Control device, program, and method

The control device and method address the issue of biased evaluation by calculating a comprehensive evaluation index from multiple measurement values, enhancing accuracy through radar chart analysis and time integration.

JP2025151337APending Publication Date: 2025-10-09NEC CORP
View PDF 1 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
JP2024052705
Authority / Receiving Office
JP · JP
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2024-03-28
Publication Date
2025-10-09

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing evaluation methods, such as those described in Patent Document 1, evaluate service quality using individual evaluation values without considering a comprehensive index, leading to biased and reduced accuracy.

Method used

A control device and method that calculates a comprehensive evaluation value by aggregating multiple measurement values related to the quality of an evaluation target, using techniques like radar chart analysis and integration over time to create a more accurate overall evaluation index.

Benefits of technology

Improves the accuracy of quality evaluation by providing a comprehensive evaluation index that considers multiple factors, reducing bias and enhancing precision.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure 2025151337000001_ABST
    Figure 2025151337000001_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

To provide a control device, a program, and a method, by which it is possible to improve evaluation accuracy.SOLUTION: A control device includes: an acquisition part to acquire a measured value set including a plurality of measured values respectively corresponding to a plurality of items related to quality of an evaluation object; and a first calculation part to calculate a total evaluation value that is an overall evaluation index of the measured value set on the basis of the plurality of measured values in the measured value set.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present disclosure relates to a control device, a program, and a method. [Background technology]

[0002] A method has been proposed for evaluating service quality using multiple evaluation values ​​such as traffic flow rate within a network (for example, Patent Document 1). [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] JP 2015-91012 A Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] However, the technology disclosed in Patent Document 1 evaluates quality using each of a plurality of evaluation values ​​individually. In other words, the technology disclosed in Patent Document 1 does not consider a comprehensive evaluation index for the evaluation target. Therefore, the technology disclosed in Patent Document 1 may result in an evaluation that is biased toward a specific evaluation value, which may reduce the evaluation accuracy.

[0005] An object of the present disclosure is to provide a control device, a program, and a method that can improve evaluation accuracy. It should be noted that this object is only one of multiple objects that the multiple embodiments disclosed in this specification aim to achieve. Other objects or problems and novel features will become apparent from the description of this specification or the accompanying drawings. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] The control device of the present disclosure includes: an acquisition unit that acquires a measurement value set including a plurality of measurement values ​​corresponding to a plurality of items related to the quality of the evaluation target; a first calculation unit that calculates a comprehensive evaluation value that is a comprehensive evaluation index of the measurement value set based on a plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; It is equipped with:

[0007] The program of the present disclosure is Obtaining a measurement value set including a plurality of measurement values ​​corresponding to a plurality of items related to the quality of the evaluation target; Calculating an overall evaluation value that is an overall evaluation index of the measurement value set based on the multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; The control device executes a process including the steps of:

[0008] The method of the present disclosure comprises: A method executed by a control device related to the quality of an evaluation object, obtaining a measurement set including a plurality of measurements each corresponding to a plurality of items; Calculating an overall evaluation value that is an overall evaluation index of the measurement value set based on the multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; Includes. [Effects of the Invention]

[0009] The present disclosure makes it possible to provide a control device, a program, and a method that can improve the accuracy of quality evaluation. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0010] [Figure 1] FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a control device according to the present disclosure. [Figure 2] 10 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a processing operation of a control device according to the present disclosure. [Figure 3] FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating another example of a control device according to the present disclosure. [Figure 4] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a radar chart. [Figure 5] 10 is a flowchart illustrating another example of the processing operation of the control device of the present disclosure. [Figure 6]FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating another example of a control device according to the present disclosure. [Figure 7] 10 is a flowchart illustrating another example of the processing operation of the control device of the present disclosure. [Figure 8] FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating another example of a control device according to the present disclosure. [Figure 9] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a control device. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0011] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. In this disclosure, the drawings may relate to one or more embodiments. Furthermore, each element in the drawings may apply to one or more embodiments. In each drawing, the same or corresponding elements are designated by the same reference numerals, and duplicated explanations will be omitted as necessary for clarity of explanation.

[0012] First Embodiment <Example of control device configuration> Fig. 1 is a block diagram showing an example of a control device of the present disclosure. In Fig. 1, the control device 10 has an acquisition unit 11 and a comprehensive evaluation value calculation unit (first calculation unit) 12. For example, the control device 10 may be disposed in a core network device, a network device such as a base station, or a terminal device.

[0013] The acquisition unit 11 acquires a measurement value set. The measurement value set includes a plurality of measurement values ​​corresponding to a plurality of items related to the quality of an evaluation target. The evaluation target may be, for example, a network slice. The plurality of items may be two or more of bandwidth (throughput), delay, congestion, packet loss, line disconnection, and jitter.

[0014] The overall evaluation value calculation unit 12 calculates an overall evaluation value, which is an overall evaluation index for the measurement value set, based on the multiple measurement values ​​in the measurement value set acquired by the acquisition unit 11. For example, the overall evaluation value calculation unit 12 may calculate the sum of the multiple measurement values ​​in the measurement value set as the overall evaluation value.

[0015] <Example of control device operation> FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of the processing operation of the control device of the present disclosure.

[0016] The acquisition unit 11 acquires a measurement value set (step S11).

[0017] The overall evaluation value calculation unit 12 calculates an overall evaluation value, which is an overall evaluation index for the measurement value set, based on the multiple measurement values ​​in the acquired measurement value set (step S12).

[0018] As described above, according to the first embodiment, the overall evaluation value calculation unit 12 in the control device 10 calculates an overall evaluation value, which is an overall evaluation index of the measurement value set, based on multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set acquired by the acquisition unit 11.

[0019] The configuration of the control device 10 makes it possible to calculate a comprehensive evaluation value, which is a comprehensive evaluation index for the evaluation target. By using this comprehensive evaluation value for evaluation, it is possible to improve the accuracy of the evaluation.

[0020] Second Embodiment <Example of control device configuration> 3 is a block diagram showing another example of a control device according to the present disclosure. In FIG. 3, a control device 20 includes an acquisition unit 21 and a comprehensive evaluation value calculation unit (first calculation unit) 22.

[0021] The acquiring unit 21 acquires a measurement value set in the same manner as the acquiring unit 11. However, the number of items corresponding to the measurement values ​​included in the measurement value set is three or more.

[0022] Similar to the overall evaluation value calculation unit 12, the overall evaluation value calculation unit 22 calculates an overall evaluation value, which is an overall evaluation index for the measurement value set, based on the multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set acquired by the acquisition unit 21.

[0023] For example, the comprehensive evaluation value calculation unit 22 includes a radar chart creation unit 22A and an area calculation unit 22B.

[0024] The radar chart creation unit 22A plots a plurality of values ​​corresponding to the plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set on a radar chart having a plurality of axes corresponding to the plurality of items, respectively. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, each axis of the radar chart has a plurality of plot candidate points (e.g., scale 1, scale 2, scale 3, scale 4, and scale 5). The radar chart creation unit 22A may plot the measurement value for each item at a plot candidate point corresponding to the measurement value range that includes the measurement value for each item, based on the correspondence between the plurality of measurement value ranges for each item and the plot point candidates corresponding to each measurement value range. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a radar chart.

[0025] The area calculation unit 22B calculates the area of ​​a figure formed by connecting two adjacent points among the multiple points plotted on the radar chart as the overall evaluation value. For example, the shape of a triangle formed between the two adjacent axes and the area of ​​the triangle are uniquely determined by the scale values ​​of the two points plotted on the two adjacent axes. Therefore, the area calculation unit 22B may store a correspondence relationship between all combinations of the scale values ​​of the two points plotted on the two adjacent axes and the area of ​​the triangle corresponding to each combination. Then, the area calculation unit 22B may use this correspondence relationship to identify the area of ​​the triangle formed between each of the two axes of the radar chart. Then, the area calculation unit 22B may calculate the overall evaluation value by calculating the sum of the areas of all the identified triangles.

[0026] Here, when the number of items corresponding to the measured values ​​included in the measurement value set is four or more, the order of the items may be predetermined according to the following correlation: That is, the correlation between a first item among the multiple items and a second item corresponding to a second axis adjacent to the first axis corresponding to the first item in the radar chart may be higher than the correlation between the first item and a third item corresponding to a third axis not adjacent to the first axis. This makes it possible to increase the weight (contribution) of the two highly correlated items in the overall evaluation value calculated by area calculation unit 22B.

[0027] <Example of control device operation> FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing another example of the processing operation of the control device of the present disclosure.

[0028] The acquisition unit 21 acquires a measurement value set (step S21).

[0029] The radar chart creation unit 22A plots a plurality of values ​​corresponding to the plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set on a radar chart having a plurality of axes corresponding to the plurality of items respectively (step S22).

[0030] The area calculation unit 22B calculates the area of ​​a figure formed by connecting each two adjacent points among the plurality of points plotted on the radar chart as a comprehensive evaluation value (step S23).

[0031] As described above, according to the second embodiment, the radar chart creation unit 22A in the control device 10 plots a plurality of values ​​corresponding to the plurality of measurement values ​​in the measurement value set on a radar chart having a plurality of axes corresponding to the plurality of items, respectively. The area calculation unit 22B calculates the area of ​​a figure formed by connecting each two adjacent points among the plurality of points plotted on the radar chart as the overall evaluation value.

[0032] The configuration of the control device 20 makes it possible to calculate a comprehensive evaluation value, which is a comprehensive evaluation index of the evaluation target, as the area of ​​the radar chart. By using this comprehensive evaluation value for evaluation, it is possible to improve the evaluation accuracy.

[0033] <Modification of the second embodiment> The radar chart creation unit 22A may plot multiple values ​​corresponding to the multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set on multiple radar charts, each having multiple axes corresponding to multiple items and arranged in a different order from one another.The area calculation unit 22B may then calculate the area of ​​a figure formed by connecting two adjacent points among the multiple points plotted on each of the multiple radar charts.The area calculation unit 22B may then calculate the sum or average of the multiple areas calculated for the multiple radar charts as the overall evaluation value.This makes it possible to calculate an overall evaluation value that is less affected by the level of correlation between two items corresponding to two adjacent axes.

[0034] Third Embodiment <Example of control device configuration> 6 is a block diagram showing another example of a control device according to the present disclosure. In FIG. 6, a control device 30 includes an acquisition unit 31, a comprehensive evaluation value calculation unit (first calculation unit) 32, and an integrated value calculation unit 33 (second calculation unit).

[0035] The acquisition unit 31 acquires a plurality of measurement value sets by acquiring a measurement value set at predetermined time intervals over a predetermined period of time. That is, the measurement timings of the plurality of measurement value sets are different from one another.

[0036] The overall evaluation value calculation unit 32 calculates an overall evaluation value for each measurement value set. The method of calculating the overall evaluation value by the overall evaluation value calculation unit 32 may be the same as that used by the above-mentioned overall evaluation value calculation unit 12 or the same as that used by the overall evaluation value calculation unit 22.

[0037] The integrated value calculation unit 33 calculates an integrated overall evaluation value by integrating the multiple overall evaluation values ​​calculated by the overall evaluation value calculation unit 32 for the multiple measurement value sets acquired by the acquisition unit 31.

[0038] Here, the acquisition unit 31 may acquire a set of measurement values ​​at predetermined time intervals for each of a plurality of predetermined periods. The plurality of predetermined periods may be, for example, four periods obtained by dividing 24 hours into six-hour periods (e.g., 0:00 to 6:00, 6:00 to 12:00, 12:00 to 18:00, and 18:00 to 24:00). The overall evaluation value calculation unit 32 may then calculate an overall evaluation value for each set of measurement values ​​for each predetermined period. The integrated value calculation unit 33 may then calculate an integrated overall evaluation value for each predetermined period.

[0039] <Example of control device operation> FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing another example of the processing operation of the control device of the present disclosure.

[0040] The acquisition unit 31 acquires a plurality of measurement value sets that are measured during a predetermined period and are measured at different timings (step S31).

[0041] The overall evaluation value calculation unit 32 calculates an overall evaluation value for each measurement value set (step S32).

[0042] The integrated value calculation unit 33 calculates an integrated overall evaluation value by integrating the multiple overall evaluation values ​​calculated for the multiple measurement value sets (step S33).

[0043] As described above, according to the third embodiment, the integrated value calculation unit 33 in the control device 30 calculates an integrated evaluation value by accumulating multiple overall evaluation values ​​calculated by the overall evaluation value calculation unit 32 for multiple measurement value sets acquired by the acquisition unit 31.

[0044] This configuration of the control device 30 makes it possible to calculate an integrated comprehensive evaluation value, which is an evaluation index that smooths out the effects of instantaneous fluctuations in the comprehensive evaluation value over time for a predetermined period of time. By using this integrated comprehensive evaluation value for evaluation, it is possible to improve the accuracy of the evaluation.

[0045] <Fourth embodiment> 8 is a block diagram showing another example of a control device according to the present disclosure. In FIG. 8, a control device 40 includes an acquisition unit 31, a comprehensive evaluation value calculation unit (first calculation unit) 32, an integrated value calculation unit (second calculation unit) 33, and an evaluation unit 41.

[0046] The evaluation unit 41 evaluates the evaluation object based on the integrated comprehensive evaluation value calculated by the integrated value calculation unit 33. Here, the evaluation object is a network slice. For example, as described above, when the integrated value calculation unit 33 calculates the integrated comprehensive evaluation value for each of a plurality of predetermined periods, the evaluation unit 41 can quantitatively evaluate the network slice by classifying the evaluation value (e.g., level 1 to 10) based on the integrated comprehensive evaluation value for each predetermined period. Specifically, the larger the integrated value, the better the quality of the network slice is considered to be. By doing so, the quality of the network slice can be confirmed at the time each measurement value set is acquired. Note that this may also be applied to determining which time period is appropriate for using a network slice, which network slice should be used, the motivation for changing the network slice settings, etc.

[0047] Here, the network slice is provided to a customer such as a company, etc. If an evaluation result for the network slice for each predetermined period is obtained as described above, a usage fee for the network slice for each predetermined period can be set based on this evaluation result.

[0048] <Other embodiments> FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a control device. In FIG. 9, the control device 100 includes a processor 101, a memory 102, and an interface 103. The processor 101 may be, for example, a microprocessor, a microprocessing unit (MPU), or a central processing unit (CPU). The processor 101 may include multiple processors. The memory 102 is configured by a combination of a volatile memory and a nonvolatile memory. The memory 102 may include storage located away from the processor 101. In this case, the processor 101 may access the memory 102 via an input / output (I / O) interface (not shown).

[0049] The control devices 10, 20, 30, and 40 of the first to fourth embodiments may each have the configuration shown in FIG. 9 . The acquisition units 11, 21, and 31, the comprehensive evaluation value calculation units 12, 22, and 32, the integrated value calculation unit 33, and the evaluation unit 41 of the control devices 10, 20, 30, and 40 of the first to fourth embodiments may be realized by the processor 101 reading and executing a program stored in the memory 102. That is, the control devices 10, 20, 30, and 40 of the first to fourth embodiments can be realized by software. The program can be stored using various types of non-transitory computer-readable media and supplied to a computer. The non-transitory computer-readable media include various types of tangible storage media. Examples of non-transitory computer-readable media include magnetic recording media (e.g., flexible disks, magnetic tapes, hard disk drives), magneto-optical recording media (e.g., magneto-optical disks), CD-ROMs (Read Only Memory), CD-Rs, CD-R / Ws, DVDs (Digital Versatile Discs), semiconductor memories (e.g., mask ROMs, PROMs (Programmable ROMs), EPROMs (Erasable PROMs), flash ROMs, and RAMs (Random Access Memory). The program may also be supplied to a computer by various types of transitory computer-readable media. Examples of transitory computer-readable media include electric signals, optical signals, and electromagnetic waves. The transitory computer-readable medium can supply the program to a computer via a wired communication path such as an electric wire or optical fiber, or via a wireless communication path.

[0050] Alternatively, the acquisition units 11, 21, and 31, the comprehensive evaluation value calculation units 12, 22, and 32, the integrated value calculation unit 33, and the evaluation unit 41 of the control devices 10, 20, 30, and 40 of the first to fourth embodiments may each be realized by dedicated hardware. Furthermore, some or all of the components of each device may be realized by general-purpose or dedicated circuits, processors, etc., or a combination thereof. These may be configured by a single chip, or by multiple chips connected via a bus. Some or all of the components of each device may be realized by a combination of the above-mentioned circuits, etc., and a program.

[0051] The present disclosure is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and may be modified as appropriate without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. In addition, the present disclosure may be implemented by appropriately combining the respective embodiments.

[0052] Some or all of the above embodiments can be described as, but are not limited to, the following supplementary notes. (Appendix 1) an acquisition unit that acquires a measurement value set including a plurality of measurement values ​​corresponding to a plurality of items related to the quality of the evaluation target; a first calculation unit that calculates a comprehensive evaluation value that is a comprehensive evaluation index of the measurement value set based on a plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; A control device comprising: (Appendix 2) the first calculation unit calculates a sum of a plurality of measurement values ​​in the measurement value set as the overall evaluation value; 10. The control device of claim 1. (Appendix 3) the number of items in the plurality of items is three or more; The first calculation unit a radar chart creation unit that plots a plurality of values ​​corresponding to the plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set on a radar chart having a plurality of axes corresponding to the plurality of items, respectively; an area calculation unit that calculates, as the comprehensive evaluation value, an area of ​​a figure formed by connecting each two adjacent points among the plurality of points plotted on the radar chart; Equipped with 10. The control device of claim 1. (Appendix 4) the number of items in the plurality of items is four or more; a correlation between a first item among the plurality of items and a second item corresponding to a second axis adjacent to a first axis corresponding to the first item in the radar chart is higher than a correlation between the first item and a third item corresponding to a third axis not adjacent to the first axis; 4. The control device of claim 3. (Appendix 5) Each axis of the radar chart has a plurality of plot candidate points; the radar chart creation unit plots the measured value of each item at a candidate plot point corresponding to a measurement value range that includes the measured value of each item, based on a correspondence relationship between a plurality of measurement value ranges for each item and candidate plot points corresponding to each measurement value range. 4. The control device of claim 3. (Appendix 6) The first calculation unit a radar chart creation unit that plots a plurality of values ​​corresponding to the plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set on each of a plurality of radar charts, each of which has a plurality of axes corresponding to the plurality of items, and the arrangement order of the axes differs from one another; an area calculation unit that calculates the area of ​​a figure formed by connecting two adjacent points among the plurality of points plotted for each of the plurality of radar charts, and calculates the sum or average of the plurality of areas calculated for the plurality of radar charts as the comprehensive evaluation value; Equipped with 10. The control device of claim 1. (Appendix 7) the acquisition unit acquires a plurality of measurement value sets by acquiring the measurement value sets at predetermined time intervals over a predetermined period of time; the first calculation unit calculates the overall evaluation value for each measurement value set; The control device further includes a second calculation unit that calculates an integrated comprehensive evaluation value by integrating the multiple comprehensive evaluation values ​​calculated for the multiple measurement value sets. 7. The control device according to any one of claims 1 to 6. (Appendix 8) The plurality of items are two or more of bandwidth, delay, congestion, packet loss, line disconnection, and fluctuation. 7. The control device according to any one of claims 1 to 6. (Appendix 9) The evaluation target is a network slice. 7. The control device according to any one of claims 1 to 6. (Appendix 10) The evaluation target is a network slice, The control device further includes an evaluation unit that evaluates the network slice based on the integrated comprehensive evaluation value. 8. The control device of claim 7. (Appendix 11) Obtaining a measurement value set including a plurality of measurement values ​​corresponding to a plurality of items related to the quality of the evaluation target; Calculating an overall evaluation value that is an overall evaluation index of the measurement value set based on the multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; A program that causes a control device to execute a process including the above. (Appendix 12) A method executed by a control device related to the quality of an evaluation object, obtaining a measurement set including a plurality of measurements each corresponding to a plurality of items; Calculating an overall evaluation value that is an overall evaluation index of the measurement value set based on the multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; A method comprising:

[0053] Some or all of the elements (e.g., configurations and functions) described in Supplementary Notes 2 to 10 that are dependent on Supplementary Note 1 may also be dependent on Supplementary Notes 11 and 12 in the same dependency relationship as Supplementary Notes 2 to 10. Some or all of the elements described in any Supplementary Note may be applied to various hardware, software, recording means for recording software, systems, and methods. [Explanation of symbols]

[0054] 10 Control device 11 Acquisition Department 12. Comprehensive evaluation value calculation unit (first calculation unit) 20 Control device 21 Acquisition Department 22 Comprehensive evaluation value calculation unit (first calculation unit) 22A Radar chart creation section 22B Area calculation part 30 Control device 31 Acquisition Department 32 Comprehensive evaluation value calculation unit (first calculation unit) 33 Integrated value calculation unit (second calculation unit) 40 Control device 41 Evaluation Department

Claims

1. an acquisition unit that acquires a measurement value set including a plurality of measurement values ​​corresponding to a plurality of items related to the quality of the evaluation target; a first calculation unit that calculates a comprehensive evaluation value that is a comprehensive evaluation index of the measurement value set based on a plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; A control device comprising:

2. the first calculation unit calculates a sum of a plurality of measurement values ​​in the measurement value set as the overall evaluation value; The control device according to claim 1 .

3. the number of items in the plurality of items is three or more; The first calculation unit a radar chart creation unit that plots a plurality of values ​​corresponding to the plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set on a radar chart having a plurality of axes corresponding to the plurality of items, respectively; an area calculation unit that calculates, as the comprehensive evaluation value, an area of ​​a figure formed by connecting two adjacent points among the plurality of points plotted on the radar chart; Equipped with The control device according to claim 1 .

4. the number of items in the plurality of items is four or more; a correlation between a first item among the plurality of items and a second item corresponding to a second axis adjacent to a first axis corresponding to the first item in the radar chart is higher than a correlation between the first item and a third item corresponding to a third axis not adjacent to the first axis; The control device according to claim 3.

5. Each axis of the radar chart has a plurality of plot candidate points; the radar chart creation unit plots the measured value of each item at a candidate plot point corresponding to a measurement value range that includes the measured value of each item, based on a correspondence relationship between a plurality of measurement value ranges for each item and candidate plot points corresponding to each measurement value range. The control device according to claim 3.

6. The first calculation unit a radar chart creation unit that plots a plurality of values ​​corresponding to the plurality of measurement values ​​of the measurement value set on each of a plurality of radar charts, each of which has a plurality of axes corresponding to the plurality of items, and the arrangement order of the axes differs from one another; an area calculation unit that calculates the area of ​​a figure formed by connecting two adjacent points among the plurality of points plotted for each of the plurality of radar charts, and calculates the sum or average of the plurality of areas calculated for the plurality of radar charts as the comprehensive evaluation value; Equipped with The control device according to claim 1 .

7. the acquisition unit acquires a plurality of measurement value sets by acquiring the measurement value sets at predetermined time intervals over a predetermined period of time; the first calculation unit calculates the overall evaluation value for each measurement value set; the control device further includes a second calculation unit that calculates an integrated comprehensive evaluation value by integrating the multiple comprehensive evaluation values ​​calculated for the multiple measurement value sets. The control device according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

8. The plurality of items are two or more of bandwidth, delay, congestion, packet loss, line disconnection, and fluctuation. A control device according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

9. Obtaining a measurement value set including a plurality of measurement values ​​corresponding to a plurality of items related to the quality of the evaluation target; Calculating an overall evaluation value that is an overall evaluation index of the measurement value set based on the multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; A program that causes a control device to execute a process including the above.

10. A method executed by a control device related to the quality of an evaluation object, obtaining a measurement set including a plurality of measurements each corresponding to a plurality of items; Calculating an overall evaluation value that is an overall evaluation index of the measurement value set based on the multiple measurement values ​​of the measurement value set; A method comprising:

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • JP91012A