5; an organic solvent having one or more ester functional group and from 3 to 9 carbon atoms, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the organic solvent are in the range of δD : 14 - 16, δP: 3.5-7.5, and δH: 5-10; and the following: a linear or branched hydrocarbon solvent with 6-12 carbon atoms with a single polar moiety head group, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the hydrocarbon solvent are in the range of δD : 6-9, δP: 1-3, and δH: 5-7, the hydrocarbon solvent having a single polar moiety head group is 1-butoxyhexanol or 2-ethyl-hexanol which is present in an amount from about 0.1% to about 1% of the composition; and a solvent containing one or more ketone functional groups and from 2 to 5 carbon atoms, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the solvent containing one or more ketone functional groups are in the range of δD : 14-16, δP: 8.5 - 11, and δH: 5-8.

[0006] In one embodiment, the halogenated aromatic solvent is parachlorobenzotriflouride which is present in an amount from about 0.25% to about 20% of the composition.

[0007] In another embodiment, the organic solvent with one or more ester functional groups is selected from the group consisting of tert-butyl acetate, methyl acetate, dimethyl carbonate, diethylene glycol monoethyl acetate, and diethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate. In yet another embodiment, the organic solvent with one or more ester functional groups is tert-butyl acetate which is present in an amount from about 25% to about 65% of the composition.

[0008] In another embodiment, the hydrocarbon solvent having a single polar moiety head group is 1-butoxyhexanol or 2-ethyl-hexanol which is present in an amount from about 0.1% to about 1% of the composition.

[0009] In another embodiment, the solvent containing one or more ketone functional groups is acetone which is present in an amount from about 5% to about 50% of the composition.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010] The accompanying figures, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate various example configurations and data, and are used merely to illustrate various example embodiments. In the figures, like elements bear like reference numerals. Figure 1 is the graphical representation of evaporation curves for various example formulations.DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0011] A composition for use in cleaning metal parts is provided. Specifically the composition includes a blend of organic solvents. In one embodiment, the blend includes one or more organic solvent, wherein none of the solvents are classified as a volatile organic compound. Surprisingly, it has been found that this blend of organic solvents exhibits a cleaning action, solubility parameters, and evaporation rates (leading to decreased residue on the component) that are comparable to solvents considered to pose potential health risks.

[0012] Although none of the solvents are classified as a volatile organic compound, the resulting composition exhibits Hansen Solubility Parameters that are similar to those substances. Specifically, the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the blended composition have been found to be δ D ≥ 14-16, δ P < 3.5 - 7, and δ H from 5.5 to 6.9.

[0013] In one embodiment, the halogenated aromatic solvent having one or more halide groups and from 6 to 8 carbon atoms has Hansen Solubility Parameters that are in the range of δD : 17 - 19, δP: 5-7, and δH: 3-5 and is present in the composition in an amount of from 0.25% to 20%, and preferably from about 1% to about 9%, of the total composition. Further, it should be understood that these halogenated aromatic solvents are not considered a HAP or potential carcinogen and are exempted from VOC, or they exhibit a vapor pressure of less than about 0.1 mmHg at 20°C. In one embodiment, the halogenated aromatic solvent is parachlorobenzotriflouride (PCBTF).

[0014] In another embodiment, the organic solvent having one or more ester functional group and from 3 to 9 carbon atoms has Hansen Solubility Parameters that are in the range of δD : 14 - 16, δP: 3.5-7.5, and δH: 5-10 and is present in the composition in an amount from about 25% to about 65% of the total composition. Further, it should be understood that these ester-containing organic solvents are not considered a HAP or potential carcinogen and are exempted from VOC, or they exhibit a vapor pressure of less than about 0.1 mmHg at 20°C. In one embodiment the ester-containing organic solvent may be methyl acetate, dimethyl carbonate, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether / diethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate (commercially available from Eastman Chemical Company), t-butyl acetate. In another embodiment, the solvent is t-butyl acetate.

[0015] In another embodiment the linear or branched hydrocarbon solvent with 6-12 carbon atoms and a single polar moiety head group has Hansen Solubility Parameters that are in the range of δD : 6-9, δP: 1-3, and δH: 5-7 is present in the amount of about 0.1 to about 1.2%, and in another embodiment from about 0.1 to about 1.0%. Further, it should be understood that these linear or branched hydrocarbon solvents are not considered a HAP or potential carcinogen and are exempted from VOC, or they exhibit a vapor pressure of less than about 0.1 mmHg at 20°C. In one embodiment, the hydrocarbon solvent is 2-butoxyhexanol or 2-ethylhexanol. In another embodiment, the hydrocarbon solvent is 2-ethylhexanol.

[0016] These medium chain length organic solvents may function as a surfactant, lowering the surface tension between the product and the soiled surfaces. Moreover, the organic solvents have been found to enhance the composition's wetting action, and thus, its cleaning ability without leaving a residue or adversely affecting the drying rate.

[0017] In another embodiment, the solvent containing one or more ketone functional groups and from 2 to 5 carbon atoms has Hansen Solubility Parameters that are in the range of δD : 14-16, δP: 8.5 - 11, and δH: 5-8 and is present in an amount of about 5% to about 50%. Further, it should be understood that these solvents are not considered a HAP or potential carcinogen and are exempted from VOC, or they exhibit a vapor pressure of less than about 0.1 mmHg at 20°C. In one embodiment, the solvent containing one or more ketone functional group is acetone. It has been found that the addition of a solvent, such as acetone, enhances the evaporation rate of the blended composition.ExamplesSolvent Effect - Varied Soils

[0018] Individual solvents were evaluated by visual inspection of solvation action when applied to various soils encountered in automotive cleaning procedures. The soils used for testing included 10W-30 motor oil, DOT 3 brake fluid, #2 Lithium Grease, and Power Steering Fluid. Solvation was evaluated on a relative scale: Poor, Fair, Good and Excellent. The rating is based on the solvent's ability to blend with the soil of interest, the rate of the blending, the amount of solvent required to remove the soil from the substrate and the amount of residue left behind by the solvent.Test Procedure

[0019] In one example, the individual solvents were evaluated. Aluminum test dishes were prepared by applying approximately 5 drops of each soil to the dishes. Neat solvent was added dropwise beside each soil so that the edges of the two materials came in contact with one another. The solvation action of the solvent was observed. The extent to which the soil and the solvent mixed and the rate of mixing was observed. Additional solvent was then applied to each section and the dish was lifted to observe the removal of the soil. Another addition of solvent was applied by pipette (approx. 1-2 mL) to observe the spray-off characteristics of each soil / solvent combination. Relative Solvation Rating Standards - Table 1Rating Explanation PoorLittle or no solvation. Very slow rate of solvation. Large amount of soil residue after spray.FairSome, slow solvation effect. Slow to Moderate solvation rate. Moderate amount of soil residue after spray.GoodSignificant solvation effect. Moderate to rapid solvation rate. Small amount of residue after spray.ExcellentSignificant solvation effect. Rapid / extensive solvation rate. No soil residue after spray.

[0020] The results of the Hansen Solubility calculations and evaporation rate data are shown below in Table 2: Table 2Hansen Data Solvents VOC dD dP dH MVol Evaporation Rate (BuAc = 1) TolueneYes181.42106.61.9XyleneYes17.613.1123.90.6HeptaneYes15.3001474.3Eastman EEHNo7.822.5195.90.0032-ethyl hexanolNo7.81.65.8123.9< 0.01dibasic ester LVPNo8.32.20151.210.009Dowanol EphNo17.85.714.3124.50.001Eastman OmniaNo7.873.135.62164.990.01Eastman DE AcetateNo7.92.54.5174.120.008Eastman DB AcetateNo7.83.45.2208.440.003Eastman DP SolventNo7.83.55.5152.780.01Eastman TexanolNo7.83.55.5152.780.002AcetoneNo15.510.4773.814.4PCBTFNo185.93.9134.750.9t-butyl acetateNo153.76132.62.8dimethyl carbonateNo8.54.71.984.23.22Carbitol SolventNo16.19.212.2135.560.01Methyl AcetateNo15.57.27.679.86Propylene CarbonateNo20184.185.20.005

[0021] The results of the Solvent Effect data for various soils are shown below in Table 3: Table 3Solvent Effect - Varied Soils Solvents VOC Motor Oil Brake Fluid Power Steering Fluid Greases TolueneYesExcellentGoodGoodGoodXyleneYesExcellentGoodGoodGoodHeptaneYesExcellentGoodGoodGoodEastman EEHNoGoodGoodFairFair2-ethyl hexanolNoGoodFairPoorExcellentdibasic ester LVPNoPoor / FairPoorPoor / FairGoodDowanol EphNoGoodExcellentGoodFairEastman OmniaNoGoodGoodGoodPoor / FairEastman DE AcetateNoFair / GoodGoodFair / GoodPoorEastman DB AcetateNoFair / GoodGoodFair / GoodPoorEastman DP SolventNoFair / GoodGoodFair / GoodPoorEastman TexanolNoGoodFair / GoodGoodPoorAcetoneNoPoorGoodExcellentPoorPCBTFNoExcellentExcellentFairFairt-butyl acetateNoExcellentExcellentFairFairdimethyl carbonateNoPoorGoodGoodPoorCarbitol SolventNoFair / GoodGoodGoodPoorMethyl AcetateNoFair / GoodExcellentGoodPoorPropylene CarbonateNoFairFair / GoodGoodPoor

[0022] Solvation in this context can be readily characterized by example. "No solvation" can be described by two materials that will not blend in any proportions, i.e. oil and water. For example, if a drop of oil and a drop of water are placed beside each other with edges touching, they will not blend and thus have no solvation. The opposite, and thus "excellent solvation," would be two materials that are miscible and will blend in any proportion. One example would be water and ethanol. If a drop of each were placed beside one another, with edges touching, the two would rapidly blend together and form a homogenous phase. Most materials have some degree of solubility with each other. The relative scale used above describes this, but also includes an observation of the rate at which it occurs. Excellent is near instantaneous. Good occurs over 1-3 seconds. Fair is over 5-20 seconds and poor requires significant time to solvate 30 seconds to several minutes. Similar quantification methods were used for the solvent blend tests, described below.Solvent Blend Effects - Application Testing on Varied Soils

[0023] In one example, the solvent blends were evaluated by visual inspection of their solvation action when applied to various soils encountered in automotive cleaning procedures. The soils used for testing were 10W-30 motor oil, DOT 3 brake fluid, #2 Lithium Grease, and Power Steering Fluid. Solvation was evaluated on a relative scale: Poor, Fair, Good and Excellent. The rating is based on the solvent blends ability to remove various soils from test panels. The effect is bracketed by the performance of the 10% VOC Parts cleaner on the low end and by the 45% VOC Parts Cleaner on the upper end and characterizes the solvent blend's ability to blend with the soil of interest, the rate of the blending, the amount of solvent blend required to remove the soil from the substrate, and the amount of residue left behind by the solvent.Test Procedure

[0024] Steel test panels were prepared by the following method. A thin film of NLGI #2 lithium complex grease, polyurea grease, and calcium sulfonate grease were applied to the steel test panels in sections with a rag. Approximately 3-5 mL of 10w-30 conventional motor oil, DOT 3 brake fluid, and power steering fluid were then applied in small puddles and smeared with a rag or paper towel. The panels were then baked at 60 °C for approximately 16 hours to simulate service conditions.

[0025] Once the panels were prepared, the individual solvent blends were prepared by mixing together the individual components in a glass beaker and then stirring the blends for 1-2 minutes. About 200 g of the blends were then charged into standard 12 oz [340.194 g] aerosol cans. The cans were then pressurized to approximately 100 PSI [6.89476 bar] with CO 2 , shaken well, and allowed to sit at least two hours to ensure CO 2 dissolution.

[0026] The individual solvent blends were then tested by the following method. Performance of test blends were compared to the Valvoline Professional Series (VPS) 10% VOC Parts Cleaner (commercially available from Valvoline LLC), for a low performance mark, and the VPS 45% VOC Parts Cleaner (commercially available from Valvoline LLC), for a high-performance mark. In a well-ventilated area or fume hood, the prepared panels were positioned above a catch pan. The test blends were then sprayed onto the soils in 2-3 second bursts, targeting each soil type individually. Each test blend was allowed to penetrate the soils for approximately 5-10 seconds. The test blends were then sprayed onto the soils again, targeting each soil type individually for an additional 2-3 second burst.

[0027] The cleaning performance was inspected visually between the first and second burst and after the panel was allowed to dry. They were evaluated by the same relative rating standards as above.

[0028] The compositions of the sample solvent blends are set forth in Table 4 below: Table 4Sample # Acetone t-butyl acetate PCBTF 2-ethylhexanol Eastman EEH 15025250027512.512.5003905500450500005752500069010000750050008750250099001000108010100011801550012805150013751510001475205001575101500166535000176525100018653050019504010002050455002125651000220851500236532.52.5002450005002575002502665003502790001002805005002906503503007502503109001003265000353375000253490000103506500353607500253709000103850452.52.503950454104050409104150400100425045050435040550440905504509091046296551047095410482967.52.51049096.52.510

[0029] The Hansen Solubility Parameters were calculated for each sample. The data from those calculations are provided below in Table 5. Table 5Sample #Hansen Solubility Parameters dD dP dH 113.86.95.5215.89.06.5315.69.846.795415.257.056.5515.3758.7256.75615.459.736.9716.758.155.45816.1259.2756.225915.759.956.691015.79.286.591115.559.176.6951215.859.396.4851315.6758.9456.541415.5258.8356.6451515.8259.0556.4351615.3258.0556.651715.6258.2756.441815.4758.1656.5451915.557.276.292015.47.166.3952115.4255.5956.042215.454.035.6852315.48.116.59752411.6566.42513.5758.26.72612.8057.326.582714.739.526.882811.42.655.92912.482.9655.933013.23.1755.953114.283.495.983212.8057.465.4253313.5758.35.8753414.739.566.553512.483.1054.7753613.23.2755.1253714.283.535.653815.1457.05256.44253915.2987.1176.4144015.4487.2276.3094114.536.846.484214.896.9456.494315.047.0556.3854414.793.7055.8854515.1983.8775.8094615.2235.7326.1834715.0483.7675.9144815.1485.6776.23554915.0033.7345.9455Samples 38 to 40 and 45 to 49 are Inventive Examples.

[0030] The results of the solvent removal data are set forth in Table 6, below. Table 6Sample #Observations (based on a summary of all soils used) Solvency Soil Removal Evaporation Rate Residue 1FairFairFair (slow)Significant2FairPoorFairExtensive3PoorPoorToo fastExtensive4FairGoodFairSignificant5FairFair-Significant6PoorPoorToo fastExtensive7GoodGoodToo slowSignificant8FairGoodToo slowSignificant9PoorFairFairExtensive10FairFairFairExtensive11FairFairFairExtensive12FairFairToo slowExtensive13FairGoodFairSignificant14GoodGoodFairSignificant15FairGoodToo slowSignificant16GoodFairFairMinimal17GoodGoodGoodMinimal18GoodGoodGoodMinimal19ExcellentGoodGoodMinimal20ExcellentGoodGoodMinimal21ExcellentGoodFairNone22ExcellentGoodFairNone23GoodFairGoodSignificant24PoorFairToo slowExtensive25FairFairToo slowExtensive26FairGoodToo slowSignificant27PoorFairToo slowExtensive28FairGoodToo slowNone29GoodGoodToo slowNone30GoodGoodToo slowNone31ExcellentExcellentToo slowNone32FairGoodToo slowSignificant33FairGoodToo slowSignificant34PoorPoorFairSignificant35GoodGoodToo slowNone36GoodGoodToo slowNone37ExcellentExcellentFairNone38GoodGoodFairMinimal39GoodGoodGoodMinimal40GoodGoodGoodMinimal41GoodExcellentToo slowSignificant42GoodExcellentToo slowSignificant43GoodExcellentToo slowSignificant44ExcellentExcellentPoorNone45ExcellentExcellentGoodNone46ExcellentExcellentGoodNone47ExcellentExcellentFairNone48ExcellentExcellentExcellentNone49ExcellentExcellentGoodNoneSamples 38 to 40 and 45 to 49 are Inventive Examples.

[0031] It will be understood that if a composition has an evaporation rate that is deemed to be "too slow," the solvent composition can be observed to linger on the cleaning surface or area around it for a significant amount of time (approximately 5 to about 10 minutes). If an evaporation rate is too slow, one would have to clean the soiled surface by another means (rag / paper towel, etc.) before continuing work.

[0032] Conversely, if a composition has an evaporation rate that is considered to be "too fast," the solvent composition does not dwell long enough on the soiled surface to either solvate the soil completely or facilitate its transport from the surface being cleaned. This results in having to use more product to transport the soil from the surface of the component being cleaned and can result in significant residue as well.

[0033] As can be seen from the data above, blended compositions that include about 25 to 30% acetone, about 97 to 65% t-butyl acetate, about 2.5 to about 5% PCBTF, and about 1% 2-ethylhexanol produce high quality cleaning composition, without the expected health risks generally associated with known metal parts cleaners. In one embodiment, the blended composition will preferably include about 29% acetone, about 67.5% t-butyl acetate, about 2.5% PCBTF, and about 1% 2-ethylhexanol, as in Sample #48..

[0034] There seems to be a strong relation between soil removal efficiency and the evaporation rate of the composition, with slow evaporation rates favoring improved soil removal. Moreover, while large amounts of 2-ethylhexanol appeared to negatively impact the evaporation rate of the overall composition, small amounts, that is less than about 2.5% of the total weight percent of the blend, appear to improve the wetting action of the other solvents and helped to improve the soil removal action of the blended composition. While not being bound to theory, it is believed that the presence of a small amount of 2-ethylhexanol reduces the evaporation rate of the composition enough to allow for thorough penetration of persistent soils, thus reducing the amount of blended composition required to achieve acceptable soil removal.

[0035] To that end, the evaporation rates of examples formulations were compared. Approximately 3 grams of each sample were weighed onto a 3 inch [7.62 cm] watch glass and left exposed in a fume hood at a face velocity of 109 feet [33.2232 m] per minute (FPM). The weight change of each sample was recorded as a function of time over approximately 15 - 17. As shown in Figure 1, this data was then plotted by weight change per minute. With continuing reference to Figure 1, it was found that the methyl acetate and PCBTF formula, lost nearly 85% of its weight in only 16 minutes. Sample #48, however, performed much better, losing only about 67.7%, while the toluene composition lost only 41.5% weight. The optimized evaporation rate of Sample #48 allow the formulations to remain on the soil for longer periods of time, increasing the soil removal capability, while minimizing the residue left behind.

[0036] In addition, the data shows that small amounts of PCBTF, from about 2.0% to about 20%, appears to have a synergistic solvation effect with acetone and t-butyl acetate. It is likely that the presence of an aromatic moiety and a chlorinated / fluorinated functionality contributes to this effect.

[0037] Finally, the data shows that the ability to control the evaporation rate has a large impact on the blended composition's overall performance. Preferably, a "stepwise" evaporation curve, with components in increasingly small amounts, with increasingly slower evaporation rates allows for soil penetration, but prevents a significant amount of residual cleaner from remaining on the soiled component part. This will ultimately improve the performance of the blended composition and reduce the amount needed.

[0038] While the invention has been described with respect to specific examples including presently preferred modes of carrying out the invention, those skilled in the art will appreciate that there are numerous systems and techniques that fall within the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims

1. A composition for use in cleaning metal components, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the composition are δD from 12.0 to 16.0, δP from 3.0 to 10.0, and δH from 4.0 to 6.9, and wherein the composition comprises a blend of organic solvents, wherein none of the solvents are classified as a volatile organic compound, wherein the blend of organic solvents comprises: a halogenated aromatic solvent having one or more halide groups and from 6 to 8 carbon atoms, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the halogenated aromatic solvent are in the range of δD : 17 - 19, δP: 5-7, and δH: 3-5; an organic solvent having one or more ester functional group and from 3 to 9 carbon atoms, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the organic solvent are in the range of δD : 14 - 16, δP : 3.5-7.5, and δH: 5-10; and the following: a linear or branched hydrocarbon solvent with 6-12 carbon atoms with a single polar moiety head group, wherein - the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the hydrocarbon solvent are in the range of δD : 6-9, δP: 1-3, and δH: 5-7, - the hydrocarbon solvent having a single polar moiety head group is 1-butoxyhexanol or 2-ethyl-hexanol, and - the hydrocarbon solvent is present in an amount from 0.1% to 2.5% of the composition; and a solvent containing one or more ketone functional groups and from 2 to 5 carbon atoms, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the solvent containing one or more ketone functional groups are in the range of δD : 14-16, δP: 8.5 - 11, and δH: 5-8.

2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the halogenated aromatic solvent is parachlorobenzotrifluoride, and wherein the parachlorobenzotrifluoride is present in an amount from 0.25% to 20% of the composition.

3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the organic solvent with one or more ester functional groups is selected from the group consisting of tert-butyl acetate, methyl acetate, dimethyl carbonate, diethylene glycol monoethyl acetate, and diethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate.

4. The composition of claim 3, wherein the organic solvent with one or more ester functional groups is tert-butyl acetate, and wherein the tert-butyl acetate is present in an amount from 15% to 95% of the composition.

5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the solvent containing one or more ketone functional groups is acetone, and where in the acetone is present in an amount from 5% to 75% of the composition.

6. The composition of claim 5, wherein the organic solvent with one or more ester functional groups is selected from the group consisting of tert-butyl acetate, methyl acetate, dimethyl carbonate, diethylene glycol monoethyl acetate, and diethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate.

7. The composition of claim 6, wherein the organic solvent with one or more ester functional groups is tert-butyl acetate.

8. The composition of claim 7, wherein the composition further comprises a hydrocarbon solvent having a single polar moiety head group, and wherein the hydrocarbon solvent is 1-butoxyhexanol or 2-ethyl-hexanol.

9. A composition for use in cleaning metal components, wherein the Hansen Solubility Parameters for the composition are δD ≥ 15, δP < 6, and δH from 5.5 to 6.9, and wherein the composition comprises a blend of organic solvents, and wherein either none of the solvents are classified as a volatile organic compound, a hazardous air pollutant, or Potential Carcinogen, or wherein the organic solvent exhibits a vapor pressure of less than 0.1 mmHg at 20°C, the blend of organic solvents comprising: from 1% to 9% parachlorobenzotrifluoride; and from 25% to 70% tert-butyl acetate; and one or more of the following: from 0.1 to 1% 2-ethylhexanol, and from 5% to 75% acetone.

10. The composition of claim 9, wherein the composition comprises both 2-ethylhexanol and acetone.

11. The composition of claim 10, wherein the composition comprises 25% to 29% acetone, 65% to 67.5% t-butyl acetate, 1% to 2.5% parachlorobenzotrifluoride, and 1% 2-ethylhexanol.