Delayed fracture property evaluation method, delayed fracture prediction method, program, and method for manufacturing press-molded product

Abstract

The present invention provides a technique with which it is possible to evaluate the influence of a shear condition for shearing to form a shear end surface on a delayed fracture characteristic of the shear end surface. Provided is a delayed fracture characteristic evaluation method for evaluating a delayed fracture characteristic of a shear end surface of a metal plate (10) made of a high-strength steel sheet, wherein: a test piece of the metal plate (10) having the shear end surface is prepared by shearing the metal plate (10); and then, the delayed fracture characteristic of the shear end surface with respect to a shear condition of the shearing is evaluated by setting the test piece in a hydrogen intrusion environment in a state in which a load stress is applied to the shear end surface of the test piece.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a technique suitable for evaluating delayed fracture at a sheared edge of a press-formed product manufactured from a metal sheet made of high-strength steel sheet, and a technique utilizing the evaluation technique. In this specification, high-strength steel sheet refers to a steel sheet with a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more. [Background technology]

[0002] Currently, automobiles are required to improve fuel efficiency and crashworthiness through weight reduction. To achieve both weight reduction and occupant protection in the event of a collision, there is a trend toward using high-strength steel sheets for the components that make up the body. In recent years, ultra-high-strength steel sheets with tensile strengths of 1470 MPa or more have also been used in car bodies. One of the issues when using high-strength steel sheets in car bodies is delayed fracture. Delayed fracture, which occurs at the edge after shearing, is a particularly important issue for high-strength steel sheets with tensile strengths of 980 MPa or more. The edge after shearing is also referred to as the sheared edge. It is known that large tensile stress remains at this sheared edge. For this reason, there is concern about the occurrence of delayed fracture at the sheared edge.

[0003] A method for evaluating delayed fracture at a sheared edge is, for example, the method described in Patent Document 1. The method described in Patent Document 1 describes evaluating hydrogen embrittlement of a thin steel plate by injecting hydrogen into a stressed test specimen. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0004] [Patent Document 1] Patent No. 5196926 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0005] Here, there are two types of sheared end faces in automotive parts: front trim and rear trim. The front trim is the part that is sheared before press forming. The rear trim is the part that is sheared after press forming. The latter, rear trim, occurs, for example, when a plate holder is required during draw forming. In this case, for example, after press forming, the excess flange for draw forming is sheared along the product outline (rear trim) (see Figure 9). In this type of post-trim, a pressed part that has already been shaped by press forming is restrained by a lower die and a plate holder along the part shape, and in the case of post-trim, shearing must be performed in this restrained state.

[0006] However, the shape of the constrained press part is not consistent due to variations such as deviation from the target part shape. This deviation occurs, for example, due to springback. Furthermore, because the shape is not consistent, the lower die or plate clamp is likely to not contact the part (metal plate) sufficiently. This means that there may be areas on the surface of the plate clamp or the lower die that do not come into contact with the part (metal plate) being constrained. In other words, there is a possibility that gaps may appear in the constraining area during shearing. From this, the inventors have come to the realization that the properties of the sheared end surface may be different between pre-trim, which is formed by shearing a flat metal plate before press forming, and post-trim, which is sheared after forming.

[0007] However, conventional evaluation methods for delayed fracture properties such as those described in Patent Document 1 do not particularly focus on evaluation of the sheared end surface of such a rear trim portion. Considering the production process of actual press-formed products, particularly mass-produced automobile parts, the delayed fracture evaluation associated with such rear trim portions is extremely important. The present invention has been made with this in mind. An object of the present invention is to provide a technique capable of evaluating the influence of shearing conditions in shearing to form a sheared edge on the delayed fracture properties of the sheared edge. [Means for solving the problem]

[0008] Based on the above findings, the inventors focused on the difference in shear conditions caused by the degree of improper contact of the metal sheet with the sheet clamp or lower die due to the shape change of the rear trim section before trim forming. The inventors then considered providing a method capable of quantitatively evaluating the influence of the shear edge on the delayed fracture characteristics. Furthermore, the inventors discovered that, as mentioned above, the sheet restraint conditions are important as shear conditions for rear trim.

[0009] In order to solve the problem, one aspect of the present invention is a delayed fracture property evaluation method for evaluating the delayed fracture property of a sheared end surface of a metal plate made of a high-strength steel plate, in which a test piece of the metal plate having the sheared end surface is prepared by shearing the metal plate, and the test piece is placed in a hydrogen penetration environment while a load stress is applied to the sheared end surface of the prepared test piece, thereby evaluating the delayed fracture property of the sheared end surface under the shearing conditions of the shearing. The shear condition to be used as a variable may be, for example, a constraint condition of the metal plate. [Effects of the Invention]

[0010] According to an aspect of the present invention, the delayed fracture properties of a sheared edge are evaluated according to the shearing conditions of shearing. Therefore, according to an aspect of the present invention, it is possible to evaluate the influence of the shearing conditions during the forming of a rear trim portion on the delayed fracture properties of the sheared edge. Note that this aspect of the present invention is suitable for evaluating the shearing conditions of a sheared edge caused by a rear trim that is cut after press forming. However, the present invention can also be applied to evaluating the shearing conditions of a sheared edge caused by a front trim.

[0011] Here, the shearing conditions during trim forming of the rear trim portion change depending on the state of constraint of the metal plate during shearing, etc. According to an aspect of the present invention, for example, it is possible to evaluate the critical stress for delayed fracture and whether or not delayed fracture will occur by taking into account the state of constraint of the metal plate during shearing. As a result, according to the aspects of the present invention, it is possible to further improve delayed fracture resistance when high-strength steel sheets are applied to various parts such as panel parts, structural and skeletal parts of automobiles.

[0012] Furthermore, according to this aspect of the present invention, the shear conditions during shear processing in preparing the test specimen can be adjusted using a spacer, thereby easily simulating the restraint state (shear conditions) during post-trim. As a result, according to this aspect of the present invention, the shear conditions can be easily quantified, and changes (adjustments) in the shear conditions can be easily reproduced. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0013] [Figure 1] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a processing flow for evaluating delayed fracture properties according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 2] This is a diagram showing a case where a lower die having a plate holder and a lower blade is in contact with a metal plate, but the plate holder is separated from the contact area of ​​the lower blade in a plan view (shearing condition A). [Figure 3] 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a shearing device for shearing a flat metal plate under shearing condition A. FIG. [Figure 4] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a case where the sheet holder is not in contact with the metal sheet but the lower die is in contact with the metal sheet in the shear standby state (shear condition B). [Figure 5] 10 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a shearing device for shearing a flat metal plate under shearing condition B. FIG. [Figure 6] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a case where, in a shear standby state, the sheet holder is in contact with the metal sheet, but the lower die is not in contact with the metal sheet near the lower blade contact portion (shear condition C). [Figure 7] 10 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a shearing device for shearing a flat metal plate under shearing condition C. FIG. [Figure 8] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of processing of a program according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 9] FIG. 2 is a top view showing a rear trim of a press-formed product in the embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0014] Next, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. (overview) First, an outline of this embodiment will be described. The inventors focused on how the sheet clamp contacts the metal sheet, which is the workpiece, and classified the sheet restraint defects during shearing in the post-trim into the following three patterns: A, B, and C. The sheet clamp contact pattern refers to the state of restraint of the metal sheet by the lower die and the sheet clamp. These defects are likely to occur when a press-formed product is sheared (during post-trim). That is, the present invention is a suitable technique for evaluating the delayed fracture properties of a sheared edge formed by post-trim.

[0015] A: The surface 2B of the plate holder 2 and the surface 1B of the lower die 1 are both in contact with the metal plate 10, constraining the metal plate 10, but the plate holder 2 is separated from the lower blade 1A in plan view (see Figure 2). B: When the surface 2B of the plate holder 2 is not in contact with the metal plate 10 in the shearing standby state, but the surface 1B of the lower die 1 is in contact with the metal plate 10 in the shearing standby state (see the metal plate 10 indicated by the dashed line in Figure 4). C: When the surface 2B of the sheet holder 2 is in contact with the metal sheet 10 in the shearing standby state, but the surface 1B of the lower die 1 is not in contact with the metal sheet 10 near the lower blade 1A (see Figure 6).

[0016] To simulate these defects in the contact states A, B, and C (sheet restraint states), the inventors used a spacer 4 interposed between the surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 (see FIG. 3, etc.). They then considered reproducing these defect states (sheet restraint states) by adjusting the position and thickness of the spacer 4. Furthermore, by adjusting the thickness H (height H) of the spacer 4 and the distance L, in plan view, of the spacer 4 from the lower blade 1A, they were able to quantitatively determine the degree of defect as a shearing condition. In this specification, the term "plan view" refers to a view from the shear direction. In the case of shear processing for preparing a test piece, the shear direction and the opposing direction of surface 1B of lower mold 1 and surface 2B of plate holder 2 are the same.

[0017] Then, a flat metal plate 10 was sheared under various shear conditions simulating the above-mentioned defective state to prepare test specimens. The test specimens thus prepared were then subjected to external stress loading by four-point bending or the like, and placed in a hydrogen penetration environment for a predetermined time. In this embodiment, the occurrence of delayed fracture was evaluated based on the placement time.

[0018] Next, referring to the above evaluation, the range of defective conditions for the sheet clamp that would not cause delayed fracture for a specific stress load was determined for each of categories A, B, and C. The specific stress load is, for example, the load applied to the sheared end face after shearing. Next, the press-formed part is subjected to a post-trim process under the shear conditions that prevent delayed fracture. This allows the production of press-formed parts with excellent delayed fracture resistance at the sheared edge. Regarding processing conditions other than the shearing conditions, the delayed fracture resistance of the sheared end surface may be evaluated separately.

[0019] Next, an example of this embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. (Delayed fracture property evaluation method) This embodiment is a delayed fracture property evaluation method for evaluating the delayed fracture property of a sheared end surface of a metal plate 10. The present invention is particularly effective when the metal plate 10 is a high-strength steel plate. In this embodiment, the process of evaluating the delayed fracture properties of the metal plate 10 to be evaluated includes a test step involving actual experiments and an evaluation step. The delayed fracture property evaluation method of this embodiment includes a first step 50A to a fourth step 50D, as shown in Fig. 1. The first step 50A to the third step 50C correspond to the testing step, and the fourth step 50D corresponds to the evaluation step.

[0020] <First step 50A> The first step 50A is a step of shearing a flat metal plate 10 to produce a test piece having a sheared end surface. In this embodiment, various test pieces are prepared by adjusting the shearing conditions of the shearing process. In this embodiment, the constraint conditions of the plate during shearing are exemplified as the shear conditions to be adjusted. However, other shear conditions such as the clearance amount may be used as variables to evaluate the delayed fracture properties for the shear conditions. In this embodiment, for each classification of plate restraint failure conditions that are likely to occur during post-trim, the shear conditions are quantified (variable) using the spacer 4, and test specimens are prepared. The test specimens are, for example, in a rectangular shape for easy evaluation. Furthermore, the poor conditions for plate restraint are classified into three categories, A, B, and C, as described above.

[0021] [Preparation of test specimens for shear condition A (classification A)] Under the poor restraint condition of shearing condition A, as shown in Figure 2, the opposing surfaces 2B of the sheet clamp 2 and 1B of the lower die 1 come into contact with the metal sheet 10, firmly restraining the metal sheet 10. However, in a plan view, the sheet clamp 2 is separated from the position of the lower blade 1A. Note that the surfaces 2B of the sheet clamp 2 and 1B of the lower die 1 each face the metal sheet 10 that they are restraining.

[0022] In other words, in the restrained state shown in Figure 2, in the actual production process of press-molded products, such as mass production, the metal sheet 10 is firmly restrained by the surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the surface 2B of the plate holder 2. However, in plan view, there is a separation distance L' between the plate holder 2 and the lower blade 1A. In this specification, the separation direction refers to the direction in which the upper blade 3A and the lower blade 1A face each other in plan view. The same applies hereinafter.

[0023] 2 simulates a state in which, in a shear standby state, there is an area in the metal sheet 10 near the contact point of the lower blade 1A where the metal sheet 10 and the surface 2B of the sheet holder 2 are not in contact in a plan view. In this state, the distance L' between the sheet holder 2 and the lower blade 1A indicates, in a plan view, how far from the lower blade 1A the surface 2B of the sheet holder 2 is not in contact with the metal sheet 10. This distance L' can be a variable for the degree of defect (constraint condition).

[0024] To simulate the defective state (constraint condition) of this contact, spacers 4 were used to reproduce these defective states (see Figure 3). The thickness H and position of the spacers 4 were adjusted to give quantitativeness to the degree of defect. The position is adjusted by adjusting the separation distance L. Similarly, for shear conditions B and C described below, the use of spacers 4 also gives quantitativeness to the degree of defect. The material used for the spacer 4 is preferably a metal-based material, which allows negligible deformation of the spacer 4. However, other materials such as hard rubber can also be used as the material for the spacer 4. The spacer 4 has a flat plate shape with a constant thickness along the separation direction.

[0025] Figure 3 shows a schematic diagram of the shearing device used to reproduce the shearing condition A in the shearing process for preparing test specimens. The shearing device shown in FIG. 3 includes a lower die 1 having a lower blade 1A at its shoulder, an upper die 3 having an upper blade 3A at its shoulder, and a sheet clamp 2. The lower die 1 is, for example, a die, and the upper die 3 is, for example, a punch. The shearing device is configured so that surface 1B of the lower die 1 and surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 can restrain the metal sheet 10 during shearing. With the metal sheet 10 restrained, the upper blade 3A is moved relative to the lower blade 1A in the shearing direction, thereby shearing the metal sheet 10. At this time, the clearance ΔC between the upper blade 3A and the lower blade 1A is set to a preset value, and shearing is performed.

[0026] The shearing apparatus shown in Fig. 3 is a shearing apparatus for producing test pieces. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 3, surface 1B of lower die 1 that contacts flat metal plate 10 and surface 2B of plate holder 2 are both flat surfaces. 3 is configured such that a spacer 4 is interposed between the metal plate 10 and the surface 2B of the plate holder 2. The spacer 4 is a flat plate-shaped member. The spacer 4 is capable of moving toward and away from the lower blade 1A along the surface of the surface 2B of the plate holder 2.

[0027] In the shearing apparatus shown in FIG. 3, at least one of the distance L of the spacer 4 from the lower blade 1A in a plan view and the height H of the spacer 4 is set as a variable (adjustment amount) in shearing condition A. In other words, the distance L and height H of the spacer 4 set the distance by which the sheet holder 2 is separated from the metal sheet 10 near the contact point of the lower blade 1A with the metal sheet. By adjusting the distance L and height H of the spacer 4 as variables in shearing condition A, it is possible to produce test pieces for each variable value in shearing condition A. The units of the distance L and height H are [mm].

[0028] Here, in the shearing process under shearing condition A, the thickness H of the spacer 4 is preferably set to, for example, 0.5 mm or more, taking into consideration the influence of poor sheet holding. There is no particular upper limit to the thickness H, but it is set to, for example, 10 mm. Furthermore, in order to determine a defective state, it is preferable that the separation distance L of the spacer 4 is set to, for example, 1 mm or more.

[0029] [Preparation of test specimens for shear condition B (classification B)] As shown in Figure 4, the poor restraint condition of shearing condition B is when the surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 is not in contact with the metal sheet 10 in the shearing standby state, but the surface 1B of the lower die 1 is in contact with the metal sheet 10. The metal sheet 10 shown by the dashed dotted line is in the shearing standby state. The metal sheet 10A shown by the solid line is in the shearing state. The constrained state shown in Fig. 4 occurs in the actual production process of press-formed products, such as mass production, due to factors such as insufficient sheet clamp load. In other words, the constrained state shown in Fig. 4 simulates a state in which the sheet clamp 2 floats above the metal sheet 10 in the standby position. Fig. 4 also simulates a state in which the metal sheet 10 is sheared by the lower blade 1A and upper blade 3A from that state. In the constrained state shown in Fig. 4, the gap (opposing distance) between the surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 and the metal sheet 10 during shear standby can be a variable for the degree of defect corresponding to the floating of the sheet clamp 2.

[0030] Fig. 5 shows a schematic diagram of a shearing device for reproducing the shearing conditions under shearing condition B in shearing for preparing test specimens. In Fig. 5, metal plate 10 shown by the dashed line is in a shearing standby state, and metal plate 10A shown by the solid line is in a shearing state. The shearing device shown in FIG. 5 includes a lower die 1 having a lower blade 1A at its shoulder, an upper die 3 having an upper blade 3A at its shoulder, and a sheet clamp 2. The lower die 1 is, for example, a die, and the upper die 3 is, for example, a punch. The shearing device is configured so that surface 1B of the lower die 1 and surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 can restrain the metal sheet 10 during shearing. Then, with the sheet restrained, the upper blade 3A is moved relative to the lower blade 1A in the shearing direction, thereby shearing the metal sheet 10. At this time, the clearance ΔC between the upper blade 3A and the lower blade 1A is set to a preset value, and shearing is performed.

[0031] The shearing apparatus shown in Fig. 5 is a shearing apparatus for producing test pieces. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 5, surface 1B of lower die 1 and surface 2B of plate holder 2, which come into contact with flat metal plate 10, are flat surfaces. 5, in order to reproduce the state of shearing condition B, a spacer 4 having a thickness H greater than the thickness of the metal sheet 10 is inserted between the surface 2B of the sheet holder 2 and the surface 1B of the lower die 1. The spacer 4 is positioned so as not to come into contact with (interfere with) the metal sheet 10.

[0032] 5 is an apparatus that can simulate the degree to which the metal sheet 10 bounces up during shearing by adjusting the height H of the spacer 4. In other words, the thickness H of the spacer 4 is adjusted as a variable of the degree of defect, i.e., the degree to which the sheet holder 2 is raised. In shearing under shearing condition B, it is desirable that the thickness H of the spacer 4 be at least 0.2 mm thicker than the thickness of the metal plate 10, taking into account the influence of defects in the plate clamp 2. However, in order to evaluate the normal restraint state, it is also acceptable to include a case where the thickness H of the spacer 4 is equal to the thickness of the metal plate.

[0033] [Preparation of test specimens for shear condition C (classification C)] As shown in FIG. 6, the poor restraint condition of shearing condition C occurs when the surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 contacts the metal sheet 10, but the surface 1B of the lower die 1 does not contact the metal sheet 10 near the lower blade 1A. In FIG. 6, the symbol H′ indicates the gap between the surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the metal sheet 10 near the lower blade 1A. The symbol S in FIG. 6 also indicates the portions where the surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 contact the metal sheet 10 in the shearing standby state. In FIG. 6, the surfaces of the portions of the surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 that restrain the metal sheet 10 are not flat. The reason for this is as follows. That is, FIG. 6 simulates the state in which the metal sheet 10 is restrained after press forming. That is, Figure 6 is a schematic diagram showing that the surface 1B of the lower mold 1 and the surface 2B of the plate holder 2 are shaped to match the shape of the metal plate at the restraint position of the press-molded product that is restrained during shearing.

[0034] That is, the state shown in Fig. 6 is one in which the metal sheet 10 is firmly constrained by surface 1B of the lower die 1 and surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 in an actual production process such as mass production. However, Fig. 6 simulates the assumption that the part being constrained has a three-dimensional shape. Fig. 6 also simulates a state in which a gap exists between surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 and the metal sheet 10, or between surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the metal sheet 10. In other words, the state shown in Fig. 6 simulates a state in which the metal sheet 10 and surface 1B of the lower die 1 do not come into contact near the lower blade 1A during shear standby due to an error during forming or the like. In the state shown in Figure 6, the degree of defect can be determined by the distance L' between the contact portion S of the lower blade 1A and the contact portion S of the lower mold 1 at the contact portion S between the surface 1B of the lower mold 1 and the metal plate 10 when viewed in a plane, and the degree to which the surface 1B of the lower mold 1 is separated from the metal plate 10 near the contact portion S of the upper blade 3A.

[0035] Figure 7 shows a schematic diagram of the shearing device used to reproduce the shearing condition C in the shearing process used to prepare the test specimens. The shearing device shown in FIG. 7 includes a lower die 1 having a lower blade 1A at its shoulder, an upper die 3 having an upper blade 3A at its shoulder, and a sheet clamp 2. The lower die 1 is, for example, a die, and the upper die 3 is, for example, a punch. The shearing device is configured so that, during shearing, surface 1B of the lower die 1 and surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 can restrain the metal sheet 10 in the thickness direction. Then, with the metal sheet 10 restrained, the upper blade 3A is moved in the shearing direction relative to the lower blade 1A. This shears the metal sheet 10. At this time, the clearance ΔC between the upper blade 3A and the lower blade 1A is set to a preset value, and shearing is performed.

[0036] Here, the shearing apparatus shown in FIG. 7 is a shearing apparatus for producing test pieces. In the shearing process for producing the test piece, the metal plate 10 has a flat shape, so that the surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the surface 2B of the plate holder 2 shown in Fig. 7 are flat surfaces. In the shearing device shown in FIG. 7, a spacer 4 is inserted at least partially between the surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the metal plate 10 in order to reproduce the state of shearing condition C.

[0037] In this state, the distance L of the spacer 4 from the lower blade 1A and the thickness H of the spacer 4 are adjusted in plan view. This expresses how far the lower die 1 is away from the metal plate 10 near the contact point of the lower blade 1A. In other words, the distance L and the thickness H can be adjusted as variables for the degree of defect under shearing condition C. In the shearing process under shearing condition C, the thickness H of the spacer 4 is preferably 0.5 mm or more, taking into consideration the influence of defective sheet holding. Also, the separation distance L of the spacer 4 is preferably 1 mm or more, taking into consideration the influence of defective sheet holding. In the first step 50A, a plurality of test pieces are individually prepared for each of the shear conditions A, B, and C.

[0038] <Second step 50B> The second step 50B is a step of applying a preset external load stress to the shear end face of each of the various test specimens prepared in the first step 50A and restraining the test specimen in this loaded state. The stress application method is, for example, tensile stress application or bending stress application. In this case, a bending stress application method using a jig is particularly desirable from the viewpoint of simplicity. Any known method may be used for this load application method. For example, stress is applied to a test piece having a sheared end surface by four-point bending. The stress is preferably adjusted using a strain gauge attached to the metal plate 10 in advance. The load can also be substituted by a load due to axial tension. Here, it is preferable to change the applied stress in sufficiently small increments, such as in increments of 100 MPa, and prepare multiple test pieces for each variable (adjustment amount) of the shear condition.

[0039] <Third step 50C> In the third step 50C, the test specimen that has been subjected to an external load stress in the second step 50B and restrained in that state is placed in a predetermined hydrogen penetration environment for a predetermined time, and the occurrence of cracks in the test specimen in that state is evaluated in the third step 50C. In this case, the hydrogen penetration environment and installation time are preferably set to conditions that result in an amount of hydrogen penetration equivalent to the amount of hydrogen that is estimated to penetrate under the environment in which the material to be evaluated is actually used.

[0040] The test specimen is placed in a hydrogen penetration environment by immersing it in a bath containing an acid solution such as hydrochloric acid or an aqueous solution of NHSCN. The concentration of the acid solution and the immersion time are set so that the amount of hydrogen that is pre-set as the allowable upper limit is penetrated into the test specimen. Then, for each test piece prepared in the first step 50A and the second step 50B, the third step 50C to the fourth step 50D are repeatedly performed while changing the applied load stress conditions. In this way, by setting multiple load levels of the external load stress, it is possible to determine the limit value of the load stress at which delayed fracture does not occur for each variable of the shear condition. This limit value of the load stress is also referred to as the delayed fracture limit stress.

[0041] <Fourth step 50D> In the fourth step 50D, multiple combinations of the variables of the shear conditions in the first step 50A and the critical values ​​of the load stress at which delayed fracture does not occur (delayed fracture critical stress) determined in the third step 50C are obtained. The multiple combinations of data are obtained individually for each of the shear conditions A, B, and C. By referring to the multiple combinations of data, information on the correlation between the variables of the shear conditions and the corresponding limit values ​​of the load stress is obtained for each of the shear conditions A, B, and C.

[0042] The correlation information may be calculated using a known calculation method, such as a multiple regression model or a model formula based on machine learning. A plurality of combination data may also be used as the correlation information. In this way, by obtaining correlation information in advance, it is possible to predict whether delayed fracture will occur for each shear condition in an actual press-formed product or in the shape of a press-formed product to be formed.

[0043] Specifically, by referring to the correlation information, it is predicted whether delayed fracture will occur based on the shear conditions during trimming and the load stress applied after trimming. The load stress is, for example, the residual stress when the metal sheet 10 is press-formed after shearing. The load stress may be the load stress after trimming, which is the residual stress when the metal sheet 10 is press-formed plus the assembly stress of the press-formed parts. This load stress after trimming is also called the forming stress. Conversely, if the upper limit of the load stress after forming the sheared end face (after post-trim) is determined, it is possible to address this issue by determining the range of shear conditions that can be applied to post-trim.

[0044] As described above, it is advisable to determine the risk of delayed fracture in the rear trim section in advance and design the part shape and shearing conditions for the rear trim shearing process to prevent delayed fracture. In this case, it is possible to manufacture press-formed products with sheared edges that are excellent in delayed fracture resistance. In addition, when a single press-molded product has both a rear trim portion and a front trim portion, the front trim portion may be evaluated separately from the rear trim portion. Here, residual stresses in press-formed parts after trimming can be calculated by forming analysis using ordinary CAE. If the shear conditions are different at multiple points on the sheared edge, the occurrence of delayed fracture can be evaluated individually for each of those points or for a representative point, using the shear conditions at that point as a variable.

[0045] (Method of manufacturing press-molded products) When manufacturing a press-molded product having a shearing process (post-trim process) in which a press-molded part is sheared, it is preferable to manufacture the press-molded product as follows. That is, the delayed fracture property evaluation method of this embodiment determines shear conditions in the post-trim process under which the press-formed product is evaluated as not suffering from delayed fracture. Then, the press-formed product is manufactured by performing shear processing for the post-trim under the determined shear conditions.

[0046] Alternatively, the method for evaluating delayed fracture properties of this embodiment is used to determine limit values ​​(ranges) of variables of shear conditions that are permissible when manufacturing a target press-formed product, and then the variables of the shear conditions for shearing for post-trim are adjusted so that they are equal to or less than the determined limit values ​​(within the ranges). Here, when shearing (post-trim) is performed after press forming, the external load stress is, for example, residual stress caused by further press forming after the shearing for the post-trim, or assembly stress generated when the press-formed part is assembled to another structure.

[0047] (program) An example of a program used in the above-described delayed fracture property evaluation method will be shown below. In this example, the program stores information 40A relating to the correlation between variables of shearing conditions during shearing and the limit value of the external load stress that can be applied to the sheared end face (threshold stress for delayed fracture) in a storage unit 40 (see FIG. 8). The variables of the shearing conditions are the height H and the separation distance L of the spacer 4 for each shearing condition. In other words, the correlation information is calculated and stored separately for each of the shearing conditions A, B, and C. The correlation information 40A can be obtained by the processing of the delayed fracture property evaluation method described above. The program of this example is a program for executing a process of referring to the correlation information 40A and determining the limit value of the load stress that can be applied after shearing, which corresponds to the input variables of the shearing conditions during shearing.

[0048] Another example of the program is a program for causing a computer to execute a first processing step and a second processing step. The first processing step executes a process of obtaining a limit value of the load stress corresponding to the input variables of the shearing conditions during shearing by referring to the correlation information 40A. The second processing step executes a process of determining whether or not delayed fracture has occurred based on the forming stress, which is the load stress when press-forming the metal sheet 10 into the shape of the press-formed product, and the limit value of the load stress obtained in the first processing step.

[0049] Next, an example of processing by a program of the evaluation method described above will be explained with reference to Fig. 8. If evaluation is performed by processing as shown in Fig. 8, delayed fracture can be evaluated more efficiently. 8 includes a correlation information calculation unit 20, an evaluation main unit 30, and a storage unit 40. Programs for performing the processes of the correlation information calculation unit 20 and the evaluation main unit 30 are stored in the storage unit 40, such as a RAM or ROM, of a computer, and are executed by the computer.

[0050] <Storage section 40> The storage unit 40 is made up of a recording medium such as a database. The processing of the first step 50A to the fourth step 50D is repeated while variously changing the material conditions of the metal sheet 10, the hydrogen environment conditions, the shear conditions, and the amount of forming strain. As a result, data on the load stress d calculated for the variables of the shear conditions is stored in the memory unit 40, with the test conditions used as variables for each of the material conditions of the metal sheet 10, the hydrogen environment conditions, and the shear conditions during shearing. The memory unit 40 also stores information 40A on the calculated correlation. The information 40A on the correlation may be stored in the same medium as the program.

[0051] <Correlation information calculation unit 20> In step S10, the correlation information calculation unit 20 first prompts the operator to input the basic conditions for evaluation, such as the type of material (steel type and thickness H) and the hydrogen environment conditions (acidity and installation time), which are the conditions for delayed fracture. Thereafter, the correlation information calculation unit 20 acquires the above inputs through the operator's input operation. Next, in step S20, the operator is prompted to input variables of shearing conditions during shearing, and the input is acquired through input operations by the operator. The variables of the shearing conditions are, for example, the thickness H and the separation distance L of the spacer 4.

[0052] Next, in step S30, a data group of load stresses for each shear condition variable that matches the conditions input in steps S10 and S20 is obtained from the storage unit 40. The data group is a collection of data (shear condition variables, load stresses). This data group is collected individually for each of the shear conditions A, B, and C. Alternatively, the input of the data group of the load stress with respect to the variables of each shear condition obtained by the test is prompted, and the above input information is acquired by the input operation of the operator. The acquired data is stored in the storage unit 40.

[0053] Next, in step S40, referring to the data group of the load stress with respect to the variables of the shear condition obtained in step S30, a correlation detection process is performed based on a known processing method. Specifically, in step S40, an arithmetic process for obtaining the load stress d as a function f(x) with the variable x of the shear condition as a variable is executed. Next, in step S50, the function of the load stress d obtained in step S40 is changed to an expression considering the safety factor s (: 0 < s ≦ 1) as shown in the following formula. d = s·f(x) Then, the obtained information of the function of the load stress d (correlation information 40A) is stored in the storage unit 40 using the test conditions as a key.

[0054] <Evaluation main body part 30> In the evaluation main body part 30, first, in step S100, the input of the conditions of the material type (steel type and thickness H) of the evaluation target and the conditions of the hydrogen environment (acidity and installation time), which are the conditions of delayed fracture, is prompted. Then, by the input operation of the operator, the evaluation main body part 30 acquires the above input. Next, in step S110, the value of the variable x of the shear condition during shear processing and the input of the load stress g applied to the metal plate 10 after the formation of the shear end face are prompted. Then, by the input operation of the operator, the evaluation main body part 30 acquires the above input. These pieces of information may be acquired from the analysis information of the CAE analysis.

[0055] In step S120, the correlation information 40A consisting of the function "s·f(x)" of the load stress d that matches the conditions input in step S100 is acquired from the storage unit 40. Then, the limit value d of the load stress corresponding to the input value of the variable x of the shear condition is obtained. A process of outputting the limit value d of the load stress may be executed.

[0056] In step S130, the limit value d (= s·f(x)) of the load stress calculated in step S120 is compared with the load stress g applied to the metal sheet 10 after the sheared edge is formed. Then, based on this comparison, it is determined whether or not there is a risk of delayed fracture. The load stress g is, for example, a forming stress. Here, in step S130 in FIG. 8, it is determined whether or not there is a risk of delayed fracture, but the margin of load stress (=dg) up to delayed fracture may also be output.

[0057] In the above description, the correlation information calculation unit 20 calculates correlation information 40A, such as d=f(x) or d=s·f(x), for a variable x of the shear condition. Alternatively, correlation information 40A may be calculated as a variable x=h(d), for the limit shear condition, using the load stress d as a variable. In this case, in step S120, the correlation information 40A is referenced to calculate the limit value of the shear condition corresponding to the load stress d after the planned sheared edge formation. Then, in step S130, the value of the variable of the shear condition during shearing is compared with the calculated limit plastic strain x. Whether or not there is a risk of delayed fracture is determined based on this comparison.

[0058] (effect) In this embodiment, it is possible to set the critical stress for delayed fracture or to determine the occurrence of delayed fracture by taking into account the shear conditions in the rear trim of a press-formed product. As a result, in this embodiment, it is possible to improve the delayed fracture resistance when high-strength steel sheets are applied to various parts such as panel parts, structural and frame parts of automobiles.

[0059] (others) The present disclosure may also have the following configuration. (1) Disclosure 1 is a delayed fracture property evaluation method for evaluating the delayed fracture property of a sheared end surface of a metal plate made of a high-strength steel plate, Shearing the metal plate to prepare a metal plate test piece having the sheared end surface; The test piece was placed in a hydrogen penetration environment while a load stress was applied to the sheared end surface of the test piece. Evaluate the delayed fracture characteristics of the sheared end surface under the shearing conditions of the shearing process. Delayed fracture property evaluation method.

[0060] (2) Disclosure 2 is to prepare a plurality of test pieces under different shear conditions for the shear processing, The delayed fracture properties of the metal plate are evaluated for each shear condition. (3) Disclosure 3 determines the limit value of the load stress at the sheared end surface after shearing under the above shearing conditions, at which delayed fracture does not occur in a hydrogen penetration environment, Based on the limit value of the load stress thus determined, the delayed fracture properties of the sheared end surface are evaluated.

[0061] (4) Disclosure 4 is based on the delayed fracture property evaluation method of the present disclosure, and determines in advance the correlation between the shear condition and the limit value of the load stress, The correlation is used to evaluate the allowable load stress for the above shear conditions. (5) In disclosure 5, the shearing conditions are constraint conditions for the metal plate during the shearing process. (6) Disclosure 6 describes that the shearing process is performed by shearing the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by a lower mold having a lower blade at a shoulder portion and a plate holder, a spacer is inserted between the metal plate to be restrained and the plate holder; The shearing conditions are changed by changing at least one of the distance from the lower blade to the spacer and the thickness of the spacer.

[0062] (7) Disclosure 7 describes that the shearing process is performed by shearing the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by a lower mold having a lower blade at a shoulder portion and a plate holder, a spacer having a thickness greater than the thickness of the metal plate is inserted between the lower mold and the plate holder at a position where the spacer does not come into contact with the metal plate, thereby defining a facing distance between the lower mold and the plate holder that restrain the metal plate; By changing the thickness of the spacer, the shear conditions are changed.

[0063] (8) Disclosure 8 describes that the shearing process is performed by shearing the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by a lower mold having a lower blade at a shoulder portion and a plate holder, a spacer is inserted between the restrained metal plate and the lower die; The shearing conditions are changed by changing at least one of the distance from the lower blade to the spacer and the thickness of the spacer.

[0064] (9) Disclosure 9 is a prediction method for predicting whether or not delayed fracture will occur due to shearing in a press-formed product manufactured by press-forming a metal plate, the press-formed product being manufactured by a shearing process, Based on the delayed fracture property evaluation method of the present disclosure, a correlation between the shearing conditions of the shearing process and the limit value of the load stress is determined in advance; Using the correlation, it is possible to predict whether or not delayed fracture will occur in the press-formed product due to shear processing of the press part. Delayed fracture prediction method. (10) In disclosure 10, the shearing conditions are constraint conditions for the metal plate during the shearing process.

[0065] (11) Disclosure 11 is a method for evaluating delayed fracture properties, wherein information on the correlation between the shearing conditions of the shearing process and the limit value of the load stress, which is obtained based on the method for evaluating delayed fracture properties of the present disclosure, is stored in a storage unit; A program for causing a computer to execute a process for determining the limit value of the load stress that can be applied corresponding to the input shear conditions by referring to the stored correlation information.

[0066] (12) Disclosure 12 is a program for predicting whether or not delayed fracture will occur due to shearing in a press-formed product manufactured by press-forming a metal plate, the press-formed product being manufactured by a shearing process, information on the correlation between the shearing conditions of the shearing process and the limit value of the load stress, which is obtained based on the delayed fracture property evaluation method of the present disclosure, is stored in a storage unit; On the computer, a first processing step of determining a limit value of the load stress corresponding to the input shear condition by referring to the stored correlation information; a second processing step of determining whether or not delayed fracture has occurred based on a forming stress, which is a load stress applied to a sheared end surface formed by the shearing of the press part after the shearing, and the limit value of the load stress obtained in the first processing step; A program to execute. (13) In disclosure 13, the shearing conditions are constraint conditions for the metal plate during the shearing process.

[0067] (14) Disclosure 14 is a method for manufacturing a press-molded product, which is manufactured by performing a shearing process on a press part manufactured by press-molding a metal plate, Determine shear conditions under which the press-formed product is evaluated not to undergo delayed fracture by the delayed fracture property evaluation method of the present disclosure; The shearing process is carried out under the determined shearing conditions. Manufacturing method for press-molded products. (15) In disclosure 15, the shearing conditions are constraint conditions for the metal plate during the shearing process.

[0068] (16) Disclosure 16 is a shearing apparatus for shearing a metal plate to produce a test piece for evaluating delayed fracture properties, The cutting tool is configured to include a lower die having a lower blade on a shoulder portion, a plate holder, and an upper die having an upper blade on a shoulder portion, and to shear the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by the lower die and the plate holder, a spacer interposed between the metal plate and the plate holder; Shearing equipment.

[0069] (17) Disclosure 17 is a shearing apparatus for shearing a metal plate to produce a test piece for evaluating delayed fracture properties, The cutting tool is configured to include a lower die having a lower blade on a shoulder portion, a plate holder, and an upper die having an upper blade on a shoulder portion, and to shear the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by the lower die and the plate holder, a spacer is provided between the lower mold and the plate holder at a position where the spacer does not come into contact with the metal plate, and the thickness of the spacer is greater than the thickness of the metal plate; Shearing equipment.

[0070] (18) Disclosure 18 is a shearing apparatus for shearing a metal plate to produce a test piece for evaluating delayed fracture properties, The cutting tool is configured to include a lower die having a lower blade on a shoulder portion, a plate holder, and an upper die having an upper blade on a shoulder portion, and to shear the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by the lower die and the plate holder, a spacer interposed between the metal plate and the lower mold; Shearing equipment. [Example]

[0071] Next, an example based on this embodiment will be described. In this example, the metal plate to be evaluated is a test material A made of a 1.4 mm thick steel with a strength of 1470 MPa. However, the present invention is not limited to such a metal plate. The present invention can be suitably applied to metal materials, including ultra-high tensile strength steels with a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more, which are likely to experience delayed fracture at the shear edge.

[0072] In this example, a test piece with a length of 120 mm and a straight sheared edge was prepared for evaluation by shearing using the following die setup. The clearance between the upper blade 3A and the lower blade 1A during shearing was 12% of the thickness of the test piece. However, for comparison, normal shearing conditions were also performed without the spacer 4. The normal shearing conditions are conditions in which the lower die and the sheet clamp both restrain the metal sheet in surface contact.

[0073] (Preparation of test specimen for Example A) In order to reproduce the situation under shearing condition A, shearing was carried out using a shearing device in which a spacer 4 was inserted between the surface 2B of the plate holder 2 and the metal plate 10 as shown in FIG. In this state, the distance L of the spacer 4 from the lower blade 1A and the thickness H of the spacer 4 were adjusted as variables. The spacer 4 was made of a 590 MPa-class steel plate material. In this Example A, the height H of the spacer 4 was fixed at 2 mm. The distance L between the spacer 4 and the lower blade 1A was varied to 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm, which were variables under shearing condition A. In this way, test specimens for Example A were prepared.

[0074] (Preparation of test specimen for Example B) To reproduce the situation under shearing condition B, a device was used in which a spacer 4, whose thickness was greater than that of the metal sheet 10, was placed between surface 2B of the sheet holder 2 and surface 1B of the lower die 1, as shown in Figure 5. The spacer 4 was placed in a position where it did not come into contact with the metal sheet 10. Then, in the shearing standby state, the shearing process was carried out in a state where the metal sheet 10 did not come into contact with surface 2B of the sheet holder 2. In Example B, the thickness H of the spacer 4 was adjusted to adjust the shearing conditions. In Example B, the thickness H of the spacer 4 was adjusted to 1.9 mm, 2.4 mm, and 3.4 mm. This resulted in gaps of 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively, being formed between the metal plate 10 and the surface 2B of the plate holder 2.

[0075] (Preparation of test specimen for Example C) To reproduce the shearing condition C, shearing was performed using an apparatus in which a spacer 4 was inserted at least partially between the surface 1B of the lower die 1 and the metal plate 10, as shown in Fig. 7. In this state, the distance L of the spacer 4 from the lower blade 1A and the thickness H of the spacer 4 were adjusted. In Example C, the thickness H of the spacer 4 was set to 2 mm, and the distance L between the spacer 4 and the lower blade 1A was changed to 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm.

[0076] (Evaluation of the shear end surface of the test piece itself) The evaluation here was carried out by visually inspecting the shear surface. Under each condition of shear condition A, the sheared end surface was in a state almost identical to that under normal shear conditions, and the spacer 4 had almost no effect. Furthermore, under each condition of shearing condition B, the metal sheet 10 was released from the sheet clamp 2, and as a result, the metal sheet 10 was sheared while bouncing up toward the sheet clamp 2. As a result, the shear plane was not perpendicular to the sheet thickness but oblique. Furthermore, the sheared end surface was unstable, with secondary shear planes partially occurring in the elongation direction. This tendency was stronger as the height H of the spacer 4 increased.

[0077] Furthermore, under shear condition C, the metal sheet 10 was sheared while being subjected to bending deformation toward the lower die 1. As a result, the sheared end surface had an end surface property that was elongated toward the lower die 1. However, when the spacer 4 was 6 mm or more away, the metal sheet 10 underwent plastic deformation due to bending toward the lower die 1, and it was presumed that this was too severe a shear condition.

[0078] (Load application) Next, stress was applied to each of the prepared test pieces by four-point bending. The stress was measured using a strain gauge previously attached to the metal plate 10. The stress was then adjusted by multiplying the strain amount by Young's modulus of 205 GPa. Here, multiple test pieces were prepared under the same shear conditions, with the applied stress varied in 100 MPa increments.

[0079] (Installed in a hydrogen intrusion environment) Next, each loaded test piece was placed in a hydrogen penetration environment to check for the occurrence of delayed fracture. That is, the stressed test piece was immersed in hydrochloric acid of pH 3.5 for 96 hours, and if cracks were found on the shear edge after immersion, it was determined that delayed fracture had occurred. (Evaluation of delayed fracture properties) Here, under normal shear conditions without the spacer 4, the critical stress for delayed fracture was 1200 MPa, which was used as the evaluation standard.

[0080] [Example A] Table 1 shows the results of Example A when the height H of the spacer 4 is 2 mm.

[0081] [Table 1]

[0082] As can be seen from Table 1, when the height H of the spacer 4 is 2 mm and the distance L from the lower blade 1A is 0.5 mm, there is no difference from the normal shearing conditions without the spacer 4. However, when the distance L is 1 mm or more, the critical stress for delayed fracture tends to decrease.

[0083] Table 2 shows the results of Example A when the separation distance L of the spacer 4 is 6 mm.

[0084] [Table 2]

[0085] As can be seen from Table 2, when the separation distance L of the spacer 4 was 6 mm and the height H of the spacer 4 was 0.5 mm, there was no difference from the normal shear conditions without the spacer 4. However, when the height H of the spacer 4 was 1 mm or more, the critical stress for delayed fracture decreased.

[0086] [Example B] Table 3 shows the evaluation results of Example B. In Table 3, D is the gap between the surface 2B of the plate holder 2 and the metal plate 10.

[0087] [Table 3]

[0088] Table 3 shows the critical stress for delayed fracture when the height H of the spacer 4 is changed to 1.5 mm, 1.7 mm, 1.9 mm, 2.4 mm, and 3.4 mm. As can be seen from Table 3, the delayed fracture critical stress decreased when the height H was 1.7 mm or more. The larger the height H of the spacer 4, the lower the delayed fracture critical stress. In other words, the larger the gap between the metal plate 10 and the surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2, the lower the delayed fracture critical stress. In this example, the thickness of the test piece was 1.4 mm. Therefore, the gap between the surface 2B of the sheet clamp 2 and the metal plate 10 was calculated by subtracting 1.4 mm from the height H of the spacer 4.

[0089] [Example C] Table 4 shows the evaluation results of Example C. Table 4 shows an example in which the height H of the spacers 4 was kept constant (2 mm) and the separation distance L of the spacers 4 was changed.

[0090] [Table 4]

[0091] In Table 4, the height H of the spacer 4 is set to 2 mm, and the distance L of the spacer 4 from the lower blade 1A is changed to 0 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm. When the separation distance L = 0, the critical stress did not change because the spacer 4 itself functioned as the lower die 1. However, when the separation distance L was 0.5 mm or more, the delayed fracture critical stress decreased as the separation distance L increased.

[0092] Table 5 shows the results when the separation distance L of the spacer 4 is kept constant (2 mm) and the height H is changed.

[0093] [Table 5]

[0094] Table 5 shows the delayed fracture critical stress when the height H of the spacer 4 is changed, with the separation distance L set to 2 mm. As can be seen from Table 5, a decrease in the critical stress for delayed fracture was observed when the height H was 0.1 mm or more, and it was found that the critical stress for delayed fracture decreased as the height H increased.

[0095] [comprehensive evaluation] From the results of Tables 1 to 5 above, when considering the conditions under which delayed fracture does not occur with a maximum load stress of 1000 MPa as the standard, the following was found. In this example, it was found from the shearing condition A that the sheet holder 2 should be within 6 mm from the contact point of the lower blade 1A and the distance from the metal sheet 10 should be within 2 mm. Further, from the shearing condition B, it was found that the shearing should be performed under the condition that the lift of the plate holder 2 from the metal plate 10 is within 0.5 mm (that is, the height H of the spacer 4 is 1.9 mm or less). Furthermore, from the shearing condition C, it was found that shearing should be performed under the condition that the gap between the contact point of the lower blade 1A and the metal plate 10 and the surface 1B of the lower die 1 is within 2 mm and the distance from the metal plate 10 is within 2 mm.

[0096] Figure 9 shows an example of a rear trim part. In Figure 9, the position indicated by reference numeral 12 is the shear position. This part was sheared at the position indicated by the reference numeral 12. During shearing, shearing was carried out under the following conditions D and E. Under condition D, shearing was performed with a gap of 2 mm between surface 2B of sheet holder 2 and metal sheet 10. Under condition E, the gap between surface 2B of sheet holder 2 and metal sheet 10 was set to 0.5 mm or less, and the gap between metal sheet 10 and surface 1B of lower die 1 was also set to 1 mm or less, and shearing was performed in a state where they were in almost tight contact. Here, condition D corresponds to the case in Table 3 where the height H of the spacer 4 is 3.4 mm. Condition E corresponds to the situation where the height H of the spacer 4 in Table 3 is less than 1.9 mm in the areas where the metal plate 10 is not in contact with the upper and lower dies 1 and 3. Furthermore, even in the situation where the metal plate 10 is not in contact only with the lower die 1, the separation distance L in Table 4 is less than 1 mm. Therefore, it is considered that condition E satisfies the condition where delayed fracture does not occur based on the above-mentioned criterion of a maximum load stress of 1000 MPa.

[0097] However, in the post-trimming section, no strain is introduced after the sheared edge is generated. Therefore, the effect of stress relaxation at the sheared edge due to plastic strain can be ignored. Therefore, the delayed fracture threshold stresses shown in Tables 1, 2, and 3 can be applied to sheared sections as they are. On the other hand, when processing strain is applied after shearing, there is an effect of relaxation of shear residual stress due to plastic strain at the sheared edge. Therefore, depending on the amount of processing strain, the present invention may not necessarily be applicable.

[0098] Table 6 shows the residual stresses obtained by CAE analysis of representative locations A to J (not shown) in the rear trim portion of the part in Figure 9, and the delayed fracture test results under the above conditions, Condition D and Condition E, respectively.

[0099] [Table 6]

[0100] As can be seen from Table 6, there were some locations where delayed fracture occurred under condition D. On the other hand, under condition E, delayed fracture did not occur because shearing was performed under appropriate conditions using the delayed fracture evaluation method described above. In other words, under condition E, a press-formed product was obtained that had a rear trim edge surface with excellent delayed fracture resistance. This demonstrates the validity of the evaluation of delayed fracture properties based on the present invention.

[0101] The entire contents of Japanese Patent Application No. 2023-072154 (filed April 26, 2023), from which this application claims priority, are incorporated herein by reference. While the present invention has been described with reference to a limited number of embodiments, the scope of the invention is not limited thereto, and modifications of each embodiment based on the above disclosure would be obvious to those skilled in the art. [Explanation of symbols]

[0102] 1 Lower mold 1A lower blade 1B Surface that restrains the metal plate 2 Board holder 2B Surface that restrains the metal plate 3 Upper mold 3A upper blade 4 spacers 10 metal plate 20 Correlation information calculation unit 30 Evaluation Body 40 Storage section 40A Correlation Information 50A First Step 50B Second step 50C Third Process 50D Fourth step H Spacer thickness (height) L Spacer separation distance

Claims

1. A delayed fracture property evaluation method for evaluating the delayed fracture property of a sheared end surface of a metal plate made of a high-strength steel plate, comprising: Shearing the metal plate to prepare a metal plate test piece having the sheared end surface; The test piece was placed in a hydrogen penetration environment while a load stress was applied to the sheared end surface of the test piece. Evaluate the delayed fracture characteristics of the sheared end surface under the shearing conditions of the shearing process. Delayed fracture property evaluation method.

2. As the test piece, a plurality of test pieces are prepared under different shear conditions of the shear processing, Evaluate the delayed fracture properties of the above metal plates for each shear condition.

2. The delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 1.

3. The limit value of the applied stress at the sheared end surface after shearing under the above shearing conditions that does not cause delayed fracture in a hydrogen penetration environment is determined, Based on the obtained limit value of the load stress, the delayed fracture characteristics of the shear end surface are evaluated.

3. The delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 2.

4. a correlation between the shear condition and the limit value of the applied stress is determined in advance based on the delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 3; Using this correlation, the allowable load stress for the above shear conditions is evaluated. Delayed fracture property evaluation method.

5. The shearing conditions are constraint conditions for the metal plate during the shearing process. A delayed fracture property evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

6. The shearing process is performed by shearing the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by a lower mold having a lower blade at a shoulder portion and a plate holder, a spacer is inserted between the metal plate to be restrained and the plate holder; The shearing conditions are changed by changing at least one of the distance from the lower blade to the spacer and the thickness of the spacer.

6. A delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 5.

7. The shearing process is performed by shearing the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by a lower mold having a lower blade at a shoulder portion and a plate holder, a spacer having a thickness greater than the thickness of the metal plate is inserted between the lower mold and the plate holder at a position where the spacer does not come into contact with the metal plate, thereby defining a facing distance between the lower mold and the plate holder that restrain the metal plate; By changing the thickness of the spacer, the shear conditions are changed.

6. A delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 5.

8. The shearing process is performed by shearing the metal plate with the lower blade and the upper blade while the metal plate is restrained by a lower mold having a lower blade at a shoulder portion and a plate holder, a spacer is inserted between the restrained metal plate and the lower die; The shearing conditions are changed by changing at least one of the distance from the lower blade to the spacer and the thickness of the spacer.

6. A delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 5.

9. A method for predicting whether or not delayed fracture will occur due to shearing in a press-formed product manufactured by press-forming a metal plate, the method comprising: a correlation between the shearing conditions of the shearing process and the limit value of the load stress is determined in advance based on the delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 3; Using the correlation, it is possible to predict whether or not delayed fracture will occur in the press-formed product due to shear processing of the press part. Delayed fracture prediction method.

10. The shearing conditions are constraint conditions for the metal plate during the shearing process. The delayed fracture prediction method according to claim 9.

11. information on the correlation between the shearing conditions of the shearing process and the limit value of the load stress, which is obtained based on the delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 3, is stored in a storage unit; A program for causing a computer to execute a process for determining the limit value of the load stress that can be applied corresponding to the input shear conditions by referring to the stored correlation information.

12. A program for predicting whether or not delayed fracture will occur due to shearing in a press-formed product manufactured by press-forming a metal plate, the press-formed product being manufactured by a shearing process, information on the correlation between the shearing conditions of the shearing process and the limit value of the load stress, which is obtained based on the delayed fracture property evaluation method according to claim 3, is stored in a storage unit; On the computer, a first processing step of determining a limit value of the load stress corresponding to the input shear condition by referring to the stored correlation information; a second processing step of determining whether or not delayed fracture has occurred based on a forming stress, which is a load stress applied to a sheared end surface formed by the shearing of the press part after the shearing, and the limit value of the load stress obtained in the first processing step; A program to execute.

13. The shearing conditions are constraint conditions for the metal plate during the shearing process.

13. The program according to claim 11 or 12.

14. A method for manufacturing a press-molded product, which includes a step of shearing a press part manufactured by press-molding a metal plate, determining shear conditions under which the press-formed product is evaluated as not undergoing delayed fracture by the delayed fracture property evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 4; The shearing process is carried out under the determined shearing conditions. Manufacturing method for press-molded products.

15. The shearing conditions are constraint conditions for the metal plate during the shearing process. A method for producing a press-molded product according to claim 14.

Images