Slurry Supply Equipment
The slurry supplying device addresses the challenge of separating radioactive materials from soil by generating cavitation to separate and crush mineral particles, achieving high decontamination and volume reduction rates with reduced liquid usage.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- JP · JP
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-08-29
- Publication Date
- 2026-03-12
AI Technical Summary
Existing classification processing technologies struggle to effectively reduce the concentration of radioactive materials in soil, particularly in coarse particles, due to the adsorption of radioactive substances like cesium to layered clay minerals, which are difficult to separate and remove, and the challenge of reducing the slurry-solid-liquid ratio in soil processing.
A slurry supplying device with a hopper design that mixes soil and liquid on the inner wall, utilizing a flow velocity difference to generate cavitation, separating and crushing mineral particles with radioactive materials, thereby reducing the slurry-solid-liquid ratio and enhancing the decontamination and volume reduction rates.
The device efficiently separates and crushes mineral particles with radioactive materials, achieving a decontamination rate of 80% or more and significantly reducing the volume of soil with high radioactivity concentrations, while minimizing the amount of liquid used and simplifying subsequent processing steps.
Smart Images

Figure 2026044087000001_ABST
Abstract
Description
[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention relates to a slurry supplying device that supplies a slurry containing soil and a liquid. [Background technology]
[0002] Classification processing technology is known as one of the volume reduction technologies for removing radioactive materials from soil containing radioactive materials and reducing the volume of soil with high radioactive concentrations.
[0003] In classification processing technology, soil containing radioactive materials is classified into small soil particles, such as clay and silt (hereinafter referred to as "fine particles"), and larger soil particles, such as gravel and sand (hereinafter referred to as "coarse particles"). Radioactive materials such as radioactive cesium tend to adhere to relatively small particles (for example, particles of minerals such as mica), and are therefore found in large amounts in the fine particles after classification. Therefore, by separating and removing the fine particles from the soil, the concentration of radioactive materials can be reduced. The coarse particles remaining after the fine particles have been removed can be reused for construction purposes, etc.
[0004] Patent Document 1 proposes washing the coarse particles after the above classification in order to further remove radioactive materials contained in the coarse particles. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]
[0005] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2013-140021 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]
[0006] In classification processing technology, classification and other processes are performed on a slurry prepared by mixing soil with a liquid such as water. In addition to classification, soil may be first slurried and then subjected to various processes. In such soil processing, it is sometimes necessary to reduce the weight ratio of liquid to soil in the slurry (hereinafter referred to as the "solid-liquid ratio" or "slurry-solid-liquid ratio"). For example, Patent Document 1 discloses slurriing soil in a washer, but this method leaves room for improvement in terms of reducing the slurry-solid-liquid ratio.
[0007] SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to solve the above problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a slurry supplying device that can reduce the solid-liquid ratio of a slurry in which soil is mixed with a liquid. [Means for solving the problem]
[0008] In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, a slurry supplying device according to one embodiment of the present invention is a slurry supplying device that supplies a slurry in which soil is mixed with a liquid, and includes a hopper having a tapered shape in which the inner diameter decreases from the upper opening to the lower opening, a soil supplying unit that supplies the soil from the upper opening toward the inner wall of the hopper, and a liquid supplying unit that supplies the liquid from the upper opening toward the inner wall, and the soil supplying unit and the liquid supplying unit are configured so that the liquid and the soil are mixed on the inner wall to form the slurry, which then flows out from the lower opening. [Effects of the Invention]
[0009] According to the slurry supplying device of the present invention, it is possible to further reduce the solid-liquid ratio of the slurry in which soil is mixed with liquid. [Brief explanation of the drawings]
[0010] [Figure 1] 1 is a schematic side view of a soil treatment apparatus according to a first embodiment. [Figure 2A] FIG. 2 is a schematic enlarged cross-sectional view of an area A shown in FIG. [Figure 2B]FIG. 2B is a schematic cross-sectional view taken along line IIB-IIB in FIG. 2A. [Figure 3A] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a soil treatment method I according to a first embodiment. [Figure 3B] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating another soil treatment method II according to the first embodiment. [Figure 4] FIG. 4 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing a soil treatment apparatus according to a second embodiment. [Figure 5A] FIG. 2 is a schematic enlarged cross-sectional view showing a part of a flow path of a processing section. [Figure 5B] FIG. 5B is a schematic enlarged cross-sectional view taken along line VB-VB shown in FIG. 5A. [Figure 5C] FIG. 5B is a schematic enlarged cross-sectional view taken along the line VC-VC shown in FIG. 5A. [Figure 6] FIG. 1 is a schematic top view of a fringe used in an experiment. [Figure 7A] FIG. 2 is a schematic top perspective view showing the positional relationship between the conveying device and the hopper. [Figure 7B] FIG. 7B is a schematic cross-sectional view taken along line VIIB-VIIB shown in FIG. 7A. [Figure 8A] FIG. 10 is a schematic perspective view showing a modified example of the liquid supply unit and the hopper. [Figure 8B] FIG. 8B is a top view of the liquid supply and hopper shown in FIG. 8A. [Figure 9] FIG. 10 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing a modified example of a flow channel. [Figure 10] FIG. 10 is a schematic side view showing an apparatus of a comparative example. [Figure 11A] 1 is a photograph showing a measurement sample after crushing treatment in an example. [Figure 11B] 10 is a photograph showing a measurement sample of a comparative example. [Figure 11C] FIG. 2 is a graph showing particle size accumulation curves of measurement samples of Examples and Comparative Examples. [Figure 12] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a soil treatment method according to a reference example. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0011] (Findings that form the basis of the present invention) The present inventors have conducted extensive research into ways to make it easier to remove radioactive materials from soil, and have come to the following findings.
[0012] Conventional classification processing techniques have the following problems (1) and (2).
[0013] (1) It is known that radioactive substances such as radioactive cesium are easily adsorbed to particles of layered clay minerals. Examples of layered clay minerals include mica minerals (hereinafter simply referred to as "mica"), such as weathered biotite and its weathered product, vermiculite. Mineral particles such as mica can adhere to or be encapsulated in large sand particles or gravel particles. When mineral particles adhere to (or are encapsulated in) sand particles, even after classification, the mineral particles with adsorbed radioactive substances will be included in the coarse fraction after classification. Furthermore, when the mineral particles with adsorbed radioactive substances are large, they will be separated into the coarse fraction. This makes it difficult to reliably remove radioactive substances through classification. In response to this, it has been proposed to reduce the radioactive concentration by performing advanced classification and washing processes on the coarse fraction after classification (e.g., Patent Document 1). However, the method described in Patent Document 1 is considered to be difficult to reliably remove mineral particles that are attached to or encapsulated in sand particles. Details will be provided below.
[0014] Furthermore, recent research has shown that radioactive materials such as radioactive cesium are adsorbed to layered clay mineral particles and then trapped (immobilized) within them. The interlayer surfaces of layered clay mineral particles are negatively charged, making it easy for radioactive materials to adsorb to these surfaces. When radioactive materials are adsorbed between the two layers that make up a layered clay mineral particle, the two layers sandwiching the radioactive material close over time. In this way, the radioactive materials are trapped within the layered clay mineral particle. When radioactive materials are immobilized within layered clay mineral particles, they are less likely to detach or elute from the particle. In particular, when radioactive materials are trapped in areas of large mica particles that have been altered by weathering, it becomes even more difficult to remove them using conventional classification techniques.
[0015] Therefore, it may be difficult to reduce the concentration of radioactive materials in the coarse particles and increase the decontamination rate.
[0016] (2) Furthermore, to more reliably remove radioactive materials from soil by classification, it is necessary to separate and remove soil particles in a particle size range that includes mineral particles, which are considered to be fine particles with high concentrations of radioactive materials. As mentioned above, if radioactive materials are trapped in mineral particles and are difficult to dissolve or desorb, it can be difficult to reduce the fine particles and increase the volume reduction rate. "Volume reduction" refers to reducing the volume of soil whose radioactivity concentration is higher than a specified value (e.g., 8000 Bq / kg) and cannot be reused as is.
[0017] Therefore, after extensive research, the inventors of the present application discovered a method for generating cavitation by injecting a pressurized liquid into a slurry containing soil and creating a flow velocity difference at the interface between the pressurized liquid and the slurry. With this method, mineral particles with radioactive material adsorbed thereon can be separated from other particles by the impact force generated when bubbles generated by cavitation collapse. This makes it easier to remove the radioactive material from the soil. "Mineral particles with radioactive material adsorbed thereon" includes not only particles with radioactive material adsorbed on their surfaces, but also particles with radioactive material adsorbed between layers (trapped between layers).
[0018] According to the above method, the impact force generated when the bubbles collapse can separate mineral particles attached to large soil particles, such as sand particles, from the soil particles. Alternatively, the impact force generated when the bubbles collapse can crush mineral particles to which radioactive materials are adsorbed into smaller particles. As a result, the concentration of radioactive materials in the coarse particles after classification can be reduced. Furthermore, by reducing the particle size of particles to which radioactive materials are attached, the volume of soil (fine particles) with a high concentration of radioactive materials can be reduced.
[0019] After further investigation, the inventors found that, in the above method, by reducing the weight ratio of liquid to soil in the slurry (slurry solid-liquid ratio), the impact force generated when the bubbles collapse is transmitted more efficiently to the mineral particles in the slurry. The inventors then discovered a slurry supply device configured to mix soil and liquid on the inner wall of a hopper to form a slurry, which then flows out from the bottom of the hopper. This configuration makes it possible to more reliably mix the liquid and soil even when the amount of liquid relative to the soil is reduced. Based on this novel finding, the inventors arrived at the present invention.
[0020] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to these embodiments. For illustrative purposes, the dimensions of each element in the drawings may be exaggerated and are not necessarily drawn to scale. Furthermore, substantially identical elements in the drawings are designated by the same reference numerals.
[0021] For convenience of explanation, terms indicating directions such as "up," "down," "side," "left," and "right" are used below assuming a state during normal use, but are not intended to limit the state of use of the device according to the present invention. For reference, the drawings schematically show an X-axis, a Y-axis, and a Z-axis that are perpendicular to each other. The Z-axis is, for example, the vertical direction. In the following explanation, when simply referring to the X direction, the Y direction, or the Z direction, it refers to the respective axial direction and includes two opposite directions (for example, the -X direction and the +X direction).
[0022] First Embodiment A soil treatment apparatus and a soil treatment method according to a first embodiment will be described.
[0023] [Soil treatment device] 1, 2A, and 2B are schematic diagrams illustrating the general structure and principle of a soil treatment device according to a first embodiment. Fig. 1 is a schematic side view of the soil treatment device. Fig. 2A is a schematic enlarged cross-sectional view of region A shown in Fig. 1, and Fig. 2B is a schematic cross-sectional view taken along line IIB-IIB in Fig. 2A.
[0024] The soil treatment device 1 is a device for treating soil containing mineral particles to which radioactive materials are adsorbed. In this embodiment, the soil to be treated contains mineral particles to which radioactive materials are adsorbed and soil particles with a particle size larger than that of the mineral particles. The soil to be treated by the soil treatment device 1 may be soil that has not been subjected to classification treatment, and may be soil with a wide particle size distribution including, for example, gravel particles (particle size: for example, 2 mm or more), sand particles (particle size: for example, 74 μm or more and less than 2 mm), silt particles (particle size: for example, 5 μm or more and less than 74 μm), and clay particles (particle size: for example, less than 5 μm).
[0025] As shown in FIG. 1, the soil treatment device 1 includes a treatment section 3, an ejection section 2 that ejects pressurized liquid 20 into the treatment section 3, and a slurry supply section 4 that supplies a slurry 40 containing soil to the treatment section 3.
[0026] The processing unit 3 includes a flow path 30. The flow path 30 is configured, for example, by a pipe having a circular cross section. The flow path 30 extends, for example, in a horizontal direction perpendicular to the vertical direction. For ease of understanding, in FIG. 1 , the vertically upward direction is shown as the +Z direction, and the direction from the upstream side to the downstream side of the flow path 30 is shown as the +X direction. The flow path 30 may include an outlet 37 at its downstream end, which discharges a mixture 70 containing the treated slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 from the processing unit 3.
[0027] The ejection unit 2 is disposed so as to eject the pressurized liquid 20 in a direction (+X direction) from the upstream side to the downstream side of the flow path 30. The ejection unit 2 ejects the pressurized liquid 20 toward the slurry 40 in the flow path 30. The ejection unit 2 is, for example, a high-pressure ejector that ejects high-pressure water.
[0028] The slurry supply unit 4 supplies a slurry 40, which is obtained by mixing soil with a liquid (e.g., water), to the flow path 30. The slurry supply unit 4 is connected to the flow path 30 downstream of the ejection unit 2. In the flow path 30, the slurry supply unit 4 supplies the slurry 40 toward the pressurized liquid 20 ejected by the ejection unit 2 in a direction intersecting the ejection direction of the pressurized liquid 20. In the example shown in FIG. 1, the slurry supply unit 4 is configured to supply the slurry 40 in a direction (-Z direction) perpendicular to the ejection direction. The pressure of the liquid contained in the slurry 40 when supplied is, for example, approximately 1 atmosphere.
[0029] 2A and 2B, the ejection unit 2 and the slurry supply unit 4 are configured to generate cavitation by creating a flow velocity difference at the interface 20s between the pressurized liquid 20 and the slurry 40. The mechanism by which cavitation is generated will be described below.
[0030] As shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, the pressurized liquid 20 ejected from the ejection unit 2 is a high-speed fluid (e.g., pressure: 4 MPa, speed: approximately 50 m / s) that moves at high speed in the +X direction within the flow path 30. Within the flow path 30, the pressurized liquid 20 collides with the slurry 40 and, as shown in FIG. 2B, moves at high speed through approximately the center of the slurry 40. The slurry 40 is pulled by the flow of the pressurized liquid 20, forming a multiphase flow around the pressurized liquid 20 and flowing in the same direction as the pressurized liquid 20. The multiphase flow here refers to a flow that includes at least the soil (solid phase) and liquid (liquid phase) contained in the slurry 40. A space 80 may exist above the slurry 40. Because the slurry 40 flows at a slower speed than the pressurized liquid 20, a flow velocity difference occurs at the interface 20s between the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20. This results in cavitation. Specifically, as shown in Fig. 2A, a shear force caused by the difference in flow speed between the pressurized liquid 20 and the slurry 40 generates a vortex 82 in the slurry 40. The center of the vortex 82 is locally under low pressure, causing the liquid in the slurry 40 to evaporate and generate bubbles 81. The slurry 40 flows downstream, entraining the bubbles 81. As the slurry 40 flows downstream, the bubbles 81 are compressed by the surrounding liquid and collapse.
[0031] When the bubbles 81 generated by cavitation collapse, a large impact force is generated. This impact force separates the mineral particles contained in the slurry 40 from other particles. In this specification, "separating mineral particles from other particles" not only refers to separating mineral particles attached to or contained within soil particles, such as sand particles, from the soil particles (hereinafter referred to as "disintegration"), but also includes breaking up the mineral particles and dividing them into multiple smaller particles (hereinafter referred to as "crushing"). In this embodiment, the impact force generated when the bubbles 81 collapse causes disintegration, crushing, or both of the mineral particles.
[0032] Bubbles 81 caused by cavitation are generated one after another in the slurry 40 while the slurry 40 flows in contact with the pressurized liquid 20, and then collapse. Therefore, impact forces caused by the collapse of the bubbles 81 can be applied to the particles in the slurry 40 throughout the time the slurry 40 flows.
[0033] As shown in FIG. 1, in the flow path 30, the region Rc configured to generate cavitation by the above mechanism is referred to as the "cavitation generation region." The cavitation generation region Rc is located downstream of the position P where the slurry 40 is supplied from the slurry supply unit 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "slurry supply position"). In the cavitation generation region Rc, the slurry 40 flows around the pressurized liquid 20, as shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. The decomposition of mineral particles in the slurry 40 mainly occurs in the cavitation generation region Rc. Downstream of the cavitation generation region Rc, the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 are mixed to form a mixture 70. The mixture 70 is discharged from the outlet 37 and sent to, for example, a classifier.
[0034] In the example shown in FIG. 1, no air inlet for introducing air from the outside is provided upstream of the slurry supply position P in the flow path 30. In this embodiment, the bubbles generated by cavitation are vaporized liquid in the slurry 40. Since cavitation is not caused by air introduced from the outside, it is not necessary to provide an air inlet in the flow path 30. Note that an air inlet may be provided in the flow path 30 as long as it does not hinder the generation of cavitation due to a difference in flow velocity.
[0035] In this embodiment, the cavitation generated by the above mechanism is utilized, so that the separation of mineral particles (for example, sludge dissolution and crushing) can be performed more efficiently and more reliably.
[0036] Patent Document 1 describes washing sediment using cavitation generated by a method different from that of the present invention. In Patent Document 1, pressurized fluid is ejected from a jetting portion to generate bubbles, and the sediment is supplied to an area near the jetting portion where the bubbles exist. However, the inventors of the present invention have found that with this configuration, it is difficult to reliably supply sediment to the limited area where the bubbles exist. Furthermore, the sediment can only receive impact force in a limited area near the jetting portion (the area where the bubbles exist). For this reason, it is difficult to efficiently apply impact force to the sediment sufficient to sufficiently separate radioactive materials from the sediment or to crush mineral particles.
[0037] In contrast, in this embodiment, cavitation is generated at the interface 20s between the flow of the soil-containing slurry 40 and the flow of the pressurized liquid 20, so that bubbles can be generated not only in the area near the outlet of the pressurized liquid 20 but also along the length of the flow path 30. Furthermore, because the slurry 40 entrains bubbles as it flows, the impact force caused by the collapse of the bubbles can be more reliably applied to the slurry 40. Furthermore, because the generation and collapse of bubbles are repeated while the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 are in contact with each other and flowing, high impact forces are repeatedly applied to the particles in the slurry 40. Therefore, separation of mineral particles can be further promoted downstream of the flow path 30.
[0038] Furthermore, in the device of Patent Document 1, the area where the bubbles exist is limited, and particles with relatively small diameters may not be easily affected by the cavitation effect. In contrast, in the soil treatment device 1 of this embodiment, the slurry 40 moves along, entraining the bubbles, so the cavitation effect is more likely to extend to the small particles contained in the slurry 40. Furthermore, in the soil treatment device 1 of this embodiment, by reducing the amount of liquid relative to the soil in the slurry 40, the impact force of the bubbles 81 when they collapse can be more efficiently applied to the mineral particles.
[0039] [Soil treatment method] The soil treatment method of this embodiment includes a step of generating cavitation by the mechanism described above with reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B (hereinafter referred to as the "cavitation generating step"). In the cavitation generating step, pressurized liquid is ejected toward a slurry in which soil is mixed with liquid, and a flow velocity difference is generated at the interface between the pressurized liquid and the slurry, thereby generating cavitation (see FIGS. 2A and 2B). The cavitation generating step can be performed using, for example, the soil treatment device 1 shown in FIG. 1. Note that the device used in this step is not limited to the device shown in FIG. 1, as long as it is configured to generate cavitation by utilizing the flow velocity difference between the slurry and the pressurized liquid.
[0040] 3A and 3B are schematic diagrams illustrating soil treatment methods I and II according to the first embodiment, respectively. As a reference example, a treatment method in which only classification treatment is performed is schematically shown in FIG.
[0041] 3A, 3B, and FIG. 12 of the Reference Example illustrate an example in which soil 10, which is the material to be treated, includes gravel particles (particle size: e.g., 2 mm or more) 11, sand particles (particle size: e.g., 74 μm or more and less than 2 mm) 12, and silt or clay particles (silt particle size: e.g., 5 μm or more and less than 74 μm, clay particle size: e.g., less than 5 μm) 13. These particles include mineral particles 15 to which radioactive materials such as radioactive cesium are adsorbed (hereinafter referred to as "radioactive material-containing mineral particles"). The particle size of the radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 is not particularly limited. Examples of radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 in various particle sizes, ranging from relatively small to 2 mm or more, are illustrated here. Some of the radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 may be attached to or encapsulated in larger soil particles (e.g., gravel particles 11, sand particles 12, etc.).
[0042] For ease of understanding, the method of the reference example shown in FIG. 12 will be described first. In this reference example, the above-mentioned soil 10 is classified into a coarse fraction having a particle size of, for example, 75 μm or more and a fine fraction having a particle size of less than 75 μm. As a result, radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 having a particle size of 75 μm or more are classified as the coarse fraction. On the other hand, radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 having a particle size of less than 75 μm can be classified as the fine fraction. However, as shown in the figure, some of the radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 having a particle size of less than 75 μm may be classified as the coarse fraction together with sand particles 12 and gravel particles 11, etc., in a state where they are attached to or encapsulated within these particles. As a result, it is difficult to sufficiently reduce the concentration of radioactive material in the coarse fraction after classification.
[0043] In contrast, in the soil treatment methods I and II of the present embodiment, a cavitation generation step is performed before classification, which allows the amount of radioactive material contained in the coarse fraction after classification to be reduced compared to the method of the reference example shown in Figure 12.
[0044] <Soil treatment method I> As shown in Figure 3A, in the soil treatment method I, in the cavitation generation step, the impact force generated when the bubbles collapse separates the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 from other particles. As a result, the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 that have been attached to soil particles such as sand particles 12 and gravel particles 11 are separated from the soil particles (disintegration). Furthermore, the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 and other mineral particles are crushed into smaller particles 14 (crushing). After crushing the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15, the radioactive substance may be adsorbed on the particles 14 or may be desorbed from the particles 14.
[0045] In the cavitation generation process, as shown in the figure, it is sufficient that at least the portions of the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 to which the radioactive substance is adsorbed are crushed. For example, if the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 are mica, the radioactive substance is mainly adsorbed or fixed to the portions of the mica particles that have been altered by weathering (weathered portions), so it is sufficient that at least the weathered portions are crushed. The weathered portions are located, for example, near the surfaces of the mica particles. The unweathered portions are harder than the weathered portions and are therefore less likely to be crushed, and can be discharged from the flow path while maintaining a certain size. Similarly, soil particles, which are harder than the weathered portions of mica, are also less likely to be crushed, so they are not crushed as small as the weathered portions and can be discharged from the flow path while maintaining a certain size.
[0046] After the cavitation generation step, the mixture of the treated slurry and the pressurized liquid is classified into a large particle group and a small particle group having a particle size smaller than that of the large particle group. In this processing method, the large particle group has a particle size, for example, equal to or larger than that of radioactive substance-containing mineral particles. The small particle group has a particle size, for example, smaller than that of radioactive substance-containing mineral particles. The small particle group includes particles 14 obtained after radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 are crushed. The radioactive substance is included in the small particle group because it is adsorbed to or desorbed from the particles 14. Classification may be performed based on the particle size of relatively small radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 (for example, the particle size of silt or clay), thereby making it possible to further reduce the particle size at the classification point. The particle size at the classification point may be less than 75 μm, for example, 20 μm or less.
[0047] According to soil treatment method I, radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 are separated from larger soil particles by the cavitation generation process. Furthermore, the larger radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 are crushed into smaller particles 14. Therefore, subsequent classification can more reliably separate the radioactive material into smaller particle groups. Therefore, the radioactive material concentration in the larger particle group can be further reduced (i.e., the decontamination rate can be increased) than in the reference method (Figure 12). For example, soil with a radioactivity concentration of over 8000 Bq can be reduced to a concentration significantly below the reusable limit of 8000 Bq / kg (e.g., 1000 Bq / kg or less). Furthermore, since advanced classification, cleaning, and other processes are not required after this treatment, the equipment, costs, number of processes, and amount of water used for soil treatment can be reduced.
[0048] Furthermore, according to soil treatment method I, the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 are crushed by the cavitation generation process, so that in the subsequent classification process, the particle size at the classification point can be made smaller, thereby making it possible to reduce the volume of soil with a high concentration of radioactive substances (small particle group) (i.e., increasing the volume reduction rate).
[0049] <Soil Treatment Method II> In the soil treatment method II, at least the thawing process is carried out by the cavitation generation step. As shown in Figure 3B, in the cavitation generation step, the impact force generated when the bubbles collapse separates radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 that have been attached to (or contained within) soil particles such as sand particles 12 and gravel particles 11 from the soil particles (thawing).
[0050] Next, as in soil treatment method I, a classification step is performed in which the mixture of the slurry and pressurized liquid is classified into a large particle group and a small particle group. The large particle group is, for example, a particle group including soil particles (sand particles 12 or gravel particles 11 in this example) to which radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 were attached before thawing. The small particle group is, for example, a particle group including radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15. The small particle group includes radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 separated from the soil particles. The particle size at the classification point is, for example, 75 μm.
[0051] According to the soil treatment method II, the radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 are separated from the larger soil particles by the cavitation generation process, and the radioactive material can be more reliably separated into small particle groups by the subsequent classification. Therefore, the concentration of radioactive material in the large particle group can be further reduced (i.e., the decontamination rate can be increased) than in the method of the reference example (Figure 12).
[0052] (effect) As shown in Figures 1 to 2B, the soil treatment device 1 of this embodiment is configured such that the outlet unit 2 and the slurry supply unit 4 generate a flow velocity difference at the interface 20s between the pressurized liquid 20 and the slurry 40 in the flow path 30 of the treatment unit 3, thereby generating cavitation. With this configuration, the impact force generated when bubbles collapse due to cavitation can be used to separate mineral particles from other particles, such as sludge disintegration and crushing. As a result, radioactive materials can be easily removed.
[0053] 2A and 2B, the above configuration allows the impact force caused by the collapse of bubbles to be applied to mineral particles more efficiently than in conventional devices (such as the device described in Patent Document 1). Therefore, the mineral particles can be separated from other particles more reliably.
[0054] Furthermore, with the above configuration, the decomposition of mineral particles can be promoted while the soil-containing slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 are flowing in the same direction, which allows for continuous treatment and allows for a large amount of soil to be treated per hour (for example, 12 tons / hour or more).
[0055] The emission section 2 and the slurry supply section 4 may be configured to perform a sludge treatment in which radioactive material-containing mineral particles 15 attached to (or encapsulated within) soil particles such as sand particles 12 are separated from the soil particles by the impact force generated when bubbles generated by cavitation collapse, as shown in Fig. 3B. With this configuration, the amount of radioactive material contained in the large particle group after classification can be reduced in the subsequent classification treatment.
[0056] The discharge section 2 and the slurry supply section 4 may be configured to perform a crushing process in which radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 are crushed into particles 14 having a particle size smaller than that of the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15 by the impact force generated when bubbles generated by cavitation collapse, as shown in FIG. 3A. The soil treatment device 1 can repeatedly apply a strong impact force to mineral particles, thereby having a high crushing ability. With this configuration, the radioactive substance contained in the large particle group after classification can be further reduced in the subsequent classification process. Furthermore, radioactive substance can be removed even if the particle size at the classification point is reduced (for example, less than the particle size of the radioactive substance-containing mineral particles 15). Therefore, the volume of the small particle group having a high concentration of radioactive substance can be reduced.
[0057] The discharge unit 2 and the slurry supply unit 4 may be configured to separate the radioactive material-containing mineral particles from the soil particles by the impact force generated when the bubbles generated by cavitation collapse, and then crush the separated radioactive material-containing mineral particles. With this configuration, the sludge deflocculation process and the crushing process can be carried out simultaneously while the slurry 40 flows in contact with the pressurized liquid 20. Therefore, there is no need to prepare separate devices for sludge deflocculation and crushing, which further reduces the cost, number of steps, time, etc. required for the process.
[0058] This embodiment provides a soil treatment method including a cavitation generation step. In the cavitation generation step, pressurized liquid is injected into a slurry containing soil and liquid, creating a flow velocity difference at the interface between the pressurized liquid and the slurry, thereby generating cavitation. As shown in Figures 3A and 3B, the impact force generated when bubbles generated by cavitation collapse separates mineral particles 15 with radioactive material adsorbed from other particles. For example, the impact force causes sludge disintegration, crushing, or both. This facilitates the removal of radioactive material, thereby enabling a higher decontamination rate and / or volume reduction rate.
[0059] The radioactive material adsorbed to the mineral particles may be, for example, radioactive cesium, and the mineral particles to which the radioactive cesium is adsorbed may be, for example, mica particles. It has been reported that most of the radioactive cesium is adsorbed or fixed to mica. Therefore, by crushing and dissolving the mica particles to which the radioactive cesium is adsorbed, the radioactive cesium can be more effectively removed from the soil. For example, it is possible to increase the decontamination rate from about 70% in conventional classification processes to 80% or more, preferably about 90%.
[0060] In the soil treatment method of this embodiment, the ratio of the weight of the liquid used to the weight of the soil to be treated (hereinafter referred to as the "total solid-liquid ratio") is, for example, 5 or more and 15 or less, preferably 10 or less. The "weight of soil" refers to the dry weight of the soil. The "weight of liquid used" refers to the total weight of the liquid used in the treatment, and includes the weight of the liquid contained in the slurry 40 (Figure 1) and the weight of the pressurized liquid 20 (Figure 1). By keeping the total solid-liquid ratio at 15 or less, the costs associated with soil treatment and the disposal of the liquid used can be reduced, and practicality can be improved.
[0061] The weight ratio of pressurized liquid 20 (FIG. 1) to soil is 10 or less, preferably 6 or less. The weight ratio of liquid contained in slurry 40 to soil (slurry solid-liquid ratio) is 5 or less, preferably 3 or less. By keeping the amount of liquid contained in slurry 40 small, the impact force caused by bubble collapse is more easily applied to the particles in slurry 40, allowing for efficient separation of mineral particles.
[0062] In conventional treatment methods, for example, after normal classification using a trommel or the like, advanced classification is sometimes performed in which coarse particles are subjected to mechanical impact force. This method requires a large amount of liquid, resulting in a total solid-liquid ratio exceeding 20, for example. Because the liquid (water) used for treatment contains radioactive materials, its storage and disposal are additionally costly. In contrast, in this embodiment, before classification, a cavitation generation process is performed on the entire soil for thawing and crushing. In the subsequent classification process, the soil after thawing is classified, eliminating the need for advanced classification as in the past. Therefore, the total solid-liquid ratio can be reduced compared to conventional methods.
[0063] 3A and 3B illustrate a method for treating soil 10 containing clay, silt, sand, and gravel, but the soil treatment method of this embodiment can also be applied to treating only coarse particles (sand, gravel, etc.) or only fine particles (clay, silt) after a normal classification process. The soil treatment method of this embodiment can also be applied to soil that has previously been subjected to a sludge treatment to break down mineral particles.
[0064] The cavitation generation process shown in Figures 3A and 3B shows that mineral particles are thawed and crushed. However, the impact force caused by the collapse of the bubbles can not only thaw mineral particles, but also loosen clumps of clay and other lumps in the slurry. Particles other than mineral particles can also be crushed, and large particles such as gravel can be rounded and polished. Changes in mineral particles and other particles can be confirmed, for example, by observing the soil before and after the cavitation generation process and comparing the particle size distribution.
[0065] Second Embodiment 4 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing a soil treatment device according to a second embodiment of the present invention. Below, differences from the soil treatment device of the first embodiment will be mainly described, and overlapping descriptions will be omitted as appropriate.
[0066] The soil treatment apparatus 1a shown in Figure 4 comprises a treatment section 3 having a flow path 30, an outlet section 2 that outlets pressurized liquid 20, a slurry supply section (sometimes referred to as a "slurry supply device") 4 that supplies slurry 40, a classification section 7, and a control section 8. The slurry supply section 4 comprises a liquid supply section 5, a soil supply section 6, and a mixing section. The mixing section is configured to mix the liquid 50 supplied from the liquid supply section 5 with the soil 10 supplied from the soil supply section 6. In this example, a hopper 41 functions as the mixing section.
[0067] In the soil treatment apparatus 1a, soil 10, which is the material to be treated, is supplied to a hopper 41 by a soil supply unit 6. Liquid (here, water) 50, to be mixed with the soil 10, is supplied to the hopper 41 by a liquid supply unit 5. The soil 10 and liquid 50, separately supplied to the hopper 41, are mixed on the inner wall of the hopper 41 to form a slurry 40, which is then supplied to a flow path 30 of a treatment unit 3. In the flow path 30 of the treatment unit 3, a pressurized liquid 20 is ejected from an ejection unit 2 onto the slurry 40. As in the previous embodiment, a process is performed in the flow path 30 to separate mineral particles in the slurry 40 from other particles using cavitation. The processed slurry 40 and pressurized liquid 20 are discharged from an outlet 37 of the flow path 30 and sent to a classification unit 7.
[0068] The specific configuration of each component of the soil treatment device 1a will be described below. In the following description, examples of the treatment conditions, size, capacity, etc. of each component when treating soil 10 at 1 kg / min may be given. Note that the treatment conditions, size, capacity, etc. of each component may be selected appropriately depending on the type of soil, the amount of soil to be treated, etc., and are not limited to the values given as examples.
[0069] (Exit part) The ejection unit 2 includes a high-pressure ejector equipped with a nozzle 22 having an ejection port at its tip, a triple-plunger type high-speed jet pump (capacity: e.g., 6.3 L / m x 5.5 MPa x 0.83 kW x 100 V) 23, and a pipe 24 located upstream of the nozzle 22 and fluidly connecting the high-speed jet pump 23 and the nozzle 22. The nozzle 22 is configured so that its cross-sectional area increases from the ejection port toward the pipe 24.
[0070] The high-pressure ejector is set, for example, to move at high speed along the portion of the flow path 30 extending in the X direction. In this embodiment, the high-pressure ejector ejects pressurized liquid (here, pressurized water) 20 of 4 MPa along the X direction at a flow rate of 0.1 liters / second. The speed of the pressurized water is, for example, 50 meters per second.
[0071] (Processing section) The flow path 30 of the processing section 3 has a plurality of portions 31 to 34 with different cross-sectional areas. The cross-sectional area of the flow path 30 refers to the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the extension direction of the flow path 30. In the example shown in Fig. 4, a plurality of pipes with different diameters are connected to form the flow path 30, but these may also be formed integrally.
[0072] In this embodiment, the flow path 30 has an expansion section 36 that expands the cross-sectional area of the flow path 30. The expansion section 36 is located in the flow path 30 downstream of a slurry supply position P to which the slurry supply section 4 is connected. Downstream of the expansion section 36, the slurry 40 is at a lower pressure than upstream of the expansion section 36, and the difference in flow velocity between the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 is greater, thereby increasing the amount of bubbles generated by cavitation. Therefore, by providing the expansion section 36, the cavitation generation region Rc in the flow path 30 can be made longer.
[0073] 4, the flow path 30 includes a first portion 31, a second portion 32 located downstream (on the +X side) of the first portion 31 and having a smaller cross-sectional area than the first portion 31, and a third portion 33 located downstream of the second portion 32 and having a larger cross-sectional area than the second portion 32. A slurry supply unit 4 is connected to the first portion 31. The downstream end of the second portion 32 and the upstream end of the third portion 33 form an enlarged portion 36 that enlarges the cross-sectional area of the flow path 30.
[0074] 5A to 5C, the function of each part of the flow channel 30 will be specifically described. Fig. 5A is a schematic enlarged cross-sectional view showing a part of the flow channel 30. Figs. 5B and 5C are enlarged cross-sectional views taken along lines VB-VB and VC-VC shown in Fig. 5A, respectively.
[0075] In the illustrated example, the cross-section of the flow path 30 is, for example, circular. In this case, the diameter D1 of the first portion 31 and the diameter D3 of the third portion 33 are larger than the diameter D2 of the second portion 32 (D2 < D1, D3). From the slurry supply position P of the first portion 31 to at least a part of the third portion 33, it extends in the ejection direction (X direction) of the pressurized liquid 20. In FIG. 4, the diameters of each of the first portion 31 to the third portion 33 are substantially constant, but the diameter of each portion may be set so as to have a function as described below and does not have to be substantially constant.
[0076] In the present embodiment, the cavitation generation region Rc includes a region that extends in the X direction from the slurry supply position P of the flow path 30 to at least a part of the third portion 33. In the illustrated example, from the slurry supply position P to the position where the pressurized liquid 20 collides with the inner wall of the pipe of the third portion 33 is the cavitation generation region Rc.
[0077] <First portion> The first portion 31 includes a region where the pressurized liquid 20 from the ejection portion 2 first collides with the slurry 40 at atmospheric pressure. After the collision, the pressurized liquid 20 travels downstream through the slurry 40 (see FIG. 2B). In the first portion 31, since the flow velocity difference between the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 is large, vortices 82 are likely to be formed due to the flow velocity difference, and the amount of generated bubbles 81 is large.
[0078] The first portion 31 has a sufficient cross-sectional area so that the pressurized liquid 20 can flow downstream in the slurry 40. As shown in FIG. 5A, the first portion 31 may be configured to have a space 80 above the slurry 40 such that the slurry 40 collided by the pressurized liquid 20 can escape. In this example, the diameter (inner diameter) D1 of the first portion 31 is, for example, 27.0 mm.
[0079] The length L1 along the X direction from the slurry supply position P to the tapered portion 34 in the first part 31 may be smaller than the lengths L2 and L3 along the X direction of the second part 32 and the third part 33 respectively (L1 < L2, L3). In the first part 31, since the slurry 40 can easily escape into the upper space 80, the contact area between the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 tends to be small. By keeping the length L1 of the first part 31 smaller than that of the second part 32 and the third part 33, the contact area (the area of the interface 20s) for generating cavitation can be increased more quickly.
[0080] <Second part> As shown in FIG. 5B, the second part 32 is configured such that the slurry 40 flows so as to generally fill the periphery of the pressurized liquid 20. The space 80 above the slurry 40 becomes narrower than that in the first part 31. Since the space 80 becomes narrower, it becomes difficult for the slurry 40 to escape from the impact force at the time of the collapse of the bubble 81, and the impact force easily acts on the particles in the slurry 40. Also, the slurry 40 can be more reliably brought into contact with the peripheral surface of the pressurized liquid 20. As a result, the area of the interface 20s where the bubbles 81 are generated by cavitation can be increased. Further, since the radial thickness t of the slurry 40 is suppressed to be smaller than that of the first part 31, the impact force at the time of the collapse of the bubble 81 is likely to be transmitted to the entire thickness t of the slurry 40.
[0081] The cross-sectional area of the second part 32 may be set such that the flow of the slurry 40 is formed around the flow (jet flow) of the pressurized liquid 20. As shown in FIG. 5, the diameter D2 of the second part 32 is set to be at least larger than the diameter Dj of the pressurized liquid 20 (jet flow). On the other hand, if the diameter D2 becomes too small, the flow rate of the slurry 40 may decrease or the slurry 40 may become clogged. To suppress this, the diameter (inner diameter) D2 may be at least 1 / 2 of the diameter D1. In this example, the diameter D2 of the second part 32 is, for example, 21.6 mm.
[0082] The cross-sectional area of the second portion 32 may be set to be larger than the cross-sectional area of the pipe 24 (FIG. 4) of the emission unit 2. This makes it possible to more reliably make the cross-sectional area of the second portion 32 larger than the cross-sectional area of the pressurized liquid 20. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 5B, a flow of the slurry 40 is easily formed around the pressurized liquid 20.
[0083] When the flow rate of the slurry 40 is substantially constant, the cross-sectional area of the slurry 40 decreases in the second portion 32, and the slurry 40 accelerates. As a result, the difference in flow velocity between the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 gradually decreases, making it difficult for cavitation to occur.
[0084] By providing the second portion 32, the pressure of the slurry 40 is released in the subsequent third portion 33, thereby promoting the generation of bubbles by cavitation. The length L2 of the second portion 32 may be smaller than the length L3 of the third portion 33, for example. This allows the slurry 40 to move more quickly to the third portion 33, where the amount of bubbles generated increases.
[0085] <3rd part> In the third portion 33, the cross-sectional area of the flow path 30 expands, causing the pressure of the slurry 40 to be suddenly released, generating bubbles 81. Furthermore, the flow rate of the slurry 40 decreases, causing the difference in flow rate between the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 to increase again, making it easier for vortices 82 to form, and increasing the number of bubbles 81. In this way, the number of bubbles 81 generated increases in the third portion 33, and the impact force generated when the bubbles 81 collapse can further promote sludge dissolution and crushing of the soil in the slurry 40.
[0086] In the third section 33, since the flow rates of the pressurized liquid 20 and the slurry 40 are decreasing, they are more susceptible to the influence of the Coriolis force. As shown in FIG. 5C, in the Northern Hemisphere, the flow of the pressurized liquid 20 is bent to the right with respect to the advancing direction (+X direction) under the influence of the Coriolis force. Further, as shown in the enlarged view of FIG. 5C, among the particles in the slurry 40, the relatively heavy particles p1 are more susceptible to the influence of the Coriolis force and thus tend to gather on the right side of the advancing direction. Thus, the relatively light particles p2 in the slurry 40 can flow separately from the relatively heavy particles p1, making it easier for the impact force at the time of the collapse of the bubbles 81 to act on the light particles p1. Therefore, mineral particles such as relatively light mica can be crushed more efficiently. The mica that has been deslimed or crushed in the first section 31 and the second section 32 can be further crushed in the third section 33. Alternatively, mica that was not sufficiently crushed due to the cavitation effect being difficult to reach in the first section 31 and the second section 32 can be crushed in the third section 33.
[0087] The diameter D3 of the third section 33 may be, for example, not more than twice the diameter D2 of the second section 32 (D2 < D3 ≦ 2×D2). Thereby, clogging is less likely to occur at the downstream end of the second section 32. The diameter (inner diameter) D3 of the third section 33 is, for example, 41.6 mm.
[0088] A tapered section whose diameter increases toward the third section 33 may be provided between the second section 32 and the third section 33. In this case, the diameter D3 of the third section 33 can be made even larger.
[0089] The length L3 of the third portion 33 may be greater than the length L1 of the first portion 31 and the length L2 of the second portion 32. The length L3 may be greater than the length L4 of the flow path 30 from the slurry supply position P to the upstream end of the third portion 33. Increasing the length L3 of the third portion 33 can further promote sludge dissolution and crushing (particularly crushing) by cavitation. In particular, efficient crushing using the Coriolis force can be achieved. Furthermore, even if the soil contains relatively large mineral particles (e.g., particle size: 2 mm or more), the weathered portions of the particles can be sufficiently crushed.
[0090] In the third portion 33, a portion located downstream of the cavitation generation region Rc extends, for example, in the −Z direction and is connected to the classifying unit 7. In the example shown in FIG. 4 , the piping that constitutes the third portion 33 is a bent piping that extends in the X direction and then bends downward. Alternatively, the bent piping that constitutes the third portion 33 may be bent horizontally and extend to the classifying unit 7. Alternatively, the third portion 33 may be formed using a straight piping that extends in the X direction. In this case, a discharge port that faces vertically downward may be provided on a side surface of the third portion 33.
[0091] Another possible configuration is to provide a wall that blocks the flow path of the third section, allowing the pressurized liquid and slurry to collide against the wall, thereby disintegrating and crushing the mineral particles. However, according to the inventor's research, since the mineral particles are dispersed in the liquid, the impact force from the collision is unlikely to be applied to the mineral particles themselves. This makes it difficult to achieve sufficient effects (especially sufficient crushing ability). Rather, as described above, by increasing the length L3 of the third section 33 compared to other sections and utilizing the Coriolis force together with the cavitation effect, the crushing ability of the mineral particles can be more effectively improved.
[0092] The inventors conducted a confirmatory experiment to verify the above-described effect of the third portion 33. In the confirmatory experiment, a fringe was placed at position R shown in Figure 5C, and soil treatment was performed using the soil treatment device 1a. The surface condition of the fringe after treatment was observed. Figure 6 is a schematic top view of the fringe used in the experiment, showing the surface located on the flow path side. Observation revealed that the central portion 35c of the surface of the fringe 35 was worn. This is believed to be due to the impact of high-pressure water. Furthermore, rust was observed in the right-hand portion 352 of the central portion 35c, located to the right of the direction of flow of the pressurized liquid, but not in the left-hand portion 351. This is believed to be due to the formation of irregularities in the right-hand portion 352 caused by the collision of relatively heavy particles. These results confirmed that, in the third portion of the flow path, the slurry flows while heavy and light particles are separated by the Coriolis force.
[0093] <Tapered section> As shown in Figures 4 and 5A, the flow path 30 may further have a tapered section 34 between the first section 31 and the second section 32, in which the cross-sectional area decreases from the first section 31 toward the second section 32.
[0094] Large vortices 82, such as those in the first section 31, are less likely to form inside the tapered section 34. This allows the slurry 40 to flow more smoothly into the smaller-diameter second section 32. The tapered section 34 makes it less likely for the slurry 40 or the soil in the slurry 40 to clog the downstream end of the first section 31. This makes it possible to prevent a decrease in treatment speed due to clogging, especially when the soil contains small particles (such as clay or silt particles) or when the soil has a wide particle size distribution. The inclination angle α of the inner surface of the tapered section 34 is not particularly limited, but may be, for example, 45° or less. This more effectively prevents clogging.
[0095] (Slurry supply section) As shown in FIG. 4, the slurry supply unit 4 includes a hopper 41, a liquid supply unit 5, and a soil supply unit 6.
[0096] <Hopper> The hopper 41 has an upper opening 411 and a lower opening 412. The hopper 41 has a tapered shape in which the inner diameter decreases from the upper opening 411 toward the lower opening 412. The upper opening 411 is, for example, an opening facing vertically upward. The lower opening 412 is fluidly connected to the first portion 31 of the flow path 30 of the processing unit 3. In this embodiment, the hopper 41 has a truncated cone shape, but may also have a truncated polygonal pyramid shape.
[0097] The hopper 41 is configured to mix the liquid 50 and the soil 10, which are separately supplied from the upper opening 411, on the inner wall of the hopper 41 to form a slurry 40, which is then discharged from the lower opening 412. The slurry 40 that has flowed out from the lower opening 412 is supplied to the flow path 30 of the treatment section 3.
[0098] <Liquid supply section> The liquid supply unit 5 supplies liquid 50 from the upper opening 411 toward the inner wall of the hopper 41. The liquid 50 is, for example, water. The liquid supply unit 5 includes a centrifugal submersible pump (capacity: for example, 40 L / m x 4.2 m x 0.1 kW x 100 V) 53 and a liquid line 51 connected to the submersible pump 53. The liquid line 51 is provided with a liquid supply port that supplies the liquid to the hopper 41. The liquid supply unit 5 is set to supply water to the hopper 41 at a flow rate of, for example, 0.05 liters / second.
[0099] The liquid line 51 has a portion that extends along at least a portion of the periphery of the upper opening 411 of the hopper 41. In the example shown in FIG. 4 , the liquid line 51 has an annular portion 511 that extends annularly along the periphery of the upper opening 411. The annular portion 511 is provided with a plurality of liquid supply ports that supply the liquid 50 toward the inner wall of the hopper 41. The term "annular" is not limited to a circular annular shape but also includes a polygonal annular shape such as a rectangular annular shape. The periphery of the upper opening 411 may be circular and the annular portion 511 may be a rectangular annular shape. In this example, the portion of the liquid line 51 that extends along the periphery of the upper opening 411 is annular, but it may also be arc-shaped, linear, or the like.
[0100] When the soil treatment device 1a is operating, the liquid supply rate (here, the water supply rate) from the liquid line 51 to the hopper 41 is, for example, 0.05 liters / second. The supply rate is not particularly limited and is set appropriately depending on the soil supply rate, the flow rate of the pressurized liquid, etc. It is also possible to change the liquid supply rate via the control unit 8 during operation depending on the operating state of the soil treatment device, etc.
[0101] <Soil Supply Department> The soil supply unit 6 supplies soil 10 from the upper opening 411 toward the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the soil supply unit 6 includes a soil storage tank 61 that stores the soil 10, and a conveying device 62 that conveys the soil 10 supplied from the soil storage tank 61. The conveying device 62 is, for example, a belt conveyor. The soil 10 supplied to the conveying device 62 is conveyed to a predetermined input position Q above the hopper 41, and is supplied from the input position Q to the hopper 41. The soil is supplied at a rate of 1 kg / min, for example.
[0102] Fig. 7A is a schematic top perspective view of the conveying device and the hopper, and Fig. 7B is a schematic cross-sectional view taken along line VIIB-VIIB shown in Fig. 7A.
[0103] 7A and 7B, the conveying device 62 is provided with a belt 621 that conveys the soil 10 above the hopper 41 to a loading position Q. The loading position Q is located inside the upper opening 411 of the hopper 41 in a plan view. The belt 621 is configured to move in one direction (here, the -X direction) to the loading position Q, then make a downward U-turn at the loading position Q and move in the opposite direction (here, the +X direction). In this way, the soil 10 on the belt 621 is supplied from the loading position Q toward the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41.
[0104] The position and conveying speed of the conveying device 62 are set so that the soil 10 is supplied, for example, to a region 410 near the upper end of the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41. The height of the region 410 in the Z direction from the lower opening 412 of the hopper 41 is, for example, at least half the height H of the hopper 41. This increases the distance that the soil 10 flows on the inner wall 41s together with the liquid 50, allowing the soil 10 and the liquid 50 to be thoroughly mixed.
[0105] In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 7B, the inertial force generated by the transport can be used to cause heavy and light particles of the soil 10 to fall to different positions on the inner wall 41s. For example, if the soil 10 contains gravel particles 11, sand particles 12, and mineral particles 13 in descending order of weight, the heavier particles fall more upstream (toward the +X side) in the transport direction. In this way, when the soil 10 is introduced, clumps of the soil 10 can be loosened, making it easier to mix with the liquid 50. This allows for the formation of a more uniform slurry 40. Furthermore, it is possible to more effectively prevent clumps of soil from remaining in the soil from being supplied to the treatment unit 3.
[0106] 7A, the input position Q is offset from the center C of the lower opening 412 in a plan view. By offsetting the input position Q from the center C of the lower opening 412, the soil 10 can be more reliably supplied to the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the input particles of the soil 10 from being sent directly from the lower opening 412 to the treatment section 3 without being mixed with the liquid 50.
[0107] In a plan view, the input position Q may be located downstream of the center C of the lower opening 412 in the conveying direction (-X direction in FIGS. 7A and 7B) of the conveying device 62. With this configuration, particles in the soil 10 tend to fly out from the input position Q toward the opposing portion of the inner wall 41s due to inertial force and fall onto the inner wall 41s. This makes it possible to prevent particles from falling into the lower opening 412 without coming into contact with the inner wall 41s. Furthermore, even relatively heavy particles tend to fall into the region 410 near the upper end of the inner wall 41s, allowing them to be sufficiently mixed with the liquid 50.
[0108] The conveying device 62 may further include an adjustment member 622 for adjusting the height of the soil 10, located upstream of the input position Q on the belt. The adjustment member 622 extends across the width of the belt 621 in a plan view. The lower end of the adjustment member 622 is disposed a predetermined distance t in the Z direction from the upper surface of the belt 621. By providing the adjustment member 622, the height of the soil 10 on the belt 621 can be kept equal to or less than the distance t. This makes it possible to prevent clogging of the treatment section 3 due to an increase in the amount of soil 10 supplied. Furthermore, the amount of soil 10 supplied per unit time to the hopper 41 can be kept roughly constant.
[0109] <Classification Department> As shown in FIG. 4, a mixture 70 obtained by mixing pressurized liquid 20 and slurry 40 is sent to the classification unit 7 from the outlet 37 of the processing unit 3. The classification unit 7 classifies the mixture 70 into a large particle group having a particle size equal to or larger than a predetermined classification point, and a small particle group having a particle size less than the classification point and having a higher radioactive concentration than the large particle group. In this embodiment, classification is performed using a vibrating sieve, but this is not limited to a vibrating sieve, and various other known classification devices can be used. Classification may be performed in multiple stages.
[0110] In the example shown in FIG. 4, the classification unit 7 includes a sieve 72 with 2 mm openings and a sieve 73 with 75 μm openings located downstream of the sieve 72. As a result, gravel particles 11 are removed by the sieve 72, and sand particles 12 are removed by the sieve 73. The mixture 70 that passes through the sieve 72 is muddy water containing particles with a particle size of less than 75 μm, such as clay and silt, including mineral particles 13. Most of the radioactive material is contained in the muddy water. The muddy water may be further classified, for example, by a high-mesh separator.
[0111] When a sludge thawing process is performed in the cavitation generation region Rc to separate mineral particles with adsorbed radioactive substances from soil particles, the classification unit 7 may be configured to classify the mixture 70 into a large particle group including soil particles (e.g., particle size 75 μm or more) and a small particle group including mineral particles (e.g., particle size less than 75 μm) (see Figure 3B).
[0112] Alternatively, when sludge thawing and mineral particle crushing are performed in the cavitation generation region Rc, the classification unit 7 may be configured to classify the mixture 70 into a group of large particles having a particle size equal to or larger than the particle size of the mineral particles (e.g., 20 μm) and a group of small particles having a particle size smaller than the mineral particles (see Figure 3A).
[0113] (Control unit) The control unit 8 is configured to control the operations of, for example, the ejection unit 2, the liquid supply unit 5, and the soil supply unit 6. This makes it possible to adjust the mixture ratio of the soil 10 and the liquid 50 contained in the slurry 40, the flow rate of the pressurized liquid 20, and the like, as appropriate, depending on, for example, the type and condition of the soil 10 to be treated, the operating condition of the soil treatment device 1a, and the like.
[0114] (effect) In the soil treatment apparatus 1a of this embodiment, as illustrated in Figures 4 to 5C, the flow path 30 of the treatment unit 3 has an expansion section 36 that expands the cross-sectional area downstream of the slurry supply position P. The slurry supply unit 4 and the discharge unit 2 are configured so that the difference in flow velocity between the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 is greater downstream of the expansion section 36 than upstream of the expansion section 36, and the amount of bubbles 81 generated by cavitation increases.
[0115] With this configuration, the pressure of the slurry 40 drops sharply downstream of the expansion section 36. Furthermore, because the flow velocity of the slurry 40 decreases, the flow velocity ratio between the slurry 40 and the pressurized liquid 20 increases. Therefore, the amount of bubbles 81 generated by cavitation can be increased downstream of the expansion section 36 compared to upstream of the expansion section 36. As a result, the mineral particles in the slurry 40 can be further separated. Furthermore, because the flow velocity of the slurry 40 decreases downstream of the expansion section 36, the effect of the Coriolis force increases. Therefore, the particles in the slurry 40 flow separately according to their weight, and the impact force generated when the bubbles collapse can be more efficiently applied to relatively light particles, such as mineral particles.
[0116] Furthermore, the above configuration can lengthen the cavitation generation region Rc within the flow path 30. Since it is possible to continue generating cavitation within the flow path 30, the processing time for thawing and crushing the mineral particles in the slurry 40 can be extended without increasing the amount of water used.
[0117] Furthermore, in the soil treatment apparatus 1a of this embodiment, the slurry supply unit 4 includes a hopper 41, a soil supply unit 6 that supplies soil 10 toward the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41, and a liquid supply unit 5 that supplies liquid 50 toward the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41. The soil supply unit 6 and the liquid supply unit 5 are configured so that the liquid 50 and the soil 10 are mixed on the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41 to form slurry 40, which is supplied from a lower opening 412 of the hopper 41 to the flow path 30 of the treatment unit 3.
[0118] With this configuration, the soil 10 and the liquid 50 can be mixed more reliably while keeping the amount of the liquid 50 small. Therefore, it is possible to reduce the overall solid-liquid ratio.
[0119] Furthermore, with the above configuration, the slurry 40 having a substantially constant mixture ratio (mixture ratio of the soil 10 to the liquid 50) can be continuously supplied to the treatment section 3 at a substantially constant speed. Furthermore, the mixture ratio of the liquid 50 to the soil 10 can be easily adjusted. For example, the mixture ratio can be adjusted by the control section 8 during operation.
[0120] Furthermore, with the above configuration, even if the soil 10 contains relatively small particles such as clay, the particles are less likely to adhere to the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41 because they come into contact with the liquid 50 on the inner wall 41s. This reduces the frequency of maintenance.
[0121] Furthermore, compared to the case where a pre-prepared slurry is transported and supplied to the processing section, the above configuration eliminates the need for a stirring operation, a large mixing device, or a slurry transport device, thereby reducing the cost required to form the slurry 40. Also, since there is no need to transport the slurry, there is no need to increase the amount of liquid to make it easier to transport the slurry.
[0122] Furthermore, with the above configuration, the liquid 50 can be mixed with the amount of soil 10 flowing down the hopper 41 without stirring, etc. This is advantageous because, when the soil 10 contains radioactive materials, dust containing the radioactive materials is less likely to fly up.
[0123] In the soil treatment apparatus 1a of this embodiment, the liquid supply unit 5 includes a liquid line 51 that extends along at least a portion of the periphery of the upper opening 411 of the hopper 41 and transports the liquid 50, and multiple liquid supply ports that are spaced apart from one another on the liquid line 51 and discharge the liquid 50. This configuration facilitates supplying the liquid 50 near the upper end of the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41. Furthermore, because the liquid 50 tends to flow circumferentially on the inner wall 41s due to inertial force, the path along which the liquid 50 flows can be lengthened. This allows the liquid 50 and the soil 10 to be mixed more reliably. Furthermore, providing multiple liquid supply ports allows the liquid 50 to flow over a wider area of the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41. This prevents soil particles from adhering to the inner wall 41s.
[0124] Furthermore, according to this embodiment, in a soil treatment method including a cavitation generation step, as shown in FIG. 5A, it is possible to control the flow velocity difference between the pressurized liquid 20 and the slurry 40 so that the amount of bubbles generated by cavitation decreases and then increases again while the pressurized liquid 20 flows together with the slurry 40 in the ejection direction. In this method, in the cavitation generation step, the mineral particles in the slurry 40 can be thawed or crushed not only immediately after the pressurized liquid 20 collides with the slurry 40, but also after the amount of bubbles generated increases again. Therefore, thawing or crushing can be carried out more efficiently while reducing the amount of liquid used.
[0125] (Variation 1: Slurry Supply Unit) The slurry supply unit 4 may be configured so that the liquid 50 and the soil 10 flow downward while swirling on the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41, and are mixed during this process to form the slurry 40. With this configuration, the soil 10 and the liquid 50 can be mixed more reliably and more uniformly.
[0126] Figure 8A is a schematic perspective view showing a modified example of the liquid supply unit and the hopper, and Figure 8B is a top view of the modified example shown in Figure 8A.
[0127] 8A and 8B, the liquid line 51 includes an annular portion 511 that extends annularly along the periphery of the upper opening 411 of the hopper 41. A plurality of liquid supply ports 512 are arranged at intervals in the annular portion 511. A nozzle 52 extending downward is connected to each liquid supply port 512. As shown in FIG. 8B, in a plan view along the height direction (Z direction) of the hopper 41, the extension direction of the nozzle 52 is inclined at an angle θ (0°<θ<90°) to the flow direction of the liquid 50 flowing through the annular portion 511 with respect to the direction d from the liquid supply port 512 toward the center C of the lower opening 412. The angle θ is, for example, 20° or greater.
[0128] With this configuration, the liquid 50 from the nozzle 52 tends to flow in a circumferential direction due to inertial force, and the liquid 50 tends to flow downward together with the soil 10 while swirling on the inner wall 41s of the hopper 41. Therefore, the path for mixing the liquid 50 and the soil 10 is longer, and the liquid 50 and the soil 10 can be mixed more reliably and more uniformly.
[0129] 8A and 8B, all of the nozzles 52 are inclined at the same angle θ with respect to the direction d, but the angles θ may be different from one another. Furthermore, if the nozzle 52 provided in at least one liquid supply port 512 is inclined with respect to the direction d, the effect of causing the liquid 50 to flow in a swirling manner can be obtained.
[0130] (Variation 2: Flow path of processing section) FIG. 9 is a schematic cross-sectional view illustrating a modified example of a flow path. The flow path 30 shown in FIG. 9 has multiple expansion sections 36 downstream of the slurry supply position P. The multiple expansion sections 36 are spaced apart from one another. In this example, a fourth section 320 having a smaller cross-sectional area than the third section 33 is connected downstream of the third section 33, and a fifth section 330 having a larger cross-sectional area than the fourth section 320 is connected downstream of the fourth section 320, in this order. The fourth section 320 and the fifth section 330 form an expansion section 36 that promotes the generation of cavitation. The cross-sectional area of the fourth section 320 may be the same as or different from that of the second section 32. Similarly, the cross-sectional area of the fifth section 330 may be the same as or different from that of the third section 33. The flow path 30 may alternate between the fourth section 320 and the fifth section 330 downstream of the third section 33, thereby providing more expansion sections 36.
[0131] According to this configuration, by providing a plurality of enlarged portions 36 in the flow path 30, the cavitation generation region Rc can be further lengthened.
[0132] (Example) In order to confirm the effect of this embodiment, a mica crushing experiment was conducted using the soil treatment device 1a shown in Figure 4, and the method and results are described below. Here, instead of actual soil, commercially available vermiculite containing only dried mica as the main component was used as the treated material, and the particle size distribution after treatment was measured.
[0133] <Method of crushing experiment> In the example, 1 kg of vermiculite was supplied together with liquid (water) 50 to the slurry supply unit 4 of the soil treatment device 1a shown in Fig. 4, and passed through the flow path 30 of the treatment unit to carry out a disintegration treatment using cavitation. The treatment conditions, such as the supply rate of the material to be treated (vermiculite), the flow rate of water to be mixed with the vermiculite, and the conditions for ejecting the pressurized liquid (pressurized water), were set to be the same as the conditions exemplified with reference to Fig. 4.
[0134] Next, the mixture 70 (a mixture of the treated vermiculite-containing slurry and pressurized water) discharged from the flow path 30 was collected in a storage container and thoroughly stirred. After that, a certain amount of the mixture was collected from the bottom and the top of the container, mixed, and used as a measurement sample.
[0135] <Comparative Example> As a comparative example, 1 kg of vermiculite was passed through a comparative apparatus that did not have a pressurized water outlet, together with water, and the particle size distribution of the vermiculite was then measured. The comparative apparatus was an apparatus for producing a slurry under the same conditions as in the examples and measuring the particle size distribution.
[0136] Fig. 10 is a schematic side view of an apparatus of a comparative example. The apparatus 101 of the comparative example differs from the soil treatment apparatus 1a shown in Fig. 4 in that it does not have a high-pressure ejector that ejects pressurized water, and in that the cross-sectional area of the flow path 30 is approximately constant. The flow path 30 of the apparatus 101 is inclined downward (in the -Z direction) with respect to the horizontal direction.
[0137] In the comparative example, 1 kg of vermiculite was supplied to the slurry supply section together with water and passed through the flow path 30. The supply rate of the material to be treated (vermiculite) and the flow rate of water mixed with the vermiculite were the same as in the example. Next, a measurement sample was collected from the mixture 70 discharged from the flow path 30 in the same manner as in the example.
[0138] In the comparative example, the vermiculite is not subjected to impact forces due to the collision of pressurized water or cavitation. Therefore, the particle size distribution of the measurement sample obtained in the comparative example is substantially the same as the particle size distribution of the vermiculite supplied to the apparatus in the comparative example. Therefore, the particle size distribution measured in the comparative example can be considered to be substantially the same as the particle size distribution of the vermiculite before the crushing experiment in the example.
[0139] <Comparison of particle size distribution> 11A and 11B are photographs showing the measurement samples of the Example and Comparative Example, respectively. These photographs confirm that the particle size of the vermiculite after the crushing experiment of the Example is clearly smaller than the particle size of the vermiculite of the Comparative Example.
[0140] Next, in order to compare particle size distributions in a small particle size range that is difficult to confirm visually, the particle size distributions of the measurement samples of the Examples and Comparative Examples were measured. Here, the measurement samples of the Examples and Comparative Examples were classified to remove particles with particle sizes of 0.212 mm or more, and then the particle size distribution of the remaining particles was measured by laser diffraction.
[0141] 11C is a graph showing particle size accumulation curves obtained by laser diffraction in the Examples and Comparative Examples. The results shown in FIG. 11C show that the ratio of particles having particle sizes of 0.02 mm to 0.04 mm is higher in the Examples than in the Comparative Examples. This suggests that in the Examples, some of the vermiculite particles (e.g., particles having a particle size of 0.2 mm or more) were crushed to a particle size of, for example, around 0.02 mm.
[0142] 11A to 11C, it is confirmed that the soil treatment device 1a of this embodiment has sufficient crushing ability for mineral particles such as vermiculite. Note that, although vermiculite was used as the material to be treated here, it is believed that a certain level of crushing ability will be exhibited even when soil containing a mixture of vermiculite and other soil particles is used.
[0143] (Other variations) The soil treatment device and soil treatment method of the present invention are not limited to the device and method exemplified in FIGS.
[0144] 1, 4, 8A, and 8B, the slurry supply unit 4 includes a hopper 41, but the unit may not include a hopper. For example, a premixed slurry may be transported by a pipe, and the pipe may be connected to a flow path of the treatment unit. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the soil and liquid are separately supplied to the hopper, but a premixed slurry may be supplied to the hopper.
[0145] It is also possible to treat soil using multiple soil treatment devices according to the first and second embodiments. In this case, the mixture discharged from the multiple soil treatment devices may be sent to a common classifying section or a common classifying device. For example, the flow paths of the multiple soil treatment devices may be joined together and sent to a common classifying section.
[0146] The apparatus and method having the configurations illustrated in FIGS. 1 to 9 can be widely applied to soil containing radioactive materials. For example, they can also be applied to soil containing organic components. They are also applicable to the purification of soil containing impurities such as oil, and soil sterilization, in addition to soil containing radioactive materials. Furthermore, the object to be treated is not limited to soil, and various powders and granular materials can be used. By applying this apparatus or method, cavitation can be used to efficiently separate particles contained in a slurry, disperse particles, separate particles from impurities, and pulverize particles.
[0147] The slurry supply device (slurry supply unit) described above with reference to FIGS. 4, 8A, and 8B can be applied to various processing devices. The slurry supply device can be widely applied to devices for separating soil particles (including mineral particles) from other particles and deposits in soil by utilizing cavitation (see FIGS. 2A and 2B) generated by the difference in flow velocity between the slurry and the pressurized liquid. By applying the slurry supply device, the solid-liquid ratio in the slurry can be reduced, thereby enabling more efficient separation of soil particles. Furthermore, the amount of liquid contained in the slurry can be reduced, thereby reducing the cost of liquid purification after treatment. Furthermore, since operations such as stirring are not required during slurry formation, radioactive materials are less likely to scatter. The slurry supply device can also be applied to devices for separating soil particles from radioactive materials by methods other than those described in the above embodiments.
[0148] The above-described slurry supply device can also be applied to a purification device that separates soil particles from impurities such as oil, a device for sterilizing soil particles, etc. Furthermore, it can also be applied to devices that disperse, mix, crush, polish, etc. powder and granular materials other than soil. This can achieve the same effects as the above-described embodiment, such as reducing the amount of liquid to be mixed with soil or powder and granular materials.
[0149] The present disclosure is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and design modifications are possible without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure. Furthermore, by appropriately combining the configurations of any of the various embodiments (including modified examples) illustrated, the effects of each embodiment can be achieved.
[0150] This specification discloses soil treatment methods described in the following items. [Item 1] 1. A method for treating soil containing mineral particles having radioactive material adsorbed thereon, comprising: a pressurized liquid is injected into a slurry obtained by mixing a liquid with the soil, and a flow velocity difference is generated at an interface between the pressurized liquid and the slurry, thereby generating cavitation; The soil treatment method, wherein the mineral particles are separated from other particles by the impact force generated when the bubbles generated by the cavitation collapse. [Item 2] The soil further includes soil particles having a particle size larger than that of the mineral particles, 2. The soil treatment method according to item 1, wherein the impact force separates the mineral particles attached to or encapsulated in the soil particles from the soil particles. [Item 3] 3. The soil treatment method according to item 2, wherein the impact force crushes the mineral particles separated from the soil particles into particles having a smaller particle size than the mineral particles. [Item 4] 2. The soil treatment method according to item 1, wherein the impact force causes the particles to be smaller in size than the mineral particles. [Item 5] 5. The soil treatment method according to any one of items 1 to 4, wherein the radioactive substance is radioactive cesium and the mineral is mica. [Item 6] 6. The soil treatment method according to any one of items 1 to 5, wherein the ratio of the weight of the liquid used, including the liquid and the pressurized liquid, to the dry weight of the soil to be treated is 5 or more and 15 or less. [Item 7] 4. The soil treatment method according to item 2 or 3, wherein the soil particles have a particle size of 0.075 mm or more, and the mineral particles have a particle size of less than 0.075 mm. [Item 8] 4. The soil treatment method according to item 2 or 3, further comprising classifying the mixture of the slurry and the pressurized liquid after generating the cavitation into a large particle group containing the soil particles and a small particle group containing the mineral particles. [Item 9] 5. The soil treatment method according to item 4, further comprising classifying the mixture of the slurry and the pressurized liquid after generating the cavitation into a group of particles having particle sizes equal to or larger than the particle sizes of the mineral particles and a group of particles having particle sizes smaller than the mineral particles. [Item 10] 10. The soil treatment method according to any one of items 1 to 9, wherein generating cavitation includes controlling the flow velocity difference so that an amount of generated bubbles decreases and then increases while the pressurized liquid flows together with the slurry in the ejection direction.
[0151] This specification discloses a soil treatment device described in the following items. [Item 1] A soil treatment device that performs a process on soil containing mineral particles to which radioactive substances are adsorbed, to separate the mineral particles from other particles, a processing section having a flow path; an ejection unit that ejects pressurized liquid from an upstream side toward a downstream side of the flow path; a supply unit connected to the flow path downstream of the outlet unit and configured to supply a slurry obtained by mixing the soil with a liquid toward the pressurized liquid ejected by the outlet unit; The soil treatment device, wherein the outlet section and the supply section are configured to generate a flow velocity difference at the interface between the pressurized liquid and the slurry, thereby generating cavitation. [Item 2] The soil is a mixture of particles of the mineral and soil particles having a particle size larger than that of the mineral particles, Item 2. The soil treatment device according to item 1, wherein the emission unit and the supply unit are configured to separate the mineral particles attached to or contained within the soil particles from the soil particles by the impact force generated when the bubbles generated by the cavitation collapse. [Item 3] Item 3. The soil treatment device according to item 2, wherein the ejection unit and the supply unit are configured to crush the mineral particles separated from the soil particles by the impact force into particles having a particle size smaller than the mineral particles. [Item 4] Item 2. The soil treatment device according to item 1, wherein the emission unit and the supply unit include a process of crushing the mineral particles into particles having a particle size smaller than the mineral particles by the impact force generated when the bubbles generated by the cavitation collapse. [Item 5] the flow path includes an enlarged portion that enlarges a cross-sectional area perpendicular to an extension direction of the flow path, downstream of a position where the supply portion is connected, 5. The soil treatment device according to any one of items 1 to 4, wherein the outlet section and the supply section are configured such that the flow velocity difference is greater downstream of the expansion section than upstream of the expansion section, thereby increasing the amount of bubbles generated by the cavitation. [Item 6] The supply unit includes: a hopper having a tapered shape in which the inner diameter decreases from an upper opening toward a lower opening; a soil supply unit that supplies the soil from the upper opening toward an inner wall of the hopper; a liquid supply unit that supplies the liquid from the upper opening toward the inner wall of the hopper, 6. The soil treatment device according to any one of items 1 to 5, wherein the soil supply unit and the liquid supply unit are configured so that the liquid and the soil are mixed on the inner wall of the hopper to form the slurry, and the slurry is supplied to the flow path from the lower opening. [Item 7] 4. The soil treatment device according to item 2 or 3, further comprising a classification unit fluidly connected to the downstream side of the flow path and configured to classify the mixture of the pressurized liquid and the slurry into a large particle group including the soil particles and a small particle group including the mineral particles. [Item 8] 5. The soil treatment device according to item 4, further comprising a classifier fluidly connected to the downstream side of the flow path and configured to classify the mixture of the pressurized liquid and the slurry into a group of particles having particle sizes equal to or larger than the mineral particles and a group of particles having particle sizes smaller than the mineral particles. [Item 9] 9. The soil treatment device according to any one of items 1 to 8, wherein the radioactive substance is radioactive cesium and the mineral is mica.
[0152] This specification also discloses soil treatment devices described in the following items. [Item 1] A soil treatment device that performs a process on soil containing mineral particles to which radioactive substances are adsorbed, to separate the mineral particles from other particles, a processing section having a flow path; an ejection unit that ejects pressurized liquid from the upstream side toward the downstream side of the flow path, the ejection unit is configured to eject the pressurized liquid into a slurry obtained by mixing the soil with a liquid within the flow path, and to generate a flow velocity difference at an interface between the pressurized liquid and the slurry, thereby generating cavitation; The flow path is The first part, a second portion located downstream of the first portion and having a cross-sectional area perpendicular to the extending direction of the flow path smaller than that of the first portion; a third portion located downstream of the second portion and having a cross-sectional area larger than that of the second portion. [Item 2] 2. The soil treatment device according to item 1, wherein the flow path is configured so that the amount of bubbles generated by the cavitation is greater in the third portion than in the second portion. [Item 3] a supply portion connected to the first portion and supplying the slurry; 3. The soil treatment device according to claim 1, wherein the length of the third portion is greater than the length of the flow path from a position where the supply unit is connected to the upstream end of the third portion. [Item 4] the outlet portion includes a nozzle portion having an outlet port for outletting the pressurized liquid, and a pipe located upstream of the nozzle portion and connected to the nozzle portion, the nozzle portion being configured such that a cross-sectional area increases from the outlet port toward the pipe, 4. The soil treatment device according to any one of items 1 to 3, wherein the cross-sectional area of the second portion is larger than the cross-sectional area of the piping of the outlet portion. [Item 5] The flow path is a fourth portion located on the third portion side and having a cross-sectional area smaller than that of the third portion; 3. The soil treatment device according to item 1 or 2, further comprising a fifth section located downstream of the fourth section and having a cross-sectional area larger than that of the fourth section. [Item 6] 6. The soil treatment device according to any one of items 1 to 5, wherein the flow path further includes a tapered section between the first portion and the second portion, the cross-sectional area of which decreases from the first portion toward the second portion.
[0153] This specification discloses a slurry supply device described in the following items. [Item 1] A slurry supplying device that supplies slurry mixed with liquid to soil, a hopper having a tapered shape in which the inner diameter decreases from an upper opening toward a lower opening; a soil supply unit that supplies the soil from the upper opening toward an inner wall of the hopper; a liquid supply unit that supplies the liquid from the upper opening toward the inner wall, The soil supply unit and the liquid supply unit are configured so that the liquid and the soil are mixed on the inner wall to form the slurry, which then flows out from the lower opening. [Item 2] Item 2. The slurry supplying apparatus according to item 1, wherein the soil supplying unit and the liquid supplying unit are configured so that the liquid and the soil are mixed to form the slurry while flowing downward on the inner wall while swirling. [Item 3] The liquid supply unit includes: a liquid line extending along at least a portion of the periphery of the upper opening and conveying the liquid; 3. The slurry supply apparatus according to item 1 or 2, configured to include a plurality of liquid supply ports arranged at intervals in the liquid line and supplying the liquid to the hopper. [Item 4] the plurality of liquid supply ports include a first liquid supply port; a nozzle extending downward from the first liquid supply port is provided in the first liquid supply port; 4. The slurry supply device according to item 3, wherein, in a plan view seen along the height direction of the hopper, the extension direction of the nozzle is inclined with respect to the direction from the first liquid supply port toward the center of the lower opening. [Item 5] 5. The slurry supply device according to any one of items 1 to 4, wherein the soil supply unit is configured to supply the soil toward the inner wall from a supply position that is offset from the center of the lower opening in a plan view along the height direction of the hopper. [Item 6] Item 6. The slurry supply apparatus according to item 5, wherein the soil supply unit includes a conveying device that, in the plan view, conveys the soil from outside the upper opening to the loading position and drops the soil into the upper opening at the loading position. [Item 7] 7. The slurry supplying device according to item 6, wherein the input position is located downstream of the center of the lower opening in the conveying direction of the conveying device in the plan view. [Item 8] 8. The slurry supplying apparatus according to any one of items 1 to 7, wherein the soil is soil containing a radioactive material. [Item 9] A soil treatment device that separates soil particles contained in soil from other particles or attached matter, A supply unit including the slurry supply device according to any one of items 1 to 8; a flow path through which the slurry containing the soil is supplied from the supply unit; an ejection unit that ejects pressurized liquid from the upstream side toward the downstream side of the flow path, The soil treatment device, wherein the outlet section and the supply section are configured to generate a flow velocity difference at the interface between the pressurized liquid and the slurry, thereby generating cavitation. [Industrial Applicability]
[0154] The slurry supply device of the present invention can reduce the solid-liquid ratio of slurry in which soil is mixed with liquid, and is therefore useful for various soil treatments, including decontamination and volume reduction of contaminated soil containing radioactive materials. [Explanation of symbols]
[0155] 1, 1a Soil treatment equipment 2. Exit section 3 Processing section 4. Slurry supply section 5 Liquid supply section 6. Soil Supply Department 7 Classification Department 8 Control Unit 10. Soil 11 Gravel particles 12 sand particles 13 Mineral particles 15 Mineral particles containing radioactive materials 20 Pressurized Liquids 20s interface 22 nozzles 23 High-speed jet pump 24 Piping 30 flow path 31 Part 1 32 Part 2 33 Part 3 34 Tapered section 35 Fringe 35c central part 36 Enlarged section 37 Outlet 40 Slurry 41 Hopper 41s interior wall 50 liquid 51 Liquid Line 52 nozzles 53 Submersible Pump 61 Soil storage tank 62 Transport equipment 70 mixture 72, 73 sieve 80 space 81 Bubbles 82 Vortex 320 Part 4 330 Part 5 351 Left side part 352 Right side part 411 Upper opening 412 Lower opening 511 Circular section 512 Liquid supply port 621 Belt 622 Adjustment member C center d direction P Slurry supply position Q input position Rc Cavitation region
Claims
1. A slurry supplying device that supplies slurry mixed with liquid to soil, a hopper having a tapered shape in which the inner diameter decreases from an upper opening toward a lower opening; a soil supply unit that supplies the soil from the upper opening toward an inner wall of the hopper; a liquid supply unit that supplies the liquid from the upper opening toward the inner wall, The soil supply unit and the liquid supply unit are configured so that the liquid and the soil are mixed on the inner wall to form the slurry, which then flows out from the lower opening.
2. 2. The slurry supply device of claim 1, wherein the soil supply section and the liquid supply section are configured so that the liquid and the soil are mixed to form the slurry while flowing downward in a swirling manner on the inner wall.
3. The liquid supply unit includes: a liquid line extending along at least a portion of the periphery of the upper opening and conveying the liquid; 3. The slurry supplying apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: a plurality of liquid supply ports arranged at intervals in the liquid line for supplying the liquid to the hopper.
4. the plurality of liquid supply ports include a first liquid supply port; a nozzle extending downward from the first liquid supply port is provided in the first liquid supply port; 4. The slurry supply device according to claim 3, wherein, in a plan view along the height direction of the hopper, the extension direction of the nozzle is inclined with respect to the direction from the first liquid supply port toward the center of the lower opening.
5. 3. The slurry supply device according to claim 1, wherein the soil supply unit is configured to supply the soil toward the inner wall from a supply position offset from the center of the lower opening when viewed in a plan view along the height direction of the hopper.
6. The slurry supply device of claim 5, wherein the soil supply unit, in the plan view, includes a conveying device that transports the soil from outside the upper opening to the loading position and drops the soil into the upper opening at the loading position.
7. The slurry supplying device according to claim 6 , wherein the input position is located downstream of a center of the lower opening in a conveying direction of the conveying device in the plan view.
8. 3. The slurry supplying apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the soil contains radioactive materials.
9. A soil treatment device that separates soil particles contained in soil from attached matter, A supply unit including the slurry supply device according to claim 1 or 2; a flow path through which the slurry containing the soil is supplied from the supply unit; an ejection unit that ejects pressurized liquid from the upstream side toward the downstream side of the flow path, The soil treatment device, wherein the outlet section and the supply section are configured to generate a flow velocity difference at the interface between the pressurized liquid and the slurry, thereby generating cavitation.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Cleaning and volume reduction method of radioactive substance-contaminated soil
JP2013140021A