Topological data verification evaluation method and apparatus for substation, and computer device and medium

Abstract

The present application relates to a topological data verification evaluation method and apparatus for a substation, and a computer device and a medium. The method comprises: according to substation data of each substation in a target area, determining a topological network relationship between device elements in each substation; according to the topological network relationship between the device elements in each substation, determining evaluation sub-values corresponding to selectable voltage levels of each substation under preset device element verification indicators; and according to the evaluation sub-values, first-level weights corresponding to the evaluation sub-values, second-level weights corresponding to the preset device element verification indicators, and third-level weights corresponding to the selectable voltage levels of each substation, determining a topological data verification evaluation value of each substation. By using the method, a topological data verification evaluation value of each substation can be accurately obtained according to a constructed connection relationship between the substations and a connection relationship between device elements, and the evaluation efficiency for the substations is also improved.

Description

Substation topology data verification and evaluation method, device, computer equipment and medium Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of computer technology, and in particular to a method, device, computer equipment and medium for verifying and evaluating substation topology data. Background Art

[0002] With the development of computer technology, the storage of substation data in substations has changed from paper records to computer storage. In the existing technology, when there is a need to verify and evaluate substation topology data, users usually need to first retrieve the substation data from the computer memory and then manually verify the substation data.

[0003] Although this method can complete the verification of substation data, since this method can only view the called substation data, there is no connection relationship between equipment components. Therefore, it is impossible for humans to accurately judge the correctness of the connection relationship between each equipment component in the substation data. There are problems such as inaccurate substation topology data verification evaluation and low evaluation efficiency.

[0004] Summary of the Invention

[0005] Based on this, it is necessary to provide a substation verification and evaluation method, device, computer equipment and storage medium that can improve the accuracy and efficiency of substation topology data verification and evaluation to address the above technical problems.

[0006] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for verifying and evaluating substation topology data. The method comprises:

[0007] Determine the topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0008] According to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined;

[0009] The topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0010] In one embodiment, determining the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the selectable voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation includes:

[0011] For each optional voltage level of each substation, determine the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification index for the optional voltage level;

[0012] Determine the number of equipment components to be counted based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation;

[0013] According to the number of equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined.

[0014] In one embodiment, if the selectable voltage level is 500kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the selectable voltage level under the preset equipment component verification index include: isolated component management rate, knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy, and circuit isolation knife switch quantity accuracy;

[0015] If the optional voltage level is 220kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators for the optional voltage level include: isolated component management rate, line switch group name and code accuracy rate, transformer switch group name and code accuracy rate, circuit breaker quantity accuracy rate, and circuit isolation switch quantity accuracy rate;

[0016] If the optional voltage level is 35kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy, reactor switch group name and coding accuracy and busbar quantity accuracy.

[0017] In one embodiment, a topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the primary weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the secondary weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the tertiary weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation, including:

[0018] According to the first-level weight corresponding to each sub-evaluation indicator, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator are weighted and summed to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator;

[0019] According to the secondary weights corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicators are weighted summed to obtain the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation;

[0020] According to the three-level weights corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage level of each substation are weighted summed to obtain the verification score value of each substation.

[0021] In one embodiment, the preset equipment component verification indicators include: an isolated component verification indicator, an equipment name and number verification indicator, and an equipment quantitative relationship verification indicator.

[0022] In one embodiment, the method further comprises:

[0023] Obtain the original data of each substation in the target area;

[0024] Determine the identification method of the original data according to the data format of the original data;

[0025] According to the identification method, the substation data of each substation is identified from the original data.

[0026] In one embodiment, after determining the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation, the method further includes:

[0027] Determine the topological network model between substations based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0028] Verify the evaluation value based on the topological data of each substation and determine the evaluation level of each substation;

[0029] The topology network model is updated according to the display mode corresponding to the evaluation level of each substation, and the updated topology network model is displayed.

[0030] In a second aspect, the present application also provides a substation topology data verification and evaluation device. The device includes:

[0031] a relationship determination module for determining the topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0032] A sub-value determination module is used to determine the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation;

[0033] The verification determination module is used to determine the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0034] In a third aspect, the present application further provides a computer device. The computer device includes a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are performed:

[0035] Determine the topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0036] According to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined;

[0037] The topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0038] In a fourth aspect, the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

[0039] Determine the topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0040] According to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined;

[0041] The topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0042] In a fifth aspect, the present application further provides a computer program product. The computer program product includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

[0043] Determine the topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0044] According to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined;

[0045] The topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0046] The above-mentioned substation topology data verification and evaluation method, device, computer equipment and storage medium determine the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level in the substation under the preset equipment component verification index based on the determined topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, and finally further determine the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation based on the sub-evaluation value under each verification index. This method constructs the topological network relationship between the substations and the topological network relationship between the equipment components, and can visualize the connection relationship between the substations and the connection relationship between the equipment components. Based on the constructed connection relationship (that is, the connection relationship between the substations and the connection relationship between the equipment components), the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation can be more accurately determined. At the same time, compared with the existing technology, the present application no longer relies on manual evaluation, and can accurately obtain the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation based on the constructed connection relationship between the substations and the connection relationship between the equipment components, further improving the evaluation efficiency of the substation. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0047] FIG1 is an application environment diagram of a substation topology data verification and evaluation method provided by this embodiment;

[0048] FIG2 is a schematic flow chart of a first substation topology data verification and evaluation method provided by this embodiment;

[0049] FIG3 is a schematic diagram of a process for determining a sub-evaluation value provided by this embodiment;

[0050] FIG4 is a schematic diagram of an indicator gap scoring method provided by this embodiment;

[0051] FIG5 is a schematic diagram of a hierarchical evaluation method provided by this embodiment;

[0052] 6a-6b are schematic flow charts of a second substation topology data verification and evaluation method provided in this embodiment;

[0053] FIG7 is a structural block diagram of a first substation topology data verification and evaluation device provided by this embodiment;

[0054] FIG8 is a structural block diagram of a second substation topology data verification and evaluation device provided by this embodiment;

[0055] FIG9 is a structural block diagram of a third substation topology data verification and evaluation device provided in this embodiment;

[0056] FIG10 is a structural block diagram of a fourth substation topology data verification and evaluation device provided in this embodiment;

[0057] FIG11 is a structural block diagram of a fifth substation topology data verification and evaluation device provided in this embodiment;

[0058] FIG12 is a diagram showing the internal structure of a computer device provided in this embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0059] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of this application more clear, the following further describes this application in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain this application and are not intended to limit this application.

[0060] The substation topology data verification and evaluation method provided in an embodiment of the present application can be applied to the application environment shown in Figure 1. In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which can be a server, and its internal structure diagram can be shown in Figure 1. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, and a network interface connected via a system bus. Among them, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program, and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The database of the computer device is used to store substation data. The network interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal through a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a substation topology data verification and evaluation method is implemented.

[0061] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG2 , a method for verifying and evaluating substation topology data is provided. The method is described by applying it to the server in FIG1 as an example, including the following steps:

[0062] S201 , determining a topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on substation data of each substation in a target area.

[0063] The target area may be an area where verification and evaluation of the substation is required.

[0064] Substation data may include substation attribute information and attribute information of equipment components within the substation. Optionally, substation data may include substation attribute data and equipment data. Attribute data may include substation ID number, substation name, substation description, substation address, substation associations, substation feeder array, load forecast data, and load history data. Equipment data may include equipment ID number, equipment name, associated line, equipment type (e.g., switch, circuit breaker, transformer, etc.), equipment location, equipment associations, voltage level identifier, physical connection node number, and power limit.

[0065] Optionally, in this embodiment, the substation data may be represented by a substation attribute data definition table (ie, Table 1) and a substation equipment data definition table (ie, Table 2).

[0066] Table 1 Substation attribute data definition table

[0067] The topological network relationships between equipment components within a substation can be network relationships that characterize the connectivity between the various equipment components within the substation. Optionally, each substation corresponds to a topological network relationship between equipment components within the substation. Equipment components can be components required to support substation operation. Optionally, equipment components can be components that constitute the optional voltage levels included in the substation. For example, equipment components that constitute the 35kV optional voltage level may include: circuit breakers, disconnect switches, line switch groups, transformer switch groups, capacitor switch groups, reactor switch groups, busbars, line-end equipment, etc.

[0068] Table 2 Substation equipment data definition table

[0069] Optionally, for each substation, the equipment data corresponding to the substation is determined from the substation data of the substation, and the arrangement position of each equipment component node is determined based on the equipment position of each equipment recorded in the equipment data. At the same time, based on the equipment data, the two equipment components with a connection relationship are determined, and based on the connection relationship between the two equipment components, the two equipment component nodes are connected to form a topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation.

[0070] Optionally, the method for obtaining the substation data of each substation in the target area can be to directly receive the substation data input by the user, or to obtain the original data of each substation in the target area; determine the identification method of the original data according to the data format of the original data; and identify the substation data of each substation from the original data according to the identification method.

[0071] The data format may be the format in which the original data is stored in the local device. Optionally, the data format may indicate whether the original data can be directly read and recorded in the local device. The data may include but is not limited to Excel format, XML format, CIM / E format, and JSON format.

[0072] Specifically, the original data of each substation in the target area input by the user is obtained, the data format of the original data is identified, and it is determined whether the data format of the original data is a preset recognizable data format (such as Excel format, XML format, CIM / E format and JSON format, etc.). If so, the original data is directly identified according to the data format corresponding to the original data, and the original data is automatically loaded into the local device, and the substation data of each substation is further identified from the loaded original data; otherwise, it is proved that the data format of the original data cannot be directly identified, and manual input can be used to manually input the original data into the local device, or a third-party data interface or protocol (such as a database access interface, a communication protocol method, an API interface method, etc.) can be called to identify the data format corresponding to the data of the original data through the protocol or interface, and the identified original data is loaded into the local device, and the substation data of each substation is further identified from the loaded original data.

[0073] It should be noted that, in this embodiment, if the format of the original data is a preset recognizable data format (such as Excel format, XML format, CIM / E format and JSON format, etc.), then the original data at this time is the substation data of each substation. If the format of the original data is not a preset recognizable data format, then the original data at this time is data with the same content as the substation data but a different format.

[0074] S202: Determine, based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index.

[0075] Among them, the optional voltage levels are all voltage levels included in the substation, and the number of optional voltage levels is two or three. For example, a 500kV substation includes three voltage levels, namely 500kV voltage level, 220kV voltage level and 35kV voltage level. The equipment component verification index can be an index used to verify the optional voltage level based on the equipment component data of the optional voltage level. Optionally, the preset equipment component verification indicators corresponding to each optional voltage level can be the same. For example, the equipment component verification indicators can include isolated original component verification, equipment name and number verification, and equipment quantitative relationship verification. The sub-evaluation value can be one or more evaluation values ​​used to measure the equipment component verification index based on the equipment component data of the optional voltage level.

[0076] Optionally, for each substation in the target area, based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation corresponding to the substation, the index value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index (such as the isolated component management rate, the accuracy of the equipment component name and number, the accuracy of the equipment component quantity, etc.) is determined, and the index value is used as the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification index.

[0077] Optionally, since the numerical ranges of the corresponding indicator values ​​under different equipment component verification indicators are different, in order to ensure the accuracy of the substation topology data verification evaluation value, the different indicator values ​​can be quantized into a unified numerical range to determine the corresponding sub-evaluation values. Specifically, based on the determined indicator value, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the indicator value is found in the indicator gap scoring diagram (such as Figure 3).

[0078] Exemplarily, a schematic diagram of the indicator gap score is shown in FIG3 , wherein the horizontal axis in the figure represents the indicator value corresponding to the equipment component verification indicator, the vertical axis represents the sub-evaluation value, m represents the target value (usually 100%), and j represents the benchmark value (usually 0).

[0079] S203, determining the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0080] The topology data verification evaluation value may be an evaluation result obtained by verifying the substation (eg, determining whether the internal equipment components of the substation are complete and whether the connections between the equipment components are correct).

[0081] Optionally, for each substation, the method for determining the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation according to the sub-evaluation value of the substation, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation can be, based on the obtained sub-evaluation value, the sub-evaluation value and the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation are input into the pre-selected and trained verification model. The verification model will perform analysis and calculation based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight, the second-level weight and the third-level weight, so as to obtain the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation.

[0082] Optionally, according to the first-level weight corresponding to each sub-evaluation indicator, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator are weighted and summed to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator; according to the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicator, the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator is weighted and summed to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation; according to the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation, the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation is weighted and summed to obtain the verification score value of each substation.

[0083] Specifically, for each substation, a weighted summation process is performed according to the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation index of the substation and the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under the preset equipment component verification index, so as to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of the substation under the preset equipment component verification index; a weighted summation process is performed according to the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index and the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index, so as to calculate the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of the substation; a weighted summation process is performed according to the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation and the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of the substation to obtain the verification score value of the substation.

[0084] It should be noted that after determining the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation, this embodiment can also determine the quality of the substation based on the topology data verification evaluation value of the substation, and display the quality in the topology network relationship. Therefore, this embodiment determines the topology network model between each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area; determines the evaluation level of each substation based on the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation; updates the topology network model according to the display method corresponding to the evaluation level of each substation, and displays the updated topology network model.

[0085] The evaluation level may be a level used to evaluate the quality of the substation.

[0086] Optionally, based on the substation data of each substation in the target area obtained, the substation address of each substation is determined from the attribute data of each substation data, and the arrangement position of each substation node is determined based on the substation address of each substation. At the same time, based on the substation data, two substations with a power transmission relationship are determined, and based on the power transmission relationship between the two substations, the two substation nodes are connected to form a topological network model between the substations; based on the topological data verification evaluation value of each substation, the evaluation level corresponding to the verification evaluation interval to which each topological data verification evaluation value belongs is determined; for the evaluation level corresponding to each substation, the display mode corresponding to the corresponding substation node of the substation in the topological network model is updated according to the display mode corresponding to the evaluation level, and the topological network model after the display mode of all substations is updated is displayed to the user. For example, when the evaluation level is excellent (i.e., the topology data verification evaluation value is full marks), the display mode corresponding to the substation can be adjusted to green, that is, the node represented by the substation in the topology network model is adjusted to green; when the evaluation level is qualified (i.e., the topology data verification evaluation value is higher than 90 points but lower than 100 points), the display mode corresponding to the substation can be adjusted to yellow, that is, the node represented by the substation in the topology network model is adjusted to yellow; when the evaluation level is unqualified (i.e., the topology data verification evaluation value is lower than 90 points), the display mode corresponding to the substation can be adjusted to red, that is, the node represented by the substation in the topology network model is adjusted to red.

[0087] It should be noted that, because relational databases implement references between multiple tables through foreign key constraints, they perform poorly in processing data with complex relationships. Furthermore, because substation data contains complex connections (i.e., between equipment components within each substation, and between substations within the target area), relational databases are not suitable for storing substation data. Therefore, when storing substation data, non-relational databases (such as graph databases) are typically used. Specifically, the topological network relationships between equipment components within each substation, as well as the topological network models between substations, constructed based on the substation data, are stored in non-relational databases (such as graph databases).

[0088] The above-mentioned substation topology data verification and evaluation method, device, computer equipment and storage medium determine the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level in the substation under the preset equipment component verification index based on the determined topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, and finally further determine the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation based on the sub-evaluation value under each verification index. This method constructs the topological network relationship between the substations and the topological network relationship between the equipment components, and can visualize the connection relationship between the substations and the connection relationship between the equipment components. Based on the constructed connection relationship (that is, the connection relationship between the substations and the connection relationship between the equipment components), the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation can be more accurately determined. At the same time, compared with the existing technology, the present application no longer relies on manual evaluation, and can accurately obtain the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation based on the constructed connection relationship between the substations and the connection relationship between the equipment components, further improving the evaluation efficiency of the substation.

[0089] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of a process for determining sub-evaluation values ​​in one embodiment. To ensure the accuracy of the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the equipment component calibration indicators, the quantity values ​​of the equipment components are introduced on the basis of the above embodiment. Based on the quantity values, the sub-evaluation values ​​under the equipment component calibration indicators can be determined more reasonably and accurately. Specifically, this embodiment provides an optional method for determining sub-evaluation values, including the following steps:

[0090] S401 , for each optional voltage level of each substation, determining the equipment components to be counted under a preset equipment component verification index for the optional voltage level.

[0091] Optionally, for each optional voltage level of each substation, the equipment components required under the preset equipment component verification index are determined from all equipment components corresponding to the optional voltage level as the equipment components to be counted.

[0092] For example, as shown in Figure 5, a schematic diagram of a hierarchical evaluation is shown. The first column of boxes in the figure represents the 500kV substation topology data verification evaluation value, that is, the topology data verification evaluation value of a substation. The second column of boxes in the figure represents the optional voltage levels, including the 500kV voltage level, the 220kV voltage level, and the 35kV voltage level. The third column of boxes in the figure represents the equipment component verification indicators for each optional voltage level. The last column of boxes in the figure represents the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators. As can be seen from Figure 5, the sub-evaluation values ​​in the figure are different, and the optional voltage levels corresponding to the sub-evaluation values ​​are also different. Therefore, the equipment components to be counted corresponding to each optional voltage level are also different. Specifically, for a 500kV substation, the substation includes three voltage levels: 500kV voltage level, 220kV voltage level, and 35kV voltage level. For the 500kV voltage level, in order to calculate the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators of the 500kV voltage level: isolated component management rate, knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy and circuit isolation knife switch quantity accuracy, therefore, the isolated components in the 500kV voltage level (that is, independent equipment components that are not connected to any lines or equipment), line-end equipment, circuit breakers and circuit isolation switches should be selected as the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification indicators of the 500kV voltage level.

[0093] For the 220kV voltage level, in order to calculate the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to this voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators: isolated component management rate, line switch group name and coding accuracy, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy and circuit isolation switch quantity accuracy, therefore, the equipment components to be counted corresponding to the 220kV voltage level should be selected, including isolated components, line switch groups, transformer switch groups, line-end equipment, circuit breakers and circuit isolation switches in this voltage level as the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification indicators for this 220kV voltage level.

[0094] For the 35kV voltage level, in order to calculate the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to this voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators: isolated component management rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy rate, capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy rate, reactor switch group name and coding accuracy rate and busbar quantity accuracy rate, therefore, the equipment components to be counted corresponding to the 35kV voltage level should be selected, including the isolated components, transformer switch group, capacitor switch group, reactor switch group and busbar in this voltage level as the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification indicators for the 35kV voltage level.

[0095] S402: Determine the number of equipment components to be counted based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation.

[0096] The quantity value of the equipment components to be counted can represent the total number of equipment components to be counted, or the number of erroneous equipment components to be counted. Specifically, for equipment components such as isolated components, the corresponding quantity value is the total number of the equipment components. For equipment components such as busbars, circuit breakers, and circuit isolating switches, the corresponding quantity value is the number of erroneous equipment components in the equipment components. It should be noted that for the equipment component switch group, it is necessary to know both the total number of the equipment component switch groups and the number of erroneous equipment component switch groups with erroneous names and codes in the equipment component switch groups, so as to subsequently determine the accuracy of the equipment component switch group name and code based on the total number and the erroneous number.

[0097] Optionally, for each substation, based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation, the total number of each equipment component to be counted in the substation is first determined. For some equipment components to be counted (such as isolated components and equipment component switch groups, etc.), the total number of the equipment components to be counted can be directly used as the number value of the equipment components to be counted; for some equipment components to be counted (such as equipment component switch groups, busbars, circuit breakers, and circuit isolating switches, etc.), it is necessary to further determine the number of errors corresponding to the equipment components to be counted based on the determined total number of each equipment component to be counted, and use this error number as the number value of the equipment components to be counted; for the equipment component switch group, the total number of equipment component switch groups counted and the error number of equipment component switch groups with errors in names and / or codes need to be used as the number value of the equipment component switch group. It should be noted that for different types of equipment components to be counted, the method of determining the number of errors corresponding to the equipment components to be counted based on the total number of each equipment component to be counted is different, and the specific implementation method will be described in detail in subsequent embodiments.

[0098] For example, as shown in Figure 5, for the 500kV optional voltage level, in order to calculate the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators (i.e., the isolated component management rate, the knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, the circuit breaker number accuracy and the circuit isolation knife switch number accuracy), it is necessary to count the number of equipment components to be counted corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level, including: the total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components, the number of knife switch component switch group name and coding errors, the total number of knife switch component switch groups, the number of circuit breaker errors and the number of circuit isolation knife switch errors.

[0099] Among them, the total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components and the total number of switch groups of knife switch components can all be directly counted based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components.

[0100] Among them, the method for determining the number of errors in the name and code of the knife switch component switch group can be, based on the name and code between the circuit breaker and the isolating knife switches on both sides of the circuit breaker in the optional voltage level, determining whether the name of the circuit breaker and the isolating knife switches on both sides of the circuit breaker are the same as the preset name, and whether the code of the circuit breaker and the code of the isolating knife switches on both sides of the circuit breaker are also the same; if the name of the circuit breaker and the isolating knife switches on both sides of the circuit breaker are the same as the preset name, and the code of the circuit breaker and the code of the isolating knife switches on both sides of the circuit breaker are also the same, then it is considered that there are no problems with the name and code of the knife switch component switch group; otherwise, if the name of the circuit breaker and the isolating knife switches on both sides of the circuit breaker are different from the preset name, and / or the code of the circuit breaker and the code of the isolating knife switches on both sides of the circuit breaker are different, then it is determined that there are problems with the name and code of the knife switch component switch group, and the number of all problematic knife switch component switch group names and codes is counted as the number of errors in the name and code of the knife switch component switch group.

[0101] Among them, the method for determining the number of circuit breaker errors can be, based on the total number of optional voltage levels, the total number of circuit breakers and the total number of line-end devices obtained, taking the sum of the total number of optional voltage levels and the total number of line-end devices as the number of circuits, taking the ratio between the total number of circuit breakers and the number of circuits as the first ratio, determining whether the first ratio meets the preset first ratio threshold, if so, it is considered that the circuit breaker of the optional voltage level has no problem, otherwise, it is considered that the circuit breaker of the optional voltage level has a problem. The substations with problems in the circuit breaker are counted as the number of circuit breaker errors. Similarly, when the second ratio between the counted number of circuit isolation switches and the number of circuits does not meet the second ratio threshold, it is considered that there is a problem with the circuit isolation switch of the optional voltage level, and the number of substations with problems in the circuit isolation switches is counted as the number of circuit isolation switch errors.

[0102] For the 220kV optional voltage level, in order to calculate the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the 220kV optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators (i.e., the isolated component management rate, the line switch group name and coding accuracy rate, the transformer switch group name and coding accuracy rate, the circuit breaker quantity accuracy rate and the circuit isolation switch quantity accuracy rate), it is necessary to count the number values ​​of the equipment components to be counted corresponding to the 220kV optional voltage level, including: the total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components, the number of transformer switch group name and coding errors, the total number of transformer switch groups, the number of line switch group name and coding errors, the total number of line switch groups, the number of circuit breaker errors and the number of circuit isolation switch errors.

[0103] The total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components, the total number of transformer switch groups, and the total number of line switch groups can all be directly calculated based on the topological network relationships between the equipment components. The method for determining the number of circuit breaker errors and circuit isolation switch errors is the same as the method for determining the number of circuit breaker errors and circuit isolation switch errors in the 500kV optional voltage level, and is not further described in this application.

[0104] Among them, the method for determining the number of transformer switch group name and code errors can be, based on each transformer switch group, determining whether the name and code of the transformer switch group are the same as the standard name and code corresponding to the transformer switch group. If the name and code of the transformer switch group are the same as the standard name and code corresponding to the transformer switch group, then the name and code of the transformer switch group are considered correct; if the name of the transformer switch group is different from the standard name, and / or the code of the transformer switch group is different from the standard code, then the name and / or code of the transformer switch group is considered to be wrong, and the number of transformer switch groups with problems in the names and / or codes of all transformer switch groups is counted as the number of transformer switch group name and code errors. Similarly, the method for counting the number of line switch group name and code errors is similar to the method for counting the number of transformer switch group name and code errors, and this application will not elaborate on this.

[0105] For the 35kV optional voltage level, in order to calculate the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the 35kV optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators (i.e., the isolated component management rate, the transformer switch group name and coding accuracy rate, the capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy rate, the reactor switch group name and coding accuracy rate, and the bus number accuracy rate), it is necessary to count the number of equipment components to be counted corresponding to the 35kV optional voltage level, including: the total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components, the number of transformer switch group name and coding errors, the total number of transformer switch groups, the number of capacitor switch group name and coding errors, the total number of capacitor switch groups, the number of reactor switch group name and coding errors, the total number of reactor switch groups, the number of bus errors, and the total number of optional voltage levels.

[0106] The total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components, the total number of transformer switch groups, the total number of capacitor switch groups, the total number of reactor switch groups, and the total number of selectable voltage levels can all be directly calculated based on the topological network relationships between the equipment components. The method for determining the number of transformer switch group name and coding errors, the number of capacitor switch group name and coding errors, and the number of reactor switch group name and coding errors is similar to the method for determining the number of transformer switch group name and coding errors for the 220kV selectable voltage level, and is not further described in this application.

[0107] Among them, the method for determining the number of bus errors can be to calculate the difference between the total number of bus bars and the total number of optional voltage levels based on the acquired total number of bus bars and the total number of optional voltage levels, and use the difference as the number of bus errors.

[0108] S403: Determine, based on the number of equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area, a sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under a preset equipment component verification index.

[0109] Optionally, based on the number of equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area, the corresponding proportion value of the optional voltage level of the substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined. In this embodiment, the proportion value can be directly used as the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification index; the score value corresponding to the proportion interval to which the proportion value belongs can also be determined, and the score value can be used as the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index; the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index corresponding to the proportion value can also be determined through the indicator gap scoring formula.

[0110] For example, the indicator gap scoring formula can be shown as the following formula (1-1):

[0111] Wherein, f(x) represents the sub-evaluation value, x represents the percentage value, j represents the reference value (usually 0), and m represents the target value (usually 100%).

[0112] For example, if the optional voltage level is 500kV voltage level, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy and circuit isolation knife switch quantity accuracy.

[0113] Optionally, the number of equipment components to be counted corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level determined is: the total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components, the number of incorrect switch group names and codes for switch components, the total number of switch groups for switch components, the number of circuit breaker errors, and the number of circuit isolation switch errors. Therefore, the sub-evaluation value for the isolated component control rate can be determined by calculating the isolated component ratio between the number of isolated components and the total number of equipment components, and using the difference between a preset value (e.g., 100%) and the isolated ratio as the sub-evaluation value for the isolated component control rate. The sub-evaluation value for the circuit breaker quantity accuracy rate can be determined by determining the circuit breaker ratio between the number of circuit breaker errors and the number of substations in the target area, and using the difference between the preset value and the circuit breaker ratio as the sub-evaluation value for the circuit breaker quantity accuracy rate. The sub-evaluation value for the accuracy of the number of circuit isolation switches can be determined by determining the ratio of isolation switches to the number of substations in the target area, and using the difference between the preset value and the ratio as the sub-evaluation value for the accuracy of the number of circuit isolation switches. The sub-evaluation value for the accuracy of the names and codes of switch groups of switch components can be determined by using the ratio of the number of correct names and codes of switch groups of switch components to the total number of switch groups of switch components as the sub-evaluation value for the accuracy of the names and codes of switch groups of switch components.

[0114] If the optional voltage level is 220kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, line switch group name and coding accuracy, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy and circuit isolation switch quantity accuracy.

[0115] Optionally, the number of equipment components to be counted corresponding to the 220kV optional voltage level is determined to be: the total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components, the number of line switch group name and coding errors, the number of transformer switch group name and coding errors, the number of circuit breaker errors, and the number of circuit isolation knife switch errors. Since the method for determining the isolated component control rate is the same as the method for determining the isolated component control rate corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level mentioned above; the method for determining the accuracy of the number of circuit breakers is the same as the method for determining the accuracy of the number of circuit breakers corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level mentioned above; the method for determining the accuracy of the number of circuit isolation knife switches is the same as the method for determining the accuracy of the number of circuit isolation knife switches corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level mentioned above; the method for determining the accuracy of the line switch group name and coding, as well as the method for determining the accuracy of the transformer switch group name and coding, is the same as the method for determining the accuracy of the knife switch element switch group name and coding corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level mentioned above, this embodiment will not be described in detail here.

[0116] If the optional voltage level is 35kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy, reactor switch group name and coding accuracy and busbar quantity accuracy.

[0117] Specifically, the number of equipment components to be counted corresponding to the 35kV optional voltage level is determined to be: the total number of equipment components, the number of isolated components, the number of transformer switch group name and coding errors, the total number of transformer switch groups, the number of capacitor switch group name and coding errors, the total number of capacitor switch groups, the number of reactor switch group name and coding errors, the total number of reactor switch groups, the number of bus errors, and the total number of optional voltage levels. Since the method for determining the isolated component control rate is the same as the method for determining the isolated component control rate corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level described above; and the method for determining the transformer switch group name and coding accuracy rate, the capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy rate, and the reactor switch group name and coding accuracy rate is the same as the method for determining the knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy rate corresponding to the 500kV optional voltage level described above, this embodiment will not be described in detail here. Regarding the bus number accuracy rate in this embodiment, the bus number accuracy rate can be determined by the bus ratio between the number of bus errors and the total number of optional voltage levels, and the difference between the preset value and the bus ratio value is used as the bus number accuracy rate.

[0118] The above-mentioned method for determining sub-evaluation values ​​determines the corresponding equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification indicators for each optional voltage level, and determines the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level based on the equipment components to be counted and the topological network relationship. This method can determine different equipment components to be counted for different characteristics of each optional voltage level and different equipment component verification indicators, thereby obtaining sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to different verification indicators, further making the determined sub-evaluation values ​​more accurate and reasonable, and providing data guarantee for the subsequent determination of the topological data verification evaluation value based on the sub-evaluation values.

[0119] In one embodiment, this embodiment provides an optional method for verifying and evaluating substation topology data, and uses the method applied to a server as an example for illustration. As shown in Figures 6a and 6b, the method includes the following steps:

[0120] S601, obtaining original data of each substation in the target area.

[0121] S602: Determine a method for identifying the original data according to the data format of the original data.

[0122] S603: Identify the substation data of each substation from the original data according to the identification method.

[0123] S604: Determine the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area.

[0124] S605 , for each optional voltage level of each substation, determining the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification index for the optional voltage level.

[0125] S606: Determine the number of equipment components to be counted based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation.

[0126] S607: Determine a sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under a preset equipment component verification index according to the number of equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area.

[0127] S608, based on the first-level weight corresponding to each sub-evaluation indicator, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator are weighted and summed to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator.

[0128] S609 , performing weighted summation processing on the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicators according to the secondary weights corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators, to obtain the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation.

[0129] S610 , performing weighted summation processing on the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation according to the three-level weights corresponding to the optional voltage levels of each substation, to obtain a verification score value of each substation.

[0130] S611 , determining a topology network model between the substations based on the substation data of the substations in the target area.

[0131] S612: Verify the evaluation value of each substation according to the topological data of each substation to determine the evaluation level to which each substation belongs.

[0132] S613: Update the topology network model according to the display mode corresponding to the evaluation level of each substation, and display the updated topology network model.

[0133] It should be understood that, although the various steps in the flowcharts involved in the various embodiments described above are displayed in sequence according to the instructions of the arrows, these steps are not necessarily executed in sequence in the order indicated by the arrows. Unless otherwise specified herein, there is no strict order restriction on the execution of these steps, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least a portion of the steps in the flowcharts involved in the various embodiments described above can include multiple steps or multiple stages, and these steps or stages are not necessarily executed and completed at the same time, but can be executed at different times, and the execution order of these steps or stages is not necessarily to be carried out in sequence, but can be executed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least a portion of steps or stages in other steps.

[0134] Based on the same inventive concept, embodiments of the present application also provide a substation topology data verification and evaluation device for implementing the substation topology data verification and evaluation method described above. The solution provided by this device is similar to the solution described in the method described above. Therefore, the specific limitations of one or more substation topology data verification and evaluation device embodiments provided below can be found in the limitations of the substation topology data verification and evaluation method described above and will not be repeated here.

[0135] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG7 , a substation topology data verification and evaluation device 1 is provided, comprising: a relationship determination module 10, a subvalue determination module 11, and a verification determination module 12, wherein:

[0136] a relationship determination module 10 for determining the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0137] The sub-value determination module 11 is used to determine the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index according to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation;

[0138] The verification determination module 12 is used to determine the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0139] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG8 , the sub-value determination module 11 in FIG7 includes:

[0140] The component determination unit 110 is configured to determine, for each optional voltage level of each substation, the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification index for the optional voltage level;

[0141] The quantity determination unit 111 is configured to determine the quantity of the equipment components to be counted based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation;

[0142] The sub-value determining unit 112 is configured to determine a sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under a preset equipment component verification index according to the number of equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area.

[0143] In one embodiment, the sub-value determination module 11 in FIG7 includes:

[0144] 500kV transformer subunit: If the selectable voltage level is 500kV, then the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the selectable voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy, and circuit isolation knife switch quantity accuracy;

[0145] 220kV transformer subunit, for when the selectable voltage level is 220kV, then the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the selectable voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, line switch group name and code accuracy rate, transformer switch group name and code accuracy rate, circuit breaker quantity accuracy rate, and circuit isolation switch quantity accuracy rate;

[0146] 35kV transformer subunit, used for if the optional voltage level is 35kV voltage level, then the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy, reactor switch group name and coding accuracy and busbar quantity accuracy.

[0147] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG9 , the verification determination module 12 in FIG7 includes:

[0148] The component score determination unit 120 is configured to perform a weighted summation process on the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the selectable voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index based on the primary weight corresponding to each sub-evaluation index, thereby obtaining a weighted score value for the selectable voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index;

[0149] The transformer score determination unit 121 is configured to perform a weighted summation process on the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicators based on the secondary weights corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators, thereby obtaining a weighted score value for the optional voltage level of each substation;

[0150] The substation score determination unit 122 is configured to perform weighted summation processing on the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation according to the three-level weights corresponding to the optional voltage levels of each substation to obtain the verification score value of each substation.

[0151] In one embodiment, the preset equipment component verification indicators include: an isolated component verification indicator, an equipment name and number verification indicator, and an equipment quantitative relationship verification indicator.

[0152] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG10 , the substation topology data verification and evaluation device 1 in FIG7 further includes:

[0153] The data acquisition module 13 is used to obtain the original data of each substation in the target area;

[0154] A method determination module 14 is used to determine the identification method of the original data according to the data format of the original data;

[0155] The data identification module 15 is configured to identify the substation data of each substation from the original data according to an identification method.

[0156] In one embodiment, as shown in FIG11 , the substation topology data verification and evaluation device 1 in FIG5 further includes:

[0157] A model determination module 16 is configured to determine a topological network model between the substations based on the substation data of the substations in the target area;

[0158] A level determination module 17 is used to verify the evaluation value according to the topological data of each substation and determine the evaluation level of each substation;

[0159] The level display module 18 is used to update the topology network model according to the display mode corresponding to the evaluation level of each substation, and display the updated topology network model.

[0160] Each module in the aforementioned substation topology data verification and evaluation device can be implemented in whole or in part through software, hardware, or a combination thereof. Each module can be embedded in or independent of a processor in a computer device in hardware form, or can be stored in a computer device memory in software form, so that the processor can call and execute the corresponding operations of each module.

[0161] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be shown in Figure 12. The computer device includes a processor, memory, a communication interface, a display screen, and an input device connected via a system bus. The processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The communication interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal via wired or wireless communication, and the wireless communication may be achieved via Wi-Fi, a mobile cellular network, NFC (near-field communication), or other technologies. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a method for verifying and evaluating substation topology data is implemented. The display screen of the computer device may be a liquid crystal display or an electronic ink display screen. The input device of the computer device may be a touch layer covering the display screen, or may be buttons, a trackball, or a touchpad provided on the computer device housing, or may be an external keyboard, touchpad, or mouse.

[0162] Those skilled in the art will understand that the structure shown in FIG12 is merely a block diagram of a portion of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.

[0163] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the processor executes the computer program, the following steps are implemented:

[0164] Determine the topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0165] According to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined;

[0166] The topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0167] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0168] For each optional voltage level of each substation, determine the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification index for the optional voltage level;

[0169] Determine the number of equipment components to be counted based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation;

[0170] According to the number of equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined.

[0171] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0172] If the optional voltage level is 500kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy and circuit isolation knife switch quantity accuracy;

[0173] If the optional voltage level is 220kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators for the optional voltage level include: isolated component management rate, line switch group name and coding accuracy rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy rate, circuit breaker quantity accuracy rate, and circuit isolation switch quantity accuracy rate;

[0174] If the optional voltage level is 35kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy, reactor switch group name and coding accuracy and busbar quantity accuracy.

[0175] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0176] According to the first-level weight corresponding to each sub-evaluation indicator, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator are weighted and summed to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator;

[0177] According to the secondary weights corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicators are weighted summed to obtain the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation;

[0178] According to the three-level weights corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage level of each substation are weighted summed to obtain the verification score value of each substation.

[0179] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0180] The preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component verification indicators, equipment name and number verification indicators, and equipment quantitative relationship verification indicators.

[0181] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0182] Obtain the original data of each substation in the target area;

[0183] Determine the identification method of the original data according to the data format of the original data;

[0184] According to the identification method, the substation data of each substation is identified from the original data.

[0185] In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the processor further implements the following steps:

[0186] Determine the topological network model between substations based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0187] Verify the evaluation value based on the topological data of each substation and determine the evaluation level of each substation;

[0188] The topology network model is updated according to the display mode corresponding to the evaluation level of each substation, and the updated topology network model is displayed.

[0189] In one embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored. When the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are implemented:

[0190] Determine the topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0191] According to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined;

[0192] The topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0193] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0194] For each optional voltage level of each substation, determine the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification index for the optional voltage level;

[0195] Determine the number of equipment components to be counted based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation;

[0196] According to the number of equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined.

[0197] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0198] If the optional voltage level is 500kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy and circuit isolation knife switch quantity accuracy;

[0199] If the optional voltage level is 220kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators for the optional voltage level include: isolated component management rate, line switch group name and coding accuracy rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy rate, circuit breaker quantity accuracy rate, and circuit isolation switch quantity accuracy rate;

[0200] If the optional voltage level is 35kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy, reactor switch group name and coding accuracy and busbar quantity accuracy.

[0201] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0202] According to the first-level weight corresponding to each sub-evaluation indicator, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator are weighted and summed to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator;

[0203] According to the secondary weights corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicators are weighted summed to obtain the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation;

[0204] According to the three-level weights corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage level of each substation are weighted summed to obtain the verification score value of each substation.

[0205] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0206] The preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component verification indicators, equipment name and number verification indicators, and equipment quantitative relationship verification indicators.

[0207] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0208] Obtain the original data of each substation in the target area;

[0209] Determine the identification method of the original data according to the data format of the original data;

[0210] According to the identification method, the substation data of each substation is identified from the original data.

[0211] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0212] Determine the topological network model between substations based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0213] Verify the evaluation value based on the topological data of each substation and determine the evaluation level of each substation;

[0214] The topology network model is updated according to the display mode corresponding to the evaluation level of each substation, and the updated topology network model is displayed.

[0215] In one embodiment, a computer program product is provided, comprising a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

[0216] Determine the topological network relationship between equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0217] According to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined;

[0218] The topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

[0219] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0220] For each optional voltage level of each substation, determine the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification index for the optional voltage level;

[0221] Determine the number of equipment components to be counted based on the topological network relationship between the equipment components in the substation;

[0222] According to the number of equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined.

[0223] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0224] If the optional voltage level is 500kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy and circuit isolation knife switch quantity accuracy;

[0225] If the optional voltage level is 220kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators for the optional voltage level include: isolated component management rate, line switch group name and coding accuracy rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy rate, circuit breaker quantity accuracy rate, and circuit isolation switch quantity accuracy rate;

[0226] If the optional voltage level is 35kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy, reactor switch group name and coding accuracy and busbar quantity accuracy.

[0227] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0228] According to the first-level weight corresponding to each sub-evaluation indicator, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator are weighted and summed to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicator;

[0229] According to the secondary weights corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation under the preset equipment component verification indicators are weighted summed to obtain the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation;

[0230] According to the three-level weights corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage level of each substation are weighted summed to obtain the verification score value of each substation.

[0231] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0232] The preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component verification indicators, equipment name and number verification indicators, and equipment quantitative relationship verification indicators.

[0233] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0234] Obtain the original data of each substation in the target area;

[0235] Determine the identification method of the original data according to the data format of the original data;

[0236] According to the identification method, the substation data of each substation is identified from the original data.

[0237] In one embodiment, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the following steps are further implemented:

[0238] Determine the topological network model between substations based on the substation data of each substation in the target area;

[0239] Verify the evaluation value based on the topological data of each substation and determine the evaluation level of each substation;

[0240] The topology network model is updated according to the display mode corresponding to the evaluation level of each substation, and the updated topology network model is displayed.

[0241] It should be noted that the data involved in this application (including but not limited to data used for analysis, stored data, displayed data, etc.) are all information and data authorized by the user or fully authorized by all parties.

[0242] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be implemented by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to memory, database or other media used in the embodiments provided in this application may include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory may include read-only memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM), phase change memory (PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory may include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory, etc. As an illustration and not limitation, RAM can be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM). The database involved in the various embodiments provided in this application may include a non-relational database, such as a graph database, a distributed database based on blockchain, etc., but is not limited thereto. The processor involved in the various embodiments provided in this application may be a general-purpose processor, a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic unit, a data processing logic unit based on quantum computing, etc., but is not limited thereto.

[0243] The technical features of the above embodiments can be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification.

[0244] The above-described embodiments merely represent several implementation methods of the present application. While the descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, they should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present application. It should be noted that variations and improvements may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present application, and such variations and improvements are within the scope of protection of the present application. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present application shall be determined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A substation topology data verification and evaluation method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Determine the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation based on the substation topology data of each substation in the target area; Determine the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index according to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation; The topology data verification evaluation value of each substation is determined based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The determining, according to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation, the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index includes: For each optional voltage level of each substation, determine the equipment components to be counted under the preset equipment component verification index for the optional voltage level; Determining the quantity of the equipment elements to be counted according to the topological network relationship between the equipment elements in the substation; According to the quantity value of the equipment components to be counted and the number of substations in the target area, a sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of the substation under the preset equipment component verification index is determined.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that If the optional voltage level is 500kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification index include: isolated component management rate, knife switch component switch group name and coding accuracy, circuit breaker quantity accuracy and circuit isolation knife switch quantity accuracy; If the optional voltage level is 220kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification index include: isolated component management rate, line switch group name and coding correctness rate, transformer switch group name and coding correctness rate, circuit breaker quantity correctness rate and circuit isolation switch quantity correctness rate; If the optional voltage level is 35kV, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level under the preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component management rate, transformer switch group name and coding accuracy, capacitor switch group name and coding accuracy, reactor switch group name and coding accuracy and bus quantity accuracy.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Determining the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation according to the sub-evaluation value, the primary weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the secondary weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the tertiary weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation includes: According to the first-level weight corresponding to each sub-evaluation index, the sub-evaluation values ​​corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index are weighted and summed to obtain the weighted score value of the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index; According to the secondary weights corresponding to the preset equipment component verification indicators, the optional voltage levels of each substation are The weighted score values ​​of the substations are weighted summed to obtain the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage levels of each substation; According to the three-level weights corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation, the weighted score values ​​of the optional voltage level of each substation are weighted summed to obtain the verification score value of each substation.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that: The preset equipment component verification indicators include: isolated component verification indicators, equipment name and number verification indicators, and equipment quantitative relationship verification indicators.

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that Also includes: Obtain the original data of each substation in the target area; Determining an identification method of the original data according to a data format of the original data; According to the identification method, the substation data of each substation is identified from the original data.

7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that After determining the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation, the method further includes: Determine the topological network model between the substations based on the substation data of each substation in the target area; Verify the evaluation value based on the topological data of each substation and determine the evaluation level of each substation; According to the display mode corresponding to the evaluation level of each substation, the topology network model is updated, and the updated topology network model is displayed.

8. A substation topology data verification and evaluation device, characterized in that: The device comprises: A relationship determination module, for determining the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation based on the substation data of each substation in the target area; A sub-value determination module, used to determine the sub-evaluation value corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation under the preset equipment component verification index according to the topological network relationship between the equipment components in each substation; The verification determination module is used to determine the topology data verification evaluation value of each substation based on the sub-evaluation value, the first-level weight corresponding to the sub-evaluation value, the second-level weight corresponding to the preset equipment component verification index, and the third-level weight corresponding to the optional voltage level of each substation.

9. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, wherein: When the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 are implemented.

Images