Method for manufacturing a woven label comprising a unique identifier

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for manufacturing a batch of woven labels comprising a unique identifier "UID" readable by means of an optical sensor, the method comprising the steps of: - obtaining a first list (31) of unique identifiers, defining a size of the manufacturing batch; - performing a mapping of the batch of labels to be woven; - weaving the labels; - cutting them out by means of an automatic cutting and inspecting machine; - packaging the labels; According to the invention, the method comprises, between the cutting-out step and the packaging step, a step of individually inspecting each unique identifier, in order to verify the readability of the unique identifier of each of the labels, and: - if the label passes the inspection, it is transferred automatically in order to be packaged; or - if it does not pass the inspection, it is set aside so as not to be packaged.

Description

Description Title of the invention: method of manufacturing a woven label comprising a unique identifier Technical field

[0001] The invention relates to the technical field of weaving textile labels, and to traceability solutions. Prior art

[0002] Paper traceability labels are known from the prior art, each with a unique identifier. This type of traceability label is generally obtained by digital printing (inkjet or laser). This type of solution is satisfactory in the areas of document traceability, or even medication traceability.

[0003] However, these solutions are not suitable for the textile and clothing industry, where items have a long lifespan and must be washed, for example. It may be possible to print labels on suitable textile substrates, but these printed textile labels do not meet the expected lifespan criteria in the sector in question.

[0004] It is also known from the prior art to weave labels with an identifier, for example coded using a QR code. Woven labels can have different codes from each other. However, the weaving process, particularly in the case of high-definition Jacquard weaving using low-count yarns, is much less stable and controllable than a printing process: when weaving labels, part of the production will be defective: this is the reject, or "waste".

[0005] Furthermore, in the case of codes with high resolution, i.e. containing a high density of information, or in the case of codes of small dimensions, for example less than 20mm on each side, then the readability of the code is not guaranteed. It is possible that a device such as a Smartphone may fail to read the code.

[0006] There is therefore a difficulty in offering the textile and clothing industry durable labels, each with a unique identifier, and capable of being used for traceability purposes. Statement of the invention

[0007] One of the aims of the invention is to overcome the drawbacks of the prior art, in particular by proposing a method for manufacturing durable labels having a unique identifier.

[0008] Another aim of the invention is to propose a method of manufacturing labels for traceability purposes.

[0009] According to a first embodiment, a method has been developed for manufacturing a batch of woven labels comprising a unique identifier “UID” readable by means of an optical sensor.

[0010] In this mode, the method comprises steps consisting of: - obtain an order for labels, including a list of references of labels to be woven and a desired quantity of each reference; - create a first list: - including the “SKU” woven label references; - presenting a quantity of each reference greater than the desired quantity, according to a waste rate, defining a size of the manufacturing batch of the labels of the order; - including a unique identifier “UID” for each member of the first list; - carry out a mapping of the batch of labels to be woven; - weave the labels; - cut them using an automatic cutting and control machine.

[0011] The method comprises, between the cutting step and the packaging step, a step of automatic unitary control of the unique identifier, in order to: - check the readability of the unique identifier of each of the labels; - identify within the first list the reference of the label being checked; - check that the number of compliant labels already produced of the reference in during the control, is less than the number of labels ordered for this reference; and following the control: - if the control is compliant, the label is automatically transferred for packaging, and the number of compliant labels for this reference is incremented; or - in the event of non-compliance of the control, the label is automatically discarded so as not to be packaged.

[0012] The manufacturing batch including the waste, and therefore providing for the production of a greater number of labels than the brand desires, the method according to the invention makes it possible to guarantee that the brand is delivered: - the right quantity of labels compared to what he ordered; - labels each presenting a UID, correctly readable, which makes them compatible with traceability applications, and in a durable manner because the labels are woven.

[0013] The different label references correspond to the different variable data that labels present on the same mask. For example: - the mask defines the fixed data, which is identical on all labels (label background color, brand logo); - a first variable data can be the size of the garment intended to receive the label; - a second variable data can be the unique reference of the article intended to receive the label (“SKU” according to the Anglicism “stock keeping unit”).

[0014] Although in practice these are different labels, as they have different variable data, the articles of the same model will be produced simultaneously by a manufacturer (for example, all shirts of a model, regardless of size S, M, L, XL): the brand therefore orders the labels of a model simultaneously.

[0015] By compliant control, we mean that the unique identifier is indeed readable by the optical sensor, and that the quantity of labels packaged will not exceed what the brand expects. Of course, the manufacturer knows how to adapt its waste rate based on the performance of its manufacturing process, in order to ensure that the quantity of labels packaged is not less than what the brand expects. The waste rate can be proportional (percentage) or fixed

[0016] According to a second embodiment, a method has been developed for manufacturing a batch of woven labels comprising a unique identifier called "UID", readable by means of an optical sensor, the method comprising the steps consisting of: - obtain a first list of unique identifiers, defining a size of the manufacturing batch; - carry out a mapping of the batch of labels to be woven; - weave the labels; - cutting the fabric using an automatic cutting and control machine; - condition the labels.

[0017] In this mode, the method comprises, between the cutting step and the packaging step, a unitary control step of the unique identifier, in order to verify the uniqueness and readability of the unique identifier of each of the labels, and: - if the control is compliant, the label is automatically transferred for packaging; or - in the event of non-compliance of the control, the label is automatically discarded so as not to be packaged.

[0018] By compliant control, we mean here that the unique identifier is indeed readable by the optical sensor, and that the unique identifier is indeed unique in the sense that this identifier must not have already been manufactured. The control step therefore includes a step where the unique identifier is automatically searched within a database of previously manufactured labels, called the "big list", in order to verify that the unique identifier read is not found in the big list.

[0019] In this way, only labels with a truly unique and legible identifier are put on the market. This overcomes the difficulties associated with the specific Jacquard weaving technique. The uniqueness of the unique identifiers allows them to be used in traceability applications.

[0020] In the event that manufacturing incidents or an excessively high waste rate have led the label manufacturer to reweave part of the production batch, any risk of duplication is avoided.

[0021] Each of these two methods makes it possible to solve the problem posed, since they make it possible to provide a brand with woven labels presenting a UID, while the manufacturing process includes variability and a share of waste which does not allow knowing in advance which compliant labels will be obtained.

[0022] Although the first method allows the brand to avoid providing the list of UIDs, and the second method is suitable for cases where the brand provides the list of UIDs, these two methods can be used as an alternative or in addition.

[0023] Since the label is woven, its lifespan and the readability of the code are satisfactory for the entire lifespan of the item to which the label is attached.

[0024] In a particular embodiment, the compliant unit control automatically results in the recording of the unique identifier of the label in a second list. This makes it possible to have an authentic list which only includes the unique identifiers of stickers actually manufactured and compliant with this manufacturing batch, and this second list can be used by the purchaser of the label in traceability applications.

[0025] In order to increase the level of refinement of traceability, following the packaging of labels in a handling unit, an identifier of the handling unit is automatically recorded in a handling data field of the second list, in order to group the unique identifiers of this handling unit within a third list. In this way, the acquirer of the label can redistribute the handling units to processors of the articles, and know precisely which are the unique identifiers of the labels which have been entrusted to each processor.

[0026] Advantageously, packaging labels in a handling unit automatically results in the printing of a handling label which presents the third list of this handling unit. This facilitates the management of handling units, since an order picker handling the handling units does not need to use an electronic device to obtain the third list. Order preparation and logistics operations are therefore facilitated.

[0027] In a particular case, entering a unique identifier of a label contained in the handling unit automatically results in the edition of the handling label. In this way there is no risk of labeling errors: the handling label will be assigned without error to the correct handling unit.

[0028] In order to limit the number of labels manufactured in advance, and to avoid the loss or misappropriation of traceability labels manufactured in advance, the size of the manufacturing batch is variable, and is defined by a number of labels ordered by the purchaser of the labels, the expected waste rate of the manufacturing process. Thus only the quantity of labels necessary at a given time is manufactured, and the right quantity is delivered to the manufacturers. The risks of counterfeiting are thus limited.

[0029] In order to automate the exchange of information, and to reduce copying and data management errors, the list of unique identifiers is obtained automatically by an exchange of electronic data, known as "EDI".

[0030] Using EDI helps limit human errors in data copying or computer file management. In addition, EDI data exchange allows data to be directly and automatically integrated into ERP databases.

[0031] The same applies to the transmission of the second list, which is automatically transmitted to a customer of the label manufacturer, once the production of the batch of labels is completed, as well as for the third list(s) corresponding to the handling units: each of these lists is preferably transmitted by EDI.

[0032] In order to make traceability more reliable, the unique identifier of a label is affiliated with an article of the ready-to-wear type or accessory in the fields of fashion, textiles and clothing, intended to receive the label, and the affiliation is carried out after the control, and before the receipt of the label by its acquirer or by a processor. In this way, the acquirer of the label can implement logistics tracking and traceability solutions even before the item is completed: these tracking operations can begin as soon as the label is manufactured. These logistics operations can include the transfer of the label from the manufacturer to the acquirer, the transfer of the label from the acquirer to the processors, the return of the produced item equipped with a label from the processor to a logistics center of the acquirer, or the transfer of the item to the store.

[0033] Advantageously, the affiliation is carried out automatically from the EDI file transmitted once the production of the batch of labels is completed. The automation of data management is even more advanced.

[0034] The invention also relates to an installation comprising a label weaving machine, a label cutting machine, control means, a computer system, and the installation is configured to implement the method according to the aforementioned characteristics. Description of the drawings

[0035] [Fig.1] illustrates exchanges of information and products that can occur between a label manufacturer, a label purchaser, in other words a brand, a manufacturer of the brand, and a customer using the brand's products.

[0036] [Fig.2] illustrates a database grouping the information contained in a first list, a second list and in third lists.

[0037] [Fig.3] is an illustration of a label showing a QR code encoding a unique identifier. Detailed description

[0038] The invention relates to a method of manufacturing woven labels, enabling these woven labels to be used in traceability applications.

[0039] These woven labels therefore each have a unique identifier called a "UID". This unique identifier can be a sequence of numbers or preferably an alphanumeric sequence, and can be woven onto the label in the form of characters, or in the form of a code encoding the unique identifier. The code can then be of the barcode type, or a two-dimensional code of the 2D code type, QR code, data Matrix, etc. In a particular case, the UlD is presented in the form of an internet link ("URL" according to the Anglicism "uniform resource locator"), and the URL is unique.

[0040] In the technical field under consideration, it is expected that within the label production batch, some of the labels will be defective. This may be due to weaving defects (false thread), loom defects (warp breakage, jamming), or a cutting defect (cutting not centered for example).

[0041] When we start manufacturing a batch of labels with a unique identifier, there is no certainty as to which labels will actually be obtained at the end of the process.

[0042] The method according to the invention therefore comprises a step of automatic and unitary control of the labels, between a step of cutting the labels and a step of packaging the labels.

[0043] This unitary control can include the usual checks in the field, namely the verification of the centering of the label, the absence of stains, etc. According to the invention, the unitary control also includes the verification of the good readability of the unique identifier, and two embodiments also provide for: - the control of the number of compliant labels already produced of the reference being controlled, compared to the number of labels ordered of this reference; and / or - control of the uniqueness of the ULD within the labels produced.

[0044] The correct readability of the unique identifier is carried out using a sensor such as an optical sensor or a camera. This sensor is connected to a machine to perform optical character recognition. The check can simply consist of the sensor correctly reading a barcode or QR code.

[0045] In cases where the uniqueness of the unique identifier must be verified, this check is carried out by comparing the unique identifier read with a list of unique identifiers of labels already produced, called the "big list". The big list is recorded in a writable memory of the machine, and is updated as and when manufacturing process or the manufacturing of successive batches: - either in real time with each correct reading of a new unique identifier, - either at regular intervals when a set of compliant labels has been produced (for example at the end of a manufacturing batch).

[0046] The large list can be administered by the label manufacturer (30), or by the brand (10). In practice, it is administered by the entity that issues the unique identifiers and manages the related constraints, such as the guarantee of uniqueness of the identifiers issued.

[0047] In cases where the completion of the order of the mark (10) is verified, the computer program compares the number of compliant labels already produced in order to discard the excess labels, reference by reference within a model.

[0048] Table 1 below illustrates an example of an order for a brand (10). For an item model (41) (“NTI1823 Sweater”), three colors exist (“color” column), and the sweater is available in two sizes (“size” column).

[0049] Each color and size combination defines a different item (41) (column “SKU”), of the same sweater model.

[0050] The desired label quantities are indicated in the last column of the table. In this simplified example, the total order is 13 labels.

[0051] [Table 1] 0052] The manufacturer then defines a first list (31), illustrated in Table 2, and in which: - a unique identifier is assigned to each item; - the total number of items to be manufactured is increased according to the expected waste rate (to simplify the reading of the tables, only one line is added for each item). In our example, the manufacturing batch provides for the production of 19 labels.

[0053] Since each item is assigned a UID while the label is not yet delivered (and in this case, not yet manufactured), this is an upstream affiliation, which will allow the brand (10) to carry out traceability operations as soon as possible (concerning the label alone, then concerning the item (41) as soon as the label is attached to it).

[0054] [Table 2] 0055] The labels are then woven, each presenting their UID. - In some cases, labels also present variable data (in our example: color and / or size and / or SKU). - In other cases, the labels do not present variable data complementary to the UID.

[0056] After the cutting stage and before the packaging stage, the labels are checked: - labels whose UID is not readable are ejected; - labels with a readable UID are packaged, unless the desired quantity by the mark (10) is already reached: in this case, the excess labels are also ejected.

[0057] The result of this check is shown in Table 3 below.

[0058] [Table 3] 0059] The compliant labels are packaged. Preferably, the corresponding UIDs are recorded in a second list (32), intended for the brand (10). Such a second list (32) is illustrated in table 4 below. Advantageously, this second list (32) also includes a handling unit field (column “IUM”), allowing the brand (10) to know precisely the contents of each handling unit and to easily know what are the UIDs of the labels that it gives to each of its processors (40).

[0060] [Table 4] 0061 ] In some cases, the uniqueness of the unique identifier as well as the completion are checked during the check.

[0062] In all cases, if the unit control is compliant, the label is automatically transferred downstream of the cutting machine for packaging.

[0063] On the other hand, if the inspection is non-compliant, then the label is automatically discarded so as not to be packaged: this may involve a production stoppage of the machine, and the operator must remove the defective label before restarting production. Preferably, the label is ejected automatically by automatic ejection means, for example by means of a compressed air blower which ejects the label towards a bin, so that production is uninterrupted.

[0064] In cases where UIDs are provided by the brand, the manufacturer (30) may also provide the brand (10) with a list of non-compliant UIDs, i.e. those present on the first list (31) but absent from the second list (32), so that the brand (10) can deactivate these UIDs within its data system.

[0065] In order for the purchaser of the labels, i.e. the brand (10), to know the unique identifiers of the compliant labels and ensure its stock monitoring and traceability, the compliant unit control results in the recording of the unique identifier in a second list (32) which corresponds to the current manufacturing batch. The second list (32) is recorded on a writable memory of the machine, and will subsequently be provided to the brand (10).

[0066] Preferably the second list (32) comprises at least one handling data field, making it possible to group the unique identifiers of several labels within third lists (33), defined by the label handling units. For example, in the case of a mark (10) which order 1000 labels to be packaged in bags of 100, then the second list (32) of 1000 labels corresponds to 10 third lists (33) of 100 labels each. In the event of loss of a handling unit, or distribution of handling units to different manufacturers, then the tracking and traceability desired by the mark (10) are facilitated.

[0067] Still with the aim of facilitating monitoring and traceability, the handling units have a handling label allowing each handling unit to be identified, preferably without using readers such as a smartphone.

[0068] The handling label therefore presents at least one identifier of the handling unit, but advantageously the handling label presents the third list (33) on which appears each unique identifier of the labels contained in the handling unit. Thus, it is not even necessary to consult an information system to know the content of the third list. (33) corresponding to the handling unit in question.

[0069] With the obvious aim of reducing labeling errors, the handling label must be affixed to the handling unit as soon as possible after it has been assembled. Preferably, it is therefore the packaging of the labels in the handling unit that triggers the printing of this handling label. This can be an automatic printout triggered by the cutting and packaging machine when the handling unit is complete.

[0070] It can also involve entering a unique identifier of a label contained in the handling unit that has just been closed.

[0071] There may be several levels of handling unit (bag containing labels, grouping bag containing several bags, carton containing several grouping bags).

[0072] Preferably, the lowest level handling unit only contains labels of the same reference (SKU). The grouping bag can be used to group together the different references of the same model.

[0073] The packaging machine is programmed to orient the cut label towards the correct handling unit (for example, via the rotation of a carousel comprising several bags).

[0074] With reference to Figure 1, the brand (10) indicates to the label manufacturer (30) how many labels it wishes to acquire, and possibly the distribution it wishes to carry out among its different manufacturers (40). This transmission of information (11) can be automatically generated by EDI, from the orders for the production of articles (41) that the brand (10) has placed with its manufacturers (40): the total number of articles (41) ordered is automatically integrated into the EDI intended for the manufacturer (10).

[0075] A number of unique identifiers, greater than the number of desired labels, then defines the size of the label production batch: the expected waste rate should be added, for example 10% or 5%.

[0076] The unique identifiers can be provided by the brand (10) or by the manufacturer (30) of labels, and constitute a first list (31).

[0077] The manufacturing batch is then prepared for weaving, this is called carding.

[0078] The labels are then woven on a suitable loom, compatible with variable data weaving.

[0079] The width obtained after weaving is usually slit, i.e. cut lengthwise, before the label rolls are cut into individual labels. Automatic label cutting machines must make registered cuts, i.e. not cut the label pattern or the unique identifier. Depending on the brand's needs (10), the labels can also be folded.

[0080] Each of the weaving, slitting or cutting operations can present risks of non-conformity of the label, which is why the control of the conformity and uniqueness of the label is carried out after cutting.

[0081] In practice, this may involve placing the finished label on a conveyor belt, or presenting it using gripping means in front of an optical sensor.

[0082] It is then this optical sensor, or reader, which carries out the final check of the readability of the unique identifier as well as its uniqueness. Only if this final check is compliant will the label be transmitted to the packaging station, and the unique identifier will be added to the second list. (32).

[0083] The installation used by the label manufacturer (30) therefore includes a computer system making it possible to administer the data necessary for implementing the process, and interacting if necessary with the different automatons of the different machines used.

[0084] Once the batch has been manufactured, excess labels may be destroyed. Only the necessary quantity is supplied to the brand (10), or directly to the manufacturers (40) indicated by the brand (10).

[0085] Referring to Figure 2, the data obtained in an example where a brand wishes to acquire 20 unique labels has been illustrated. A first list (31) of identifiers is then created, comprising 30 unique identifiers, see the “identifier” column.

[0086] During production, labels No. 5, 9, 14, 15, 19 and 24 were defective: they were removed from production and their identifier was not entered on the second list (32), see column “2 nde list ".

[0087] Since the quantity of 20 compliant labels was reached, labels 27 to 30 were also discarded. In this example, the waste rate was overestimated.

[0088] The packaging being carried out in bags of 10, two third lists (33) were formed, see the “3rd list” column: - a first third list (33) containing the identifiers identified as “UM1” - a second third list (33) containing the identifiers marked “UM2”.

[0089] In parallel with the supply (34) of the labels, the second list (32) is provided to the brand (10), allowing it to carry out its own subsequent traceability operations.

[0090] To the extent that the labels can be transmitted to different manufacturers (40) of the brand (10), then the manufacturer (30) also transmits to the mark (10) the third lists (33) each of which corresponds to the unique identifiers contained in each of the handling units.

[0091] Furthermore, the method according to the invention advantageously makes it possible to affiliate a unique identifier with an article (41) of the brand (10), upstream of the supply (34) of the labels to the brand (10) or to a manufacturer (40). The affiliation (12) corresponds to the linking, within a database, of a unique identifier with an article (41). It can therefore be the linking of a unique identifier with a URL, other data of the article (41) such as the SKU, the size, the color, etc.

[0092] This operation is facilitated when the lists (32, 33) are transmitted by EDI, and a fortiori when the manufacturer (30) provides the third lists (33) the affiliation (12) can then be automated, the identifiers of a third list (33) being able to be affiliated with the articles (41) that the brand (10) has ordered from a given manufacturer (40).

[0093] When the label handling units are delivered to the various processors (40), the processors (40) must respect the affiliation (12) decided by the brand (10) and affix the correct label to the correct item (41). This method offers the brand (10) the highest possible level of traceability, and limits the possibilities of label diversion, and therefore counterfeiting.

[0094] In the case where the labels also include authenticity solutions, i.e. anti-counterfeiting, then the brand (10) can guarantee that all its articles (41) placed on the market are authentic due to the anti-counterfeiting solutions of the label, which makes the reproduction (reweaving) of a unique label by a third party futile.

[0095] This offers undeniable advantages in reassuring customers (40) of the brand (10), for example by offering them solutions for verifying the authenticity of the items (41) they purchase. These authentication and traceability solutions are also interesting in the context of the second-hand market, when purchases and resales of items (41) are made between individuals, without going through the brand's stores (10).

[0096] Figure 3 illustrates a woven label, presenting a QR code encoding a unique identifier, and making it possible to implement the method of the invention. The label is attached to a garment, accompanied by a printed fabric label.

[0097] Furthermore, the manufacturing method and the installation may be configured differently from the examples given without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims.

[0098] For example, the manufacturer (30) can compile several orders received from a brand (10) during a predefined interval, for example a week, in order to pool its production tool. This makes it possible to reduce the waste rate, which is higher during the adjustment of the machines but which decreases once the nominal production rate is reached. The method can then include an additional step of compiling several orders, prior to the definition of the first list (31).

[0099] Furthermore, the technical characteristics of the various embodiments and variants mentioned above can be combined, in whole or in part, with each other. Thus, the manufacturing method and the installation can be adapted in terms of cost, functionality and performance.

Claims

Claims [Claims 1] Method for manufacturing a batch of woven labels each comprising a unique identifier “UID” readable by means of an optical sensor, characterized in that the method comprises steps consisting of: - obtain an order for labels, including a list of references of labels to be woven and a desired quantity of each reference; - create a first list (31): - including the “SKU” woven label references; - presenting a quantity of each reference greater than the desired quantity, according to a waste rate, defining a size of the manufacturing batch of the labels of the order; - comprising a unique identifier “UID” for each member of the first list (31); - carry out a mapping of the batch of labels to be woven; - weave the labels; - cut them using an automatic cutting and inspection machine; and in that the method comprises, between the cutting step and the packaging step, a step of automatic unit inspection of the unique identifier, in order to: - check the readability of the unique identifier of each of the labels; - identify within the first list the reference of the label being checked; - check that the number of compliant labels already produced for the reference being checked is less than the number of labels ordered for this reference; and following the check: - if the control is compliant, the label is automatically transferred for packaging, and the number of compliant labels for this reference is incremented; or - in the event of non-compliance of the control, the label is automatically discarded so as not to be packaged. [Claims 2] Method of manufacturing a batch of woven labels comprising a unique identifier “UID” readable by means of an optical sensor, the method comprising the steps of: - obtain a first list (31) of unique identifiers, defining a size of the manufacturing batch; - carry out a mapping of the batch of labels to be woven; - weave the labels; - cut them using an automatic cutting and control machine; - conditioning the labels; characterized in that the method comprises, between the cutting step and the conditioning step, a step of automatic unitary control of the unique identifier, in order to verify the readability of the unique identifier of each of the labels, and: - if the control is compliant, the label is automatically transferred for packaging; or - in the event of non-compliance of the control, the label is discarded so as not to be packaged. [Claims 3] Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the compliant unitary check results in the recording of the unique identifier of the label in a second list (32). [Claims 4] Method according to claim 3, characterized in that following the packaging of labels in a handling unit, an identifier of the handling unit is recorded in a handling data field of the second list (32), in order to group the unique identifiers of this handling unit within a third list (33). [Claims 5] Method according to claim 4, characterized in that the packaging of labels in a handling unit results in the edition of a handling label which presents the third list (33) of this handling unit. [Claims 6] Method according to claim 5, characterized in that an entry of a UID of a label contained in the handling unit results in the edition of the handling label. [Claims 7] Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the size of the manufacturing batch is variable, and is defined by a number of labels ordered by a customer (40) from the label manufacturer (30), and the expected waste rate of the manufacturing process. [Claims 8] Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the list of unique identifiers is obtained by a computer data exchange, called “EDI”. [Claims 9] Method according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that once the production of the batch of labels is completed, the second list (32) and / or the third list (33) is automatically transmitted to a client (40) of the label manufacturer (30), preferably by EDI. [Claims 10] Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the unique identifier of a label is affiliated with an article (41) of the ready-to-wear type or accessory from the fields of fashion, textiles and clothing, intended to receive the label, and the affiliation is carried out after the control, and before the receipt of the label by its purchaser (10) or by a manufacturer (40). [Claims 11] Method according to claim 9 in combination with claim 10, characterized in that the affiliation is carried out automatically from the EDI file transmitted once the production of the batch of labels is completed. [Claims 12] Installation comprising a label weaving loom, a label cutting machine, control means, and a computer system, and the installation is configured to implement the method according to one of the preceding claims.

Images