Program, method, and information processing apparatus

The program and method provide period-specific evaluation criteria based on monthly age divisions to accurately assess students' athletic abilities, addressing discrepancies in age-based evaluations and enhancing motivation through detailed and fair scoring.

JP2026023661AActive Publication Date: 2026-02-13PESTALOZZI TECH CO LTD
View PDF 7 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
JP2024125748
Authority / Receiving Office
JP · JP
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2024-08-01
Publication Date
2026-02-13
Estimated Expiration
2044-08-01

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing scoring systems for physical fitness tests in educational institutions evaluate students' athletic abilities based on age-specific criteria, which may not accurately reflect individual growth periods, leading to potential discrepancies in evaluations.

Method used

A program and method that generate period-specific evaluation criteria based on monthly age divisions, allowing for detailed evaluation of students' athletic abilities by considering their birth dates and dividing the school year into sections containing one or more months, with the ability to display evaluations through teacher and student terminals.

Benefits of technology

Enables a more accurate and detailed assessment of students' athletic abilities by using period-specific evaluation criteria, allowing for higher evaluations for students who might otherwise receive lower yearly scores, thereby enhancing motivation and understanding of individual growth.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure 2026023661000001_ABST
    Figure 2026023661000001_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

To evaluate the motor ability of a student in detail.SOLUTION: A computer is caused to execute: acquiring student information that includes information indicating the birth month and year of a plurality of students; acquiring measurement information that is the result of a physical fitness measurement of the plurality of students; generating, for each of predetermined periods in which the measurement information is aggregated, period-specific reference information that serves as a reference for the evaluation of the measurement information in each of the predetermined periods, on the basis of period-specific measurement information in which the measurement information is aggregated, in the school year of the students belonging to a plurality of classes including one or more months; and generating period-specific evaluation information in which the result of the physical fitness measurement of each of the plurality of students is evaluated according to the age of the student, on the basis of the period-specific reference information, the measurement information, and the information indicating the birth month and year of each of the plurality of students.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a program, a method, and an information processing device. [Background technology]

[0002] Educational institutions need to keep track of the grades and evaluations of their students, and these are often recorded electronically using information processing devices. In particular, physical fitness tests are conducted to measure the students' performance in sports. The measurement results are used to evaluate the students' athletic abilities. For example, in the invention described in Cited Document 1, in order to identify games suitable for improving a child's athletic ability, physical fitness measurement data including multiple events obtained through a physical fitness test is converted into scores for each event based on a predetermined score sheet. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Publication No. 2023-84163 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] In the scoring system used in Reference 1, scores are assigned according to the measurements. The final physical fitness test evaluation in elementary, junior high, or high schools is conducted using age-specific evaluation criteria based on the total score converted from the measurements of each subject. These evaluation criteria are established as age-specific evaluation criteria. For example, if a student in a certain grade was born earlier in the year, there is a possibility that he or she will be evaluated lower than students in the same grade due to differences in the students' growth periods. In this way, if evaluation is conducted according to age-specific criteria, it cannot be said that the students' athletic abilities are evaluated in detail according to the students' growth.

[0005] Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a program, a method, and an information processing device that are capable of evaluating a student's athletic ability in detail. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] A program according to one aspect of the present disclosure causes a computer to perform the following operations: acquire student information including information indicating the birth dates of multiple students; acquire measurement information that is the results of physical fitness tests of the multiple students; generate period-specific standard information that serves as an evaluation standard for the measurement information for each period, based on period-specific measurement information in which the measurement information is compiled for each of specified periods that are divided into sections containing one or more months based on the monthly ages of students in a school year to which the multiple students belong; and generate period-specific evaluation information in which the results of the physical fitness tests of each of the multiple students are evaluated according to the monthly ages of the students, based on the period-specific standard information, the measurement information, and information indicating the birth dates of each of the multiple students.

[0007] According to this aspect, period-specific evaluation information is generated as the evaluation criteria for the measurement information for each period based on the period-specific measurement information for periods in which the student's monthly age is divided into predetermined categories. The period-specific evaluation information is generated based on the period-specific evaluation information, the measurement information, and information indicating the year and month of birth. This makes it possible to evaluate students based on their monthly age rather than on a yearly basis. For example, a student who is younger in the same grade, i.e., whose month of birth falls in the latter half of the grade, can be evaluated using evaluation criteria based on the physical fitness test results of other students born around the same time as the student. This makes it possible to evaluate the student's athletic ability in detail.

[0008] In the above aspect, the computer may further be configured to make information about multiple students and period-specific evaluation information for each of the multiple students viewable through a teacher terminal, and to generate screen information for a teacher screen in which information about students with high evaluations for each period is highlighted based on the period-specific evaluation information.

[0009] This allows teachers to understand that a student who received a relatively low evaluation in the yearly evaluation will receive a higher evaluation when evaluated by period, making it possible to evaluate the student's athletic ability in detail.

[0010] In the above aspect, the computer may further be configured to generate screen information for a student screen that enables information about a target student among multiple students and period-specific evaluation information of the target student to be viewed through the student terminal of the target student.

[0011] This allows students to view their own evaluations by period, which are different from the evaluation by year. For example, if a student receives a relatively low evaluation by year, but receives a higher evaluation by period than the evaluation by year, this can lead to increased motivation for the student.

[0012] In the above aspect, the computer may further be configured to generate annual evaluation information for the results of physical fitness tests based on annual standard information for evaluating measurement information on an annual basis, and to generate screen information for a comparison screen that allows the period-based evaluation information and annual evaluation information of each of multiple students to be compared and viewed.

[0013] This allows students, teachers, parents, etc. to compare and view the yearly and periodic evaluations. For example, students, teachers, parents, etc. can understand that even if the yearly evaluation is low, the periodic evaluation will be higher than the yearly evaluation.

[0014] In the above aspect, the predetermined period may be divided according to the grade to which the plurality of students belong.

[0015] This allows for, for example, dividing the period into one-month increments for the lower grades of elementary school, where changes in athletic ability are large as the student grows, and dividing into three-month increments for the lower grades and higher grades, where changes in athletic ability are relatively small, thereby enabling a detailed evaluation of the student's athletic ability.

[0016] In the above aspect, the measurement information may include the results of the physical fitness test for each event, the period-specific standard information may be generated for each event, and the period-specific evaluation information may be generated for each event based on the period-specific standard information for each event.

[0017] By dividing the period-specific standard information by event, it becomes possible to evaluate each event by period, which makes it possible to evaluate the student's athletic ability in detail.

[0018] A method according to another aspect of the present disclosure includes a computer acquiring student information including information indicating the birth dates of a plurality of students, acquiring measurement information that is the results of physical fitness tests of the plurality of students, generating period-specific standard information that serves as an evaluation standard for the measurement information for each of the periods based on period-specific measurement information in which the measurement information is aggregated for each of specified periods that are divided into sections each including one or more months based on the monthly ages of students in a school year to which the plurality of students belong, and generating period-specific evaluation information in which the results of the physical fitness tests of each of the plurality of students are evaluated according to the monthly ages of the students based on the period-specific standard information, the measurement information, and information indicating the birth dates of each of the plurality of students.

[0019] An information processing device according to another aspect of the present disclosure includes a student information acquisition unit that acquires student information including information indicating the birth dates of multiple students; a measurement information acquisition unit that acquires measurement information that is the results of physical fitness tests of the multiple students; a standard information generation unit that generates period-specific standard information that serves as an evaluation standard for the measurement information for each period based on period-specific measurement information in which the measurement information is aggregated for each of specified periods that are divided into sections containing one or more months and that indicate the monthly ages of students in a school year to which the multiple students belong; and a period-specific evaluation information generation unit that generates period-specific evaluation information in which the results of the physical fitness tests of each of the multiple students are evaluated according to the student's monthly age based on the period-specific standard information, the measurement information, and information indicating the birth date of each of the multiple students. [Effects of the Invention]

[0020] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a program, a method, and an information processing device that are capable of evaluating a student's athletic ability in detail. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0021] [Figure 1] 1 is a schematic diagram of an evaluation information generation system according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 2] 1 is a block diagram of an evaluation information generating device according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 3] FIG. 10 is a diagram for schematically explaining generation of period-based evaluation information. [Figure 4] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a reference according to the present embodiment. [Figure 5] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of processing in the evaluation information generation system according to the present embodiment. [Figure 6] 10 is an example of a student information registration screen according to the present embodiment. [Figure 7] 10 is an example of student information according to the present embodiment. [Figure 8] 10 is an example of a measurement information input screen according to the present embodiment. [Figure 9] 10 is an example of measurement information according to the present embodiment. [Figure 10] 10 is an example of period-based reference information according to the present embodiment. [Figure 11] 10 is an example of yearly reference information according to the present embodiment. [Figure 12] 10 is an example of evaluation information according to the present embodiment. [Figure 13] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of processing in the evaluation information generation system according to the present embodiment. [Figure 14] 10 is an example of a student screen according to the present embodiment. [Figure 15] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of processing in the evaluation information generation system according to the present embodiment. [Figure 16] 10 is an example of a teacher screen according to the present embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0022] DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the same reference numerals denote the same or similar components.

[0023] 1 shows a schematic diagram of an evaluation information generation system 10 according to this embodiment. The evaluation information generation system 10 includes an evaluation information generation device 101, student terminals 201a, 201b, and 201c, and teacher terminals 301a and 301b. These terminals, devices, and servers are communicatively connected via a network N. Although there are multiple student terminals and teacher terminals, such as student terminals 201a, 201b, and 201c and teacher terminals 301a and 301b, they will be simply referred to as student terminal 201 and teacher terminal 301 when there is no need to distinguish between them.

[0024] The evaluation information generating device 101 is a server that evaluates and records the results of physical fitness tests based on the information of the physical fitness tests of students recorded via the student terminal 201. The information recorded in the evaluation information generating device 101 can be viewed by students and teachers via the student terminal 201 and the teacher terminal 301. The information recorded in the evaluation information generating device 101 can also be viewed by an information processing terminal other than the student terminal 201 and the teacher terminal 301, for example, operated by a student's guardian. The configuration of the evaluation information generating device 101 will be described later.

[0025] The student terminal 201 is a terminal operated by a student, and is, for example, an information processing device such as a personal computer, smartphone, or tablet terminal that stores browsing software that can access the evaluation information generation device 101 via the network N. The student terminal 201 is provided to each student, for example, by an educational institution such as a school distributing it to each student.

[0026] The teacher terminal 301 is a terminal operated by a teacher, and is, for example, an information processing device such as a personal computer, smartphone, or tablet terminal that stores browsing software that can access the evaluation information generation device 101 via the network N.

[0027] In the evaluation information generation system 10, the evaluation information generation device 101 generates evaluation criteria for evaluating the results of a student's physical fitness measurement (physical fitness test) based on measurement information, which is the result of a student's physical fitness measurement (physical fitness test), acquired from the student terminal 201 or the teacher terminal 301. To take the student's age into consideration, the evaluation information generation device 101 generates evaluation criteria (period-specific evaluation criteria) for each predetermined period in which the student's age in the school year to which the student belongs is divided into sections containing one or more months. For example, if students in the first grade of elementary school are students born from April 2017 to March 2018, the evaluation information generation device 101 generates evaluation criteria for the first grade students, for each of students born in April 2017 to March of the following year. Since the school year generally starts in April, the start of the period is set to April and the end of the period is set to March of the following year, but the start and end months of the school year can be set arbitrarily.

[0028] The evaluation information generating device 101 evaluates the physical fitness test results according to the student's age in months based on the period-specific evaluation criteria. For example, for a student in the first grade born in April 2017, an evaluation of the physical fitness test results (period-specific evaluation information) is generated based on the period-specific evaluation criteria generated for students born in the same month and year.

[0029] Each unit of the evaluation information generation device 101 will be described with reference to Fig. 2. The evaluation information generation system 10 has a communication unit 1011, a storage unit 1012, a student information acquisition unit 1013, a measurement information acquisition unit 1014, a reference information generation unit 1015, a period-based evaluation information generation unit 1016, a year-based evaluation information generation unit 1017, and a screen information generation unit 1018.

[0030] Each unit of the evaluation information generation device 101 can be realized in a server device by a communication device, a storage device, and a processor that executes a program stored in the storage device.

[0031] The communication unit 1011 controls communication between the evaluation information generation device 101 and devices external to the evaluation information generation device 101 , including the student terminal 201 and the teacher terminal 301 .

[0032] The storage unit 1012 acquires various types of information used in the processing in the evaluation information generation device 101. The storage unit 1012 has a student information DB 10121, a measurement information DB 10122, a reference information DB 10123, and an evaluation information DB 10124. The information stored in the storage unit 1012 will be described later.

[0033] The student information acquisition unit 1013 acquires student information including information indicating the birth dates of multiple students. The student information acquisition unit 1013 receives student information uploaded from, for example, the teacher terminal 301 and stores the acquired information in the student information DB 10121. Here, the information indicating the birth date is, for example, the birth date itself, the date of birth, or information on the student's grade and month of birth, and is information that can identify the student's birth date. Determining the birth year for a pair of grade and month of birth will be described below. For example, a student in the first grade of elementary school in 2024 will be born in 2017 or 2018. The student information acquisition unit 1013 can identify the student's birth year based on the grade and month of birth included in the acquired student information and the year at the time of acquisition. In addition, if the first grade of elementary school is defined as "those born between April 2, 2017 and April 1, 2018," the year of birth may be distinguished by further associating information to identify students born on April 1, 2018 with the student information.

[0034] The measurement information acquisition unit 1014 acquires measurement information, which is the results of physical fitness tests of multiple students. For example, the measurement information acquisition unit 1014 acquires the measurement information by having the students access a web page for recording measurement results provided by the evaluation information generation device 101 via the student terminal 201 and acquiring the measurement results entered by each student via the web page. Alternatively, the measurement information acquisition unit 1014 acquires the measurement information by acquiring the measurement results of each student from the teacher terminal 301. Note that the measurement information acquisition unit 1014 may also acquire measurement information recorded in a server for recording measurement information other than that of the evaluation information generation device 101 by accessing another measurement information recording server.

[0035] The reference information generating unit 1015 generates period-specific reference information that serves as an evaluation standard for the measurement information for each period, based on period-specific measurement information in which measurement information is aggregated for each predetermined period obtained by dividing the monthly ages of students in a school year to which multiple students belong into sections each including one or more months. For example, the reference information generating unit 1015 acquires information indicating the birth month of each student acquired by the student information acquiring unit 1013 and the measurement information of multiple students belonging to the school year acquired by the measurement information acquiring unit 1014.

[0036] The reference information generating unit 1015 tally the measurement information according to the age divisions in months. For example, as shown in Fig. 3, if the age divisions for first-grade elementary school students are set in units of one month, the reference information generating unit 1015 tally the measurement information for each of multiple students born in January through December, based on information indicating the student's birth month.

[0037] The age divisions for tabulation and subsequent generation of evaluation standards do not have to be monthly, and may be quarterly divisions such as "born in April to June," "born in July to September," "born in October to December," and "born in January to March." The evaluation information generation device 101 acquires information for setting age divisions from a user (e.g., a teacher or administrator), such as information indicating a setting of monthly or quarterly units, and tabulates the measurement information and generates standard information based on the set divisions.

[0038] The reference information generation unit 1015 aggregates the measurement information by item. For example, in FIG. 3, as exemplified by "grip strength" and "handball throw", the measurement information is aggregated for each item of "grip strength", "sit-up", "seated forward bend", "alternate side step", "20m shuttle run", "50m run", "standing broad jump", and "softball throw". The aggregation of the measurement information can be performed across a plurality of schools from which the evaluation information generation device 101 acquires the measurement information. This can avoid a decrease in the number of samples due to further division of one year into monthly units and improve the accuracy of the evaluation. Also, the range of schools to be aggregated may be changeable by municipality, prefecture, or nationwide unit.

[0039] Based on the aggregated measurement information by month age, the reference information generation unit 1015 generates period-based reference information that serves as the evaluation criteria for the measurement information of students of each month age. Specifically, the reference information generation unit 1015 assumes that the measurement information follows a normal distribution and calculates the mean value and standard deviation of the measured values. An evaluation is performed based on the measured value V of the student to be evaluated, the mean value M, and the standard deviation SD.

[0040] For example, as shown in FIG. 4, when the "measured value range" is "V < M - 2SD", the criterion is to evaluate as "E". Similarly, for the measured value V, when "M - 2SD ≤ V < M - SD", the evaluation is "D", when "M - SD ≤ V < M", the evaluation is "C", when "M ≤ V < M + SD", the evaluation is "B", when "M + SD ≤ V < M + 2SD", the evaluation is "A", and when "M + 2SD < V", the evaluation is "S". Such criteria are stored in the evaluation information generation device 101.

[0041] As a combination of the mean value and standard deviation of the measured values by category calculated by the reference information generation unit 1015 and the criteria shown in FIG. 4, period-based reference information that serves as the evaluation criteria for the measurement information of students of each month age is generated. Note that the criteria as shown in FIG. 4 can be different for each item, for example, and can be set by teachers, administrators, etc. who use the evaluation information generation device 101.

[0042] The period-based evaluation information generation unit 1016 generates period-based evaluation information in which the results of physical fitness tests for each of the multiple students are evaluated according to the student's age in months, based on the period-based standard information, measurement information, and information indicating the birth date of each of the multiple students. For example, when evaluating students born in January of the first year, the period-based evaluation information generation unit 1016 refers to the measurement information DB 10122 and acquires measurement information for the student's physical fitness test. The period-based evaluation information generation unit 1016 refers to the standard information DB 10123 and acquires period-based standard information corresponding to students born in January of the first year. The period-based evaluation information generation unit 1016 generates period-based evaluation information by evaluating the measurement values ​​included in the measurement information of the target students based on the period-based standard information. The period-based evaluation information generation unit 1016 updates the evaluation information DB 10124 using the generated period-based evaluation information.

[0043] The annual evaluation information generation unit 1017 generates annual evaluation information for the results of physical fitness tests based on annual standard information for evaluating the measurement information on an annual basis. The annual standard information is, for example, as described below, a standard established by age for the total value of the converted scores obtained by converting the measurement values ​​of each event using a score sheet that assigns points according to the measurement values. The annual standard information is stored, for example, in the standard information DB 10123. The annual evaluation information generation unit 1017 converts the measurement values ​​into scores and generates an evaluation from the total score based on the annual standard information and the measurement information of the student to be evaluated. The annual evaluation information generation unit 1017 updates the evaluation information DB 10124 using the generated annual evaluation information.

[0044] The screen information generation unit 1018 generates screen information for students, teachers, parents, etc. to view student measurement information and evaluation information via the student terminal 201, the teacher terminal 301, or another terminal. The screen information generation unit 1018 generates screen information for a teacher screen that makes information about multiple students and period-based evaluation information for each of the multiple students viewable via the teacher terminal 301, and highlights information about students with high evaluations for each period based on the period-based evaluation information. Alternatively, the screen information generation unit 1018 generates screen information for a student screen that makes information about a target student among multiple students and the target student's period-based evaluation information viewable via the target student's student terminal 201. Alternatively, it generates screen information for a comparison screen that makes it possible to compare and view the period-based evaluation information and year-based evaluation information for each of multiple students. Note that the function provided by the comparison screen may be included in the teacher screen or the student screen.

[0045] The processing performed by the evaluation information generating device 101 will be described with reference to FIG.

[0046] In step S501, the student information acquisition unit 1013 acquires student information from the teacher terminal 301. For example, the student information acquisition unit 1013 acquires the student information when the teacher uploads the student information via a student information registration screen 601 displayed on the teacher terminal 301 as shown in FIG. 6. The student information acquisition unit 1013 acquires the student information via an upload screen (not shown) that is displayed when the student registration button 6011 on the student information registration screen 601 is selected. The student information acquisition unit 1013 stores the acquired student information in the student information DB 10121.

[0047] FIG. 7 shows an example of student information in the student information DB 10121. The student information includes information such as "school information," "grade information," "attendance number," "student name," "date and month of birth," and "gender." The "school information" field stores information about the school to which the student belongs. The "grade information" field stores information about the grade and class to which the student belongs. The "attendance number" field stores the attendance number assigned to the student. The "date and month of birth" field stores the date and month of birth of the student. The "gender" field stores the gender of the student. For example, in the student information shown in FIG. 7, for Class A of Year 1 of School A, the date and month of birth of the student with attendance number "1" is stored as "February 2018" in the format of "year and month of birth" and the gender is "male." As another example, the date and month of birth of the student with attendance number "5" is stored as "April 2017" and the gender is "female." The birth month and year may be stored in the format of, for example, date of birth, such as "born on July X, 2017." The birth month and year in the student information may also be stored as a pair of the school year and the birth month.

[0048] The student information DB10121 is constructed by, for example, having information for each group uploaded to the evaluation information generating device 101 by a person in charge, such as a homeroom teacher for each group, at each of a plurality of schools, and accumulating the information for each grade and each school. The viewable range of the information stored in the student information DB10121 can be managed, for example, by school, grade, class, or student.

[0049] In step S502, the measurement information acquisition unit 1014 acquires measurement information, which is the results of the physical fitness test of each student, stored in the student information DB 10121. The measurement information is information including measurement values ​​for each physical fitness test event. The measurement information acquisition unit 1014 acquires the results of the physical fitness test of each student, which each student uploads by accessing the evaluation information generation device 101 through their own student terminal 201. The evaluation information generation device 101 acquires the measurement information through a measurement information input screen 801 displayed on the student terminal 201, for example, by logging in to the evaluation information generation device 101 by entering their own ID or passcode. The student enters the results of the physical fitness test in an input field such as the input field 8011 and transmits it to the evaluation information generation device 101. The input field is provided for each event. In addition, the measurement information may be entered or modified through the teacher terminal 301 by a teacher who logs in to the evaluation information generation device 101 by entering their own ID or passcode. The measurement information is associated with the student information and stored in the measurement information DB 10122. The measurement information is recorded for multiple students in multiple grades, and measurement results from multiple schools are recorded. Note that the measurement information acquisition unit 1014 may access other information processing devices that record measurement information and acquire the measurement information.

[0050] 9 shows an example of measurement information stored in the measurement information DB 10122. The measurement information is stored for each of the following events: "grip strength," "sit-ups," "sit-forward bends," "repeated side jumps," "20m shuttle run," "50m sprint," "standing long jump," and "softball throw." For example, it is stored that the grip strength of a student in class A, first grade, with attendance number "1" is "9 kg," and as another example, it is stored that the grip strength of a student with attendance number "5" is "10 kg."

[0051] In step S503, the reference information generating unit 1015 generates period-specific reference information based on the student information and the measurement information. For example, the reference information generating unit 1015 acquires the measurement values ​​of each subject of students in the first year by referring to the measurement information DB 10122, and aggregates the measurement values ​​by birth month based on the information indicating the birth year and month associated with the measurement information. The measurement values ​​may be aggregated by gender. The reference information generating unit 1015 generates period-specific reference information including the average value and standard deviation of the aggregated measurement values ​​for each category, and stores the information in the reference information DB 10123.

[0052] FIG. 10 shows an example of period-specific reference information in the reference information DB 10123 for first through sixth grades of elementary school. In FIG. 10, statistical values ​​based on measurements taken from first through sixth grades of elementary school for the "grip strength" event are stored by gender. Period-specific reference information is similarly generated and stored for other events. Period-specific reference information that serves as an evaluation standard for the measurement information of students of each age is generated by combining statistical values ​​including the average value and standard deviation for each age group shown in FIG. 10 with the standards described with reference to FIG. 4.

[0053] For example, for first-grade elementary school students with a gender of "male" and born in "April," the average weight is stored as 9.5 (kg) and the standard deviation is stored as 2.10. Similarly, for first-grade elementary school students with a gender of "female" and born in "April," the average weight is stored as 8.7 (kg) and the standard deviation is stored as 2.11. The average and standard deviation of the measured values ​​are calculated for each month of birth. Similarly, for second-grade elementary school students, the average and standard deviation are calculated for each month of age.

[0054] Here, the age divisions used as the unit of aggregation are not limited to months, but may be quarters, for example. As shown in the example of Fig. 10, for students in the third grade of elementary school, the measurement information is aggregated into quarterly divisions such as "born April to June," "born July to September," "born October to December," and "born January to March," and the average value and standard deviation are calculated. The evaluation criteria based on the deviation value can be the same as those for the first grade of elementary school, as explained with reference to Fig. 4.

[0055] By making it possible to change the classification according to grade level, for example, in the first or second grade of elementary school, where changes in athletic ability are large as students grow, the average and standard deviation can be calculated in one-month increments, while in grades from the third grade onward, where changes in athletic ability are relatively small, the period can be divided into three-month increments. This allows for detailed evaluation of athletic ability according to the student's level of growth. Furthermore, the classification for evaluation can be set arbitrarily, such as in four-month increments, six-month increments, or "born April to December" or "born January to March." The settings are stored, for example, when a teacher or administrator using the evaluation information generation device 101 transmits setting information to the evaluation information generation device 101.

[0056] In step S504, the period-specific assessment information generation unit 1016 generates period-specific assessment information based on the period-specific standard information for each student's measurement information. The period-specific assessment information generation unit 1016 generates period-specific assessment information using the generated period-specific assessment standard and updates the assessment information DB 10124. The generation of assessment information will be described later.

[0057] In step S505, the annual evaluation information generation unit 1017 generates annual evaluation information based on the annual standard information for each student's measurement information. An example of the annual standard information is shown in FIG. 11. The annual standard information includes item score tables T1 and T2 that convert measurement values ​​into scores for each subject and gender, and a comprehensive evaluation standard table T3 that determines an evaluation based on the scores by age. For example, based on the measurement values ​​of each subject in a student's physical fitness test, the measurement values ​​are converted into scores using the item score table T1 or T2. A final evaluation (level) is determined using the comprehensive evaluation standard table T3 based on the total of the converted scores. The annual evaluation information generation unit 1017 generates annual evaluation information as scores for each subject using the annual evaluation standard, and updates the evaluation information DB 10124.

[0058] The generation of period-specific evaluation information and year-specific evaluation information will be described with reference to Fig. 12. Fig. 12 shows an example in which "period-specific evaluation" and "score" are recorded when the grip strengths of students in Class A, Year 1, with attendance numbers "1" to "6" are "9kg", "11kg", "11kg", "8kg", "10kg", and "10kg".

[0059] Period-specific evaluation information for the student with attendance number "1" in Class A, Year 1 is generated as follows. The period-specific evaluation information generation unit 1016 references the "year and month of birth" information of the student to be evaluated. This student was born in 2018 and in February. When identifying the year of birth based on the school year and month of birth, the information on the student's school year and month of birth is referenced, and the year of birth is identified based on the information on the school year.

[0060] The period-specific evaluation information generating unit 1016 references the period-specific standard information for a student in the first grade of elementary school who is "male" and born in "February." In the example of FIG. 10, the average value is "7.74" (unit: kg) and the standard deviation is "2.02." The measured weight of the student is "9 kg." These values ​​are used to perform an evaluation based on the standard explained with reference to FIG. 4. Based on the standard, 7.74 (M) ≦ 9 (V) < 9.76 (M + SD), so the period-specific evaluation is generated as "B." Furthermore, the yearly evaluation is "4" based on the item-specific score sheet of FIG. 11.

[0061] Similarly, period-specific evaluation information for a student with attendance number "2" in Class A of the first year is generated as follows. The period-specific evaluation information generation unit 1016 references period-specific standard information for a first-year elementary school student whose gender is "male" and whose birth month is "August." The average value is "9.91" and the standard deviation is "2.36." The measured value of the student is "11 kg." Based on the standard described with reference to FIG. 4, 9.91 (M) ≦ 11 (V) < 12.27 (M + SD), so the period-specific evaluation is generated as "B." Based on the item-specific score sheet of FIG. 11, the yearly evaluation is "5." Period-specific evaluation information for a student with attendance number "3" in Class A of the first year is generated in the same way (average value: 9.01, standard deviation: 2.70, measured value: 12 kg). In this case, the period-specific evaluation is "A" and the score is "5." Similarly, period-specific evaluations and scores are generated for students in Class A, Year 1, with attendance numbers "4" to "6."

[0062] As shown in Figure 12, the measurement of the student with attendance number "1" in Class A, Year 1, is "9 kg," and the periodic evaluation is "B," with a score of "4." The measurement of the student with attendance number "2" is "11 kg," and the periodic evaluation is "B," with a score of "5." Here, the student with attendance number "1" and the student with attendance number "2" have a higher score based on the annual evaluation criteria. However, when evaluations are conducted based on the periodic evaluation criteria, both students receive a periodic evaluation of "B." This is because each student's evaluation was conducted on students who had the same month of birth as them. By conducting periodic evaluations in this way, it is possible to provide an appropriate evaluation, taking into account their age, even for students who would receive a low evaluation based on the annual evaluation criteria.

[0063] The measurement of the student with attendance number "3" is "12kg", the periodic evaluation is "A", and the score is "5". When comparing the student with attendance number "2" and the student with attendance number "3", both have scores of "5". However, when looking at the periodic evaluation, the periodic evaluation of the student with attendance number "3" is "A", while the periodic evaluation of the student with attendance number "3" is "B". This means that the student with attendance number "3" recorded a higher measurement compared to students born at the same time. By performing periodic evaluation in this way, it is possible to identify students with higher abilities even if the scores in the annual evaluation are the same.

[0064] By evaluating students according to their age in months, rather than by year, for example, students in the same grade who were born in the latter half of the school year (students with younger ages in months) can be evaluated based on the assessment criteria based on the physical fitness test results of other students born around the same time. This makes it possible to evaluate students' athletic abilities in detail.

[0065] 13 and 14, the viewing of evaluations by the student terminal 201 will be described. In step S1301, the student terminal 201 logs in to the evaluation information generation device 101 and transmits a request for a student screen to the evaluation information generation device 101. In step S1302, the screen information generation unit 1018 generates student screen information for displaying the student screen on the student terminal 201. The generation of the student screen information is performed, for example, by referencing the evaluation information of the student identified when logging in to the evaluation information generation device 101 and based on the evaluation information of the target student. In step S1303, the screen information generation unit 1018 transmits the student screen information to the student terminal 201. In step S1304, the student screen is displayed on the student terminal 201.

[0066] FIG. 14 shows an example of a student screen 1401. The student screen 1401 has a score display area 14011. The score calculated based on the yearly evaluation criteria is displayed in the score display area 14011. In addition, a period-specific evaluation S generated based on the period-specific evaluation criteria is displayed next to the score. For example, for "grip strength," it is displayed that the score is "10" and the period-specific evaluation is "S." In this way, by displaying the score based on the yearly evaluation criteria and the period-specific evaluation based on the period-specific evaluation criteria in a comparable manner, students can understand how their own measured values, in addition to their yearly evaluation, compare with those of students born around the same time. This can increase a student's motivation, for example, if their score is low but their period-specific evaluation is high.

[0067] Additionally, for example, in the area where "Score" is displayed in the score display area, the monthly classification used to generate the period-based evaluation, such as "Score (monthly evaluation)" or "Score (quarterly evaluation)," may also be displayed. This allows students to understand their own period-based evaluation in more detail. Note that the method of displaying the period-based evaluation does not have to be alphabetical, but may be displayed by the number of symbols such as "☆," for example, with the number of symbols increasing as the evaluation increases.

[0068] 15 and 16, the viewing of evaluations on the teacher terminal 301 will be described. In step S1501, the teacher terminal 301 logs in to the evaluation information generation device 101 and transmits a request for a teacher screen to the evaluation information generation device 101. In step S1502, the screen information generation unit 1018 generates teacher screen information for displaying the teacher screen on the teacher terminal 301. The teacher screen information is generated based on the evaluation information of each student, for example, by referring to the evaluation information of each student included in the class or grade taught by the teacher identified when logging in to the evaluation information generation device 101. In step S1503, the screen information generation unit 1018 transmits the teacher screen information to the teacher terminal 301. In step S1504, the teacher screen is displayed on the teacher terminal 301.

[0069] FIG. 16 shows an example of a teacher screen 1601. The teacher screen 1601 displays the measurement values ​​of students according to the selected grade, class, or gender. The teacher screen 1601 displays, for example, the student's measurement values ​​and period-specific evaluations, as shown in display area B. In the example of FIG. 16, for the event "Shuttle Run," the measurement value is displayed as "69" and the period-specific evaluation is displayed as "S." Although not shown in FIG. 16, period-specific evaluations may also be displayed for other events and measurement values. Furthermore, the teacher screen 1601 may highlight students or target events with particularly high period-specific evaluations for each event, for example, by highlighting or highlighting them with a border. This makes it easier for teachers to identify students who would receive high evaluations if evaluations were based on monthly age.

[0070] Furthermore, teachers may be able to set the period-based evaluation classification via the teacher's screen. For example, if a fifth-grade elementary school student is evaluated quarterly, information for setting the classification to monthly may be transmitted from the teacher's terminal 301 to the evaluation information generation device 101. When the evaluation information generation device 101 acquires information for changing the classification, the evaluation information generation device 101 may regenerate period-based evaluation criteria and period-based evaluation information on a monthly basis and transmit information for updating the teacher's screen to the teacher's terminal 301. This improves the convenience for teachers in understanding the students' evaluation criteria.

[0071] The above-described embodiments are intended to facilitate understanding of the present invention and are not intended to limit the present invention. The elements of the embodiments, as well as their arrangement, conditions, shape, size, etc., are not limited to those exemplified and can be modified as appropriate. [Explanation of symbols]

[0072] 10...Evaluation information generation system, 101...Evaluation information generation device, 201...Student terminal, 301...Teacher terminal, 1013...Student information acquisition unit, 1014...Measurement information acquisition unit, 1015...Reference information generation unit, 1016...Period-based evaluation information generation unit, 1017...Year-based evaluation information generation unit, 1018...Screen information generation unit

Claims

1. On the computer, obtaining student information including information indicating birth dates of a plurality of students; acquiring measurement information that is a result of physical fitness tests of the plurality of students; Generate period-specific reference information that serves as an evaluation standard for the measurement information for each of the predetermined periods, which are obtained by dividing the ages of the students in the school year to which the plurality of students belong into sections each including one or more months, based on period-specific measurement information obtained by aggregating the measurement information; and generating period-based evaluation information in which the results of the physical fitness tests for each of the plurality of students are evaluated according to the student's age in months, based on the period-based standard information, the measurement information, and information indicating the birth month of each of the plurality of students.

2. 2. The program according to claim 1, The computer, The program further executes the following: making the information of the plurality of students and the period-based evaluation information for each of the plurality of students viewable through a teacher terminal; and generating screen information for a teacher screen in which information of students with high evaluations for the period is highlighted based on the period-based evaluation information.

3. 2. The program according to claim 1, The program further causes the computer to generate screen information for a student screen that enables information about a target student among the plurality of students and the period-specific evaluation information of the target student to be viewed through the student terminal of the target student.

4. 2. The program according to claim 1, The computer, generating annual evaluation information for the results of the physical fitness test based on annual reference information for annual evaluation of the measurement information; The program further executes generating screen information for a comparison screen that allows the period-specific evaluation information and the year-specific evaluation information of each of the plurality of students to be compared and viewed.

5. 2. The program according to claim 1, A program in which the specified period is divided according to the grade to which the plurality of students belong.

6. 2. The program according to claim 1, the measurement information includes results of the physical fitness test by event, The period-specific reference information is generated for each of the events, The period-based evaluation information is generated for each of the items based on the period-based standard information for each of the items.

7. The computer obtaining student information including information indicating birth dates of a plurality of students; acquiring measurement information that is a result of physical fitness tests of the plurality of students; Generate period-specific reference information that serves as an evaluation standard for the measurement information for each of the predetermined periods, which are obtained by dividing the ages of the students in the school year to which the plurality of students belong into sections each including one or more months, based on period-specific measurement information obtained by aggregating the measurement information; generating period-specific evaluation information in which the results of the physical fitness tests for each of the plurality of students are evaluated according to the student's age in months, based on the period-specific standard information, the measurement information, and information indicating the birth month of each of the plurality of students.

8. a student information acquisition unit that acquires student information including information indicating the birth dates of a plurality of students; a measurement information acquisition unit that acquires measurement information that is a result of physical fitness tests of the plurality of students; a reference information generating unit that generates period-specific reference information that serves as an evaluation standard for the measurement information for each of the predetermined periods, based on period-specific measurement information obtained by aggregating the measurement information for each of the predetermined periods, in which the ages of the students in the school year to which the plurality of students belong are divided into sections each including one or more months; an information processing device comprising: a period-based evaluation information generation unit that generates period-based evaluation information in which the results of the physical fitness test for each of the plurality of students are evaluated according to the student's age in months based on the period-based standard information, the measurement information, and information indicating the birth month of each of the plurality of students.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Juvenile physical and mental quality evaluation and exercise scheme recommendation system and method

    CN107993719A

  • Baby and infant motor development assessment scale

    CN111657959A

  • Method, a device and a system for automatically generating dimension chart of preschool child, and medium

    CN113920218A

  • Childcare support system

    JP2007004302A

  • Play information providing system and play information providing method derived from school physical fitness measurement result or athletic ability check result

    JP2023084163A